I think we are now seeing the outlines of how the Fourth Branch of Government are planning to keep control over information, specifically public discussion on Big Tech platforms, even as Elon Musk moves to open the valves of information from the social media platform Twitter.
Previously the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) announced a new Dept of Homeland Security priority to combat disinformation {LINK} on technology platforms including social media.
Many eyebrows were raised as the announcement appeared to be an open admission that the U.S. government was going to control information by applying labels, that would align with allies in social media, who need a legal justification for censorship and content removal.
This CISA announcement was quickly followed by various government officials and agencies saying it was critical to combat Russian disinformation, as the events in Ukraine unfolded. In essence, Ukraine was the justification for search engines like Google, DuckDuckGo, and social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube to begin targeting information and content that did not align with the official U.S. government narrative.
Previously those same methods were deployed by the U.S. government, specifically the CDC and FDA, toward COVID-19 and the vaccination program. All of this background aligns with the previous visibility of a public-private partnership between the bureaucracy of government, the U.S. intelligence agencies and U.S. social media. That partnership now forms the very cornerstone of the DHS/CISA effort to control what information exists in the public space. It is highly important that people understand what is happening.
In July of 2021 the first admission of the official agenda behind the public-private partnership was made public {Reuters Article}.
What we are seeing now is an extension of the government control mechanisms, combined with a severe reaction by all stakeholders to the latest development in the Twitter takeover.
For two years the control mechanisms around information have been cemented by govt and Big Tech. Even the deployment of the linguistics around disinformation, misinformation and malinformation is all part of that collective effort. The collaboration between the government and Big Tech is not a matter for debate, it is all easily referenced by their own admissions. The current issue is how they are deploying the information controls.
We have COVID-19, the vaccination effort and now Ukraine as examples of the collaboration to control information, to control what people are permitted to question and discuss on the internet. Now things are getting much more detailed, and more alarming.
Shortly after Elon Musk made a bid to purchase a single information platform, Twitter, and then expressed his intent to open the speech valves, former Obama administration intelligence officials wrote a letter {SEE HERE} warning about efforts to break up the information control by Big Tech and Social Media.
That letter was shortly followed by a speech delivered by Obama himself where he specifically demanded that government take a larger role in the control of information {LINK}, essentially promoting an Orwellian ‘Ministry of Truth’ to control information in the public sphere.
The internet search engine operators have already agreed to align with the interests of the government. That’s not debatable as in the examples of Google {LINK) and DuckDuckGo {LINK} to name just two. Social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and YouTube have famously also expressed their intent to align with the control of information, based on the instructions and edicts of the same U.S. government agencies. Again, this is not a conspiratorial claim, it is self admitted and we have all witnessed it.
Today, however, we are seeing the architecture of how they plan to organize the tools.
(POLITICO) – “DHS is standing up a new Disinformation Governance Board to coordinate countering misinformation related to homeland security, focused specifically on irregular migration and Russia. Nina Jankowicz will head the board as executive director. She previously was a disinformation fellow at the Wilson Center, advised the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry as part of the Fulbright Public Policy Fellowship and oversaw Russia and Belarus programs at the National Democratic Institute.” (link)
You can read more about Nina Jankowicz and her ideological alignment with the control mechanisms here and here. The bigger picture issue is that DHS will now work around any independence of social media, vis-a-vis Twitter as a free speech platform, by defining the parameters of allowed conversation. A bureaucratic board within DHS will now serve as the group who defines what can and cannot be discussed.
Here’s Ms. Jankowicz in September of 2020. The head of the DHS governance board, Nina Jankowicz, claiming that color revolutions are an appropriate response to rigged elections, but they will never rise in the U.S. WATCH:
It doesn’t take a deep thinker to see exactly where this is going. Various U.S. government agencies will now define their interests. The definitions will then be transmitted to the officers within big tech and social media, and any entity who dares to challenge that govt definition or govt narrative will be targeted for content removal.
Permitted speech will be defined by government agencies, and the mechanisms for controlling, targeting or removing speech that challenges that narrative will now lead to content removal. The shift here, the part that must be emphasized, is the official justification in the terms and conditions of the social media platform operators will come from U.S. government agencies, not the platform itself.
Against this backdrop it is not a surprise why Elon Musk’s entry into the information space is now considered a risk.
It is a simple and effective plan. No one is listening to their news, buying their papers and Twitter is infested with lunatics and bots. Meanwhile, Truth Social is about to launch and there are becoming very viable alternatives to Twitter, Fakebook, etc. who have declining stock.
The solution? Kill free speech! How? regulate it to death. The problem? They need GOP cooperation to pass laws to “control misinformation”. That’s a tough sell.
After Musk buys Twitter, MSNBC and friends come out with well publicized hysteria and tell us how dangerous it is for an individual to control Twitter. They rip back the curtain and explain in great detail what they themselves were doing to control information. Everyone is surprised and laughs at their self-unawareness. Why would they confess their sins and put it all out there for us to see??
Musk becomes a savior to all but the nutcases and twitter bots. Dorsey calms the troops by assuring them that he agrees that Musk’s play is the “singular solution”. The EU says that you can’t bring it here and Musk comes out and says Twitter will have free speech as allowed by the laws of the land. That sounds reasonable enough.
Next, expect Hannity and Fox as to chew on the bone of what the liberals just confessed, in great detail endlessly Outrage! Outrage! There must be investigations! and sternly worded letters. They are shocked! Shocked! This must never happen again!1
MSNBC and all the woke will become hysterical about what Musk can do, as a billionaire Twitter owner, to subvert the democratic process. Laws must be passed to stop [what they were previously doing]!!!!
FOX will have endless shows where beautiful women in cocktail dresses and witty hosts will bring out lefty guests who insist we need legislation to control misinformation. Then they will all laugh at and mock the guest talking about how self-unaware the left is. They will batter the guest over the head with old clips showing the hypocrisy of the lefts’ new found outrage over using Twitter to hide and control information. Ha, ha! So fun.
The left will demand legislation to control the spread of misinformation. The right will demand legislation to assure that Trump and MTG will never ever be banned from Twitter again.
Endless 24/7/365 discussions as they all chew on this bone daily.
The solution? More government regulation!! Lindsey will strut out. Mitch will make it happen.
Sigh.
Thanks, that was an enjoyable walk through a shower of sarcasm & cynicism. And as the saying goes, cynicism is nothing more than an unpleasant way of expressing the truth.
Well done!
I totally agree, well done!
Outstanding.
Two months?
“Nina Jankowicz 🇺🇦🇺🇸
@wiczipedia
Cat’s out of the bag: here’s what I’ve been up to the past two months, and why I’ve been a bit quiet on here.
Honored to be serving in the Biden Administration @DHSgov and helping shape our counter-disinformation efforts.”
https://politico.com/newsletters/pl
Another rabid, unhinged Fascist.
But, IIRC, Elon Musk made his offer to buy Twitter this month. She says they have been working on this for the last “two months”?
🤔
Rabid dogs are put down.
Yes, they are.
Interesting how she has ties back to Ukraine and Clinton(s). There are tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands just like her crawling all over within the Ameristani government.
“what I’ve been up to for the past two months”
That timing would probably line up with when the NSA started hearing conversation within Team Musk about buying Twitter while they were conducting routine eavesdropping operations.
Yep! So, the cat is really “out of the bag”, then.
Also, Trumps Truth Social!
I think it’s all orchestrated. Elon enrages the left which creates the justification for the government intervention.
He is very experienced at chowing down at the government through.
He is a black hat, not a hero. Neuralink and wiring up monkey brains Fauci style tells you all you need to know.
Unless he’s gone, shall we say, Durham style . . .
I guess we will see.
By George, I think he’s got it!
And of course there’s a post wall cat mommy in charge.
Almost like there’s a pattern…
There’s a pattern alright but we’re not allowed to notice it here.
Just call them name stealers. It is what they were being called back 2000+ years ago by neighboring tribes in the Khazaria region. No descendants of Shem need apply.
I’d say anything the government slaps a “misinformation” label on is going to be regarded as straight truth.
What an embarrassment. This Jancowitcz chick is a joke if she thinks this will have any effect.
Never underestimate the power of the dark side. Did Fauci have an effect?
1st amendment applies to the US Government. This will be interesting.
Yes. The Constitution states , “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.”
Abridging is to reduce, limit or condense, to curtail. I believe it is time for the Supreme Court to smack down this administration for its unconstitutional regulations and this new department.
But that would require a SC that is not hindered by blackmail or threats thereof.
‘Congress shall make no law’ is not the same as the executive branch making a regulation or enforcing/not enforcing a particular part of a law. The latter is not expressly forbidden by the Constitution, the former is expressly forbidden. Some would say that such power reverts to, and exists at, the state level…or to the people. How would a court handle such a challenge to an executive order or regulation, which is clearly and expressly forbidden to the Legislative branch …other than to says there is ‘no standing’ to challenge it?…Asking for the founders.
State AG’s can file suit that this is unConstitutional.
Remember how this Regime used corporations as a proxy for Government and asked them to force their workers to be jabbed with experimental toxins or lose their jobs?
I am sorry this seems like a no brain-er and a gift from GOD. Are there no Constitutional lawyers willing to defend free speech? They just presented Prima Fascia evidence of their intentions without any legal authority that could stand up to scrutiny.
The sad part is they don’t care. They’ll say the constitution needs updating or that they’re operating under the threat of some emergency they either created or even simply made up.
If I were Musk, I’d make a detailed explanation of the situation as SD described it, announce it insurmountable and withdraw his bid. So it cost him a billion in surrender fees. Twitter stock immediately drops to $25 at best. Let the worms wallow there for a while then announce support for Truth Social. Otherwise, Elon will be subjected to relentless persecution. The trick will be dumping the stock he has purchased ASAP. I wish him well.
For which he would be subject to at least a dozen prosecutorial SEC violations… “pump and dump” for one.
Nope. Let Elon take Twitter over, allow all free speech, and get persecuted by gov goons. Musk probably has an additional $250 billion dollars to defend the 1A, and he will have standing. It’s perfect.
Agreed. I’m sure he factored this all in before he made the offer. Purchasing Twitter was just the first step.
George Orwell’s 1984 already had a name for this… “The Ministry of TRUTH.”
The Meme “1984 isn’t supposed to be a guide book” still holds true for Progressives.
Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, Ministry of Truth with lies, Ministry of Love with torture and Ministry of Plenty with starvation. These contradictions are not accidental, nor do they result from ordinary hypocrisy: they are deliberate exercises in doublethink -Orwell
Every single agent at DHS and all the other three letter agencies – should be ashamed to be in that system, and should be ashamed of themselves for perpetrating evil against American citizens. But I guess when people are crooked – they really don’t care what anyone thinks. The good news is: God gets out the truth far and wide – and no one can stop him.
Wonder exactly how they plan to do that? If Twitter allows free speech and the government doesn’t agree with what someone says, what will they do? Remove that person from Twitter or from being seen on Twitter, even if Twitter is supporting that someone being on Twitter? Will the government remove the content that people can see from the internet? Acting directly?
What about Gab and Telegram, Gettr, and Truth Social? Will the government directly intervene to remove these sites from the internet? Or directly remove their content from the internet?
Cyberwarfare of some sort I suspect.
If they issue edicts to enforce their speech codes they would have to have means of forcing compliance.
Which seems it would create a cybertrail that victims and organizations could expose.
So they have to have some means of silencing those they are issuing edicts to, or destroying things surreptitiously.
what are the hardware resources that Twitter (and other social media companies) use, and where are those machines? and who owns them? and who controls them. Answers still out there….I don’t know but the answer will be contained in the answers to these questions. Mockingbird.
Why do you think a social credit score is being rolled out in various places?
I know China and Italy already have it.
They will punish you. They’re working on it being more dire than not being able to post or participate on social media.
There are attempts in various areas in the US trying to link vaccination status and tax rates. Put that together with a social credit score rollout and the government will have absolute control.
The digital ID is the ultimate goal and would govern every “freedom” they will allow you to have.
That’s going to take longer than they have.
Rhode Island can try it, get caught up in court, and suffer population loss to both domestic migration and death by vaxx, but Florida and other states are going to be holding out and making any kind of discrimination based on social credit or vaxx status illegal.
Tennessee just passed a bill making treating someone with natural immunity differently than a jabbed person illegal. A new civil rights public accommodations law. It is waiting on the Governor’s signature.
Tennessee just made Ivermectin legal OTC. What’s RI going to do when people in TN send Ivermectin to people in RI? Invade? Over medical freedom?
We are not France. We have a federal system. That’s why they need to take us down, and why it has taken them 40 years of planning and terror to put the tools in place to try to accomplish their goal.
House of cards, jenga tower.
Not if you live on a secluded mountain and are self sustaining.
“One ring to rule them all and in the darkness bind them”
Wonder exactly how they plan to do that?
Does China’s government control the internet that their people see? Yes. The Ameristani government is just as capable (and evil).
I don’t think there is anything they can do. I think this whole “misinformation department” or whatever they call it is just a bone thrown to the triggered communists after the Twitter sale. The 1A is a very solid rock, and they don’t have the support to budge it. And they know it.
The only avenue I can see is they alter or remove section 230 of the CDA, which provides that no “interactive computer service” (such as Twitter) shall be treated as a publisher, and thus not liable for what is posted by third parties. Removal or modification of section 230 would then presumably lead to lawsuits against Twitter for publishing “misinformation.” But then again, that big rock called the 1A is still blocking the way. One man’s misinformation is another man’s gospel.
“disinformation fellow”
OMG. What is that? Apparently her training specializes in propaganda dissemination and control.
That makes her the respectable liar then.
There is no dis-, mis-, desinformation
There is only information the Government wants you to hear, and the information that goes against Government narrative.
Example: Covid, one month something was “disinformation and conspiracy theory” and the next month it was proven true and factual. Now they want to give those same people that were repeatedly wrong on facts, the power to say what is fact… That is rich 😀
Information is information.
Think of it what you will.
Ignore it or embrace it. You do not need the Government to tell you what to embrace.
that is precisely the reasons for free speech.
the lessons throughout human history has proven this is the most important fundamental concept by which Humans can live.
free speech was not adopted by our founders SIMPLY because of the direct overlording of information by the crown.
speech (thinking/discussion/debate/commensurating) is a natural right. The very flaw of the human experience is overcome by the very existence that GOD has blessed humanity to behave as a social network. We talk to each other. And we seek better ideas, and even defend unpopular ideas. God gives us this ability so that we can learn…and progress….
The founders understood this natural right. That NO GOVERNMENT will have the power to direct the conversation and delimit ideas and debates and expecially those critical of the state…even incindiary speech. Which is the MOST IMPORTANT. combative caustic highly critical rejection of government power IS the most important reasons why protected speech and the restrictions placed on government exist. Because central governments have a tendency throughout history to ignore the people and lord over them.
Our constitution makes it perfectly clear that POWER is derived from THE PEOPLE, through it’s natural rights given by God that it may never be infringed.
It’s the MOST IMPORTANT PROTECTED RIGHT and it’s the most powerful restriction placed on USG.
they may use phrases like “mis, dis, mal – information”, but all of this is a direct attack on speech….
the constitution cannot be more clear in this matter.
This matter will not be solved in a courtroom…it will certainly wind it’s way up to the courts, but ultimately, this nation will have a revolution.
Stage 4 is but a whisper away.
When Castro cemented power he executed all the journalists. Maybe he was on to something.
The Fourth Estate is but a subset of the Fourth Branch.
Quite eager though.
Hey Treepers who owns Viasat? Anybody know where to sore some Bleachbit??
I just want to know where my damn asteroid is at.
I ordered that thing ages ago!
We have arrived….
Orwell – imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever.
I predict a run on manual and old Selectric typewriters; we can work in the dead of night
writing our conservative newsletters.
so on one hand James Woods and others are reinstated and discover they have tons of new interaction like the filters have all been turned off…
yet Musk does not legally own the company yet…
and wall street trading of the stock left it $6 below Musks ‘agreed’ purchase price of $54/share today… like many traders dont think this deal will happen.
not adding up.
TWTR 48.54 -1.145 -2.30% : TWITTER, INC. – MSN Money
roto-Reuters (please say its so) take. I hope this just makes Musk more determined.
Investors fret over potential Musk U-turn in $44 billion Twitter buyout (msn.com)
$6 under is the “premium”.
Why would it trade for more than his offer?
Why would you sell for less than his offer?
I haven’t looked, but I bet the volume is really low, I bet a lot of people with the right options are pumped.
A lot of big bucks on Wall Street right now shorting Twitter, plus nutcases like Markey in the Senate making statements that the sale should be prohibited. I also think they are now actively “burning their papers” in the Twitter back rooms right about now.
To amend my previous comment. A lot of bucks are shorting Tesla now, not Twitter. I understand that trading was halted on Twitter on the day the sale was announced – it’s now a private company. So I’m not sure how there could be reading results from today. Are you sure that wasn’t the price when trading was halted?
Bring it. This will generate — by its first action — a suit that winds up at SCOTUS which will find it…
unconstitutional, and set a lasting precedent.
constitutional, and trigger the civil war we have been long expecting.
You have an awful lot of faith in our SCOTUS.
It’s pretty cut and dried.
I believe it is also…
but I am also aware that scotus is unpredictable on such matters.
(noting: there is a recent NEW movement afoot that calls from Justice Thomas to be impeached from scotus…apparently the radicals are moving in force and pressuring congress to take action on some angle that his wife’s political connections and interests are somehow a violation or presents some kind of perception he can no longer rule effectively objectively)
So was the OBamaCare “tax.” Right?
Sounds a lot like Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda.
Dezinformatsiya
Deep state goons gathered today to pay tribute to the first female Secretary of State in U.S. history, the deceased mass-murderer Madeleine Albright. While not in this group photo of fake Christians, the evil Killary was there at the podium singing the praises of the bloodthirsty Clinton crony, Albright.
I can think of quite a few more obits I would love to read.
How come Willy’s not wearing a mask?
Because, whether one agrees with his views or not, he is one really smart dude.
🥴
Oops!
c/o Jack Prosobiec:
https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1519386106042716165?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1519386106042716165%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatriots.win%2F%3Ffrom%3D15HbuFQ8g9
Good heavens. It’s a cross between Gretchen Witchmer and Jake Ardern.
Lol!
Elsewhere it’s being debated on whether she’s actually a dude.
Bottom line: who gave anyone the right to determine what disinformation is?
Liars.
So who will challenge the constitutionality of such a government agency?? Surely, that challenge should be eminent right??
JoeBama’s folks are actually implementing part of the Senate Bill 1, Voter Rights Law, that they cannot pass through Congress wrapped in a faux National Security Blanket.
This is a Provision buried in the proposed Act sitting in the Senate awaiting approval. There is another provision that allows for CONGRESS to investigate a candidate and disqualify them from an election, if Congress deems they are spreading disinformation.
This is the start of the bald face implementation of the Voter Rights Act, 1-section at a time via Executive Order.
Keep in mind…this board is established to check on everybody but the Government who is authorized to lie via modification of the Smith-Mundt Act in 2013….hmmmm
Don’t look for much, if any help from Republicans, the GOPe has to remove candidates and control messaging just as much as the democrats….UNI-PARTY.
If they successfully push us all offline, I would consider it a blessing. We can all go back to getting together in one another’s homes, having Sunday dinners together after church, meeting up at the local coffee shop, baseball game, rodeo, or feed store – back to all in person relationships – much healthier. They tried to stamp that out with covid hysteria, but it didn’t work. Even video conferencing, which is in very high usage, isn’t the same as in person meetings. We didn’t use to have the Internet, or cell phones, or cable television, etc. People actually walked outside and talked to their neighbors over the fence, neighborhoods did BBQs. 4th of July and Memorial Day used to be a big deal in the neighborhood, along with all the other holidays. On Christmas Eve, our family would walk through the neighborhood and sing Christmas carols for all our neighbors! So much basic human contact has been lost.
They can’t win if we just turn them off.
you got to take it to the streets and show up in numbers on the street. strongly worded letters don’t get there.
Am assuming the UCLA will be front and center bringing up a lawsuit about the constitutionality of such a device to monitor, abridge, the freedoms of speech and association. Right???
(p.s. didn’t think a /s (sarc) tag would be needed, but just in case, /s)
Falco – Der Kommissar ?
Odesklaw Herr Kommissar?
It has a smile on it’s face and speaks softly. We are here to help.
Why do they always look the way you’d expect them to look?
We need a better class of Nazi.
Sundance, it’s time we started letting everyone know through your writings, that these big tech companies cannot act on behalf of the government without falling under the STATE ACTOR DOCTRINE.
What The government cannot do under the constitution directly, it cannot do indirectly, such as delegating to private companies. If the Government delegates some of its activities to a private company, that company becomes a state actor in respect that activity and is bound by all constitutional restrictions on government.
So if big Tech follows the delegating of this unconstitutional new division set up by the DHS, they are subject to lawsuits for violating the constitutional rights of we the people. This is exactly how we get around the 230 BS and Debilitate those who are trying to destroy our country.
Spot on. State actor doctrine.
In fact, considering they were all created and funded by our tax dollars during development (DARPA Lifelog), then coordinated with IC both directly and through cut outside (Cambridge Analytics), all that censorship that FYGT have been doing these past five or more years should make them all liable for violations of civil rights and illegal government regulation of speech. Class action.
BTW, Alex Berenson has a very relevant post up on his Substack. His case against Twitter for violations of the CA law and CA constitution are going to a hearing tomorrow at 8 am CA time.
Exactly and to simplify the explanation it is akin to the Government “contracting” an enforcement service. Once contracted, or being delegated a “power” to enforce, the Private Company becomes an actual part of the State….in other words there is NO INDIRECT about it. The Big Tech firm is a DIRECT extension of the Government by definition.
An example of indirect would be a party complying with a regulation or guideline set down by the State. In this case the party is complying with direction internally and NOT enforcing compliance by others.
If the words “delegate” or “contract” are part of the discussion…the party acting under these words is DIRECTLY Acting as a representative member the Government.
Hmmm…
That’s probably true of Twitter right now, a state actor.
It’s first arrest should be itself for spreading disinfo.
Ah..but thanks to the rewrite of Smith-Mundy, the Government is allowed to lie.
What approval am I waiting for? The state actor doctrine is common knowledge.
You’re waiting for initial moderation. Everyone who is new to our blog has their initial comment(s) moderated.
strike one ; )
🙃
So.. Does this mean the stickers are back?
https://www.businessinsider.com/35-years-pmrc-rock-lyrics-senate-tipper-gore-frank-zappa-2020-9
How is government control of speech constitutional?
We need major lawsuits and public condemnation.
We need a valid Google alternative. Any free speech billionaires out there up to buying Google?
There are plenty of Google alternatives – swisscows, peekier, searX are all search engines that respect privacy; and there are other free email services that are private.
Unfortunately, Android and Apple are pretty much it for cell phones.
Interesting tidbit re. existing backdoor access for gov officials on Twitter…
Source:
https://patriots.win/p/15HbuHgvv5/elon-suggests-hell-be-digging-in/c/
I think Sundance hit this not all that long ago?
Or another Treeper.
But I stinking forgot so thanks much!!
Am excellent primer on propaganda can be found on “The Burning Platform” blog – The Psychology of Manipulation: 6 Lessons from the Master of Propaganda. https://www.theburningplatform.com/2022/04/27/the-psychology-of-manipulation-6-lessons-from-the-master-of-propaganda/#more-267340
Mockingbird, Mockingbird, Mockingbird. Anyone remember what the Mockingbird sounds like….this time?
Knowing is difficult.
Fakebook already has communist censors from China.
https://nypost.com/2020/10/20/meet-your-chinese-facebook-censors/
Simply put, DHS should be disbanded! Their ONLY function is as a NEOlibrebubliCON PUBLIC CONTROL MECHANISM, nothing more …. safety be damned! About as effective as the F*#kin • morally Bankrupt • Imbicels.
Get Rid of Em! BOTH
Frankly I thought “Homeland” was creepy when they came out with that.
We don’t do Der Vaterland here.
Fortunately, a large number of people have already gone “underground” and have been tapping into alternatives for years now. Patriot Soapbox was my first introduction to the underground, then Reddit, then CTH, Telegram and Gab, until now there is connective tissue that spans the globe. Not always easy to find or tap into, but somehow the Truth continues to surface!
God Bless Sundance and the Conservative Tree House, Mike Lindell and Frank Speech, Brannon House and the World View programs among many, many others! And when I can connect into Truth Social, God Bless Devin Nunes and President Donald J. Trump!
” A bureaucratic board within DHS will now serve as the group who defines what can and cannot be discussed.”
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Over my dead body. NO
It’s not just Twitter they fear. It’s Dinesh’s 2000 Mules documentary about how the 2020 election was stolen.
“Systemic racism” BS is now “algorithmic racism” BS.
McCarthy the mobster.
Did a staffer do these recordings?
I understand now why the leftists hates the republican party. It is inhabited by conniving slithering snakes.
Wow…
The Deep State is so insecure that it is triggered to create The Ministry of Truth…go figure.
How is this constitutional? The government can’t regulate speech ! Where are the lawsuits?
I literally only get my news from a handful of sites. I don’t trust anything from the corrupt government.