Chairman Nadler Sends White House and Republicans More Deadlines for Fast-track December Impeachment Effort…

Candidate Trump was framed for stealing a horse; President Trump was subsequently accused of trying too hard to avoid hanging for it. Prosecutor Mueller eventually conceded that Trump didn’t steal the horse; however, by then the focus was on Trump’s efforts to avoid the hanging.  Eventually Mueller testified; it surfaced there was never a horse to begin with… Impeachment was stalled.   Prosecutor Jerry Nadler is attempting to resurrect a legal theory that President Trump can still be hung for attempting to avoid the hanging, even if there was no horse theft.   Yup, that’s were we’re at.

Earlier Friday House Judiciary Committee (HJC) Chairman Jerry Nadler sent another letter to the White House outlining a December 6th deadline for executive participation in the coup by impeachment.  The chairman also sent ranking member Doug Collins a similar letter asking for rebuttal witnesses by December 6th.  In anticipation of Nadler denying the republican rebuttal witnesses he has scheduled a committee hearing on the republican complaints for December 9th [yes, same day as IG Horowitz report release].

Both of these requests, along with the prior “groundwork hearing” request, come from the HJC before the judiciary committee has received the House Impeachment Inquiry report from Adam Schiff’s HPSCI partisan impeachment committee.  Apparently the HJC knows the report content from Schiff’s committee; which means there will be no full committee review by any republican members of the bunker basement impeachment group.

Here’s the Nadler letter to the White House:

Here’s the Nadler letter to ranking member Doug Collins:

Here’s the initial “groundwork” letter to the White House:

  • December 1st – Deadline for White House response for participation in “groundwork” hearing.
  • December 4th – HJC “groundwork” impeachment hearing at 10:00am.
  • December 6th – Deadline for White House response for participation in HJC Impeachment Hearing.
  • December 6th – Deadline for House Republican witness list.
  • December 9th – Hearing to deny House Republican witnesses.
  • December 13th – House recesses for Christmas break.

No idea when Adam Schiff’s House Impeachment Inquiry report (written by Lawfare) will be delivered.  [ I do mean Literally written by Lawfare]

No idea when the HJC Impeachment Hearings will be held, or if they will just go straight to a House vote on impeachment.

Obviously Chairman Nadler is in a hurry.

This entry was posted in 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Donald Trump, Election 2020, Impeachment, Legislation, media bias, Nancy Pelosi, Notorious Liars, Occupy Type Moonbats, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Russia, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

279 Responses to Chairman Nadler Sends White House and Republicans More Deadlines for Fast-track December Impeachment Effort…

  1. James Groome says:

    What happens if the Supreme Court rules in the adverse on anyone of the House’s cases prior to the 9th?
    Does the entire Impeachment “thing” have to be rebooted back to DAY 1 in the House?

    Liked by 2 people

    • redthunder238 says:

      Have they even officially taken up any of those cases yet?


    • TarsTarkas says:

      If it’s against, they’ll simply ignore the ruling because of the rapists/white supremacists/racists on the court and carry on.
      Because you can’t allow laws, regulations, or rulings prevent you from removing Orange Man Bad because he’s so BAAAD!


      • Pat Thomas says:

        You are delusional… like the rest of the criminals in the fake coup attempt against the sitting President Trump. Absolutely pathetic.


    • Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

      I’ll take a stab at an answer
      (which is rare in these here parts anymore)
      SCOTUS hasn’t taken up either of the 2 key cases that would put essentially put
      “The All New Nancy Pelosi IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY Method of Impeachment”
      under the constitutional microscope.
      Ristvan detailed how spoiled the tax return case is…and it began before Nancy’s launching her IMP INQ like she was singing karaoke at open mic nite.
      The McGahn/6E cases most likely end up at SCOTUS fairly quickly, hanging chad style.
      where it probably GOES DOWN 9-0 for a whole host of reasons
      Unless Bagpipe Bill tanks it Brad Pitt/Sleepers-style
      (got to keep the CTH prognosticators and hand-wringers happy in their misery)

      The heart of both cases is
      the validity of the NEW IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY METHOD itself.
      Features of the NEW METHOD that SCOTUS are sure to adore:
      1) Makes the Speaker of the House AN ALMIGHTY GOD who can grab a mic and start an impeachment process (and HER WORD became LAW) and then
      2) CROWN a Committee Chair–ANY COMMITTEE CHAIR–as KING and arranging that committee (and others) into a GRAND JURY
      (See the Rules Committee debate on HS 660 where the Dems describe WHY Schiff was in the basement SCIF taking secret auditions….ahem…depositions)
      The math here is so simple even a Justice can do it:
      Lawmaker + Law Enforcement Agent + Judge + Juror = EMPEROR SCHIFF
      3) After a sufficient amount of one sided leaks of supposedly secret “grand jury” testimony…eventually get around to voting to authorize what has already happened.
      4) Nancy’s vote was BIPARTISAN AGAINST (unlike Nixon/Clinton)
      5) Rodino/Hyde BIPARTISAN rules were designed so everyone had seat at the table (INCLUSIVE)
      Nancy’s rules were designed for her KINGS to have the ONLY SEAT.

      Great evidence to show is any of Schiff’s publicly released HISTORICAL RECORDs of his secret basement work
      Like this one:
      Note the ONE THING Schiff definitely REDACTS:
      THE NAMES OF THE ELECTED OFFICIALS perpetrating this Impeachment Inquiry thingamabob.
      Sorry but when the Founders decided to include Impeachment…they made it START in the body closest to the people….the one with 2 year terms…so we could hold them to account if they decided to abuse that SOLE POWER. (Mutually Assured Destruction style)
      However, hard to hold them to account if Emperor Schiff
      HIDES THEIR NAMES FROM US in the historical record.
      Adam’s leaving us little in the ways of holding them to account but to resort to Option B:
      It’s on the LIST the Founder’s gave us……to protect US from THEM….
      right up at NUMBER 2.

      I don’t even think RBG’s corpse will go for this level of USURPATION of Power
      by a subset of a subset of one branch.
      Especially when she’s told she needs to bow down before the SPEAKER and address Schiff as “His Majesty” while not gazing directly into HIS RASPUTIN EYES.

      At least……..this is what I WOULD TELL the SCOTUS

      (Note while the SCOTUS cannot TELL the Legislative HOW to do an impeachment they certainly can articulate how NOT to….plenty of precedent including the Founders own words)

      Nancy could have more than one ruling against her HS 666 (or was it 660?) before this is all over. (and it won’t be before the 9th by the looks of it)
      And if the SCOTUS effectively rules against it…..Mitch McConnell has his out
      The SENATE won’t accept the product of a process ruled UNCONSTITUTIONAL
      So Nancy would have to go back to square one (Good luck with that)
      Oh….and IF she would
      UKRAINE would disappear and RUSSIA reappear (Even more luck with that)
      Can’t have that “whistleblower” testifying in a fair impeachment process

      And all this will be occurring post Christmas, IG FISA Report and
      as Durham volume starts turning up.

      IMO: Nancy will end with a CENSURE vote and pray the voters forget by November

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Bob Parker says:

    Ya know, some rich lib(s) put together a “Baby Trump” blimp that made its debut overseas. I believe that it did make its way to the US before being fatally knifed @ the AL vs LSU football game.

    Ok, so where is this going? You see, Nadler actually looks like a blimp. It shouldn’t be too hard to transfer Nadler’s mug & physique into an actually flying balloon form!

    If only there are a few affluent/innovative CONSERVATIVES out there to finance the creation of the Nadler Blimp/Balloon & have that bad boy hovering over the Crapitol building all during Nadler’s impeachment hearing!!

    How great would that be??

    LOOK!! Up in the sky! It’s a turd, it’s a Plane. NO, it’s the Nadler Blimp!!

    And if that enterprising party had the bucks, also do 1 of Pencil Neck, Pelosi, & even Hunted Biden along with a sign “I’m ready to testify”.

    Just imagine how absolutely grand that would be so see those clowns hovering over DC during this next round of sham-wow hearings.

    Liked by 8 people

    • Graham Pink says:

      You’re talking about The Stupid Party, few people in it thinks like that.
      IE, it’s too good of an idea to ever be acted upon.


    • Graham Pink says:

      You’re talking about The Stupid Party, few people in it thinks like that.
      IE, it’s too good of an idea to ever be acted upon.


    • todayistheday99 says:

      That same balloon also appeared and a secret fund raiser in Portola Valley, CA late September hosted by Scott McNealy former CEO of SUN Microsystems. Being independently wealthy seems to be a requirement if you’re a Trump supporter living in California.

      For example the former Intel CEO Brian Krzanich downward spiral that began in June 2016 when he suddenly cancels a Trump fundraiser at his Atherton home due to the uproar and certain backlash from a NYT article. Then in August 2017 after Charlottesville he pulls Intel out of the President’s American Manufacturing Council. Finally in June 2018 he resigns when it is discovered he previously (several years) had an afair with an employee which violated company policy.


    • Zippy says:

      “NO, it’s the Nadler Blimp!!”

      It’s huge material requirements and helium expense make it impractically expensive to build, a shame because its empty, gas filled head would be an accurate reproduction.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Thinker says:

      Look at the photo of his pants. Last time I saw a zipper that long it was on a sleeping bag!!

      Liked by 2 people

  3. Justin Green says:

    I’m glad the American Thinker article finally was written. I’m sure there are other similar articles, but it’s what I’ve been thinking the entire time.

    I know the article was posted above, or in another comment section, and couldn’t quickly find it again. But…

    The whole argument by Democrats – this time – is that the President is abusing his office for political gain, since Joe Biden is one of what is approaching 30 different Democrat candidates for office. Whatever law there is that prohibits a President from investigating his political opponents is in direct conflict with the Constitution which states that the President will uphold the laws of the land.

    It’s in direct conflict with the statutory requirements that require the President to exercise due diligence in making sure foreign aid does not get spent for corrupt purposes. It’s against the Ukraine-American treaty which requires the same.

    Unlike Muh Rushan Clooshun and UkraineGate, Joe Biden actually has provided probable cause for a criminal investigation into Biden as well as the entirety of the Ukraine desk and embassy at the State Department.

    Most actions taken by Presidents have the added benefit of helping the President politically. Therefore, here, running for office should not shield Joe Biden or his son from investigation. The group of laws outlawing corruption MUST prevail over any accusations of an abuse of power for political gain.

    The President can quid pro quo to get an investigation all day long as long as he has probable cause to do so.

    Further, the President can and should “obstruct” an illegal Muh Rushan Clushun investigation all day long as it is his job to make sure that the investigative powers of HIS BRANCH don’t violate the civil rights of American citizens.

    Liked by 4 people

    • These Congressmen, including Pelosi, Nadler, and Schiff, are pursuing their present actions, very specifically, to protect themselves. They, like the Bidens and the Obamas, are explicitly implicated in rampant corruption involving Ukraine, including the embezzlement of billions of dollars of American taxpayer money right back into their own pockets. (Most egregiously sent in the form of pallet-loads of $100 bills.)

      In Trump, they are faced for the first time with a POTUS of whom they cannot laughingly say, “Call him.”

      Likewise, in Zelenskyy, they are faced with a Ukranian president who was elected to “drain the swamp.”

      It is for this reason that they eagerly embrace the sayings of opportunistic Lawfare lawyers who are quick to write Bills of Attainder for them . . . so that they can restore the United States of America to its rightful place as the greatest center of Organized Crime the world has ever known, and they once more at the center of it.

      Liked by 11 people

      • YvonneMarie says:

        The Democrat Party is going to become extinct.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Rosemaryflower says:

        Exactly. Spot On.


      • Mike- great comments. I read the Lawfare Report that Sundance linked to and the first thing that crossed my mind was, don’t tell me that we Taxpayers paid for this piece of crap.
        Amazing that with all the scumbags who work with Schiffty, they still had to hire outside “talent” to do their dirty work.

        Liked by 1 person

        • glissmeister says:

          “Lawfare” has apparently decided to become conspirators in the apparent bad faith coup. Lawfare cohorts may not be as lawful as they apparently believe themselves to be. Perhaps Lawfare is an entity of sorts. Interesting questions remain about the entity, formal or informal, including questions about syndicate and cartel similarities.

          Lawfare appears to be a collaboration of sorts engaged in a form of commerce. No one engaged in commerce can lie, distort and misrepresent, or violate the commons, or the rights of others, with impunity. If they are lawyers are they not also officers of the court?

          Whatever persons comprise Lawfare, they seem to get some extent of their income or otherwise secure employment or professional station in part from their activities in politics, law and government, and in a real sense, sell their influence and opinion.

          Thus they may appear to monetize their political speech and political behavior.

          Commerce brings consequences.

          Liked by 1 person

      • dd_sc says:

        And once the money laundering scandal in Ukraine comes to light, start connecting the dots to other foreign aid packages – like Haiti; or even that Panama Papers scandal from a few years back.

        Liked by 3 people

    • Rowdyone says:

      So if one is immune from investigation simply because one is running for public office, as the Dims seem to be arguing, does that precedent mean we will soon be seeing most, if not all, of the coup conspirators running for office as well?

      Liked by 3 people

      • 55praises says:

        This begs the question, would not Donald Trump, running for president in 2015 and 2016 be immune from investigations by the same logic? You can’t have it both ways.

        Liked by 4 people

      • The Demon Slick says:

        President Trump is running for president. Shouldn’t he be enjoying the same protection that Biden gets? Aren’t the democrats abusing their office for their own political gain? They’re trying to dig up dirt on their political opponent. Clearly.

        Liked by 2 people

      • WRB says:

        em> immune from investigation simply because one is running

        I assume you know this is utter nonsense. The dems repeat ad nauseam their talking point until people assume it is true. Later, if that point is inconvenient (for example, if applied to VP Biden), the dems will articulate the exact opposite. There is no honor, no logic, no truth… just the convenient narrative.

        Liked by 2 people

  4. Got243kids says:

    This isn’t an impeachment, it’s a Crucifixion.

    Liked by 4 people

  5. Greg Dane says:

    LMAO so now it’s little Hitler’s (Nadler) turn to try and bring down the President. When will these wannabe dictators realize that they do NOT have the backing of the American public to pursue this obvious kangaroo court sham?

    Schitt for Brains and Little Hitler are the true epitome of everything that the democRAT party represents – liberal anti-American communist socialist progressives filled with hate, vitriol, division, anarchy and treason; who want to shred the Constitution, destroy the country and turn us into a third world despot country run by the likes of them.

    Ever wonder WHY they are so hell bent on dividing the nation and creating the hatred we see? Simple answer: they do not want to have THEIR high crimes and misdemeanors exposed to the world. Well, contrary to what they want they are pushing the nation to the point where WE THE PEOPLE will demand it be exposed and put an end to this debacle.

    Liked by 5 people

  6. Moe Grimm says:

    This is what it’s come to. Instead of celebrating all this president has accomplished mostly on his own and what would be to come next year in spite of the Uniparty – we look at a calendar like this. Let this sink in for a moment. Amazing. One question I have for those who sat home or voted ‘rat in the last midterm: “Are you happy with what you did?”

    Liked by 4 people

  7. DeVan says:

    Just imagine the lefts outrage if Republicans we’re engaged in a political stunt like this during the lead up to a major Muslim holiday…..

    Liked by 1 person

  8. TheShazDroid says:

    If Nadler tries to bring up Collusion with Russia it will be the BIGGEST gift ever to President Trump.

    The nation moved on from the Collusion Delusion when Mueller came up empty and I belive they moved on from Impeachment when the Democrats were unable to get anyone across the isle to join and then when you toss is the bunker testimony everyone sees it as a partisan witchhunt.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Rowdyone says:

      Given that impeachment is just one more attempt to get Trump since day one of his presidency I think the people understand this vendetta. You can only “cry wolf” so many times before people ignore you.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Rosemaryflower says:

        This derangement is a drug. It is actually rather concerning, and a national security risk.
        I do know, bc I have friends in various parts of Europe and Asia, that this is all quite embarrassing, this horrid behavior from the liberals in our country. They are truly bullies.
        Anyway, We have many in this country that still thrive on this drug and they will never let go, no matter how many times or how many ways they want to show their angry angry state. They are like slugs and leave a trail

        Liked by 2 people

        • WRB says:

          They are truly bullies.

          Yes, the dems are slowly working their way up to being true “brown shirts,” where bullying graduates to violence and tyranny. In real-time, we are watching the birth of a fascist ideology.

          I have wondered what it was like to have lived through the rise of the nazi party in 1930’s Germany, and how it was possible for an entire society to go off the rails. I still do not know how it is possible, but we are seeing the same thing now, here in the US.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Rosemaryflower says:

            My parents were born and raised in the Netherlands.
            My dad, he never noticed or thought much about it.
            My mother and her parents, they were aware very early, the 1930’s
            My mom told me that everyone listened, no one said anything or commented on stuff
            that they disagreed with. By the time my mom was in her late teens, 1939, the Nazi types were infiltrating nice neighborhoods. Kind of like NOW. Shutting down alternate views, Jewish people, or those that sympathised with them. So basically no one said anything.
            By 1942, my mom was already hard at work underground helping hide jews and transporting families the hell out of Holland.
            My dad was taken up in a Nazi Razzia in 43 and taken to northern Germany.
            Long story. Mom and dad did not know each other then. they met in 1946 at a Christian Youth gathering in Rotterdam, where they lived about 5 miles apart.
            I still have my daddy. I take care of him every day. He is 96 now.

            Liked by 1 person

  9. thedoc00 says:

    As with the “Mueller Report”, the Schiff Crypt and Clown Show report was written within the first few weeks of the Crypt Sessions start. The media already has their copy.

    Plus, the democrats already have their copies of the Mueller Grand Jury Materials, which are being leaked used to set up Nadler version of the Schiff Show and will soon be leaked to the media.

    Nadler is likely to call members of Mueller’s team as the key witnesses of his clown parade.

    Liked by 2 people

    • thedoc00 says:

      The questions will be oh so cleverly disguised versions of the Mueller Grand Jury Materials (//sarc), with questions asking for the legal opinions of Mueller’s staff and possibly other “legal expert panel”s.

      Liked by 2 people

  10. hokkoda says:

    Nice metaphor, but I would argue that the horse was stolen by the horse theft cartel run by the previous town sheriff. The dirty cops tried to frame the new sheriff for the crimes of the old. Having failed at this, they are now prosecuting the new sheriff for discussing this on the phone with the sheriff of a neighboring village which is overrun with stolen horses.

    Liked by 2 people

  11. In the Land of Poz says:

    ” framed for stealing a horse … accused of trying too hard to avoid hanging for it. … Mueller eventually conceded that Trump didn’t steal the horse; … focused on Trump’s efforts to avoid the hanging. Eventually Mueller testified … there was never a horse to begin with… ”

    The best summary I have seen (and one of the funniest) of the pretzel logic of Mueller and MSM is ObstructionGate by CJ Hopkins. It reads like an absurdist parody while being a literally correct statement of the media events of the past 3 years.

    “The investigation was never about Trump colluding with Russia. It was always about Trump obstructing the investigation of the collusion with Russia that the investigation was not about. Mueller was never looking for collusion. It was not his job to look for collusion. His job was to look for obstruction of his investigation of alleged obstruction of his investigation of non-collusion, which he found, and detailed at length in his report, and which qualifies as an impeachable offense.
    The fact that it didn’t prove “collusion” means nothing — that’s just a straw man argument that Trump and his Russian handlers make. The goal all along was to prove that Trump obstructed an investigation of his obstruction of that investigation, not that he was “colluding” with Putin, or any of the other paranoid nonsense that the corporate media were forced to report on, once an investigation into his obstruction of the investigation was launched.”



    Here’s hoping the Bomb Cyclone hits directly on Schitt, Nadler and Mumbles Pelosi !!!! May it take a direct hit on the offices of Lawfare members, not just in the form of weather, but in pure public exposure and legal consequences!!!

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Guido Strata says:

    Nadler the Futz needs to be told to “F-OFF” in the strongest, most guttural terms possible!

    Liked by 1 person

  14. czarowniczy says:

    One of those random thought bubbles floated to the top last night regarding the HSPCI’s involvement in this. We’ve had the 3-letter intel agencies actively involved ion this coup since Day One, whenever the evidence pool seems to dry up a brand new shiny accusation, all prepared for the table pops up.

    My mind went back to the late 90s when Gary Webb stumbled over the CIA/Contra/cocaine connection in southern California. The media treated Webb as a darling, showering him with awards until a sudden attack not on his story but on him personally was launched by the MSM. There were attacks all lining up, information provided by anonymous sources and put on the front pages of major newspapers, many of these outlets well known to have sweetheart relations with the Beltway intel agencies.

    The attack wasn’t on his stories, it was an ad hominem attack designed to discredit his story by ruining him. Matter of fact a 400+ page report on the CIA’s involvement in Contra-related drug pushing was released arguably backing Webb’s stories but was ignored as it was released during the Clinton impeachment clown show.

    Maybe it’s a too-much-turkey hangover but the similarities – especially the Wa-Po’s involvement, makes me wonder. Did our POTUS in his swamp-clearing activities rankle the same Deep State powers that Webb did? Are the same 3-letter Beltway folks now engaged in the removal of yet another threat to their backstage machinations? Even though the evidence that could smoke them out is being gathered for dissemination will it see light in time for it to do any good or, as with Webb’s works, will it die in plain sight, smothered by a campaign of unrelated smears?


  15. Fools Gold says:

    If I were POTUS I’d show read an opening statement similar to the opening paragraph in Sundance’s post, give all the D’s a really good cussing, and walk out flipping them all the bird.


  16. James F says:

    “I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a nothingburger today!l

    Liked by 3 people

  17. Jim in TN says:

    Quite a disconnect. I have been reading all these editorials about how the dems are searching for an exit of this mess they have put themselves in, but here they are rushing to make it worse.

    It is like listening to all of Nancy’s pronouncements on how impeachment wasn’t on the table while she committed four committees to do nothing but investigate the President and wrote perverted rules to deny Republicans and the President any defense, and demanded they deliver by mid April.

    So many pundits have been using Nancy’s words to hide Nancy’s actions. Yet did any apologize when Nancy rushed Schiffpeachment? Are any going to apologize for telling us it is all over when it isn’t? Democrat insanity is no excuse. It should be the starting point of any analysis.

    Now they are rushing Naddlepeachment. Rushing in hopes of being able to get it done before it falls apart? Or are they trying to get it done by some insane predetermined date in their insane plan to impeach at all costs?

    I have seen no analysis that shows this to be a good thing for Democrats, yet here they are doing it no matter what. I even think it would be better for them to drag out impeachment investigations throughout the primaries, using it to get all sorts of dirt on Trump to use in the general election, then holding a censure vote if they can’t turn the public against the President.

    But who am I to gainsay bad dentures, bug eyes and waddles? I have never even tried to win an election.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Censure is their best bet at this point,….not that it’s even remotely warranted, but it’s their only way of getting out of the corner they’ve painted themselves into and still somewhat appease the agitated morons of their base who’s votes they’ll need next year.

      Liked by 2 people

  18. mikeyboo says:

    Sundance, your summation of the story of “The Horse Thief Who Wasn’t” would make a great feature length cartoon. You could make millions!!!! and retiree to Mar a Lago!!!

    Liked by 1 person

  19. Bit Coyne says:

    A wonderful fantasy that I have. The next Democratic President, a solid Republican House.
    An impeachment vote, yes, the 1st day congress is in session after the swearing -in. Constitution doesn’t say high crimes an misdemeanors “while in office”
    For Michele Obama it would be her book deals, corruptly profiteering from political office.
    I can dream can’t I?

    Liked by 1 person

  20. Bit Coyne says:

    POTUS needs to set up a Golf Day, with Tiger and Nicklaus the day of the Impeachment vote.

    Liked by 1 person

  21. Soy Manbun says:

    But are the suburban soccer moms happy with their democrat midterm vote?
    It’s all about the feelz, ya feel me.


  22. atomichillbilly says:

    Dumbocrats: “this is how we’ll persecute everyone we don’t like if we ever regain power “.

    Voters: we’ll pass.

    The dumbocrats are the tyrants our grandparents warned us about.


  23. atomichillbilly says:

    Dumbocrats: “this is how we’ll persecute everyone we don’t like if we ever regain power “.

    Voters: we’ll pass.

    The dumbocrats are the tyrants our grandparents warned us about.


  24. ChampagneReady says:

    I hope one of the Republican HJC members has already been assigned to rack up and play the numerous YouTube hypocrite videos of Nadler vehemently decrying Clinton’s impeachment.

    Not only will it be effective and embarrassing beyond belief to Nadler, he looks like the Goodyear Blimp in the videos.


  25. Mncpo(ret) says:

    Another time line:
    3-7 Dec. Ads are running now for “casualty” actors to be able to “show their talent” related to a catastrophic event during this time period, they’re all over social media. By the way, you can earn $600.00 per day.

    9 Dec. IG report drops.

    10 Dec. President Trump holds a rally in Hershey PA.

    11 Dec. Howoritz testifies in front of the Senate Committee.

    Connect the dots.


  26. tballard56 says:

    What date does the shooting start? I did not see that on the calendar.


  27. If this sham is allowed to not only continue, but work, it won’t matter who takes office, the People’s Voice will officially be dead…we will know at that moment who is for a continuation of the Constitution or the overthrow that this is.


  28. 1911pistolero says:

    How long will Patriots continue to sit on their hands. Enough is enough. Where’s the Supreme Court. This needs to be stopped before the Boogaloo becomes reality. Why are progressives pushing so hard for a war they will lose?


  29. WY Farmer's Wife says:

    LOVE the “spoof” at the beginning of the article!!


  30. Pingback: Adam Schiff Will Give Democrat Intel Committee Members Only 24 Hours to Sign Off on Impeachment Report - That Will Include Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax

  31. Bart says:

    But, since he did once curse at the Mayor, he deserves hanging. Right? Why is he complaining about being framed for horse thieving? He should be grateful he wasn’t framed for raping the Mayor’s daughter. He should remorsefully accept the hanging and be grateful his entire village wasn’t immediately burned to the ground with everyone in it.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s