In the ongoing public battle over Twitter as a speech platform, one actual user of Twitter, Chris Bakke, wanted to see who exactly these Board of Directors are, who are attempting to stop Elon Musk from purchasing it.
Chris Bakke then noted how little of the actual stock is owned by the company’s Board of Directors. Sans Twitter Founder Jack Dorsey, the combined ownership of the entire board equates to 77 shares of stock, worth around $3,200 bucks.
The Board of Directors [SEE BoD LINK HERE] consists of academics, tech executives, business and policy wonks, and a random baroness who doesn’t even use the service. These are the people who are making fiduciary decisions for all Twitter stock owners without any financial stake in the decisions they make for the company.
BOARD MEMBERS – (2) Bret Taylor, Independent Board Chair; Co-CEO, Salesforce (former Google exec). (3) Parag Agrawal,CEO, Twitter. (4) Mimi Alemayehou, Senior Vice President for Public – Private Partnership at Mastercard. (5) Dr. Fei-Fei Li, Professor at Stanford (former Google exec). (6) Egon Durban, Co-CEO, Silver Lake. (7) Robert Zoellick, Former Chairman of the Board of Directors of AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (8) Patrick Pichette, General Partner, Inovia Capital; Former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Google. (9) Martha Lane Fox, Founder and Chairperson, Lucky Voice Group; Former Co-Founder and Managing Director of lastminute.com; Crossbench Peer, House of Lords. (10) Omid Kordestani, Former Executive Chairman, Twitter (former Google exec). (11) David Rosenblatt, CEO, 1stdibs.com, Inc. (former Google exec). (12) Jack Dorsey, Co-Founder, Twitter; CEO and Co-Founder, Square.
Further evidence the motivations behind the Twitter board have nothing to do with stewardship for their shareholders. Again, this is yet another datapoint highlighting the background structure of Twitter that Musk is exposing.
Twitter is not making a decision to decline the generous offer by Elon Musk because of stewardship or fiduciary responsibility to shareholders. The financials of Twitter as a non-viable business model highlight the issue of money being irrelevant. Twitter does not and cannot make money. Growing Twitter only means growing an expense. Growing Twitter does not grow revenue enough to offset the increase in expense.
There is only one way for Twitter to exist as a viable entity, people are now starting to realize this.
What matters to the people behind Twitter, the people who are subsidizing the ability of Twitter to exist, is control over the global conversation.
Control of the conversation is priceless to the people who provide the backbone for Twitter.
Once people realize who is subsidizing Twitter, everything changes.
That’s the fight.
{Go Deep}
Elon Musk needs to contact the shareholders of Twitter and sue the board of directors for being non-fiduciary.
Tried to contact board member #7 but there is a problem.
He has no tweets and apparently has never even logged in to Twitter.
Robert Zoellick
According to Liberty Daily:
“President of the World Bank until 2012
Deputy Secretary of State for George W. Bush
Deputy Chief of Staff for George H.W. Bush
Top Foreign Affairs Advisor to Mitt Romney’s 2012 Presidential Campaign
Board Member, Council on Foreign Relations
Senior International Advisor to Goldman Sachs
Board Member for Temasek Holdings, Singapore’s Sovereign Wealth Fund
Recipient of Knight Commander’s Cross of the Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany”
Zoellick was among a group of RINOs
who wrote a letter saying they would not support a Trump presidency.
That Zoellick a Wesley Mouch looking jerk.
People like this creep are the reasons for the sad state of affairs in our great land and the world as a whole.
“…Own Almost No Shares of Stock in Company … “their economic interests are simply not aligned with shareholders”
IANAL (I am not a lawyer) and didn’t even sleep at Holiday Inn last night
… but that would seem to be good grounds to include in a shareholder lawsuit against the Board for failure to execute fiduciary responsibility
gnomesayin’?
IANAL either but IF I were a stockholder I would be pissed!
No. Their fiduciary responsibility is to the corporation not strictly to the shareholders. Traditionally that meant a duty to operate the corporation for the benefit of the shareholders–so effectively you were more or less right.
But you see that duty of a corporation has changed in the last decades. Now corporations see themselves as having to go be ESG (environmental, social and governance) standards. That is the rub; it essentially means that if a board believes it has to act for social good in this instance, that can pretty much justify any action it wants to take–because it effectively means the board has a duty to society not just its shareholders.
And as I developed in another post, a problem is that Twitters largest shareholders are woke funds like Black Rock, so they aren’t bothered by ESG, they are pushing for it and they will never align with Musk in a proxy battle.
This is where things are now. I am a corporate governance lawyer and it’s very scary.
So you are saying the law related to fiduciary shareholders no longer applies because of some amorphous cultural non-codified ESG? Just because there is corporate governance pushing ESG doesn’t make that law of the land?
Thanks Mr T
I was pretty much being a glib wiseguy
It’s good to hear from someone who actually knows what they’re talking about
He looks like a regular on Epstein Island.
Would it be out of the realm of possibility that the government put these people on the board? Willing donkeys.
Well, THAT explains a lot.
Thanks for posting. Wow, this guy is one powerful behind the scenes Globalist.
This list omits that Zoellick was also, first and foremost, the United States Trade Representative from 2001-2005. As such, he was the primary United States trade policy official and negotiator, cutting trade deals with China, Korea etc. that were anathema to the US worker and business owners.
Everybody knows TRUMP WON, did you post that on Twitter or directly inform Elon there?
Maybe he has a secret handle like ‘PIERRE DELECTO’?
Wow Vanguard, BlackRock, World Bank … can you say NWO. Alex Jones was right! — gots to get me one of those new AJWR T-shirts!
I believe he can sue them for dereliction of duty re fiduciary responsibility. That 38%+ premium he offered comes out to somewhere around 10 billion. In today’s economy where else is a shareholder going to get 38% over night?
There are a multitude of Shareholder rights law firms who make their living suing companies for minutia. They are probably chomping at the bit to file lawsuits seeking class action status come Monday.
Musk won’t have to sue, he can just sit back and laugh.
The numbers do not add up.
The ownership stakes add up to about .05%.
If this is 77 shares, then 1 percent is 1540 shares, and Elon’s stake is about 14,000 shares, at $40 a share would cost $560,000.
This is about one six thousandth of the amount he reportedly spent.
Yep, I noticed that at first glance as well. Not huge shareholders, but still out of my pay grade!
Re 77 shares, I don’t think that math is right. Maybe 77k
Even that is too low. I think there are 700 million shares, so .001% is 70k.
Would you like to show us the work that led to your ambiguous conclusion?
The reported math isn’t correct. There are 797.6 million shares outstanding, and from the list above, 0.12 % of the shares are owned by the board (not including Dorsey). That means that group owns about 957,120 shares…. worth $43,157,000 yesterday.
Still, it’s too few shares to enjoy full decision privilege over the system.
OK, but my only point was accuracy.
You are correct! Excluding Dorsey, the board owns about 1/1000th of the outstanding shares or about $44 million at Thursday’s close of $45/share. They have a financial stake.
Crazy that you end up with Board of Directors like that. I wonder which one represents Paul Singer? Anyway, I count 4 ex-Google execs, the CEO, Dorsey, a Stanford Professor, an Englishwoman, and the rest are from Hedge Funds or Mastecard execs.
This Board of Directors not only does NOT look like America, it doesn’t even look like Twitter’s Shareholders.
I wonder how many other USA Corporations have Board of Directors that don’t own much of the companies stock and have seem to have little to do with the companies business or the USA.
Well, if Hunter does it….
That Stanford “professor,” Fei Fei Li, is actually part of CCP’s Thousand Talents program and setup an AI program for Google in China –
Funny how all that works
Wow …
“I wonder how many other USA Corporations have Board of Directors that don’t own much of the companies stock and have seem to have little to do with the companies business or the USA.”
From what I’ve heard from Kyle Bass, the problem for US national interests is that too many “USA corporations” being multinationals have so many foreigners on their boards.
From 1976:
Wow. Great reporting, thank you.
Even the board doesn’t believe in the product they advise for, but they certainly appreciate and cash that board check. I wonder what old David Lynch from Fidelity would say.
What is really intersting in all this is how silent our faithful GOP has been during these events. Does the GOP even believe or even understand the Constitution and Bill of Rights and Laws they represent. They all need to go.
Greedy Old Possums gonna possum.
Hey man, I love my o’possoms……😊
They will eat anything. So, yeah. They’re appetite is much like the District of Corruption
If I was an employee with stock and stock options thinking I am set for life……better think again and dump fast!
That was my first thought too.
turkey!
In fact employees probably have proportionally way more skin in the game than the board…
Amen amen, thank you so much your investigative skills and insight are invaluable, again thank you so much.
Where else could I go except here for such good trustworthy analysis on these critical issues.
On Ted Talk, Elon Musk, “I have plan B”. Followed by question, “What is it, can you tell us…” NO!
Game on🥂🥂
That was one of my favoritest pregnant pauses ever as he answered that.
And holy cow, look what has been brought out in the open………. well at least we know now I doubt main stream will tell anyone.
Well, the Ted took place in Vancouver and my impression of the host was that he was far left — he challenged Musk when Musk said he was seeking truth by studying physics and math. I found it strange the host challenged the word “truth” as if there was some other word for it or that the word was not allowed. I found the host snobby IMO.
Wow, from a business and financial perspective of the Board of directors don’t want to own the stock, does Elon really want to pursue this? Especially if nefarious intelligence elements of US government hostile to Elon can pull the plug on the subsidy?
This just makes my admiration of Elon grow even more if he’s going in with a $43 billion offer that’s likely to go down the drain if he succeeds in taking Twitter over.
I think this is part of a bigger play. Perhaps we are seeing some sunlight shed on parts of the system because of intra-elite conflict.
The conflict is only when a board member owns stock of a competitor….Board members are free to own stock of the board they sit.
It would be interesting what other stocks these board members own. Journ0Lists, dig deeper! LFG! Lazy azzes!
I think he’s be OK. He’ll still have close to a quarter trillion USD left.
Yup, the Achilles’ heel of the globalists is their massive “databases.”
Globalists can’t control you without their massive “databases.”
Without their huge databases, they are just a small group of rich commies. who are sitting around in their gated villas counting their ill-gotten gains.
Pull the plug on the globalists/ coup plotter’s massive databases and set the world free……. it is that simple…… it truly is the Achilles’ heel of the globalists and the coup plotters, both foreign and domestic……… including the alpha deep swamp.
And to find out, we, the people, have been funding the infrastructure. Well, we can end that.
I don’t see a line on the spreadsheet for Clowns In America.
They are the underline.
Way down at the bottom.
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
·
1h
https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/svg/1f3b6.svg Love Me Tender https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/svg/1f3b6.svg
Mastercard stands out. That company actively has Paypal and attempted replacements refuse accounts to people they deem unacceptable.
Yes.
From the link:
“Mimi Alemayehou
Senior Vice President for Public – Private Partnership at Mastercard
Ms. Alemayehou, 51, has a career that spans both the public and private sectors across emerging markets.
She currently serves as Senior Vice President for Public – Private Partnership at Mastercard.
Prior to joining Mastercard, Ms. Alemayehou was the Managing Director and a Board member for investment platform Black Rhino Group, a portfolio company of Blackstone, where she focused on the development and acquisition of energy and infrastructure assets across Africa.
Ms. Alemayehou was previously appointed by President Obama to serve as Executive Vice President of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC).
During Ms. Alemayehou’s tenure from 2010 to 2014, OPIC’s portfolio grew by more than 24% to $18 billion and the corporation’s Africa portfolio tripled to nearly $4 billion.
Prior to OPIC, Ms. Alemayehou was appointed by President George W. Bush to serve as the United States Executive Director on the Board of Directors of the African Development Bank (AfDB).
She received a Distinguished Honor Award for her outstanding service in this role. Ms. Alemayehou has also launched entrepreneurial ventures in consulting.”
Elon Musk said he had a plan B
Probably C, D and extra outliers, to cover the deep weirdness that shadows Twitterdom. Looks like he jumped in this sarlacc pit with every intention of ‘winning’….however he defines a win. Go Elon.
Unfortunately the electric god doesn’t like free speech in China when it involves his crappy cars.
American electric car company Tesla has decided to sue a Chinese man for $650,000, claiming defamation following his victory against the automaker in a separate lawsuit, where he won $155,000.
Han Chao has posted images of legal documents that indicate Tesla is suing him for 5.05 million yuan, or around $650,000 for defamation. Tesla is also demanding a public apology, a strategy it has used in other defamation suits in China, where the company has been undergoing a very public attack on its products since the beginning of 2021.
The lawsuit’s basis seems to indicate that, following the closure of a previous case that saw Chao win more than 1 million yuan or around $155,00 from Tesla, Chao continued to defame the automaker on social media. Chao used terms such as “a quack,” calling Tesla a “rogue” and “rubbish” company following his victory.
Tesla has factories on 3 continents churning out electrics.
You note there’s one whineybaby, HanChao, in China?
So. . .
So the whineybaby doesn’t have the right to free speech? Then why should the electric god have free speech rights? WOW!!!
Honey if you knew anything about Tesla you would know that right now from the Tesla financials 90% of the electrid god’s profits FILED IN HIS FINANCIAL is FROM CHINA. The factory in China has been shut down for three weeks – COnnect the financial dots…… All of Elon’s riches are from Tesla stock… Connect the dots.
SURE A LOT ,of Musk is Bad trolls on this site lately./
Not as many as “Trump is done, we got him now, he can’t win, he makes bad decisions, bad advisors, etc, etc…He’s finished, the USA is gone, finished, it’s all finished!”
Or some such gibberish..
Proof my facts wrong: Tesla sues a Chinese Citizen for exercising their free speech and you back Elon Musk – JUST WOW!!!!
I could give a load of horse manure about the electric god. I am posting facts – facts that you don’t want to hear because you think Elon is the free speech god – HE IS NOT. Worshipping false gods there….
Could the Board be involved with criminal activity?
Seams like they are cheating the share holders.
RICO?
If it involves the Derp State that would be so by default, n’est-ce pas?
This is further evidence that underscores the primary purpose of Twitter is NOT to generate profits for shareholders, but rather to control speech & information flow across our society and directly affect what specific narratives are spread and amplified, and to catalog all users into ideological /social categories for future nefarious government control…
Build a new public square, eavesdrop, muzzle voices, disappear inconvenient persons or simply put them in a distant corner where they don’t even realize no one hears them, while giving megaphones to favored parties with suspicious motives and a penchant for persecution.
Yup, sounds like gooberment.
A corporation that is not designed to generate a profit can be dissolved. All Musk would need to do is wind up business or have a receiver appointed. In the interim the court could order free speech.
“to control speech & information flow across our” world.
Elon knows they cannot sell. Nobody owns this fake company. This is the 4th Branch caught with its pants down. He already mortally wounded the Twatter. Elon is twisting the shank now.🍿Snap it off.
Well, not exactly “nobody.” Lots of individual investors, directly or through mutual funds and ETFs.
So if there is a 3rd party who is providing a subsidy to this publicly held company and this has never been disclosed, would this be in anyway a element of fraud? And if so what happens then?
During discovery can Elon gain access to all email, texts and communications since they went public?
If so this could be where the real juice lies.
Hmmm.
Interesting, especially when taken with comments about possible conservative proxy groups vs. woke boards of directors.
They should have never taken it public if they were not going to run it as a proper public company. Why did they do that? Part of the disguise? Would that not be considered a giant fraud to do an IPO and sell shares and so forth but then not conduct it properly in re shareholders?
fiduciary – that is all about “trust”
So what do they do WITH the money that is invested by the public as shareholders?
To me, this is like the finding out about the missile silos in Cuba . . .
I feel in a mood to watch “Topaz” again, one of Hitchcock’s greatest movies that seemed to have gone unrecognized for what a great movie it was . . . like three movies in one . . . interesting part too about about spies in Paris working for NATO
I read that it has not gained any value since it went public, other than the bump when Elon made his purchase. It has been in existence for quite a while. I believe that would suggest shareholders are either in on the scam or are ghosts.
Only two options now for EM . . buy it or destroy it!
This is what he’s doing. If he actually got the company he could use it, wins either way. This is a case of sunlight being the best disinfectant. Current Twatter model is dead in the water.
If the directors have no stock financial interests…then who calls the shots?
Musk has exposed this fraud as a lib/left wing based platform to attack and limit free speech by those who are conservative/republican leaning etc. Not a financial vehicle…solely set up to attack DJT and muzzle the conservative voice.
Wow…have to give credit to the DS…they left no stone unturned to defeat our Lion. Between the ballot mules, dominion, impeachment and this…it shows how much they feared him.
BlackRock Inc, Vanguard, State Street Global Advisors, et al. They can shakedown any board as they own between 15-30% of just about every publicly traded company.
The CEO of BlackRock sits on the boards of the World Economic Forum, whose website states they have media partners to disseminate their agenda, and The Council of Foreign Relations.
Note that Vanguard, a private asset manager, increased their position as the number one shareholder of Twitter.
I mean, what’s it cost them? It’s ALL at taxpayer expense.
Our corporations have all underwent a hostile take over to one degree or another. Like everything else the left is not so good at building things. They are however quite adept at parasitic behavior. I’m quite certain since the start of the millennia or even before the carrot and the stick approach has been applied to all major institutions and companies. Do this and get this or else. The goal was to get as many people of theirs into high places. The diversity and inclusion tsars are like having an inside informant. It’s stakeholder capitalism.
Luke: The diversity and inclusion tsars are political commissars. They are committed communists, just like MaoBama. These political commissars now populate most of corporate America, all of academia, the entire healthcare system, local governments; you name it, the commissars are in place.
~804 million shares exist.
The 10 day trading volume exceeds these shares.
The Saudis claim to own 160 million and will buy more.
That triggered the poison pill unless they decide to selectively apply it to Musk.
Musk owned 9.2% but has not reported how many more he and ‘friends’ have acquired with is likely to exceed 200 million.
TRON owner just put in a bid at 60.
At least 1-4 new offers will be made next week and I believe the price will approach 100 and the reason being, Twitter holds the documents to put many liberals in jail.
This is all going to hit the fan in the following weeks. Be long and refuse to sell your shares until the highest bid is accepted.
https://redstate.com/mike_miller/2022/04/16/will-conservative-investors-now-become-shareholder-activists-and-battle-woke-boardrooms-n551142
A great article on how stockholders can hold businesses and their boards accountable.
It’s value therefore sho6 be a negative 69 cents$
Prove me wrong!
😂
That is the worse board I have ever seen and most are horrendous.
I don’t know about that…I’m sure Fei-Fei Li PHD is a financial rockstar…I didn’t want to leave out the PHD part. Probably should be CCP instead of PHD.
People who need to tell you how smart they are with their diploma status…usually aren’t that smart.
Are we sure this is not Swalwell’s commie girl friend Fang Fang?
“People who need to tell you how smart they are with their diploma status…usually aren’t that smart.” ~ #6
Yeah, well they do have BS, Piled High & Deep, PHD
Your hunch is correct re:CCP, but not Swalwell’s GF.
Why isn’t Hunter on the board of directors he is the smartest man FJB knows, gov owns some shares, and Musk kicked the nest of rats they can’t help themself to virtue signal for democracy censor style.
The reported math isn’t correct. Updating with newest data, see https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/TWTR/key-statistics
There are 763,580,000 shares outstanding, and from the list above, 0.12 % of the shares are owned by the board (not including Dorsey). That means that group owns about 916,296 shares…. at $45.08 per share, worth $41,306,623 yesterday.
Also, greater scrutiny should be, who are these members of the Twitter Board. For example who is this Li Fei Fei lady. Does Twatter have a Fang Fang problem? Spy? Has Swallow tapped into Fei Fei too? Looks like a shady lady. She was head of Googles AI Center in China.
Ben Tallmadge /Boycott CCP on Twitter: “Also behind the protests against Google’s Pentagon Maven Project is Li Fei Fei, a confirmed Thousand Talents recruit, currently sits on the Twatter board. But she didn’t mind heading the Google AI center in China. https://t.co/AD0c3cePgX” / Twitter
Chinese fangs are most certainly a problem.
Elon maybe in dangerous territory here: the void between capitalism and corporatism.
So how exactly are all our politicians so rich?
And Zuckerberg is a multi-billionaire by selling ads?
And the enormous national debt is no longer a worry?
Now this is socialism! (Hitler-style)
Hollywood can not come up with a better script. This story is getting more interesting each passing day.
Quick check shows about 809 million shares.
That list of director’s names looks like a list of office assignments next to the elevator at the UN.
The board’s a freak show. They need to add an Arch Duke Ferdinand, from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, Odd Job (the James Bond character), Mata Hari, Scooby-Doo, and Racer X.
Very Random bunch…very imaginative. I could come up with a similar board after a few cocktails…
The UN that includes the traitorous scumbags that control the Alphabet agencies of the US Grubermint and plus other world countries that are involved in the WEF, Great Reset, Climate Change, Covid and Build Back Better world domination plan.
Something is rotten in in this whole Twatter fiasco and it ain’t in Denmark. Just like all this Ukraine/ Russia BS, something smells.
Cash App, the popular cash-transfer app, is also owned by Square.
The Board reads like a who’s who manifest for an Ellis Island bound ship……………..
Where are the Jack Smiths, Sally Jones, et al types?
Like Twitter went out of their way to recruit people who are generationaly disconnected from the American experience.
So what happens if just 30% of the 100M MAGA strong buy a few shares and proxy them to Musk?
To break this down here is an example of this what if scenario & numbers:
800,000,000 shares outstanding
If 30,000,000 MAGA Patriots are interested and decide to buy in
51% of 800,000,000 = 408,000,000
408,000,000 less 73,600,000 shares Musk already owns = 334,400,000
334,400,000 divided by 30,000,000 = 11.14 shares
11 shares x $45.00 = $495 investment
Likewise:
If 15M choose to buy = 22 shares each
or
If 7,500,000 choose to buy in = 44 shares
or
If 3,750,000 choose to buy in = 89 shares
Sure seems very doable!
Monday might more interesting than normal.
Why would anyone MAGA want any type of ownership in this cesspool?
Buy stock in Trump’s new media company if you feel strongly about media and let Twitter die the death it deserves.
I’m interested in the truth coming out.
This is a big potential weak spot of the left which could expose much, that’s why.
There is no value in the Trump Social due to the bizops effing over the devops side of the business.. It suffers from management that does not understand the technology and thinks you can just use an off the shelf framework written in Ruby to stand up something needing to be bulletproof. Also..if you get censored for posting about the clotshot then what kind of free speech platform is that?
Stop doing the math it will never add up. Sundance points out the relevant fact. The guys who print the money control the company. Not only Twitter but every large scale information platform is controlled by the same small group. So perhaps under 1,000 people are starving, killing and abusing virtually everyone on the planet. This is what they do – they are evil and corrupt. The only way this ends well is these banksters are rounded up and put somewhere the sun don’t shine. Then maybe the rest of us can get on with our lives…maybe.
Curious as to the “same small group”.
Given what we have seen from the 2020 Election Steal…my money is on the financial kingpins of the Dim party.
Soros…Zuck et al…all of this was cooked up during the O presidency. What do the WH logs show for this period and we’ll find out.
I don’t think his intentions have been to buy twitter and make it better. I think he is trying to expose them.
Sounds like the nouveau riche woke group are those same brats who bit other kids in kindergarten.
The democratic mindset of the rabid shareholders is one of burning down their own house before stepping aside if they can’t make the payments. And since they have the least to lose, they are the most dangerous.
Everything about twitter is fake?
Something I figured out after a thousand likes vanished in 24 hours.
Something I figured out after seeing perpetual losers like the Krassenstein bros and something called Jeff Tiedrich always getting top billing following a Trump tweet.
Sans Dorsey, 77 measly shares? LOL! Musk is going to have a good time jerking Twitter around, whether he acquires them or not.
I own more than the frigging board members.
Let the ACTUAL stock holders vote.
Criminal.
The emperor has no clothes…
I wonder if Tom Fitton is thinking about submitting a FOIA seeking all documents with the words Twitter & Subsidy in them?
Besides the fact that Musk is a fascist in bed with the US and Chinese governments, besides the fact he is a trans humanist with a Messiah Complex, this entire Twitter debacle is a giant distraction.
Twitter is culturally important for one reason: news orgs and government use it as a propaganda outlet.
This will not change if Musk runs it. It won’t be “fairer”. Musk says the board isn’t representing the wishes of the shareholders. He laughs inside because Musk doesn’t respresent the wishes of the American people. He is simply increasing his brand.
So by all means worship this guy who is littering space with junk, manipulating the green movement into untold wealth, yet ruining the earth with his cars and helping CHina ascend.
A fair criticism.
The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend.
You speak truth. We’re always looking for heroes and when we think we found one we don’t face the truth about them. Musk is a secular humanist, albeit a brilliant one, with an incredible work ethic. There’s nothing green about going all electric, nothing green about batteries, yeah they store energy, but the manufacturing of them is certainly not green, etc. The idea of “creating” renewable energy actually doesn’t exist. Things like “harnessing the sun’s power” do exist.
What Musk needs is Jesus, and then to study up on how the Universe functions in God’s design, not making it after our own images. But, I digress.
If anything, his actions have exposed more publicly the connections in and around the state run and controlled media in a supposedly free country.
Musk says truth is important to him. Jesus said something about those who seek the truth. Do you recall? Ya’ all may be looking for heroes..a big mistake. I seek allies. You folks don’t seem to be tallying on the side of being good allies. You will eff up any plan doesn’t suit your myopically narrow supposedly conservative world view. Like you are the only ones suffering and want this crap to stop.
CIA shell company…
If I were Elon Musk, I would be contacting all the shareholders through a 3rd party or through different 3rd parties and offering to buy their stock at a premium or offering them equal stock in a re-designed Twitter under Musk’s ownership or getting a guarantee of their proxy vote on their shares of stock.
But admitted, I don’t know much about financial markets, so I’m sure he’s got a better solution in his plan B. It will be interesting to see what he does.
lol.. and I’m the deplorable…
Kinda begs the question: Do they have the resources to exercise the poison pill?
Per Zero Hedge, someone should probably advise employees “poison pill” is not literal
Kinda has a Jonestown vibe to it doesn’t it?
They do deal in a lot of Koolaid . . .
If anyone offers applesauce, turn it down.
After reading all these posts, I am now scared to hit Like on any comments and cost CT millions in server fees…
Years ago EM was forced to change the BOD. Originally he had at least 3 or 4?family members( brother, mother) In a settlement with the SEC he was urged to change 1 or 2.?