In a disappointing majority decision announced shortly before 6:30pm Friday evening, a majority of Supreme Court justices refused to take up a Texas lawsuit challenging four states in the 2020 election.
The court, with two dissenting options by Justice Alito and Justice Thomas, stated that Texas lacked a legal right to sue and did not have a legal interest in how other states carried out their elections.
The court rejected the Texas’ lawsuit without considering the specific merits of the state’s case.
Texas had asked the court to delay the official vote of the Electoral College, scheduled for Monday, Dec. 14, or prevent the four states from casting votes in the Electoral College for Biden. Justice Alito filed a short statement regarding the court’s disposition of the case and was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas.
The position of the Supreme Court raises an important question that now sits unresolved. If an individual citizen is determined not to have standing to challenge an election result; and if a group of citizens represented by their interest in a state, any state, is also denied standing to challenge an election result; then who can constitutionally challenge an election, any election, that is mired in controversy and demonstrable evidence of fraud?
From the Alliance:
- An individual voter does not have standing to sue for election misconduct. (He/she is only one person and everyone cannot sue all the time for all elections.)
- An official who may be adversely affected, cannot sue before an election in anticipation of bad conduct because it is speculative (not ripe)
- An official who was adversely affected, cannot sue after an election claiming bad conduct because it is too late (latches)
- A state does not have standing to sue on behalf of its citizens to remedy other states’ bad election conduct (no standing)
The result appears to be that no lawsuit involving the recent election cycle has been heard on the merits. Insofar as I am aware, the substance of misconduct claims have not been heard in court. (In fairness, there has been no decision on whether a state can sue itself for election misconduct.)
The U.S.S.C has created a constitutional right to abortion from emanations and penumbras. It has told us there is latitude to provide jobs and college admissions based on race or sex. The high court has created a constitutional right to burn the flag.
The Supreme Court, and other courts, have determined limits on constitutional rights to: free speech, bearing arms, freedom of assembly, religious worship, who can use which bathroom, whether the state can hang a murderer; whether men can compete in women’s sports; whether you can operate a restaurant, how hot your coffee can be, etc. ad nauseum.
However, when it comes to the citizen’s right to make sure his or her vote counts and is not nullified by corrupt and dishonest practices, the courts have decided that it is imperative they restrain themselves from taking a position on the merits.
They have thoughtfully informed us of constraints on them that no-one knew existed. The Friday ruling cites only a conclusion, but no reasoning.
If a state sues, is it not representing its citizens? Isn’t that, at the root, the only function of a state government? Are the citizens’ rights to an honest vote not affected if another state runs a bogus election and the first state’s votes become nullified?
Does a state not have standing to sue because the court anticipates it will not succeed on the merits? Why do courts ever bother to write legal opinions when they can save time and tell us the outcome they have in mind right away?
My untutored mind is having difficulty figuring out just who, and under what circumstances, has a legal right to a fair election.
It seems the current answer is: no-one.
“A passionate, tumultuous age overturns everything, turns everything upside down; but a revolutionary age that is at the same time passionless and reflective leaves everything standing, but cunningly empties it of significance.” — Kierkegaard
It seems, friends, that we are leaving a passionless revolutionary age and entering a passionate, tumultuous one.
Might is Right. So says the United States Supreme Court.
If by criminal means, the votes of honest Americans are swamped by manufactured dishonest votes, then “standing” alone is the sword by which the honest are slaughtered.
On January 20th, this nation will become ungovernable.
The only answer is to cheat back, harder. There are no bounds anymore, because there are no repercussions.
Ungovernable is their goal?
At that point; the Republic is gone and we become a tyrannical dictatorship…And a non-benevolent one at that!
…and what about President Trump’s Executive order from September, 2018 about foreign election interference? Is it true DNI Ratcliff will be presenting his assessment next week to the President…..and others in the Executive branch, including the new Secretary of Defense??
Rabbit hole. An executive order isn’t going to stop the processes underway.
Would tend to agree. Just more hope porn.
Seems Ratcliffe report too late electors picked on Monday the 14th. Seems if they had evidence they would do it before Monday. No need to wait till the 18th.
And then when the electors are present..what then?
Who can challenge them? Can they be challenged?
At that time can just ONE person make a stand and an objection within Congress?
Ah….this is just beginning to start. Buckle up!
They must be certified by the Congress. Without that; there are no certified elector votes.
not too sure that “trust the plan” is going to fly any more.
I found this helpful, Mikie. It explains it well. (Hat tip 2 Genie for the link)
Leigh Dundas On The Effect Of A 2018 Trump Executive Order On The 2020 Presidential Election – YouTube
Thanks for that link. That was really interesting!
We have to prove the mass voter fraud first.
The blood is on the floor, the body has been incinerated, and the Diversion Crew says “where is the evidence” of which we erased?
That is a Demented Party/Deep State mugs game.
That has already been proven ‘well’ beyond a reasonable doubt, via what must be almost a thousand affidavits; signed by brave Patriots all at this point. Further the scale and scope of the election fraud is more than sufficient to reverse this election in favor of the ‘We the People’s’ President.
The DNI will hopefully reveal soon that it was a voter fraud on a massive scale funded and orchestrated by foreign powers intent on installing a true Manchurian President that is corrupted beyond belief. The drooling vegetable; what the Pravada MSM calls Joe Biden; but likely can’t even put his pants on in the morning let alone run the USA.
On the side of light we have +100 million citizens that voted for the People’s President in overwhelming numbers; Reagan 1984 landslide numbers, minus the ballot stuffing and vote flipping. The only question I have is where the loyalties of the rank and file military commanders are (hopefully the new Sec. of Defense has made good use of his time)? Will they follow their oaths to the Constitution or side with the CCP and George Soros and his ilk?
Just like the 1775 we need a miracle that only God can provide; namely men and women who stand and fight, as they did at the Concord bridge; this is as far as you as you go and no further, useful idiots of Satan. In fact scene below comes to mind. Far better that we go to God as Patriots than Traitors to the same.
As with all things though, if God has seen enough in terms of who should join him in heaven vs those among us that will join Satan in hell, I fully understand, I’m good either way, God’s will be done.
After all the Marxist we fight against are active and/or complicit in the murdered over 60 million babies in just the USA alone at this point; the CCP more besides and even now the Davo’s globalist blood lust is still not satisfied. I wouldn’t be surprised in the least if God calls game over at this point, wouldn’t you?
Regardless of how this all plays, out never lose your faith in God or your fellow Patriots that stand to the left and right of you. We always win no matter what.
Fear of Democrat wins in GA on Jan 5, resulting in a Democrat senate and then a packing of the court.
Understandable. Dishonorable and cowardly, but understandable.
Barrett, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch – 3 Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing!! Roberts the Emperor with No Clothes.
Standing or No Standing…. https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-3/29-suits-between-two-or-more-states.html
If you read the entire article to the link one thinks SCOTUS merely ran it repeatedly through a washing machine as time passed.
It was always going to be the military. If SCOTUS ruled for Trump, the left would have instantly attacked the Court as aligned with Trump. Same with the DOJ.
OTOH, no one will get away with calling out the military, especially when the Chairman of the JCS has said the military will not interfere in the election AND gave a commencement speech to West Point reiterating that the military’s oath is to the Constitution and not to the President or any other entity.
Once the evidence comes out that the election was subject to MASSIVE foreign interference and Congress/incoming Biden Administration is riddled with Chinese agents, the military will act to restore the Republic.
No other outcome would be politically palatable.
A
It’s obvious to me that marshal law is coming.
The question is, will Donald Trump impose it before he’s illegally forced out, or will a new administration impose it after they illegally take power?
But – – – no question in my mind that it’s coming.
Bank accounts frozen, internet off line, TV / radio interrupted, vital supply lines disrupted.
I’m proceeding on this assumption.
That E.O. Trump signed before the election ever began is going to come into play very soon now.
Texas talking secession and patriots talking tree irrigation – powers that be won’t let that go unanswered.
Get ready.
Martial law, @Sundance user
that was supposed to read “at admin user” sorry, sundance
I thought I might be spelling it wrong – thanks!
If only Marshal Law or even The Man With No Name were actually riding to the rescue.
For now it’s lead, follow or get out of the way.
Dems in the House don’t want Republicans who supported this to be seated. Oh unity! Going to be a rough year coming up.
My thoughts would be Insurrection Act.
Abe Lincoln used it. Might be the way President Trump goes!
We are running out of options to save the Republic from the CCP invasion.
I believe Lincoln used the Insurrection act coupled with limited Martial Law.
Et tu, Brute?
If this does mean the Biteme will be President, the Right side of the aisle should do nothing to assist in his departure though non-elective means. If the Left wants to use the 25th amendment, the right side should support the President, or at least not provide the needed super majority in the legislature. They wanted Biteme, let them keep him and not let Cathouse Harris ascend to the top.
With the first Executive Order, the Senate should sue to block. This is the attempt to gain back control of the law making process that has gone so far astray.
The only way Biteme should leave is by vote or his resignation. Not other means. He would help the Right regain the House and keep the senate.
Agree. She is worse than he.
there are no “sides”. Red blue puppet show. With a handful of Trump supporting exceptions and the exception of Trump himself there is an oligarchy who simply want to continue to live well in the ruins of a post-nationalist America until the next big scam begins somewhere else.
Subversion can only be stopped by military force.
Where do we get those “Not My President” signs, posters, bumper stickers, t-shirts? Suck your “unity”, Bozo Biden.
If unconstitutional actions are not in the purview of the Supreme Court, then let President Trump declare the electoral college vote null and void due to fraudulent electors being present. Then let them take that action to the Supreme court. Maybe they’ll decide they should hear the case then.
I have been saying this since TX filed its suit. TX has no interest in how PaGaMiWi allocates its electors. That is up to PaGaMiWi. The PaGaMiWi legislatures have plenary power to allocate those electors however they fancy. If the PaGaMiWi legislatures had any problem with their elections and/or their electors going to Biden, they had an easy remedy — just reclaim their right to allocate their electors.
How was SCOTUS to interpret the PaGaMiWi legislatures’ failure to do anything? Those legislatures apparently had no problem with how the elections were conducted, they had no problem with the result, they had no problem with the electors going to Biden, and they had no problem with Biden becoming President. That is the only way to view the PaGaMiWi legislatures’ failure to act.
If the PaGaMiWi legislatures are fine with their elections, who is TX to complain? and who is SCOTUS to interfere? This is entirely on the GOP dominated PaGaMiWi legislatures. This is where your anger should be focus. This is where team Trump should have focused its political pressure and political capital since 11/4.
I tend to think that if Trump started holding rallies shortly after 11/3 in PaGaMiWi and focusing his supporters on pressuring their state legislatures to hold hearings, find maladministration of the elections and fraud, overturn the election, and appoint the Trump electors, we would have been much better off. Instead Trump was practically invisible for a crucial month and a day, while Trump’s surrogates dabbled in conspiracy theories and dubious fund raising.
You make a good point, but unfortunately you would have us dependent upon the intelligence and honor of Republican politicians – in which case we’re hosed.
tommylotto says: “If the PaGaMiWi legislatures are fine with their elections, who is TX to complain? and who is SCOTUS to interfere? This is entirely on the GOP dominated PaGaMiWi legislatures.”
I vehemently disagree with that.
When “State *A*” runs its NATIONAL election fraudulenty; then the citizens of ALL THE OTHER STATES are being disenfranchised by that fraud.
It MOST CERTAINLY effects the citizens of other states when “State *A*” allows such fraud; as their votes are diluted, offset, or cancelled-out by the fraudulent votes of “State *A*”.
How anyone cannot see that is beyond a mystery to me.
But there you have it – people posting that don’t see it; the SC apparently doesn’t see it. Yet it is so obvious it smacks you in the face.
We’re living in the Twilight Zone. Or, alternately, in a TYRANNY.
I see it, and I’m sticking with it.
The GOP legislature in PA has majority, but not veto proof majority against the Democrat governor. The state Judiciary is also Democrat dominated, at least the enough to make up any election law they want. So, the Legislature cannot pass the law to return elective power to the Legislature, so we the citizens are trapped. And, it the Dems are known to cheat, they will never lose the Gov office again.
Not true. The Constitution gives the power to appoint electors to the “Legislatures” of the various states, not to the “States” themselves. If the power was given to the “States” then you would need a formal law signed by the governor, but since the power was given to the “Legislature” itself, the state legislatures do NOT need the governor’s signature. They do not need a court “by your leave.” A majority of the GOP dominated legislatures only need to pass a resolution among themselves awarding the electors to Trump.
Easy peasy, lemon squeezy.
Yes this is true, but based on the recent PA Rep letter, only about 80% of Republicans are Patriotic and follow their oaths of office. The rest of the so called ‘Republicans’ are either cowards, corrupted or actually marxists. Also important safety tip ‘no’ Democrats (ie Marxists all) have ‘ever’ signed on to such a letter in any State in the Union that I know of.
This was always headed for Congress. 3 – 4 days ago this case was not even known about!
It doesn’t change anything..other than other states putting the corrupt states on notice and calling out their B.S.
Disappointed in Supreme Court..yes I am. It would have given us an easier path.
There are many other paths to follow…so we remember what the Supreme Court said.. find another path..and go to victory on that one!
My goodness my faith in this hasn’t faltered…we will win! This is just a bump in the path!
Don’t ever feel defeated…no matter what the nay sayers spout! They Want us to feel defeated!
Nope..not me. Going to
Keep Fighting!
Correct, say the government’s of WI, MI GA and PA, are completely compromised via bribery and fraud by; I don’t know, say the CCP and Soros among others. I know a stretch, but go with it (sarc).
Does the Constitution ‘require’ that the rest of the States, who followed the Constitutional contract, be ruled by CCP run States who don’t? You know the Constitution that ‘requires’ that all ‘legal’ citizens determine who representants them. Such a novel concept, We the People actually choosing who represents us, now that is crazy talk. Right CCP SCOTUS? Pure crazy talk you Traitors. These States have ‘no’ standing?; you pathetic souls all, at least seven of you anyway.
Fix this or the Marxist will make you all irrelevant, all +25 of you will be clapping for 30 minutes or more, for some CCP installed dear leader very soon. Complete cowards.
I agree, but is the Constitution truly ‘silent’ on a State that becomes effectively a non-constitutional marxist dictatorship? Let’s say +270 electoral college votes originate from Marxist run states (for example like right now); do all the other States, that followed the Constitution, need to agree to the President the Marxist States choose?
Remember the Constitution is in fact a ‘contract’. First between “We the People” and our ‘Representatives’ but ‘also’ between the ‘States’. Violation of any contract by either party makes it null and void by definition.
It also didn’t help when legislators from the defendant states attempted to be amici to the Texas side. In essence, they were asking SCOTUS to tell them to do what they themselves can already do. Their filing helped in showing the disingenuousness of those legislators. If they believe their election was not conducted in accordance with their direction, then they should act. Not wait to be told by someone else to do it. This is the typical feigned outrage actions of the uniparty.
In regards to the case itself, I had thought that SCOTUS would reject it under the ripeness aspect – not for lack of standing. It was not unnoticed that they substituted their own prayer for relief in their rejection. In essence, SCOTUS rejected the case using a false claim that Texas was seeking to tell another state how to run their election. That is not what they asked – they asked SCOTUS to tell the other states to run their election per the defendant state’s own rules. While the two can be deemed similar, they are quite distinct in a legal sense. Since the media will cover for them, they don’t care.
With that, I too echo the sentiments from the original post above – the courts, similar to the other branches, are neglecting to fulfill their duties. Just like the FBI, local school boards, Secretary of States, Governors, legislators, etc. – all of them. Few beyond our current POTUS actually are taking their responsibilities seriously. ‘I was only responsible for signing it – by law I was required to sign it; but, I’m not responsible for the information in the document I had to sign. I can’t be held accountable for all the fraudulent aspects of that document. That was done by the underlings who can’t be named.’
I’m starting to digress and to help get my blood pressure back in check, I need to get back on topic… In regards to ripeness, I still saw two possible aspects. As noted above, the legislatures of the respective states could still act by declaring the elections void – and proceeding accordingly. The other, is the electors can still be contested though Congress. My cynicism tells me that even if either of these steps are taken, the uniparty would still win. Then of course, once Congress acts – courts would then claim the laches aspect would have immediately kicked in and it’d be too late.
First it’s too soon. Then it’s too late. There is no Goldilocks time where it’s just right. We now have all three branches that have in essence declared that the compact of the Constitution is now voided between them and the people by allowing this fraudulent activity to occur.
The PA Speaker of the House and Majority Leader joined the TX suit…Against PA?
Fait accompli. Democracy in the USA is worthless.
I look for DNO Ratcliffe to come forward with his report indicating THERE WAS foreign interference in the election.
At that point PT can enact the Insurrection Act and some level of Martial law within the next few days to round up those who have committed treason by aiding a foreign power in a fraudulent election while also positioning Special Ops in key cities to put down any leftist uprising.
I also look for PT to invoke EO13484 to confiscate assets of those involved in this fraud and coup and shut down some of the Big Tech players.
And finally I look for PT to use the 14th Amendment Section 3 to ensure those who may have participated in this coup are never seated in any office going forward.
I believe PT has used Cyber Command and the Military to acquire the necessary evidence and the communications of this treasonous coup attempt on our country and will be sharing that evidence with Americans soon.
At this point, this is the only way to arrest the traitors, expose the evidence of foreign interference and massive election fraud while also restoring the rule of law and saving this Republic.
He either acts now or this Republic is OVER. There is no next time and I believe he understands this but wanted to give the SC every opportunity to see the evidence and the merits of the case.
They bailed because they CAN’T allow the evidence to be seen. It’s as simple as that.
IMO the next 48 hours should tell all of us if we have any shot at this staying a Constitutional Republic.
Bogey, I unfortunately, agree with you. Unfortunately because I’m on tenderhooks!!!
Keep praying folks, keep praying!!!
Don’t depend on Ratcliffe to do the right thing.
After all, Rat is the first three letters of his last name.
Bogey–totally agree!
While I really like Richard Grenell as he was laying waste to the uniparty, but keep in mind that Ratcliffe was rejected by the uniparty as well the first time around. They only agreed to let him in to shutdown Ric’s efforts. So yes Ratcliffe is very likely Ric-light, but he is also no Praetorian Guard Barr either. In short, I’m not happy until the uniparty isn’t happy.
Seriously though, the President should use the ‘acting’ appointments loophole like a conga line cycling all those he can trust from one position to the next in the executive branch. That is if martial law doesn’t end the problem in the first place and give these Rats an out to retirement via Pardon that doesn’t involve prison.
Could this be what Trump will talk about on Sunday morning?
There are also a few legal issues still in play.
What you write might be possible.
Lincoln instituted a limited Martial Law, arresting the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, some Senators and Representative, owners and editors of newspapers, and hundreds of private citizens.
They were jailed and tried under the military.
I am not sure what PT might or might not do but when a foreign country has involved themselves in our federal election I would imagine that opens the legal door for Pres Trump to do a lot.
once again, we lost the rule of law when the republican party installed the kenyan terrorist into the whitehouse.the stoopid party whens again. mark levine should be proud.
Exactly, the court has demonstrated they have lost whatever weak tether they had to the Constitution. The pseudo-legal principle of standing is a court-constructed doctrine, basically designed to allow the court to sidestep any issue they do not want to address. The idea that they can shirk their duty in such a fundamental case of Americans being defrauded of their right to a fair and free election is truly mind-boggling.
The court should be firmly reprimanded for their traitorous actions to all Americans. If they had any honor at all, they would recognize their abject failure to uphold their oath of office and immediately resign.
What about a Constitutional Convention???
All we need is 36 states…
Not going to happen in the current post-constitutional world we live in. Besides the States don’t have standing over the CCP.
Seems Sundance would do everyone on the board A favor to let us no the Calvary is not coming next week and this is a done deal.
Sundance is not needed to form your own opinion.
Trump should openly encourage everyone in the Georgia runoff to vote multiple times, since if something is unenforceable its legal.
Kavanaugh has let himself become a cuck to a Deep State that tried and still will destroy him and his family at any turn.
Up until now, no Court has examined the merits of the lawsuits and the defendants have not denied the accusations that they cheated.
I think the Deep State is simply too entrenched and the only way to fix this is to just bypass them.
Out of the box thinking… short of a civil war ( where most lawyers end up either with Ruth or unemployed ) we need to make the Deep State irrelevant.
Time for secession. Take a bunch of state and all conservative counties and any blue/red state and create the United Counties of America.
We take the US constitution.
The Democrats can get stuck living in their United Cities of America. Good luck. And no visas for them to move into OUR country.
Oh, good luck for the Dems to bring in the NG and Military. I got a feeling the NG will support us and the military will be controlled by us. After all, almost 100% of the military is based in the United Counties of America. No one really needs the Pentagon, the CIA and State Dept. And no one needs the FBI HQ, Education Dept, etc, etc…
https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1337840031726063616
I wonder if; Barret, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch realize how much they have pissed-off at least a 100-million American Patriot voters? My guess they may be academically smart as all hell, but when it comes to common sense as to right or wrong they are as dumb and stupid as a pile of rocks.
The three hopefully pay dearly for the damage they have done to America’s freedom for exchange of Communist tyranny and slavery….the plight for us all.
May God Himself take His revenge on those 3 justices and all others who defy His covenant with George Washington and our founders as they founded and dedicated this land to Him.
How are they going to “pay dearly” for their cowardice? They are appointed for life, and there is nothing any of us can do about it.
For over 50 years I have followed national and local elections with interest. At the conclusion of each and every one the phrase “the people have spoken” is dragged out to let the losers know it was over and better luck next time. Now I’m faced with the realization that perhaps for the first time in my lifetime (except 1960) the people apparently have no say in the outcome of a national election and little chance for redress from the courts. If there is, as it now appears, little or no rule of law, where do a supposedly free people go for justice? The purveyors of hope porn seem to think Trump will invoke the insurrection act or something similar, and save the country from itself. If he does, he’d better have irrefutable proof even those that depend on MSM for their news will believe. We yearn for that miracle that will somehow save us from the coming tyranny. The miracle will in all likelihood, send the crazy left into a violent frenzy which will not be good for anyone. Nonetheless, a free people cannot let one of our fundamental rights, free and fair elections, simply be taken away without a fight. Are we at the point of having to check the final box? I hope not.
Link is the 2020 Election Litigation Tracker on the SCOTUS blog site. 21 cases are listed.
“My untutored mind is having difficulty figuring out just who, and under what circumstances, has a legal right to a fair election.
It seems the current answer is: no-one.”
Q: Wonder is SC will deem these cases moot for lack of standing? s/, NOT
https://www.scotusblog.com/election-litigation/
Only the CCP has standing.
We can perhaps recover from this, but only if Georgians hold their collective nose and help preserve the Republican Senate majority. If the Dems gain control of the Senate, they will capture SCOTUS by packing it (Levin pointed this out last night on Parler), then they will capture the Senate by adding 4 Democrat seats from DC and Puerto Rico and abolishing the filibuster, and finally, they will give the vote to tens of millions of illegals and pass universal mail-in balloting (so that they don’t have to cheat or can cheat at will). All this they will try to accomplish prior to the 2022 midterms. If they succeed we will fall under tyrannical Democrat (but I repeat myself) rule for a generation or more.
For a glimpse of that America-wide future right now, look no further than California and their one-party rule.
Are you kidding me?
1) the unpacked SCOTUS has just proved they are already “captured”
2) GOP wants amnesty for millions of illegals too. Electing them won’t stop that one flipping bit
3) they are literally cheating at will right now
4) the GOP is not on our side. They never have been. D and R are letters in the same alphabet. Both parties are doing this to us.
If Republicans wanted votes they should try to be like President Trump and represent the people. Until they learn that lesson I’m far to busy washing my hair that day.
Well the ‘Constitution’ doesn’t allow for adding States, or even material changes, without the approval of a super-majority of the other States, but there I go again bringing up the ‘Constitution’. Heck, every corrupt blue county can now become a state as well, welcome to 200 States of America, heck why not 500. I for one am flying the Betsy Ross flag if Trump is not President after January 20th 2021 as proud member of US Revolution 2.0.
As soon as everyone understands that the Constitution is null and void if “We the People’s” President is not in office come January 20th, the better.
What we all do about this possibility is another matter entirely, but that facts above remain.
Since Kavanaugh rolled over on this; how,uch support do tou think he will give to the military trbunals he talked about?
none…
Ever give a thought that the “military tribunals” are for Trump and supporters ?
Yes, and that is exactly what the CCP of America has in store.
If get to the point of military tribunals, Kavanaugh’s opinion will no longer matter. I guess you can say, he will no longer have standing.
Rudy Giuliani interviewed on the War Room – Body language – He looks and sound defeated.
He might be still just a little tired from the flu.
Or just tired. He’s no spring chicken and he also just dealt with coronavirus.
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
“The Supreme Court had ZERO interest in the merits of the greatest voter fraud ever perpetrated on the United States of America. All they were interested in is “standing”, which makes it very difficult for the President to present a case on the merits. 75,000,000 votes!”
Yes we know ,
Where are you getting your news from carrier pigeon s
I was actually pleased with the SCOTUS’ decision, and I fully expected it. It’s their wink wink nudge nudge to POTUS to impose martial law. There was no other way. Now he can do so without appearing “political”. And SCOTUS got off without appearing”political”. Just my (possibly insane) theory.
Wisconsin Supreme Court hearing concluded just now,
Justices meeting at 3:00 ET to figure out how to write a way around the law and throw the POTUS case out.
POTUS attorney deserves a Presidential Medal of Freedom,
Dang it! Too much doom and gloom here! Pull yourselves up by the britches and take a deep breadth. I know sad souls like commiserate with others in like moment… but it’s time to move on. Texas? Great effort that was a surprise in the first place. Heck they should refile again with more case law!
But it ain’t over by a long shot. There are 4-5 other cases pending appeal, and more on the way. If SCOTUS is just going to punt… we need to make them punt again and again…we need to keep speaking, loudly, firmly, consistently… If they keep rejecting cases, that will prove the mettle and measure of each these nine men and women, and force them to consider the Constitution as they never have before. And that will tell us where we stand more clearly than ever. Our voices are being heard more each day! We must stand firm… America is not lost. It ain’t over… it’s NEVER OVER.
That Flag above doesn’t just wave in fair weather… it waves every day, every year, every decade, in sun or storm and no matter what challenges we face- the American Flag will remain, as will the dedication and strength of the America itself. Keep the faith friends- stand together!
I have no faith in the courts
Yes, but I have faith in +100 million legal voting American’s. We are force to be reckoned with. Almost all armed to the gills and pissed off at present due to the CCP efforts to take over our nation. Plus we constitute at least 90% of those in uniform, both civilian and military, past and present.
Afterall you don’t expect Marxist cowards to put their life on the line for country they hate do you?
One can recognize that the courts and legal system are hopelessly corrupt without “giving up”. I don’t believe anybody who says that is giving up; they are simply recognizing that justice will have to be secured through other means.
Barrett, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Barr, Durham, Sessions, Wray, Comey, Yates, Horowitz, Mueller, etc etc.
Trump knows how Caesar felt on the Ides of March.
Is it true that no lawsuit so far this cycle has been heard in a court room?
This is what Democracy gets you. We need to move the power back to the states. Letting each state compete for it’s own best interest would mightily strengthen the nation. And we can better keep an eye on our local politicians.
The power has Always been within the states.!
That is why we are called the United States of America.
Different States united under the Constitution of this Republic.
Democracy is basically mob rule and giving those with the most power (and money)power.
The Constitution and laws within, keep the “Democracy” in control.
We are a Constitutional Republic.
An open letter to the Supreme Court and the states Attorney Generals,
I know, as you do too that this election was stolen by voter fraud. I have been watching the fraud grow for the past 20 years with no one to do anything about it. Math reveals the fraud.
Stealing this election is nothing short of sedition. It is an attempt to take over the halls of power in this country against the will of the people. Our form of government rests on the consent of the governed. Once government is divorced from consent, it is tyranny and will continue to grow more oppressive until it is stopped. We will not have a second shot at this. The presidential vote of 2020 was a vote to determine if would ever have free elections again. If you do not stop this sedition, the tyranny of government will prevail.
The question before us is, how can a simple piece of paper remain the supreme law of the land? Our Constitution enlists every elected official to step up to guard and protect the constitution in at least three ways relevant to this situation
First, Governments are constituted to secure our unalienable rights. Vote fraud certainly takes these rights from us as citizens. “Governments are instituted to secure these rights” is positive statement of government’s duty. This statement is not a prohibition on government. It is an assignment of duty.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. –That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. [Emphasis added] – United States Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776
Second, by the oath of office. Every federal and state official in all three branches of government, including the military, are required to take an oath to defend the constitution against the kind of treason perpetrated this election. Every right comes with a corresponding duty. In this country, this principle is embedded into the constitution through the oath of office. As the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, so the right and the duty to govern is supremely a right to implement, and a duty to be bound by the Constitution. The oath of office places a personal demand on every ruler to by bound by the Constitution and to be enlisted in its army of protection against rogue unconstitutional actors. Without knowledgeable leaders willing to exercise the courage necessary to perform this protective duty, lawlessness will prevail. Notice that “all” officials in “all” branches of both the federal and state levels are required to take this oath. Thus, this provision of the constitution certainly gives states standing against other states where the integrity of the constitution is concerned.
To what expedient then shall we finally resort, for maintaining in practice the necessary partition of power among the several departments, as laid down in the constitution? The only answer that can be given is, that as all these exterior provisions are found to be inadequate, the defect must be supplied, by so contriving the interior structure of the government, as that its several constituent parts may, by their mutual relations, be the means of keeping each other in their proper places. – James Madison, Federalist 51
The interest of the man must be connected with the constitutional rights of the place. It may be a reflection on human nature, that such devices should be necessary to control the abuses of government. But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? – James Madison, Federalist 51
Third, by a guarantee of a republican form of government. Article 4 section 4 is a direct duty on the federal government to guarantee to every state a Republican form of government. This is because a republican form of government for one state depends on the actions of every state. Vote fraud in any state steals a republican form of government from every state. This clause is not a prohibition on government but, rather, mandates direct federal action.
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government. – Article 4, Section 4, United States Constitution
We may define a republic to be, or at least may bestow that name on, a government which derives all its powers directly or indirectly from the great body of the people; and is administered by persons holding their offices during pleasure, for a limited period, or during good behaviour. It is essential to such a government, that it be derived from the great body of the society, not from an inconsiderable proportion, or a favoured class of it. … It is sufficient for such a government, that the persons administering it be appointed, either directly or indirectly, by the people; and that they hold their appointments by either of the tenures just specified. – James Madison, Federalist 39
A stolen election creates a form of government derived from the few who commit the fraud rather than from the great body of the people. This condition mandates direct federal action to preserve the very functioning of government. Article 4 section 4 is one of the few provisions in the constitution that expands rather than limits the role of the government. There are no limits placed on how to guarantee a republican form of government because without a republican form, all other provisions are mute.
Stability in government is essential to national character, and to the advantages annexed to it, as well as to that repose and confidence in the minds of the people, which are among the chief blessings of civil society. – James Madison, Federalist 37
Thank you, please take action. There are millions of us counting on your integrity to the constitution, even to pledge our own lives and fortunes and sacred honor.
Ammo box…it’s the only box left.
And the ammo box may not be available soon. They won’t need to come for the guns if there’s no ammo available or if you have to prove you’ve met wome social credit threshold to buy it.
Sorry, not true. We need to fight at ‘all’ times for ‘all’ boxes.
The soap box, is happening right now and I’m currently using it. In CCP controlled China, what I’m typing right now isn’t even possible, at least not for long, and then promptly memory holed.
The ballot box is what we are focused on right now, and rightly so. We need to fight for that in whatever county or State we can. We fight this battle county by county and then State by State. The vote must be true everywhere or “We the People” and thus the contract that is the Constitution is dead. Fortunately even with the wide scale voter fraud nationwide we hold 90% of the US land area, if this was a war, which it is, we would have already won. We just need to find a way to press through the corrupt courts of the blue counties.
The jury box is equally important. Let’s say you are on the Jury concerning a Citizen who was found ‘not’ to have register and paid +million dollar tax on his firearms as per the ‘unconstitutional’ State of Federal law passed by the CCP marxists? It’s your job to find him/her innocent and thus lock up the jury to the best of your ability. So please to all Patriots answer your jury summons, you never know if you might be able to help save a fellow patriot from jail who was simply trying to protect his God given rights of self defense.
Now last but not least ‘is’ the ammo box, the least desired one of all, but nonetheless, one that at times is needed in times of great stress and has often resulted in renewal on Earth for those that manage to survive its deadly toll. I fear this box the most, because as it is said, before you seek revenge, first dig two graves. And yet what greater sacrifice than to lose one’s life for his country in defense of his God.
This is exactly what happened in 2007/2008 when multiple lawsuits were filed challenging states and Obama on the Natural Born Citizen issue. The courts passEd the buck for lack of standing. Or technicalities. Apparently no individual has the right to challenge the states to meet that Constitutional requirement and no state is required to prove that any candidate meets that requirement. The parties are not required to provide proof either.
The judicial system in this country is broken beyond repair.
The State legislators NEED TO SUE in the supreme court.
this is what ALITO is saying
Find the state legislators and get this information to them! FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FOR TRUMP Now.
and to people talking about crowd sizes in dc. FCK DC. we fight from our homes, defend our homes, and if the President says march on DC we will cover that like an eclipse.
https://twitter.com/4thAmendmentRe2/status/1337848875919552519?s=20
There are five GOP majority legislatures. They need to pass resolutions, declare the laws violated, and appoint Trump electors.
But these legislatures comprise a lot of little people. Also transparency laws such that those who are of a more leadership bent still have a difficult time meeting with others and strategizing. It’s difficult when everything has to be done publicly.
It’s time for phone calls and emails and demonstrations to the individuals in these legislatures who need to get their brave on.
Yeah, these little people are being torn asunder right now with the GOP leadership on one side versus the thousands of votes they will throw away from loyal Trump voters…with the nation’s fate hanging in the balance, these little people need to stiffen their spines a little higher
Within a few days, after all legal avenues have been exhausted prepare for PDJT to invoke the insurrection Act. He has sworn an oath to protect America from enemies foreign & domestic, he will do so. Underneath the fraud Americans overwhelmingly voted for him, he has our support, he shall proceed with that knowledge. The other branches of government at every level are weak and corrupt, only the president can preserve the union and defend us, the only tool left is the Insurrection Act. The evidence for invoking it is astonishing & irrefutable, China is seeking to overthrow our government, eliminate Americans, seize US land & assets.
This is war. Pres Trump must respond to China’s act of war without declaring war, he must position China into their next move. The Insurrection Act, arresting & detaining traitors, revealing to the only court that matters, the American people the evidence is the proper response. Americans will become even more incensed than they are now when these traitors are named and the cash flow is exposed. He must prevent through the Insurrection Act the meeting of the electors, announce that the election was so fraught with fraud it must be redone with paper ballots, setting a new election day.
These moves, or similar moves will force China to escalate. They have detonated a bio weapon, paid millions to undermine our cherished election day & install their candidate, they have more moves left. That will allow Trump to respond accordingly.
Pres Trump either rolls over or he fights it out. EO 13484 was either a bluff or bullet in the chamber.
Agree! President Trump is not a quitter.
He is a fighter. So we should all remember that and support him.
We are not quitters either !
Keep calling and writing your representatives every day!
DC is lost. Has been for a long time now. We need to focus locally as much as we can. I’m not saying don’t fight but we have been shouting into the wind now for a very long time. Locally we may have chances at resistance to the tyranny from both the States and the Fed.
Just seize the damn machines already
Why not just show up in GA with semi trucks full of ballots for the runoff election ? It’s really nobody’s business.
The only case(s) that the SC will hear regarding Trump is where one or all of the individual state courts that Trump is now suing in rule in his favor. They’ll immediately take those and overturn them 7-2. It’s how those Seven Sinister Sisters roll in this Banana Republic. “The legal path [is] in the state courts and you have to hope that the justices in the state court are going to show somewhat more determination, somewhat more willingness, to be willing to take some degree of criticism and somewhat more willingness to have an open mind,” Giuliani said.
Guys, Trump’s got this. He planned it years in advance, hellfire is going to rain down.
Keep the faith, it’s going to be glorious.
LOL ?
Have you read his tweets ? He’s devastated that Barr let him and the country down.
I just watched the hearings at the Wisconsin Supreme Court and was absolutely horrified to see the rabid partisan nature of a couple of the Justices. I could close my eyes and envision Nancy Pelosi speaking. Then, I read that these chooches are elected. That explained alot.
Yes it was horrifying and clear sign that this won’t be decided by the courts.
Can the states just withhold their electoral votes on Jan. 4?
I think the legislature can vote for Trump.
Standing? On what?
Who in their right mind would try and steal an election from
this guy and his team mates? Really?
Who thinks these warriors came home to idly watch the steal?
Not I.
https://taskandpurpose.com/news/alaxey-germanovich-air-force-cross/
Me neither Ma! Thanks for the link, the heroics of our warriors should inspire all of us to never give up, never submit to tyranny and FIGHT! They won’t go quietly into that good night and neither will millions of us patriots. We will stand!
Have we discussed Col. West’s suggestion about secession?
My issue with succession is living in NH. We flipped our state back to the RED it always was, and that I have been telling people it was for years now. However we are stuck smack dab in the middle of a sea of Blue! Don’t forget about us. We have been an outpost of “Live Free Or Die” freedom forever! KAG!
edit: I’m pretty sure our 4 NH DemoCommie members of the U.S. CONgress were elected thanks to Dominion et al.
I’m in NC and we would be left behind because of totally corrupt Dems and RINO Republicans. The state voted red but somehow one of the most despised governors in the union win re-election..I don’t think so…this tyrant must go and I checked there is no way to recall a governor in NC>
There are no blue states, only blue cities.
A very important point Dzufast.
I also believe that we have been suffering voter fraud for a long time and these so called “blue” states are not as blue as they claim to be.
We might be splitting off states and land that are really full of patriots but have been stolen by fraudulent elections years ago.
Even the so called blue cities might not be as blue as they seem.
Sorry we tried that once before, not going to work. Besides 90% of the nation based on land area is behind the Constitution, in addition to the Majority of the People, all +100 million of us.
The key we need to focus on is the election system (ie the ballot box). It is both the uniparties greatest weakness and yet the very source of their ‘claimed’ legitimacy as described in the Declaration of Independence. The have no legitimate powers unless “We the People” agree.
True spaul.
When our country was split in 1860 very few of the southern population even owned slaves.
But they were forced to go along with the secession and to fight against their will because of the more politically powerful and wealthy plantation owners.
The whole thing was just a mess with the non-slave owners being forced into the secession and the North being forced into the secession because a very tiny portion of America owned and wanted to keep their slaves.
90% or less of Americans did not own slaves at the time but were forced into a civil war because less than 10% of the population wanted to keep their way of life.
Secession is not the way to go.
As you point out our “elected officials” have no power at all except that which we the voters give them.
And this includes the nine people who sit high and mighty on the US Supreme Court.