Sidney Powell Discusses the Ongoing Persecution of Michael Flynn With Lou Dobbs…

Michael Flynn defense attorney, Sidney Powell, appears on Lou Dobbs tonight to discuss the ongoing case against a background of daily revelations showing Flynn was the target of the Obama-era FBI.

This entry was posted in 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, Activist Judges, AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Deep State, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, FBI, IG Report Comey, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, media bias, Notorious Liars, propaganda, Russia, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized, USA, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

125 Responses to Sidney Powell Discusses the Ongoing Persecution of Michael Flynn With Lou Dobbs…

  1. arsumbris says:

    She has a 1000-yard stare now.

    Liked by 25 people

    • mr.piddles says:

      Imagine doing 12-, 13-, 14-hour days dealing with that crap?

      Liked by 19 people

      • arsumbris says:

        She looks BEYOND pissed off.

        Liked by 15 people

        • grainofsalt2 says:

          She is indeed beyond angry. Also, as I watched her talk, I noticed a bump in her throat, I am hoping that she had already have it checked out. I recently lost my sister because she let it grow.☹️

          Liked by 5 people

        • NJMAGA says:

          She’s friggin had it. This isn’t going to end well for her opponent.

          Liked by 10 people

          • mikeyboo says:

            And every one of her opponents will deserve the worst the universe can offer.

            Liked by 4 people

          • James Carpenter aka "Felix" says:

            I just hope she is willing to give some time to her own needs. As career landmarks go, I suppose anyone would be pleased for their work to be remembered in this episode.
            But damn, lady! You should be able to kick back and have some time to savor it yourself too!

            Like

        • Dutchman says:

          And never more beautiful.
          IMHO,
          The original 302, and agent Pientka, will never see the light of day.

          Because the 302 is the KEY piece of evidence, needed to charge Stroxz, Page McCabe and unamed co-conspitators with Conspiracy to tamper with evidence and Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice, and possibly Conspiracy to commit misprision of felony.

          Without the original 302, testimony under oath by the AUTHOR of the original 302, testifying under oath would be the alternative, although obviously not as good as the document.

          In order to prove, in Court, beyond a reasonable doubt that the 302 was materially altered, you MUST have the original.

          This is, I believe the hook Durham can hang his hat on; Barr said people will be indicted IF we have sufficient evidence to prove they committed a crime.

          Hence my suspicion we will never see the original 302, or Pientka testifying.

          As for the District Court responding to the Mandamus (or as I like to call it “Sullivans MAD at Us!) Filing, I can’t see the court denying it, as Sidney said after the recent ruling. And, if they don’t WANT to grant it, they will simply do nothing, for as long as possible.

          These ARE ‘Lawyers’, or at least people who studied and know the law.
          They know what KEY pieces of evidence any reasonable Prosecutor would HAVE to have, to make a Prosecution stick.

          Eliminate those (and yes, its tampering with evidence, but given the charges they are avoiding,…whats one more?

          Knowing whats IN the documents they have been blocking, we would probably be able to see that likewise, they are key pieces of evidence NEEDED to prosecute crimes.

          So, unable to contain everything, to contain it totally, they allowed much out, while focusing on those things which demonstrate culpability.

          Hence, the portion of Rices email to self which remained classified for so long, without any justification.

          I think Barrs statement that Durhams investigation will not involve criminal investigations of Obama and Biden was disengenuous;

          I believe the thrust of Durhams investigations will be a massive Declination memo; a “Durham report”.

          It will contain MUCH “damning information”, but will spell out, in any charges that would be made against any of the coupists, that KEY, VITAL pieces of evidence don’t exist.
          Hence, NO indictments or prosecutions.

          I truly believe, in much the way the Mueller Weismann team TRIED to trigger PDJT into firing them (aka the “Costanza gambit”) there is a coordinated action to trigger PDJT into firing Barr, and personally taking charge of the DOJ,….So they can impeach him for Abuse of Power and Obstruction of Justice,…..again.

          They hope that THIS time, the charges will give Senate Republicon leadership political cover, to SAY theycwould vote to convict.

          Sullivans behavior, Barrs behavior are both to the same end, of this goal.

          Its the Ongoing Coup, is what we should call it, as like terrorists they know they just have to succeed ONCE.
          IMHO,..

          Liked by 1 person

    • All Too Much says:

      John Stockton coming of a Karl Malone pick for the game winner.
      Stockton’s eyes were steel I those situations.
      Like Powell, a sniper waiting to kill.

      Liked by 1 person

    • trump20162024 says:

      “Lou, it could not have been lost, it could only have been destroyed.”
      . .
      Wray needs to be FIRED immediately.

      Liked by 6 people

  2. Deplorable_Infidel says:

    “Sidney Powell, appears on Lou Dobbs tonight”

    Probably the best venue for her to appear. The more fair & honest exposure she receives, the better for Gen. Flynn. Too many lies for too long on “the other (vastly larger) side.

    Liked by 20 people

  3. Yeah. There is a fire burning there. Burn it all down.

    Liked by 7 people

    • There is steel there in Sidney. I like watching her talk, but she is beaming white hot light.

      Liked by 11 people

      • samwise163 says:

        And she speaks directly, to the point, and with cold anger 🇺🇸

        Liked by 15 people

        • All Too Much says:

          Too bad her court appearances on the Flynn case aren’t broadcast.
          She must terrify people in a courtroom.
          That’s a blessing.

          Liked by 3 people

        • Augie says:

          And with it all, every single sentence she speaks is gramatically flawless, structured perfectly, built with the best choice of words, impossible to misunderstand, and delivered at just the right time.

          Liked by 10 people

          • JC says:

            Yes, good point, Augie. Praying for her, General Flynn and his family.

            Sidney, if you’re reading here tonight: thank you for all you do and for standing in the gap for General Flynn and for our country. Paltry words for your heroic brilliance, strength and stamina, but thank you all the same.

            “…take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one.”
            Eph. 6:16 NIV

            Liked by 15 people

          • Dutchman says:

            Augie;
            Exactly the SAME way she writes her briefs and motions. A good looking lady, with an incredibly beautiful mind!

            Your description perfectly describes her speaking and her written words.

            Sure wouldn’t want to go up against her, in Court. Never took a plea bargain, but Sidney as a Prosecutor, could have tempted me!

            Liked by 2 people

  4. billybob says:

    Anybody arrested today?

    Liked by 3 people

  5. Coast says:

    The FBI is being reformed? When did that start and why didn’t someone tell me?

    Liked by 4 people

  6. goldvalkyrie says:

    She was on Rush’s radio show today (Mark Steyn was sitting in for Rush). Mark did a great job asking fresh, pertinent questions. She had a few fresh takes and answers I hadn’t heard in other interviews. Rush’s audience is approximately 43-million listeners, so she had a large audience listening to her message. She pulled Flynn from the probable abyss and really does belong in the Justice League – Powell Powered.

    Liked by 26 people

  7. samwise163 says:

    Lou is a patriot and I’m glad he has her on his show almost everyday.

    Liked by 13 people

  8. mikeyboo says:

    Sidney Powell is the heroine of the century!

    Liked by 10 people

  9. CountryDoc says:

    Grassroots. Carry the message. Like the 12 disciples. Like the American Revolution. Don’t waste time arguing. There is mental illness and toxicity in trying to engage with the enemy. Appeal to the spirit of our U.S. Government. It is there. It is growing. That is what makes up the spirit of POTUS rallies, the tweet following, the growing core group, the polls which can’t be supressed.

    His Truth is marching on. Truth will not be denied. Don’t waste time or energy. They have tried to kill the and subvert the Republic, and the will of We the People. They have tried to supress truth, steal power, kill patriots.

    Any more, I do not engage unless I perceive someone is honestly seeking truth. Otherwise, I just shake my head and say, I am sorry, you are blind.

    Liked by 18 people

  10. Jimmy R says:

    We love you, Ms. Powell!

    Liked by 7 people

  11. GTOGUY says:

    She needs to go on Tucker Carlson Tonight. His audience is larger than Hannity on some days. Plus he is soooooo smart.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Peppurr says:

      I didn’t know that about Tucker’s audience, but, it doesn’t surprise me. And I agree about Tucker being smarter. Heck, everyone on FOX is smarter than Sean. He gets the best guests on his show, but many times, too many guests at the same time. They get time for 30 second answers when we want to hear more from them. We know they have more to say of value. You can see it in their faces when they’re shut down.

      Like

  12. johnnybiface says:

    It’s clear that the principles in the Obama administration and some current members held over or retained, are plainly bad people. They lack a judeo-Christian conscience. They have the sociopathy of a criminals in a crime family. Its a viral immorality and sociopathy.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Brutalus says:

      Critical Race Theory…he will campaign like MLK…he will govern like Malcolm X

      Like

    • Dutchman says:

      They are CONmunists,…working to destroy our Republic, because what makes our Country exceptional, is what makes it the biggest impediment to establishing Global Conmunist one World Government.

      Just as the Congressional Republicon leaderships behavior, going back many years, can NOT be explained as timidity, stupidity or even greed,….

      The actions of the Obama admin can likewise not adequately be explained away as accidental, stupid, incompetent, etc.

      They armed the Mexican drug cartels, with high powered weoponry, ramping up the violence, fueling a massive increase of illegal immigration, and then implemented policies designed to encourage it. Accident?

      They supply weoponry to build up ISIS, as well as feeding into the arab spring, and triggered civil war in syria and Lybia, which triggered a diaspora of refugees, fleeing the violence in 10’s of Millions, into EU and US.

      And EU policy was to absorb them, as was U.S. policy with tax $ supporting them.

      They signed horrible (for US) international agreements,…including Paris accord and Iran deal.
      The assumption is that they shut down operation Cassandra, because they didn’t,want it to interfere with the Iran deal. Suppose thats NOT why.

      After all, when PDJT was negotiating a trade deal with China, he repeatedly brought up Fentanyl, and Chinas complicity and responsibilities regarding fentanyl.

      So, lets drop any pretence of illusion, …

      When your enemy reveals themselves, by consistent, prolonged enemy action,….don’t make excuses for them.

      BELIEVE THEM!

      Liked by 1 person

  13. margarite1 says:

    Those clips of Tucker are pretty dang interesting as well. How long before FOX tells him to shut up because he’s speaking a brutal truth?

    We need to have public hangings of traitors.

    Liked by 2 people

  14. delighteddeplorable says:

    So very true, Doc. Arguing with them is useless and frustrating, so why bother. It’s that silent majority thing and we are coming. Resolutely and robustly.

    Here’s a soundtrack for your post:

    Liked by 6 people

  15. Bogeyfree says:

    Wray IMO has become obvious and laughable

    And Barr giving O a pass is reminiscent IMO of Comey’s no intent pass to HRC

    Yep, One System of Justice!

    Liked by 2 people

  16. starfcker says:

    I’m starting to consider a different theory. The White House meeting on the 5th might actually help the White House people. Was this entire operation FBI and maybe CIA? Was Comey’s megalomania simply him being a suck-up big shot (the man with all the answers) to impress the President of the United States? Did the White House or some upper DOJ know what was going on in Comey’s FBI prior to those last couple of weeks? I’m starting to think they might not have. Was the White House in a total panic once they were briefed into the loop on what had been going on in the FBI? Was that Comey trying to gain leverage so if the ship went down he wasn’t the only one holding the anchor? Is that why we keep coming back to Chris Wray? Comey? McCabe? Stzrck? Page? Mueller? These are all FBI people. Is this what Bill Barr means when he says he doesn’t see evidence that includes Obama or Biden? Is he right?

    Like

    • Riffico says:

      I hope someone asks Sidney what Flynn knew and would eventually make known
      that scared the Obozo Admin. so much ?

      Liked by 5 people

      • Dutchman says:

        I don’t think its what he KNEW, its what he would DISCOVER;
        As Nat Sec Advisor, they feared he would become aware of the illegal spying which had become so prolific, and they hadn’t adequately covered up, because they thought SHE would win

        And, based on previous experience with him, the knew he,was uncorruptible, and that once he found out he would blow the whistle, LOUD.

        Hence, “First we F*ck Flynn, then we F*ck Trump!”

        They went after Flynn first, right off the bat, cause they HAD to get him out if there, poste haste. BEFORE he could learn what they had been doing.

        For instance, if he had asked to review the unmasking requests of the previous outgoing administration.

        Liked by 1 person

    • sDee says:

      Had the briefing come out of left field to Hussein, two weeks before the end of his term, he could have easily neutralized it by informing the incoming President on the what appeared to be illegal spying on him, his family and his incoming staff, and wished him well.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Serpentor says:

        Obama’s warning to Trump about Flynn was an admission that Obama set the entire thing up. Obama not only DID NOT tell Trump about the illegal spying, he told Trump that Flynn was up to no good – when in fact, Flynn was being set up.

        Liked by 11 people

    • Jase says:

      It probably means that that loathsome Neanderthal thug Brennan has been good at covering his and Obama’s tracks.
      This has got Brennan written all over it; Comey, McCabe and their merry band of Boy Scouts at the FBI were just willing useful idiots.

      Like

      • upstate909 says:

        Funny you should say that. I was digitally exiled from three platforms for stating my gut instinct..It was Brennan. There are far too many foreign actors in this screenplay for it to be initiated by FBI…CIA had to give them a false lead somewhere to get them involved.

        But then again, maybe the PATRIOT ACT really did change all the rules so we citizens do not understand what is going on.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Dutchman says:

          “Maybe the Patriot act changed everything”; yes, it DID.
          It resulted in the MOU between the FBI and CIA, in which each got something they wanted, and hadn’t previously had.

          The FBI got access to NSA database, and CIA got to open up a station in D.C., under the guise of FBI-NSD, with Stroxz an agent of both agencies,…and with no IG oversite.

          Like

    • NJMAGA says:

      “POTUS wants to know everything we’re doing.”

      Liked by 6 people

      • MVW says:

        “POTUS wants to know everything we’re doing.”

        Thank you for cutting through the above attempt at blowing smoke and gas lighting. I get tired of the attempts at distraction and imaginings that somehow, someway Obama was merely there smoking a bong.

        Liked by 2 people

      • starfcker says:

        That’s the winner right there, NJMAGA. Because that text was in September 2016. Great job destroying my theory.

        Like

      • BitterC says:

        The quote from 8/5 after a mtg Strzok had with “the agency” where he says:
        Other than {redacted} quote “the White House is running this” is even MORE damning.

        They scoff at the idea with Lisa saying:
        Yeah, wahtever(re: the WH comment). We’ve got the emails that say otherwise

        Like

    • Johnny says:

      I briefly considered your train of thought, and I had actually to be honest thought it over early today. It is a legit thought process and theory.

      My reason for telling myself I am crazy is because of all the laws of this country that the Chicago con man that, previously presided in the Peoples House, blatantly thumbed his nose at.

      And everytime I see that Susan Rice, I remember the ease of which she lied to the American people about how an Ambassador of United States was killed because of a video.

      A thought just crossed my mind about the gay Ambassador that was left to die by Obama, Hillary, and Rice.

      Another gay Ambassador is hell bent on exposing every corrupt Obama official as possible. Could it be there was a flame between them in a past life, or is it the Genius of President Trump using Ric Grenel, who might have an axe to grind.

      Liked by 2 people

      • starfcker says:

        Thanks Johnny. I’m a big believer in exploring every plausible possibility. I tell the guys that work for me, if you’re going to be an idea guy, be prepared to be wrong 90% of the time. But be bold and put your ideas up. Let the world work its magic. It’ll save you a lot of mistakes.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Jack is Back says:

        “gay flame”? as Bob Uecker was known to quip… “juuuusst a little bit outside!”

        Seriously, Occam’s Razor sez it best for me. Ric Grenell is an unhyphenated, E Pluribus Unum’ed UP, American PATRIOT, who looks like he’s here to kick ass and chew gum — and he’s all outta gum.

        Luv the guy. Can’t wait to see where Trump positions him next, after Radcliffe takes over the Directorship. Nothing like watching progressivos ‘splodey heads in response.

        The JG

        Like

    • Coast says:

      If Obama didn’t know what Comey was up to until that meeting, then he sure as heck didn’t do a darn thing about it. Like stopping it, shutting it down, etc. Instead he directed Rice to write a “cover” letter and for Comey to keep on keeping on. Sorry, but that dog don’t hunt.

      Liked by 1 person

    • GB Bari says:

      No. Simple basic reason is – Ozero is desperate to get Flynn taken out as evidenced by his recent public message pleading to Judge Sullivan. Flynn is under a gag order until the case is decided. Ozero knows that Flynn will blow the lid off the remaining unspoken details of the interview with Strzok & Pientka, as well as the dirty details of Ozero’s shenanigans with Irangate and abuses of the Intelligence apparatus.

      No, Ozero seriously wants Flynn taken out with prejudice. Jug Ears,VJ & Co-conspirators see no upside to the DOJ dropping the case and thus exonerating Flynn.

      Liked by 2 people

    • sturmudgeon says:

      star… do you ACTUALLY believe what you posted? Have you not assessed Obama over the 8 years he was “in charge”?

      Like

  17. Osugagal says:

    Just now watching a replay off Lou’s show. Wilbur Ross is talking about Huawei. He is as sharp as ever but looks and sounds physically weak.

    Liked by 1 person

  18. Realist says:

    DOJ Barr’s precipitous exoneration of both Obama and Biden is strangely reminiscent of Comey’s preemptive exoneration of Killary Clintoon.

    Liked by 4 people

  19. Bob Lynch says:

    Sidney Powell, and Lou Dobbs, puts Barr to shame. I don’t know how Barr can look any freedom loving patriot in the eye. He will forever live in infamy if he fails to do his duty. Just as Obama and Hillary will for their failure to do their duty at Benghazi. Now Trump has the duty.

    Like

    • MVW says:

      Barr needs to grasp that the caustic rot that is left when such monumental AND exposed corruption is not answered with commensurate Justice tells all our enemies and all future mega criminals to GO AHEAD, THE WAY IS CLEAR! It is the death knell of our Republic.

      When the DOJ, FBI, and Judges become the Hear no evil, See no evil, Tell lies for ‘reasons’, our Republic is lost.

      Communist Chinese Party will grasp it even if Bondo Barr does not.

      Like

    • CountryDoc says:

      As I said, he is either an enemy of the people and this nation worthy of hanging, or he is building an iron clad case that will be worth the risk taken to prolong things this long, or he is severely compromised and blackmailed. But even if he is compromised, his honor and the sacredness of this country should cause him to come clean.

      Like

    • scrap1ron says:

      Barr doesn’t have to look the peasantry in the eye. We don’t get invited to the cocktail parties he frequents.

      Like

  20. T2020 says:

    As the royals would say: “We are not amused.”

    Liked by 2 people

  21. Zorro says:

    More dot connections.

    Liked by 4 people

  22. Zorro says:

    Too far fetched, considering the insanity of the last 4 years…

    Liked by 1 person

    • Johnny says:

      Thank you for getting that posted on here. I am not good at getting links to copy here.

      I saw that earlier today and was absolutely floored by this guy.
      Man he nows how to operate a flamethrower. He is either a true whistleblower, and a brave one, or he is certified crazy.

      Like

      • Cam Heck says:

        I follow Johnheretohelp onTwitter. John is alleged to be a whistleblower/ former insider at DOJ/ Baltimore with intimate knowledge about the misdeeds of not only Judge Sullivan, (who John says is as dirty as they come) but also Rod Rosenstein, who he says arranged the murder of Seth Rich.

        Like

    • MR52 says:

      Not enough there to prove anything. I know we want Sullivan to be busted, but more facts are needed. Does this add an element to Pizza Gate?

      Like

  23. Skidroe says:

    I live in Indiana and I would be ok with President Trump replacing Pence with Powell. He won’t do it so put her in charge of the DOJ.

    Like

  24. Nancy Churches says:

    I’ve never had a hero or heroine and I’m 67. But I have one now in Sidney. So gutsy, so smart. Just awesome! (And she looks amazing.). Thanks Sidney. You rock.

    Liked by 6 people

  25. Skidroe says:

    I wonder if China sent the plague to President Trump when they had the trade meeting in Jan. and GOD stepped up and protected our President from getting it. I do believe GOD made him President in 2016.

    Liked by 1 person

    • sturmudgeon says:

      Skidroe.. and, is directing or allowing this same President to suffer all the crap thrown at him, and at his wife and children… sounds about par for the course from the ‘almighty’.

      Like

  26. 335blues says:

    Chris Wray, FBI Director:
    -has been covering up exculpatory evidence benefitting Flynn for over 3 years
    -was Andrew “law fare against America” Weissman’s supervisor on the Enron task force,
    and who sent 4 executives to prison for 4 years while, again, exculpatory evidence was hidden
    for 6 years
    -along with Michael Chertoff destroyed the firm of Arthur Anderson, and destroyed the jobs
    of 85,000 citizens.
    -refuses to produce the original 302 for Flynn’s interview claiming it is “missing”.
    However, it CANNOT be missing because an automatic copy would have been made
    by the Sentinel system, and if the 302 and its copy were deleted, the Sentinel system would retain
    information about who destroyed the 302’s, and when. Wray is refusing to turn over this
    information to the defense.
    – the “2nd draft” of the 302 highlighting the changes made by Strzok, Page and others, and signed
    off by McCabe is also hidden by Wray.
    Why are AG Barr and Wray refusing to produce this information they are required by law to turn over to the defense?
    Why is AG Barr protecting Chris Wray and Andrew McCabe, who obviously are dirtbags?
    Is AG Barr a dirtbag?
    18 U.S. Code § 2384. Seditious conspiracy
    If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dutchman says:

      335blues;
      The 302’s would be the essential piece of evidence any reasonable prosecutor would HAVE to have, in order to charge Page, Stroxz, McCabe and unnamed co- conspirators with Conspiracy to tamper with evedence, Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice.

      In order to PROVE, in court, to a Jury, beyond a reasonable doubt that they materially altered the 302, you MUST have the original.

      Otherwise the defence says “PROVE they materially altered it!”

      Read through your copy of the Sedition statute, and remove the words “by force” and you will see that every action listed is protected by the bill of Rights.

      I can, right here on the internet, legally advocate for the overthrow of the government,…as long as I don’t mention force, I am just excercising free speech.

      Point is, they didn’t use FORCE, so they can NOT be convicted of Sedition, sorry.

      But, with the 302’s, they COULD be convicted of CONSPIRACY,…and each affirmative action (each thing they did that furthers the goal of the conspiracy) can be a seperate 10 year charge.

      Easy to get to effective life sentences, the kind that make people flip,…hence the “unnamed co-conspirators” in the indictment.

      Like

      • Jerry Joe says:

        If “by force” are two words that are troubling, then why limit its boundaries to armed conflict? Our President has declared war – even invoking the War Powers Act – upon the spread of a virus. No armies nor guns, but a perceived foreign attack against our People. Barr wrote a compelling brief regarding the “Judge Sullivan-like” exploitation of the rule of law by Special Counsel which propelled him into the AG office. “by force” of the intentional application of a baseless and nefarious interpretation of the rule of law to effectuate removal of the duly elected and highest Executive Official ought satisfy the principled intention of the sedition statute. The actions of the Special Counsel amount to much more than an exercise in free speech.

        At some point – think failed rogue mutiny on a vessel – someone would be attempting a ‘forcible’ removal of our Commander-in-Chief.

        Liked by 1 person

        • sturmudgeon says:

          Jerry Joe: Thanks… “words have meaning”

          Like

        • Dutchman says:

          Sorry, your trying the Wiesmann disterprentation of law. The perpetrators are evil, nefarious barstuds, but they all studied law, and conducted this coup, and are cintinueing to, btw, in such a way that they can not be convicted of Treason or Sedition.

          As I pointed out, there IS a way to prosecute them, and end up with effective life sentences, but I am afraid the death penalty is off the table.

          The major issue right now is not WHAT to charge them with, however. FIRST you need the WILL to indict and prosecute, which currently (I believe) does NOT exist in Barr/Durham.

          Its like taking a human life; you may well have 100 guns, while I am only armed with a bic pen, or a credit card.
          But, if you don’t have the WILL to pull the trigger, and I DO,….
          your DEAD.

          So, right now this is an esoteric excercise,…really.

          Like

          • Dutchman, where is the DOJ’s support for Sidney’s Petition. Where is Bagpipes?

            Like

            • Dutchman says:

              Playing his bagpipes, of coarse.
              He has no intention of moving the ball, IMHO. Nor does Durham, no matter how mean he looks.
              And, again MHO, assuming the DC appeals court is corrupt, they won’t affirm Sidneys writ of mandamus, they won’t deny it, either. I think they will just sit on it, doing nothing unless and until there is some time limit by which they MUST respond.

              On the other hand, I think the effort right now, is to ‘force’ PDJT to fire Barr, and personally take over DOJ, which as he has pointed out, he is legally justified and Constitutionally obligated to do.
              Them they can impeach for Obstruction of Justice and Abuse of Power.

              So, if forced I suspect the D.C. court to deny Sidneys Writ, Barrs statements, Sullivans motions, its all part and parcel of yet another desperate attempt at Impeachment.
              IMHO,..

              Like

              • There is a possibility DC Circuit gets greedy and not only denies Sidney’s Writ but they also expressly tells Sullivan he can do what he wants. In that case US Supreme Court could reverse.

                Like

                • Dutchman says:

                  Given the recent 9-0 SCOTUS decision, written by Ginsburg, their responce could be short;

                  “WHAT part of NO, you can’t
                  base decisions in CRIMINAL courts, on amicus briefs, DON’T you UNDERSTAND?!!!”

                  They might add a “Sheesh!” at the end,…

                  Like

    • OldParatrooper says:

      The seventh floor of the FBI Headquarters should have been well aware of the version tracking capabilities of the Sentinel system, and if they were intent on creating a plausible 302 to justify a CI investigation of Flynn they would likely have circulated a word document rather than use Sentinel. Once the agreed wording was achieved, they would have Pientka enter it into Sentinel. That way the “original” Sentinel version would be the agreed version, and the actual original word document would be deleted. You’d have to do a search of the IT archives to potentially find the backup copy of the word document, assuming it was captured by the Operating System and the IT Disaster Recovery System.

      Like

  27. carthoris says:

    Sullivan is clearly insane. He thinks Michael Flynn is Alfred Dreyfus and he, Sullivan, is the French Army High Command.

    Liked by 1 person

    • All Too Much says:

      Sounds like a Bogart movie.

      Like

      • carthoris says:

        “In 1896, evidence came to light—primarily through an investigation instigated by Georges Picquart [Sydney Powell’s role] , head of counter-espionage which identified the real culprit as a French Army major named Ferdinand Walsin Esterhazy [Hillary Clinton colluding with the Russians] . The Army {Insane Judge Sullivan] laid additional charges against Dreyfus [Michael Flynn] , based on forged documents [Comey, Strokz] . Subsequently, Émile Zola’s [Sydney Powell’s other role – dual role] open letter J’Accuse”

        Not a perfect repeat, but it sure rhymes.

        Liked by 1 person

    • MustangBlues says:

      Carthoris: They don’t teach international legal history nor literary allusions in crit law schools; it is all rhetoric and Machiavellian court politics. Pulp Fiction would be more current with their analogies of legal justification.

      Like

  28. republicanvet91 says:

    During President Trump’s next State of the Union, I would like to see Sidney Powell awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by FLOTUS.

    Someone who went the extra mile to insure that the SOTU by him could occur.

    Liked by 3 people

  29. vicarioushikermom says:

    I am so impressed with Sidney Powell. I cannot imagine what is going through her mind. She is so in control and so well-spoken. I would be screaming my head off at the crap she’s had to put up with!

    Liked by 2 people

    • MustangBlues says:

      vicariousmom: You are so right about Sidney Powell, such poise and intelligent purpose; she is the living prototype of the Strong Southern Woman, the grandmothers of my generation, a role model for all to respect and emulate.

      Like

  30. TRUTH says:

    Where’s Christopher Wray? Where has TRUMP been for THREE YEARS! We’ve known “all this” since “The Memo” and the Grassley/Graham criminal referral on Chistopher Steele? It’s purported that Steele is still working with the FBI.

    Seems like Trump finally figured out without Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania – the most draconian Barry puppet Dem Governor states – he’s going to lose.

    Like

  31. Ackman419 says:

    Thank you, Sidney!
    We love you and support you.
    You are a beacon of justice and liberty.
    May God bless you, guide you, and protect you.

    Liked by 2 people

  32. Sharla M Utz says:

    Bam…nailed it. I so miss Stock!

    Like

  33. truthbomb says:

    Great article by Lee Smith on why Obama has such a hard on for General Flynn:

    https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/russiagate-obama-iran

    Like

  34. Retired IG says:

    The words “freedom and justice for all” (from the Pledge of Allegiance) seem to be words forgotten. in the times we are living in. I have Sidney Powell’s book “Licensed to Lie.” Truth told I could not finish it because what what she exposed in her book made me so FURIOUS. Weissman should have been disbarred over a decade ago. Or faked his death just like Ken Lay did.
    Just thinking of myself in comparison, I can’t believe the self control Sidney Powell has in this situation.
    As Al Pacino said in the movie “Scent of A Woman” I’d be taking a FLAMETHROWER TO THIS PLACE! And I wouldn’t be able to suppress my glee at doing so.

    Liked by 1 person

  35. Retired IG says:

    My favorite scene fromthe move “Scent of a Woman.” I know I’ve posted here a few times, but I can’t help posting it again.

    Liked by 2 people

  36. Rex says:

    Slimeball politicians will appoint slimeball judges. All out in the open for everyone to see now. That should make for a good object lesson this November.

    Like

  37. mikeyboo says:

    Sydney, are we having fun yet?

    Like

  38. Jeffrey Coley says:

    Pull quote:

    “So if the Obama administration wasn’t alarmed by Flynn’s nonexistent ties to Russia, why was he Obama’s No. 1 target? Why were officials from the previous administration intercepting his phone calls with the Russian ambassador?

    The answer is that Obama saw Flynn as a signal threat to his legacy, which was rooted in his July 2015 nuclear agreement with Iran—the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Flynn had said long before he signed on with the Trump campaign that it was a catastrophe to realign American interests with those of a terror state. And now that the candidate he’d advised was the new president-elect, Flynn was in a position to help undo the deal. To stop Flynn, the outgoing White House ran the same offense it used to sell the Iran deal—they smeared Flynn through the press as an agent of a foreign power, spied on him, and leaked classified intercepts of his conversations to reliable echo chamber allies.”

    https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/russiagate-obama-iran

    Like

  39. Chilidog says:

    Where did the unmasking narrative originate? Why was it allowed to be pushed in the media for so long? Was it a purposeful disinformation campaign? What other false narratives are we chasing? Who on our side knew that Flynn wasn’t unmasked? The IC clearly wanted everyone to believe that Flynn was unmasked, and for three years no one within that community said otherwise.

    Like

  40. swampfox999 says:

    Sidney needs to add a new intro to her book that puts in context the clown’s decisions in Stevens, where the prosecutorial abuses that were being “asked” to be remedied by Holder were done during the Bush presidency and after the damage to Stevens was done and the dem party already benefited from that damage. It was a Kabuki theater pr move by a BHO loving clown judge and the corrupt Holder.

    Like

  41. Fools Gold says:

    Keep on keeping on Lou and Sidney! Personally I can’t wait until General Flynn gets to unleash his tongue & bullets at all of these walking free criminals in the name of justice!

    Like

  42. Perot Conservative says:

    TWO Misding 302s.

    1. Where is Attorney General Bill Barr?

    2. If the two 302s have been destroyed:

    A. Produce the individual & record of who destroyed the documents.
    B. Subpoena them.
    C. File criminal charges & kean on them.
    D. Go to backup copies & sites.
    E. Tap NSA – aren’t they supposed to have all of this?
    F. Explicit & further signs of the wide’rangung Conspiracy?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s