Earlier today Rudy Giuliani appears on One America News to discuss the importance of getting evidence of voter fraud before key state legislatures and the pathway of litigation to the supreme court. WATCH:
Earlier today Rudy Giuliani appears on One America News to discuss the importance of getting evidence of voter fraud before key state legislatures and the pathway of litigation to the supreme court. WATCH:
Are there any other than these 6 states that should also be challenged in court?
VA
Pennsylvania trial court rules the 2020 election was likely unconstitutional in Pennsylvania, and that gives state legislators power to choose electors.
https://marklevinshow.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/301/2020/11/Memorandum-Opinion-Filed.pdf
HUGE decision issued by Commonwealth Court Judge Patricia McCullough
This is interesting since PA SC is now in the position to actually hear the evidence or let the decision stand. Now they are in a pickle, especially if the USSC rule in favor of Trump as well. Won’t look good for them no matter how you dice it.
One of the footnotes near the end, “The U.S. Supreme Court has addressed various circumstances concerning disenfranchisement of votes. For instance, it has held the right to vote is foundational to our Republic and this fundamental right “can be denied by a debasement or dilution of the weight of a citizen’s vote just as effectively as by wholly prohibiting the free exercise of the franchise.” Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 555 (1964). Reynolds, which established the “one person, one vote” doctrine, is the seminal case on voter dilution. Under this concept, a mail-in voting process that would exceed the limits of absentee voting prescribed in Pa. Const. Article VII sec 14 could be construed as violating the “one person one vote.” In that event, the sheer magnitude of the number of mail-in ballots would not be a basis to disregard not only this provision of the Pennsylvania Constitution but also the “one person, one vote” doctrine established by Reynolds, one of the bedrock decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court.”
This is good stuff, and it completely contradicts some of the other court rulings lately saying that it’s basically better to accept some illegal votes than risk disenfranchising voters…in effect saying that illegal votes matter more than the legal ones (lower standards).
This Judge is a smart cookie. She knows and appears to fully understand the gravity of the moment and does not flinch from it.
CNN
Straightforward from here:
GOP controls state legislatures in key swing states
Legislatures convinced of fraud; send own/no electors
Biden deprived of 270
State delegations in House re-elect Trump 26-23
“So the outcome would be to re-elect Donald Trump.”
https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1332497710356770818
And the MSN is admitting there is a legitimate issue with the election even if they don’t say it outright. Now those with low information start asking what’s really going on in larger numbers.
“State delegations in House re-elect Trump 26-23”. That’s 49. Are you assuming Liz Cheney will bug out on us?
It feels like the law of unintended consequences is about to come crashing down on the Uniparty, the MSM and the country in a hundred different ways.
For example, the Georgia Senate race, with President Trump safely re-elected, would have been a slam dunk for the GOP. Now? Why would Georgia voters be enthusiastic about the same Republican Party that perpetrated massive voter fraud?
Exactly
Huge news in PA!!
https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1332534764558016519?s=21
https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1332537879202050050?s=21
https://twitter.com/prayingmedic/status/1332537168892289026?s=21
One possible ruling by the US Supreme Court would be that the State Houses have the right to choose which Electorates will be used to elect the President. and not the State Sec. of State. This might lead to a Trump victory. The Democrats in response would have their Democrats Governors in convening another state assembly to choose a separate group of electorate in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. Kind of like what happen in Kansas before the Civil War. To competing conventions of statehood. This would lead to 2 president elects. This would lead to who would Justice Roberts swear in.
Giuliani’s got nothing more than sworn affidavit hearsay evidence?
It’s not hearsay. Watch the Pennsylvania hearing. Devastating stuff
Here’s another great article from the Louisiana Central City News showing in great detail just how the election was stolen, using the NY Slimes OWN numbers which they recorded but did not report on.
It’s all there in black and white: 104,894 votes were stolen in Georgia and 347,768 were stolen in Pennsylvania. I have not seen this article in too many places.
https://www.centralcitynews.net/eedition/central/page-a01/page_65d0fadb-ee82-5b80-955b-4aabe3c1a546.html
It’s not hearsay. Watch the Pennsylvania hearing. Devastating stuff
It’s not hearsay. Watch the Pennsylvania