FBI Never Investigated Abedin/Clinton Laptop Emails In October 2016…

As many people are aware, CTH has decided to go back through two years of documents, releases, reports, testimony, media interviews; including interviews with fired FBI Director James Comey; question all prior assumptions; re-examine the entire framework within all the known granular DOJ and FBI activity; and finally contrast it all against the full scope of released messaging between FBI Agent Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.

Within this project some breakout discoveries need to be highlighted. One of those discoveries pertains to the Fox News interview with James Comey and Bret Baier.

Within the interview Mr. Comey is questioned about the announcement of re-opening of the Hillary Clinton email investigation on October 28th, 2016.  In his response to why there was a delay between the FBI being notified by New York on September 28th, and waiting until October 28th, James Comey revealed a very important nugget.

The New York U.S. Attorney (SDNY) called Main Justice in DC to ask about why they were not receiving authority for a search warrant. We knew that call took place on October 21st, 2016.  Now we know “why” and who New York called at DOJ HQ.

Listen closely to James Comey at 06:06 to 07:30 of the interview (prompted):

Baier: “Did you know that Andrew McCabe, your deputy, had sat on that revelation about the emails”?

Comey: “Yeah, I don’t know that, I don’t know that to be the case. I do know that New York and FBI headquarters became aware that there may be some connection between Weiner’s laptop and the Clinton investigation, weeks before it was brought to me for decision – and as I write in the book I don’t know whether they could have moved faster and why the delay”

Baier: “Was it the threat that New York Agents were going to leak that it existed really what drove you to the ‘not conceal’ part?

Comey: “I don’t think so. I think what actually drove it was the prosecutors in New York who were working the criminal case against Weiner called down to headquarters and said ‘are we getting a search warrant or not for this’?  That caused, I’m sorry, Justice Department Headquarters, to then call across the street to the FBI and poke the organization; and they start to move much more quickly. I don’t know why there was, if there was slow activity, why it was slow for those first couple of weeks.”

There’s some really sketchy stuff going on in that answer. Why would SDNY need to get authorization for a search warrant from DC, if this is about Weiner’s laptop?  Yes, you could argue it pertains to a tightly held Clinton investigation run out of DC but the Weiner prosecution issues shouldn’t require approval from DC.

But let’s take Comey at face-value…. So there we discover it was justice officials within SDNY (Southern District of New York) who called Main Justice (DOJ in DC) and asked about a needed search warrant for “this”, presumably Weiner’s laptop by inference.  Now, let’s go look at the Page/Strzok description of what was going on.

Here are the messages from Lisa Page and Peter Strzok surrounding the original date that New York officials notified Washington DC FBI.  It’s important to note the two different entities: DOJ -vs- FBI.

According to the September 28, 2016, messages from FBI Agent Peter Strzok it was the SDNY in New York telling Andrew McCabe in DC about the issue.  Pay close attention to the convo:

(pdf source for all messages here)

Notice: “hundreds of thousands of emails turned over by Weiner’s attorney to SDNY”.

Pay super close attention.  This is not an outcome of a New York Police Dept. raid on Anthony Weiner.  This is Weiner’s attorney going to the U.S. attorney and voluntarily turning over emails. The emails were not turned over to the FBI in New York, the actual emails were turned over to the U.S. Attorney in the Southern District.

Key point here: Weiner’s attorneys turned over “emails”.  Actual “emails”.

♦If the U.S. Attorney in New York has the actual physical emails on September 28th, 2016, why would they need a search warrant on October 21st, 2016? (Comey’s call explanation)

♦Why would Weiner’s attorney be handing over evidence?

Think about this carefully.  I’ll get back to the importance of it later; but what I suspect is that Weiner had physical material that was his “insurance policy” against anything done to him by Hillary Clinton.  Facing a criminal prosecution Weiner’s lawyer went to the U.S. Attorney and attempted to exploit/leverage the content therein on his client’s behalf.

Fast forward three weeks, and we go back to FBI in DC.

On October 21, 2016, this is the call referenced by James Comey in the Bret Baier interview.  Someone from New York called “Main Justice” (the DOJ National Security Division in DC) and notified DOJ-NSD Deputy Asst. Attorney General George Toscas of the Huma Abedin/Hillary Clinton emails via the “weiner investigation”.

[I would point out again, he’s not being notified of a laptop, Toscas is notified of “emails”]

George Toscas “wanted to ensure information got to Andy“, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe…. so he called FBI Agent Peter Strzok…. who told George Toscas “we know”.

Peter Strzok then tells Bill Priestap.

Of course, Deputy Director Andrew McCabe already knew about the emails since September 28th, 2016, more than three weeks earlier.

In his Bret Baier interview FBI Director James Comey says this call is about a search warrant.  There is no indication the call is actually about a search warrant.  [Nor would there be a need for a search warrant if the call was actually about the emails that Wiener’s attorney dropped off on 9/21].

However, that phone call kicks off an internal debate about the previously closed Clinton email investigation; and Andrew McCabe sitting on the notification from New York for over three weeks – kicks off an internal FBI discussion about McCabe needing to recuse himself.

Now it’s October 27th, 2016, James Comey chief-of-staff Jim Rybicki wants McCabe to recuse himself.  But Rybicki is alone on an island. Lisa Page is furious at such a suggestion, partly because she is McCabe’s legal counsel and if McCabe is recused so too is she.

At the same time as they are debating how to handle the Huma Abedin/Hillary Clinton emails, they are leaking to the media to frame a specific narrative.

Important to note here, that at no time is there any conversation -or hint of a conversation- that anyone is reviewing the content of the emails.  The discussions don’t mention a single word about content… every scintilla of conversation is about how to handle the issues of the emails themselves.  Actually, there’s not a single person mentioned in thousands of text messages that applies to an actual person who is looking at any content.

Quite simply: there is a glaringly transparent lack of an “investigation”.

Within this “tight group” at FBI, as Comey puts it, there is not a single mention of a person who is sitting somewhere looking through the reported “600,000” Clinton emails that was widely reported by media.  There’s absolutely ZERO evidence of anyone looking at emails or scouring through laptop data…. and FBI Agent Peter Strzok has no staff under him who he discusses assigned to such a task…. and Strzok damned sure ain’t doing it.  So what gives?

Moving on – Note to readers. Click the graphics and read the notes on them too:

It’s still October 27th, 2016, the day before James Comey announces his FBI decision to re-open the Clinton investigation.  Jim Rybicki still saying McCabe should be recused from input; everyone else, including FBI Legal Counsel James Baker, is disagreeing with Rybicki and siding with Lisa Page.

Meanwhile the conversation has shifted slightly to “PC”, probable cause.  Read:

While Lisa Page is leaking stories to Devlin Barrett (Wall Street Journal), the internal discussion amid the “small group” is about probable cause.

The team is now saying if there was no probable cause when Comey closed the original email investigation in July 2016 (remember the very tight boundaries of review), then there’s no probable cause in October 2016 to reopen the investigation regardless of what the email content might be.

This appears to be how the “small group” or “tight team” justify doing nothing with the content received from New York.  They received the emails September 28th and it’s now October 27th, and they haven’t even looked at it.  Heck, they are debating if there’s even a need to look at it.

Then on October 28th, 2016, the FBI and Main Justice officials have a conference call about the entire Huma Abedin/Hillary Clinton email issue.  Here’s where it gets interesting.

George Toscas and David Laufman from DOJ-NSD articulate a position that something needs to happen likely because Main Justice is concerned about the issue of FBI (McCabe) sitting on the emails for over three weeks without any feedback to SDNY (New York).

Thanks to Deputy Director McCabe, Main Justice in DC, specifically DOJ National Security Division, now looks like they are facilitating a cover-up operation being conducted by the FBI “small group”.  [which is actually true, but they can’t let that be so glaringly obvious].

As a result of the Top-Tier officials conference call, Strzok is grumpy agent because his opinion appears to be insignificant.  The decision is reached to announce the re-opening of the investigation.  This sends Lisa Page bananas…

…In rapid response mode Lisa Page reaches out to Devlin Barrett, again to quickly shape the media coverage.  Now that the world is aware of the need for a Clinton email investigation 2.0 the internal conversation returns to McCabe’s recusal.

Please note that at no time in the FBI is anyone directing an actual investigation of the content of the Clinton emails.  Every single second of every effort is devoted to shaping the public perception of the need for the investigation.  Every media outlet is being watched; every article is being read; and the entire apparatus of the small group is shaping coverage therein by contacting their leak outlets.

So let’s go back to that Comey interview:

♦What exactly would SDNY need a search warrant for?

♦Anthony Weiner’s lawyer has delivered SDNY actual emails.  Why would he do that?

Now lets connect those questions to an earlier report.

According to ABC News Comey writes in “A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies and Leadership,” that he became the public face of the investigation partly because of a mysterious development which he felt could cast “serious doubt” on Lynch’s independence.

“Had it become public, the unverified material would undoubtedly have been used by political opponents to cast serious doubt on the attorney general’s independence in connection with the Clinton investigation,” Comey writes, according to ABC. He calls the material a “development still unknown to the American public to this day.” (ABC Link)

On page six of the IG report on Andrew McCabe (point number 4) we find a conference call between Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe and the FBI field office in New York where the subject of the Weiner/Abedin/Clinton email findings overlap with: the Clinton Foundation (CF) investigation; the Clinton Email investigation; pressure for Asst. Director McCabe to recuse himself, and Washington DC via Loretta Lynch using DOJ Main Justice leverage from the Eric Garner case against the NY FBI office and New York Police Department.

From the OIG report:

4. The Attorney General Expresses Strong Concerns to McCabe and other FBI Officials about Leaks, and McCabe Discusses Recusing Himself from CF Investigation (October 26, 2016)

McCabe told the OIG that during the October 2016 time frame, it was his “perception that there was a lot of information coming out of likely the [FBI’s] New York Field Office” that was ending up in the news. McCabe told the OIG that he “had some heated back-and-forths” with the New York Assistant Director in Charge (“NY-ADIC”) over the issue of media leaks.

On October 26th, 2016, McCabe and NY-ADIC participated in what McCabe described as “a hastily convened conference call with the Attorney General who delivered the same message to us” about leaks, with specific focus being on leaks regarding the high-profile investigation by FBI’s New York Field Office into the death of Eric Garner. McCabe told us that he “never heard her use more forceful language.” NY-ADIC confirmed that the participants got “ripped by the AG on leaks.”

According to NY-ADIC’s testimony and an e-mail he sent to himself on October 31, McCabe indicated to NY-ADIC and a then-FBI Executive Assistant Director (“EAD”) in a conversation after Attorney General Lynch disconnected from the call that McCabe was recusing himself from the CF Investigation.

(Page #6 and #7 – IG Report Link)

What makes this explosive is the timing, and what we now know about what was going on amid the FBI “small group” in DC.

On September 28th, 2016, Andrew McCabe was made aware of emails given to New York U.S. Attorney (SDNY) directly from Anthony Weiner’s lawyer.  Again, the information relayed to DC is not about a Weiner laptop, it’s about actual emails delivered by Weiner’s lawyer.  The laptop was evidence in the Weiner “sexting” case involving a minor; however, the laptop did, reportedly, also contained thousands of State Department documents from Hillary Clinton and her aide Huma Abedin, Weiner’s wife.

When Weiner’s lawyer walked into SDNY to deliver his leverage emails, Preet Bharara, a Clinton-Lynch ally, was the United States Attorney.

Again, look at the text messages between FBI Agent Peter Strzok (Inbox) and FBI Special Counsel to Andrew McCabe, Lisa Page (Outbox):

[The letter to “Congress” at the end of the text exchange relates to notification of the re-opening of the Clinton investigation – Actual date of notification 10/28/16]

According to later reporting, FBI Director James Comey was not notified of the emails until after October 21st, 2016.  However, in late October and early November, there were reports from people with contacts in New York police and New York FBI, about Washington DOJ officials interfering with the Weiner investigation.

On the same date (October 26th, 2016) as the Lynch, McCabe and NY FBI phone call, former NY Mayor Rudy Giuilani was telling Fox News that an explosive development was forthcoming.   Two days later, October 28th, 2016, Congress was notified of the additional Clinton emails.

However, a few more days later, November 4th, 2016, an even more explosive development as Erik Prince appeared on radio and outlined discoveries within the Huma Abedin/Anthony Weiner/Hillary Clinton email issues that was being blocked by AG Lynch.

Prince claimed he had insider knowledge of the investigation that could help explain why FBI Director James Comey had to announce he was reopening the investigation into Clinton’s email server last week.

“Because of Weinergate and the sexting scandal, the NYPD started investigating it. Through a subpoena, through a warrant, they searched his laptop, and sure enough, found those 650,000 emails. They found way more stuff than just more information pertaining to the inappropriate sexting the guy was doing,” Prince claimed.

“They found State Department emails. They found a lot of other really damning criminal information, including money laundering, including the fact that Hillary went to this sex island with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Bill Clinton went there more than 20 times. Hillary Clinton went there at least six times,” he said.

“The amount of garbage that they found in these emails, of criminal activity by Hillary, by her immediate circle, and even by other Democratic members of Congress was so disgusting they gave it to the FBI, and they said, ‘We’re going to go public with this if you don’t reopen the investigation and you don’t do the right thing with timely indictments,’” Prince explained.

“I believe – I know, and this is from a very well-placed source of mine at 1PP, One Police Plaza in New York – the NYPD wanted to do a press conference announcing the warrants and the additional arrests they were making in this investigation, and they’ve gotten huge pushback, to the point of coercion, from the Justice Department, with the Justice Department threatening to charge someone that had been unrelated in the accidental heart attack death of Eric Garner almost two years ago. That’s the level of pushback the Obama Justice Department is doing against actually seeking justice in the email and other related criminal matters,” Prince said. (Link)

An earlier Grand Jury in New York had refused to return an indictment against the NYPD in the Garner case.  As an outcome of that grand jury finding, and as an outcome of their own investigation, the local FBI office and Eastern District of New York DOJ office was not trying to pursue criminal charges against the NYPD officers involved.  This created a dispute because federal prosecutors (EDNY) and FBI officials in New York opposed bringing charges, while prosecutors with the Civil Rights Division at the Justice Department in Washington argued there was clear evidence to do so.

On October 25th, 2016, Loretta Lynch replaced the EDNY New York prosecutors:

New York Times (Oct. 25)  – The Justice Department has replaced the New York team of agents and lawyers investigating the death of Eric Garner, officials said, a highly unusual shake-up that could jump-start the long-stalled case and put the government back on track to seek criminal charges.

With that move – on Oct. 25th, 2016, AG Lynch was now in position to threaten criminal prosecutions against the NYPD, and repercussions against the NY FBI and EDNY using the Garner case as leverage, just like Erik Prince outlined in the phone interview above.

Additionally, we see confirmation from the IG report, the Garner case was brought up in the next day (Oct 26, 2016) phone call to the NY FBI field office; just as Erik Prince outlined.  Obviously Prince’s sources were close to the events as they unfolded.

The NY FBI and Eastern District of New York (EDNY) were threatened by Washington DC Main Justice and FBI, via Loretta Lynch and Andrew McCabe to drop the Clinton/Abedin/Weiner email investigation matters, or else the Garner DOJ Civil Rights Division would be used as leverage against the NYPD.  And Loretta Lynch had SDNY U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara as the enforcer waiting for her call.

And so it was…

“Had it become public, the unverified material would undoubtedly have been used by political opponents to cast serious doubt on the attorney general’s independence in connection with the Clinton investigation,” Comey writes, according to ABC. He calls the material a “development still unknown to the American public to this day.” (ABC Link)

The emails Anthony Weiner’s lawyer brought to Preet Bharara was Weiner’s leverage to escape prosecution.  Likely those emails were exactly as Eric Prince sources outlined.  However, the SDNY responding to upper level leadership buried those emails.

In DC the FBI (Comey and McCabe) created the appearance of a re-opening of the Clinton investigation to keep control and ensure the investigative outcomes remained out of the hands of the Eastern District (EDNY) and New York FBI field office.  They had no choice.

However, once the FBI opened the investigation October 28th, they did exactly the same thing they had done from September 28th to October 28th… they did nothing.

A few days later they declared the second investigation closed, and that was that.

They never expected her to lose.

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2018, FBI, media bias, New York, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

802 Responses to FBI Never Investigated Abedin/Clinton Laptop Emails In October 2016…

  1. Phil Garber says:

    So there is no evidence from the texts that the FBI actually examined that final batch of emails. That raises the question: Did the FBI even take possession or gain access to those emails? After all, they were given directly to SDNY, not the FBI; McCabe was notified, then he sat on the notification (not the emails) for almost a month; then in the final week before the election they were engaged in perception management presumably in conjunction with DOJ, which had the emails but likewise did not want or expect a real investigation of them.

    So I would not be surprised if a review of the custody chain of the emails from Weiner’s computer were to show that they never left DOJ main. If that is the case, then there is the smoking gun to show that no investigation of those emails was ever intended by FBI leadership.

    Liked by 4 people

  2. RJones says:

    This article clarifies perhaps why Mueller was investing Eric Prince meetings in the Seychelles. He knows too much and needs to be corralled…

    Liked by 11 people

  3. Gary says:


    Liked by 3 people

    • Conservativeinny says:

      Yes, Southern District of NY and EDNY is the Eastern District of NY. Both are Federal

      Liked by 3 people

      • Roberto says:

        Eastern District is Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island and Long Island. Southern District is Manhattan, Bronx and Westchester. The usual competition between the two has to do with prosecution of Cosa Nostra cases which almost always span both districts. The competitive history was already there.

        Liked by 1 person

  4. Amy Musick says:

    Thank you Mr. Sundance! My head is spinning, but knowledge is power! And thank you to whoever referenced your site back on 3/30/18 at Sara A. Carter. The explanation that Strzok, Page et al were cooperating answered my “why are they still employed?” question and brought me some peace (briefly!).

    The Deep Timeline https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cialWWJ907vV3b9HPS2lhEspZh0WoPHqixUuKed_hFI/htmlview also helpful!

    Liked by 7 people

  5. Paco Loco says:

    If the DoJ/FBI were a Fortune 500 corporation, and executive fraud, collusion and malfeasance of the type we see in Obamagate were committed, and the crimes exposed to the shareholders, the CEO and his executive team would have been sacked and then criminally prosecuted in short order. Think WorldCom or ENRON. What the hell is taking so long for Sessions to press charges, reveal to the public the details of this unprecedented scandal, and bring the perps to justice? Time is of the essence.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Tparty says:

      The answer to your question is hinted at in their communications regarding how and the status of specifically ‘who’ provided the additional emails. They used the terms 18 and 15 as a personal pronoun for Weiners attorney … ‘was he an 18?’ , ‘no in the news as 15’.

      These likely refer to GS rank which was obviously important in the stovepipe control of of many things .gov including but not limited to suppression of investigations and embarrassing revelations, giving out no bid contracts to outsource to private transnational corporations that affect national security, military training, the US Patent office, management of data/websites including Obamcare website, US Visa office, Airport Traffic Control, Private Prisons(thanks Jeff Sessions) and approve Uranium deals(again Sessions involved).
      So how does one become ‘an 18’ and are politicians allowed in the 18 club? You go to a ‘special’ finishing school for the Senior Executive Service and yes politcians are allowed but only a certain percentage. They are represented by a union which tells them what to do and are compensated to an emabarassing degree. These are the shadow government and many have been laboring to mine the actual government plumb books for exactly who these people are. It’s available in a searchable form now along with a very detailed ‘crime line’. They appear at every important and necessary time to control, suppress and allow rent seeking to transnational corporations … and YES, Jeff Sessions is a member of the S.E.S. attained during his stint before politics. Jeff Sessions sat on 3 committees which where required to sign off on the Uranium One deal.

      So how do we fight back against this shadow government praetorian guard protecting this transnational corporate deep state? The Holman Rule …ironically passed in the last Omnibus Spending Bill. Under this rule the President can change the compensation of any S.E.S. member to $1 annually …
      The view from 35,000 feet.

      Anyone ever heard of a golden share?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Tparty says:

        When we search the plumb books virtually everyone connected to this shadow government effort to discredit and depose POTUS is a member of the S.E.S. They have their own union, their own school, their own higher loyalty and their own symbol, the keystone inscribed with a column … the fifth column.


      • Stephen J Britt says:

        I believe “15” and “18” might refer to the victim’s age in the Weiner case. When I was at DOJ grade GS-16 was the top grade before the Senior Executive Service levels kicked in…

        Liked by 1 person

    • Landie Landie says:

      Trust Sessions, silent but deadly…consider what is going on behind the MSM on
      the Q anon “crumb” board and this Reddit post:

      Put this “crumb” with this CTH article you just read and then the Reddit Post at the end of of this comment by me bottom of the comment. Keep reading down, it will come together like a loaf.

      Here is the “crumb” drop mao archive: Qanon.pub

      Here is the particular “crumb”:

      Apr 27 2018 19:27:33 (EST) Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 6e1ca8 1215845
      Cohen raid by FBI?
      Public context: re: payment to Stormy Daniels?
      SC & FBI raided POTUS’ attorney to pull Stormy Daniels payment info?
      RR signed off?
      What other docs were collected?
      How many places raided?
      Raid on the President of the United States’ attorney for payment details re: private case re: Stormy Daniels?
      Think logically.
      How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)?
      Who has everything?
      Methods which info collected/ obtained?
      Admissible in the court of law?
      Insert Rudy.
      First public statement.
      “It shouldn’t take more than “a week or two” to come to a resolution on the probe.”
      Think resignations.
      Who has the POWER?
      If POTUS was in a weakened position (about to be impeached/indicted) would ‘they’ resign?
      Why are we here?
      Public forum.
      World watching.
      Sharing of intel to bad actors?
      Not confirming SC is on /team/.
      Question everything.
      Timing important.

      Here is the Reddit post:

      HMMMM? ThanQs Q

      Liked by 1 person

      • Landie Landie says:

        here is the Q anon “crumb” map abbreviations to read the map:

        Youtube has many anons uploading videos re: each topic, search and see/hear all the way back to Oct. 2017 crumbs


        • Landie Landie says:


          Look everyday.

          Ggo down to Oct 2017 bottom of the Q “crumb” map and re: think the news you see, pay attention to the DATES, Q is weeks if not months ahead……many PROOFS of real……and read from the bottom to the top, see how Trump admin is bypassing the MSM…….#Qanon IS THE REAL NEWS……..only anons have to do the reporting, find it for ourselves, not false narrative when you see it with your own eyes and no tampering. Shocking stuff. Trump is draining the swamp, Q anons prove this every day.


  6. brenrod says:

    as nothing has moved forward on the 650.000 weiner emails we should assume that the fix is still in and everything is still being gagged and controlled. I think page and strok is a red herring to distract from the real stuff… making it a childish game of leaking rather than the massive criminal expose in the emails that probably can put a lot of folks in jail. I think they want us to keep looking at the bs strok and page stories so we ask no questions as to why nypd and doj are still not proceeding on the weiner 650000 emails obtained through supbeana and warrant….and not the small batch of controlled emails “given” to nysd by weiner attorney. The real story is dead.

    Liked by 3 people

  7. Rex70 says:

    I’m going to agree that there are copies of the Huma-Weiner laptop and that various copies in various locations exist; to have just a copy in just one location would be foolishness that a individuals in the NYPD who first confiscated the laptop would not exhibit. I agree with the posters here that a copy of it was the #1 item the corrupt FBI at the behest of the corrupt Mueller SC was searching for—as well as some leverage over Cohen to inquire “who else” may have a copy. I say Mr. Assange has one—hence his total disgust of HRC and his many comments saying so, the 400-pound genius in his underwear—the Kim Dotcom who currently resides in New Zealand and has offered multiple times to testify BEFORE CONGRESS in Mueller’s sham investigation, and others in the literal four corners of the world. No one who wisely made copies of the laptop’s contents would foolishly have only one copy and/or hid them them in just one part of this small world. The FBI’s jurisdiction ends at our borders—correct?

    Liked by 2 people

  8. youme says:

    The warrant to search Weiner’s laptop is dated 10-30-2016


    On 10-28-2016 the Washington Post reports the following:

    Newly discovered emails found on a computer seized during an investigation of disgraced former congressman Anthony Weiner thrust the controversy over Hillary Clinton’s use of a private server back into the presidential campaign less than two weeks before the election.

    Officials said the discovery prompted a surprise announcement Friday by FBI Director James B. Comey that the agency would once again be examining emails related to Clinton’s time as secretary of state.

    In a letter to lawmakers, Comey said the FBI would take “appropriate investigative steps” to determine whether the newly discovered emails contain classified information and to assess whether they are relevant to the Clinton server probe.

    The emails, numbering more than 1,000, were found on a computer used by both Weiner (D-N.Y.) and his wife, top Clinton aide Huma Abedin, according to law enforcement officials with knowledge of the inquiry who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

    The correspondence included emails between Abedin and Clinton, according to a law enforcement official.



  9. Clara says:

    Sundance, I apologize because I’ve read your excellent report but don’t have time right now to read all the comments. So someone else may have already said this, but I don’t think your timeline is completely correct. I specifically remember Comey stating that the top secret thing that Loretta did that left her completely compromised and “forced” Comey to swoop in and single-handedly rescue the reputations of the DOJ and FBI was something she did much earlier, I believe in early 2016. So, while I do not doubt that she continued to compromise the investigation at every turn throughout 2016, I don’t think Comey is referring to this late Oct. 2016 conference call in which she threatened the NYPD when he speaks of this top secret thing that no one can know about for the next 25 years or whatever.

    Also, the other thing that does not add to me is why, now that Lynch is gone and presumably no longer able to threaten them, the NYPD has not divulged what they knew about the Weiner emails. Particularly if the material found there was as explosive as some have suggested, I find it very hard to believe that everyone who knew about took a vow of silence for the rest of their lives.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. littleanniesfannie says:

    Hats off to you Sundance! I read your post twice just to be clear. Your insight and wisdom are absolutely amazing. I would love to have 1% of your analysis skill!!
    Had I been a science fiction writer, I never in my wildest dreams could have developed this plot. This movie will make All The President’s Men look like some kind of kiddie story!

    Liked by 2 people

  11. Ospreyzone says:

    Excellent work indeed, Sundance. To have this complex, malodorous scheme laid out for us in such a cogent manner each day is truly astonishing and in sharp contrast to the pabulum that passes for news on most sites. Your hard work is very much appreciated, at least by this reader.

    Now, if one were to jump from the treehouse into, let’s say a small airplane, ascend a few thousand feet and look down, one might be compelled to surmise the following:
    – The head of the FBI and his deputy conspired to influence our national election and undermine a freely elected President of the United States.
    – The head of the DOJ and her deputy conspired to influence our national election and undermine a freely elected President of the United States.
    – The head of the CIA conspired to influence our national election and undermine a freely elected President of the United States, and continues to threaten POTUS vis-à-vis Special Counsel.
    – The Director of National Intelligence conspired to influence our national election and undermine a freely elected President of the United States.

    It really doesn’t sound too good, does it? Yet, there is ample evidence for each of these points and much of that is now public record. It appears, Virginia, that there really is a permanent state.

    Back in the 1880s great lawmen like Wyatt Earp, Pat Garrett, and Bat Masterson (White Hats all) would hunt down criminals of every stripe, kill them where they stood or drag them back for a proper “hanging judge” to serve up swift justice. It was a pretty efficient system, considering.

    Today, despite all of the evidence piled high to suggest that the points above are true; not one, – not even one – ‘black hat’ has seen their day in court or even been indicted. What are we to think, but that there now really is a two-tiered system of justice? I fear the blindfold has finally slipped away from Lady Liberty’s eyes, and her callous gaze is directed right at us. …And that should make everyone very afraid.

    Liked by 3 people

  12. So whats to stop the NYPD from leaking the e-mail information now? Lych is no longer in charge as main justice. Why don’t they come forward with the information now?


  13. Jeff Werner says:

    These corrupt officials are trying to run the clock out so that the House and Senate (if Dems win) would crush these investigations. Sessions is helping them to slow-walk everything. Only way criminals, to include Obama, Jarrett, Biden, et al will hang is if Republicans maintain control of the House and Senate……will be hard to do. Here’s hoping.


    • Louis Genevie says:

      The GOP will lose the House UNLESS the Patriots among us take action: each of us must find three people we can trust who are not currently registered to vote, get them registered and get them to the polls in November. We MUST NOT lose control of the House.


  14. ADDgolfer says:

    TY Sundance, this is top tier investigative research. As always, the added bonus of how you explain the anaysis.
    It’s plausible, verifiable and one of many likely reasons the FBI did what they did and didn’t do, pertaining to Clinton in 2016

    Right now, here in 2018 it’d pretty much just a matter of embarrassed shame to admit criminal wrongdoing by top FBI leadership and move on. Well that and…
    Those still powerful people in the shadows, not wanting to lose any more power and leverage that’s taken years to cultivate.
    Like Trump’s election, an unplanned, unfortunate agenda speed bump, albeit more of a pesky bump than thought.
    They have faith in the massive machine they built to power through anything in their way. It’s worked for them before and they’ve recently made it even stronger, but…
    The machine’s latest upgrades is built on an unstable platform and now there are cracks.
    The MSM upgrades working with the most recent programmed youth generations, may be strong enough to hold it together to buy time, but yet to be seen.

    Rest assure state of the art think tanks are working 24/7, markers are being called, to eradicate this mess they have found themselves in.
    Powerbrokers admitting behind closed doors of the DOJ, criminal wrongdoing of others. Arguing what, who and how much to roll out to minimize the damage, both to the country and themselves as well as interest of those they secretly represent.

    There is indeed a storm of unprecedented size building. Many may be disappointed in how much light was strong enough to shine on events during and between squalls, and how bright or dim it is afterwards?


  15. Bendix says:

    When Comey makes remarks about “phoning across the street” etc. I think he’s just trying to show us how much of an insider he is and we aren’t. Like government doesn’t belong to We The People as much as it belongs to some fraternity we aren’t members of.
    I also an reminded of the way habitual liars throw in irrelevant details to make their stories more authentic-sounding.

    Liked by 4 people

  16. Donna in Oregon says:

    Will be looking for this in the OIG report. This pertains to Loretta Lynch, DNC, DWS, Open Societies VP for Russia, and the Clinton emails.

    “Senate Judiciary sends letters to find out if Loretta Lynch tried to interfere with Clinton email investigation”
    by Kelly Cohen June 23, 2017 12:44 PM

    Liked by 2 people

  17. Clara says:

    Here is the clip of Comey referring to material involving Loretta Lynch that came to the FBI’s attention in “early 2016” that he claims would have created a public perception of Lynch being compromised. He tells Stephanopolus that the FBI investigated it, did not believe it to be true, but nonetheless felt it could create a public perception of Lynch being compromised (thus, his need to swoop in and save the day).

    So, the conference call with the NY field office in Oct. 2016 clearly was not what Comey was referring to as the catalyst for him to, in effect, take over the Justice Dept.

    Liked by 1 person

    • CopperTop says:

      Clara. Good support to your complication. I think this is merely just strike 1, tarmac 2, and Comey’s knowledge of the SDNY pressure as the ‘unmentioned in book’ but ferreted out here by SD as strike 3 to her credibility. WE can assume earlier…there would be some sort of advice given to Clinton Campaign that was innocent seeming but was intended to tank Bernie or be a qpquo on getting a judge appointment from HRC.


  18. Bendix says:

    Back to Anthony Weiner, no he didn’t get a light sentence he got nearly two years in an actual prison. That’s an unusually stiff sentence, pun intended.
    It also has nothing to do with the emails being discussed as ‘insurance’.
    I kind of doubt he would actually label it that way, but anything is possible.
    I’m thinking now that someone knows all about Anthony’s potential insurance, and sends a teenager his way. They know his weakness, and so far they haven’t had much success with their other attempts at entrapment.
    The “busty brunette” scandal fell flat.
    Since you can’t get a man in legal hot water for consensual sexting with adults, they turn to the ‘minor’ tactic. But they foresee Anthony being able to beat the rap if they use a fake girl, so they get a real one.
    I’m thinking this is related to custody of his son.
    With Anthony out of the way, if Huma goes to jail, where does that leave the boy?
    Potentially with Huma’s family.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. colkurtzblog says:

    Aside from the emails from Weiners laptop, what was that comment about the “sex Island “ that Bill/Hillary visited and other Democrats from Congress?

    Erik Princes revelations seemed to pan out in this article yet that sex Island thing fizzled. It would seem to me that sort of revelation would be a HUGE embarrassment for all of them and a prime motivator for it to get buried.


  20. “So let’s go back to that Comey interview:

    ♦What exactly would SDNY need a search warrant for?

    ♦Anthony Weiner’s lawyer has delivered SDNY actual emails. Why would he do that?”

    My guess is that the USAO/SDNY needed to search the computer for evidence relating to their case, the abuse of a minor prosecution. USAO/SDNY was not investigating Clinton. The e-mails, however salacious, were evidence of misconduct by Ms. Clinton and Ms. Abedin, not Weiner. They would be of interest to DOJ, but likely did not harm Weiner in any real way, and defense counsel was playing the card for whatever good it would do him, with no downside. Good headwork by the defender.

    Maybe deja vu, but I recall writing that the bogus “reopening” of the Clinton e-mail inquiry was damage control; it was forced by threats by the NYPD (or FBI NYC Field Office?) to leak much worse material on the computer if DOJ/FBI tried a Clinton coverup. The really salacious stuff was Huma’s “insurance policy.”

    S.J. Britt
    AUSA/EDPA (retired)

    Liked by 3 people

  21. Bendix says:

    Here’s something else that is stoking my anger.
    At the time President Trump took office, I was one of the people hoping he would keep Preet on.
    Truth be told, I had some misgivings about the man, but after he took on the prosecution of Sheldon Silver, something I never thought I’d see, I quashed any suspicions I had about him.
    It isn’t as if there was an alternative.
    That does not excuse my letting my guard down, though.
    I hate these people for making me the way I am now.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Bendix- don’t feel bad. Many of us in NY at one time had a lot of faith in Preet, especially because of what he did with Silver. You want to get a better idea of what the SDNY is like, check out Chuck Rhodes in the series “Billions.” Not so far removed from reality.


  22. Lolita DICKINSON says:

    Great article. If most journalists and so call major news organizations were really interested in been a honest voice of the free press they would be all over this.

    Liked by 1 person

  23. MBB says:

    I’m new to this site. Who is Sundance?


  24. Bendix says:

    Here is some discussion of the intricacies and oddities surrounding the Weiner case.
    This article is not sympathetic to Weiner, it’s one point of view.
    A lot of people think there is something unusual about the way this was handled, with different ideas about why this should be so.
    I myself think the reason Anthony was prosecuted under federal law and then given a lesser sentence than could have been given was to scare him into accepting the deal without discussion.
    Sort of a “look what we can do to you, don’t make waves” thing.
    It was very important to someone that Anthony not kick about this. Why?

    Liked by 1 person

  25. Bendix says:

    This one attempts to make Hillary the victim in the Weiner sexting case, which is absurd, but I’m not convinced Hillary had nothing to do with it:
    The article does outline the sketchiness of the whole episode, including the part I have maintained, that adults appear to have put the girl in question up to it.
    There’s another theory out there that links Anthony to the Russians nonsense, but it is still another voice that believes Anthony was catfished.


  26. zonefree says:

    Regarding the search warrant. Comey is very confused in his testimony May 2. From the CSPAN video from 37:00 – 42:00.

    COMEY: And so they came in and said, we can see thousands of emails from the Clinton email domain, including many, many, many from the Verizon Clinton domain, BlackBerry domain. They said we think we got to get a search warrant to go get these, and the Department of Justice agreed we had to go get a search warrant.
    So I agreed, I authorized them to seek a search warrant.
    COMEY: And so they came in and said, we can see thousands of emails from the Clinton email domain, including many, many, many from the Verizon Clinton domain, BlackBerry domain. They said we think we got to get a search warrant to go get these, and the Department of Justice agreed we had to go get a search warrant.
    So I agreed, I authorized them to seek a search warrant…..

    CLIP here. – [Comey is feeling nauseous again.]

    FEINSTEIN: Well, let me respond. On the letter, it was just a matter of minutes before the world knew about it. Secondly, my understanding — and staff has just said to me — that you didn’t get a search warrant before making the announcement.

    COMEY: I think that’s right. I think I authorized and the Department of Justice agreed we were going to seek a search warrant. I actually don’t see it as a meaningful distinction


    Liked by 2 people

  27. David R. Graham says:

    And Hussein Obama was not keeping tabs on all of this as it went down, did not have a staffer ready to pounce if anything got above Lynch, Clapper or Brennan, and does not still strike cold terror in their hearts?

    They all fear HRC’s deep alcoholic temper and history of violence, thus wanting to look like they helped her win, thinking they had done that and she would see it and thank them. But what is it they fear from Hussein Obama? And why still? It would have to be something violent, I think. And savage. And how would he be in a position to threaten that? I cannot imagine those snakes being so in love with their charmer as to require no credible threats, added to melodies, to keep their teeth retracted.

    Is anyone in D.C. investigating the Salafi/Shiite Jihad’s broad-spectrum operation against the USA? Is everyone there consumed by this essentially Peyton Place/Country Club/Oligarchs’ cantankerous trailer park life of dogs? Where is the public service in these lowlives? Who cares about their ambitions and clevernesses? Who should care? Has anyone thought of late what USA national sovereignty means and wanted it?

    Liked by 1 person

  28. Wayne Robinson says:

    Everything about FBI is as diappointing as the lie of Putin they are the same two faced lying pieces of filth / FBI NEEDS TO BE DECERTIFIED DEFUNDED and put in dust bin of history / trying to overthrow America for a Marxist dictatorship is exactly what they wanted . No bill of rights except for party litalist .

    Liked by 2 people

  29. TwoLaine says:

    Comey said he briefed the Gang of 8 on the dossier. WHAT did he tell them? The same as what he told the President? The p-p crap? Why would he tell them more than he told the President?


  30. Rob Smith says:

    So the debate was about recusal from the non-investigation.


  31. Jane Smith says:

    So, the question is…Is any of what was done actually illegal?

    McCabe sat on info…not illegal.
    Lynch took over NY FBI Garner investigation…not illegal.
    Comey re-opened HRC email investigation and then, promptly closed it…not illegal.
    Other than Weiner sexting with a 15 year old, what can be prosecuted?

    I don’t think that any justice will be served…especially with Sessions in charge of that department.


  32. jeans2nd says:

    Comment upthread of mine a mistake, partially. Comey did mention search warrant. Senate Judiciary 3 May 2017, q from Sen Feinstein.

    Feinstein – 00:49:27 “Why was it necessary to announce 11 days before a Presidential election that you were opening an investigation on a new computer without any knowledge of what was in that computer?”

    Comey 00:49:53 “October 27, the investigative team that had finished the investigation in July, focused on Secretary Clinton’s emails, asked to meet with me…they laid out for me what they could see from the metadada on this fella Anthony Weiner’s laptop that had been seized in an unrelated case.”
    “What they could see from the metadata was that there were thousands of Secretary Clinton’s emails on that device, including what they thought might be the missing emails from her first three months as Secretary of State…If there was evidence that she was acting with bad intent that’s where it would be”

    —>>>00:50:52 “…they said we think we gotta get a search warrant to go get these.
    And the Department of Justice agreed, we had to go get a search warrant…”

    —>>>00:50:58 “…I authorized them to seek a search warrant…” description here of Abedin’s emails on Weiner’s laptop, and looking for Clinton’s “intent.”

    00:52:12 “And the team also told me, we cannot finish this work before the election. And then they worked night after night after night, and they found thousands of new emails, they found classified information…” more Abedin and Weiner here

    00:52:33 “And then they called me the Saturday night before the election, and said thanks to the wizardry of our technology we’ve only had to personally read 6,000, we think we can finish tomorrow morning, Sunday…we did not find anything that changes our view of her intent…””

    This was all about searching for intent, which is not in the law afaik.

    Comey testified the date he, Comey, found out was 27 Oct 2017, not 21 Oct 2017.

    Was this another contrived story by Small Group to stall DOJ, and perhaps protect Clinton?
    Why did DOJ not know about no need for search warrant? If not, why not? Did DOJ find out later? If so, was that why Lynch was so po’d? (Lynch had to clean up another FBI mess.)
    These ppl are curiously incurious.

    If “search warrant” is another contrived story, would appear Comey’s not yet figured out some are cooperating. Dummy.
    Good grief these people are stupid. Universally stupid.
    Liars are always caught, eventually.
    At any rate, the “search warrant” story does not hold up. imo


  33. bxb says:

    Comey is only capable of a “soft probe”
    It’s like trying to push a rope . . .


  34. WeThePeople2016 says:

    As others have been saying, let’s hope that Rudy knows all of this when he sits across Mueller at the negotiation table including what is on the laptop.


  35. Pursang says:

    NYPD has a copy of the hard drive.

    Let her rip.


  36. Truth&Honor says:

    Hmm I wonder if a deal was struck and Weiner is actually under FBI protection because he’s actually a witness.


  37. MTK says:

    If there is… The Prequel – Understanding Lisa Page and Peter Strzok…

    Then there has to be a Anthony Weiner Prequel – Understanding the Abedin/Hillary Relationship.

    After reading this blog article that outlines the foundations of the actions taking by the principles within the FBI and DOJ concerning evidence Anthony Weiner’s lawyer turned over to NYPD/SDNY and the political football the evidence became towards the end of the 2016 election cycle.

    One has to wonder what was Anthony Weiner’s state of mind to betray the private confidences of his inner circle. By betray, I mean betraying a core group of people he had to have intimate knowledge of their dealings.

    He just didn’t wake up the next day after the sexting story broke across the MSM, and decide to gather up all of his wife’s communications. The shear size and scope of what was being communicated to DOJ DC about what his lawyer turned over to SDNY indicates a methodological gathering of data over months if not years.

    Enter into the picture – Resentment

    Could it stem all the back back to his first instance of getting caught sexting and the result of losing his seat in the House of Representatives. Could he, after years of witness numerous instances of political fixing, felt betrayed and left wondering why, “With his closeness by marriage to the very political apparatus that protray’s itself as being beyond reproach bar none.”

    Now add to the picture – Anger

    While, I feely admit I am projecting. Still, the similarities and differences between his marriage and the Clinton’s is worth analyzing.
    First, the question of who wear the pants in the Clinton marriage is like all marriages complicated. It is a marriage spanning decades, with many public short comings.
    Yes, to many Hillary was betrayed as a wife and a women, however if rumors are true she just used this to advance her political fortunes.
    I for for one don’t believe for a second she was troubled by this, her entire MO is calculating.
    In other words Bill Clinton would likely not have been Bill Clinton with Hillary in her corner.

    But, back to Huma and Anthony, she is a long time operative of Hillary. She in many ways, through closeness of observation, marries a man as deeply flawed as Bill yet with differences…
    “She was definately in controll.”
    “She had the power over Anthony’s rise politically… this is Anthony Weiner, Huma husband, who would not bend over backwards to please him, husband to Hillary’s right arm.”

    How often would he reminded himself of that.
    How often would Huma and likely Hillary would remind him of that fact.

    Call it intuition, but my guess is Huma and Hillary often likely belittled him in front of him through wisper tones and likely put it terms of you are no bill clinton.

    Now, image armed with this suspicion, he logged on to Huma emails accounts.

    Enter the picture retribution.
    His eyes are wide open, Huma and Hillary regard him with contempt, openingly discuss his down fall from grace and abandonment.
    This is where he has the key to extract…

    Enter into the picture – Revenge


    • MTK says:

      SD has on several occasions double down on the Ekic Prince take of what is in the batch of data turned over to SDNY and to a lessor extent the Qanon take on the emails although keeping a distance.

      This is where I am troubled…
      I want to be forthcoming, but fear in my openiness to logically discuss the issue will do damage. It is not a question of fear of the Truth, it is a question of deconstructing the evidence/facts as aviable to me to arrive at the Truth, leaving me wondering does my set of crayon’s do harm.
      There are things I could say, but don’t. I judge them in merits, “am i trying to appear the smartest person in the room, or does it add to the discussion or send it off into ‘troll land’.

      In other words I understand the narrative that can unfold, that an officially acknowledging and release of the content of the Anthony trove of data does to Nation, just as easily it is to understanding the results Anthony’s trove leads to labling the entire TreeHouse full of nuts and by extension the “soft coup” as a narrative built on wishful thinking by placing its hopes on a silver bullet.

      It is not easy, dealing with a known unknown, yet along the unknown unknowns.

      We are asked to believe, even trust a plan…
      And I say it unequivocally…
      Are we chumps, only waking up to find our course in history has been controlled and decided by those though elected concider themselves our betters.
      On one hand, we are trying to believe, a page has been turned, the corruption is being dragged into the light of day. On the other, hand if political forces have mapped our destiny for many years, even decades, who is to say, part of droping the pretence that we are a representive republican form of government is not about, “Just that, dropping all pretences”.

      It comes down to faith folks, it is all we have left.

      No more lies…

      And for any one to read more into what I just said, “I remind everyone, even God himself, that is a valid observation to be drawn from learning you been lied to.”


  38. scott467 says:

    “The amount of garbage that they found in these emails, of criminal activity by Hillary, by her immediate circle, and even by other Democratic members of Congress was so disgusting they gave it to the FBI, and they said, ‘We’re going to go public with this if you don’t reopen the
    investigation and you don’t do the right thing with timely indictments,” Prince explained.”


    I’m not buying that.

    If you have the goods on Clinton, the LAST people you EVER contact before making arrests is the FBI or ANYBODY connected to the Hussein administration.

    You make the arrests NOW, you make them FIRST, and THAT forces all the Bad Guys above you to DEAL with the consequences.

    If you go to the Bad Guys FIRST and tell them you’re “about to do something”, all you’re doing is giving the Bad Guys the opportunity to STOP you, to take that responsibility AWAY from you.

    If I saw a video of Hillary and Huma sexually abusing some child and then eating the child’s corpse, I’m not calling anybody at Hussein Central or Clinton Command to give them a heads-up or make any demands. I’m making immediate arrests and releasing enough video to the public to make sure Clinton and Huma can’t even make BAIL.

    If they ‘reached out’ (I hate that term) to the FBI, the ONLY reason they did so is because they were fishing for someone to STOP them. To give THEM plausible deniability as to why THEY didn’t make arrests.


    • jello333 says:

      “video of Hillary and Huma sexually abusing some child and then eating the child’s corpse”

      I just gotta say, this is the one part of all this that I do NOT believe for a second. (Not saying you do either.) Some of the “Pizzagate” stuff?… yeah, maybe. But not nearly to the extent it’s being spread around. So no, while I believe some of what Prince says, it’s ONLY some. I think once it all finally sees the light of day, the vast majority of the really bad stuff is gonna involve Clinton “pay to play” deals, and is gonna involve big names from all over the world. Will some of it even involve “pedo rings” and such? Maybe, but if it does I suspect it’ll be more indirect where Clinton and others are concerned. More like “We’ll just pretend we don’t know about your extra-curricular activities… now where’s the money?”

      Liked by 1 person

  39. Rynn69 says:

    Yawn. And NO ONE does a thing to stop all this…


  40. A small point, that may be significant. Looking at the timestamps of the text messages, especially when referencing meeting times about to take place or just wrapping up…it appears that the Page & Stzrok texting devices are Not Set to the Eastern Time Zone (are they really working & texting at 3am?)…What if anything is the significance of this? Is it an attempt to more easily obscure the process of connecting the dots? Could those devices have originated from a foreign source (who retained the ability to “spy” on their communications in real time?)…Has anyone looked into that aspect of this whole sordid tale?


    • PS says:

      GMT is eastern US EST+5hr, which is a standard reference for computers. So 3am GMT is more like 10pm Washington DC time.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Thanks…I know at wordpress you can change that setting…I don’t have a cell so don’t know if you can change that (easily) or not. You’d think that the government would want “their” devices to reflect the accurate timezone as their items could be subpoenaed, or whatever…


  41. The person in the Justice Department in charge of investigating Hillary Clinton’s emails was Peter Kadzik. Is he next in line for a criminal referral from Internal Affairs Director Michael Horowitz?

    The referral will be revealed as soon as next week according to Horowitz. The investigation began Jan. 12th, 2017.



  42. DDrake says:

    When they all begin to TWITCH at the end of rope, Justice will begin.


  43. jello333 says:

    I’m about a day behind. I read this post really late last night and got about 3/4 of it, so now I re-read it… and some things started to click. It feels as if some of the details we had been learning little by little, and some that we only suspected, are right on the verge of becoming PROVEN FACTS!

    I know there are “White Hats” working behind the scenes, but I tell ya… to me there’s nobody more important to this than Sundance. Were it not for him, I’d be borderline insane from anger and frustration right now, and I doubt I’m the only one. 90% of what I know about this whole thing, this whole historic conspiracy is thanks to Sundance. One of my goals in life is to someday be able to repay this guy for all that he’s done over the years.

    Liked by 1 person

    • jello333 says:

      In case I wasn’t clear, when I say “this whole thing” I’m talking about ALL of it, not just the Clinton email stuff. I consider it all to be part of one giant intertwined conspiracy… pro-Hillary is one part, anti-Trump is another. I realize this particular post is focused on the pro-Hillary part, but my brain just always mixes it all together. 😉

      Liked by 1 person

    • Landie Landie says:

      Go up and read some links I posted that will add to your hope re: this. Sundance is awesome. A Reddit post adds more light.

      Liked by 1 person

  44. Landie Landie says:

    CTH WOW! What a great job you do. Hope is alive when combined with Q anon “crumbs”.

    Especially “crumb” drop # 1287

    and these:


    Holy shit..Read this new Conservative Treehouse article on the Strzok texts regarding HRC Emails/Weiner laptopNews(theconservativetreehouse.com)
    submitted 2 days ago by ButtersStotch88 to r/greatawakening
    26 commentsshare

    I’m CONVINCED something big is going to drop soon and it’s all related to the Southern District of New YorkOpinion(r/greatawakening)
    submitted 2 days ago by ButtersStotch88 to r/greatawakening
    175 commentsshare

    Nice..Q…..we all are beginning to really SEE.


  45. I think Weiner’s laptop was subpoenaed, not seized. That explains the attorney handing it over. When NY FBI found Hillary emails they had to wait to read them. The delay was intentional. NY threatened to leak it. So Comey opened and shut it.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s