In a disappointing majority decision announced shortly before 6:30pm Friday evening, a majority of Supreme Court justices refused to take up a Texas lawsuit challenging four states in the 2020 election.
The court, with two dissenting options by Justice Alito and Justice Thomas, stated that Texas lacked a legal right to sue and did not have a legal interest in how other states carried out their elections.
The court rejected the Texas’ lawsuit without considering the specific merits of the state’s case.
Texas had asked the court to delay the official vote of the Electoral College, scheduled for Monday, Dec. 14, or prevent the four states from casting votes in the Electoral College for Biden. Justice Alito filed a short statement regarding the court’s disposition of the case and was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas.
The position of the Supreme Court raises an important question that now sits unresolved. If an individual citizen is determined not to have standing to challenge an election result; and if a group of citizens represented by their interest in a state, any state, is also denied standing to challenge an election result; then who can constitutionally challenge an election, any election, that is mired in controversy and demonstrable evidence of fraud?
From the Alliance:
- An individual voter does not have standing to sue for election misconduct. (He/she is only one person and everyone cannot sue all the time for all elections.)
- An official who may be adversely affected, cannot sue before an election in anticipation of bad conduct because it is speculative (not ripe)
- An official who was adversely affected, cannot sue after an election claiming bad conduct because it is too late (latches)
- A state does not have standing to sue on behalf of its citizens to remedy other states’ bad election conduct (no standing)
The result appears to be that no lawsuit involving the recent election cycle has been heard on the merits. Insofar as I am aware, the substance of misconduct claims have not been heard in court. (In fairness, there has been no decision on whether a state can sue itself for election misconduct.)
The U.S.S.C has created a constitutional right to abortion from emanations and penumbras. It has told us there is latitude to provide jobs and college admissions based on race or sex. The high court has created a constitutional right to burn the flag.
The Supreme Court, and other courts, have determined limits on constitutional rights to: free speech, bearing arms, freedom of assembly, religious worship, who can use which bathroom, whether the state can hang a murderer; whether men can compete in women’s sports; whether you can operate a restaurant, how hot your coffee can be, etc. ad nauseum.
However, when it comes to the citizen’s right to make sure his or her vote counts and is not nullified by corrupt and dishonest practices, the courts have decided that it is imperative they restrain themselves from taking a position on the merits.
They have thoughtfully informed us of constraints on them that no-one knew existed. The Friday ruling cites only a conclusion, but no reasoning.
If a state sues, is it not representing its citizens? Isn’t that, at the root, the only function of a state government? Are the citizens’ rights to an honest vote not affected if another state runs a bogus election and the first state’s votes become nullified?
Does a state not have standing to sue because the court anticipates it will not succeed on the merits? Why do courts ever bother to write legal opinions when they can save time and tell us the outcome they have in mind right away?
My untutored mind is having difficulty figuring out just who, and under what circumstances, has a legal right to a fair election.
It seems the current answer is: no-one.
Would the support of Bill Barr have given standing to this lawsuit?
Sorry bout the dupe?
again
The best summation of what the so-called doctrine of standing is. It should really be called the Pontius Pilate doctrine.
https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1337840031726063616
It means “You don’t really have a dog in this fight so what’s it to you”? Or “You weren’t hurt so big deal.”
Of course, a Texan has a lot of dogs in a fight for the fair election of a Potus as does each citizen of the other 49 states.
What is really means is, “Damn, I don’t know how we’ll ever figure this one out so as to escape the wrath of those we fear and those we respect….so, we’ll go with those we fear.”
Barnes is wrong, and I’m tired of his self-promotion.
Sorry bub, but I’ll tske his counsel over yours any day of the week.
The examination of the Michigan machines is not being released either. Discouraging. Here is a speculative report.
https://voxday.blogspot.com/2020/12/how-dominion-disguised-fraud.html
I think that Dominion got a gag order to prevent the truth from getting out
When you have to gag someone, there IS no transparency, right?
And when you have to gag someone, someone is guilty!!
I can’t be certain because it’s been such a long time since I began believing in the U.S. two tiered justice system, but I’m thinking there was once a time when true blue, honorable, personally and professionally ethical people were in our justice system.
If the behavior of the Dominion peeps and their shady connections (china, s0r0s… ), the sworn statements, surveillance video, and the mathematically impossible counts didn’t make NORMAL LE types curious about the possibility of fraud what would?
The people will not accept this. It’s so in your face and over the top it can not be swept under the rug. There will be consequences.
I think we have always had a somewhat two tiered justice system.
There were times and places in our country when we had more honorable, ethical people in the system but honestly we have always been at the mercy of who was “in charge”.
I have a lot of respect for our fore Fathers and Mothers but they were only human and set up the best system possible and it was so much better than what they left behind.
I am not naive and know that as soon as it was set up some one started bending it their way.
Things would get out of hand and then were brought back in alignment.
Now it is our turn to be adults and get things back into running order, for the future of our kids and grandkids we need to get it done.
As you say Jederman we sill not accept this fraudulent election, we will not allow it to be swept under the rung.
There will be consequences.
What ever it takes.
We are becoming more and more like a Monarchy in so many ways now.
History has a way of repeating itself.
Next legitimate case before the supreme court….whether Transmen have a right to use women’s bathrooms….Do the men have standing? Why yes….Yes they do.
Well, they are standing anyway.
https://twitter.com/ali/status/1337810996220538883
“The US Constitution is an agreement between states.
If several states believe some of the other states are not abiding by that agreement, but somehow “don’t have standing” to do anything about it … then what does it mean to have an agreement at all?”
Quite.
SCOTUS can run but it can’t hide.
Why should SCOTUS run?
No one is chasing them.
They make a purely arbitrary decision with no supporting explanation whatsoever, and go home. 100+ million people are disenfranchised, but the SCOTUS elites are silent.
This is not right; it’s a travesty. That arbitrary statement should not be allowed to stand without clear justification. SCOTUS must be pressured to explain the legal support for their decision. If they refuse, Impeach all 7 of the justices who voted to not even hear the evidence, I don’t care if three of them are President Trumps allegedly constitutionally conservative appointees.
You don’t understand. SCOTUS didn’t even look at the evidence or the arguments. It didn’t reject the evidence , it effectively refused to hear the case. That’s what “no standing” means
SCOTUS does not want to get involved in this. It ran away.
Possibly. Or the conservative justices could know there are other cases better suited to their aim that are coming.
They appear to be people who read and watch the drivel
that is passed off as “news” and that
is a sad reflection on how far afield our country has strayed.
Our founding fathers would have already gone to powder………
Prayer….. That is where we are, and our VSGPDJT.
We need to be more like our founding fathers, we can powder and pray at the same time!
Very nicely put.
Now you know why the snobbish elites look down their noses at us with their haughty contempt, viewing real, hard-working Americans as deplorable fools for actually believing all that history rubbish about rights and equality. They expect us to know our place, just as they’ve trained their former slaves to know their place (though of late, some have been getting funny ideas about real rights and not penury hand-outs).
And as for the media acting all huffy when they get mocked at public gatherings … you clowns have brought it on yourselves for abandoning journalism and replacing it with propaganda and advocacy.
Now let’s see how the cases piling up at SCOTUS get handled; there are at least five that I know of with more on the way.
SERF, all of us.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3914800/posts
Only because it appears relevant.
Swamp rats are gonna swamp rat. We’ve allowed this Imperial Federal Government to set up fiefdoms allowing the “right” people to amass wealth by dealing away pieces of the USA. From the Warren court forward we’ve been dealing with legislation from the bench, ever since.
They love to prattle on about not wanting to interfere with an election but as is true with all leftist/globalist it’s pure projection. When it behooves the bottom line of the swamp they don’t hesitate to make legislation from the bench. The list is legion.
My favorite example is Prop 187 in CA 1994 . The people of CA voted for 63%, against 37%. Well this did not line up with the leftist and they went judge shopping. And a single judge simply set aside of the overwhelming majority of Californians and Prop 187 was set aside. Pete Wilson was worn out being called a racist daily, and literally lost his voice. Of course Bill Clinton’s DOJ and Janet Reno stood around snickering with other globalist swine. The lesson was learned, and here we are.
“The ends justify the means.”
“If” this is to be fixed it will be our Great American President Donald J Trump and his Deplorable Army. He either uses his executive power or he/we will lose it. There are other cases moving through the judicial as we speak, good, but this is going to require us and the our VSGDJT. Time to use the bully pulpit and expose it all and if President Trump calls we will come. It’s in his court.
God Bless America!
Sick to my stomach as to what is happening to our great nation.
For all of those who, like me, believe the report that the SCYTL servers reveal that Trump won 410 to 128, that the sitting President won in a historic landslide, well, FRICK THE SUPREME COURT.
We don’t need ’em.
Since Trump won, and won big, he has every legal right — and a constitutional duty — use the Lincoln solution.
Once upon a time the Roger Taney court ruled 7-2 that that black people “are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word ‘citizens’ in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States.”
That was March 6, 1857.
Taney’s decision did NOT stand.
Nor will the Roberts’ decision stand.
The Lincoln precedent is the key to ensuring an AMERICAN FUTURE WITHOUT COMMUNISM.
WRAP YOUR MIND AROUND THAT!
Start here: Patriots should use all means to prevent a surrender to communism.
Accepting the false assertion that Biden/Harris won is to surrender.
We won.
We should not and cannot surrender.
Ask yourself: Why would my President surrender just because the communist media, communist big tech, communist judiciary, communist congressmen — this communist echo chamber of elitists — say we should surrender?
We are in the right.
We are in the majority.
Some analysis of the Dominion/Smartmatic/etc. fraud estimates that President Trump may have won 100 million votes.
Biden/Harris won considerably less.
Just because the elitist institutions claim you need to put your head into a woodchipper, are you gonna do it?
Come on! Let’s use a little common sense here!
What would the Founders tell us to do faced with absolute corruption? They faced it. They faced down the largest standing army in the world. And they won.
What would Lincoln tell us to do faced with absolute intransigence? He faced it. He faced down a far better army fighting on its own home ground led by far better generals. And he won.
President Trump needs to look deep into his heart but also into the history of America.
President Trump needs to go the full Lincoln.
President Trump has the Insurrection Act. And that is all he needs.
President Trump’s attorneys need to keep the legal pressure up.
President Trump needs to start twisting arms (meaning leveraging the option of one-way trips to Gitmo) with McConnell, Barr, and other RINO fencesitters.
Or he needs to make them disappear — because Congress needs to begin a long-term investigation of the stealing of America by the communists.
President Trump’s next step is to transition from voter fraud story to the story of who is behind the steal.
That is where the story is revealed to be an undeclared war by red China against America.
President Trump has been putting America on a war footing, and the next step is to cancel the covid emergency and replace it with a national emergency of technical war against China, acknowledging that China has launched a sneak attack against America.
The attack is (1) cyberwar, (2) biowarfare, (3) espionage, infiltration, and turning of key Americans who have national security clearances, using bribery and other classical tools, (4) industrial espionage, (5) psychological warfare, and (6) sabotage. There may have also be miltary incidents of which we are unaware.
In a state of emergency — an emergency that threatens both national security and sovereignty — by, in part, subverting our national election — the President has expansive constitutional powers. Like Lincoln, to preserve the republic and the Constitutional, sometime you have to go extra-constitutional.
His tools are loyal military and loyal federal law enforcement.
He also will need to federalize the national guard, and deputize certain state police, local police, and sheriffs. U.S. Attorneys also have a key role.
The immediate goal is a national dragnet to capture all Chinese communist operative and their American partners.
This means rounding up most if not all Democrat Congressmen and Senators.
Yes, I know it SOUNDS radical, but actually it isn’t. You have to seize everyone is a communist, or drive them out of the country, like Pinochet did.
You start with the communist leaders. Removing Pelosi and Newsom and Whitmer and Schumer and de Blasio and the rest from the national political landscape will create a kerfuffle.
But then you go after those creating the kerfuffle. Pretty soon you have removed all of the obvious communists.
You go after the communist terrorist cells — Antifa, BLM, Occupy, etc. — on a parallel track.
You remove all of the political impediments to restoring liberty in America, including the communists on the Supreme Court.
Remember: Since 1954 it has been AGAINST FEDERAL LAW to be a communist in America. That Trumps the Supreme Court.
Liberty is the Constitutional obligation that the Founders bequeathed us. Not following the dictates of the Taney court or the Roberts court.
President Trump will use the 14th Amendment, the McCarran Security Act of 1950, and the Communist Control Act of 1954 to restore liberty.
The last one has not been tested, but hey, let someone bring it to Mr. Roberts.
Again, the Lincoln precedent is our guide: Save the Republic at all costs. Restore liberty.
Therefore, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES can or should President Trump vacate the office that he LEGALLY and IN FACT won by a landslide.
Defeat the undeclared communist insurrection with lightning speed.
(1) Remove the communists from America.
(2) Defeat the Chinese undeclared war.
(3) Restore liberty throughout the land.
This, President Trump, is what we want YOU to do.
No matter what the FRICKING SUPREME COURT says.
Not just a few Republican Senators too, but all you said and more should be done.
Save the Republic at all costs.
Absolutely! I know many ELO and veterans who are just livid. Men of all ages, and many now in their late sixties and seventies. Old men who fought against the communists in SE Asia and elsewhere, and are willing to fight one more time for their grandchildren. They feel they lived a good life and it is their duty to leave to future generations what was handed to them.
Could the corrupt state and federal governments convince their law enforcement agencies and military to make war against their own bothers, fathers, and grandfathers to support a corrupt and illegitimate political establishment who gained power through graft, election fraud, and other nefarious activities? Honest men who are defending themselves from a criminal cabal illegally installed? I think not. No one like cheaters and criminals except other cheaters and criminals. The ELO damn sure don’t like cheaters and criminals, and the corrupt ruling class didn’t endear themselves to them with support of BLM, Antifa, and defunding.
Everything needs to come out! I never thought I would see the day of Soviet style mockingbird press narratives in the USA The whole corrupt media propaganda façade need to be torn down for all to see the truth. They are the enemies of the people and co-conspirators with the cabal. Their first amendment rights end when they engage in sedition.
Again, all the people who engaged in this coup are criminals, and all criminals should be arrested. There really shouldn’t be any controversy among sane Americans who understand that if you break the law you’ll get arrested. If you commit obstruction of justice you’ll get arrested. If you engage in treason or sedition, you’ll get arrested. There’s no free pass because this was an election or has to do with politics.
Action must be taken by the people, as auxiliaries to ELO if possible, or by themselves if necessary. It doesn’t have to be bloody if it is done with purpose. The corrupt ruling class cabal is small compared to the the tens of millions of patriots. One need only cut off its head. We could fix this country in a few months by just arresting probably less than a few thousand.
I just don’t see any other way to avoid serfdom.
Communists have coveted this country for decades.
We can never give up freedom or this Republic.
Their brutality is physical, emotional and spiritual.
We cannot let them break us. Give it back twice as hard.
As long as there is an ember of freedom in our sour – they lose.
And they know it.
They want complete defeat and destruction of us and our beloved country.
we will never give up.
They detest that we continue to fight.
They fear it.
Why do you think they talk about re-education camps and lists?
They mean to break us hard – especially psychologically & spiritually.
We will never despair. Never.
They fear freedom will always live in our hearts.
They know freedom is the DNA of every American & Deplorable.
Carry on.
IMHO peasant opinion, a Court should have to tell us who does have standing to bring a case before them if they tell a plaintiff that they lack that status. Otherwise this becomes the legal version of throwing darts at dartboard while wearing a blindfold.
If this election fraud stands, can you imagine what my state of PA will do in forthcoming elections? Writing your vote on a paper napkin? Legal! Declaring all Repuplican counties covid hotspots the day before the election and shutting down in person voting? Legal!
Never, ever again put a Federalist Society judge on the bench.
This is compelling unless I’m missing something.
How long are ballots to be kept post election?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgeqGmvQXKs
Another sad example of lawlessness taking over our country. As I’ve said before, it is impossible to co-exist with the dem/leftist. Now lying and cheating with elections is perfectly ok so only some gopers will be allowed to be elected since they will go along with dems. Plus it gives the illusion of two parties. They feel this will pacify we the people. Question–how long will we take this?? I have to agree with Allen West–
But, but, but the black-robed arbiters said, “No, we don’t want to ever hear that.”
From the rally…
https://m.tiktok.com/v/6895919946774220037.html?_d=secCgsIARCbDRgBIAIoARI%2BCjz%2BDEIGtTWufqaJ9xLAhJFiK4u5uMyX24kM6IIfzkBzRbmNsvmm1GzHywPcF6K2S0E%2BhFlOlaSklSBdRtsaAA%3D%3D&language=en&preview_pb=0&share_app_name=musically&share_item_id=6895919946774220037×tamp=1607801080&u_code=d86bccdh8ca89g&user_id=6733984851199149061&utm_campaign=client_share&utm_medium=android&utm_source=messenger
Do WOMEN have standing? Allegedly WOMEN were given the right to vote 100 years ago. It was called the 19th amendment.
“The year 2020 marks the 100th anniversary of the passage of the 19th Amendment, guaranteeing and protecting women’s constitutional right to vote.”
https://www.2020centennial.org
Maybe some smart attorneys out there will find a way to allow women to get standing, because it is clear their voices have been silenced, their votes stolen, in this Centennial year.
Only the CCP has standing.
I believe our President has standing – as the “injured candidate” in this election.
Can’t file a lawsuit before an election (not ripe), nor after election fraud (no standing).
So logically, election fraud is now legal. So now we can blatantly do massive election fraud. The side with more printers and election officials on the payroll wins.
Unelected bureaucrats can change election rules continuously right up to election day.
Thanks for nothing, Supreme Court. How much do we pay you @hoes for not having a spine?
It’s not “legal”… it’s “not illegal”.
https://twitter.com/PatrickByrne/status/1337820752217862144/photo/1
Just spent two hours in a GOP meeting with Georgia senate majority leader and a Perdue representative. Still seething but here is some of what I recall.
Did sec of state follow the law when he made changes to election law in regards to absentee voting, drop boxes, signature verification? No and we don’t know yet if he notified the Senate as he is required to for any consent agreements. Have you filed a lawsuit against him? No it would be against the law for us to do that.
Did fraud occur? Yes. Did you file any lawsuits because of fraud ? No we can’t prove it and it would be against the law for us to do so.
Can you do anything about the stolen election on Nov 3 or do anything about making runoff fair. No and no but we will be watching carefully and we know what problems there are and by golly we will make changes to law when we get back in session (after runoff)
Why didn’t you hold hearings sooner? Trump’s fault. They got the count done, he asked for an audit so witnesses were busy. Trump tied up witnesses again with third count so it’s all his fault.
Why didn’t you step in as soon as you found out Sec of state was changing rules before nov 3? Eventually it came down to Trump’s fault. He was against mail in voting but then he pushed it. Couldn’t go against him. Also primaries and general are part of same election so they couldn’t change rules in middle. Run off is new election according to federal law so they can register new voters. Did you file a lawsuit to stop that and follow state law which says they are same election? No it would be against the law for us to do that.
Why don’t you declare yourself in session, make changes to mail in voting and drop boxes, stand up for the laws you passed show evidence of fraud subpoena machines and envelopes for a signature audit.and let the courts figure it out – try to keep Biden electors tied up. It would be against the law for us to do that. By golly we know where the problems are and will fix them when we get back in session (after the runoff) . Then we can take back the house!!
In other words anything to try and fix nov 3 is against the law.
It sounds like they can’t fix themselves out of a wet paper bag, even if they wanted to
In short, its illegal to follow the law. Paging George Orwell.
Half-serious suggestion: Next time you go to one of those meetings, bring a 12ga coach gun and lay it in front of you. When an A whole starts one of his spiels, just reach out and caress the gun while giving him a baleful look!
Thanks for standing up and your effort to breakdown what happened there Georgia Girl! God bless you patriot!
If a force doesn’t trust their plan then they are disorganised, divided and easily defeated. If that’s the case then a new plan needs to be devised (and trusted) in which event some may speculate that the whole scenario (including the
development of the new plan) was the original plan in the first place.
Remember, sometimes you cannot tell people the truth, you must show them. Only at the precipice will people find the will to change.
Follow the lead of President Trump. Watch for signals from his key advocates – e.g. Flynn, Giuliani & Grenell. Hold the line! Fight, fight fight. That’s my
understanding of the plan, and I trust it.
Standing by??
Follow the lead of President Trump? He’s asking why Barr didn’t do his job.
He’s passing the buck.
The rebel alliance needs a competent general.
go away.
He’s CALLING ATTENTION to it so that when the time comes for Barr to be rounded up, the people will know why.
Cleanup on Aisle RolCon needed here.
Cold angered person waiting for seeing the opening in this situation, the opening always appears, the hardest part is the patient watching.
Yes it is Bessie.
like a child that wants satisfaction “right now” too many do not have the discipline to wait and see a plan though.
Time to secede by counties, not states and create a new nation. Too many Red counties in Blue states.They need t0 be counted too.
With all of the unconstitutional judgments from the SC we should have no problems with secession after all the Constitution is no longer is the rule of law for our nation.
Yes and then cut off power, food and water to the largely parasitic Marxist Blue counties. It won’t take long, maybe a couple weeks. Besides the Blue counties aren’t as blue as they appear to be, you have plenty of patriots behind enemy lines in the Blue counties.
We need to stop thinking of this potentially coming civil war in terms of Blue vs Red States but Blue vs Red counties. It becomes much clearer in terms of the battle lines when you look at a map. Adding to our advantage is that the Blue counties are in the process of self-inflicted social and economic destruction.
The last revolution was between Slave vs Free States. This time it’s between CCP funded Marxist Parasites vs God loving Patriotic Americans counties.
The Red Counties should help the Blue Metros and keep everything those WOKE Snowflakes call EVIL:like fossel fuels,the military,law enforcement, agriculture, livestock, all productions for everything the call EVIL like auto manufactoring.
They can keep all of their Fake educational systems that teach fake history, math and science. We will educate our own people.
Pontius Pilate washing his hands is the mental image I had upon reading about the Supremes refusing to hear the merits of the case. So disappointed in our Trump appointees. Cowards all.
That’s a really apt image….
Anybody hear of 305th military intel guys monitoring foreign election hanky panky? There has been sworn testimony given: http://www.naturalnews.com/files/Spider-Declaration-305.pdf. Good run down at Jeffrey Prather dot com.
Insurrection Act: https://policy.defense.gov/portals/11/documents/hdasa/references/insurrection_act.pdf
10 U.S.C. §§ 331-335 Sec. 331. Federal aid for State governments
Whenever there is an insurrections in any State against its government, the President may, upon the request of its legislature or of its governor if the legislature cannot be convened, call into Federal service such of the militia of the other States, in the number requested by that State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to suppress the insurrection.
Sec. 332. Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority
Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.
Sec. 333. Interference with State and Federal law
The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it–
(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or
(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws. In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.
Sec. 334. Proclamation to disperse
Whenever the President considers it necessary to use the militia or the armed forces under this chapter, he shall, by proclamation, immediately order the insurgents or those obstructing the enforcement of the laws to disperse and retire peaceably to their abodes within a limited time.
Sec. 335. Guam and Virgin Islands included as “State”
For purposes of this chapter, the term “State” includes Guam and the Virgin Islands
Due to the systematic abuses and violations of our Natural Rights, as defined in the Constitution, and the unlawful desecration of this governing document and its’ intent, thereof, by enemies of this Republic, both foreign and domestic, We herby revoke our consent to recognize as legitimate or to be governed by the government set to be empowered January 20th, 2021.
Due to the systematic abuses and violations of our Natural Rights, as defined in the Constitution, and the unlawful desecration of this governing document and its’ intent, thereof, by enemies of this Republic, both foreign and domestic, We herby revoke our consent to recognize as legitimate or to be governed by the government set to be empowered January 20th, 2021.
Wrap your heads around this piece … a report is due from DNI on December 18 regarding election misbehavior … and it is HUGE … read the following, including the video … WOW !!!
https://themarshallreport.wordpress.com/2020/11/28/trumps-executive-order-on-foreign-election-interference-has-serious-penalties/
It would appear that no branch of state or federal governments answers to the people. It cannot be argued that the people can express their will and thus hold government accountable through the exercising of the vote if the vote can be stolen and remain unchallenged after the fact.
I simply do not want to believe it, but I have reached the conclusion that the Supreme Court has been compromised.
I have concluded that John Roberts has demeaned and politicized the court to the point that I have lost all confidence in them or belief that they are really the supreme court.
The leftist judges always vote as a block, Roberts now exposes himself as globalist, the three new justices are wishy washy globalists, Alito is weakening and I do not trust him, and only Clarence Thomas remains as the one true Justice with principles and the belief in the constitution. I have no respect for the rest and I do not see why we need to go along with any of their stupid and meaningless decisions.
I withdraw my consent.
John Roberts is seriously compromised by the uniparty somehow, take it the bank.
Littleflower, the Supreme Court was always something of an up and down mess.
During the middle of the 1800s it went from 8 judges to nine judges to ten judges and then back to nine judges.
Why, well just because.
They may know more “Legal Speak” than the average citizen but they are far from being smarter than we are and it is time we stopped letting them push us around and take our rights away from us and give rights to those that do not have them.
Our generation has given this pompous black clad nine a lot more respect and power than they deserve.
Maybe it would be helpful to those here who are in despair if we have some thread/topic on how we can be the resistance..Maybe seeing a plan or ideas here in writing would be helpful..actual things we can do, ideas etc.
Exactly. Whats the plan?
Not a pretend plan. Not a riddle “trust the plan” plan.
Not a plan the people are guessing about.
Not what it looks like or we hope people are going to do.
Not trumps, powells, or lins plan.
The people’s plan.
Lets have a thread on what is the people’s plan forward. My plan, your plan, our plan.
SIMPLE. Give up some of the games and circuses.
Since MONEY is what these perps primarily care about, avoid consumption or use of what they produce or import as much as possible and, where feasible, let them know specifically why you aren’t. 80 million voters and their minor children should attract attention doing that.
That applies to charities as well..Don;t support international or national charities most of them of leftist leaning.. Stick to your local city/town charities, animal shelters, food banks, veterans etc. I sadly stopped giving to The Salvation Army after the Charlottesville nonsense when they said they would no longer have thier annual ball at Mar-a-lago cuz well you know racist and all that..they had held it there for a long time but with all the fuss they decided to pull out.
Good idea LOL, do you have a site or a blog that we can access where we can see the plan that you suggest?
You could also list your suggestions here if you want.
Go ahead and share you ideas.
Yes, let’s listen to LOL who does not know the term “President Trump.”
?????
I’m suspecting that is perzactly what has been keeping Sundance ‘otherwise occupied’ for the last few days?
Doesn’t make any difference anymore, the election was a fraud, the candidate, Joe was a con, just enough dems would vote for him to allow the fraud. Now the news shows the curruption of the Bidens so Joe won’t make it to Jan 20, 2021, he’ll withdraw, Kamalla will be president, with Stacey Abrahms or Corey Booker as the new VP.
Nearly everyone of substance in the Federal Government is involved.
The coup is done, not a single shot fired. Tragically genius really.
One nation
UNDER GOD
Let’s not forget that most important part.
God gives the authority. God can be trusted.
We know…Rinos
“GOP Senator Sasse Reacts to SCOTUS Decision on ‘Nonsense’ Election Reversal Bid” ….. https://www.newsweek.com/gop-senator-sasse-reacts-scotus-decision-nonsense-election-reversal-bid-1554333
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eo_tW4WXEAAdxT7?format=jpg&name=large
But then the President must definitely have the right to sue AND a standing!
He’s the “injured candidate.”
Was wondering if the Proud Boys has a seniors division, asking for a friend?
PB came out in force today in DC. Very well organized and impressive. .
Some of the posters here have made fun of the “keyboard warriors” but the older people have their place in their furious keyboard fighting OldSkool.
Not everyone is young and strong but we can all contribute in our own way.
Perhaps the PBs have a codger contingent that includes the keyboard kind who pound furiously to their elected officials and send out thoughts and messages that keep others spirits lifted.
Just think, in the National Security Agency in Utah, are phone calls, texts, emails, whatever, in English, other languages, or in code that are evidence of the plans to steal this election from Trump and no way can we get the evidence.
So much for “National Security.” It’s only national security if our enemies say it is.
So do we try to cheat more than the dems next time? We are sorely out of practice and may need a few election cycles to get it going and right, but I submit we should be able to anything the Dems do and better.
Per video: Can others remark on what this kind Veteran is saying.
Texas did not have legal “standing” because the wrong terminology was used?
Legally “State of Texas” is not the correct term, must be “Texas” to the Supremes.
Also the Solicitor General of “Texas” must file, or the case is “moot”?
TIA
The United States, as a Republic, is over. We’re well into the Principate stage of our nation: an illusion only of the former laws and systems of the past whilst power is concentrated and allocated outside of democratic process. 2016 and President Trump was probably the last chance of returning to the old ways without some form of revolutionary action.
Respectfully, short of a miracle with President Trump somehow pulling through via extra-judicial means, I believe he will not become President for a second term. I fully believe he is justified to do whatever it takes to retain power, and utilize it — however I doubt that he will. He has few allies around him in DC, and those whom he does have counsel him to seek relief in the courts. Yet this very judicial system he seeks to utilize to rectify wrongs is corrupt beyond repair, too. The courts, like most of our institutions, cannot function to self-stabilize any longer. They are rotted from within by those who seek gain of various forms. The Constitution has no value to most who hold public office – their eyes are concentrated on power.
I would love to be proven wrong, but I’ll finally be moving my family to a Red State from our Blue one. I don’t think things will remain safe here, and everywhere will get worse before they get better. In the meantime, when the time for remaking comes, some tough considerations must be given how, and why, things failed, and the methods used to corrupt the Constitution and the US Government.
Dems say – so what? We cheated to win, get over it.
Supreme Court says – we agree!!!
OK…can anyone, including Scotus tell us what it takes ‘to have standing’? Please, someone enlighten me.
An actual injury in a case or controversy.
The states each control their own laws, elections. No state even is required to hold an election for presidential Electors. It’s not the business of some other state. Sort of like your neighbor can’t take you to court because he doesn’t think you are making the right educational choices for your own kids — no standing. But he CAN report your abuse of them.
That’s why I keep saying Bill Barr. The “United States” has standing where there has been a violation of the constitutional rights of its citizens or a federal law.
Moreover, every legislature in these errant states has the power to fix this. Why are they not acting.
That’s baloney. Read the electors clause in tbe Constitution. No state would have ever joined the union if each state were allowed to hold elections for Federal office with no rules in place as to how they were run.
Well, hello deplorables!! If this is legal and no one has standing to file a lawsuit to be heard by the supremes, then this is how it will be.
So, in 2024, hang on–the Republicans can cheat like hell and after we win, the left has no standing..the supremes have created a precedent this very year.
WHAT WOULD YOU DO if you believed, like I do, that criminals of the worst sort had seized control of your nation’s key institutions?
Actually, that has already happened, with communists having captured all of the following:
• national press
• social media
• online platforms (e.g., Word Press)
• film/video industry
• judiciary (including U.S. foreign intelligence surveillance court, U.S. supreme court)
• legislative assemblies
• federal law enforcement (e.g., FBI, DOJ)
• national intelligence agencies (e.g., NSA, CIA)
• federal travel security agencies (e.g., TSA)
• federal health agencies (e.g., CDC, FDA, NIAID)
• teachers unions (e.g. SEIU)
• public universities
• secondary public school administrations
• corporate America
• many if not most federal bureaucracies
• many if not most state bureaucracies
• both major political parties
Would you expect a legal solution?
BUT what if legal means are themselves corrupted?
What if you learned that the source of much of this corruption was your country’s chief enemy?
What if you learned that your country’s elections were manipulated by communist China?
What if you were told that China had launched a backdoor Pearl Harbor, but American traitors had covered it up?
What then?
Would you say, “Oh, we patriots are limited to using only ‘legal’ means to fix things.”
But aren’t our political enemies defining what is “legal”?
As Davy Crockett once said, “There ain’t no ticks like poly-ticks! Bloodsuckers all!”
Imagine for a moment that the leader of your nation could legally invoke a much-used law called to save the day.
Wouldn’t you want him to use it?
Or would you be too afraid of the outcry from those very same corrupted institutions?
Isn’t that what we face?
Aren’t we all so conditioned to hesitate to plead for use of the Insurrection Act because we let evil people define what is “right”?
RULE #1: Never let your enemy define your strategy or tactics.
As Davy Crockett would say: “Be always sure you are right — then go ahead!”
Now the CCP will have standing and you will go to jail for life, have a nice day.
Eff the Supreme Court. Right square in the a**!
I worked 10 years for the Federal Courts and knew they would pull this crap off. The Judiciary has been compromised from the first election of the the cocaine dealing Clinton.
Nothing will change until we eliminate the DNC, FBI, CIA and NSA and most of the court system. These are the criminals.
Texas “perceived damages” turn into real damages in the coming months when Texas is overrun with Soros caravans.
Republic all but over lest the final grab in Ga to see whether FULL 100% destruction or a slimmer of hope.
I’m DONE with GOP. Run who they may and want; done being hooked and crooked by their efforts. THEY’VE DONE NOTHING for Trump the last 30 days NOR the 4Y he’s been in office. McCarthy and McConnell are the biggest traitors and talk the talk and walk the walk AS IF voting matters.
GOP DID NOTHING KNOWING Dems were working 24/7 the past 4Y TO STEAL, CHEAT THIS election. GOP KNEW. What DID GOP DO? NOTHING. They talk and tweet and sound so tough and big and are NO ACTION. dems fight like pit bulldogs, slit your throat, burn your cities down, destroy the culture and they don’t care. But, in the end, they WIN.
Next 4Y USA will cease to exist as the Republic we knew. And it was ALL DONE RIGHT BEFORE OUR EYES….
Long live the GOP. I’m ready for another Party, that fights for We The People, NOT the uniparty in DC that now exists. Dem/Republican; not one bit of difference.
People’s Patriot Party
must secede
ACB, BK and NG. What a trio. Couldn’t even look at the evidence. We would have been better off with Garland than Gorsuch. Garland wouldnt have made the disastrous decisions that Gorsuch made, especially in the making Oklahoma an Indian Reservation case.
Did anyone notice when Perdue and Loeffler’s polling was sinking that’s when 126 republicans signed on to the Texas lawsuit?
yup, “Party A” is back in control!
Yes, Supreme Court is now irrelevant. I suggest all treepers listen to this 30 minute audio by Mike Adams and if any of the legal eagles here could weigh in on this;
https://www.brighteon.com/1aa596c5-5147-4fcd-aaf8-a5611c27bf33
Oh well, I tried to wake up treepers. Wish Sundance would weigh in on this podcast.
I have been following Mike and several other credible patriots that are on the cutting edge of the behind the scenes possibilities and LEGAL options Trump has at his disposal to deal with this Communist Coup taking place. The Commie Cancer is so pervasive and our legal institutions so corrupted and compromised, I believe that President Trump has no other option to save America from the Communists, except to be bold and honor his oath to protect the Constitution and our Republic by invoking EO13848 and the Insurrection Act.
(482) Monkey Business Ep Zero One Fiver – YouTube
(482) Post Election Update #9: Military Mobilization Here & Abroad Indicating Serious Situation – YouTube
Meet like minded people, make friends, start organizing locally and get involved in politics. Run for office, encourage a conservative to run for office, support conservatism by volunteering for someone conservative already in office. Have you emailed, called, written or town hall spoken to your elected politicians at local, state and federal levels to tell them NO MORE ELECTRONIC VOTING! Paper ballots only! Picture ID’s for ALL voters or its Civil War… Literally! Do this or permanently resolve yourself to be a loser.
DO NOT RUN FOR OFFICE!…elections in this country are over…secede now
If this obviuosly fraudulent election stands; there will never be a “fair” election again. Polititions listen to the people who write their campaign checks; not the voters or constituents? I don’t see any way to change that dynamic.
An 8th-grader could find the clearly worded “originalist” text in the Constitution; why couldn’t the self-declared originalist find it? This could rank down at the bottom with Dred-Scott and Kelo?
Who will protect us all from rogue states now? Their AG’s? Guv’s? The UN? NATO? The Militias? The selected Jobama and the Kackler?
Your altruism sounds good but reality is until challenged Dominion or some other election system will continue to rig votes for the highest bidders.
A new more scientific way to evaluate the ballots. Please watch this video and give feedback, especially you science geeks.
everylegalvote.com is planning to pursue this strategy. https://youtu.be/UgeqGmvQXKs
I can see the court deciding to stay out of disputes intrastate because it is indeed political and can be remedied by the next vote. Illegalities there would be theoretically decided by state courts. But the extent to which fraud in one state can dilute the vote of citizens in another is what is at issue here and the Supreme Court is the right venue for that case. By punting, the SC left the question unresolved at a critical time for the republic. Really bad move and really disappointing for those of us who believed in rule-of-law.
THIS ELECTION WAS YOUR LAST VOTE
Since this election was a successful fraudulent scam, your last vote that counted was probably in 2018!
No, Ed, 2016 was our last vote. We just didn’t realize it.
“Remedied by the next vote”? What if the next vote is too late? We have been taught good lessons from ANTIFA/BLM. Its time wear black, and fight back! They didn’t get arrested, or punished. In fact, the FBI knelt for them!
“I can see the court deciding to stay out of disputes intrastate because it is indeed political and can be remedied by the next vote.”
Almost every case the Supreme Court takes has a political aspect to it, be it the merits of the case, the relationship of the plaintiffs to the defendents, the making of the laws and regulations involved, the enforcement of them, and on and on. For any court to say it is non-political, much less for the Supreme Court to say it and the federal judiciary are not a political branch, is simply not true. They may not be elected, but they are most definitely political. Roberts knows it to be true and lies when he says there are no Republican or Democrat judges.
As for being “remedied by the next vote”, if the 2020 election fraud is permitted to succeed and Biden and the rest of the anti-American Leftists get away with it, we may well never again have a free and fair election in this country, at least at the federal level. They will ensure the mechanisms of this fraud are refined and perfected by the next election, not corrected and punished. The next time they will have found ways to get the outcome they want without nearly as much opportunity for their opposition to discover and prove it. There will be no “next vote” that matters, because they will get the outcome they want no matter what. We will most likely never get a chance to fix it in the future. It must be corrected this time around.
Maybe one or the other of the cases still alive out there will succeed at the Supreme Court, but I believe the court turning down this case had more to do with Roberts’ skittishness about not wanting the court to be involved in such a hot issue. The junior justices may have merely bowed to his influence, or maybe they were the wrong picks to begin with. He does not want his precious court to be involved in another Gore v. Bush. He may also be naïvely trying to prevent the Court from being packed by the Left by not antagonizing them, but if they get their way they will do it.
Roberts wants to protect “the institution” (the Court), just like Barr wants to protect “the institution” (the DOJ and FBI). What they don’t realize or refuse to accept is it is the Constitution and the supremacy of the people over their precious institutions that is at stake here. If the people lose then their precious institutions will no longer matter. Their institutions will come complete tools of the totalitarian Left, doing their bidding against the people in any way the Leftists desire.