In order for left-wing ideologues to continue advancing their ideological belief system, a system built upon intentional fraud, they must pretend not to know things. This truism is the inherent core of their hypocrisy.
For the past several years the ultra-progressive left have been selling a ridiculous narrative that multiple genders exist. Within that multi-gender worldview, men can get to compete in women’s sports and also get pregnant. They even changed the language of mother and father to “birthing person”. Wokeism and cultural Marxism are deployed against anyone who does not accept this assertion in society. When you challenge the progressive orthodoxy with intellectual argument, the response is always an emotional attack in defense of their unsustainable position. A case study in this exact outcome happened today during Jen Psaki’s press briefing.
The White House spokesperson accidentally (and very forcefully) took the public position today, that only two genders exist. WATCH:
.
Other revelations today include:
“My body my choice,” except forced vaccinations against you are okay.
Also, “my health status is dependent on your medical condition,” so, it’s okay to slap the cheeseburger out of your vaccinated hand – right?
Fear is at the core of modern liberalism, and love/trust is at the core of conservatism. Modern liberalism, most commonly evolved to leftism, is about control. Conservatism is about self-empowerment.
Control is a reaction to fear. Think in terms or politics and society – the fear behind liberalism is the fear that someone might withhold things (opportunities, money, whatever) from me, fear that if you live your life in a way I dislike that it might affect my life, fear that if you get that job, there will be nothing left for me. Fear that if you make tons of money, it’s means there’s less money out there for me. So people who believe in leftist ideologies seek control as a means of trying to create guarantees and safeguards against those circumstances they fear.
Modern “liberals”, leftists, try to control the world and people to enable their comfort and happiness. Which, as we know, is an endless quest. Trying to control others does nothing in the way of making oneself happy. By extension, voting in this mindset so that government can try to control others will also – shocking – not lead to a happier, more comfortable life.
The conservative (and moderate, independent, but for the sake of expediency, the conservative), on the other hand, relies on himself to meet his own needs. And the trade off of being free to live his life as he wishes is also understanding that he has to make peace with how you live yours. By extension, aware that he wants to be able to hold onto this liberty and freedom forever, the conservative votes accordingly, so that everyone can remain free and in charge of his or her own life.
But here’s the crucial difference, perhaps, particularly where misery on the left stems: The conservative does not worry, so to speak, about you. The conservative knows that you were born with the same access to self-love, self-empowerment, self-determination and self-reliance that we all were, no matter the circumstances into which you were born. (Think about the millions of people this country has allowed to crawl up from poverty into prosperity – the conservative KNOWS this is possible.) And the conservative believes that if you want prosperity, or a good job, or a good education, you can make it happen – but you have to work hard.
The conservative hopes and intends that the free markets bring you all of the affordable and positive opportunities and resources that you need. The conservative also knows that on the other side of that hard work is great reward – material and, more importantly, emotional, spiritual and mental.
The conservative understands that not only is it a waste of time to try to control you, it’s actually impossible. Humans were born to be free. And if we put a roadblock in front of you, you’ll find another way around it. So, we see attempts at control as a waste of resources, energy and time at best, and at worst, creating detrimental results that serve to hinder people’s upward mobility or teach dependence. We see much more efficiency, as well as endless opportunity, in leaving you to your own devices. And we want the same in return.
This is where modern democrats mis-view conservatives as heartless. But really, the conservative believes that there is one and one path only to sustainable success and independence – and that is self-empowerment. All other avenues – welfare, affirmative action, housing loans you can’t actually afford – ultimately risk doing a disservice to people as they teach dependence on special circumstances, the govt, or arbitrary assistance (that can disappear tomorrow). And the real danger – they will ALWAYS backfire, and leave the recipient in equally or more dire circumstances. Any false improvement will always expire.
The conservative believes in abundance. The liberal believes in scarcity.
The conservative believes man is born free and will be who he is, no matter what arbitrary limitations or rules are put on him. The leftist believes man is perfectible, and by extension, believes a society at large is perfectible, and command and control is justified in the quest to a “perfect” utopian society. (Sounds familiar!)
The conservative tends to be more faithful – and not necessarily in God, but in the ability of the individual to find great strength in himself (or from his God) to get what he needs and to be successful. Therefore, the conservative has an outlet for his fear and disappointment – trust and faith in something bigger.
The leftist believes the system must be perfected in order to enable success. Therefore, disappointment is channeled as anger and blame at the system. Voids are left to be filled by faith in the govt, which they surely then want to come in and “fix” things.
And therein lies the roots of love and fear respectively. For the conservative, when life presents great struggles, he knows he has the power to surmount them. Happiness stems from internal strength and perseverance. For the modern leftist, when life presents great struggles, the system failed, therefore they were at the mercy of a faulty system, and they believe that only when the system is fixed can their life improve. Happiness is built on systemic contingencies, which they will then seek to control or expect someone else to.
One blames himself. The other blames anyone and everyone but himself.
And there it is. There’s where the meanness comes from. The leftist ideology causes that person to cast anger at the world when things go wrong or appear “unfair.” He constantly chooses only to see the “injustices” – and that makes for a very miserable, mean, blame-casting existence.
One last point that we have seen over and over and over with many (not all) of our leftist friends: Extreme stinginess and cheapness.
In our conservative community growing up, we were always taught that you give when people are in need – make donations to the Red Cross when there’s an earthquake, donate to charity when you can afford it, etc. Even if it’s just $50 here and there – it’s the right thing to do. Conservatives see this as the responsibility that comes with gaining from the capitalistic system; if you happen to benefit greatly from the system, it’s your duty to give back.
The liberal, on the other hand, does not seem to share this same viewpoint, at least not in my experience. And perhaps I think this is linked to believing in scarcity, and that your dollar comes at the cost of mine. So it seems that liberals, on some level of consciousness, feel guilty about not being voluntarily charitable. Therefore, to write off their guilt, they outsource their “generosity” to the government by voting for wealth re-distributive policies. Thus, the liberal cheats himself of the joy and addictiveness of direct generosity. (Not to mention – re distributive policies ALWAYS end up dis-empowering those who they’re meant to help.)
However each of us got here, it’s probably a fact that we have the turmoil of those storms in common, perhaps some unease that we could share and always, we also find fresh ground to cover from day to day. We’re developing valuable relationships as we trust one another in our community in the woods. The chatting in the branches encourages, strengthens and equips for some serious walking.
We think the Treehouse is a good armory for those who doing long distance walking for the sake of our nation. We hope you’ll think so, too. Find yourself a good branch….or just pull up a rock to the campfire.
Good Lord in heaven Sundance, you’ve done it now. The next thing you’ll say is 2+2=5 is incorrect.
Silence!!
“There is nothing wrong with your transmission.
Do not attempt to adjust. We control all.
Sit quietly as we control all you see and hear.”
It could be.
It could be 7, 6 or any number you feel good about.
Not number 7. Seven is racist
Seven Costanza was a racist? 🙂
I suppose 007 is fine though.
StanH….There is no truth in the machinery of mathematics as such, only an endless series of tautologies. We say 2+2=4 and challenge the world to get around this “truth.” But bartenders get around this “truth” all the time; for 2 quarts of water plus 2 quarts of alcohol do not yield 4 quarts of highball, but something less. A chemical change shrinks the volume of the mixture. Therefore, 2+2=4 is a statement that may be true for one set of contextual data and untrue for another. Always examine the data. If the data are without tangible validity, mathematics may give you answers that scintillate with dazzling plausibilities, but sadly are worthless.
I see further study of epistemology in following this line of thought.
2 quarts + 2 quarts = 4 quarts.
If you keep the distinction between the quarts are you really adding them?
This reminds me of another attempt to ‘disprove’ the Truth of 2+2=4. – ‘If you add 2 apples & 2 oranges you don’t end up with 4 apples or 4 oranges.’
Of course you don’t, but you do get 4 fruits.
You are very wise Doggy. With this kind of logic, the future is certain. : )
Re “Therefore, 2+2=4 is a statement that may be true for one set of contextual data and untrue for another.”
Your argument might hold water; or, even a mixture of water and alcohol but for the fact that when someone says “2+2=4” everyone (except you?) KNOWS the reference is to simple math and has zero to do with bartenders, water, alcohol, or chemical reactions.
By the way, there’s a name for what you did there. It’s called…
sophistry:
1 : subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation
In other words, you can go on and on all you wish about bartenders, water, alcohol, or chemical reactions; but, the fact is that the NUMBER 2 + the NUMBER 2 will ALWAYS = the NUMBER 4. And, as you yourself admitted, the fact that “2 quarts of water plus 2 quarts of alcohol do not yield 4 quarts of highball, but something less” has zero to do with math; but rather, is due to a “chemical change [that] shrinks the volume of the mixture.”
Another way to say it is… You start out with 2 quarts of water and two quarts of alcohol; which, equals 4 quarts total. That math will always stand the test of time. The proof that there is no failure of the math is the fact that the total amount of liquid decreases ONLY when the water and alcohol is mixed; which, results in a chemical reaction. Ergo, the change in volume is due to a chemical reaction; not the math.
You proved my point: one context is, to use your example, 4 quarts total (before mixing); another context is less than 4 quarts (after mixing). My point remains valid — 2+2=4 is contextual.
She stated that two sexes exist, which is the scientific truth. Gender has to do with language and some languages do have more than two genders. Quit debasing the language by confusing gender for sex.
Gender are the characteristics of sex. As far as the characteristic of getting pregnant is concerned there are only two genders – either you can because you are female or you can’t because you are male.
It sounds like you are trying to play games with language.
“Gender” NEVER referred to human beings’ sexual anatomy or their “feelings”…. until only very recently.
This bastardization of the language came about purely through the efforts of the Left, as they steadily encroached upon our long-standing traditional Christian-based culture in order to undermine and subvert it, and destroy it’s dominance among western civilization.
First the Left had to normalize homosexuality, then pedophilia, and then declaring that people could express themselves as any one of multiple “genders” was their coup de grâce at completely confusing and fogging up the entire language and argument. They could not accomplish this using the word “sex” because that has always been strongly connected to anatomy in both fauna and flora. But their strategy has worked pretty well so far.
‘playing games with language’ is one of the Left’s main tactics. They would rarely get elected to anything, if they told the whole truth.
If they told the Truth the whole truth or wait they kicked God out of their platform in 2012 when Jug ears was running for President. That why the demonrats know no Truth.
guess that gets rid of the idea of tampon dispensers in the Men’s restroom…menses is a natural pre/post cursor to the ability to get pregnant
.
People don’r have “genders”. People have SEXes.
“Sex” refers to the role that the person has in reproduction. It is, perhaps, the ONLY “identity” that is not artificial or socially contrived (unlike “ethnicity”, “nationality”, “race”, “religion” etc.”)
Let’s be accurate. “Gender” — of which there are THREE (masculine, feminine, and neuter) is not a synonym for “sex”.
She’s an anti-trans Beeotch.
Men can get pregnant, and they DO have periods.
WTH do you think Boys Bathrooms in some High Schools are mandating Tampon Dispensors?
Sheesh.
I amabsolutly sure I cannot get pregnant but I am getting hot flashes from Eliguard.
You’ve hit Menopause, Bob.
No more pregnancies for you.
As many times as I’ve been exposed, I still haven’t gotten pregnant. But I have children! Funny how that works.
Men do have Periods, but you don’t see any of the Odvious Signs although They do have All the symptoms. (Humor)
Yay! Finally, someone utters facts.
Utters? That’s sexist!!!!
What, isn’t that the male cognitive organ?
Chris, in that vid, she frames it as tho “only WOMEN can get pregnant”.
And that is an outright LIE.
And she never used the words sex or sexes.
Those words were not used in the entire verbal exchange.
She stated the OBVIOUS.
“Lucy, you’re in big trouble now!” – Ricky Ricardo
It’s not just gender. Th3 left wants to erase male and female. We know gender norms in our society can differ from others but the left has muddied male and female to be gender and choice. That in fact being male or female is a choice. Then we get insanity like birthingppersons and awomen
All those waves of increasingly addled feminist political activism – –
In the great scheme of things, maybe it’s a speck of justice for the viciously abusive #MeToo movt.
But effectively terminating our Title IX opportunities in sports is beyond just retribution on a cosmic scale.
(Not to mention that it’s wholly unnatural.)
.
“Female” is a SEX. “Male” is a SEX.
A person who can give birth is a female, a woman. Even if she looks like a man, has cut off her breasts, has taken hormones and grown a heavy beard.
Only two genders is ridiculous.
There are more than that at the Pentagon alone.
Touche`
I was pretty sure ‘quisling” was a gender
So says the Job Description for Flag Rank.
You might be correct.
This is the latest known list of genders.
https://dudeasks.com/how-many-genders-are-there-in-2021/
Nah, just one.
Neuters.
I just LOVE this place! 🙂
You and me both.
Is that the new Killroy?
Yeah; knew it was coming, didn’t you: it’s the new Killjoy.
She must resign…STAT. We can’t have this kind of talk…What next only the humans with “innies” can have babies?
Great essay, as a person who climbed up, this hits home. It’s right over the target.
Thank you SD
@MattWalshBlog
·
One of the worst things about abortion is that it is a total inversion of parental responsibility. Parents are meant to sacrifice their lives for their children. In abortion, parents demand that their children sacrifice their own lives for them.
@MattWalshBlog
·
Lots of leftists today are insisting that the Texas abortion ban is an attack on women but seem to have forgotten that women don’t exist and literally anyone can get pregnant. You can’t have it both ways, dummies. Pick one lane of crazy or the other.
@MattWalshBlog
·
I have seen words like “devastating,” “tragic,” “infuriating,” and “catastrophic,” used this morning to describe a law that will simply allow more children to be born.
The left is anti-human, anti-life, anti-family, anti-child. And they don’t even try to hide it.
@MattWalshBlog
·
If you ever had any doubt about who the bad guys are, just look at leftists convulsing in spittle-flecked rage like demon possessed lunatics because fewer babies will be murdered in Texas. That should clarify things for you.
@MattWalshBlog
·
For the millionth time: abortion is not a matter of “reproductive rights.” By the time the abortion happens, reproduction has already occurred. Abortion kills the child that has been reproduced. It does not prevent him from being reproduced.
@MattWalshBlog
·
The pro-abortion folks are weeping and wailing tonight because fewer babies will be murdered in Texas.
These people are demonic. Pure evil. No other way to put it.
@LifeNewsHQ
·
Notice how it’s “birthing people” when they want to have babies but “women’s rights” when they don’t.
@LifeNewsHQ
·
Feminists say the Texas abortion ban is racist and pro-life people are white supremacists because so many black women have abortions.
But they’re the ones defending killing thousands of black babies.
Abortion clinic – a place where two people enter, but only one comes out alive.
Usually one comes out alive, not always.
Does this mean the remake of “My Three Son’s”, will actually be changed back from “Inseminator & Pronoun Offspring” ??? (can’t say “3”, cause all math and numbers are racist)
Excellent post and inclusion of several Covey principles (e.g. abundance mentality) and just for review here are the Seven Habits of Highly Effective People:
1: Be Proactive
2: Begin with the End in Mind
3: Put First Things First
4: Think Win/Win
5: Seek First to Understand, Then to Be Understood
6: Synergize
7: Sharpen the Saw
Self responsibility and setting priorities that reflect one’s abilities and circumstances.
8: Keep your powder dry.
I was thinking pitchforks and rope, but you’ve gone one better.
Conservative( classic liberal): “Nobody owes me anything”. Liberal( marxist) ” You owe me everything “.
Classic Irishman “I don’t owe you S•••!”
Someone on another thread posted China’s ban on “feminine” male characters in shows / movies.
Any chance this forceful declaration is to align with Master Pooh-Xi?
The ChiComms properly understand this lunacy is a bizarre religion that seeks their overthrow. I hate the Communists, but they are clear eyed about what the enemies of a stable society look and sound like.
I believe you’ve hit on something here.
Biden admin has gone full-on Commie now w/ their insistence that only women can get pregnant.
“100 Them March” Coming….
They’re angry, Biden Regime.
Corporatism is not an ambiguous dogma.
When the dust settles, what they believe will become manifest.
The State, the State, and did I mention, the State..
Big corporations will rule us.
Nationalism is overdue to come roaring back. They may not call it nationalism, or patriotism, but dissent will most definitely be outlawed.
Since China now owns our governing class, the most predominant form of dogma will be internationalism. Nationalism as Internationalism? That is exactly where we are now.
“Rollerball returns…” remember “JONATHON; JONATHON; JONATHON!” as James Caan bullied his way into infamy?
CORPORATISM is an age-old concept! It is the ‘1984’ of 2021.
My take on the left and from personal experience is that they all have a high degree of narcissism. Every thought is the product of informed, science based reasoning. I have met more than a few leftists who all state there is no such thing as a leftist. Their positions are simply a product of common sense and rational thought. It is, therefore, devoid of politics. This naturally means only those who disagree are engaged in politics.
You can point out the history of communism where it uses the exact same claims and imprisons people for psychological disorders because only crazy people would disapprove. Like water on a duck it has no effect.
The other aspect of the left is their identity is tied to their politics. For the left, politics has replaced religion as a defining character of who they are. This is self reinforcing as narcissists have no room for God and they project their inflated egos into that role. As such, every aspect of society is for them to judge and decide. And that leaves no room for messy things like private enterprise and market economies.
For people like that there can be no debate and no compromise. They mean to assert total, permanent control and they will not stop. They have to be stopped. And that takes collective opposition. Which is why we are on the verge of collapse.
God, do your thing. Leave a remnant if you can. Thanks. Man.
Jesus did say “If those days were not cut short [nobody was getting out alive].”
Matthew 24:22
Nothing pushes their buttons more than being skeptical of their “experts” or their “science truths”.
Conservatives are predisposed to trust authority. But not when we can all see authority being abused, the experts so often wrong and questionable “truths” used to further a political agenda.
The leftists I work with are arrogant and two seem to be narcissists. The manager’s wife is the worst. I work in a greenhouse. We grow plants for vegetation restoration. The manager’s wife never ever uses the common name for the plants……always uses the scientific name. To me that is showing off, and honestly she is not very bright, and she is a horrible horticulturist, her husband a step above her in horticulture. The program director is an arrogant airhead, and they hired a lefty soy boy college student as assistant manager who is a jerk, can do no wrong, and I get blamed for his screw ups. I stay because I need the job, and I play their games to keep my job. Not much work in my area for someone my age and health problems. I have been working there six years, the manager and wife have been there two years. They treat me like I am an idiot. They are do as we say, not as we do lefties.
It is exhausting working with Occult Sadist Democrats. What you described is correct.
…on the left and from personal experience is that they all have a high degree of narcissism. Every thought is the product of informed, science based reasoning.
…For the left, politics has replaced religion as a defining character of who they are.
……..
That’s why they say “science based reasoning” when they MEAN right and wrong, or good and bad.
Just about the best description of the two ends of the political spectrum I’ve read in a very very long time. Mega Kudos!
WRT the mention of charity and how the two “sides” see it. So accurate! I will note that Arthur Brooks did a comprehensive study about this several years ago [more than 10] and his research found that conservatives gave to charity at an average of 30% more than liberals…across the board in every economic demographic. He even found that conservatives donated blood more than 25% more often!
Liberals want to give to charity (i.e., gubmint programs) with OUR tax dollars not THEIR money
Each liberal will claim they are willing to pay ‘a little more’ in taxes for one charity or govt program. I have tried to pin down what ‘a little more’ is in reality.
Is it 40% federal income tax? 50%?
I never get a straight answer. I always get the deflection if the ‘rich’ should pay more in taxes.
“We” need to do this…
It is not who “We” are…
Whenever I hear a congresscritter or propagandist say “we” it signals theft…
About the use of the “We” word, I had a college Civics teacher who said this:
“Politicians have either a split personality or a tapeworm.”
The very wealthy commie dems do not give very much to charities, if at all. They make it appear as if they do. They use their money to buy politicians and judges.
I seem to recall a few years ago, perhaps when Biden was running with BHO, that Joe’s tax return revealed he gave a paltry percentage of his income (1 or 3, can’t remember) to charity. His answer? “We serve in other ways.”
I’ll just bet you do. Serve yourselves!
Or, in Psaki’s case, a few hours ago.
Thank you Sundance and Crew! This is why I settle here.
Liberals stingy? Yes, not uncommon. But actually, I have seen some liberals donate time and money to various causes. As long as the cause had the ultimate objective of replacing God with the state, and as long as they were certain someone would notice their efforts.
China is notoriously stingy.
2013:
“China may have wasted the chance to build goodwill in Southeast Asia with its relatively paltry donation to the Philippines in the wake of a devastating typhoon, especially with the United States sending an aircraft carrier and Japanramping up aid.
“The world’s second-largest economy is a growing investor in Southeast Asia, where it is vying with the United States and Japan for influence. But China’s assertiveness in pressing its claim to the disputed South China Sea has strained ties with several regional countries, most notably the Philippines.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-philippines-aid/chinas-meager-aid-to-the-philippines-could-dent-its-image-idUSBRE9AB0LM20131112
@TaylorRMarshall
·
If “men” can now “get pregnant” then abortion isn’t a “women’s issue”.
Pick one.
.
It isn’t a women’s issue.
The National Organization for Women website now considers itself to be an advocate for “accessible reproductive health care for all women and LGBTQIA+ people”. For everyone/thing but normal heterosexual men. Who presumably don’t need “reproductive health care”.
I am looking forward to the name-change to the National Organization for W+LGBTQIA+”
She will circle back on this one. For sure.
How can one be a “birthing person” if they never allow themselves to birth ?
Oooh nice shot!
They berthed.
They just didn’t take it to birth.
Baboom!
Wordman better look to his laurels.
So is “My Body, My Choice” back in play?
Ummm, Lemme Check…….
Protesters earlier outside the Texas capitol.
What a… unique… group of people they are
Pfffft, they can keep’em!
Umm I dunno but methinks these “ladies” have nothin to worry about.
More evidence that would suggest liberalism is a mental disorder.
This is the same group that would hold a person down in unison to administer a life saving vaccine to them for the persons own good.
When I first saw them I thought they were the dunkin doughnuts brigade.
There may be some trademark infringement here but I’m not wanting to dive into it.
dunkin doughnuts is one of the good companies that support MAGA btw…. just saying.
https://www.cancelthiscompany.com/index.html
They would have taken a knee but they couldn’t get up.
An attempt at reverse psychology?
2 AM leftovers in a dark bar.
2 AM leftovers in a dark bar……..in Tijuana
Another paid for on call protest, commie actors on call, probably by Soros. Not organic, they have matching t-shirts with printed message, rehearsed routine.
She was in a mood today. Love to see it
Kick her again!
Abusive Relationship (THE ANALOGY OF THE OBVIOUS)
https://tv.gab.com/channel/lesane13/view/abusive-relationship-the-analogy-of-the-61295ae517161364e7d20fad
Insure that women have access to health care?? WTF? Pregnancy is neither an illness nor a disease and an abortion is not a treatment for either. Better these women need reproductive counseling or mandatory sex education….Jen is right: Men can’t get pregnant, but if we could we would make damned sure that the situations that result in pregnancy never happened unless we were prepared for the possibility of pregnancy…that’s just the way we roll.
When I get to the Pearly Gates, I have one question I want answered.
How did a concept called multiple different”genders”, that not 1 person in 20 supports, that would fail in a heap at a US national plebiscite, ever get to be National Bureaucratic policy in education ?
From Grade school to University unelected bureaucrats are able to rain neo-marxist ideology on a population who would never, ever vote for such a corruption.
Because no one in a position of authority can make a pragmatic decision without getting harangued or fired, and those who became the new generation of decision makers learned that anything goes.
Everything SD writes here is correct. From my perspective the denial of GOD in the leftist doctrine seems to be fundamental to their extreme unhappiness. Always attempting to fill the God created human void in all humans demonstrates their need to put their faith in anything but the Creator. Their profound emptiness stems largely from the void God created for Himself in humans with anything they can get their minds around. There in lies the problem. They are still the created whether or not they can acknowledge it. They make the government their god. Sure as human nature itself to fail them. Much like all ideology.
Well put! Great explanation. This should be required reading for kids as well as adults.
The Dictatorship of The Middle School Cool Kids Mafia is incapable of any awareness outside the Hive Mind.
Other realities simply do not exist to them.
Think that ALL the way through!
Government by Middle Schoolers, what the Japanese call Chūnibyō.
With their hands glued to EVERY SINGLE LEVER OF POWER in America.
No teacher, no parent, no adult is coming to save you.
Only you can save you, and you have no access to the levers of power.
What can you do?
Will you?
Will you grease the Toddler with the Gun?
I would like to make three points.
1 Texas law did not ban abortion. Any person who wanted to get an abortion in Texas today was not prevented from doing so by this new law.
2 The supreme court did not signal anything by not issuing an order barring it’s implementation. If anything they played along with liberals to make this a 2022 issue. Liberals think it is a homerun.
3 Squirrel
Texas should amend its criminal laws to define killing a viable, living fetus, as murder.
That would make an interesting complexity for the Supreme and other Courts.
Can a State define and punish murder?
”My body. My choice”…until it comes to “vaccines”. These people are demented.
If there was ever any doubt that elections have consequences— Instead of the best president ever and the fantastic Kayleigh McEnany, we’re stuck with an Alzheimer’s patient and this lying scum Psaki sock puppet.
Not so much election consequences as the Fruits of a Coup Conducted by Fraudulent Balloting.
Can the pResident’s spokescrunt be impeached? At least canceled? She makes me nauseous when I hear her/she/it speak. Its only worth is to make sure the “last” button on the remote works.
Great piece Sundance. Great comments fellow treepers. All I can add is liberals are HYPOCRITES!
@ajzeigler
·
On Twitter, I learned that I am responsible for preventing those around me from contracting a contagious virus, but I am not responsible for the consequences of choosing to have sex.
Which seems to suggest it IS OK for you to prevent those around you from contracting a pregnancy.
I think they just gave you the right to put condoms on all your neighbors.
eww……
This is the same maladministration that stole the Women’s Vote & Voice in 2020. It only took them 100 years, if that.
And who traffics little girls across the border every day.
And gets off on sniffing their hair and pinching their nipples.
@RichardHanania
· 17h
You can’t screen for Down syndrome before about 10 weeks, and something like 80% of Down syndrome fetuses are aborted. If red states ban abortion, we could see a world where they have five times as many children with Down syndrome, and similar numbers for other disabilities.
@JesseKellyDC
·
I do not wish to share a nation with those who think people who have Down syndrome are some disease that needs to be eradicated.
I’d rather be around Down syndrome people all day long than spend 5 minutes with these monsters.
Late 90s Duke University’s Premier Ethicist, Stanley Hauerwas, pointed out The Logic of Abortion would be used to Justify Euthanasia.
Trust me, if Jen Psaki’s job was ever challenged by someone more “woke” and she got pushed aside (like many people in this country have experience), just watch how fast she’d think twice about the ideology of conservatives.
These people want to push YOU aside but don’t think about disrupting their lives. You can’t do that to THEM because, gosh, they’ve worked so HARD to get where they are!
The really amusing thing is she thought this question was about abortion but she unknowingly admitted women get pregnant. Only women.
God that was a magnificent thing to watch.
we no longer have a free market
Great piece, Sundance!
Truly right on point for where this country is as we look across ‘the divide’ at each other…..the two opposing sides…with one (imho) blinded by either ignorance, indoctrination, self loathing or some combination of the three….and the other trying so mightily to keep ‘the light’ burning bright….
The latter must stay undeterred, retain its strength of conviction, withstand all ignomany and disgrace falsely heaped upon it….it simply must.
On a separate topic…has anyone noticed that simultaneous to the collapse of Afghanistan, HBO is repeatedly placing in its line up a movie I have heretofore rarely if ever seen….to wit….’Obama: In Pursuit of a More Perfect Union’
Curious lineup placement…what is that shadow govt POS O. up to???? His crazed lust and unquenched thirst for power is rattling the gates….
“not only is it a waste of time to try to control you, it’s actually impossible.”
I donno… China seems to be doing a pretty good job.
Australia and New Zealand aren’t that far behind.
They’ve controlled a heck of a lot for us here in the States over the last year or so.
That premise is about to be tested.
Not to be too catty, but that girl’s voice is in an awfully low register.
“Her voice was ever soft,
Gentle, and low, an excellent thing in woman.”
King Lear, Act 5, Scene 3.
Not like that though.
There are only 2 genders according to Mao Tse Tung – Male and Abortion
Orange woman ….BAD AND EVIL
ELO
While looking for CS Lewis’ observations on the Difference Between Gender and Sex where he says “God is masculine (not male) in a sense that renders everything else feminine by comparison”
I came across this:
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”
C S Lewis
“omnipotent moral busybodies”
Yup, that’s what we got.
Grateful to be sitting on one of the Treehouse branches with all!
I love the friends I have gathered together on this thin raft….
The only reason she is doing this is because of the texas Abortion law….
…and downward trending polling.
The spokes person did not believe what she claimed (multi….) yesterday,
nor what is claimed ( 2 ) today.
But, there is interest in ‘perceived’ favorable polling ( by whomever)…and as such anything is a go as what to say for fictuonal narrative makers by fibbers ( and not believe )
fwiw, not much
Some catch on to the fictional story tellers quicker than others.
( did the pres. or vp make a trip to hurricane Ida? Remember how the media would mis characterize a pres. level of caring for people if the Pres. did not immediately fly to a flooded out community)?
Hmmm…