James Comey Under Investigation – John Huber Investigating Comey Memos – Declaration Release This Week…

Jumpin’ ju-ju bones, there’s big news in here.  Actual Bombshells! For real Tick Tocks and much much more….

Former acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker appeared on Fox News to discuss the replacement of Dan Coats with John Ratcliffe as head of the ODNI, and the current status of AG Bill Barr’s ongoing reviews into prior DOJ and FBI (mis)conduct.

Whitaker posits the placement of Ratcliffe as looking at the aggregate intelligence apparatus and seeing if there “are systemic issues and failures for how the investigations were kicked-off”; and the engagements with other countries (FBI and CIA).

Additionally Whitaker summarizes U.S. Attorney John Durham as focused on the origin of the intelligence operation against candidate Trump and “prosecuting anyone that needs to be prosecuted“.  [By the way, that seems to confirm Durham as an official “investigation”, not a “review”.]

Then comes the BOMBSHELL…. (@01:26 below) while seemingly not realizing what he just said, Whitaker outlines U.S. Attorney John Huber as reviewing “anything related to Comey’s memos and the like.”  Boom… There it is.

THAT finally explains why the DOJ is fighting the release of the David Archey declarations in the FOIA lawsuit by CNN.  [Listen carefully at 01:26 of the interview]

.

Until that obscure comment, likely a slip that not many would catch, there has been no valid explanation by the DOJ about any investigation of the Comey memos, which would also encompass the “Archey Declarations”.

If U.S. Attorney John Huber is indeed looking at those Comey memos, that would explain why the DOJ is fighting the release of the Archey Declarations in the DC Circuit Court with Judge James E Boasberg.  Now it makes sense.  That little obscure comment by Whitaker is a big effen’ deal.

Oddly, and, well, conspicuously, the DOJ has never said they were investigating the Comey Memos as an argument in their legal position in the FOIA case. That specific -albeit innocuous- statement by Whitaker (interview above) is the first indication therein.

It sounds like the DOJ is keeping that investigation of Comey’s Memo content hidden, but Whitaker just let it slip.

With that new information; and if it is a fact that U.S. Attorney John Huber is investigating James Comey; CTH will now reverse our position on the release of the Archey Declarations and support their non-release.

In our opinion the content of the diary by former FBI Director James Comey, as outlined in what has formally been called “The Comey Memos”, is devastating to the FBI.

How do we know? Because the DOJ/FBI is fighting like hell to keep even descriptions of the memo(s) content from becoming public.  Now it appears that diary is being reviewed by U.S. Attorney John Huber.

THAT MEANS…. FBI Director James Comey is under investigation.

BACKSTORY – In the background of what was The Mueller Investigation, there was a FOIA case where the FBI was fighting to stop the release of the Comey memos.

Within that courtroom fight Mueller’s lead FBI agent David Archey wrote a series of declarations to the court describing the content of the memos and arguing why they should be kept classified.

The FOIA fight shifted.

The plaintiff, CNN, argued for public release of the content of the FBI agent’s descriptions, now known as the “Archey Declarations”.

After a lengthy back-and-forth legal contest, on June 7th Judge James E Boasberg agreed to allow the FBI to keep the Comey memo content hidden, but instructed the DOJ/FBI to release the content of the Archey Declarations.

On July 5th, the U.S. Department of Justice -under Attorney General Bill Barr- while waiting until the last minute (28 days since court order), filed a motion [full pdf below] to block the release of the Archey Declarations, despite the June 7th judicial order.

On July 19th, CNN filed a motion against the FBI and DOJ to force the release of the Archey Declarations (full pdf below), and enforce the order.

On July 25th, the DOJ filed a response requesting more time to reply. The DOJ is currently asking for more time, a delay until August 2nd, to file a response to a supportive motion from CNN that would force the DOJ to release the “Archey Declarations” [detailed explanations of what’s inside the Comey Memos].

The DOJ wants these declarations hidden.  Now we know why.

Here’s the last motion from CNN which demands the DOJ and FBI to comply with the prior ruling of June 7th, (embed pdf belowcloud pdf link here):

.

The DOJ is requested more time, August 2nd, 2019, to respond to the CNN motion.

CNN wants the June 7th ruling enforced and the Archey Declarations, which describe the content of the Comey memos, released.

David Archey was the FBI lead agent on Robert Mueller’s team. Archey replaced Peter Strzok when Strzok was removed. Yes, Archey’s declarations might possibly describe material evidence the DOJ are using in ongoing matters. However, THIS IS IMPORTANT – the DOJ and FBI have never made that assertion in their court arguments.

Despite the original media FOIA lawsuit coming from CNN -vs- DOJ, there is no-one in the MSM covering this story. Here is the July 5th DOJ filing:

.

Here’s the background on the June 7th, 2019, ruling as we shared at the time:

Judge Boasberg was deciding what could be publicly released, meaning current redactions removed, based on two connected events: (#1) The content of the Comey Memos; and (#2) the declarations of lead FBI agent for Robert Mueller’s special counsel, David Archey, in describing those memos. CNN had filed a lawsuit to gain full access.

[Note: the descriptions of the Comey memos by FBI agent David Archey are known as the “Archey Declarations” – Read Here.]

For those who may not be aware, there are so many memos (dozens) when assembled they seem to make up an actual diary of moment-by-moment events, during the FBI investigation of Donald Trump, as documented by FBI Director James Comey.

♦ In the issue of the redactions within the Comey Memos, the judge doesn’t remove them. Some are ordered to be removed, some are approved to stay in place. The Comey memo aspect, and the redaction decision, is basically a splitting of the baby 50/50. It will be interesting, but meh, maybe not too much detail. – CNN ARTICLE

(Pdf Link)

The issues argued by the FBI lawyers to keep the Comey memos hidden surround sources and methods. The judge generally agreed to the potential for compromise, but also outlined several sections of redactions within the Comey memos where that argument doesn’t hold up. [The judge has read the fully unredacted memo content.]

♦ However, on the issue of the Archey Declarations there’s an opportunity for some very interesting information to surface. Here’s an example of currently existing redactions within the Archey Declarations:

And stunningly, yes, STUNNINGLY, Judge Boasberg ordered the Archey declarations to be fully released to the public WITHOUT REDACTIONS. See pages 34 and 35 of the ruling.

That means all those black boxes in the example above will be removed and CNN will be allowed the fully unredacted content of the declarations by FBI Agent David Archey.

CTH remained very interested.

The Comey Memos cut to the heart of the issues Special Counsel Robert Mueller said were outside his purview. The Comey Memos describe the FBI operation and intent during the 2016 election. The Archey Declarations describe the Comey Memos.

The content could be very revealing.

Now that we know U.S. Attorney John Huber is tasked with investigating the Comey Memos, it finally makes sense why the DOJ are fighting to keep the material hidden.

However….. HERE’S ANOTHER BOOM…..  Perhaps, just perhaps, this is part of the declassification material that will be released on Wednesday July 31st, per Joe diGenova.   If you look at the timeline and the court deadlines it makes sense.

Judge Boasberg ruled the Archey Declarations must be released.  The DOJ has requested additional responsive timing until August 2nd.  Perhaps either the unredacted Archey Declarations, or… jumpin ju-ju bones, dare I hope….  the actual unredacted Comey Memos might be what Bill Barr is about to release.

It’s likely Joe diGenova has no idea what the material is; however, perhaps this is what Joe diGenova’s DOJ and FBI sources are alluding to.  It all does make sense.

Your thoughts?

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, CIA, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, FBI, IG Report FISA Abuse, Legislation, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Russia, THE BIG UGLY, TowerGate, Tripwires, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

857 Responses to James Comey Under Investigation – John Huber Investigating Comey Memos – Declaration Release This Week…

  1. Bogeyfree says:

    I wonder if Sundance would consider keeping this thread on top for another 24 hours as THIS is what everyone IMO wants to talk about.

    Just a suggestion so it doesn’t get buried too fast.

    Liked by 12 people

  2. Baby El says:

    Should we be so naive to believe comey is the only one with a complete diary of events?

    Liked by 2 people

    • Bogeyfree says:

      IMO, the diary sits within the NSA gathered communications center going as far back as possibly 2009.

      The real question IMO is whether Barr and the Boys are willing to go there to prove this may have been a 2 Part Plan all along?

      Liked by 3 people

    • Judith says:

      Gee, if I were part of a conspiracy to overthrow our Constitutional Republic and deliver the USA to a Totalitarian New World Order, I would cover my tracks, not leave a diary or expose’ to document my crimes. But that’s just me.

      Is this “diary” a devil-made-me-do-it attempt at CYA? Was Comey locked in a tower hoping for his prince to come to the rescue?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Baby El says:

        Reasons…
        #1 To note justification for his actions – eg: was directed to based on ‘solid’ intelligence from “others”.
        #2 Insurance to prevent being thrown under the bus or committing involuntary suicide.

        Liked by 3 people

        • dd_sc says:

          3. Evidence for a plea bargain.

          Like

        • dd_sc says:

          I like that #1.

          Sometimes I wonder how many of the small group are just dupes being manipulated by some bigger DOJ or CIA fish. Play ball, or we’ll ruin you scenario.

          Rosenstein and Bruce Orh may fall into that category.

          Like

      • Truth seeker says:

        She was never supposed to lose.

        Liked by 4 people

      • gueppebarre says:

        He made a diary and kept it so when Hillary won he could go to her, stick in his thumb, pull out a plum, and say, “What a good boy am I!”
        When she lost, they began using these as “clandestine” materials with which to convict Trump of wrongdoing in the court of public opinion (“I have EVIDENCE, but I can’t show it to you…”). He didn’t figure Trump correctly, though, and now those “memos” just put his tit in the proverbial wringer. Ruh-row.

        Like

      • kevin says:

        They were arrogant enough not to bother hiding incriminating evidence too deeply because never in a million years was Hillary going to lose the Presidency.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Gary Lacey says:

      I believe the diary was a mistake, remember, Hilliary was going to win, Comey wouldn’t need cover for treason, the mistake is Comey’s, he didn’t have to reveal he kept memos, it was supposed to be Comey’s insurance policy, it may hang him!

      Like

    • Richard Orberson says:

      Clapper , Brennam, and Obama are over Comey in the mess

      Liked by 1 person

  3. dwpender says:

    Folks, I regret to suspect that we are making WAY too much of this offhanded comment by Whitaker. I’ll be not just surprised, but shocked, if Huber’s operation indicts a single person.

    I still say, declassify it all NOW, and let the chips fall where they may.

    Liked by 6 people

    • As appealing as that may be, dwpender, this would actually prevent criminal prosecution, because no juror could be found who though the accused might be innocent. (Never mind the obvious fact that they aren’t.)

      I am actually very, very confident that this does lead to many criminal indictments. But remember that these can only be generated by a Grand Jury, which operates in complete secrecy. Barr now has complete authority to compel cooperation and to release classified information to whom he pleases, and I think that’s mainly going to be (at least for now) “to a Grand Jury.” No one knows that a Grand Jury is convened, nor who they are considering, nor if they handed down an indictment until that indictment is unsealed.

      Frustrating though this obviously is to all of us, I believe that this is the way it must be, and that our expectations of criminal sentences will not be frustrated. There is simply too much blatant criminality coming out now.

      Liked by 6 people

      • David says:

        I agree wholeheartedly, and as tempting as it is to be skeptical, I choose to put my faith in God and Donald Trump ( how I enjoy that phrase ) to get to the bottom of this, and to work on our behalf as part of a people who love truth and care about justice. Wisdom is justified of her children, and The Donald has shown himself to be very astute in his moves against the deep state, no doubt with divinely provided insight and protection that conjures images of Wiley coyote and the roadrunner. There is no question in anyone’s mind who will win that battle, in either the former or the latter. Just because I’m pulling my hair out for months unending, it doesn’t challenge that one fact

        Liked by 9 people

      • islandpalmtrees says:

        I do wonder, what is too much blatant criminality for a criminal enterprise? I would have thought the Clinton Foundation scandal would have been enough or perhaps the FISA warrant abuse.

        What holds a criminal enterprise in check when the law is what I say it is today? Who is left to say, “How much is to much”.

        Like

      • Eric Doll says:

        “.. would actually prevent criminal prosecution, because no juror could be found who though the accused might be innocent. (Never mind the obvious fact that they aren’t.)

        And this is why “The Law Is A nAss”. Why shouldn’t it be recognized that potential jurors have a right to know as much about the case as they are inclined to learn – not only what the almighty court decides they should be told? There is too much manipulation of juries – the selection should be random and 10 out 12 required to convict. Such a system would have its faults but would put an end to the lawyer shenanigans re. selecting malleable jurors and then leaving them little chance to know all the relevant evidence, however sourced.

        Like

    • GB Bari says:

      I can understand your doubt just as easily as accepting the possibility that Whitaker meant what he said.

      However consider this. Whitaker has “lived, ate, slept, and breathed this stuff” for many months… even a year or longer. And he is, by all indications, a professional. He knows what’s going on to a large degree because it is part of his daily world.

      To make a casual “offhanded comment” that has significant consequence like that is not how he or any of those in his world are trained and conditioned. Up to now Whitaker has not struck anyone that I’ve seen commenting here as being careless with his spoken words. To the contrary, he seems to be cautious and selective.

      That’s why one commenter earlier in this thread asked the possibility of this “offhanded remark” being deliberately and strategically planned to be spoken in this interview. And Sundance agreed having the same thought.

      Liked by 7 people

      • Lefty says:

        I disagree. Whitaker has shown a loose tongue and a combative nature before.
        Have you forgotten the whole “Mr. Chairman, I see your 5 minutes is up!” answer he gave while under testimony?

        I’m not sure what to make of his recent comments. I thought Whitaker left the DOJ shortly after Barr came on board?!? Pretty sure he left the DOJ back in March. I’m not sure he would still be privy to any inside investigations and the deep dark goings on in the DOJ or with inside info on what Huber/Durham are doing at this point……

        I’m hopeful, but will not be surprised if this doesn’t pan out.

        Like

        • GB Bari says:

          Loose tongue? Combative nature?

          Please cite at least one clear example of his having a “loose tongue.”

          As to his “combative nature” (in the hearing to which your are referring) his remark that you quoted was IMHO entirely appropriate given the way he had been treated and the ridiculous manner in which the committee chairman was running the “inquisition”. I myself would have been equally as frustrated (probably even more so) with the blatant hard political/ideological bias against me by the DemoncRATs, and would have at some point made a sarcastic remark, only mine would probably not been half as witty as Whitaker’s. Whitaker’s stock went up 20% in my mind after that exquisitely timed and perfectly contextual remark.

          Liked by 5 people

          • LandonK says:

            agreed, to me it only enhanced his position in all of this.

            Like

            • MelH says:

              I’m wondering why every perp isn’t afforded the privilege of writing his perspective and having everyone read it. The “memos” are probably parts of Comey’s self-aggrandizing book, his view of Trump as a Russian Asset. Is the judge going to give everyone equal time to hand in their version of reality? Why should we taxpayers pay for the judge’s time reading Comey’s drivel? Have you EVER heard of this happening in any other case? Why aren’t you outraged?

              Like

          • LandonK says:

            agreed, to me it only enhanced his position in all of this.

            Liked by 1 person

          • LULU says:

            GBB, I watched that hearing live. Whitaker’s remark was exactly right, on target. They were treating him very badly. Too many want our people to just be nice and watch their manners…

            A big LIKE…

            Liked by 4 people

    • Zy says:

      So you’re saying multiple persons?

      Like

    • Orville R. Bacher says:

      In a sane world, preventing the release of the Archer Declarations would constitute Obstruction of Justice.

      Like

    • Mike says:

      Who put CNN up to requesting the documents? Sounds like Comey and his henchmen are trying to find out what is happening. If CNN is behind the release, look for the hidden agenda.

      Liked by 3 people

  4. A cynic might ask, How long does it take John Huber to look at Comey’s memos? If he has been stonewalled by Wray or Coates or whomever, what has he been doing after each 9:00am call over coffee to be told, “Nope, not today”?

    Like

  5. Pristach says:

    If you really want to understand the sophisticated criminal mind, watch James Comey’s testimonies.

    Huber had this information long ago but did not act until Barr and Durham showed up.

    Cautiously optimistic

    Liked by 3 people

    • We’ve all said that “this is payback time.” And, it is. But not so much for the President as for the Intelligence and the Justice communities – who have been forced to live with the certain knowledge that their institutions (which they live and breathe …) were being used to commit high crimes.

      Why do you think that William Barr(!) returned as Attorney General, being only the second person in American history to do so? A man who loves the law, and who came from the CIA, and who is a smart, aggressive bulldog who could and did out-fox the Lawfare lawyers. This was no accident. Someone asked him to do it [again]. And he knew exactly what would be facing him. He accepted anyway.

      Liked by 5 people

      • I’m not sure I necessarily agree with your characterization of Barr based on his history with Iran Contra, and when the govt. stole and disseminated software, leading to the bankrupting of the company they stole it from.
        That being said, he’s our best hope right now.

        Like

    • Bad Bill Barr says:

      These different groups are working together collaboratively so there is
      bound to some coordination. At some future point we’ll get an accurate
      sense of movement, but likely not until, before the pieces start moving.

      Like

  6. saintoil says:

    All are patriots here, good people. No one is disgruntled without cause. I sat myself down the other day and told myself….ignore the Democrap screeches, turn off the noise for even a couple of days ..how did I feel last year after loosing the house and Session residing in the DOJ? Pretty damn frustrated. Fast forward to today. Mueller’s witch hunt shown for the scam it was. Economy good, VSG seems to be on the offensive. Until Durham’s hand is shown I am hopeful. I am well aware their is a limit to what the faithful will tolerate. As a country we cannot move on until this is dealt with. Rule of law is dead post Hillary and coup plotters.

    Liked by 12 people

  7. Bogeyfree says:

    Don’t forget that there are now other, outside the DOJ lawsuits popping up where key people ARE GOING to be subpoenaed and put under oath which will expose elements of Part B (the Russia Collusion coverup and frame job of PT)

    Barr knows this.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. TradeBait says:

    Now that we know what we know – the timeline for resolution is much faster than it normally would be for investigations of this type. We have been impatient because we smell the mountain of garbage, Turns out the crew has been cleaning it up chunks at a time before they bring in the heavy equipment to sweep it clean.

    Liked by 2 people

  9. Louisiana Tea Rose says:

    Every move by Barr has a specific purpose. The one that REALLY got my attention was his decision to reinstate the federal death penalty last week.

    Them thar warnt no idle words…..

    Liked by 12 people

  10. mr.piddles says:

    So interesting little timing here. Whitaker popped up late last week on some Fox show to comment on the Mueller testimony and related stuff. Thought to myself: “Huh. Haven’t seen or heard from this guy in a long time… why is he showing up now?”. Few days later he drops some Popcorn Kernels in this new interview. Strange timing is all. I mean Whitaker’s been invisible until now, right?

    If you think about it… when (IF!) the DOJ starts disclosing stuff, they’ll need Media Faces to be the conduits of information and explanation. CNN and its panel of 387 Political Analysts ain’t gonna do it. Rachel Madcow ain’t gonna do it. Hannity on his own will test one’s patience. So, practically speaking, Barr may need/want some sort of “disclosure team” that sits on top of the overall facts-only DOJ/FBI Public Relations. Maybe? Or do I just have images of Popcorn popping in my head?

    Liked by 7 people

    • Lefty says:

      It was widely reported that Whitaker left the DOJ back in March of 2019, when Barr came on board.

      I find it strange that this is the guy the DOJ now trots out to drop crumbs?!?

      Like

      • Payday says:

        Seems perfect to me. As an acting AG during this, he has built in credibility.

        Like

      • Tl Howard says:

        Maybe Fox is trotting him out, not Barr.They know a bunch of stuff is going to be coming out in the next day, weeks, months and they’re trying to find if they can use him as their “expert” about the DOJ, the FBI, etc.

        Like

    • Drogers says:

      mr. piddles –

      After considerable internal deliberation that’s where I came down.

      Guy hasn’t been around for six months and suddenly he’s back on TV. I’m thinking a slow roll out to prepare the citizens for the MOAB’s (or at least a nice 💯 pounder). Much as Soloman and Joe informing the interested public, last week and yesterday, through different media outlets and forums.

      * Or maybe I have images of 🍿 in my head an such

      Liked by 2 people

    • Bob says:

      Wasn’t Huber appointed by Sessions to investigate but did nothing for a year?

      Like

  11. Michael Hennessy says:

    . . . or just another head fake (chum) to keep the little people quiet!

    Liked by 1 person

  12. In 2016, the Intelligence and Justice communities emerged from the control of a vicious and obsessed President – (and he seemed like a colorless [no pun …] person, but basically an okay guy) – and watched as his former staff launched an aggressive attack on his successor. Then they watched him survive the attack, playing them all like so many pawns in a chess game. A strong Attorney General known to all of them returned to his post. Everyone now knew that this was the moment they had long been waiting for.

    And the perpetrators are beginning to understand that this is the moment they had long feared. For all this time they’ve been camping on the beach, not looking out to sea. Now they are about to be overtaken by a giant orange tidal wave. And all those staffers who they had forced to commit crimes on their behalf, and the directors such as Adm. Rogers who were men and women of integrity, are surfing the leading edge of it.

    No, “this is the real deal,” folks. This is going to happen, now. Grab your popcorn and enjoy.

    Liked by 13 people

    • warrprin1 says:

      And all God’s children said, AMEN. Thank you, MRob.

      Liked by 5 people

    • cali says:

      @Mike Robinson: ^^^^^^^^^This!

      One major blockade running interference not releasing the docs and their declassification was Dan Coats – the holdover of the coup plotters. He is out ergo the flow can now start in earnest.

      Lastly – word has it that it was none other Dan Coats who wrote the anonymous op-ed last year in the NYT working inside the wire resisting. So yeah – it makes lot of sense.

      I hold off on Gina Haspel who was the CIA station chief in 2016 when all this went down so she has also a big motive to gum up the declassification.

      August is known as the ‘hot’ month and it will get really hot now as the congress critters are on vacation and the DOJ/Durham/Huber have to floor.
      No wonder Pelosi and Cummings are in Italy trying to stop co-operation with the 5Eyes members although as the Italian leader loudly stated that he is with president Trump. He gave a great speech putting Merkel, Macron and Juncker out to pasture.

      The declassification is now in progress to move forward all-the-while congress is on vacation!

      Brennan and Comey have already been indicted by the grand juries and I wouldn’t be surprised if they are the first ones being arrested.

      One more thing that appears strange: Both Hussein and Michelle both silently deleted and erased/cleansed their twitter and other social media accounts that had anything to do with HRC including messages sent by her. It appears these two know something big is dropping involving HRC.

      Liked by 4 people

      • But remember: “declassification is purposeful,” and Barr has been granted the authority not only to select what is to be declassified, but where to send it. I personally do not expect him to send much of it, if any, “to the general public.” Not until indictments have been sworn out and unsealed, and quite possibly not until trials have commenced. (This hypothesis is based on Court standards concerning pre-trial disclosures.) If the Grand Juries have seen indisputable information that no one in the public has yet seen, then it will be very difficult to say that they were biased. The authors who want to write New York Times® Best Sellers will simply have to wait a little while longer. 😀

        Right now there are enough known Federal investigations, all under Barr’s watchful eye, and enough private lawsuits, to ensure that “Payback Time™ Is Coming.” The grand conspiracy is unraveling, and it’s the people who work inside the Intelligence and Justice communities who are driving the bus. Judges have been given cases to try and rulings to make. Honest Admirals have been given digital proof of crimes and the ability to act against them – and honorably did so.

        (Now, honest victims wait for their names to be cleared …)

        Liked by 1 person

      • Robert Smith says:

        What you saw about the O’bama’s twitter is interesting but why would they do that? Surely people of their stature has all their tweets saved by someone in their audience making if not by technology.

        Like

  13. Suzanne says:

    I would really like it if we got all of them but if we only get one I want it to be Brennan

    Liked by 7 people

  14. StanH says:

    I do believe that Bill Barr knew what he was getting into by taking the job as a AG. He also understands that with President Trump he’s not kidding. He has always been a believer in giving as good as he gets. Deep state took their best shot ie Mueller Investigation and they wiffed. Now comes President Trump and you had better believe he’s coming, as that has been his MO his entire career which spans decades.

    When Whittaker appeared on news shows he knew what he was saying. These people are immersed in public speaking double talk. A US Attorney spends their whole lives being cagey and closed mouthed. He would not have reached that level with loose lips. So I agree with Sundance this was for effect. We’ll soon see.

    Liked by 3 people

  15. islandpalmtrees says:

    Why would the “The plaintiff, CNN, argued for public release of the content of the FBI agent’s descriptions, now known as the “Archey Declarations”.” released unless they had reason to believe their contents would favored Comey or the Socialist?

    What would you do, if you were the Judge on this case and you realized that the summary represented by “Archey Declarations” differed from the actual Comey Memos by allot?

    Would it depend upon your political point of view?

    Like

    • mr.piddles says:

      “unless they had reason to believe their contents would favored Comey or the Socialist?”

      TDS. Manifests itself in irrational, often self-destructive thoughts and actions. Terrible, terrible affliction.

      I think CNN thinks they know what’s in the memos, based on Comey’s self-indulgent book and interviews. But I don’t think they actually know what’s in ALL the memos. So they’re in for a big suprise, IMO. Comey’s not stupid enough to NOT CYA in advance of the whole operation (inevitably) going south. James B. Comey is loyal to James B. Comey… not the DOJ, not the FBI, not the Obama Administration, not John Brennan, etc. etc.

      ‘Course CNN et al will latch on to the 2 or 3 “incriminating” paragraphs vis a vis Trump interactions out of dozens and dozens of pages of motes. So we need indictments first and Comey Memos later. Indictments first would make it very difficult for the MSM to spin the memos after the fact.

      Liked by 6 people

      • dawg says:

        Exactly. They think they know whats in them but they dont. At the same time, Comey knows that SOME of what is in them is NOW incriminating, which is why he didnt just tell CNN himself. My theory anyway

        Liked by 1 person

      • Cam Heck says:

        Can someone remind who HAS seen the Comey memos already? Nunes? Ratcliffe?

        Like

    • Louisiana Tea Rose says:

      CNN toadies know what’s coming. And they will try to rehabilitate themselves as best they can.

      I think this goes to that effort. Mueller last week was the final nail in the “get Trump” coffin.

      Liked by 3 people

  16. f says:

    How are Connecticut or Utah Grand Juries possible where no aspects of the crime were committed there?DiGeneva keeps referring to them.

    https://www.lucianne.com/2019/07/30/the_deep_state_apoplectic_overbrthe_appointment_of_john_ratcliffebras_dni__for_good_reason_11204.html.

    DOJ Manual says DOJ attorney should not impanel grand juries in a district other than where the crime was committed. Are there exemptions to this rule.?
    Statutorily speaking the venue privilege only attaches to trials not grand juries.
    My research provides no further answers.

    If the Grand jury must be convened in DC maybe Durham is so strong that he can intimidate the grand jurors. He only needs 12 out of 23 grand jurors to indict. Jessie Liu may not have been strong enough to deal with DC grand jurors.

    t

    Like

    • Bogeyfree says:

      I would argue the crimes were committed against all 2016 voters of PT and thus grand juries can be convened in any state in the country.

      Liked by 5 people

      • franz dorn says:

        Agreed, that is what the law should be for a crime of nationwide implications. Is that what the law is? Anyone? Any precedents?

        Like

      • warrprin1 says:

        💯% agreed, Bogey. The crimes were committed against you, me, and almost 65M others of us. President Trump has been the public face of the aggrieved, but the deliberately plotted victimization was intended to take down all of us, the “irredeemable Deplorables”.

        Hell hath no fury like a woman (and her groupies) scorned.
        How ya like us now, Hilly, Billy, & Obamy?

        Liked by 6 people

    • Justah says:

      The NSA Data Center is in Utah. Not the headquarters, but the Data Center for all Domestic spying.
      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_Data_Center

      Like

  17. Bogeyfree says:

    My question for Ristvan is…….

    If a DOJ/FBI employee who is sworn to uphold the Constitution and our laws is aware of or has knowledge or evidence of a crime committed by peers, is that person obligated to come forward?

    And if they don’t and it comes out later that they knew and took no action in reporting it to superiors or the IG, can they too be charged with a crime and held responsible?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Beau Geste says:

      The Nazi defense in the “Nuremberg Trials” was “we were just following orders”. It didn’t turn out to be a good defense.

      And, if wray is removed, they can be fired instead of being sent to watch an ethics re-education video.

      Liked by 1 person

    • fabrabbit says:

      Yes, I believe the can be charged but often are not.

      Like

  18. Paul says:

    We’ll see what happens, but YAY!

    Like

  19. jbrickley says:

    John Durham ain’t no Mueller! The BIG UGLY is coming!

    Liked by 1 person

  20. Bogeyfree says:

    Because Barr has resisted the release of the Comey Memos but the Judge has given Barr until Aug 2 to comply at least with the Archey Declarations, it forces Barr’s hand to act IMO.

    So if you are Barr, what are your options and what would you do?

    Liked by 1 person

  21. rayvandune says:

    The to-be-expected spin about the IC being “unable to stop terrorism” is chilling, because some of these criminals might just decide to prove it, in a last ditch attempt to destroy the administration.

    Crazy? Imagine you are facing the possibility of dying in jail. But you have control of an anti-terror investigation. Might you be tempted to just let off the throttle, or even tap the brakes, and let things happen?

    Like

    • mr.piddles says:

      Tangentially related… I was thinking about this the other day… The argument that the IC and the FBI and the Five Eyes and the FISC and the This and the That are indespensible(!) and Too Big To Fail(!)…

      A few years back Obama said of ISIS: “Not an existential threat. Don’t worry about it.“ At the time I thought “what a ridiculous and irresponsible thing to say!” Seemed very dismissive of a huge (global) problem. Ironically, Climate Change, as the Moonbats call it, IS a global existential threat. Who knew? Anyway.

      So let’s walk through a scenario here, put things into some perspective.

      Imagine a DEVASTATING terror attack on the U.S. What would that look like? Imagine 9/11 times 1000. Practical worst case: thermonuclear device detonated in a major metropolitan location. Say a large city… maybe even D.C. itself. Hundreds of thousands vaporized and horrifically incinerated… hundreds of thousands more killed and maimed for decades to come. Millions of square miles uninhabitable, etc. etc.

      Would The Republic survive? We’d go through some period of Martial Law, perhaps, and a massive cleanup and recovery over the course of decades. The World Economy would take a massive hit, of course. BUT I THINK THE REPUBLIC AS WE KNOW IT TODAY WOULD ULTIMATELY SURVIVE.

      Now, consider the Russian Collusion Hoax… imagine Russian Collusion Hoax times 1000. Unchecked, no boundaries, all ideology, no Civil Rights, no Liberty, and certainly no Justice For All. Third World Banana Republic Police State with a dose of MSM Kool-Aid to wash it down. Does The Republic survive?

      Me? Not so sure it does.

      Did I just say I’m more afraid of the FBI, DOJ, and CIA than I am of ISIS and Al Qaeda even in their haydays? I think I just did!

      Liked by 1 person

  22. queensmary says:

    Whitaker used the term “right out of central casting” in referring to Ratcliff. I think this guy Whitaker could play the Kingpin even though I though D’Onofrio did a good job. I like Ratcliff. But he reminds me more of a handsome Fred Flintstone. Looks like the DimWits need to brace for another round of big time losing.

    Like

  23. JJ says:

    Odd that CNN would push for release, if the material is detrimental to the far-left sewer roaches…

    Liked by 1 person

    • tozerbgood8315 says:

      Not surprising to me. They don’t care if it damages the collusion narrative, and are hoping that they can construct a remote link to maybe possible obstruction, with a few brush paint jobs, and thereby get some more democrat votes. It won;t work of course, but logic has never stopped their idiocy before.

      I rest my case. LOL

      Like

  24. CA M says:

    HOW do the American people trust the DOJ and FBI again?— Only truth and justice according to the law. Declassification. Logical thinking: they must prosecute these guys, no one can escape the law. The standard is higher for them. No deals.

    Like

  25. rayvandune says:

    What about if DeGenova’s source was Whitaker, and/or Whitaker’s source is Huber?

    Another crap sandwich?

    Like

  26. Bogeyfree says:

    A 3 month old video of Binney being interviewed by Butowsky on the DNC Server Hack

    Note the part about Clevenger trying to FOIA the the information captured going to Assange, labeling it classified suggesting that the NSA has it!

    Clevenger is and has been trying to get this plus any info from the FBI CART Division who may have reviewed electronic devices recovered during the murder investigation.

    If indeed the NSA has these communications and PT and Barr declassify them it could very well be THE smoking gun that brings the entire house of cards down IMO.

    Like

  27. L_Dave says:

    Paragraph 12 of the court document shown above confirms that a “foreign government” was involved. Sundance already explained that the Italians and Brits were in on this, but it’s looking like we’re about to get official confirmation.

    Liked by 1 person

  28. DMWT says:

    Remember, Jeff Sessions said that they were investigating Comey’s leaks to the press. I understand that is different from this; however, the two should intersect.

    Like

  29. B Woodward says:

    Let me get this straight. So Huber was appointed nearly 2 years ago as the “top federal prosecutor” who can bring charges in Spygate and the federal abuses, seek indictments, and get results for President Trump far more quickly than a second special counsel. Gregg Jarret stated this is a Rosenstein manipulation and machination in which he basically duped Sessions, who is naive and gullible, to select Obama-appointee Huber. Key Representatives in the House stated that when asked, none of the witnesses they interviewed stated that they had also been interviewed by Huber. We have heard nothing from Huber about prosecuting federal abuses. All those crooks are still running loose. And how many Trump supporters have been bankrupted and/or prosecuted by Mueller in this same time period?

    Then we learn from Representatives Jordan and Meadows that flaws in the Sessions-Rosenstein scheme to circumvent Congress’ calls for a special counsel. US Atty Huber can’t investigate his bosses (Rosenstein et al) and Obama.

    And then we’re told that Huber was assigned months ago by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to investigate several controversies linked to Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation. However, witnesses told Mark Meadows’ committee that they had to send their evidence to Huber THREE TIMES because Huber kept losing it. How convenient for the Clintons.

    Finally we heard from AG Barr that Huber never did anything! So Durham was stepping in to take over where Huber had done nothing..

    And now we’re supposed to believe that Huber is out there in Utah prosecuting the deep state affairs described in the Comey memos? Ha!

    Liked by 3 people

    • willthesuevi says:

      I am with you on this BW. I am open to change my mind with some real movement from Huber. Until then I am still “my oh my, how nice” and “bless his heart”.

      Very tired of the breathless overselling on both sides.

      Wake me up when something is broken, bleeding or on fire.

      Liked by 1 person

    • LULU says:

      I believe Huber was set up to investigate the FBI’s/Comey’s handling of the Clinton “matter” which had ended when Comey broke the rules and announced that no action would be taken.

      Did Wray keep these memos away from Huber?

      Like

  30. Bogeyfree says:

    Sperry tweeted the other day that there are a lot of changes coming soon within the IC.

    I wonder if those could include CIA Director and FBI Director?

    Now think about how the left has just pissed off McConnell with their false Russian accusations of him.

    Mitch holds a press conference and is pissed.

    Does anyone think that Mitch just might put Congress in recess come Aug 5

    Now could you imagine if PT then slides in with recess appointments for not only Ratcliffe as ODNI Director but also a new FBI and CIA Director?

    And Barr announces some indictments this week.

    How would that be for draining the swamp if this WAG scenario were to come about?

    Liked by 1 person

  31. Mr e-man says:

    If Barr is really a straight shooter and he appears to be one, he would be approaching this whole investigation very carefully. He has to know he is up against the swamp denizens and they are ruthless and fighting for their lives. Everything must be done by the book, be detailed, thorough, fair, and complete. The issue of not announcing investigations is part and parcel of that. If Whitaker let it slip, he violated those rules. I don’t think Barr put him up to that. However, it makes sense that the Archy memos are coming out this week and Whitaker was going for a couple of attaboys by indicating what we will all know in a couple of days. Just an advance notice.

    But the overall timing for Barr and Durham has to be in conjunction with the IG report, the Archey memos adjudicated to be released, and the Grand Jury information. Which comes first and how does it affect the others?

    It seems to me the IG report is being hidden by Dan Coats. That will end on Aug 15th but it may take some days after for Barr to plow through the roadblock. I wouldn’t think the Grand Jury has had enough time to indict anyone so far. So the timing is release of the Archey memos early August, release of the IG report late August, and Grand Jury indictments shortly after that. Once we get an indictment, the ball will be rolling downhill.

    Like

  32. Bogeyfree says:

    I would suggest everyone think about re-reading this thread by Sundance back in April because if we are right and if info comes out this week on one of the top tier perpetrators then IMO it could mean…….

    Barr listened to Sundance and has gone backwards and uncovered the real Spygate, knowing this Russia Collusion/frame job of PT was the cover-up.

    Barr, PT and others have been asking all along how did this start and why? What was the predicate?

    As Sundance outlines and suggests, the real Spygate was BEFORE 2016 and everything after that was the cover-up.

    https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/04/22/spygate-and-the-steele-dossier-were-the-cover-story-the-real-issue-is-years-of-obama-era-surveillance-and-political-spy-operations/

    Liked by 2 people

  33. Vocem meam says:

    If Huber was investigating Comey’s memos while Whitaker was still at DOJ (that is very likely), he would have known about it. There would be no need for anyone to leak it to him. The important question is the timing of his statement. I don’t think it was a slip of the tongue. Either he’s anti-Trump and was attempting to help CNN (unlikely), or he was asked by someone at DOJ, most likely AG Barr. If DOJ subsequently tells the court they need to keep he memos classified, then it will be a strong indication they wanted to keep the investigation secret until now.
    The only reason CNN wants the memos is because they think there’s something in them damaging to the President. It wouldn’t have been hard to convince them since they’re already delusional. But who would have put them up to it? Was it Clapper? He might not know what’s in them. If true, he would want to know if they contain anything that would expose him for his role in the plot against Trump.

    Like

    • Richard Whitney says:

      The Dems and the perps want the memos released. CNN is just their agent.
      Back in January 2018, Feinstein leaked the testimony of Glenn Simpson/GPS. She later claimed that she had been taking cold medicine which affected her judgment. She did it so the perps would know what Simpson testified, and they would know how to adjust their future testimonies and prepare their defenses.
      Whitaker doesn’t say Comey is a perp. He says Huber is investigating things related to Comey (and many are eager to interpret that as ‘Comey a perp’). Huber already has sworn testimony from Yates, Lynch and others against which he can compare to the information in Comey’s memos. And when the trials come, Comey will be testifying against those perps – because he wasn’t part of the coup.

      Like

      • when the trials come, Comey will be testifying against those perps – because he wasn’t part of the coup.

        Don’t believe a word of it. Comey was perhaps the biggest “perp” of all.

        Like

      • Spot on! I have written a much later comment detailing why I think Comey may get charged for some of his acts, but they were a choice of lesser evils evils he faced when choosing whether on not to participate in the plot to take down Trump. Trump will definitely pardon Comey if he is charged and convicted.

        Guys, as much as you’ll hate to hear this, Comey chose NOT to participate in the plot to remove Trump. Comey met one on one with Trump several times. This is simply not done. A President and FBI Director NEVER meet one on one. Comey spilled the details of what was happening to Trump, helped formulate a ‘rule of law’ counter to the plotters and agreed to play his role until the entire episode was wrapped up. Comey has been `playing his role’ ever since.

        Like

        • Richard Whitney says:

          You have the scent.
          What gave me the scent, and then the trail, was ‘way back. I was suspicious of everyone’s interpretation of the Flynn charge. Then a few months later the Page&Strzok texts were revealed, with the entire ‘Page&Strzok are lovers’ story, which was suspicious from the get-go.
          Lovers? Did you see any ‘lover’ texts, a la “you were great last night!”? Any hotel receipts, and restaurant receipts? Any spousal reactions (none, in fact Strzok’s wife gets a promotion at the SEC, really as a payoff for the work he did).
          But the ‘lovers’ story was out there, and people still believe it (without a shred of evidence). So why the ‘lovers’ story? Why would you need that story? As a cover for your real; activity.
          Suppose some goodytwoshoes at DoJ or FBI asked “Why are you two always texting each other?” How would you have answered? “Oh, we are committing treason.” Probably not; that person might tell on you!
          But a good cover story is “Shhh. Listen. We are having an affair. Just some suburban sinning. Keep it under your hat, OK?” Any co-worker hearing that would nod, maybe disapprove but wouldn’t repeat it.
          So why did they need that cover? For Andy McCabe? Exactly not. He already knew what they were doing, he was aiding and abetting the treason.
          Not for McCabe. For Comey. McCabe, Page, Strzok and a few others were working the dark side, and Comey was not part of it. Comey had to be kept in the dark.
          Later we learn about the tarmac meeting, how the reporter gets tipped off, and his boss gets independent confirmation. I’d bet a dollar that Comey is behind that expose.
          On December 18, 2018, Lynch testifies under oath about her conversations with Comey. She committed perjury then, because the truth would reveal a more serious crime.
          Comey’s memos will be entered into evidence against Lynch, and Yates and Brennan and maybe some others, when the time comes.
          You are also correct that Comey will have to explain some of his actions in a courtroom. He may be guilty of some crimes because he was surrounded by the cabal gang, above him and below him in authority. And he is still an unlikeable twerp. But he wasn’t part of the cabal.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Correct. Most importantly he couldn’t not allow Hillary’s crimes to be swept under the carpet by a corrupted AG and high level DOJ. Especially after she won. So he stands there lists ALL her crimes in great detail then tells us there is not a snowballs chance in hell a DOJ Prosecutior will touch this, the end.

            How can people not see that Comey just made it impossible to hide Clintons email crimes, forever? How can people not see how brave it was for him to take that step?

            Like

    • LULU says:

      Who has had “custody” of the Comey/Archey memos? The FBI?

      Like

  34. For two years we have heard about pending Democrat indictments. They never happen. I cannot believe there will be any if there has never been any. Little hope right now.

    Like

  35. gda53 says:

    Perhaps an attorney can opine on this comment:

    “There is emerging evidence that foreign governments were involved in the attempted coup d’tat.
    That means the crime elevates from seditious conspiracy, with a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison, to TREASON, which requires death.”

    Is this true, and if it is, then is it just a coincidence that the death penalty was just reinstated?

    Asking for a friend….

    Like

    • vocem meam says:

      It only becomes treason if the foreign government(s) were classified as an enemy of the United States by our government at the time the actions took place. I’m not a lawyer but the definition of treason in the Constitution is clear.

      Like

    • Bob says:

      Treason in the strict legal sense requires assisting an enemy of the US. Barr said this wasn’t treason in the strict legal sense. It is more akin to sedition.

      Like

  36. Richard Whitney says:

    …Or it could mean that Comey’s memos are substantial evidence that Yates, Lynch, Brennan and some others have committed crimes, and also perjured themselves. Maybe that is why they were upclassified, to keep their information away from perps when they testify. We’ll see.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I’m openly suspicious of Comey’s memos, and of CNN’s drive to publish them. These memos were written by a clever criminal, and presented to us “only second-hand” by someone else named Archer. I have no reason to believe that they are truthful. Instead, I believe that they are a calculated attempt to “poison the well” of potential jurors in a future criminal trial. Comey has calculated to spread “his version” far-and-wide. But I don’t trust that man. “It’s just another dossier.”

      Like

  37. dollops says:

    Apologies to others who might have remarked on this (over 700 comments)!
    What is CNN’s motivation for the FOI request? Are they trying the old “head ’em off at the pass” ploy by getting ahead of the news with their usual distractions, “interpretations” and whatabouts?
    And if that is their motive, why hasn’t someone in the deep state leaked them enough to start the campaign of misinformation? Could it be that the deep state is so afraid of this going public that they don’t even trust their junkyard dog media to handle it?

    Like

  38. Bendix says:

    I wanted to come here last night. The second evening in a row, there was a thunderstorm and my power was out for hours.
    Look what I missed! This is yuge!

    I must confess I understand almost none of this.
    If it were broken down to say, educational coloring book level, I might have a chance; but it’s very hot and I’m fried.
    When I am getting is that something might actually happen to that giant creep Comey, at long last.
    I have been telling people, I want the prosecutions to start at the Comey level. Comey or what’s his name, see. I can’t even remember.
    None of the small fish.

    Liked by 1 person

  39. Bendix says:

    Let’s not forget Comey’s bogus prosecution of Martha Stewart. There was no legitimate reason for him to pursue that.
    It has nothing to do with the Russia plot, but it speaks to his lack of character.

    Like

  40. Sergio Bianchi says:

    Whittaker suddenly appearing anywhere (interim DNI?)…let alone what he said about Comey (Huber was about CF…’and other things’, remember?) … coupled with deGenova’s apearances past two days seems to signal significant activity.

    On yesterday’s HowieCarr Show, where de Genova is the most comfortable and open, Carr asked him at segment close how he felt about what’s happening– and he literally sang the opening to ‘Everything’s Coming Up Roses’!

    We’ll see what happens.

    Liked by 1 person

  41. Bendix says:

    Here’s another very fishy tale swirling around Comey.
    The girl Anthony Weiner sexted with, allegedly writing an open letter to Comey, published in Buzzfeed.
    I said at the time, this was written by no 16 year old ever.
    That whole “reopening an investigation right before the election”, with Hillary droning on about her ‘momentum’, was a smokescreen for something really smelly.

    Liked by 1 person

  42. If the Treepers are all in an uproar about Huber, Whitaker, indictments, grand juries and such; can you imagine how upset the real perps are? I bet that .45 on the nightstand looks inviting to some of them.

    Like

    • Mr e-man says:

      Not yet. Most are probably assuming their “cover” story of seeing smoke around Trump and Russia gave them reason to investigate him. So they did nothing wrong. In fact, they were patriots protecting our country. They also know the MSM will circle the wagons to protect them and shift the blame to Trump. They also know that Dems are never prosecuted so they feel pretty safe.

      What they are worried about is the spying has been going on since 2012 and the IRS scandal smidgen. They are worried that that truth may come out as it predates any smoke they saw in the Trump campaign. No valid legal predicate. Obama was illegally spying on political opposition

      Liked by 1 person

  43. MaineCoon says:

    My thoughts based on audio & Whitaker’s body language at below words/phrases:

    *** W. uses his upper body & his forearm/hands to emphasize words/phrases important to him

    @ 1:17: forceful body movement to emphasize “genius of this investigation” (reflects importance of this aspect)

    @1:23: body & hand emphasis when he “prosecute anyone who needs to be prosecuted”

    @1:28: this key comment Sundance is emphasizing, “Comey’s memos & the like” has more than just the body/hand emphasis. By the time he finishes the phrase he has slowly turned his head away from the interview, slowly closing his eyes (as if they is more in his mind that he doesn’t want to discuss with her). By turning from her, he totally ends this aspect and line of thought in the interview. Obviously, he doesn’t want to expound on it, maybe realizing he said too much. After looking away and turning back, his conversation goes in a new and totally generic conversation. He has successfully moved the interviewer’s mind forward as she totally missed the segment on ‘Comey & the like’, either intentionally or unintentionally.

    Since I don’t watch msm, I don’t know the interviewer’s history. Any guesses as to why she didn’t to follow-up on Comey issue?

    I think Whitaker’s body language substantiates his hypothesis.

    Like

  44. Phyllis Chandler says:

    I’ve learned during the past 3 yrs since this all started, if you listen carefully to these different guys doing interviews you CAN absolutely pick up stuff! But only if you’ve paid attention to the whole story!

    Like

  45. franz dorn says:

    Just heard Soloman on Hannity’s radio program say that declass may be delayed because of DNI transfer. Its never sped up.

    Liked by 1 person

    • willthesuevi says:

      I am so very tired of our side overplaying our hand. We look ridiculous. We need to be better than Rachael Maddow and company. I know it is exciting to scoop everyone else, but dang folks. I want good news as much as the next person but could we temper ourselves a bit. I feel like I am in the middle of an old SNL skit.

      Maybe not hit the presses until something really happens.

      Like

  46. Bob says:

    Playing devils advocate but how would Whittaker know this? Didn’t he leave the DOJ?

    Like

  47. anna-Mary Crickmer, MSW says:

    re: Epstein comment (accidently hit return key)

    Like

  48. Bogeyfree says:

    Well at least a judge threw out today with prejudice the lawsuit the DNC brought against PT, Assange, PapaD, Manafort, Mifsud, Stone, Russians and others .

    https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6225696-DNC-Trump-7-30-19.html

    So I wonder if this was a block strategy all along and if now it opens the door for the DNC to be looked at?

    I’m curious if this will have any impact on the Clevenger suits?

    I wonder if Sundance is going to have a thread on this?

    Like

  49. eyeswideoopen says:

    Ok… I think I get it. The significance of the Comey memos is the circular news/prosecutorial set up arrangement. Comey’s friend that he was leaking information to is a Professor – I forget what university. Using the university network (too long of a story to include here), they could coordinate and amplify whatever news they want the public – especially young people to receive (Russian collusion). I recall somebody saying that volume II of Mueller’s report was all news stories. Nothing substantial. So who was the head of the snake in terms of the “news”. Michael Isikoff?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s