Yesterday, Rachael Rollins was confirmed by the Senate as Joe Biden’s selection to be the U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts {LINK}. Watch the former District Attorney Rachael Rollins previously respond to a local Boston media crew.
Watch what happened, and remember, this person is now the U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts:
https://youtu.be/5cfiCuKFVGc
The severe leftist disposition exhibited in that video was well known to the U.S. Senate prior to her confirmation hearings.
Texas Senator Ted Cruz highlighted and warned his peers about the danger that Mrs. Rollins’ worldview as district attorney represented if she was put into a position of significant authority. Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton also gave numerous warnings and for a time blocked the nomination.
Alas, eventually the Senate approved of Mrs. Rollins despite all the warnings. The Senate vote was a 50/50 tie. No Republicans voted to support Rachael Rollins, and Kamala Harris stepped in to break the tie.
Tom Cotton warning:
.
Ted Cruz Warning:
.
Unhinged!!
Extreme Paranoia never leads to anything good.
Especially when it’s backed up by extremist ideology.
It’s not paranoia. It’s a manufactured narrative.
The woman is definitely unhinged. But see, she’s a democrap and they’re allowed to be unhinged and they’re also allowed to think they’re more important, and that their children are more important, than anyone else.
She wants to call the police?? Ha, let her. I wanna see her face when they don’t/won’t/can’t respond.
She is a nutjob. Just what this country needs, another unhinged nutjob.
These people have created a tangled mess they can’t get out of.
Well, now we know what pushes her buttons. As long as nobody does anything illegal, push hard and fast and let her keep making a fool of herself.
lawless, anti-police district attorney, with a list 0f 15 crimes that will not be prosecuted threatening to call the police?
Not only call the police, but also make up an allegation. She actually said that, at least that’s how I took it. This woman is one scary, well, you can fill in the rest…
She just learned, albeit in her paranoia, “when seconds count, the police are only 15 minutes away.
Actually, maybe considerably longer, given the efforts SHE and her ilk have aimed at LE.
IF her delusions were justified, and instead of harmless reporters, these HAD been “White supremacist terrorists” bent on hurting her and her children, how comfortable would she have been with a 911 call, which dispatched Social workers?
so true! she has worked to degrade the legal system to allow criminals to escape justice under the guise of “social justice” and reparations.
If the reporters were on private property, I hope Ms. Rollins upholds property trespassing rights for ALL property owners. Not just Black women with children.
But she wont. She will gladly let BLM trample over private property if Whitey is the owner.
I bet its 12 months or less before this footage can be used to juxtapose one of her rulings.
She needed to excuse herself and say “Whoops!”
The reporter was not on private property…
How do you know it was not private?
Another poster said that she lives in an apartment and that was the complex’s parking lot. So not private property, of hers anyway.
Commercial property.
This is what Democrats give you, America.
Live in Oregon, south of Portland and believe me, my car knows better than to head NORTH.
I cannot take Black Trained Marxists seriously. These dupes weren’t told Herr Marx hated Africans.
Reporter should have stood her ground.
Wow, extreme paranoia and self-righteousness on STEROIDS!!
demanding what they will not provide for others.
That’s how they roll.
Don’t know what Smith’s Law is
Lol. WOW!
This idiot is qualified in one thing only, US attorney ain’t it.
Sorry. Just saw it down below. Never Mind
Every First Amendment Auditor on You Tube should go to this woman’s house.
Thank God we helped the communists win WWII, right? Always remember, the judeo-bolsheviks want YOU dead, your grandkids raped, and they think it’s funny.
Pete, there’s a well-known Persian saying: I wish for you a nice horse’s d**k up your *ss.
Nope, sorry, he’s right.
Massachusetts is nothing but a sh*thole, I’m so glad I left that place years ago.
This problem would not exist if the press did their job in the first place.
so true!
It looked as if the reporter stepped back into the street near the beginning. This means this arrogant woman is kicking the reporter off a public thoroughfare.
About 10 years ago I watched 3 relatives of a criminal shouting death threats to my neighbor who was on the jury. Our police said nothing could be done about it unless they came on the property.
Impossible to tell if it is a public ROW from the video.
Looked like a parking lot to an apartment complex to me.
Another Soros new hire
This story is misleading. This video is old and is from last year. Not even sure if it was about her potential nomination..
She is a nut job but just want the treehouse to get it right.
Please show evidence that supports your claim of the video being a 2020 video. The Fox25 YouTube video embedded above is dated today. Subject of her confirmation as US Attorney for Mass. is brand new, today.
Democrats are Fabian Socialists! Explains EVERYTHING, including all this racial madness ushered in by Obama!
An Obama referal for sure.
“Ill make an allegation”
“Ill get your name”
Dangerous threats of retaliation by someone who is deranged and possesses government power to destroy an innocent citizen.
That poor woman in Central Park got arrested, lost her Wall Street job, got evicted and her dog was taken away from her for a lot less and she wasn’t a United States Attorney!
Clueless……
I agree with every criticism of the $oro$ funded prosecutors, of coarse.
They enable career criminals, instead of impeding them.
Exactly the same thing the RNC does, with the DNC.
So, while I agree with what Cotton and Cruz say, about these prosecutors, so long as they make such “valient stands” in floor speeches, and ‘soundbite’ interviews on Faux, and don’t CLEARLY and Explicitly “call out” their own leadership, I simply don’t TRUST them, or BELIEVE them.
Its Kabuki theater, to establish their ‘bono fides’ to an enraged Republican base, that they have been “playing” for suckers, for YEARS.
IF Cotton or Cruz represented different states, they would not be making these speeches; its playing to “their base”, their percieved constituency, and its revolting.
Want to truly combat the Globalist “collectivist” attempt to rule the World, Senators?
EXPOSE the rot at the head of your own party, of STFU, your hypocritical grandstanding revolts me.
Cruz has actually stood up to everything this entire time, he voted no to joes electoral slates on Jan 6th and even was an attorney for a couple of the fraud cases for Trump.
First off, did she not expect reporters to know where she lived and do a stake out? What about the people that followed a Senator into the bathroom, yelling, with video?? And that was a white woman. This is not about color. This is about an out of control press with no respect for anyone or anything. That aside, if she was shocked that reporters were at her house… how naive is she? How could she possibly fulfill her role?? She spoke/cussed out the party line: “white people are evil and she is a poor black woman on the streets of America where it’s not safe because of white supremacy…” bla bla bla when BLM and Antifa have been stalking people, doxing people, for years now, threatening their lives and their families. Up is down. Black is White. Good is evil. Everything is upside down.
She’s a train wreck. The hypocrisy is neverending.
another thought – she took the opportunity to create a scene which would work toward her ends …making it seem she, and “her kids” were being violated …it’s all about the narrative. She might have professionally responded to the reporter but used her time to make it about “grievance”.
She’s just angry at the soaring cost of Martha’s Vineyard summer rentals.
This woman gave everyone the blueprint for how to make a difference with non-violent protests…
How much of an effect will this have on state systems? Can a red state reject her mandates?
She is a prosecutor not a judge.
She the federal DA for Massachusetts only.
Meaning if someone brings it to the federal court in Massachusetts she won’t prosecute. Most likely only if they’re Black.
Hopefully people will sue her into oblivion for racism and crimes against them.
She’s already going back on her own won’t charge for trespassing etc
Yet accuses the reporter of trespassing!
The current trajectory of staffing based on cultural marxism. It’s all ideology, race, and sex… This is far from the best this country can do. This is the last little bit of grease left at the bottom of the barrel that the dog missed. She is a burden not worth carrying.
Elections have consequences, stolen elections doubly so.
Wow!
100% BLM Marxist white hater. Just like the rest of the Democratic Party.
This should be saved in the event she prosecutes any white person in Massachusetts. A definite beneficiary of affirmative action.
Get the audio from her interviews on the Howie Carr show… she is all about restorative justice whatever that is… she is a divisive figure imho – SIGH
The DOJ has to go. There isn’t a scintilla of a chance for justice with racist people like her as DAs.
Wow, the moonbat who put in writing that trespassing, threats (including threats to children) and resisting arrests are not a crime any more is threatening a reporter with arrest for trespassing because it is endangering her children.
Cant make this up.
#FJB
Some people are more equal than others.
What could go wrong! Talk about a unhinged woman, er, person, er, activist.
There was a time when it was the reporters who shamed the beurocrats into running away. There was this thing they would do, it was called journalism. Sometimes I see reminders of it in old movies
Who owns them supports this woman. They best behave.
Will/can we recover from the obama third term
She hasn’t even started her job yet and she’s already threatening people with an abuse of her power.
She’s a black racist who will obviously bring race and color into her job.
I can understand not wanting reporters to come to her home, but the whole black woman vs white is so unrelated. These people truly believe everything has a racial motive or a consequence of race.
I don’t know if she believes it, but she intends to milk it for everything it is worth.
Do not make the mistake of thinking she is simply misinformed or delusional. Her rhetoric is a weapon, which she is very deliberately using.
She literally said trespassing won’t be prosecuted but said she was gonna call the cops for trespassing.
Someone with 2 horns on their head.
Don’t you wonder if SHE got her KIDS vaccinated under the mandate…..bet she did not..POISON…no grandchildren, death and heart attacks.
Folks should keep that video of her threatening to make false allegations and using her position of power to threaten citizens. This should make good evidence of her abusing her authority and using race to abuse her position. Folks should sue her up the Ying yang when she makes racist judgements.
I’m sure she thought it was okay when much worse was being done to Brett Kavanaugh’s family or Sarah Huckabee-Sanders family.
Lol, it’s the radical racist left who have been abusing peoples private property and personal spaces so it is funny to watch her in the other role. I remember when they sent mobs of black slugs too much on peoples private property and burn down their properties.
Why should her children be spared when other people are denied by leftist radical prosecutors. Suddenly she cares about children because they are her children.
Correction: when they sent mobs of black thugs to march on peoples private property……
She sounded quite Karenesque.
I detest ALL of the Republicans who were & have been silent about the coup d’etat of our republic. I believe they will all regret their cowardly non action. They are all guilty of treason.
The BIG surprise is that Suzy Q. Collins voted “Nay”!
Man, what a byotch. Talk about angry and a chip on the shoulder. I see the Senator from WVA voted to confirm her. Why anyone thinks he’s a bit of a blue dog is beyond me.
.
Setting aside her politics and ideological views which I oppose, this may be the first time I’ve ever disagreed with Sundance.
In Florida — the “government in the sunshine state” — we still seek to shield the home addresses of cops, prosecutors, and judges from easy public view.
This woman has every right to demand that [the universally crap] news media get out of her driveway and speak to her elsewhere, not expose her three middle-school-age daughters to the invasion of privacy or the possible danger of a disgruntled lunatic.
I hope she applies this perspective now to the rights of others to be safe, to have privacy, and to be free from harassment.
“[W]e still seek to shield the home addresses of cops, prosecutors, and judges from easy public view.”
The reporter stated clearly that the the attorney’s address is in the public realm.
.
Yes. I was only pointing out that the law in Florida even with its transparency rules still recognizes that there are potential dangers.
That the address was public does not make their behavior appropriate. That she was alarmed at this thoughtless behavior does not make her racializing the issue or her politics — or selfish hypocrisy — appropriate either.
We’ve seen plenty of these kinds of encroachments by the media and all of them are reprehensible.
While I see your point, this was not about the media. It was about her racism. Had she acted like a normal person it would not even be a story.
First she made it about her children in the house not being safe. If people in the parking area make her kids unsafe, she should have put a fence up to protect them. The fact that she did not makes her guilty of child endangerment or something!
Just a reminder, Trump couldn’t get his people approved because of dirty Tomitch Donnaconnel. But with a few exceptions, Bidens people all slide right into place. Trump is the only US President ever to have zero recess appointments. The senate went to exteme lengths to be sure they never recessed. Uniparty. Corrupt.
Indeed
Unfortunately I only got 1 upvote. This deserves 1,000
.
Yeah… you all have good points. I think maybe I was not looking at her behavior in total, and thinking about, e.g. Judge Salas, lawyers, others, who have had nutjobs take their venom out on their kids.
I was thinking about little girls in her house. And the useless media.
She’s vile, though. It’s an abominable appointment.
your general points are worth debating…no doubt we all have some level of mistrust about the nature of the toxic press …and the very real aspect that media will and has DOXED officials they hate.
but this isn’t that. at all
if this top cop doesn’t want the public to know her private home … maybe she should be advocating the state make it a CRIME for anyone to know it.
yeah…good luck with that.
no one is above the law… and no one below it.
pubic officials and press
equal in my opinion about the issue if public interest.
I suspect that the press has tried several times to get an interview with her about her nomination AT HER WORK, and had been denied…So they showed up at her house.
She’s avoiding any real exposure of her vile criminal tendencies.
Most prosecutors and judges in Florida live in gated/guarded communities just for the reasons you mentioned.
The thing is the reporter never showed the address or anything, kids weren’t out there so nobody knows the kids. All they showed was the woman and her vehicle.
She should be worried about her kids with the laws she isn’t going to charge people on. That puts her children in more danger than the reporter does.
MSM puts people’s actual address up etc. this reporter didn’t do that.
“We’re not living in Kansas anymore, Toto”
in totality, isn’t it a truth revealed about the character, demeanor of this public official also important?
the balancing act between protecting public officials from possible hostile actors and the need to inform the public is not easy to measure.
one cannot argue one demands more than the other.
and of this video is proof of that simple reality, I’m not sure what is.
we see top cop, alleging the press has zero discretion to determine time and place to ask an interview…and melts down in filthy votriole …conflating the pretext as some way to harm her children?
and then to THREATEN the press with arrest by police she has power over?
no…this is precisely why the press must have the discretion to form an interview at a time and place of it’s choosing.
would people be aware of the obvious unstable and emotionally weak character of this top cop, of not for this video?
the scene here was not a result of the press…it was the toxic and overbearing intolerance of a public official who should be expected AT ALL TIMES to behave as a normal professional and not go batshit stupid.
the question:. would the public get the opportunity to really see who this person is in the sterile controlled place and time of her own choosing? unlikely.
this video was important. it exposed this person to be unhinged and not to be trusted with top cop powers.
the child harm was invented…at no time did the press reveal the house address, children…
the claim of potential harm is dubious at best. it’s public record. of someone is interested in harming this person or her children it most certainly would not be dependent on this press.
in fact, the over the top race baiting ugly language she chose and the aggressive body language and threat to order her jack boots probably has causes more people to really dislike her. and that’s totally on this top cop.
Imagine if a journalist like O’Brien acted nice and only did interviews in those sterile official locations.
the press has a job to push.
and more now than ever I say.
go get em…go get em all.
stuff that mic in their faces everywhere they go… catch them doing shitty things and report it.
pubic people have less protections than ordinary citizens for a reason…they serve the people, not the other way around.
as long as the press isn’t CREATING or provoking it…got no problem.
I don’t see this press provoking anything other than an opportunity to ask some questions.
and that never even happened.
why would this person respond so aggressively?
is it perhaps because she knows she isn’t going to present well unless there are aides and staffers and security and the ideal environment she can control and manipulate to raise her stock?
The press didn’t mention the children either. This woman is going to have a meltdown if she’s at a press conference and gets asked an awkward question. It was completely appropriate to approach her at home when the incident they were asking her about took place when she was at the mall. But why would she think that they wouldn’t follow-up on an allegation a POC color made against her? She must think that only a white person would complain about her; the truth is, she’s a US Attorney so she’s no longer black, is she? That’s their rule.
Well the people of Massachusetts are going to be alarmed when they call the cops for a drug dealer trespassing on their property selling fentanyl to their children won’t be charged and if they resist arrest for the aforementioned they still won’t be charged. The reporter NEVER showed the woman’s address and the reporter clearly said she wasn’t going to the woman’s apartment.
This woman is going to get children and innocent people killed etc. she deserves to be doxed (even though she wasn’t)
So it’s okay for her to let others off the hook but if someone trespasses on her property (it’s actually public apartments) then she will have them arrested and she even said she will make up allegations and blamed it on race and the reporter being a White woman.
What’s the woman scared of, her own laws??
And yet, this is what her favorite group BLM does on a regular basis.
Turnabout is fair play.
I agree 100% with “outhouse counsel”! (I never thought I’d ever utter a sentence like that … especially sober!) Rollins is an especially monster A-wipe and doesn’t need any help to be even more so. Rollins is correct here which proves even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Leftists NEVER allow to anyone else the rights they demand for themselves.
.
Understood. Got it.
(It’s a great video for lawyers for others to use.)
While I totally agree with you on your point about keeping their home address private THAT is not the most important point of the video. Rather it was her racism on full display which confirms that they most racist segment of society area all on the political Left.
On your point though isn’t it ironic that it was Leftists who crossed that line several years ago all in the name of social justice in which I will bet she supported but now opposes it when she is the one under the microscope.
.
Okay. I’m re-thinking my first reaction.
Slimebag MSM show up at her house. Her kids might have been in the house but seeing how the land around their house is their YARD … it’s not a stretch to think they could have gone outside for whatever reason.
Every comment above me mentioned her “house” at the time I made my comment. I also saw in the picture the reporters car which means if that’s her house than that’s her driveway and the land around it … her yard.
If that’s an apartment building and that’s the apartment building’s parking lot than that’s public space and Rollins is out of line.
That being said, is it now OK for leftist media to do the exact same thing? I personally think the reporter should have caught Rollins elsewhere for a comment.
I think we all are doing the same.
great thing about CTH: we can have reasoned debate without going full retard and unleashing filthy votriole at one another.
imagine…just for a moment IF the colors were reversed here.
just hypothetically.
how many would have a different view?
when you trade places often it helps to digest what the real issue is.
in this case, I’m of the opinion we are seeing an unusual disdain from a public official toward the press. and the totally unprofessional and toxic self appointed entitlement to a privilege that does not and should not exist.
the press and pubic officials each have a special balance that the law does not specify.
and thank God it doesn’t.
for either.
when you enter public office you no longer have some of the reserved protections of privacy.
no matter WHAT THEY SAY, this is how it should be.
free speech is very complex.
the answer to the debate is of course, more speech…not less.
this public official obviously FEELS this new job allows her some privileged privacy.
it does not. it never has…the law is not on her side here.
as a top cop she should know this.
this is one of the dangers that has led to the estaishment of far reaching corruption.
the media has for far too long played nice and not fulfilled it’s role to push hard and find out who these people are.
I wouldn’t hold my breath outhouse……..
After living just north of Boston for over 18 years, I can tell you the Communist Commonwealth thinks nothing of doxxing conservatives with impunity. Public officials are fair game. There is no Constitutional argument against protesting in front of a public officials house and thereofre, a news crew waiting outside with legitimate intent to interview this racist, did nothing illegal. From what I saw the young black woman who was attempting to get a comment from Rollins was polite and ended up being verbally abused and falsely accused of targeting Rollins’ kids. No amount of rationalization protects these people.
Agree completely.
You missed her racist threats and Racial slurs at the white woman reporter and threatened to have her attacked by her position and or office or other law enforcemento ! That is what sundance was pointing out . Her radical racist agenda ! Thank you Again Sundance
The reporter looks Black to me. I slowed down the video to 1/4 speed and especially at 110 seconds to 123 seconds you can see her. Also, 99 – 104 and 07 – 09.
She made racist comments against the woman who contacted the police in the first place claiming media was only concerned because a white woman complained; the allegations were serious enough, impersonating a police officcer (by claiming she was going to write a ticket and hitting a siren, which is also an implication that she’s police.
She forgets that black privilege is canceled by working for the government; she’s officially a white man now.
Well you just made an excellent argument for why all addresses of public employees should be as available as your’s or mine.
The fact that we cannot trust one another is your point (despite the fact that you do not recognize it as such).
I don’t want you living in my country anymore; and I expect you don’t want to live in mine.
Good luck, where ever you relocate to. No need to provide a forwarding address.
She literally said that trespassing (yet she was gonna call the cops on her for trespassing on PUBLIC property) wouldn’t be prosecuted, they weren’t actually at her house they were by it someone said they seen her the reporter said she wasn’t going to go to her house. She never showed her address or what apartment she was in for that matter. This is woman is getting what she said she won’t prosecute.
Two youths inside her home are her nieces, ages 8 and 12. Rachel has one daughter, who is 17.
I learned this by doing a search to read about her family.
If she’s raising them, close enough to call them her kids; there’s no reason to believe that the news people are a threat to them though.
Here, there was no invasion of privacy; the parking area appeared to be common parking, rather than a private driveway and in any case, when you’re outside and visible you have no right of privacy. They’d have been within their rights to film the building.
Exactly right…looks like a communal parking lot to me. …Not HER private property, as she claimed.
What a freakin’ sweetheart…sarc
She seems nice!