Susan Kokinda from the Promethean Action PAC returns to their Lyndon LaRouche roots and describes the American 250th Birthday Celebration through the prism of modern Britain.
…”Kokinda connects the Declaration’s appeal to the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God to economics, quoting Lyndon LaRouche on a state shaping a nation’s relationship to the physical universe. She highlights speeches by Jamieson Greer and Scott Bessent on production over consumption, and J.D. Vance’s call for a Hamiltonian approach grounded in human dignity, linking it to the Declaration’s “pursuit of happiness” over “property.”… WATCH:
.
Amid the Promethean group, Kokinda appears to be the voice with greatest connection to traditional LaRouche thinking. Her partner, Barbara Boyd, appears to be the more pragmatic end of the LaRouche spectrum, accepting things President Trump does more as they are, without having to pigeon-hole the motive into the narrow LaRouche view.
Meh, but at the end of the day – it’s all just an information buffet.
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
·
47m
Europe is learning that when you take in Third World criminals, you become a Third World Country. It happens quickly, in just a blink of the eye. I was elected just in time!!! President DJT
“Meh, but at the end of the day – it’s all just an information buffet.” <- IKR.
The “pursuit of happiness” is actually the most basic way to produce “capitalism” in society and a natural way to promote it with people. Do what you love for a living and you will never work. And in our country, the sky is the limit to what you can achieve with a little luck.
The communist socialist seizes the means of production and takes away your choice.
N/M
That term “pursuit if happiness” was also a way to include property without codifying slavery back then…
I wish Sundance or somebody would explain what he means by “the narrow LaRouche view”.
I can’t tell if you’re being dismissive with the “Lydon LaRouce” reference or not.
End of the day, what these Women are talking about with the British Empire and the control over the United States for the last 125 years makes a hell of a lot of sense. I find them both logical and refreshing.
It make sense, but perhaps gets repetitive when this is the basic premise indicated for everything. At least Barbara Boyd speaks of other issues. I find Kokinda’s constant referral to ‘The American System’ in the context of j about everything, a bit ‘narrow’
“. . . just an information buffet”
Maybe, but these Promethean folks are the only ones talking about President Trump resurrecting Hamilton’s ideas of national sovereignty and autarchic economic development. Turns out the President was saying the same thing back in the first term, referencing Lincoln and McKinley. I wasn’t aware of his interest in the Hamiltonian ‘American System’; it explains a lot of this administration’s strategy. How valid Promethean’s ‘London’ lens is I don’t know, but they are explaining a lot of the hostility to President Trump from the Europeans.
TCM aired this today. Other than the saccharine musical tunes, it was a pretty informative watch.
Matthew Ehret, a Canadian historian, brings receipts on this very subject.
https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/the-real-reason-aaron-burr-killed?publication=260045&post_id=205011502&r=26ok0b&triedRedirect=true
He has volumes of books on the history of the Americas… and the British do pop up frequently with respect to working against American interests. He apparently also has ties to Lyndon LaRoche. And maybe LaRoche was cancelled like Ron Paul, Pat Buchan and almost VSGDJT. I am now with greater than a decade reading CTH.
Always enjoy listening to these updates. Makes me proud to be American and aware of who are enemies may be.
I say this from half a world away. I’m half American, half English, yet I know which side my bread is buttered on. Yes, I have a connection to “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.”
Happy 250th Birthday to you. May you prosper for the next 250 years.
Kind wishes and regards from an Australian,
Climate Heretic
Between the two, Barbara Boyd is my favorite. Susan Kokinda rails on and on about ‘the American System’ and there is not a subject where she does’t revert back to the City of London. I get it (or got it, the first time I heard it), but the repetitive nature of this begins to lose its luster. On the other hand, I find Barbara Boyd very interesting to listen to.
Between the two, Barbara Boyd is my favorite. Susan Kokinda rails on and on about ‘the American System’ and there is not a subject where she does’t revert back to the City of London. I get it (or got it, the first time I heard it), but the repetitive nature of this begins to lose its luster. On the other hand, I find Barbara Boyd very interesting to listen to.