The U.S. Treasury Department said Tuesday it is imposing $1.2 billion in fines on Bank of America for compliance violations resulting in lax efforts to curtail money laundering activity. The fines on America’s second-biggest bank amount to the third-largest in the department’s history. [Treasury Notice Here]
Money laundering for Latin-American narcotraffickers, terrorists as well as sketchy individuals/organizations that continue avoiding U.S. Treasury sanctions appear to be the heart of the matter.
WASHINGTON—The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) today announced a $750 million civil money penalty against Bank of America, N.A. (bank), for violations of the Bank Secrecy Act and its implementing regulations, including 12 CFR 21.21 and 12 CFR 21.11. This amount is the largest in OCC history. The bank is also subject to a December 2024 cease-and-desist order (2024 Order), which requires the bank to address its deficient Bank Secrecy Act/anti-money laundering (BSA/AML) compliance program.
“Bank of America, N.A., is the second largest bank in the U.S. and the sixth largest in the world. Every year, it processes hundreds of trillions of dollars in transactions across the globe. It has a high, and increasing, risk profile for money laundering, terrorist financing and other illicit activities. Almost two years ago, the bank signed an order with the OCC and committed to fixing its longstanding BSA deficiencies. Despite its obligation to the American people as a national-chartered, global systemically important bank, the bank’s BSA/AML compliance program continues to reflect widespread breakdowns in internal controls, which threatens U.S. national and economic security” said Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan V. Gould. “The bank’s poor response to its BSA deficiencies is unacceptable. The second largest bank’s egregious and continued BSA violations warrant the OCC imposing its largest CMP ever assessed against a bank. The OCC expects all banks to have an effective BSA/AML compliance program. Those that do not can expect swift and significant action from the OCC.”
The OCC found that the bank’s BSA/AML compliance program has been deficient and ineffective. The bank’s deficient transaction monitoring system resulted in the bank failing to properly monitor trillions of dollars in transactions. This caused the bank to file large numbers of late suspicious activity reports (SARs) involving billions of dollars. Many of the late SARs had indicia of money laundering. The bank knew for years that it was failing to escalate potentially suspicious activities to investigators for review to determine if a SAR should be filed but failed to correct this serious BSA violation.
In addition, the bank’s BSA Officer and staff lacked sufficient skills and expertise to effectively manage the bank’s BSA/AML program. Key BSA personnel did not receive appropriate training regarding suspicious activity identification, investigation, and reporting, which resulted in the bank filing inaccurate and late SARs. The BSA audit function failed to identify long-standing BSA concerns that examiners subsequently uncovered.
After agreeing to the 2024 Order, the bank still failed to prioritize BSA/AML compliance. The bank did not complete many of the significant steps needed to establish an effective BSA/AML compliance program and its program continues to have significant breakdowns. For example, more than a year after the 2024 Order, the bank still failed to escalate potentially suspicious activities to investigators for review. Additionally, the bank processed potential trade-based money laundering transactions due to a systemic gap in its transaction monitoring program. Bank management failed to ensure the bank had an effective BSA/AML compliance program and continued to minimize the program’s significant deficiencies.
The OCC is taking this action in coordination with an action by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), which is assessing a $1.2 billion fine that credits the OCC’s $750 million penalty and is requiring remedial action by the bank. The OCC-assessed penalty will be paid to the U.S. Treasury. {SOURCE}
Money laundering is at the core of the issue!
Flashback to July, 2026…
Prime Minister Carney and Volodymr Zelenskyy announced a new Canada-based financial institution called the Defense, Security and Resilience Bank (DSRB). {source}
CANADA – […] “Mark Carney, welcomed the support for the Canada-led DSRB by: Albania, Belgium, Greece, Latvia, Luxembourg, Romania, Türkiye, and Ukraine. These countries will be entrusted with defining the initial policies and directives of the Bank, shaping its operations and ensuring benefits flow to members’ economies.”
[…] Leveraging a strong credit rating, the Bank will provide long-term, low-cost financing for defence, security, and resilience initiatives across supply chains.” (more)
When you see the term “resilience initiatives” think climate change. Specifically, think carbon capture and carbon trading mechanisms.
Perhaps this move by U.S. Treasury can also be viewed as a countereffort against the financial schemes of the banking elite who have been coordinating efforts against the carbon-friendly nationalists. Just worth remembering.

Hear moaning sounds from the war wanters.
I can’t speak for the C Suite, but DEI was strong at the branch level of BOA. Not to mention most times I couldn’t understand the tellers because of their thick foreign accents. And being a 30+ year customer with a healthy checking and savings account balance, they wouldn’t even give me or my son a loan for him to buy a used truck. Closed all accounts and went to a credit union.
Also, they were lock step with reporting information to the fedgov if withdrawals were over a certain amount or if deposits were “unusually high”, whatever that means.
My guess…the lying where media will blame Trump…but note this has been going on since December 2024…DT wasn’t in office yet.. so even though BOA was shilling for the Biden government they still got bit. Of course there may have been winks and nods. The actual story will never come to light. It never does.
If it was strong at the branch level, It was stronger in the C Suite. A good banker would not touch DEI with a ten foot pole or give it a loan.
BAC C Suite are virtue-signaling assholes. The highly visible branch level DEI is simply shit rolling downhill.
These were NOT unintentional mistakes in banking activities. Bank of America knew exactly what they were doing and deliberately breaking federal law because they were making so much profit from their money laundering.
The Trump administration should bring criminal charges against specific senior officers of the bank and put them in prison where they belong. Monetary penalties should not be assessed JUST against the bank but reach into the pockets of the big shot criminals running the bank. Hit the lawbreaking scoundrels in THEIR OWN pocketbooks.
Some of you might remember, I am a supporter of the banks and banking system. To think that banks make loans for the DEI and ESG and promote those policies is minor league. Yes, there are bankers that eagerly push those policies and they are bad bankers trying to seek favor from the Federal Government. A good banker would not loan money or push policies that are doomed to fail. It is anti capitalist.
That being said, I am a proponent of Too Big To Fail. BOA’s fine is a drop in the bucket for a bank of that size. What needs to happen is BOA needs to be broken into pieces and sold off. The BOA people involved need to be fired and the chain of command that allowed it to happen need to be prosecuted. Also the staff of the OCC that allowed it to happen need to be fired and if there is foul play prosecuted.
A pittance of a fine is nothing to BOA. There has to be Negative Consequences and Prosecution for criminal behavior.
They have always been nice to me. Except for that one loud mouthed German teller who got canned.
To get a better sense of scale: BoA reported $30.5B in profit in 2025. Median personal income in 2025 was ~$47k, so a $1.2B fine for BoA would be like that median person being fined about $1850. A fine like that would get your attention, but it probably wouldn’t drive you into ruin. And getting BoA’s attention was probably the goal here. Letting them know that they are being watched and will be held to account for their behavior.
(Edited because I miscalculated the fine as 1.6B at first – oops)
Maybe They can discover a few hundred more NGOs and their money trails while they’re at it. It would be nice if Neville Singham and his type are at least a little bit more worried now.
Treasury BS The Best ever had,