What I find very interesting in this Reuters “exclusive” report are the specific Baltic states mentioned. From the article:
….”Among the nations that have received messages urging them to keep public statements in check are Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia.” …
I would remind readers of the recent 1,000 drones supposedly deployed from Western Ukraine that flew through the airspace of this exact group of nations to attack St Petersburg, Russia. {GO DEEP}
CTH said at the time that given the logistics involved it was far more likely the drones were delivered to, and launched from, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia before crossing into Russian territory.
…“if you accept the narrative, the 1,000+ drones took off from western Ukraine, flew north through Poland, crossed Lithuania (a few crashed there) and then Latvia, and finally turned east toward St Petersburg from Estonia at the very end; again, presumably, to avoid Russian air defenses.
This complicated 1,000+ drone operation happened at exactly the same time Zelenskyy was creating a very specific narrative about being allowed to use Starshield for these types of targeting operations.” ~CTH October 20th
Is it just a coincidence that a report surfaces saying the Pentagon has requested these same three specific EU nations to stop their antagonisms as President Trump tries to come to a diplomatic resolution to this conflict?
Oct 30 (Reuters) – Pentagon officials have in recent weeks asked several NATO countries to tone down their rhetoric regarding the threat posed by Russia, arguing that some statements by European leaders and officials have undermined continental security, four people familiar with the matter said.
Among the nations that have received messages urging them to keep public statements in check are Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, said the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity. It was not clear if the messages, which were delivered in bilateral meetings, were conveyed to other European governments.
The US requests come as the Trump administration restarts an effort to press for a negotiated end to the full-scale war in Ukraine, now well into its fifth year. The latest push has blended incentives for Russia – including sanctions relief – with pressure on Ukraine to halt its attacks on Russian energy infrastructure.
Asked for comment, a Pentagon official said: “Private conversations among allies are just that, so we will not comment on these allegations.”
Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby, a key figure in an ongoing review of US troop levels in Europe, was one of the US officials delivering the message, the people said. Reuters could not determine what other officials were involved.
None of the people, who include three European officials and a US official, suggested the advice was communicated in a confrontational manner. (read more)
I’m not touching you but instead of a finger it is a nuclear knife.
I would hope that the Pentagon saying “tone it down” was done in such a way as to put the Fear of God into those nations.
I think “tone it down’ means” don’t expect the US to come to your aid if you antagonize Russia purposely “cause we ain’t”.
I think the Pentagon is telling the CIA to tone it down.
Just got this from my hairdresser:
I had a lady in yesterday who got a message from her nephew in the Navy in Iran that they were expecting something big to happen and were preparing . They’ve moved all the important people out and the soldiers are at the airports
This morning my husband called to let me know one of the guys he works with has a son in the Army stationed in Turkey. He just texted his dad that they are currently pulling ALL the troops out of Turkey.
So maybe you should do some extra prepping this week, just in case.
That would be called confrontational. We can only hope.
NATO v Russia when America backs away be like ….
I don’t think Trump fears Russia, I do think he doesn’t want to get into a prolonged useless expensive war that gets millions of Americans killed in battles. Make sense to me.
Agree.. and IMO
Russia is more like us at this time then Europe (green energy) ..
I can’t get over how brazen the West is in attacking Russia. We would have never done this with the Soviets.
Right…because they would be both communist. Get it?
Excellent post!
October surprise??
The delusion that war can be ended by ”negotiations” has a death grip on the USA and Western politicians.
The cycle of violence, reaction, ceasefires, and agreements has kept the Middle East war between Islam and the Jewish state going for 75 years.
They can’t be stupid enough to believe that, so it must be something else.
General MacArthur said ” In war, there is no substitute for victory.”
The Russian general staff knows that.
They cannot leave a Nazi-inspired hostile outpost of NATO in Ukraine.
The lure of endless profits from rebuilding a place that they made endless profits from destroying is just evil.
We are ruled over by psychopaths.
when i hear “tone it down”,
i think “if you all don’t knock it off, i’ll turn this car around right now!”
which would be fine, policy wise. 🤣
Ukraine and Zelensky are like the little cry baby tattle tail kid in school that causes a problem and then runs to the teacher to tattle and hides behind the teachers skirt. Ive never seen a more pitiful leader in my life. He’s a sniveling cry baby. He has a hurt, poor me look on his face all the time. Sniffing away, not sure if its from the lines of coke or the sniveling he learned while growing up and playing victim. I mean this guy comes from nowhere, and all of a sudden he is president of Ukraine??
The Deep State paid good money for the little coke head! 😂😂
NAILED IT!!!
You are unsure if Z’s endless nose rubbing is due to a cocaine habit, Deb?
Shirley, you dissemble .. and yes I just called you Shirley
Pouty and defiant!
Step 1: Pull any and all US troops and equipment stationed in these three countries, then we will see how bold they are. If they wish to continue to poke the bear, it’s on them and they will have earned the consequences.
NATO is a defensive organization. Countries which affirmatively seek armed conflict should be booted out of the organization. If belligerent countries can not be ejected, then the US should resign its membership.
The Baltic States (yes, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia) have profoundly negative memories of their post-WWII experience under the iron fist of the USSR. (Is anyone here old enough to remember Captive Nations Week?) So they are still understandably paranoid about Russia. Once the USSR went the trip, they even (to the horror of “human rights” advocates) expelled many families who themselves or whose relatively recent forebears had been planted there by the USSR. What they do need is reassurance and an understanding of their quite recent history.
.. and the Russians have profound memories of the NAZIS Friekorps operations in these very same Baltic States after WWI.
The Russians also have a profound memory and knowledge of history dating back to the 1700’s … for ALL the one-way traffick by Sweden, Prussia, France,Germany and NATO through the Baltic States to destroy Russia.
… and having those same nations willingly join the ranks of the invading Europeans.
Especially galling since Russia has saved Western Europe from itself: i.e. Swedish invasions, French invasions, German invasions since the 1700’s …. only to be repaid with allowing Lenin to immigrate to Russia and conducting invasions.
Russian Troops even marched in the victory parade in Paris after Napoleon was defeated … then went home.
Recorded history can be a real booger if actually read.
Geee … and it was Prussia and Poland who have invaded occupied and terrorized the Baltic States as well throughout history.
Absolutely correct.
In most parts of Europe there are centuries old bad blood between neighbours. (The 20th century WW1-2 treaties made a lot of things even worse in this regard.)
There are very few countries who were able to overcome it or have actually “good memories and connections” with each other.
In recent years quite a few of them have deteriorated even.
What is actually the major cause of concern regarding the EU leaderships warmongering messages is the total lack of reality.
They would lose any kind of war they enter. Without nukes.
Simply because their armies and soldiers do not have a stable country to support them.
Almost every western EU nation (and some of the northern ones like Sweden and Norway) have at least a 5% muslim migrant population. Most have more. If we consider the illegals as well, i would say that for instance in France this ratio is higher than 10%, more likely sitting closer to 15%.
They are also overwhelmingly among the younger generation.
Teens and in their twenties. And males.
The moment an EU country sends its army away, it can now face the risk of an insurrection, coup, riot, basicly any form of disruption of government and state. And quite literally the fall of the State.
If you add to it that there are other immigrants there as well who might be possibly hostile towards the country depending on the war, this ratio climbs higher. (For instance if there was a war with Russia, pretty sure quite a few of the chinese immigrants would be working with China’s security services. If the US and Canada have issues with chinese spies i wonder how bad the situation is in the EU.)
This is also a major divide between the western and eastern part of the EU. West from Austria and Germany, there is almost no mentionable muslim population. (Former Warsaw Pact and Yugoslavia members.)
So a war with Russia would rely on them heavily, because they have a stable home country.
And since they are also closer to Russia they would bear the blunt of the war.
Their already homogenous native population would take a direct hit.
I am not actually sure that this is not at least part of the plan. To destroy their “manpower” just like they did with ukraine and be able to trigger another mass migration event.
Ukraine Shatters Strike Pause With Major Drone Attack On Russian Oil Refinery, Defying Trump-
Friday, Oct 30, 2026 – 05:25 AM
Russia’s sprawling Novokuibyshevsk Oil Refinery in the Samara region is on fire on Friday, after suffering what appear to be multiple and widespread hits of a Ukrainian drone attack wave, with several pillars of smoke rising high above the complex, and seen for miles.
Curiously, news of the fresh attack emerged just hours after the Wall Street Journal reported the Zelensky government had paused refinery strikes under pressure from the Trump administration.
Little peckerheads! Just a phrase I’ve heard, nothing I normally use, so lack of a better one!
You were right on the mark last week.
These EU and NATO countries are not going to stop attacking Russia unless something drastic happens to them.
Suggesting anything else is just wishful thinking.
Once Trump’s turn in office is over the establishment politicians will go back to business as usual.
And that includes Vance and Rubio.
The EU is a communist state, no different than the old USSR. And like the USSR, the EU is constantly antagonizing its neighbors, hoping to plunder more resources and relieve some of its crushing debt. Even after the old USSR collapsed, there remained thousands of bitter clingers who hated capitalism. This is how it will go once again with the EU.
Christine Lagarde is jumping ship as ECB president. She and the other central bankers know what’s about to happen. She’s just the first rat to jump. But even as the EU sinks further into poverty, there will remain bitter clingers who continue trying to antagonize Russia. Eventually, the EU will collapse entirely and the former communist states will regain their sovereignty. The bitter clingers will fade into irrelevance, and maybe we won’t be bothered by western communists again for another generation or two.
Winter is upon them it’s about to get very ugly without any heat source. Green idiocies are about to freeze the populace
Concurring nations since the beginning of time!
@sundance How can I email you rackspace says you’re blocking my email address?
I’ve never emailed you before…
Stop poking the bear!