Supreme Court Blocks Termination of DACA Program – Justice John Roberts Makes Political Stand…

A supreme court ruling today has blocked the termination of a court-admitted unconstitutional executive action known as DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals).  The background of the DACA controversy, and the prior position of the court on the sister program DAPA, makes this ruling the most political ruling yet by Chief Justice John Roberts.  [pdf link to ruling here]

The court decision was a 5-4 ruling.  Justice Roberts sided with the four liberal justices in blocking the termination of the executive program.  What makes this ruling outrageous is within the majority opinion of the court they recognize the Trump administration has the legal and constitutional authority to terminate the program; but the court, specifically John Roberts, doesn’t like the way in which the administration might do it.

The crux of Justice Roberts’ opinion is openly political.  The majority admit there is no constitutional protection for DACA recipients, and the Trump administration has the authority to dissolve and reverse the protections under the previous executive action; however, Roberts specifically cites his concern with deportation.

Accepting the argument that benefits provided by DACA were illegal, Roberts observed the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), via the DACA dissolution memo of Elaine Duke, could have still retained protection from deportation. Framing the argument of Justice Robert’s concern is that DHS concluded, without any explanation, protection from deportation terminates with the removal of DACA protections and benefits.

Additionally, Roberts added, former DHS Secretary Elaine Duke (2017) did not address whether DACA recipients had counted on the existence of the program in arranging their lives; if she had, he suggested, she “might have considered more accommodating termination dates” for DACA recipients who were in the middle of academic programs, military service or medical treatment.

The core of John Robert’s argument is that DACA recipients, the previously transported children of illegal aliens into the United States, would be subject to deportation if the DACA protections were terminated.

Judge Roberts, and all other justices, concede the executive action could be terminated or reversed because, well, after all it’s not a law; but their majority decision rests on their expressed desire to block deportation.  That’s the fulcrum of the Robert’s opinion.

That is not a legal position, that framework is entirely a political position.

The admission that President Trump has the authority to terminate DACA, and the simultaneous admission they don’t like what Trump might do after the termination, is why I say this is the most political decision to ever come out of the Supreme Court.

To make the issue even more unfathomable, we must remember when the sister program known as Deferred Action for Parents of Arrivals (DAPA) was terminated, Justice John Roberts was on the other side of the argument.  WHAT A CONTRAST.

After the death of Justice Scalia there were only eight justices on the supreme court.  In 2016 the court ruled 4-4 to allow the lower court ruling to stand that terminated the DAPA program (Judge Andrew Hanen).

In the 2016 ruling Justice Roberts supported the termination.   However, in 2020 with an almost identical fact pattern between DACA and DAPA for legal review, Justice Roberts flips his position and blocks the termination.  Yeah, that’s political – nothing more.

♦CONSEQUENCES – President Trump has openly said he was awaiting a ruling in favor of the termination of DACA so that congress would be forced to finally deal with the issue.  The core outlook for President Trump was to use the DACA issue to force resolution inside a much needed immigration bill.

Without a doubt this decision today must be very frustrating.

The ruling doesn’t stop the Trump administration from terminating DACA eventually; it only blocks them from using the 2017 DHS memorandum issued by DHS Secretary Elaine Duke.  Which again points the political nature of this particular decision.

The Trump administration can still use the June 2018 termination memorandum issued by DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen; which was written in support of the previous Duke memo and which the supreme court refused to consider in their review…. Because the SCOTUS wanted to punt the DACA problem to the November 2020 election.

Yes, that’s correct.  The concerns the Supreme Court had with the 2017 DACA termination, memo outlined by DHS secretary Elaine Duke, were reconciled by the 2018 DACA termination memo written by Kirstjen Nielsen…  That’s why SCOTUS refused to review it.

FUBAR.

This entry was posted in Activist Judges, Big Government, Cold Anger, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Illegal Aliens, Legislation, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Supreme Court, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

309 Responses to Supreme Court Blocks Termination of DACA Program – Justice John Roberts Makes Political Stand…

  1. Conservative Foundations says:

    for DACA recipients who were in the middle of academic programs, military service or medical treatment.
    I understand how the illegals get in the colleges.
    WHAT I DON’T UNDERSTAND???????????? How in the h*** do they get in the military? I spent 8 years in the War on Terror. And I joined late in life in Navy spec ops. I had to submit all kinds of paper work. Proof of this and that, had to dig out high school stuff.
    How are illegals in the military?

    Liked by 13 people

    • 🍺Gunny66 says:

      they give them Green Cards…..a Green Card gets you in.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Adele Virtue says:

        aren’t they eligible for citizenship after serving?

        Liked by 3 people

        • Conservative Foundations says:

          I know of only that being applied to Filipinos. I do think they might get preference.

          Like

          • Fergus Boone says:

            In the mid 50s Eastern Europeans were being recruited by the military for use as stay behind forces after an anticipated invasion of Europe. They were given citizenship, but the prospect of acting in a suicide role couldn’t have been too appealing and I’m guessing that these men were desperate to get into the USA rather than sit in Europe.

            Like

        • YeahYouRight says:

          No, which seems sketchy to me. You serve, you earn your place.

          Like

      • czarowniczy says:

        I had a many non-citizens in my units from Vietnam forward, deal was they did a clean stretch in the military and they got citizenship. I was in one unit that had a lot of Mexicans in it who’d fought in the Korean War, they’d enlisted, fought (one was a NK POW) and they got citizenship. They put their lives on the line and regardless of the legality of their being here they earned that right. There’s a ****load of ‘born’ citizens out there living off of the earnings of other who’ve done nothing for the country other than draw breath and take up space and they get to vote.

        The military’s not as fussy during wartime – hell, they took me – and lets its requirements slide some to get bodies in. I have no problem with illegals cleaning the slate by enlisting and serving honorably, beats having our country awash in cartel and welfare drone illegals by a wide mile.

        Liked by 2 people

    • Jan says:

      It is one way they can earn citizenship. You’ve got to admit, joining the military puts it out there that they will give their life for the U.S., potentially a good candidate for citizenship or permanent residence. Much better than refugees who don’t assimilate or chain families who don’t assimilate either.

      Liked by 4 people

  2. Todd says:

    I wish President Trump would have just told them to put the question on the census are you an American citizen. If he had went ahead what could they have done to him.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. fred5678 says:

    DAPA rewarded the stolen jewels to the burglars.

    DACA rewards the stolen jewels to the children of the burglars.

    Chief Justice, does that explain how outraged American citizens are???

    Liked by 4 people

    • mike says:

      Dred Scott didn’t matter either…

      Liked by 2 people

    • cali says:

      @fred5678: If anything it is now crystal clear that Roberts is compromised. It explains also the shit show on the FISA court which is also Roberts responsibility cleaning it up when questions arise as it did with the ‘silent’ and unexplained removal of Rudy Contreras and the Flynn case.
      No explanation given to this day.
      The rest of the FISA court demanded Roberts attention after all that we – the citizens learned. Making excuses or feigning ignorance is insufficient.

      Whatever Brennan and Hussein have on Roberts gained via the ‘Hammer’ needs to be exposed. That would explain his unconstitutional rulings since ACA.

      Like

  4. Wethal says:

    I agree this was a political decision, but the political decisions I really fear are the Trump tax returns and Mueller grant jury material cases.

    Like

    • Dutchman says:

      IMHO,
      There is NOTHING IN the Mueller Grand Jury material, OR in DJT’s tax returns, -0-, nada, NOTHING.

      They don’t want to disclose, because there is nothing there,…”no there, there”.

      What they want the narrative to be, is “Trump fighting release of his tax returns, there MUST be something IN them!”

      “Trump admin fighting release of Mueller grand jury transcripts!
      There MUST be something IN them!”

      And then they can speculate, laundering drug money, whatever.

      Putting him in a position where he HAD to claim executive priviledge, to preserve it for future Presidents.

      “Trump claiming executive priviledge, to block Bolton testimony!”

      Lawfare: try to manipulate the,POTUS into doing something that can be framed as “Obstruction” and “Abuse of Power”, over and over and over….

      Liked by 10 people

    • The Phantom Stranger says:

      I have no doubt the Democrats have Trump’s tax returns for every year dating back to the 1980s. I’m sure they’ll fabricate some story as we get closer to the election year.

      Even if there is nothing there, and I don’t believe anything is there, momentum and irrational belief on the Left is that Trump’s tax returns will somehow reveal years of corruption.

      That narrative is too powerful on the Left for them to ignore in a presidential election year. We will get some some sort of October disclosure in the media that somehow paints Trump’s taxes as something evil. Take that to the bank.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Fubu says:

        Big Effing Deal. As Satan’s Bride once said in a hearing, “At this point, what difference does it make.”

        Liked by 3 people

        • Will Hunt says:

          Agree. The dem/lib/soc have spectacularly succeeded in their efforts to make themselves the most hated, pariahs in America. They are deluded enough that they have no clue of the enmity in which they are held but the vast majority of Americans

          Liked by 1 person

  5. https://spookdblog.blogspot.com/2018/11/chief-justice-roberts-blackmailed.html

    Editorial Note:
    There is no question that Chief Justice Roberts loves his adopted children and has given them a superb home environment; and, under normal circumstances, we would not condemn him for his actions. Since the mothers of the children Roberts adopted went to Latin America to give up their children for adoption, they skirted Irish adoption laws, and theoretically, Ireland would have no jurisdiction over the adoption.

    The sad fact, however, is that Roberts technically broke Irish Law in the adoption of his two children, leaving himself open to blackmail by his opponents [e.g., the Obama Administration]. Thus, ObamaCare, which violated countless Constitutional issues in which Roberts dismissed the legal challenges presented and endorsed ObamaCare in a convoluted decision — which decriminalized ObamaCare and essentially destroyed the existing US healthcare system.

    Obama Used NSA “dirt” on Boehner to pass Spending Bill
    The Obama Administration was notorious for threatening its opponents and enemies with measures ranging from blackmail to physical threats on individuals and families.

    This process began in Chicago during Obama’s campaign for the Illinois State Legislature when his opponents all dropped out, and later, in his run for the US Senate when his opponent mysteriously withdrew, replaced at last minute by a token GOP opponent whom he easily defeated.

    Liked by 12 people

    • mike says:

      Personally I suspect there is something far worse than Irish adoption law irregularities that controll the puppet strings of John Roberts..,

      Liked by 16 people

    • fred5678 says:

      “Seven of Nine” is the answer to this century’s best trivia question.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Jeff says:

      Hi, Mike.
      Re: Hussein’s Illinois Senatehood: His opponent didn’t “mysteriously” drop out.
      (I know the following because I’m a Star Trek fan)
      His opponent, creepy sleazy Jack Ryan, was married to Hollywood actress Jeri Ryan, best known for her role on “Star Trek: Voyager,” among others. Jack Ryan was a Jeffrey Epstein/Joe Biden kind of creepy pervert. He liked to go to sex clubs, wife swapping, that whole scene. He wanted to drag Jeri Ryan with him, and she said, “Yeah, I don’t think so, Hoss.” The divorce soon ensued. It was a messy tawdry affair by all accounts, but Ryan, being a high profile public figure, had all those court records of the dime store porn novel proceedings sealed by the judge, and they were indeed, shall we say, graphic, because Jeri’s lawyer dropped a nuke on his sorry ass. Then here comes The One, and he somehow got those records unsealed and leaked, and that was all she wrote. Ryan slunk away in shame and disgrace, and the seat was now Obama’s. Pure Chicago politics. As Harry “Popeye” Reid once infamously said, “It worked, didn’t it?”

      Liked by 2 people

      • grumpyqs says:

        Valerie Jarrett ran the Chicago City Hall for the Daley’s for many years. She apparently learned a great deal about getting things done the “Chicago Way”. Illinois is known far and wide for their Dollar General judges and politicians! Unsealing divorce records are just as easy as falsifying marriages, births, employments and Illinois Bar decisions. Another famous lady from Chicago also employs the “Chicago Way” but that one prefers deaths.

        Like

      • Jimmy Jack says:

        You are correct however I think he coerced the wife to go along with it. That’s in the divorce proceedings IIRC. And I believe there’s more to it as well – shady deals on top of it.

        Like

    • Jimmy Jack says:

      Just like the eNay executives I have no doubt both the Obama & Clinton campaign threatened people or their families.

      I suspect they must have something more on Roberts. I think most people would view the adoption issues as a legalese. Plus it’s too obvious to be effective. There must be something much bigger.

      Liked by 1 person

    • DiodeBill says:

      Some more history based on my experience and readings: I managed an Allstate claim office in Eden Prairie, MN. The ACORN organization, led and directed by Obama out of Chicago was besieged by his underlings attempted to enter my office and disrupt and protest the business in a private building. An astute receptionist keep them at bay in the lobby while alerting me to the problem. They were refused admittance and threatened to call the police which kept them out. From there on, I new Barry Soreto for what he was and still is. He wants to take control of everything political, subject us out of our constitution, run the globalist’s agenda and rule us as a tyrant… continue his life as our “leader” without our constitutional rights and our freedoms. He knows best what is good for us and for his personal power and ego.

      Perhaps his close friends, Bill Ayers and Bernadette Dohrn, his “wife” could explain more about BO’s motives since they are of like mind like many of the Chicago supporters they hang with. They are communists who want to overthrow our government and are very active in continuing their plotting. Ayers and Dohrn should have been put in jail for life as domestic terrorists. Ayers appears to have finished the two books BO/BS didn’t finish even though he got significant advances to do so. I read the Book “Deconstructing Obama” which the literary critic notes in the book that the very obvious writing style of Ayers vs. Obama’s, who lacked writing level skill of Ayers, and time to finish the book, was very evident in the book. Look up either name to get the low down on Barack’s buddies. This is scary stuff!

      Like

  6. Carrie says:

    Just to make a point of how flawed Justice Roberts finding is, when PT gets re-elected, he should fire off several EO’s that are a burr in the side of Democrats for ages. One should be to end birthright citizenship. Another should be to allow conceal and carry nationwide 😁

    Liked by 14 people

  7. 335blues says:

    Here’s an idea.
    Instead of terminating the previous executive
    action, issue a new one that accomplishes the same thing.
    If the black robe idiots try to block it,
    then ignore them.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Coast says:

      He could, if he had a Congress that would back him.

      Like

      • David M Kitting says:

        This is nuts!!!
        Supreme Court opinion is NOT the law of the land. Judicial opinions/rulings are dependent on the co equal Executive for enforcement, as are unlawful Legislative actions.
        The Founders called it ‘checks and balances’ on the overreach of any one branch of Government.
        The lawlessness infecting Governments is reflected in the streets.
        No police? The garbage men can pick up the dead looters.

        The Constitution, “…it’s only keepers, the people” George Washington

        Liked by 6 people

        • czarowniczy says:

          ‘Checks and Balances’ relies on honest politicians. Guess the Founders just didn’t think that one all the way through. Then again they also didn’t realize how future POS pols could parse the Constitution into a noose to hang the country with.

          Liked by 1 person

          • David M Kitting says:

            czar,
            They thought it through alright. The Constitution is the law of the land and as Washington said; ‘it’s only keepers, the people’. Government is The People’s creation. Therefore, We are the solution. We, who don’t let the media control our perception/perspective.

            Liked by 1 person

            • czarowniczy says:

              I’ve said it’s our responsibility to keep the country afloat and the Constitution safe all along, problem is the crud hiding in the underbrush.

              With all of the perfidy the British crown perpetrated on the colonists around the world I’d think the Founders would have for seen the roaches slinking into the inner workings of the government and destroying it from the inside.

              Once the Pelosi/Schumer owners are in power they’ll have DC and Puerto Rico made states, effectively caging the House and Senate. They’ll also add at least 3 more justices to the Supreme Court (they’ve already said they’ll do that) effectively making the Republic a dictatorship of the elite and rendering the Constitution o moot document of historical interest only.

              Liked by 1 person

    • Missy says:

      Was exactly my thought.

      Like

    • thedoc00 says:

      You did not read the decision. The President’s EO was disallowed because he did not follow a process. The logic was tortured and flat out dishonest but that decision tells you all you need to know how Roberts would handle a new EO that does not follow “the process”. A new EO that does not follow “the process” is DOA from 9th Circuit decision to Chief Justice Roberts’ court.

      Liked by 2 people

  8. Publius2016 says:

    Globalist “Chief Justice” Roberts is a SAD SICK DEMON!

    his ruling has no logic and his rulings will lead us to BABEL!

    2020 Election is everything!!!

    Census and Tax rulings next!!!

    Like

  9. sync says:

    Judge Hanen issued an order today firing up the States DACA lawsuit which had been on hold:

    P. 3: June 18, 2020

    State of Texas v. United States of America (1:18-cv-00068)
    District Court, S.D. Texas

    https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6382288/118-cv-00068-state-of-texas-v-nielsen/

    Judge Hanen’s view on DACA

    Hanen may issue a summary judgement in favor of the States and then on to the Supreme Court

    Liked by 3 people

  10. parleyvous says:

    John Roberts is responsible for all the illegal FISA approvals. Enough said.

    Liked by 15 people

  11. Rileytrips says:

    I never elected Chief Justice Roberts. I am a citizen of the USA, and I have rights, too. Chief Justice Roberts has disenfranchised my civil rights and the rights of my family by over reaching – like a tyrant – the powers of the Executive Office. We elected President Trump to make decisions, Executive Orders, and sign off on legislation for us.
    Chief Justice Roberts has elevated his decisions over the President’s – this IS a Constitutional Crisis.

    Liked by 5 people

  12. hawkins6 says:

    I can’t take this winning anymore. Please stop!

    Liked by 1 person

  13. 4sure says:

    So, if executive orders cannot be rescinded by another POTUS, PTrump needs to flood the country with ex. orders. Let Roberts eat cake.

    Liked by 8 people

    • dscottv says:

      Don’t look for them to be consistent…they’ve got a different set of rules for this president.

      Liked by 3 people

      • foo says:

        All the more reason to do it:

        Be the adult in the room by forcing them to repair the damage as soon as possible after he leaves office.

        Start the executive apparatus per APA drafting something like national concealed carry and pre-emption of local gun control laws by establishing a new, minimum level federal agent designation to those who wish to carry for public safety against the riot-mobs.

        This will force immediate litigation:

        Heads, we win, tails they lose. The window for rule by executive fiat must be closed.

        Liked by 1 person

      • It wasn’t the order; it was the process.
        Use the correct process and do it again.

        Liked by 1 person

    • grandmotherpatriot says:

      Obama never created an Executive Order for DACA as it was an Executive Action and signed by Jeh Johnson which makes it even crazier that Roberts stood with the LIEberal Judges but, I am not surprised.

      Liked by 1 person

  14. Greeneghis Khan says:

    Why if Trump wrote an EO to do something else say, abolish income taxes. It would be illegal right off just like DACA. Congress would scream. Some one would sue and it would go to SC and then could be argued that ROBERTS set the precedence for an unlawful act to be given judicial protection.

    Boom Swamp drained……..

    Liked by 1 person

  15. California Joe says:

    Roberts dislikes President Trump and the Americans who voted for him. Roberts simply doesn’t want President Trump to be reelected.

    Like

    • Cal Joe: I think Roberts has gone way beyond “dislikes”. My impression is that Roberts loathes Trump, and that hatred far exceeds any professed love of America, the Constitution or his oath of office.

      In the last four years, we’ve seen unbridled, foaming-at-the-mouth hatred coming from not only the left, but from his own party, plus the execrable Never Trumpers, military brass, media, etc. I continue to be amazed that the PDT is still standing. Of one thing I am certain, though: his love of America is boundless.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Rileytrips says:

        “Foaming at the mouth”… it appears they all have Trabies – Trump Rabies.
        They all behave like rabid animals in their hatred of our President.

        Like

      • Peppurr says:

        Agree Barbara. Roberts has gone off the rails which I would coin as open hostility.
        It’s sickening.

        Liked by 1 person

        • I remember watching Roberts’ confirmation hearings. At the time, the one word I used over and over in characterizing his demeanor was “smug”. Set my teeth on edge. “Smug” has since morphed to “contemptuous”.

          When the cheering started that conservatives finally got a 5-4 majority (with Kavanaugh), I was not among the pompom crowd. Roberts is on the left (doesn’t matter why), and both Gorsuch and Kavanaugh are establishment elite to their bones. We need some buttkickers from Podunk, not Haahvaad.

          Liked by 2 people

          • Jimmy Jack says:

            You took the words right out of my mouth. And Kavanaugh is Bushie as well, neck deep into the Patriot Act that created the mass spying programs being weaponized against us.

            Liked by 2 people

  16. lambgraham says:

    No surprise, Justice Roberts is dirty as can be. He oversees the FISA requests and has done nothing.This was ground zero for the coup.He is fox guarding the hen house.
    The only hope is Ratcliffe carrying on where Grenell has left off .
    The State Department is another problem. The Democrats did not make a move without Soros approval. Why does Pompeo not release what Judicial Watch requests? Send in the US Marshals.
    Why not interview Julian Assange before he gets knocked off? I’ll put my money on Seth Rich being the guy who provided Wikileaks with the emails.
    Why no indictments by Barr for false statements by all the individuals who signed off on FISA?
    Since Lamb Graham and his fellow Senators refuse to call in the Bidens and Obama the Democrats get the green light to attack Trump again.
    Ratcliffe get your ass in gear, your our only hope.

    Liked by 4 people

  17. Would be nice payback if RBG or Beyer retires just before the election and PDJT nominates a constitutionalist who isn’t compromised (if he can find one). Now that would trigger the left.

    Separate note. I am sure PDJT knows whatever information Injustice Roberts is being blackmailed with so PDJT should just air Injustice Roberts’ dirty laundry. He will then resign or have no reason to vote against his conscience (assuming he has a conscience).

    Liked by 2 people

  18. sync says:

    Until there are no cops left in New York city….

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EavEMoQXkAIZVtP?format=jpg&name=medium

    Like

  19. Todd says:

    Do I understand correctly there is still a decision on the census to come although to late for this time around? Also Electoral College and Trump taxes.

    Liked by 1 person

  20. hawkins6 says:

    Liked by 9 people

  21. What’s Denzel up to right about now? I’d like to see his Equalizer character get Medieval on some asses.

    Rant over.

    Liked by 1 person

  22. What’s Denzel up to right about now? I’d like to see his Equalizer character get Medieval on some asses.

    Rant over.

    Like

  23. Ellis says:

    He should terminate it again tomorrow just to rub Robert’s nose in it.

    Liked by 2 people

  24. CTH Fan says:

    IMO John Roberts is counting on President Trump losing the upcoming election. Obviously he feels he has to stay on the good side of the DS since they put him on the Supreme Court in the first place.

    Do we really think justice will be served, no matter what Prosecutor Durham finds? The only way we can beat this behemoth is get out in overwhelming numbers in November and win so soundly that whatever they try to change the result will fail.

    We will probably have go through the same drawn out process that we went through before, but we can still win. McConall and his crew needs to be relegated to the back bench for a while.

    Liked by 2 people

    • vigiles24 says:

      The left is absolutely desperate at this point, and they are throwing everything they can at the president, hoping something will tarnish his reputation. They are doing this now because they know they won’t be able to do it later.

      Liked by 1 person

  25. Yy4u says:

    Those who ask how we got here from where we started have only to observe the SCOTUS.

    Left wing Marxist leaning presidents are allowed to sign executive orders to advance Socialism and/or the erasure of the US’s borders but conservative presidents are not allowed to undo them.

    In short only leftist or globalist presidents are allowed executive orders.

    And that dear treepers is how the long march to tyranny happens. Step by step.

    Liked by 4 people

    • The Phantom Stranger says:

      Sadly, that sums up the situation nicely. Democrat politicians, backed by the force of the court system, media and multi-national corporations, can enable almost any legislative agenda without opposition.

      The professional Republican political class is little more than controlled opposition, giving 50% of the country the illusion there is still a choice.

      The globalists running things have gamed the system so thoroughly they can’t lose.

      We are going to lose the force of the Second Amendment within the next decade. The Left will be smart about it, implementing it slowly over time instead of simply grabbing guns in one sweeping law.

      We are nearing the point when political solutions don’t work anymore.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Jeff says:

        I think an additional factor is the global demographic curve. A sea change will occur within the lifetimes of those now present. Maybe not for us old folks, but the younger ones….

        Liked by 1 person

  26. Galahad says:

    Congratulations we Americans have no faith in any branch of our Government. Its Donald Trump a few good advisors, and politicians against every other institution in America. It’s all up to us. This is the most important election in US history. Pray!

    Liked by 2 people

  27. mr.piddles says:

    Can a new Executive Order be issued that simply changes the DACA rules? If Obama can issue an EO create DACA… can’t Trump issue an EO to simply modify its parameters?

    Add requirements such as (legit) Civil Service, military, whatever. Add a Green Card requirement. Want to stay? Apply for a Green Card, go through the process just like anybody else.

    Are DACA recipients required by the government to do ANYTHING WHATSOEVER?

    Make it as painful as possible for CONGRESS to keep DACA around. Ultimately, it is CONGRESS’ problem to fix. Right?

    #DefundDACA

    Liked by 1 person

  28. islandpalmtrees says:

    The Chief Justice, John Roberts, of the Supreme Court should be impeached for ignoring an illegal action, because he does not approve of how DACA will be corrected. DACA was created based on an illegal action.

    This is not the first time that John Roberts decided to ignore an illegal action. Take for example thousands of FISA warrants issued under his direct supervision. Don’t investigate the corrupt actions of the FBI or his 12 judges.

    I could go on quoting chapter and verse of other such actions, but lets save them for his impeachment.

    Like

  29. Make book on this: the Second Amendment will fall next. The Supreme Court will rule on it next term. Justice Julia Roberts and the other weasels will finish the Constitution off once and for all.

    Like

    • Ospreyzone says:

      Perhaps. But it will not result in my surrendering even one firearm. I choose not to obey unconstitutional laws.

      Liked by 1 person

      • The Founders were amazing (prescient?) in the way they worded the 2nd Amendment (“The right of the people…..shall not be infringed”). Too many Americans believe the government (i.e., Constitution) “gives” us rights, never thinking critically. If the gov’t can give us rights, they can take them away. Our rights to life, liberty (2A) and pursuit of happiness come from God…or if you prefer, “nature”.

        I also agree with Edwin Santiago (above) that Roberts plus 6 (everyone except Thomas and Alito) would have no qualms about telling us that what the founders meant by militia means “National Guard” today. They happily deny cert to numerous 2A cases, knowing full well that blue state governors (especially the loathsome Northam of Virginia) will chip away at firearms ownership. They also know that law-abiding firearms owners won’t burn down City Hall or the State Capitol, and won’t run through Target and Walmart for looting and destruction.

        Like

        • Scott B. says:

          Government can neither grant or revoke rights – it can only violate them!

          To violate the second amendment will only serve to activate it.

          Tread carefully.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Well said. I’m not a firearms owner, although other family members are. But I’ve studied the founding era and understand the Founders’ motivations. Actually, that part’s easy — they made their views and motivations pretty clear. They were absolutely fearful of tyranny, and tried their best to make it difficult, if not impossible, to achieve. But power is intoxicating, and those with access to it often succumb to the lust for more. Ergo Roberts.

            Like

    • The Phantom Stranger says:

      I expect the Supreme Court declaws the Second Amendment within the next 10 years. That is why they are so obsessed preventing Trump from putting another conservative on the Court.

      Now that it’s clear Roberts has become an out and out liberal vote, expect to see major gun restrictions in the coming years.

      Like

  30. swampfox999 says:

    If he cares about his legacy, Roberts just destroyed it and showed he is a small legal mind with little to no judicial integrity. Sad, really. He is not a stupid man–He’s just weak and lacks coyones. He’ll go down as another legal midget. He can learn much from Justice Thomas on how to be a man. We need to re-elect Trump for a lot of critical reasons, one of which is to really turn the Supreme Court toward faithfulness to our Constitution rather than to political preferences and petty paybacks. It is not unlikely that ACLU Ginsburg and wise Latrina Sotomayor won’t be around much longer.

    Liked by 1 person

  31. Eric says:

    Liked by 4 people

  32. Wake Up Democrats! says:

    The blacks that stay Democrat are fools. Don’t they realize they are still Democrat slaves? The Democrats have been using the blacks only to get their vote. The Democrats have never done anything for the blacks to help them in jobs. While Obama and Joe Biden were in office 8 years, they did nothing to help blacks or anybody. When President Trump became President, he did so much for the blacks and all races, but if Joe Biden wins November 3, 2020, then the blacks will become Democrat Slaves again. Wake up people of all races, the Democrat Party will destroy America with no cops, open borders and chaos and no jobs if they get in. Be very careful who you vote for November 3, 2020, your life depends on it. Keep President Trump in for 4 more years so he can bring all those jobs back like he did before the China virus attacked us. Vote for President Trump for 4 more years of good jobs, law and order and safety from our enemies who want to destroy America, especially China.

    Liked by 3 people

  33. Neo says:

    The upside (or downside): there is now a SCOTUS ruling that says you can’t change anything until the paperwork is filled out correctly.

    Now, imagine an Administration that somehow keeps doing the paperwork improperly on programs it doesn’t like.

    The Executive Toolkit has just been enlarged. Nixon’s sequester returns in a new form.

    Liked by 1 person

  34. golfmann says:

    I hope he just does it anyway and says sue me…

    Liked by 1 person

  35. Fergus Boone says:

    Trump needs to deport them via executive order and tell SCOTUS to pound sand. Its time to tell SCOTUS to clean upp their act or he will defund all federal courts not mandated by the Constitution. There is only one court mandated as they well know and if the others disappear SCOTUS will lose 90% of its power.

    Liked by 1 person

  36. jx says:

    DACA is not a law. The Court’s opinion is MEANINGLESS.

    Liked by 2 people

  37. Todd says:

    Can the decision on sex orientation ever be revisited or is it over?

    Like

  38. TwoLaine says:

    Reminds me of what they did on adding back the question of citizenship on the 2020 Census. You can do it, but not now. Try again and come back some other time..

    Both totally legal for President TRUMP to have done, he just didn’t do it to their alleged high standards. If only he came up through the right ranks and hired the right people he wouldnt be such a screw up. Maybe you would have got it right the 1st time.

    Blathering idiots.

    Liked by 2 people

  39. ezgoer says:

    In 3-2-1 … get ready for the bill co-sponsored by Lindsey Graham and Rubio to give DACA amnesty with citizenship and right to vote in November election.

    Liked by 1 person

    • jx says:

      Grassley too.

      The Republican Party is beneath contempt. They either get therir act together now or the country is over. This is their last chance. One or the other party will be destroyed, the other will eventually split. If the Democrats win the country is done. Democrats should easily be destroyed, but not to be outdone the Republicans will insist on blowing their own heads off. They put great effort into snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

      Like

  40. swampfox999 says:

    In his irrational, spurious, lawless and arbitrary opinions in the obamacare case, the census citizenship question, the Title 7 definition of sex case (thru Gorsuch), and now this DACA case, Roberts with an assist from Gorsuch has done more harm to the Constitition than the rioters and looters ever could. When the Supreme Court is lawless, we got real problems. That’s yet another big reason why we have to re-elect President Trump.

    Liked by 1 person

  41. Joe says:

    Everyone just relax… Neither population growth nor majority sways will change the true definition of what America is. The essence of America is born from love and harmony with each other and our environment. From the belief that together, we can integrate with such precision, our talents and determination to not only survive, but thrive! No other nation in history can claim this distinction!

    What if immigration were monitored more closely? As an American, I would gladly identify myself and my location without protest in return for virtually unlimited personal freedoms and then open our doors wide to all people who will committ to our combined strength vs anything else period! So what is America?

    JUSTICE AND EQUALITY FOR ALL, PEACE AMONGST ALL RACES, WAR AGAINST ALL EVIL.

    Just imagine, who knows how powerful our Nation could be if we just got synchronized with each other instead of fighting???

    What we really need is for more people like us, who are willing to sit down and have a conversation, to have access to the existing global assets when used to improve the entire World infrastructure, right now!!!

    Current global controls will never give up their control, so we will just need to surpass their abilities and, Bob’s your uncle?

    Look, there’s WAY too many of us out there for them to eliminate. I have to believe that! Let’s have a little bit of courage and some faith in ourselves. So many of us are longing to link up and destroy the evils that plague us. it’s a very powerful potential that one day we will hopefully enjoy together.

    Like

  42. erobot says:

    Roberts finally out of the closet as a gay lefty.

    Like

  43. I recommend a copy of Men in Black, How the Supreme Court is Destroying America. Maybe one day we’ll find out what liberals have on Roberts….

    Liked by 1 person

  44. rah says:

    President Trump should tell the SCOTUS that I do not abide by your rulings on either DACA or ICE/”sanctuary cities/states” and here by will assert the executive power as clearly stated in the US constitution. What are you going to do about it, Chief Justice Roberts?.

    I remember a scene from the movie “Walking Tall” where Bufford Pusser relegated to\he corrupt County court room to be a mens room because it was within his authority as Sheriff to do do. I would Love to see president Trump do the same to the SCOTUS. Let them “rule” as they may, but tear it down, destroy it’s stature.

    Like

  45. jediphantom says:

    I could be mistaken, but it seems this is another TAIL WAGGING THE DOG to get Conservative media off the topics of SPYGATE and the LEFT WING PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRAT ATTACKS ON THEIR OWN VOTING BASE VIA THE RIOTS.

    If we have a SECOND WAVE of the CHINESE KUNG-FLU as we are being told, the POTUS can end all migration of ANY KIND using that as a reason. And nothing is really preventing him from INCREASING DEPORTATIONS OF ILLEGALS anyway. We have a whole bunch of airplanes from the airline industry just sitting around on tarmacs everywhere. PUT THEM BACK TO WORK.

    DEPLORABLE JEDI.

    Liked by 1 person

  46. Chokdii8888 says:

    Amazed that a 21st century version of the Sons of Liberty has not arisen. Another Sam Adams. Remember Andrew Breitbart ?

    Liked by 1 person

  47. Talk talk talk talk talk talk talk talk. Blah blah blah
    Oh look, more outrage. Why the surprise or outrage? This is what the liberal uniparty is going to do. They will do whatever it takes to advance their agenda – by hook or by crook. Obviously they either have something on little johnny roberts or he was another RINO plant by lib uniparty bushie or a combo. In either case why the outrage? Not a surprise.
    Our side needs to fight back. Obviously the court if corrupt and this is an illegal use of their powers so Trump needs to fight back and fight back hard. Use the jackson tactic of telling them they made their decision now they can enforce it. Go ahead and end daca and tell the court to shove it. That part of the republic died long ago anyway.
    The fight commenced long ago and its time to join in and push back on the libs using their own tactics.

    Liked by 1 person

  48. RonR says:

    We are seeing the destruction of our Constitutional Republic by the activist Supreme Court. The two most recent cases, and there are many, on DACA and equating gender identity with sex are crystal clear cases of legislating by the Supreme Court. We are having laws passed by unelected Supreme Court justices who sit on the court for life leaving the people little or no recourse to address these abuses. A reading of these decisions might lead one to believe they are purposefully meant to throw the nation into turmoil.

    DACA was passed unlawfully by Obama EO and yet the Court blocks Trumps attempt to abide by the law and the constitution. Gorsuch’s ruling that gender identity equates to sex in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 will be devastating to women’s sports, women’s personal privacy, religion, employment and much more. It is a ruling to ensure chaos in American society. Any deficiencies in the Civil Rights law should be fixed by the legislative branch, if the legislative branch so desires.

    It appears that Roberts and Gorsuch and others, Supreme Court Justices no less, do not understand how our Constitutional Republic works, especially the separation of powers. Even a high school senior should be able to understand that the Supreme Court simply does not have the power to legislate and the court is meant to be the weakest of the three branches. It is clear that the Supreme Court has usurped power that belongs to the people through the legislative branch. The people can remove and replace legislators, but not Supreme Court Justices. This is blatant and clear overreach by the Court and the net result will be dangerous destabilizing of societal norms, disrespect for law and our (no longer) Constitutional system of government, and a demoralization of the citizenry.

    We have been going down this road for decades, but now we have hit the full crescendo of the symphony to sew chaos and destruction of our constitutional system. What do our rulers on the Supreme Court have for an encore, court sanctioned euthanasia for young and old? Roberts and Gorsuch should be removed from the court, but we have no tools to deal with Supreme Court justices who claim to be constitutional originalist, then get on the court and trash their very oath to the preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. I think that this is just about the most serious threat to our nation that we have ever had to face, absolute cowards on the Supreme Court violating the very oath they swore to uphold.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s