Judicial Watch Uncovers Email Between Clinton Lawyer David Kendall and FBI Lawyer James Baker Same Day FBI Was Forced to Re-Open Investigation…

A lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch has unearthed an email [full pdf below] from Clinton Lawyer David Kendall to FBI chief legal counsel James Baker on the day the FBI was forced to re-open the Clinton email investigation due to the Weiner laptop.

With the passage of time the inherent issues have become somewhat clouded, and most people have forgotten many of the inherent issues that showcased how the FBI and DOJ had decided in advance not to prosecute Hillary Clinton. However, the key takeaway from this latest FOIA finding is that Clinton lawyers directly contacted the FBI team that was investigating the Weiner laptop.  (Note: read email chain bottom to top)


The Weiner laptop emails were originally discovered by New York investigators and reported to the FBI office in Washington DC on September 28th, 2016. However, the FBI never took action to review the emails until a month later on October 28th.

It was DOJ officials within SDNY (Southern District of New York) who called Main Justice (DOJ in DC) and asked about a needed search warrant a month later that kicked off the review.

Let’s look at the Page/Strzok messages and remind ourselves of what was going on.

Here are the messages from Lisa Page and Peter Strzok surrounding the original date that New York officials notified Washington DC FBI.  It’s important to note the two different entities: DOJ -vs- FBI.

According to the September 28, 2016, messages from FBI Agent Peter Strzok it was the SDNY in New York telling Andrew McCabe in DC about the issue.  Pay close attention to the convo:

(pdf source for all messages here)

Notice: “hundreds of thousands of emails turned over by Weiner’s attorney to SDNY”.   This is not an outcome of a New York Police Dept. raid on Anthony Weiner.  This is Weiner’s attorney going to the U.S. attorney and voluntarily turning over the laptop and by extension the emails.  The emails were not turned over to the FBI in New York, the actual emails were turned over to the U.S. Attorney in the Southern District, Preet Bahara.

The SDNY then called the FBI Mid-Year-Exam team in Washington DC, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe was notified, and then nothing happened for over three weeks.

On October 21, 2016, a phone call kicks off additional inquiry.  This is the call referenced by James Comey in the Bret Baier interview.

Someone from New York called “Main Justice” (the DOJ National Security Division in DC) and notified DOJ-NSD Deputy Asst. Attorney General George Toscas of the Huma Abedin/Hillary Clinton emails via the “weiner investigation”.

George Toscas “wanted to ensure information got to Andy“, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe…. so he called FBI Agent Peter Strzok…. who told George Toscas “we know”.

Peter Strzok then tells Bill Priestap. Of course, Deputy Director Andrew McCabe already knew about the emails since September 28th, 2016, more than three weeks earlier.

That phone call kicks off an internal debate about the previously closed Clinton email investigation.  And Andrew McCabe sitting on the notification from New York for over three weeks kicks off a second internal FBI discussion about McCabe needing to recuse himself because of the optics of his doing nothing.

It’s October 27th, 2016, James Comey chief-of-staff Jim Rybicki wants McCabe to recuse himself.  But Rybicki is alone on an island. Lisa Page is furious at such a suggestion, partly because she is McCabe’s legal counsel and if McCabe is recused so too is she.

At the same time as they are debating how to handle the Huma Abedin/Hillary Clinton emails, the FBI begin leaking to the media to frame a specific narrative.  The issue of them sitting on the laptop for three weeks and doing nothing is a potentially damning detail.

Important to note here: at no time is there any conversation -or hint of a conversation- that anyone is reviewing the content of the laptop emails.  The discussions don’t mention a single word about content… every scintilla of conversation is about how to handle the issues of the emails themselves.  Actually, there’s not a single person mentioned in thousands of text messages that applies to an actual person who is looking at any content.

Quite simply: there is a glaringly transparent lack of an “investigation”.

Within this “tight group” at FBI, as Comey puts it, there is not a single mention of a person who is sitting somewhere looking through the reported “600,000” Clinton emails that was widely reported by media.  There’s absolutely ZERO evidence of anyone looking at emails or scouring through laptop data…. and FBI Agent Peter Strzok has no staff under him who he discusses assigned to such a task…. and Strzok damned sure ain’t doing it.

It’s still October 27th, 2016, the day before James Comey announces his FBI decision to re-open the Clinton investigation.  Jim Rybicki is still saying McCabe should be recused from input; everyone else, including FBI Legal Counsel James Baker, is disagreeing with Rybicki and siding with Lisa Page.

Meanwhile the conversation has shifted slightly to “PC”, probable cause.  Read:

While Lisa Page is leaking stories to Devlin Barrett (Wall Street Journal), the internal discussion amid the “small group” is about probable cause.

The team is now saying if there was no probable cause when Comey closed the original email investigation in July 2016 (remember the very tight boundaries of review), then there’s no probable cause in October 2016 to reopen the investigation regardless of what the email content might be.  The inspector general report from June 2018 explains why:

Page #164, footnote #124

The DOJ’s legal interpretation of “intent”, as a prerequisite for criminal charges based on transmission of classified data, virtually assured Clinton would not be prosecuted.

This appears to be how the FBI “small group” or “tight team” justify doing nothing with the content and notification received from New York (SDNY).  They received notification of the emails on September 28th and it’s now October 27th, and they haven’t even looked at them. Heck, they are debating if there’s even a need to look at it.

Then on October 28th, 2016, the FBI and Main Justice officials have a conference call about the entire Huma Abedin/Hillary Clinton email issue.  Here’s where it gets interesting.

George Toscas and David Laufman from DOJ-NSD articulate a position that something needs to happen because Main Justice is now concerned about the issue of FBI (McCabe) sitting on the emails for over three weeks without any feedback to SDNY (New York).

Comey later admitted in his memoir “A Higher Loyalty,” that political calculations shaped his decisions during this period. But, he wrote, they were calibrated to help Clinton:

“Assuming, as nearly everyone did, that Hillary Clinton would be elected president of the United States in less than two weeks, what would happen to the FBI, the Justice Department or her own presidency if it later was revealed, after the fact, that she still was the subject of an FBI investigation?”

Thanks to the political decision of FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, Main Justice in DC, specifically DOJ National Security Division, now looks like they are facilitating a cover-up operation being conducted by the FBI “small group”.  [which is actually true, but they can’t let that be so glaringly obvious].  FBI Director James Comey is worried that if anyone found out they had sat on this laptop discovery a “President Clinton” would then come under investigation…..  how would the FBI explain themselves?

As a result of the Top-Tier officials conference call, FBI Agent Strzok is grumpy because his opinion appears to be insignificant; the discussion is above his pay grade.

The decision is now reached to announce the re-opening of the investigation.  This sends Lisa Page bananas…

…In rapid response mode Lisa Page reaches out to journalist Devlin Barrett, again to quickly shape the media coverage.  Now that the world is going to be aware of the need for a Clinton email investigation 2.0 the internal conversation returns to McCabe’s recusal.

Please note that at no time in the FBI is anyone directing an actual investigation of the content of the Clinton emails.  Every single second of every effort is devoted to shaping the public perception of the need for the investigation.  According to Peter Strzok and Lisa Page every media outlet is being watched; every article is being read; and the entire apparatus of the small group (James Baker, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Mike Kortan et al) is shaping coverage therein by contacting their leak outlets.

The laptop emails Anthony Weiner’s lawyer brought to Preet Bharara (SDNY) might have been Anthony Weiner’s leverage to try and escape NY prosecution.  Eric Prince outlined the content of that laptop as carrying much more than just Clinton emails:

“Because of Weinergate and the sexting scandal, the NYPD started investigating it. Through a subpoena, through a warrant, they searched his laptop, and sure enough, found those 650,000 emails. They found way more stuff than just more information pertaining to the inappropriate sexting the guy was doing,” Prince claimed.

“They found State Department emails. They found a lot of other really damning criminal information, including money laundering, including the fact that Hillary went to this sex island with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Bill Clinton went there more than 20 times. Hillary Clinton went there at least six times,” he said.

“The amount of garbage that they found in these emails, of criminal activity by Hillary, by her immediate circle, and even by other Democratic members of Congress was so disgusting they gave it to the FBI, and they said, ‘We’re going to go public with this if you don’t reopen the investigation and you don’t do the right thing with timely indictments,’” Prince explained.

“I believe – I know, and this is from a very well-placed source of mine at 1PP, One Police Plaza in New York – the NYPD wanted to do a press conference announcing the warrants and the additional arrests they were making in this investigation, and they’ve gotten huge pushback, to the point of coercion, from the Justice Department, with the Justice Department threatening to charge someone that had been unrelated in the accidental heart attack death of Eric Garner almost two years ago. That’s the level of pushback the Obama Justice Department is doing against actually seeking justice in the email and other related criminal matters,” Prince said. (Link)

There’s never been any investigation that would disprove the laptop content was not what Eric Prince’s sources outlined. However, the SDNY, responding to upper level leadership from Main Justice and FBI in DC, turned over all material and essentially the laptop was buried.

In DC the FBI (Comey and McCabe) created the appearance of a re-opening of the Clinton investigation on October 28th, 2016, to keep control and ensure the investigative outcomes remained in their hands; as Comey said: “they had no choice.”

However, once the FBI opened the investigation October 28th, they did exactly the same thing they had done from September 28th to October 28th… they did nothing.  A few days later they declared the second investigation closed, and that was that.

Again, they never expected her to lose.

When she did lose, panic ensued.

Now does Mueller make more sense?

The widely held view of the process is/was that Rod Rosenstein selected Robert Mueller as special counsel, and following that selection Mueller created his team. The perspective from CTH research is slightly different.

CTH believes that following the firing of FBI Director James Comey, the FBI Chief Legal Counsel, Jim Baker and FBI Deputy Director, Andrew McCabe; together with the corrupt small group that was involved in the prior year’s counterintelligence investigation; reacted to Comey’s firing by pressuring Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to appoint their preferred person, Robert Mueller.

Within this internal debate (May 2017); at the time this construct was being argued; is when the famous comment from Rosenstein originates: “what do you want me to do, wear a wire?” The corrupt FBI investigative crew; having initiated and continued “Crossfire Hurricane”; including people from the DOJ-NSD side (Ohr, Weissmann, etc) were pressuring Rosenstein to appoint a special counsel….. but not just any special counsel.. Baker and McCabe had the person pre-selected. That person was Robert Mueller.

They needed Robert Mueller because they needed a person who held a similar level of risk from prior activity exposure as themselves.  Mueller, directly or indirectly, was at the center of multiple Obama and Clinton abuses of power.

Obviously we can see the reason for this FBI/DOJ crew to need a special counsel. As career corruptocrats they were operating from a mindset of mitigating risk to themselves and continuing to advance on the objective to attack the executive office through their investigative schemes.

The key point here is subtle but very significant. Robert Mueller didn’t select his team, the corrupt team, the “small group”, selected him.

There is a great deal of inconsistent application of law surrounding the DOJ/FBI investigative authority during 2015 and 2016. There is also a great deal of fatigue surrounding discussion of those inconsistent applications. Contradictions, inconsistency and obtuse justifications are as rampant in our midst as the political narratives shaping them. Perhaps that’s by design.  WATCH:


Reading Chapter 11 of the June 2018 IG Report reinforces an acceptance that not only is there a need for a special counsel, but there is a brutally obvious need for multiple special counsels; each given a specific carve-out investigation that comes directly from the content of the Inspector General report. This issue of the handling of the Weiner/Abedin laptop screams for a special counsel investigation on that facet alone. Why?

Well, consider this from page #388 (emphasis mine):

Midyear agents obtained a copy of the Weiner laptop from NYO immediately after the search warrant was signed on October 30.

The laptop was taken directly to Quantico where the FBI’s Operational Technology Division (OTD) began processing the laptop. The Lead Analyst told us that given the volume of emails on the laptop and the difficulty with de-duplicating the emails that “at least for the first few days, the scale of what we’re doing seem[ed] really, really big.”

Strzok told us that OTD was able “to do some amazing things” to “rapidly de-duplicate” the emails on the laptop, which significantly lowered the number of emails that the Midyear team would have to individually review. Strzok stated that only after that technological breakthrough did he begin to think it was “possible we might wrap up before the election.” (pg 388)

The key takeaway here is two-fold. First, the laptop is in the custody of the FBI; that’s important moving forward (I’ll explain later). Also, specifically important, FBI Agent Peter Strzok, the lead investigative authority in the Hillary Clinton MYE (Mid-Year-Exam), is explaining to the IG how they were able to process an exhaustive volume of emails (350,000) and Blackberry communications (344,000) in a few days; [Oct 30 to Nov 5]

Note: “OTD was able “to do some amazing things to rapidly de-duplicate” the emails on the laptop.

OK, you got that?

Now lets look at the very next page, #389 (again, emphasis mine):

[…] The FBI determined that Abedin forwarded two of the confirmed classified emails to Weiner. The FBI reviewed 6,827 emails that were either to or from Clinton and assessed 3,077 of those emails to be “potentially work-related.”

The FBI analysis of the review noted that “[b]ecause metadata was largely absent, the emails could not be completely, automatically de-duplicated or evaluated against prior emails recovered during the investigation” and therefore the FBI could not determine how many of the potentially work-related emails were duplicative of emails previously obtained in the Midyear investigation. (pg 389)

See the problem? See the contradiction?

Strzok is saying due to some amazing wizardry the FBI forensics team was able to de-duplicate the emails. However, FBI forensics is saying they were NOT able to de-duplicate the emails.

Both of these statements cannot be true. And therein lies the underlying evidence to support a belief the laptop content was never actually reviewed. But it gets worse, much worse….

To show how it’s FBI Agent Peter Strzok that is lying; go back to chapter #9 and re-read what the New York case agent was saying about the content of the laptop.

The New York FBI analysis supports the FBI forensic statement in that no de-duplication was possible because the metadata was not consistent. The New York FBI Weiner case agent ran into this metadata issue when using extraction software on the laptop.

CHAPTER 9: The case agent assigned to the Weiner investigation was certified as a Digital Extraction Technician and, as such, had the training and skills to extract digital evidence from electronic devices.

The case agent told the OIG that he began processing Weiner’s devices upon receipt on September 26. The case agent stated that he noticed “within hours” that there were “over 300,000 emails on the laptop.”

The case agent told us that on either the evening of September 26 or the morning of September 27, he noticed the software program on his workstation was having trouble processing the data on the laptop. (pg 274)

The New York Case Agent then describes how inconsistent metadata within the computer files for the emails and Blackberry communications, made it impossible for successful extraction. The FBI NY case agent and the Quantico FBI forensics agent agree on the metadata issue and the inability to use their software programs for extraction and layered comparison for the purposes of de-duplication.

Both NY and Quantico contradict the statement to the IG by FBI Agent Peter Strzok. However, that contradiction, while presented in a factual assertion by the IG, is entirely overlooked and never reconciled within the inspector general report. That irreconcilable statement also sheds more sunlight on the motives of Strzok.

Next up, there were only three FBI people undertaking the October Clinton email review. To learn who they are we jump back to Chapter #11, page #389.

The Midyear team flagged all potentially work-related emails encountered during the review process and compared those to emails that they had previously reviewed in other datasets. Any work-related emails that were unique, meaning that they did not appear in any other dataset, were individually reviewed by the Lead Analyst, [Peter] Strzok, and FBI Attorney 1 [Tashina Gauhar] for evidentiary value. (pg 389)

Pete Strzok, Tash Gauhar and the formerly unknown lead analyst we now know to be Sally Moyer. That’s it. Three people.

This is the crew that created the “wizardry” that FBI Director James Comey says allowed him to tell congress with confidence that 1,355,980 electronic files (pg 389), containing 350,000 emails and 344,000 Blackberry communications were reviewed between October 30th and the morning of November 6th, 2016.

Three people.

Pete, Tash, and Sally the lead analyst. Uh huh.


The Inspector General just presents the facts; that’s obviously what he did. Then it’s up to FBI and DOJ leadership to accept the facts, interpret them, and apply their meaning.

No bias?

But FBI is committed to bias training?


There is an actual hero in all of this though. It’s that unnamed FBI Case Agent in New York who wouldn’t drop the laptop issue and forced the FBI in DC to take action on the laptop. Even the IG points this out (chapter #9, page 331):

We found that what changed between September 29 and October 27 that finally prompted the FBI to take action was not new information about what was on the Weiner laptop but rather the inquiries from the SDNY prosecutors and then from the Department. The only thing of significance that had changed was the calendar and the fact that people outside of the FBI were inquiring about the status of the Weiner laptop. (pg 331)

Those SDNY prosecutors only called Main Justice in DC because the New York case agent went in to see them and said he wasn’t going to be the scape goat for a buried investigation (chapter #9, pg 303) “The case agent told us that he scheduled a meeting on October 19 with the two SDNY AUSAs assigned to the Weiner investigation because he felt like he had nowhere else to turn.” … “The AUSAs both told us that the case agent appeared to be very stressed and worried that somehow he would be blamed in the end if no action was taken.”

On October 20, 2016, the AUSAs met with their supervisors at SDNY and informed them of their conversation with the Weiner case agent. The AUSAs stated that they told their supervisors the substantive information reported by the case agent, the case agent’s concerns that no one at the FBI had expressed interest in this information, and their concern that the case agent was stressed out and might act out in some way. (pg 304)

Why would the New York Case Agent be worried?

Consider Page 274, footnote #165:

fn 165: No electronic record exists of the case agent’s initial review of the Weiner laptop. The case agent told us that at some point in mid-October 2016 the NYO ASAC instructed the case agent to wipe his work station. The case agent explained that the ASAC was concerned about the presence of potentially classified information on the case agent’s work station, which was not authorized to process classified information.

The case agent told us that he followed the ASAC’s instructions, but that this request concerned him because the audit trail of his initial processing of the laptop would no longer be available. The case agent clarified that none of the evidence on the Weiner laptop was impacted by this, explaining that the FBI retained the Weiner laptop and only the image that had been copied onto his work station was deleted. The ASAC recalled that the case agent “worked through the security department to address the concern” of classified information on an unclassified system. He told us that he did not recall how the issue was resolved.

Now watch the Devin Nunes embed tweet video:



  • There were only three people in the Mid-Year-Event team granted authority to physically do the Clinton email review.
  • They were: FBI Agent Peter Strzok, FBI Attorney-1 Tashina “Tash” Gauhar, and an Sally Moyer, the lead analyst.
  • FBI Agent Peter Strzok says they were able to cull the number of emails through the use of “some amazing things to rapidly de-duplicate” the emails.
  • The New York FBI case agent assigned to the Weiner investigation, a certified Digital Extraction Technician, as well as the FBI forensics team in Quantico say it was impossible to use the conflicted metadata to “de-duplicate” the emails.
  • Someone is lying.
  • FBI Director James Comey said his investigative unit used some form of “wizardry” to review the content of the Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner laptop.
  • The Inspector General makes no determination as to who is telling the truth; and never asked the question of whether an actual review of the laptop emails took place.
  • The FBI still has possession of the Abedin/Weiner laptop?


⇑ These Cannot Both Be True ⇓



This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Election 2016, FBI, IG Report Clinton Investigation, IG Report McCabe, Legislation, media bias, Notorious Liars, propaganda, Secretary of State, Spying, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

466 Responses to Judicial Watch Uncovers Email Between Clinton Lawyer David Kendall and FBI Lawyer James Baker Same Day FBI Was Forced to Re-Open Investigation…

  1. 🍺Gunny66 says:



    • Arty Shellrep says:

      You FAILED the sobriety test…again.

      Liked by 2 people

    • RobInPA says:

      Great work, as always by sundance, and continued kudos to Judicial Watch for doing the work that the elected scoundrel’s in The Swamp should be doing!

      With that said, ho hum, tick tock, it’s all ado about nothing.

      I used to have a high degree of confidence that ‘justice would prevail / be served’ and the criminals seeking to destroy and/or sell-out our country and overthrow our duly elected MAGA president would pay dearly for their crimes.

      Now, not so much. Pretty sad.

      Liked by 10 people

      • mopar2016 says:

        The article would mean more if there were any good guys to take care of business.
        There’s plenty of solid evidence that shows democrat corruption and Russian collusion.
        I gave up on a second special council being appointed a year and a half ago.

        Yet our side has been chasing our tail for two years, trying to prove our innocence over nothing.


  2. This just casts further light on what I think is the core issue with everything we’ve seen.

    The Clintons had been conducting illegal/treasonous acts for a decade or more and had by stages compromised the entire legal and law enforcement apparatus of the US.Basically, none of their crimes could be looked at without unravelling the entirety of them, thus exposing DOJ and FBI complicity in covering for the Clinton’s in prior events. A gordian knot of epic proportions.

    This dilemma would be settled one way or another by the 2016 election. Either Clinton would be legitimized and all those crimes erased, or Trump would be elected placing the Clinton’s , DOJ and FBI in jeopardy.

    Trump won and in 2 years the entire upper levels of DOJ and FBI have been fired or forced out. He has steadily placed conservative judges on all benches and made moves to limit the worst of the judicial wrongs. He has done this while facing a 100% negative coverage in maainstream media.

    Everything is politics and moves cannot be made to make high level arrests until the political mood was right and until the judiciary had been returned to “rule of law”. That time is almost upon us. You cannot fail to see the new levels of self assuredness POTUS shows in his rallies and the SOTU.

    Keep the faith, Trump is draining the swamp, when a big body of putrid slime covered water begins to drain it’s hard to see evidence.Eventually there’ll be an almighty belch of fetid gas and the draining will be plain for all to see…it’s happening folks.

    Liked by 42 people

    • Hereward the Woke says:

      Great post. It ALL comes back to the Clintons. Judicial Watch is doing the job the FBI should be doing.

      Liked by 21 people

      • Ospreyzone says:

        Agreed. Judicial Watch has, from the very beginning, been the ONLY group tenacious enough to pursue these rats through the maze. They deserve our financial support in addition to just our cheerleading.

        Liked by 14 people

      • smiley says:

        Hereward the Woke wrote, “It ALL comes back to the Clintons.”

        I need to take off my tinfoil cap to write this (sarcasm).

        I believe the Clintons are a result of the SYSTEMATIC corruption within the Justice Department for much longer than they have been around.

        Reagan shocked the system with his election and the system reset with George H.W. Bush to Bill Clinton to George W Bush to Obama. All allowed the globalist cabal to be further ensconced into control.

        We are now into the second generation of Justice corruption since Reagan.

        Consider that this small group goes back to those within the Justice system that brought us Enron, Arthur Anderson, Merrill Lynch, Ted Stephens, Uranium One.

        How does someone tear out the roots of a corrupt system is really my question?

        Liked by 3 people

        • G. Combs says:

          The corruption goes ALL the way back to 1913 and the Feral Reserve, 16th & 17th Amendments.

          Remember FDR used an E.O. to declare that American citizens MUST give their gold to the BANKSTERS and the Congress, Senate and SUPREME COURT DID NOTHING!!!
          “On May 23, 1933, Congressman, Louis T. McFadden, brought formal charges
          against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, The
          Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of United States Treasury for
          numerous criminal acts, including but not limited to, CONSPIRACY, FRAUD,
          link He was called crazy by the press, driven out of congress and when he would not shut up he was murdered.

          Article I, section 10, clause 1.

          No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

          Our current banking system/Federal Reserve breaks BOTH:
          “emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts”
          “the Obligation of Contracts”

          “….First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Daly (1969) was a courtroom drama worthy of a movie script.3 Defendant Jerome Daly opposed the bank’s foreclosure on his $14,000 home mortgage loan on the ground that there was no consideration for the loan. “Consideration” (“the thing exchanged”) is an essential element of a contract. Daly, an attorney representing himself, argued that the bank had put up no real money for his loan. The courtroom proceedings were recorded by Associate Justice Bill Drexler, whose chief role, he said, was to keep order in a highly charged courtroom where the attorneys were threatening a fist fight. Drexler hadn’t given much credence to the theory of the defense, until Mr. Morgan, the bank’s president, took the stand. To everyone’s surprise, Morgan admitted that the bank routinely created money “out of thin air” for its loans, and that this was standard banking practice. “It sounds like fraud to me,” intoned Presiding Justice Martin Mahoney amid nods from the jurors. In his court memorandum, Justice Mahoney stated:
          Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis,…”

          did create the entire $14,000.00 in money and credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note.

          “…Justice Mahoney, who was not dependent on campaign financing or hamstrung by precedent, went so far as to threaten to prosecute and expose the bank. He died less than six months after the trial, in a mysterious accident that appeared to involve poisoning…..” http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/dollar-deception.php

          Liked by 3 people

    • hellinahandbasket says:

      One little problem . . . The Clinton’s and all their shenanigans are tied to a President – since the beginning, they (rather smartly) hitched their wagon to an administration. To take-down the Clinton’s means taking down a President – and their most egregious criminal actions occurred during the 0bama Administration, and there ain’t no way in hell ANYONE in this government is going to take-down a black President, no way, no how, not now, not ever….. and with that, the Clinton’s skate away, and live happily ever after. I’ve learned to accept this, tough as it may be, but I think it’s a reality that cannot be ignored.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Dan Patterson says:

        The book by Colin Flaherty “Don’t Make the Black Kids Angry” is a window into the racist (or is it reverse racist??) philosophy of the feminine guilt complex promoted by emancipated women and the men that fear them. Feminine because men, if asked when they can reply with unvarnished honesty, will make mostly binary decisions. Women in the same circumstance shade their response (“Well, maybe so. BUT..” etc.) and seek to blunt success for all but their closest tribe. The obbaamas’ rise are examples of blunted success of “the other tribes” and phony victories of the home team to promote the chosen, and they will forever be held to a much lower standard than normal. Because “fairness” and the guilt complex. Live with it!
        And so we have the untouchable but criminal and treasonous political class protected by the fear of reprisal; protected because adult men are no longer in charge. Of anything.
        The Clintons along with their toady asswipe courtiers will live lives untouched by justice and not a damned thing can be done about it by anyone. Just ask J Comey, adviser to the ruling class elite..

        Liked by 3 people

      • Will Hunt says:

        possibly but it would take but one incontrovertible, hard evidence fact or issue to be made public that could not be discounted, disputed or ignored even by the most ardently anti-American opposition to start to expose the depravity and illegality up to and including our first black president.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Jederman says:

        I agree, obama and his loathsome crew are up to their necks in this mess. The DS, with the knowledge and support of obama has made this a death match. They have gone beyond the normal venal, power driven corruption.

        Peaceful transfer of power, based on legitimate elections, pfft. Out the window. Active steps to diminish a sitting president. Oh yeah. Obama has gone there and should not be considered untouchable. He crossed the line. Why would we be hesitant to bring a previous president to justice for these specific acts?

        Crystalize it to it’s most basic form and the only reason not to act would be moral cowardice. Obama created this situation and either obama or PT can leave the arena. Unless we take the cowardice route.


        • MGBSE says:

          I believe that obama is nothing more than a Soros puppet whose job it was to golf, play, vacation, party, photo-op, politic and read his teleprompter…while georgie ran the country through executive orders and the auto pen…valarie jarrett supervised obama and lived in the white house with the obama’s…and now that hillary lost – is forced to live’s in the obama DC house too…she is obama’s handler and must monitor his every word and move for fear he will babble secrets before they can get rid of Trump and recover power.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Jederman says:

            I agree, obama didn’t know what time it is and was merely the errand boy. But I’m comfortable leaving that out sometimes and putting it on obama for one reason. He was more than willing to take a little heat in order to enjoy all the perks.

            I still say let the cards fall where they may. Obama knew and as the chief executive is responsible.

            We should not fear the consequences of finding him guilty. The options are to let this cancer of the Left wing anti-Americanism continue to divide the country for another generation. Or, since this has occurred during our generation, let it hit the fan (race riots, civil war… etc etc) and get it over with.

            Why hand this mess to our children?


        • warrprin1 says:

          Speaking of the DS death match and determination to protect O and the Cs, who killed Justice Scalia, and Seth Rich? How much did their families get paid to refuse legitimate investigations into these very strange deaths? Why does this remind me of Mary Jo Kopechne and her family’s response to the circumstances of their daughter’s drowning-by-abandonment?


      • Linda Jean Burkett says:

        This whole mess needs to see the bright light of day, otherwise we’ll have a president that’s closely associated to the former president. She who shall remain nameless. Even if no one goes to jail, at least we won’t have to put up with anymore fundamental changes to the country.

        Liked by 1 person

      • petey says:

        We may have to revisit the theory that the Clintons and Obamas get off scot free , there is some smoke surrounding the thought that Michelle O will run against DJT where there is smoke there is fire. My dream is that 15 minutes after Michelle announces her run “for the good of the country” . DJT at that point has no choice but to send armed agents to arrest anybody who has lied to congress at 4:00 am with FOX news coverage. might make for some good tv

        Liked by 1 person

    • Will Hunt says:

      Excellent and succinct.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Sherbear61 says:

      Mueller IS erasing their crimes…has been for decades, in fact most of the same players are still erasing for the clinton, Barr will come in and tie it all up in a neat little bow.
      I hope PT blows it all up…
      We would be dancing in the streets.

      Liked by 1 person

    • pyromancer76 says:

      Yes, but, Che B. I don’t think the Clintons have done this alone or are the “head” of all the criminality. I think we have to look deeper (and wider). All those payments to the Clinton Crime syndicate came from where and went to whom? Who wants slave labor for their corporations and who wants communist totalitarian control? (All for America’s vast nagural resources?) The roots are both internal and external. Pincer movement. Our President and his patriotic, nationalist crew are getting this. I think this is why the Clintons don’t go down first. They are a symptom, not the cause.


    • che- EXCELLENT post. Bravo!


    • Occasional Commenter says:

      “The DOJ interpretation of intent ensured that Hillary would not be prosecuted.” What about the old maxim that “ignorance of the law is no excuse?”


    • kfish63 says:

      “Eventually there’ll be an almighty belch of fetid gas…” First, brilliant use of the word “fetid”. Second, that belch will be more significant than all the bovine flatus that could ever destroy the ozone. Let’s scan the GND quickly to see is swamp bureaucracy is as forbidden as cattle and swine moving forward.
      Che, I believe your comment to have encapsulated the feelings and observations of most of us. Now, we wait for the fallout.


  3. American says:

    Isn’t it torch and pitchfork time yet?

    Liked by 4 people

  4. TMonroe says:

    Comey: “Assuming, as nearly everyone did, that Hillary Clinton would be elected president of the United States in less than two weeks, what would happen to the FBI, the Justice Department or her own presidency if it later was revealed, after the fact, that she still was the subject of an FBI investigation?”

    Uh, where was this concern of having the current president under investigation? Oh yeah, you’re the one who said you leaked in order to prompt a special counsel investigation! Can you even fathom not only the hypocrisy but the complete pass the media and law enforcement have given this guy?

    Liked by 23 people

    • lotbusyexec says:

      Can we get this wonderful bite to PDJT? Good work TMonroe!!

      Liked by 3 people

    • redzone says:



    • help4newmoms says:

      Agreed. This quote by Comey smacks us right in the face. Comey is concerned about an ongoing fbi investigation into a potential Clinton presidency but has no issue with an ongoing investigation into a Trump presidency. The only explanation must be Comey’s warped point of view…trump isn’t actually the president in his mind so it is A-ok to investigate him. So horribly awful that people can not see their, blatant hypocrisy.


  5. The Boss says:

    The entirety of the conspiracy against President Trump and the United States of America is becoming more sharply focused and defined. The granular details (documentary evidence) are forming a solid, irrefutable underlying foundation of names, dates and criminal motivations.

    IMHO we are not far from reading or hearing a devastating ‘elevator pitch” that even the willfully blind or less-informed citizen will understand.

    Liked by 4 people

  6. Herbert Kroll says:

    Insert the words ‘sex scandal’, add some vague gory details and people will pay little or no attention to whatever else is described. The more people fantasize the better…Did the Clintons really mind that much about the exposure of Bill’s sexual behavior, true or rumored, when it’s a perfect decoy? The whole Lewinsky thing… it worked perfectly as a cover-up of true crimes the Clintons committed before and during his presidency.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. farrier105 says:

    There is no way those people thought, or were even told, that there was “no way she (Hillary) would lose.” That can no longer serve as a premise for anything these people did. If they actually thought that way, they would never have endangered themselves or their careers in this manner. You get into something like this and it goes sideways there is no telling how far down the line the Powers that Be who started this thing will try to wipe it spotless clean, which always means people die. You know, like entire SEAL teams die. Like JFK witnesses die. People got into this because they received orders. Once received, they had to carry them out. Not to carry them out would result in the same sanctions as the op going sideways. It’s always a Catch-22 for the operatives at, or near, the bottom. Comey, Strozk, Page, etc.–they’re closer to bottom than people think.

    We know the Powers that Be were not certain she would win as Christopher Steele reportedly testified at his recent London deposition in the Russians’ lawsuit against Buzzfeed, et. al. They did all of these things so that a Trump victory could be painted as the work of the Russian government thus paving the way to eliminate the Trump Administration and install another under emergency measures–Continuity of Government. Hell, they could put Obama back in if they wanted, which leads one to wonder just what outcome they wanted in Election 2016. Let Trump get in. Get him out through a Russiagate scenario, and they put in anyone, not necessarily Hillary, who just might be so mentally unhinged (Podesta called her “psychotic”) to put in charge. The thing is, we don’t know WHAT the “secret societies” think about these things. We can guess, but we don’t know for sure. What we do know is a lot of decisions that certain people near the bottom rung of this thing made hurt Clinton’s chances, too.

    1. Going public with Hillary Email 2.0 when all they had to do was go the Gang of 8 citing Hatch Act considerations for secrecy. I cite as evidence that this was cleared by someone above Comey the fact that the jackass is still alive.
    2. The media produced polls so damn cooked that they had to be lying about how certain it was Hillary would win. What those polls did was suppress her vote. Hillary lovers in significant numbers likely stayed home and got ready for the victory parties and didn’t bother to vote. That was deliberate and no one producing the polls has bothered to explain just how those polls got so out of line.
    3. No one paid Obama to tell that teen interviewer that illegal aliens should go ahead and vote just a few days before the election.

    Liked by 7 people

    • I hope that NY agent is being protected with high security! Someone would like him to disappear..

      Liked by 2 people

      • John Bosley says:

        He may still have a copy of Wieners email hard drive as an insurance policy.
        That could be on trip wire to the net incase he gets Arkincided.
        There is more than one way to skin a cat.

        Liked by 3 people

      • farrier105 says:

        I don’t know who would be protecting him. All he did was try to cover his ass since the laptop was his responsibility at SDNY. He got Comey’s office on the phone once, as I recall, and Comey found out McCabe and Strzok were sitting on it for a month. The agent is bound by secrecy with penalty of jail, loss of pension (worse), and firing. It is also grand jury material. His lips are sealed. But, as you see, someone went around Comey and told McCabe to sit on the laptop and NOT TELL COMEY. This is how these things roll. Someone on top cut out Comey for some reason. This put Comey on the hot seat, so he starts scrambling around.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Zorro says:

        How do we know the NY agent hasn’t disappeared?

        Liked by 3 people

    • TheLastDemocrat says:

      I believe they truly believed they were going to win.

      They were using well-known polling methods, and neatly calculating where to add just enough votes to clear the hurdle.

      We know that there was almost no way to use established approaches and poll the Monster Vote. They were just a little bit off here, a little bit there.

      They are now so emboldened that, I believe, they will not bother with this barely-detectable fraud. I believe they will do it like the Banana Republics: the tyrant wins with 80+ percent of the vote. If you complain, you will be labeled “racist.”

      They are finding voter fraud in the range of tens of thousands in Texas. California: no one is even seriously looking, but their Su-Moto-Su-Voto program most likely includes Hiraly’s 3 million popular vote margin.

      Their mistakes: not getting Hiraly to decline to run, and carrying on with the polling-based barely-win-with a handful-of-fake-votes strategy.

      2020: wins will NOT be by 2%; they cannot afford that margin; and, they HAVE to have a reasonably desirable nominee – that is their big weakness right now. AND: Hiraly has NO negatives now that she did not have in 2016! Kamala = yes. Biden = yes. Beto = Yes. Liawatha = yes. All of them have serious negatives, vis-a-vis Trump, but Hiraly is a known quantity.

      And it is do or die: win by fraud, or have -as noted- it all unravel: FISA abuse, then U1, then Fast/Furious, then IRS targeting, then BLM/Bundy and other BLM, then ammo hoarding, funneling intellectual property to China for dollars, funneling military intelligence to China for dollars, Benghazi and secret perpetual-war deals with Iran and Turkey, Poppy business through Afghanistan, etc.

      A major Voter Fraud case would run for years, if it ever got legs. By then, the fix would be in: Swamp cemented in place as secure as ever.

      Liked by 3 people

      • farrier105 says:

        Then why run such large risks to execute an espionage operation this stupid? Who does this if they can pad the votes cast for their candidate with this much precision?


    • nimrodman says:

      “… no one producing the polls has bothered to explain just how those polls got so out of line “

      Here’s the explanation:

      we’re lying …
      we’re lying …
      we’re lying …
      we’re lying …
      we’re lying …
      we’re lying …
      “polls tighten up(TM) as the election nears” …
      … so everyone is fooled that we weren’t lying all along

      That’s how


  8. wodiej says:

    How much will it take before something is done? I literally pray for justice from God. We don’t seem to be getting it otherwise.

    Liked by 5 people

  9. fred5678 says:

    This scandal is just too big and too complicated for average citizens to absorb and appreciate, and too much for just one movie, as “All the President’s Men” basically told that story.

    We will need a 12 week mini-series, with handouts and episode summaries, to follow the outrageous details. And all Americans NEED to understand.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Ospreyzone says:

      Here’s a thought. Wouldn’t it be nice if a wealthy conservative would back a captivating documentary, using the facts as we know them? It could be directed by Dinesh D’Souza.

      Then, hand out free tickets to include popcorn, to thousands of liberals on the streets in deep blue cities and large college campuses. Expose the “masses” that have no idea what’s been happening to the glaring truth for once.

      Liked by 3 people

      • BroMole says:

        I think you vastly overestimate their willingness to hear and absorb it. This stuff is right out in the open and yet it really has not moved anyone in either direction. My left-leaning friends really do believe they are fighting to restore law and order. No amount of itemizing how its being destroyed right now will convince them otherwise.

        Liked by 2 people

      • beach lover says:

        Reminds me of the Dinesh movie about Hillary. There were a few AA couples seated at the beginning of the movie, I assume because they thought it would be complementary of her.
        After a few minutes all but one couple got up and left.


  10. Mike L DelMarcelle says:

    The laptop containing evidence that members of congress went to Epstein’s island would explain their crazy behavior towards POTUS. IE: Adam Schiff

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Publius2016 says:

    SDNY wanted Comey to pass on case so future administration could not reopen investigation…Uniparty Deep State Think Tank Black Ops has cover for cover for cover…

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Cheesehead54016 says:

    Thanks Sundance. The part where you mention that the laptop was not fully investigated or disproven to have criminal emails and then turned over by SDNY and essentially buried……………… that is a smoking gun and when dies it reappear? Who would have the ability to make it reappear? Horowitz, Huber, Judicial Watch /Fitton???? Can we get some feedback on that? Great analysis Sundance. Thx.

    Liked by 5 people

  13. gnadfly says:

    Who has/where is the laptop?

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Old Lady says:

    I would be willing to bet Rosenstein wore a wire when he took Mueller to visit President Trump.

    Liked by 2 people

    • BitterC says:

      Maybe. I DO think Mueller was a party to the wear a wire convo, as it was the day of his interview. I think they were plotting the Plan B (Special Counsel) if they couldn’t get Plan A (Mueller as FBI Dir). My understanding is PDJT told Mueller no dice when the interview ended so they regrouped & next day he was named SC

      Liked by 2 people

    • rayvandune says:


      Remember, Hillary said “If that &@!! bastard wins, we will all swing from nooses!” She didn’t say “We’ll all be in big trouble”, or even “We’ll all go to jail.” Nooses.

      Every time you hear about some truly despicable traitorous act of the Deep State, and think to yourself “Oh, no American law enforcement officer could be that corrupted / that crazy / that big a traitor, remember Hillary’s choice of words, and correct yourself: “Yes, these people indeed could, because they probably thought their life depended on it!” And they were probably right.


  15. Christine says:

    Brilliant summary, Sundance!

    Several months ago, Real Clear Investigations published this excellent detailed analysis on the Weiner laptop investigation farce. I’ve kept it handy, praying the laptop scandal would pop up again, and that justice will finally be served.


    Liked by 1 person

  16. Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

    “To be great is to be misunderstood.”

    -James “B is for Breathtaking” Comey

    Liked by 2 people

    • Risa says:

      Well, since we have no difficulty understanding who and what Comey the weasel is, according to his definition he is not great. At least not according to any positive interpretation of the word “great”.

      Liked by 1 person

  17. Paprika says:

    OK, here’s something else that keeps bothering me about about this whole laptop mess besides the many things that have come out and been researched. Just a few basic questions that I’m sure have been addressed, but somehow I’ve missed the answers.

    The basement server supposedly had 60,000 or so plus or minus e-mails. 1/2 were deleted and bleached by Clinton lawyers and team as just being “personal about yoga and wedding plans”. Besides the point that was illegal as her server and e-mails were under a congressional subpoena, we still have a math problem to contend with.

    The Wiener laptop supposedly had 600,000 “Clinton Related” e-mails that cam from the basement server. Let’s cut that in half just in case. That still leaves 300,000 “Clinton Related” e-mails. See the problem? Server = either 60,000 in total or 30,000 “State Department-work related” e-mails/ laptop low ball # = 300,000 e-mails. 300,000 – 60,000= 240,000 new and different e-mails.

    Why were these e-mails not on the server?

    How could the FBI say that the laptop e-mails are just duplicates of what they already had from the server when there are 240,000 more of them than what was supposedly on the server?

    If not on the server, where did Huma get them?

    What was in those extra 240,000 e-mails? Wedding plans or work related?

    Should not the State department be worried about that? Much less FBI, DoJ, and et al?

    Was Hilliary’s GalPal or pedo hubby ever questioned or charged for having State Department work related e-mails on their unsecured laptop?

    Wiener’s lawyer handed over the laptop. Do you reckon he did that without making a copy?

    Did anyone ever ask him?

    So many questions, so few answers.


    • John Bosley says:

      Huma and Anthony probably worked out a scheme to forward all of Hilldawgs emails from that server as a backup , in case Hillary ever decided to silence either one of them.
      Remember, they have a child at that point in time.
      Some people like to protect their offspring, that changes the dynamics of everything they do going forward.
      They more than likely wanted to redo that deal with the Devil herself.


      • covfefe999 says:

        That’s an interesting theory. I’m surprised Huma is still working for Hillary. Maybe it’s a case of “keep your enemies closer”?


        • beach lover says:

          Who else is gonna hire her? She is so corrupted it’s not even funny. (she lied to the FBI for one) Plus she has the problem of a husband and his pedophile issues that were accepted by her for far too long.

          Hillary losing the election was a nightmare for more than Hillary.


          • John Bosley says:

            Huma is like a mouse in a cage with a snake.
            She has to keep tap dancing around so as not to disturb the serpent.
            Although the serpent has one eye on her all the time.


    • icehole3 says:

      I believe Trump has a copy of Hill’s server and Weiner Laptop.


    • NJF says:

      We have no idea how many emails were actually on Hillary’s server. Likely the 60,000 number was simply made up. How would we know? all the evidence was destroyed. We are forced to accept that there were 60,000 and that she deleted 30,000.

      However, the difference in the numbers likely stems from the fact that the server continued long after Clinton left the state dept. And the backup to Weiner’s laptop likely continued as well. Why wouldn’t it? Its my understanding the “investigation” focused only on the time period she was with the state dept. Emails after she left the administration are likely even more damaging than the ones revealed through the investigation. We already can envision the quid pro quo from her time as SoS, imagine the deals being made in anticipation of her becoming POTUS.



      • beach lover says:

        And before. She and Bubba were up to some bad things from the time he left the WH. Think CF. I always think first of money. They needed money. Remember she said they were broke.

        The worst corruption started in 1999 at least… probably before. How much of that is on the web, is debatable. But, you know Huma had to have been collecting all correspondence for safe keeping for her boss.


  18. Right to reply says:

    “Assuming, as nearly everyone did, that Hillary Clinton would be elected president of the United States in less than two weeks, what would happen to the FBI, the Justice Department or her own presidency if it later was revealed, after the fact, that she still was the subject of an FBI investigation?”

    And yet it was fine to do it to Trump!


  19. Eastender says:

    Wow…excellent article, Sundance, thank you for laying it out so clearly. Gee, perhaps some of our elected officials serving on powerful investigative committees may understand what has transpired and actually do something about it. Sadly, I’m somewhat skeptical about that happening.


  20. abel says:

    excellent work maestro(sundance).

    pres has the weiner laptop intel? thats why the extreme long game being played?


  21. Old Lady says:

    So what happens to David Kendall and Hillary? Nothing if we leave it to the DOJ.
    Instead, read P salm 10:12-15. All of us need to call on the Lord with this.


  22. There is not enough thanks, gratitudes and accolades that can be expressed to Sundance for the investigative work done. If the incoming AG does not immediately act on the evidence provided, we as a country are doomed. SAD. The only thing left for us to do is pray.

    Liked by 1 person

    • covfefe999 says:

      Don’t give up hope. We need to make sure Trump is elected in 2020 and we need to grab back the House majority. If Barr ends up being a dud Trump can get a new AG. We have a lot of work to do, it will take decades to drain this swamp, but we must do it. Vote smartly, educate others, run for office yourself. We’ve taken a crucial step electing Trump, let’s follow through. (holding up my cup of coffee)

      Liked by 1 person

  23. covfefe999 says:

    Love this: Please note that at no time in the FBI is anyone directing an actual investigation of the content of the Clinton emails. Every single second of every effort is devoted to shaping the public perception of the need for the investigation.

    THANK GOD TRUMP WON. We would never know ANY of this had Clinton won.

    Liked by 2 people

    • covfefe999 says:

      WE need more good people in the FBI. It pains me that we’re reliant on just a few who are willing to be whistleblowers to do the right thing, it seems the vast majority are narcissistic Strzok types.


  24. snellvillebob says:

    When Hillary Clinton was fired during Watergate for removing documents from the National Archive to prevent President Nixon from having a lawyer during his congressional hearings, she was carrying her box of personal items out of the building and shouted back over her shoulder “I will be back. I just met a man in Arkansas who is going to be president”.
    How did she know at that time? Bill was Governor of Arkansas.
    This incident not only haunts me but scares me.


    • Daniel says:

      The selections for who will be president are made well in advance of any one election. They are, most likely, queued up by perhaps as many as three of four terms in advance.

      And when I say this, there is often genuine competition within parties and between parties, but as we saw in the 2016 election as we watched both the Democrats and the Republicans in their respective primaries, it was clearly shown by Sundance and others that Hillary and Jeb Bush were already decidedly going to be selected for the general election. The Democrats simply cheated and the Republicans attempted to stack the deck.

      Liked by 1 person

    • dd_sc says:

      Bill wasn’t AG of Arkansas until 1977, his first term as governor would be 1979-1981.


  25. Bulldog84 says:

    Based on everything we know about this, Comey and Strzok should be charged with committing perjury.

    How interesting that the FBI claimed to be overly concerned about an honest case agent having classified information from the Weiner laptop on an unauthorized work station, when it seems no one in the FBI gave a darn about HRC having classified information on an unauthorized server.

    Reviewing the SDNY’s involvement (both FBI and DOJ) in the Weiner laptop escapade makes me think POTUS had the right idea in making Rudy Guilani part of his legal team. Rudy undoubtedly knows where all of the proverbial bodies are buried in that district. If any charges against POTUS originate in SDNY, the first defense witness who should be called is that FBI case agent who knew what was on the Weiner laptop. That’s what I’d do.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Rileytrips says:

      You KNOW that as soon as the Mueller Special Counsel wraps up, the SDNY will ramp up its own investigations and indictments on the Trump campaign, inauguration, Trump businesses and Foundation, Trump taxes, Trump family members, Trump’s business associates over the years, etc…. They are getting it all ready now. They are working with the DNC and Schiff’s House Intelligence Committee on all this to try to destroy the President and impeach him before 2020.


      • NC Patriot says:

        —-And you can believe POTUS knows this and is prepared with a cadre of attorneys. POTUS focus recently on Schiff in tweets,etc tells me Schiff is being watched and needs to prepare himself to be exposed in areas where he does not want the exposure. Mark my words.


  26. iconoclast says:

    The sanctimonious Cardinal Comey was the linchpin for the Clintons. He enabled and abetted their corruption and thought he was paving the way for her election. But he screwed it up.

    Now Comey’s mask has been removed and the world sees him for the cheap and phony political hack he is.

    Excising and exposing Comey will be near the top of PDJT’s legacy to our nation.

    Liked by 2 people

    • snellvillebob says:

      Comey was a Mueller promotion. As director of the FBI, Mueller investigated the largest ever money laundering conviction of $1.8 billion against the bank HSBC while Comey was making $5 million at Lockheed steering Hillary’s state department no-bid contracts to them.
      No one at HSBC did a single minute of prison.
      Soon after the fine was levied, Comey joined the HSBC board of directors.
      When Mueller left the FBI, he became HSBC’s head lawyer and Comey replaced Mueller as Director of the FBI. They are both in the Clinton pocketbook and the American people are being treated as fools.

      Liked by 1 person

  27. f.fernandez says:

    If you believe any portion of Eric Prince’s claim, you must believe it all (and I do). With that being said, this is more than just money laundering, Pay to Play, etc. We’re talking about a concerted effort with crimes involving children. Let that sink in………….

    Will that ever see the light of day in a public investigation? Nope. That laptop was most likely destroyed while they had control over the DOJ (prior to Jan 2017)

    Liked by 2 people

    • Zorro says:

      Upon re-reading the Prince excerpt I got a feeling that there’s some Dem pols in laptop data like Menendez, Given the pronouncements of Punchy Pilate Jerry “No Nads” Nadler I wouldn’t be surprised if he is involved, just looks the type.


    • dd_sc says:


      “The amount of garbage that they found in these emails, of criminal activity by Hillary, by her immediate circle, and even by other Democratic members of Congress was so disgusting

      Garbage, and disgusting aren’t the sort of adjectives used to describe money laundering, pay-for-play etc …. And I suspect that the criminal activity is not restricted to Democrats.

      Liked by 1 person

      • beach lover says:

        Bingo. There are surely some high powered money people.. lobbyists and big donors also involved. No pols would expose themselves to something like this without some insurance that both sides were partaking of the festivities.


  28. iwasthere says:

    Sessions, Ryan, McConnell, McCarthy – should all be held in the deepest contempt by all true Americans. Mueller is so ridiculously conflicted he should be up on charges and flogged out of town. Where is the Judicial branch calling out that usurper?? Where was the FBI response when the IC-IG showed them the China ‘malware’ in the Clinton email server – forwarding all her emails in real time to a front company in northern VA? Now that should have been cause for a Stone class pre-dawn raid on those offices and immediate arrest of the real flight risk of China’s spys. Nope, Nothing. All allowed to get away – all in the cause of yet another Clinton cover-up. You know, because the truth would be such a national embarrassment, and our precious ‘institutions’ at DOJ – Oh my! I have little faith that AG Barr will strip it down to the rails – as required to restore trust – for those same reasons. Just look at all the people involved. And yes Sundance, you can take it to the bank that something just ‘happened’ to the laptop because it’s either destroyed or next to the Arc of the Covenant. There might be some classified information on it so the NY FBI field office needs to wipe it’s backup? How freaking stupid do they think we are? /Rant-off. Anyways, you’re a national treasure Sundance – keep up the fight.


    • John Bosley says:

      I would love to believe Wikileaks Julian Assange has a copy of that hard drive and is willing and able to leak it to the Net should he be liquidated.
      Wishful dreaming on my part but then I always was a sucker for Mel Gibsons’ movie “Conspiracy Theory “.


  29. Genie says:

    I need X-ray glasses to see what’s under all the redactions. I promise not to look at Clinton with them.


    • beach lover says:

      Wouldn’t that be nice!! Can you imagine knowing all that is just in the documents we have seen? Enough to know what we suspect and probably a whole lot more.


  30. Daniel says:

    Re: “Both of these cannot be true”

    Sundance, you’re wrong. They can both be true. Different email clients store email in different ways. What’s more, email stored on a server is absolutely stored differently from email stored on clients. And Hillary Clinton had been running her email services first locally on an old PowerMac, then later running on a Dell server (locally) likely running Windows and likely Exchange, then later hosted professionally on a Dell server (remotely) also likely running Windows and Exchange.

    It’s hard to know if the three known servers hosted redundant data but given they were three separate systems run at different times, they not likely share metadata and the Microsoft servers will have already utilized deduplication in the mail store database. So it depends largely on how [methods] email was extracted from the servers as to whether they could easily make matches against other, similar emails.

    Meanwhile, the Weiner laptop was apparently the recipient of an email forwarding rule on one or more other computers. This, for the most part, would have homogenized the data format as it was all in a single format and became a single, searchable database for the authorities to review.

    Without some essential technical understanding the the technology, I wouldn’t be so quick to say things like “they both can’t be true.” They absolutely can for precisely the reasons I detailed above.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Zorro says:

      Explain the FBI/Strzok wizardry construct.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Daniel says:

        Wizardry? I don’t follow. I don’t identify magical thinking when it comes to information technology.

        And after re-reading my overview of email technologies and how/where they apply, I realize I didn’t complete my thoughts on the matter.

        They can both be true if one party (non-expert) is told one something which is then misinterpreted. There are many reasons both can be “true.” But as a guy who has spent pretty much his entire working life in IT and related tech (and from about the age of 16, my time in the Navy and now at the age of 50) I find the biggest problems of fact occur when a non-tech executive type completely fails to understand what he is told and then makes claims and assertions based on when he thinks he knows. And in the case of Comey’s assertions, he probably didn’t hear words like “we might be able to” or “it looks like we will…”

        Don’t get me wrong. I’m all for seeing the guilty parties hang. But just as in the case of the Virginia governor, there’s absolutely room for communications and other errors of understanding along the way. I don’t like to see bad people get hung for the wrong reasons and definitely not into lumping uncertain evidence in with other evidence which forms a preponderance.


    • TexanInFL says:

      You don’t need some to say “This is true” but this is true. I manage systems and email for a government agency (and have done so for private companies). You are correct.


  31. Bogeyfree says:

    So why does JW not just file a FOIA request for all emails contained on the Weiner laptop that included any government officials name on it?


    • Daniel says:

      Who says they didn’t? If you have followed Judicial Watch, you will know they have lots of FOIA requests out at all times and many never get a response and others take an exceedingly long time to get a response with useful information. They just report on what they are actually given.

      Liked by 1 person

  32. Zorro says:

    We all know this is the C word, Corruption. Putting Cold anger and frustration aside, I would suggest that Sundance deserves the P word, Pulitzer.


  33. I will just place this right here…


  34. Zippy says:

    “There definitely was something that somebody didn’t want found.”

    I wonder what that was…

    Email Provider VFEmail Suffers ‘Catastrophic’ Hack
    12 Feb 19


    Email provider VFEmail has suffered what the company is calling “catastrophic destruction” at the hands of an as-yet unknown intruder who trashed all of the company’s primary and backup data in the United States. The firm’s founder says he now fears some 18 years’ worth of customer email may be gone forever.

    “At this time, the attacker has formatted all the disks on every server,” wrote VFEmail. “Every VM [virtual machine] is lost. Every file server is lost, every backup server is lost. Strangely, not all VMs shared the same authentication, but all were destroyed. This was more than a multi-password via ssh exploit, and there was no ransom. Just attack and destroy.”

    “I don’t have very high expectations of getting any U.S. data back,” Romero said in an online chat.

    Asked if he had any clues about the attackers or how they may have broken in, Romero said the intruder appeared to be doing his dirty work from a server based in Bulgaria (94.155.49[9], username “aktv.”)

    “I haven’t done much digging yet on the actors,” he said. “It looked like the IP was a Bulgarian hosting company. So I’m assuming it was just a virtual machine they were using to launch the attack from. There definitely was something that somebody didn’t want found. Or, I really pissed someone off. That’s always possible.”


  35. citizen817 says:

    Liked by 2 people

  36. Justin Green says:

    Then the Weiner laptop was stolen.
    Hillary’s laptop was “lost in the mail”.
    Devices were destroyed with hammers.
    Hard drives “wiped with a cloth”.
    33,000 yoga emails missing.

    Yet nobody has been charged with destruction of evidence, obstruction of justice, etc.

    DNC servers never examined by the FBI (not that it would have been an honest examination anyway). Yet they run with the “Rushans Hacked Muh Servers” narrative.

    Democrats are the Degenerate Party.


  37. G. Combs says:

    eagledriver50 says:
    “Just an observation from all the Treepers and a thought popped into the brain matter…If the FBI agent was so distraught about “wiping” his computer of all evidence, and since this is NEW YORK…I do believe that one individual has ALL THE EMAILS…RUDY GUILIANI…PDJT hired him in April ’18? and has kept him on staff….”


    1. President Trump made RUDY GUILIANI his CYBER CZAR in January BEFORE the inauguration.

    2. The much hated Jeff Sessions FIRED the U.S. Attorney in the Southern District, Preet Bahara.

    3. Sessions REPLACED HIM with RUDY’s LAW PARTNER, Geoffrey Berman!!!
    News Week — Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Wednesday named Geoffrey Berman to succeed Preet Bharara as U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York [Manhattan] on an interim basis

    REMEMBER weenie Wiener’s computer was picked up in MANHATTAN NY.
    Daily Mail UK, Aug 7, 2017 – “Disgraced politician Anthony Weiner has been ‘truly ostracized’ in his Manhattan apartment building, residents have claimed…” The Mail also reported “…Anthony Weiner has been spotted in New York City on crutches…”


  38. Doug Amos says:

    The superior man seeks the truth and he is right here and he finds it. Never before have the sewer rats had to deal with the kind of brilliance like that that stands in their way today. Pulitzer indeed, S D!


  39. Pale rider says:

    This reminds me of a business. When the head guys screw up they get fired but the lower people get a reprimand unless directly involved. Jail is not an option just removed from power, as Clintons have been. Jail is for the peasants or to shame someone like wiener.
    I keep trying to find perspective to measure this all because the frustration is overwhelming. I hung all my hope on Trump and Sessions now with the Barr appointment I’m letting go to keep sane.


  40. BSR says:

    This whole Carlos Danger thing has bothered me again and I need to vent.

    Wiener is guilty as sin at having a low IQ in all of the portrayals we see of him and I think it’s a total act that is 100% phony. I’ve always considered him this passive aggressive type who plays dumb and portrays this good guy image so that he’s avoided for any real responsibilities. Too good of a guy to fire but not capable enough for the heavy duty stuff is the act. There’s tons of guys out there who do this same thing among his generation and they never have an opinion on polarizing topics and always vote based on prevailing winds. It’s the male version of what women have been known to consider “fake” when referring to other women who routinely patronize others by putting on an act. The point is there’s tens of thousands out there just like him who make the number of liberal supporters always appear larger than it really is while guys like us here are the problem for giving a damn. I absolutely despise men like him. I won’t even mention what I think of this whole obsession with younger females. But don’t let yourself think the obsession and the act he’s guilty of aren’t related. That IS his passion. He just didn’t mean for her to be underage.


  41. Piggy says:

    This is another example of why the FBI should be assessed for viability. Does the FBI do what it was intended to do?

    Does anyone think it’s just these people who have neglected their duty and publicly lied? Different names and faces and I bet we get same results.

    Most of DC and government folks use personal devices and accounts for official business emails. Many do it because they believe they’re entitled or it’s convenient and others are just plain lazy. This is at all levels.

    This makes it hard to pursue the nefarious information hiders. If everyone is doing it how do you charge someone with a crime? Comey, Colin Powell, and Obama to name a few have all done official business (classified) on personal email.

    The Shrillary decided to one up them with an entire server to hide information. We all know this is hardware and not just email. Real intent to hide bribes and cherry pick public information for personal gain. The server alone should’ve been seized and investigated as soon as it was known to exist. But this is hard to do when all of them are breaking the rules.

    No matter how bad I want some of these people in jail I just don’t believe it’s going to happen. I don’t see how it can. So instead I hope events like this can lead the way to address a much bigger threat to Americans and that’s the progressive administrative state. Start with shutting down the FBI.


  42. It appears the DOJ/FBI hierarchy’s objective all along was to protect the Clintons at all costs and PDJT just happened to be in-the-way. Like the Godfather – “Its nothing personal – its just business.”

    I could care less if the Clintons skate – they’re going to die soon. However, I want to see every single illegal leaker and law breaker in the FBI/DOJ, Congress and prior administration FRY.

    Lets see what kind of cloth AG nominee Barr is made of.

    Liked by 1 person

  43. Zorro says:

    McCabe is in this even deeper than I thought.

    Liked by 1 person

  44. wightmanfarm says:

    Well, this doesn’t look good. But, nothing will happen.


  45. Noble Patriot says:

    So, the question remains, “Who has so much dirt on key law enforcement/FBI agents/Politicians/Journalists that they are effectively blackmailed into silence?” My contention is that it initially goes back to the 1000s of FBI files breached by the Clintons during WJC presidency and this sort of thing is clandestinely still going on today. Massive amounts of information is being amassed by those associated with the Clinton/Obama on key players (good and bad) to keep mouths shut.


    • Judiciary says:

      Noble Patriot, we may never learn the depth of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s evil plots. Look how elaborate and effective was her Russia-Trump collusion scheme, for a time. Blackmail makes a lot of sense when one considers the multiple scandals she was the center of but from which she wriggled away Scot free.


  46. magacombover says:

    Did the FBI obtain a “copy” or the actual laptop?


  47. Mr Jim77 says:

    And…nobody will suffer any consequences for their malfeasance.


  48. Judiciary says:

    Where would we be without Juducial Watch, Nunes, and Sundance? When you add to this the slap on the wrist, if that, for the Awans and the ballot-destroying witch of Broward Co, Brenda Snipes, all because Debbie Wasserman-Schultz has Assistant US Attorney for DC, Steven Wasserman, for a brother, it confirms the two-tiered just-us system still in existence post Obama.


  49. HickTick says:

    Remember before the news broke , Rudy was on FOX all giddy about a bomb shell that was coming . You could tell he had seen the evidence and most likely was given a copy before it was
    turned over to the FBI . The NY guys knew how big this laptop deal was and they knew once it was turned over to Washington , You better keep a copy .
    Not long after that Rudy was hushed up about it claiming it was leaked to him illegally , blah , blah . He was in big trouble , wink , wink . I believe Rudy secured a copy for PDJT
    I expect Barr to see the evidence if he has not , soon .

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s