At this point it’s not funny how this happens. In reality those who follow DC events will note this is almost an exact replay of earlier Lawfare battles surrounding the FISA warrant public release. Same characters, same arguments, same players, same corrupt intents. [Redacted DOJ Filing Here]
In 2017/2018 the issue was corrupt DC interests arguing for the public release of a top secret classified document, the title-1 FISA surveillance warrant used against Carter Page. The warrant was already leaked to the media on March 17, 2017, when the lawfare assembly later wanted to exploit it.
In the 2026 re-run, the issue surrounds the DHS/HSI search warrant executed against Ilhan Omar. The DOJ wants to keep it sealed until the warrant has been fully executed, implying there are alternative parties who have been requested to provide additional information. The Lawfare group want the search warrant details released to the public now so the allied group can organize and exploit public defenses.
Neither the FISA warrant nor a HSI search warrant had/have ever been released prior to full execution therein. DC Judge James Boasberg, a horrible man of intemperate and corrupt disposition, will now decide the release of the latter.
WASHINGTON – […] The battle over whether to unseal the search warrant comes amid two separate federal investigations into the Democratic congresswoman stemming from concerns about discrepancies between financial disclosures filed a year apart and allegations that her father committed fraud when completing immigration paperwork. Omar immigrated to the United States from Somalia in 1995, when she was 12 years old. Investigators are examining whether her father misstated her age on his citizenship paperwork in 2000, potentially allowing her to obtain citizenship through him as a minor.
But the fight over whether to unseal the records is being overseen by Chief Judge James Boasberg of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, an Obama appointee and longtime target of Trump.
[…] Days after Department of Homeland Security Investigations and the FBI conducted a raid on Omar’s home under a search warrant issued by U.S. Magistrate Judge Matthew Sharbaugh, three separate requests were made to unseal the warrant — by the New York Times; Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group; and 14 press organizations.
Boasberg ordered the Justice Department to defend its position on keeping the warrant sealed in response to a consolidated request from the Times and 14 press organizations by Oct. 22, but he extended the deadline following a Justice Department request to wait until the search warrant was “fully executed.”
The Justice Department argued that releasing the information could compromise the integrity of the investigation. (read more)
No one should be silly enough to believe the target Ilhan Omar didn’t already share the warrant with political allies as it was delivered to her and her representatives during execution.
IMHO, without a doubt the media already have the executed warrant in their hands, the Lawfare operatives have reviewed the content and defensive meetings and strategy sessions have already taken place in person and in chat groups with ideologically aligned jour-o-listers.
The alternative is to believe that Ilhan Omar did not share it with democrat leadership, the DSA group, media allies, advocates and lawyers who represent her interests. So, the question is, should the same search warrant background be made public?
All of the advocates and lawyers may have full knowledge of the material in the search warrant; however, they are not able to execute the public defense strategy without revealing that Omar has given it to them. Thus, they want it public.
Enter, Judge James Boasberg who, not coincidentally was the central figure in the Title-1 FISA Warrant request from 2017, and who will now be the decisionmaker on whether -for the first time in history- a search warrant was released to the public prior to the fully executed process to obtain the material that is inside the warrant itself.
The public release of a non-fully executed search warrant has never happened before.
The public release of a Title-1 Surveillance Warrant (the CP FISA warrant) also never happened before, until suddenly it was released in 2018…. for some odd reason (never explained), despite the national security shield that surrounds the entire FISA system, which easily blocks any public releases.
The Carter Page FISA Warrant was already leaked to the media at the time it was being requested to be released. The media couldn’t admit they had the warrant…. but they wanted to exploit a narrative around it…. so they wanted it officially made public. This is a similar scenario.


Everything seems to land on Boasberg’s desk. I’ll be happy when the desk lands on Boasberg!
More than just the desk.
One has to wonder is he is actively pursuing these cases against the law? If Boasberg had any integrity he would turn down any case involving the the Trump administration because of his public statements, Arctic Frost involvement and numerous overturned cases. Obviously the clown judge Bozoberg has no integrity, ethics or morals.
After the head shot.
Well, guess that is that. Any of us who thought what-ever-her-name-is would ever be held accountable now know the answer.
No one above the law…..Funny that……😡😡😡😡 The levels of corruption just keep going up.
“No one is above the law”- except those who make the laws, litigate the laws, enforce the laws, judge the laws & their enforcement.
So the entire incestous legal system is the problem.
Incestous indeed.
Notice a lot of cases are being overturned as the Federal prosecutor is an illegal appointment on past the 120 days. But the Democrats have stated flat out that they will confirm no Trump appointee. The Republicans have held fake Senate sessions during recess to stop President Trump from making recess appointment. So he can’t make an permanent appointment, and the DNC lawyers and corrupt judges drag these cases out past the 120 days so the Federal prosecutors become illegal. So how can President Trump make a legal appointment? He can’t.
Federally charged crimes has been thrown out by judges saying the prosecutor appointment was an illegal appointment
James Comey: 2 counts—making a false statement to Congress and obstructing a congressional investigation.
Letitia James: 2 counts—bank fraud and making a false statement to a financial institution.
(Judge Cameron Currie dismissed both indictments on November 24, 2025, finding Lindsey Halligan had no lawful authority to obtain them.)
Also:
Cassidy Hutchinson, who testified about the presidential vehicle on January 6. That is a separate matter: a Washington grand jury recently declined to indict her over her testimony.
A judge ruled Bill Essayli was unlawfully serving and barred him from overseeing two prosecutions—but declined to dismiss those indictments.
Protecting deep state criminals and thwarting legal prosecutions. None of these cases have been decided on merit. Dan Ball even did a segment on this on OAN.
Just another example of why we are spinning out of control. Congress can fix this but not with the bums there now.
So we are not too dissimilar from Brazil; the court judge(s) run the country.
At the top of the heap?
Emperor Roberts who has turned the office of the President into a supplicant that must have the emperor’s own permission to take any/every action.
When Congress wants to do something it gets done. In 1976, about 12,000 former college and university students, still not in recovery from the 1973-1976 recession that knocked out 1.5 million manufacturing jobs and opened with US default on the Gold Exchange Standard (Gold exchanged for dollars on demand at 35 dollars an ounce) and the first OPEC Embargo, and resulted in 50 years of real wages unable to keep up with inflation, attempted to declare bankruptcy on $21 million in student loans. That’s a drop in the bucket to the $1.6 trillion people want to get rid of now. Congress immediately exercised its authority over the Bankruptcy Court imposing regulations on when the courts could discharge federally guaranteed student loans. The Courts obeyed as they did several other steps over the years to deny discharge by bankruptcy of student loans. Here they are starting in 1976:
Changes to the Treatment of Education Loans in Bankruptcy
1976 – Higher Education Act amended to provide that federal student loans must be in repayment for at least five years to be eligible for discharge in bankruptcy, absent a showing of undue hardship
1978 – Bankruptcy Code amended to provide that loans from governmental units or nonprofit institutions of higher education may not be discharged prior to the expiration of the five-year waiting period, except upon a showing of undue hardship
1979 – Education loans guaranteed or insured pursuant to the Higher Education Act are added to those covered by the nondischargeability provisions; periods of deferment and forbearance deemed to suspend the five-year waiting period extended to all covered loans
1984 – Private, credit-based education loans made by nonprofit entities, including state-affiliates, are added to those covered by the nondischargeability provisions
1990 – Waiting period increased to seven years
1998 – Waiting period is eliminated, requiring a showing of undue hardship no matter how long a loan has been in repayment
2005 – Private, credit-based education loans made by taxable entities are added to those covered by the nondischargeability provisions
Whenever anyone saw a crack in the Congress’ determination to stop any bankruptcy taking out student loans, they would close the loophole immediately. Their reaction always depends upon how the individual members of House and Senate decide an issue is important. They can move like lightning, or permit any President to exercise as much authority as that President dares to solve a problem they are too chicken to address.
I guess the DOJ needs to investigate Boasberg. I don’t know how or if that is possible.
Oh, I know how but I can’t say it here! 🤭🙊
The Congress has the authority to stop Boasberg cold. The Congress regulates the INFERIOR COURTS, not SCOTUS. The Congress created those courts and the Congress can regulate such matters as the JURISDICTION of that court. I put an example right about Born Free American Woman’s post about how the Congress kept blocking the Bankruptcy Courts from discharging federally guaranteed student loans. That is the best example of how damn fast they can go about something that they prioritize above most other issues.
We will never rid ourselves of the perversion of the legal system which is referred to as lawfare so long as politically motivated judges remain on the bench.
Weaponization of the legal system is IMHO the same as RICO and all lawyers and judges inside and outside government who politicize the legal system are corrupt conspirators.
It’s D.C., a district so corrupt that only the hopelessly naive could expect anything else. Boasberg is the frosting on the process cake.
Exactly, JoAnn!
Boasberg, and those like him, provide the patina (frosting) of authenticity, which facilitates the ongoing corruption (process) hidden underneath.
Boasberg is what happens when the senate judiciary committee (currently led by Grassley) sit on their hands and do nothing.
What public defence strategy is going to save her, unless the warrant’s have been drawn up incorrectly, or sabotaged by a stay-behind. I’m assuming Team Trump made sure the former didn’t occur and that steps were put into place to prevent the latter.
I’d also suggest that this might just have been bait for one of the ‘bear traps’ that the Administration keep talking about, but people keep forgetting.
Our good guys can say they did something.
We will smile like red Barron pizza guy.
Then the prank happens and judge will let it off the hook for reasons.
We wont get as mad as red baron pizza guy. Until we do, then this will keep happening.
Nuff to piss off the Good Humor man
Satan is giggling
100% certain corruption will continue the path of evil.