Clinton Emails and FBI Activity Back in News as NY FBI Agent Talks – Fills-in CTH Background Research…

The Washington Examiner has an interesting article based on a book excerpt by Washington Post journalist Devlin Barrett: “October Surprise: How the FBI Tried to Save Itself and Crashed an Election.”

CTH readers will remember Devlin Barrett was Lisa Page & Peter Strzok’s favored journalist to receive FBI leaks from Clinton email investigation known as the “mid-year-exam;” during the time when the ‘small group’ was framing the preferred narrative.

According to the article the NY FBI Agent who raised the alarm bells was a man named John Robertson.  Robertson was cited in the IG report, but not named.  According to the recent discoveries…

“Robertson wrote a “Letter to Self” in late October after an Oct. 19, 2016, meeting, during which he implored Assistant U.S. Attorney Amanda Kramer of the Southern District of New York to push FBI leadership to look at the thousands of emails he had unearthed.”

“I have very deep misgivings about the institutional response of the FBI to the congressional investigation into the Hillary Clinton email matter. … Put simply: I don’t believe the handling of the material I have by the FBI is ethically or morally right. But my lawyer’s advice — that I simply put my SSA on notice should cover me — is that I have completed CYA [Cover Your Ass], and I have done so,” Robertson wrote. “Further, I was told by [Kramer] that should I ‘whistleblow,’ I will be prosecuted.” (read more)

Robertson fills in the background to our earlier research.  CTH identified how the FBI never actually investigated the emails, as the FBI and specifically former FBI Director James Comey, claimed: “due to the wizardry of technology.”

Within this earlier interview Mr. Comey is questioned about the announcement of re-opening of the Hillary Clinton email investigation on October 28th, 2016.

In his response about why there was a delay between the FBI being notified by New York on September 28th, and waiting until October 28th, James Comey revealed a very important nugget.

The New York U.S. Attorney (SDNY) called Main Justice in DC to ask about why they were not receiving authority for a search warrant. We knew that call took place on October 21st, 2016. Now we know “why” and who New York called at DOJ HQ.

Listen closely to James Comey at 06:06 to 07:30 of the interview (prompted):

Baier: “Did you know that Andrew McCabe, your deputy, had sat on that revelation about the emails”?

Comey: “Yeah, I don’t know that, I don’t know that to be the case. I do know that New York and FBI headquarters became aware that there may be some connection between Weiner’s laptop and the Clinton investigation, weeks before it was brought to me for decision – and as I write in the book I don’t know whether they could have moved faster and why the delay”

Baier: “Was it the threat that New York Agents were going to leak that it existed really what drove you to the ‘not conceal’ part?

Comey: “I don’t think so. I think what actually drove it was the prosecutors in New York who were working the criminal case against Weiner called down to headquarters and said ‘are we getting a search warrant or not for this’? That caused, I’m sorry, Justice Department Headquarters, to then call across the street to the FBI and poke the organization; and they start to move much more quickly. I don’t know why there was, if there was slow activity, why it was slow for those first couple of weeks.”

There’s some really sketchy stuff going on in that answer. Why would SDNY need to get authorization for a search warrant from DC, if this is about Weiner’s laptop?

Yes, you could argue it pertains to a tightly held Clinton investigation run out of DC but the Weiner prosecution issues shouldn’t require approval from DC.

But let’s take Comey at face-value…. So there we discover it was justice officials within SDNY (Southern District of New York) who called Main Justice (DOJ in DC) and asked about a needed search warrant for “this”, presumably Weiner’s laptop by inference. Now, let’s go look at the Page/Strzok description of what was going on.

Here are the messages from Lisa Page and Peter Strzok surrounding the original date that New York officials notified Washington DC FBI. It’s important to note the two different entities: DOJ -vs- FBI.

According to the September 28, 2016, messages from FBI Agent Peter Strzok it was the SDNY in New York telling Andrew McCabe in DC about the issue. Pay close attention to the convo:

(pdf source for all messages here)

Notice: “hundreds of thousands of emails turned over by Weiner’s attorney to SDNY”.

Pay super close attention. This is not an outcome of a New York Police Dept. raid on Anthony Weiner. This is Weiner’s attorney going to the U.S. attorney and voluntarily turning over emails. The emails were not turned over to the FBI in New York, the actual emails were turned over to the U.S. Attorney in the Southern District.

Key point here: Weiner’s attorneys turned over “emails”.

♦If the U.S. Attorney in New York has the emails on September 28th, 2016, why would they need a search warrant on October 21st, 2016? (Comey’s call explanation)

♦Why would Weiner’s attorney be handing over evidence?

Think about this carefully. I’ll get back to the importance of it later; but what I suspect is that Weiner had material that was his “insurance policy” against anything done to him by Hillary Clinton. Facing a criminal prosecution Weiner’s lawyer went to the U.S. Attorney and attempted to exploit/leverage the content therein on his client’s behalf.

Fast forward three weeks, and we go back to FBI in DC.

On October 21, 2016, this is the call referenced by James Comey in the Bret Baier interview. Someone from New York called “Main Justice” (the DOJ National Security Division in DC) and notified DOJ-NSD Deputy Asst. Attorney General George Toscas of the Huma Abedin/Hillary Clinton emails via the “weiner investigation”.

[I would point out again, he’s not being notified of a laptop, Toscas is notified of “emails”]

George Toscas “wanted to ensure information got to Andy“, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe…. so he called FBI Agent Peter Strzok…. who told George Toscas “we know”.

Peter Strzok then tells Bill Priestap.

Of course, Deputy Director Andrew McCabe already knew about the emails since September 28th, 2016, more than three weeks earlier.

In his Bret Baier interview FBI Director James Comey says this call is about a search warrant. There is no indication the call is actually about a search warrant. [Nor would there be a need for a search warrant if the call was actually about the emails that Wiener’s attorney dropped off on 9/21].

However, that phone call kicks off an internal debate about the previously closed Clinton email investigation; and Andrew McCabe sitting on the notification from New York for over three weeks – kicks off an internal FBI discussion about McCabe needing to recuse himself.

Now it’s October 27th, 2016, James Comey chief-of-staff Jim Rybicki wants McCabe to recuse himself. But Rybicki is alone on an island. Lisa Page is furious at such a suggestion, partly because she is McCabe’s legal counsel and if McCabe is recused so too is she.

At the same time as they are debating how to handle the Huma Abedin/Hillary Clinton emails, they are leaking to the media to frame a specific narrative.

Important to note here, that at no time is there any conversation -or hint of a conversation- that anyone is reviewing the content of the emails. The discussions don’t mention a single word about content… every scintilla of conversation is about how to handle the issues of the emails themselves. Actually, there’s not a single person mentioned in thousands of text messages that applies to an actual person who is looking at any content.

Quite simply: there is a glaringly transparent lack of an “investigation”.

Within this “tight group” at FBI, as Comey puts it, there is not a single mention of a person who is sitting somewhere looking through the reported “600,000” Clinton emails that was widely reported by media. There’s absolutely ZERO evidence of anyone looking at emails or scouring through laptop data…. and FBI Agent Peter Strzok has no staff under him who he discusses assigned to such a task…. and Strzok damned sure ain’t doing it. So what gives?

Moving on – Note to readers. Click the graphics and read the notes on them too:

It’s still October 27th, 2016, the day before James Comey announces his FBI decision to re-open the Clinton investigation. Jim Rybicki still saying McCabe should be recused from input; everyone else, including FBI Legal Counsel James Baker, is disagreeing with Rybicki and siding with Lisa Page.

Meanwhile the conversation has shifted slightly to “PC”, probable cause. Read:

While Lisa Page is leaking stories to Devlin Barrett (Wall Street Journal, now with the Washington Post), the internal discussion amid the “small group” is about probable cause.

The team is now saying if there was no probable cause when Comey closed the original email investigation in July 2016 (remember the very tight boundaries of review), then there’s no probable cause in October 2016 to reopen the investigation regardless of what the email content might be.

This appears to be how the “small group” or “tight team” justify doing nothing with the content received from New York. They received the emails September 28th and it’s now October 27th, and they haven’t even looked at it. Heck, they are debating if there’s even a need to look at it.

Then on October 28th, 2016, the FBI and Main Justice officials have a conference call about the entire Huma Abedin/Hillary Clinton email issue. Here’s where it gets interesting.

George Toscas and David Laufman from DOJ-NSD articulate a position that something needs to happen likely because Main Justice is concerned about the issue of FBI (McCabe) sitting on the emails for over three weeks without any feedback to SDNY (New York).

Thanks to Deputy Director McCabe, Main Justice in DC, specifically DOJ National Security Division, now looks like they are facilitating a cover-up operation being conducted by the FBI “small group”. [which is actually true, but they can’t let that be so glaringly obvious].

As a result of the Top-Tier officials conference call, Strzok is grumpy agent because his opinion appears to be insignificant. The decision is reached to announce the re-opening of the investigation. This sends Lisa Page bananas…

…In rapid response mode Lisa Page reaches out to Devlin Barrett, again to quickly shape the media coverage. Now that the world is aware of the need for a Clinton email investigation 2.0 the internal conversation returns to McCabe’s recusal.

Please note that at no time in the FBI is anyone directing an actual investigation of the content of the Clinton emails. Every single second of every effort is devoted to shaping the public perception of the need for the investigation. Every media outlet is being watched; every article is being read; and the entire apparatus of the small group is shaping coverage therein by contacting their leak outlets.

So let’s go back to that Comey interview:

♦What exactly would SDNY need a search warrant for?

♦Anthony Weiner’s lawyer has delivered SDNY actual emails. Why would he do that?

Now lets connect those questions to an earlier report.

According to ABC News Comey writes in “A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies and Leadership,” that he became the public face of the investigation partly because of a mysterious development which he felt could cast “serious doubt” on Lynch’s independence.

“Had it become public, the unverified material would undoubtedly have been used by political opponents to cast serious doubt on the attorney general’s independence in connection with the Clinton investigation,” Comey writes, according to ABC. He calls the material a “development still unknown to the American public to this day.” (ABC Link)

On page six of the IG report on Andrew McCabe (point number 4) we find a conference call between Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe and the FBI field office in New York where the subject of the Weiner/Abedin/Clinton email findings overlap with: the Clinton Foundation (CF) investigation; the Clinton Email investigation; pressure for Asst. Director McCabe to recuse himself, and Washington DC via Loretta Lynch using DOJ Main Justice leverage from the Eric Garner case against the NY FBI office and New York Police Department.

From the OIG report:

4. The Attorney General Expresses Strong Concerns to McCabe and other FBI Officials about Leaks, and McCabe Discusses Recusing Himself from CF Investigation (October 26, 2016)

McCabe told the OIG that during the October 2016 time frame, it was his “perception that there was a lot of information coming out of likely the [FBI’s] New York Field Office” that was ending up in the news. McCabe told the OIG that he “had some heated back-and-forths” with the New York Assistant Director in Charge (“NY-ADIC”) over the issue of media leaks.

On October 26th, 2016, McCabe and NY-ADIC participated in what McCabe described as “a hastily convened conference call with the Attorney General who delivered the same message to us” about leaks, with specific focus being on leaks regarding the high-profile investigation by FBI’s New York Field Office into the death of Eric Garner. McCabe told us that he “never heard her use more forceful language.” NY-ADIC confirmed that the participants got “ripped by the AG on leaks.”

According to NY-ADIC’s testimony and an e-mail he sent to himself on October 31, McCabe indicated to NY-ADIC and a then-FBI Executive Assistant Director (“EAD”) in a conversation after Attorney General Lynch disconnected from the call that McCabe was recusing himself from the CF Investigation.

(Page #6 and #7 – IG Report Link)

What makes this explosive is the timing, and what we now know about what was going on amid the FBI “small group” in DC.

On September 28th, 2016, Andrew McCabe was made aware of emails given to New York U.S. Attorney (SDNY) directly from Anthony Weiner’s lawyer. Again, the information relayed to DC is not about a Weiner laptop, it’s about actual emails delivered by Weiner’s lawyer. The laptop was evidence in the Weiner “sexting” case involving a minor; however, the laptop did, reportedly, also contained thousands of State Department documents from Hillary Clinton and her aide Huma Abedin, Weiner’s wife.

When Weiner’s lawyer walked into SDNY to deliver his leverage emails, Preet Bharara, a Clinton-Lynch ally, was the United States Attorney.

Again, look at the text messages between FBI Agent Peter Strzok (Inbox) and FBI Special Counsel to Andrew McCabe, Lisa Page (Outbox):

[The letter to “Congress” at the end of the text exchange relates to notification of the re-opening of the Clinton investigation – Actual date of notification 10/28/16]

According to later reporting, FBI Director James Comey was not notified of the emails until after October 21st, 2016. However, in late October and early November, there were reports from people with contacts in New York police and New York FBI, about Washington DOJ officials interfering with the Weiner investigation.

On the same date (October 26th, 2016) as the Lynch, McCabe and NY FBI phone call, former NY Mayor Rudy Giuilani was telling Fox News that an explosive development was forthcoming. Two days later, October 28th, 2016, Congress was notified of the additional Clinton emails.

However, a few more days later, November 4th, 2016, an even more explosive development as Erik Prince appeared on radio and outlined discoveries within the Huma Abedin/Anthony Weiner/Hillary Clinton email issues that was being blocked by AG Lynch.

Prince claimed he had insider knowledge of the investigation that could help explain why FBI Director James Comey had to announce he was reopening the investigation into Clinton’s email server last week.

“Because of Weinergate and the sexting scandal, the NYPD started investigating it. Through a subpoena, through a warrant, they searched his laptop, and sure enough, found those 650,000 emails. They found way more stuff than just more information pertaining to the inappropriate sexting the guy was doing,” Prince claimed.

“They found State Department emails. They found a lot of other really damning criminal information, including money laundering, including the fact that Hillary went to this sex island with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Bill Clinton went there more than 20 times. Hillary Clinton went there at least six times,” he said.

“The amount of garbage that they found in these emails, of criminal activity by Hillary, by her immediate circle, and even by other Democratic members of Congress was so disgusting they gave it to the FBI, and they said, ‘We’re going to go public with this if you don’t reopen the investigation and you don’t do the right thing with timely indictments,’” Prince explained.

“I believe – I know, and this is from a very well-placed source of mine at 1PP, One Police Plaza in New York – the NYPD wanted to do a press conference announcing the warrants and the additional arrests they were making in this investigation, and they’ve gotten huge pushback, to the point of coercion, from the Justice Department, with the Justice Department threatening to charge someone that had been unrelated in the accidental heart attack death of Eric Garner almost two years ago. That’s the level of pushback the Obama Justice Department is doing against actually seeking justice in the email and other related criminal matters,” Prince said. (Link)

An earlier Grand Jury in New York had refused to return an indictment against the NYPD in the Garner case. As an outcome of that grand jury finding, and as an outcome of their own investigation, the local FBI office and Eastern District of New York DOJ office was not trying to pursue criminal charges against the NYPD officers involved. This created a dispute because federal prosecutors (EDNY) and FBI officials in New York opposed bringing charges, while prosecutors with the Civil Rights Division at the Justice Department in Washington argued there was clear evidence to do so.

On October 25th, 2016, Loretta Lynch replaced the EDNY New York prosecutors:

New York Times (Oct. 25) – The Justice Department has replaced the New York team of agents and lawyers investigating the death of Eric Garner, officials said, a highly unusual shake-up that could jump-start the long-stalled case and put the government back on track to seek criminal charges.

With that move – on Oct. 25th, 2016, AG Lynch was now in position to threaten criminal prosecutions against the NYPD, and repercussions against the NY FBI and EDNY using the Garner case as leverage, just like Erik Prince outlined in the phone interview above.

Additionally, we see confirmation from the IG report, the Garner case was brought up in the next day (Oct 26, 2016) phone call to the NY FBI field office; just as Erik Prince outlined. Obviously Prince’s sources were close to the events as they unfolded.

The NY FBI and Eastern District of New York (EDNY) were threatened by Washington DC Main Justice and FBI, via Loretta Lynch and Andrew McCabe to drop the Clinton/Abedin/Weiner email investigation matters, or else the Garner DOJ Civil Rights Division would be used as leverage against the NYPD. And Loretta Lynch had SDNY U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara as the enforcer waiting for her call.

And so it was…

“Had it become public, the unverified material would undoubtedly have been used by political opponents to cast serious doubt on the attorney general’s independence in connection with the Clinton investigation,” Comey writes, according to ABC. He calls the material a “development still unknown to the American public to this day.” (ABC Link)

The emails Anthony Weiner’s lawyer brought to Preet Bharara was Weiner’s leverage to escape prosecution. Likely those emails were exactly as Eric Prince sources outlined. However, the SDNY responding to upper level leadership buried those emails.

In DC the FBI (Comey and McCabe) created the appearance of a re-opening of the Clinton investigation to keep control and ensure the investigative outcomes remained out of the hands of the Eastern District (EDNY) and New York FBI field office. They had no choice.

However, once the FBI opened the investigation October 28th, they did exactly the same thing they had done from September 28th to October 28th… they did nothing.

A few days later they declared the second investigation closed, and that was that.

They never expected her to lose.

Peter Strzok, the FBI’s lead Investigator in the Clinton email investigation, never intended to investigate the laptop before the election. The evidence, in his own words, is in the report by the Inspector General. In addition, the IG report includes a jaw dropping contradiction regarding the investigation of the laptop. Strzok says one thing; the FBI’s computer experts say another. It calls into question the entirety of the laptop investigation.

Reading Chapter 11 of the IG Report reinforces an acceptance that not only is there a need for a special counsel, but there is a brutally obvious need for multiple special counsels; each given a specific carve-out investigation that comes directly from the content of the Inspector General report. This issue of the handling of the Weiner/Abedin laptop screams for a special counsel investigation on that facet alone. Why?

Well, consider this from page #388 (emphasis mine):

Midyear agents obtained a copy of the Weiner laptop from NYO immediately after the search warrant was signed on October 30.

The laptop was taken directly to Quantico where the FBI’s Operational Technology Division (OTD) began processing the laptop. The Lead Analyst told us that given the volume of emails on the laptop and the difficulty with de-duplicating the emails that “at least for the first few days, the scale of what we’re doing seem[ed] really, really big.”

Strzok told us that OTD was able “to do some amazing things” to “rapidly de-duplicate” the emails on the laptop, which significantly lowered the number of emails that the Midyear team would have to individually review. Strzok stated that only after that technological breakthrough did he begin to think it was “possible we might wrap up before the election.” (pg 388)

The key takeaway here is two-fold. First, the laptop is in the custody of the FBI; that’s important moving forward (I’ll explain later). Also, specifically important, FBI Agent Peter Strzok, the lead investigative authority in the Hillary Clinton MYE (Mid-Year-Exam), is explaining to the IG how they were able to process an exhaustive volume of emails (350,000) and Blackberry communications (344,000) in a few days; [Oct 30 to Nov 5]

Note: “OTD was able “to do some amazing things to rapidly de-duplicate” the emails on the laptop.

OK, you got that?

Now lets look at the very next page, #389 (again, emphasis mine):

[…] The FBI determined that Abedin forwarded two of the confirmed classified emails to Weiner. The FBI reviewed 6,827 emails that were either to or from Clinton and assessed 3,077 of those emails to be “potentially work-related.”

The FBI analysis of the review noted that “[b]ecause metadata was largely absent, the emails could not be completely, automatically de-duplicated or evaluated against prior emails recovered during the investigation” and therefore the FBI could not determine how many of the potentially work-related emails were duplicative of emails previously obtained in the Midyear investigation. (pg 389)

See the problem? See the contradiction?

Strzok is saying due to some amazing wizardry the FBI forensics team was able to de-duplicate the emails. However, FBI forensics is saying they were NOT able to de-duplicate the emails.

Both of these statements cannot be true. And therein lies the underlying evidence to support a belief the laptop content was never actually reviewed. But it gets worse, much worse….

To show how it’s FBI Agent Peter Strzok that is lying; go back to chapter #9 and re-read what the New York case agent was saying about the content of the laptop.

The New York FBI analysis supports the FBI forensic statement in that no de-duplication was possible because the metadata was not consistent. The New York FBI Weiner case agent ran into this metadata issue when using extraction software on the laptop.

CHAPTER 9: The case agent assigned to the Weiner investigation was certified as a Digital Extraction Technician and, as such, had the training and skills to extract digital evidence from electronic devices.

The case agent told the OIG that he began processing Weiner’s devices upon receipt on September 26. The case agent stated that he noticed “within hours” that there were “over 300,000 emails on the laptop.”

The case agent told us that on either the evening of September 26 or the morning of September 27, he noticed the software program on his workstation was having trouble processing the data on the laptop. (pg 274)

The New York Case Agent then describes how inconsistent metadata within the computer files for the emails and Blackberry communications, made it impossible for successful extraction. The FBI NY case agent and the Quantico FBI forensics agent agree on the metadata issue and the inability to use their software programs for extraction and layered comparison for the purposes of de-duplication.

Both NY and Quantico contradict the statement to the IG by FBI Agent Peter Strzok. However, that contradiction, while presented in a factual assertion by the IG, is entirely overlooked and never reconciled within the inspector general report. That irreconcilable statement also sheds more sunlight on the motives of Strzok.

Next up, there were only three FBI people undertaking the October Clinton email review. To learn who they are we jump back to Chapter #11, page #389.

The Midyear team flagged all potentially work-related emails encountered during the review process and compared those to emails that they had previously reviewed in other datasets. Any work-related emails that were unique, meaning that they did not appear in any other dataset, were individually reviewed by the Lead Analyst, [Peter] Strzok, and FBI Attorney 1 [Tashina Gauhar] for evidentiary value. (pg 389)

Pete Strzok, Tash Gauhar and the formerly unknown lead analyst we now know to be Sally Moyer. That’s it. Three people.

This is the crew that created the “wizardry” that FBI Director James Comey says allowed him to tell congress with confidence that 1,355,980 electronic files (pg 389), containing 350,000 emails and 344,000 Blackberry communications were reviewed between October 30th and the morning of November 6th, 2016.

Three people.

Pete, Tash, and Sally the lead analyst. Uh huh.


The Inspector General just presents the facts; that’s obviously what he did. Then it’s up to FBI and DOJ leadership to accept the facts, interpret them, and apply their meaning.

No bias?

But FBI is committed to bias training?


There is an actual hero in all of this though. It’s that unnamed FBI Case Agent in New York who wouldn’t drop the laptop issue and forced the FBI in DC to take action on the laptop. Even the IG points this out (chapter #9, page 331):

We found that what changed between September 29 and October 27 that finally prompted the FBI to take action was not new information about what was on the Weiner laptop but rather the inquiries from the SDNY prosecutors and then from the Department. The only thing of significance that had changed was the calendar and the fact that people outside of the FBI were inquiring about the status of the Weiner laptop. (pg 331)

Those SDNY prosecutors only called Main Justice in DC because the New York case agent went in to see them and said he wasn’t going to be the scape goat for a buried investigation (chapter #9, pg 303) “The case agent told us that he scheduled a meeting on October 19 with the two SDNY AUSAs assigned to the Weiner investigation because he felt like he had nowhere else to turn.” … “The AUSAs both told us that the case agent appeared to be very stressed and worried that somehow he would be blamed in the end if no action was taken.”

On October 20, 2016, the AUSAs met with their supervisors at SDNY and informed them of their conversation with the Weiner case agent. The AUSAs stated that they told their supervisors the substantive information reported by the case agent, the case agent’s concerns that no one at the FBI had expressed interest in this information, and their concern that the case agent was stressed out and might act out in some way. (pg 304)

Why would the New York Case Agent be worried?

Consider Page 274, footnote #165:

fn 165: No electronic record exists of the case agent’s initial review of the Weiner laptop. The case agent told us that at some point in mid-October 2016 the NYO ASAC instructed the case agent to wipe his work station. The case agent explained that the ASAC was concerned about the presence of potentially classified information on the case agent’s work station, which was not authorized to process classified information.

The case agent told us that he followed the ASAC’s instructions, but that this request concerned him because the audit trail of his initial processing of the laptop would no longer be available. The case agent clarified that none of the evidence on the Weiner laptop was impacted by this, explaining that the FBI retained the Weiner laptop and only the image that had been copied onto his work station was deleted. The ASAC recalled that the case agent “worked through the security department to address the concern” of classified information on an unclassified system. He told us that he did not recall how the issue was resolved.


⇑ These Cannot Both Be True ⇓

This entry was posted in AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, Election 2020, FBI, IG Report Clinton Investigation, IG Report Comey, IG Report McCabe, media bias, Notorious Liars, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

340 Responses to Clinton Emails and FBI Activity Back in News as NY FBI Agent Talks – Fills-in CTH Background Research…

  1. jediphantom says:

    There is no doubt in my mind that the laptop of CARLOS DANGER contained BLACKMAIL MATERIALS collect by Epstein and Maxwell. What good is your EXTORTION TOOL if you can’t show them a clip of their compromised positions. But, it was basically illegal kiddie porn and therefore put anyone who had it on their devices is SERIOUS LEGAL TROUBLE.

    Thus the hammers, bleach-bitch, and MAGIC WIPING CLOTHS. Cankles and company raked in millions of dollars and others most likely used that BLACKMAIL MATERIAL to shape policy and get their agendas moved forward, through the selective use of them. EVIDENCE OF THAT IS EVERYWHERE.

    PEDOGATE and SPYGATE have the very same cast of criminal characters at the very center of this particular series of PRODUCTIONS. And the cover-ups which were deployed in order to protect their RACKET.

    Again, we await Justice.


    Liked by 6 people

  2. John Drake says:

    Due Diligence. The ‘Government’ has a rule that EVERY computer that gets CC’d on a CLASSIFIED e-mail that isn’t cleared for it gets WIPED…at least three passes (Except the NSA and other ‘three letter orgs’ which does at least seven passes).

    Then the recipients are ‘debriefed’…for the Originator, there are more ‘severe punishments’, unless of course they have ‘powerful friends’ or a ‘card’ in the BIG GAME.

    I think we all know what won’t happen here…



    • AustinHoldout says:

      So where is Weiner’s lawyer’s copy? Or Weiner’s lawyer’s testimony to the OIG or Congress about what he turned over? Or did he die as a result of a tragic accident?

      Liked by 5 people

      • The Demon Slick says:

        If we had all this exposed and prosecuted maybe we wouldn’t have people calling President Trump illegitimate. Maybe we wouldn’t have so much further corruption. Maybe the reputation of saint Obama would have been destroyed. Maybe this election would be a lot easier for President Trump to win. Maybe we wouldn’t be on the verge of a contested election with a split Supreme Court. Maybe civil war wouldn’t be hovering around on the horizon.

        Liked by 7 people

      • mikeyboo says:

        Maybe he turned over the laptop AND died as the result of a tragic accidnet.


      • Bugged says:

        Different time period, but related. I remember HRC original emails were given to her lawyer, Kendal or Kensington, on a thumb drive. An article around the time of the Bleach Bit explicitly said so.


  3. justlizzyp says:

    The involvement of Saint Preet reminds me of another thread – remember when folks from Ukraine were trying to get info to the DOJ and they said they handed it to someone and then never heard anything back? Am I remembering correctly? Seems like it was ‘some DOJ lawyer’ or ‘a US Attorney in New York’ or something that made me wonder if it was him at the time…..

    Liked by 7 people

  4. WhiteBoard says:

    Hillary created the Russia lie, in combination with Obama to cover her server, and his server

    according to Nunes (Senior Government Official – replacing obama’s email address)

    Liked by 3 people

  5. ElTocaor says:

    our good friend Sidney Powell:

    Liked by 16 people

    • regitiger says:

      powell is and has been fully jacked in.

      sidney powell:

      we invite you to review the assange briefing material. we believe you will be motivated to represent this client.


      Liked by 6 people

    • islandpalmtrees says:

      None government domain names were all over the place when it came to Obama and Hillary emails.

      Want the emails, send AG Barr over to the NSA Database with a list of these email addresses used by Obama and Hillary for communications.

      If AG Barr, can not find the email addresses then we can provide them?

      Liked by 1 person

      • islandpalmtrees says:

        Interesting selection
        In ancient Roman religion and myth, Janus is the god of beginnings, gates, transitions, time, duality, doorways, passages, frames, and endings. He is usually depicted as having two faces, since he looks to the future and to the past.


      • Cassandra says:

        Former head of the NSA, friend of General Flynn, has been working with Durham for a long time. Current head of the NSA and Trumps DNI head, Ratcliffe, are also working together. My comments are based on published articles. Sorry, no links.

        Liked by 1 person

  6. Bubba says:

    To this day is there any man out there who would have sex with the sexless tootsie roll legs kankles Ain’t no woman dumber than that pile of shit


  7. WhiteBoard says:

    GO BACK UP! and read Sundances Article

    find the number 389
    read that sentence above it!

    Reconcile that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (footnote 191)

    Yahoo hack shortly after

    Liked by 1 person

  8. republicanvet91 says:

    I admit I have not yet read the post, but I did read the news article yesterday, and my question is, why now?

    A book deal just doesn’t wash.


    • AustinHoldout says:

      Post is excellent. Take the time to read it.

      Liked by 1 person

      • republicanvet91 says:

        I did, and still have the same question, why now? Why is Robertson coming forward now?


        • maggie0987 says:

          Why is there no mention of the Paul Sperry tweets where he points out that this Weiner/Robertson info was all discussed in Aug 27, 2018, … way before this latest stuff from Devlin Barrett (!)
          See here –


        • My immediate reaction, before even reading the entire post above, was that this was Barrett whitewashing HIS part in all of this…”I was ‘woke’ but now I’m free”. As for “why now?”, well it’s the “night before Christmas (the November election)…(near) October Surprise time, traditionally…the spooks start coming out, for All Hollow’s Eve…know whut I mean, Ern (what I mean is, Barrett is a squirrel, and one limb of the nasty, Evil Thing we are faced with — and a criminal, of course, with all of them — and he is a squirrel getting antsy, with the coming dawn of a new regime (think the Pharaoh Akhnaton, “Living in Truth”, just before the fall of the New Kingdom in Egypt; the world has seen this all before). Got to get all the skeletons out, and the undead back into their coffins, before the Sun comes up and fries their ectoplasm. Where are Abbott and Costello when you need them? Because somebody needs to laugh at them, just as someone needs to imprison them, instead of everyone treating them like entitled politicians, instead of the low, mentally-twisted villains they are.

          It’s all due it being one BIG Insane Left, anti-Trump, anti-America cult, and all the little shards (individuals) of the one big, animating Evil are scurrying to hide, even if in plain sight (they can’t see…the truth…so they figure we can’t either).

          Mr. President, tear down this wall…


          • Apple1994 says:

            Our GREAT POTUS needs to crack open everything and let it rip! Gloves off!


          • Cassandra says:

            The President and his team HAVE been tearing down the wall of more accurately, pulling back the curtain, so WE the PEOPLE can see what’s really going on, WAKE UP and get motivated enough to create real change in our government and our lives. We are in a global war between the forces of good and evil. No general, no matter how brilliant, can defeat the forces of evil without an army. Btw prior to the first American Revolution the colonies went through what’s called the Great Awakening. Interestingly, President Trump began another Great Awakening movement, and he’s he used that phrase, back in 2017. Please FOCUS your time and energy on prayer and winning the election. 42 more days. If Democrats regain control there will be no more real elections. Ever.


  9. JG3 says:

    What would happen if Joe drops out and HRC is chosen to step-in/save’em all? Would it stop everything because it’s during election cycle?


  10. Skidroe says:

    Dem’s and the letter Agency’s have gotten away with 1000’s of murders( suicides). I am shocked that they get away with it. No wonder no one will come forward. We need a group that goes after them. We know who they are! It would be so neat if Scumbama, Hillary, Lynch, Comey, McCabe, Soros and many others all of a sudden committed suicide.

    Liked by 3 people

    • montanamel says:

      They are ALL known to be extremely bad shots…
      They will all take at least 2 or 3 rounds EACH to commit suicide….

      For a visual review of factors involved….

      I suggest viewing all three videos of JOHN WICK in one evening….

      IF that doesn’t put the smell of smokeless in your nose and make your ears ache, nothing ever will…

      Check 6

      Liked by 1 person

    • mikeyboo says:

      I’d settle for “disappeared and never heard from again.”

      Liked by 1 person

    • Apple1994 says:

      May I add Brenann, Holder and Weismann to that list? Scumbama is an entitled spoiled brat and coward, he would flee the country.


  11. Doppler says:

    So the “end of Summer” is tomorrow morning. Will there be a report from Durham?

    It seems that the Resistance is still running the DOJ FBI, and the highest imaginable crimes are being covered up for corrupt purposes.

    “Let justice come down like water, and righteousness like an ever flowing stream.”

    Or else the forces of darkness have suffocated our Republic

    Liked by 6 people

  12. republicanvet91 says:

    “yes, reported 15 in the news”

    How could this have been reported in the news unless what was found was leaked from the investigation of his laptop? I don’t recall the backstory on how this came about.

    Also, the FBI used news reports to bolster their FISA applications. Why didn’t these news reports give them urgency to investigate his laptop?

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Peter Gleason says:

    Shouldn’t these laptop emails be subject to (re-)FOIA??? I mean, they don’t reside where they are supposed to be, but they do exist, no?

    Liked by 2 people

    • jx says:

      A reason Clinton ran an illegal server is to thwart FOIA.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Perot Conservative says:

        Didn’t Cheney do the same thing?

        Liked by 1 person

        • jx says:

          I don’t know about Cheney. You might be thinking of Colin Powell. Clinton spoke with Powell who advised she keep it secret, as he did.

          Liked by 3 people

          • John Ringo says:

            Powell stated, and it’s been widely confirmed, that he never used personal email for classified communications.

            Many of Powell’s ‘personal emails’ were hacked and included in one of the leaks. He turned out to be an incredibly petty and bitchy person. But none of the emails included specifically classified information. Some ‘social/interactive’ intel that might be useful but no C intel.


  14. JG3 says:

    Wondering if the postponement of Assange’s trial, in London (due to CoVid?)/s is a chapter in this long and winding, tragic, tragic episode in our country’s history? SPIT!


  15. Right to reply says:

    Hillary like her husband, is a disgusting perverts! We should see the contents of that laptop. They make me sick! If you have money, you can get away with anything. That isn’t justice!

    Liked by 2 people

  16. dallasdan says:

    Nothing will come of this damning revelation. The leadership of the FBI and DOJ won’t permit it. We have learned that lesson countless times.


    • Cassandra says:

      Factually, the upper tier at the FBI/DO J went through the biggest purge in history. Long ago. The known Resistence players are gone. Referrals for CRIMINAL investigations were also made. Based on these facts your doomerism doesn’t make sense to me. I invite you to take Christ’s commands seriously. Fear not. Don’t let your heart be troubled. Every successful warrior realizes this is sound advice even if they’re not believers. President Trump believes in the POWER of Positive Thinking that’s translated into uplifting ACTIONS. We are in a life and death war. I urge you to be inspired by our courageous Commander in Chief rather than becoming a Tokyo Rose. Onward to victory in 42 days. Agreed?


  17. T2020 says:

    Anyone expecting another Clintoncide?

    Liked by 1 person

  18. joebkonobi says:

    what does one have to have to prove a conspiracy? More than enuf evidence for me. Barr will say its not enough to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. I say take it on and someone squeals. Nothing to lose, everything to gain. Reference Flynn, seems appropriate to threaten family, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander, or simply, and eye for an eye. Get busy Barr,

    Liked by 1 person

    • PVCDroid says:

      Guaranteed they are sitting on a mountain of evidence pointing to a massive coup conspiracy. Doubt we will ever see most of it. I’ll bet there are a few current or former agents that have spilled the beans with recordings, etc. Yet Crickets. I’d say the threats in DC happening right now regarding the above, the Supreme Court nomination and general TDS are getting ripe. Barr has to do something. His lack of action is overwhelming this country.

      Liked by 5 people

    • Cassandra says:

      AT Barr has been VERY busy. How do you not know this? Beyond that, Durham has been at work since the end of 2017. Additionally, he’s not the only prosecutor with a team. RICO cases typically take 3 years before indictments are unsealed and the court battles begin. Since these crimes involve deep rooted global criminal networks, the world’s rich, powerful and famous who are protected by all media and embedded domestic terrorist cells and government operatives/sleepers waiting to be activated I am not surprised or dismayed by the pace of things. On the contrary, I’m heartened especially because their have been no leaks and even supposed allies don’t really know what’s going on. That’s how legit and successful investigations/prosecutions operate. Please FOCUS on doing YOUR job. FOCUS on RED ie Removing Every Democrat on November 3 so the fight can continue. God bless us all.


  19. Perot Conservative says:

    What are the odds the laptop and any backups were nuked?

    OK, gossip time. It was always alleged that the Clintons may have had an “open” relationship, and further that Hillary was bi or gay.

    If there was evidence of this … why was Hillary going to notorious Pedo Island? … everything blows up. And Huma, who thinks Hillary is “gorgeous”?

    – the first female POTUS is toast
    – Trump becomes POTUS
    – IC gets audited
    – The Cljnton’s legacy is toast
    – Dems are tarnished
    – Weiner loses political future

    And what if there was $$$ laundering in it?

    Erik Prince sure has been quiet. What was his payback – more gov’t contracts?

    Liked by 1 person

  20. Right to reply says:

    Liked by 4 people

  21. rpcoastie says:

    IG Horowitz says there was no evidence of any political bias against Donald Trump by the SC but then cites this is his report:

    “In one Aug. 6, 2016, exchange, Page said, “Trump should go f himself.” Strzok responded, “F Trump.” Two days later, Page texted, “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” Strzok replied, “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.”
    Horowitz should be fired the morning after the election along with Wray and Gina Haspel!

    Liked by 6 people

  22. republicanvet91 says:

    “fact that people outside of the FBI were inquiring about the status of the Weiner laptop.”

    Very curious as to who those people were.

    Liked by 1 person

    • John Ringo says:

      There was a story in the Post back then about NYPD people asking about it since they’d apparently been the first to see the laptop and found classified emails on it.

      So the answer is ‘NYPD’.


  23. Patience says:

    So, all those emails were sent to Weiner’s laptop because, WHY?

    Liked by 1 person

    • jx says:

      And by what route?

      It was reported that Abedin sent Clinton’s official email through yahoo. Yahoo had an enormous breach – EVERY account was compromised.


  24. snowshooze says:

    I was yelling about this laptop until I got tired of yelling.
    I think everybody knew it was full of Clinton e-mails at the outset.

    Liked by 3 people

  25. snowshooze says:

    I was yelling about this laptop until I got tired of yelling.
    I think everybody knew it was full of Clinton e-mails at the outset.


  26. Strategery says:

    Well, this is all horrible.
    Outstanding research & presentation as usual.

    Liked by 3 people

  27. Lottacats says:

    I sure hope they do. I haven’t given up on Barr. He got a late start in all this and all hells been breaking loose on other fronts. He’s been busy. The crap is deep everywhere. I want indictments, heads to roll, perp walks yesterday but those who would escape that, I’ll be hoping for their lives to shatter completely as they’ve ruined others. Anyway let’s get this show on the road.
    Sundance has done a super duper job….as always. God Bless him.

    Liked by 4 people

  28. Ragle Gumm says:

    I think that this is the most salient point. The NYPD most likely has a backup of the laptop squirrelled away somewhere. DeBlasio just pissed off the entire NYPD. The NYPD endorses Trump. They love them. Ergo, Trump has got the backup.

    Bye-bye Nancy Pelosi!

    Liked by 4 people

    • KMD says:

      Which, of course ties into the ‘punishment’ being waged against the NYPD, via the ‘defund’ movement. The crooks want the honorable LEOs left, with firsthand info of the evil laptop, to simply tuck tail, retire, and ride off into the sunset. To be replaced by ‘puppets’ of their choosing…

      The whole ‘defund’ movement is playing the race card as an orchestrated attempt to clean house & stack the deck on the side of evil. Plain & simple…


  29. Strategery says:

    Call me foolish, but I still have one failsafe that I continue believe in.

    Liked by 4 people

  30. Dee says:

    My guess is when Rogers went to Trump tower he brings the review he did on the 702’s and they know what happened.. they may even have all the conversations.. when Flynn went to Holders law firm for lawyers.. doesn’t that seam strange.. maybe they already know what they all did and are just setting them up and letting the them all tell their story so Durham can arrest.. we have to have some hope.. it is strange that Trump is so calm and always tells us we got them all!! He even said about Obama.. I know something about Obama.. I will tell you some day… I think he knows everything…

    Liked by 2 people

  31. leavemygunsalone says:

    I attended a meeting tonight where Chris Farrell of Judicial Watch was the guest speaker. Someone asked him if anyone would be going to jail for any of this, and he said no. You could feel the air in the room sink. He did say that we need to be turning the tables and start using Rules for Radicals right back at them. He looks very different in real life from on the Tv. Here nor there, I hope he is wrong. I want justice.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Cassandra says:

      Chris knows NOTHING about what’s going so why on earth would anyone listen to his Doomer opinining? He as well as Fitton depend on donations from citizens who do not believe they can depend on President Trumps Team to succeed. Funding depends on spreading Doomerism. That being said, I appreciate what Chris and Fitton do. When they get out of their land I find them out. I invite you to do the same. Listen to President Trump and his team, including AG Barr for clues about what’s REALLY going on. Read official statements on the different government websites and watch official speeches and statements. Learn who to listen to and how to REALLY hear what’s being said. Learn to think for yourself and how to form your own opinions based on vetted primary sources. Learn to refrain from forming an opinion when you don’t know enough to do so. It’s OK not to know in fact it’s indicative of an open mind and intellectual maturity. God bless us all!


  32. Dee says:

    also General Paul Valley said in an interview that Trump didn’t trust any of the intel groups and set up a group of 800 of his own people off site.. tells me they may know what is going on at all times.. maybe they are just letting them all come out in the open… it does seam to run deep!!

    Liked by 3 people

  33. Dee says:

    this is really out there but didn’t Rogers go to work for some intel group in Isreal.. maybe that is the group of 800 people off site and maybe that is why we are getting peace.. something to think about… or hope about.. I think Trump knows …. he acts like he does… so I trust Trump and I don’t think you can try and take out a President and nothing is done about it.. so I have lots of hope…

    Liked by 2 people

    • Maquis says:

      Remember that intelligence hub initiated with Saudi Arabia that we learned of early on?
      With the Orb?
      The one with the capacity to circumvent and supplant our corrupted agencies?
      Could be significant.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Dana Christianson says:

      Does Anybody Really Think Ezra Cohen Watnick Was Just Some Random Guy? He Got The Job At The NSA Because Of Flynn. Seem’s Like Watnick Knew Just Where To Look And What To Look For. Then Alerted Rogers….


  34. JimFromNH2 says:

    On Thurs 9/17 FBI Director Wray claimed ‘white-supremacist’ ideology biggest part of violent extremism.
    With no evidence to back it up… Has he produced proof yet?
    Has the government asked for it?
    I’ll accept that Trump and Barr just bypassed that ridiculousness by declaring that funds could be withheld from newly violent cities complicit leadership.

    But I’d love to hear Ratcliffe come out and report that as DNI head, he’s still waiting for that info.
    Same for SCI Rubio, plus Grassly and Mitch.
    I’d love to hear conservative media ask Wray if he will RECANT that remark, until such verifiable data appears.
    Does Biden agree with that suggestion? Can somebody ask the Democrat candidate??
    That outrageous comment deserves to be killed off before October.
    If no proof is found.


  35. Very impressive analysis and insights. I’m just an interested onlooker from Australia but as a former lawyer I wish the USA well. The big questions are how to bring wrongdoers to justice and how to prevent such appalling behavior from repeating.

    Liked by 1 person

  36. AustinHoldout says:

    Lo and behold, we finally found one of Sean Hannity’s honest “rank and file” FBI agents, although he fell short of the courage to become a whistleblower.

    I read the description of Devlin Barrett’s book on Amazon and suffered the nausea so you don’t have to. Here it is in a nutshell: Hillary never committed any crimes. Comey and McCabe cared more about protecting their careers than the democratic process so they inserted themselves into the process at the most critical moment in election history (his words, I’m not exaggerating). Hillary would have won if they hadn’t done that.


  37. Teresa says:

    Remember the set up of IMF Strauss? Remember the murder of John Wheeler? The absolute corruption is ridiculous and the silence of so many is sickening. Our “elected leaders” fight harder to murder our children than they do to feed the hungry. We will all stand and be accounted for on that great judgment day so I pray for sinners and saints. Keep faith stay united for our battle is for riches not of this world.


  38. dow40kby2024 says:

    Special Counsel………. Yes it appears if there were an event/coverup to investigate this is the one. We need to demand an investigation.


    • Cassandra says:

      I respectfully disagree. What we need to do in the next 42 days is FOCUS exclusively on prayer and having an overwhelming election victory. If we don’t win then none of this matters. The real Saurons and Orcs will have won the global war between good and evil. There will be no more real elections ever again. Resistence will be as futile as Winstons efforts to resist Big Brother. #Prioritize #Survival


  39. 28angelica28 says:

    You identified the lead analyst as Sally Moyer yet in the IG report it stated that “The lead analyst told us that he recalled briefing Comey on November 4”. Was this diversionary or did it refer to someone other than Sally Moyer, like say Kevin Clinesmith?


    • 28angelica28 says:

      Could Clinesmith’s relationship in this to Sally Moyer have been his get-out-of-prison-for-a-long-time card to play? Loretta Lynch is being revealed as the Wicked Witch of DoJ, isn’t she?

      Liked by 1 person

  40. RickInHouston says:

    The Republican October Surprise list is growing longer:

    1. Weiner laptop.
    2. Assange sworn testimony.
    3. Mifsud testimony.
    4. Gislaine (sp) tapes.
    5. Hillary emails (the real ones. All of them.)
    6. Imran Awan scandal.
    7. Papadapoulous $10K marked bills connecting Brennan.

    I’m sure there are others.

    Liked by 2 people

  41. Bulldog84 says:

    Peter Strzok is in counterintelligence, right? Why would he be involved with Weiner’s laptop if all that was on it were Weiner’s dirty pics or texts? He’s just all over the place, isn’t he?

    Do not think for a minute that all that was on that laptop related to the Clintons just involved Epstein. The real dirt would be info on high-level money laundering (by foreign heads of state and others) being enabled by HRC’s state department — stuff that would make a friendship with Epstein look tame by comparison.


  42. Zy says:

    This falls under “old news, why are you bringing this up” excuse that the leftist propagandists like to use.

    The interesting part is the conflict of Barrett wanting fame and fortune and leftie pats on the back versus opening an old wound.


  43. tav144 says:

    An Epiphany of sorts….

    When POTUS says over and over, “We have it ALL” and “We caught them all”…. He is referring to the evidence found on the Weiner laptop. He has ALL the blackmail evidence they’ve been holding over folks….child porn, human trafficking, pedophilia, etc. They have it ALL. On ALL these folks and THAT is where a lot of these prosecutions on these crimes we’ve been seeing a lot of in the news lately have come from. I believe they are using that evidence to go after all these crooks.


  44. Doc Joe says:

    Strzok told the truth! The emails were “rapidly de-duplicate(d)” when the backup image on the NY case agents computer was wiped! Now the only copy is at the FBI.

    I wonder what the Weiner laptop and 21 special counsel mobile phones have in common?


  45. And all this to say that Comey re-opened the “investigation” in October 2016 in order to stop a real investigation that he could not control. The same playbook used by Mueller/Rosenstein in 2017. Use an investigation to stop other real investigations in order to protect yourself and your colleagues.

    But, it cannot and will not go on forever.

    “These will wage war against the Lamb, and the Lamb will overcome them, because He is Lord of lords and King of kings, and those who are with Him are the called and chosen and faithful.”

    Liked by 1 person

  46. minnesotamike55 says:

    Well! Bill Barr’s head must be spinning and spinning with too many important stopping points, he can’t decide where to start. Going back a bit I think Barr came into his position knowing there was problems in the DOJ that he wanted to fix. He held the notion that it was still generally a reputable institution. Based on his most recent comments, he now has a different opinion.

    I think Barr is overwhelmed with information that just disgusts him and can’t believe this is happening. He also knows there are many of his friends involved in many dirty deeds. He now has a problem with priorities. What is most important to fix and clean up? You can tell from his public comments that he is different than when he started. He has an attitude now. He’s not putting up with the bullshit anymore. He is determined but limited due to so much corruption, he can’t trust his organization. Thus, what appears to be slow walking is simply a small group trying to work within a totally corrupt system. He is trying to do everything within his context of how the DOJ should act, or rather, setting an example for when the shit hits the fan.

    I hope.

    Liked by 1 person

  47. MR52 says:

    Well it made me think of the Three Days of the Condor. It is funny that a look up of James Grady who wrote it was talking at Political and Prose. A Bookstore in DC, know for they liberal slant including Obama and Clinton. They are owned by ex-Washington Post People. I actually liked the movie because the story line is classic Clinton Arkancide. Little did we know it was ahead of its time. Only mistake in this movie’s is the ending. See the clip here. The last hero can be found in this clip. In real life, they are not the hero, but the enemy.

    Anyone have the script for Spygate?


  48. mtnforge says:

    Brilliant investigative work Mr. Sundance, so much thought and critical thinking.
    This evidence and this post combines to create The Rosette Stone of the clinton organized crime syndicate, the vast institutional treason and corruption they created and perpetuate thru conspiracy, and these sycophants who enable the clinton’s and their ilk to prosper, these higher power scalawags and their criminal culture, the high crimes they condone for their own accumulation of petty power and lucre, are intolerable, unacceptable, vile persons, to be cast out as wolves and treated as such.
    Stunning wonton malicious intentional selfish arrogance.

    And they run, to hide behind the very protections, which insidiously they bend and mutilate, both the color and the rule of law and constitutional imperatives, the very codes of our Republic they so arrogantly deny us.
    Let us show them our wrath without those protections they abuse so evilly.
    Let them see what it is like being denied those protections.
    They deserve nothing but punishment which wholly fits their crimes and full intent what they would intend in their contempt for us free from the moral restrictions and virtues we live by and honor so we can live in a civilized Republic based on the profound creation of Rule of Law, not rule of men.

    The question is not what crimes they are guilty of, but what crimes have they not committed in their lust for power and position, what rules of law have they not betrayed in the cold calculated betrayal of our trust, with their abuse of the positions of power granted them and paid for by dint of our sweat of creation of wealth and prosperity.
    Usurpers all who dissolve the glue which binds us in ordered liberty with their poison of the great sins of hate and envy. It permeates everything they do and are. They infest and lurk throughout or government, the real pandemic virus infecting our society.
    They rape and pillage the very foundations of our civilization.
    A class of savages and vandals in Brooks Brothers suits.


  49. AJ says:

    As I am reading through the comments, I remembered something from several years ago. Correct me if I am wrong, but I seem to recall that FBI agents were either reprimanded, fired, or charged with having porn on their computers.

    Am I remembering correctly that it was FBI or was it one of the other alphabet soup?

    It would be interesting to find that report/info and compare the time frame to this posts various time frames.


  50. Kenji says:

    And yet NOTHING has happened. Most of what I just read (thank you, SD) … were things I had already surmised just from the available evidence and statements at the time. i.e. NONE of the statements coming from the FBI made any LOGICAL sense whatsoever. But the FBI lied … continues to lie … and I continue to pay Peter Strozk’s salary, pension, and benefits.

    Here we are. The U freaking S of A … with the most powerful intelligence capability on the planet! The most egalitarian (right?) Nation on the planet … being held hostage by corrupt leftist political cops in the Justice Dept. and FBI (to mention only two agencies). Dirty cops, and dirty political blackmailers in charge of our country. Sick.

    I’m sorry … I just can’t read this stuff anymore. As Sidney Powell said in the clip above … like the police who read Weiner’s laptop mails … I want to go throw up. I have been waiting FOUR LONG YEARS … for PDJT to do something about all this systemic corruption. And after the sham Muh Russia investigation … which shackled MY President … I expected action. Perhaps it is forthcoming after his re-election … but I seriously doubt it. We will be told that revealing all the vile behavior and corruption on the laptop … would be too much for the American people to bear, and they would lose confidence in our venerated institutions. Retch … Dry Heave! Hurl.


    • Cassandra says:

      With all due respect, your definition of NOTHING seems totally disconnected from reality. Perhaps you need better sources of info or a better understanding of how successful operations happen? I’m retired and choose to spend 20/7/365 reading or listening to primary sources. I tune out opiners and speculators. I have been blown away since 2017 by all of the amazing SOMETHINGS happening each day on multiple fronts both here and around the world. Even for me it’s too much to keep up with. The level of strategic genius that’s been at play from day one is awe inspiring. I’m sorry you’ve missed out on everything so far. Instead of fretting and doom posting I invite you to focus instead on spreading hope and optimism as our POTUS is to those within your sphere of influence including strangers you encounter during the day. Find voters. Inspire them. #42Days Left #EveryVoteMatters #KAG2020

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s