Sheldon’s Folly – Chairman Chuck Grassley Requests Criminal Investigation of Kavanaugh Accuser Jeffrey Catalan…

Mr. Jeffrey Catalan accused Judge Brett Kavanaugh of assaulting a woman on a boat in Rhode Island. Mr. Catalan first sent the accusation to Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, one of the primary Democrat operatives who was helping to construct the attacks against Judge Kavanaugh. Senator Whitehouse simultaneously informed the media and the Judicary Committee of the allegations. Mr. Catalan later recanted his story, saying he made it all up.

Today, Senator Chuck Grassley requested a criminal investigation of Mr. Catalan for making false accusations.

The investigation may also include Senator Sheldon Whitehouse for assisting and promoting the false accusation:

WASHINGTON – The Senate Judiciary Committee today referred for criminal investigation apparent false statements made to committee investigators alleging misconduct by Judge Brett Kavanaugh. In a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and FBI Director Chris Wray, Chairman Chuck Grassley sought a criminal review of the actions by a named individual who provided Congress with the information, diverting Committee resources from an ongoing investigation.

Committee investigators have actively pursued a number of tips the committee has received regarding the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, though the committee has not been able to substantiate any allegations of wrongdoing by Judge Kavanaugh. One tip was referred to the committee by staff for Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I).

While Whitehouse referred the accuser to a reporter, the committee took the claim seriously and questioned Judge Kavanaugh about the allegations under penalty of felony. Judge Kavanaugh denied any misconduct. After the transcripts of that interview became public, the individual recanted the claims on a social media post.

“The Committee is grateful to citizens who come forward with relevant information in good faith, even if they are not one hundred percent sure about what they know. But when individuals provide fabricated allegations to the Committee, diverting Committee resources during time-sensitive investigations, it materially impedes our work. Such acts are not only unfair; they are potentially illegal. It is illegal to make materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements to Congressional investigators. It is illegal to obstruct Committee investigations,” Grassley said in the letter.

Grassley has called on the Justice Department and the FBI to review the matter as a possible violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and 1505, portions of the U.S. code criminalizing the sharing of materially false information with committee investigators and obstruction of proceedings of congressional committees.

Grassley letter to DOJ and FBI is available HERE.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in 1st Amendment, 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Cold Anger, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Election 2018, FBI, media bias, Notorious Liars, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Supreme Court, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

567 Responses to Sheldon’s Folly – Chairman Chuck Grassley Requests Criminal Investigation of Kavanaugh Accuser Jeffrey Catalan…

  1. Troublemaker10 says:

    I must be really stupid. Wouldn’t it be interfering with an FBI investigation to both refer it to FBI and tell accuser to report it to a newspaper at the same time? I’m sure FBI investigators would get a more honest investigation if witnesses they want to question haven’t read the accusers accounting in the paper first.

    Something is wrong with congress. They need to change some ethics guidelines in their policy if they think this would not interfere in an investigation.

    Liked by 21 people

    • ron Milam says:

      This was LEAKED to send a Message to everyone……….do not lie or we will prosecute you. Simply put this was brilliant. The best way to get lying liars to tell the truth is to put the FEAR of God in them, LOL.

      Liked by 50 people

      • Its a good message, but when’s the last time we’ve ACTUALLY seen anything done with these “referred” cases ? Its time to see someone cuffed, stuffed, and perp walked. THAT will send a message their serious. Until then, this is bluster (good bluster, but still bluster)

        Liked by 33 people

      • Rainy says:

        And what about Ford and all her known lies? Gateway Pundit had a post about the door remodel not being the year she said it was and also there’s no record of her being an actual Dr. …..her page at the school was changed 10 days before the hearings…never mind her flying lies.
        Not to fear…we know the last page of this corrupt book called American Politics….GOD WINS!!!

        Liked by 8 people

      • chipin8511 says:

        About time Grassley grew some balls this wacko Dems are out of control squash them like the Chit they are..

        Liked by 1 person

      • De Oppresso Liber says:

        Imagine how much “leverage” President Trump could get if he actually had two or three loathsome TRAITORS prosecuted for sedition…..the rest would be scared schittless, and he would have cooperation (out the a$$!) to go along with the leverage.

        Liked by 1 person

      • jameswlee2014 says:

        I don’t know about ‘leaked’. I’m pretty sure I recently saw Lindsey Graham megaphoning that the Senate had had enough,including the criminal referral referral. They have nothing to gain by hiding it; it would be counter productive, an example is being made. You don’t hide examples, you make fliers and post them in public places. The door is closed. I think he intends to censure Feinstein. I think, sometime in the future when they look back at it, they will not view the mob rule tactics they have brazenly employed, as the deft political move.

        Like

      • Dixie says:

        What’s the reason for not investigating the women making false accusations? Is it just because they are women? If so, that’s unfair.

        Liked by 1 person

    • notunderwhelmed says:

      I think the cure would be to replace the corrupt members themselves by “cantoring” them. Bye bye now! 💋

      Liked by 6 people

      • 813.52 says:

        Thousands of people lose their jobs every day..

        Some are devasted for a while.
        Some are relieved.
        Many move on to bigger and better things.

        So, no. Losing your cushy gov’t job isn’t the cure for this.
        Prison time is.

        Like

    • bitterlyclinging says:

      Playing by the Obama/Rhodes Media Echo Chamber guidelines, Sheldon was.
      No biggie. I’m sure the ‘Shadow Government’ over in Kalorama approved.
      Twas their classic two step. Leak it to David Korn at Mother Jones, go to the FISA court with the ensuing article as corroborating evidence.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Heika says:

      Something is wrong with them alright. They need to put some conservatives in there with the balls to simply follow the constitutional process/the laws. In that case, the dam vote would have/should have gone ahead 2 weeks ago when it should have. Sick of all this pandering and pussyfooting around for what? They are behaving as badly as the Democrats when they fail to follow the laws of the constitution. The Republicans had no right not to vote when they should have. Someone needs to get in there and scrub the walls, the seats, the kitchen, the counters to get the stinking swamp scum out of the place. The ‘bad habits’ of the Democrats have now poisoned the entire place. The Republicans ‘think’ they have to do what they are told. For crying out loud!!

      Liked by 2 people

    • ethicall says:

      Christine Blasey Ford was in on it. Come on. Pundits, including Republicans, need to stop the “she was obviously in pain” so she is credible. She was acting. Maybe Ford cooked up the false allegation of unwanted groping on her own, but once Dianne Fienstein got Ford’s letter a plan was concocted to keep it secret until the judicial vetting process was over and then drop it like a bomb. Delay the confirmation vote as long as possible. Ford’s letter was their golden ticket and Ford actively went along with the Dems plan to delay delay delay. How do we know this?

      When the Republicans contacted Ford to get her testimony, immediately upon learning of her allegations, Ford said she was afraid to fly and could not come to D.C. right away because of that. She would need a week or more to travel there by land. Remember, the plan is to delay delay delay. In reality, during Ford’s testimony, she revealed that she is an avid flier, even to many other countries, and had flown, at least, six times in the last few months, including to the hearing on Thursday! She lied about her fear of flying. She was in on it.

      When the Republicans heard she had a “fear of flying” they sent emails and letters saying, “We will come to you, anytime, anywhere”. Strangely Ford never responded to that offer. In her testimony Ford lied and said she never knew that they had offered to come to her. The whole world knew about it and her lawyers knew about it. And, yes, they told her. She did not respond because the plan was to delay delay delay and here was another opportunity to delay. Ford was in on it.

      And, the coup de grâce, was when, after saying in her little girl voice that she really didn’t remember why or how she got a lawyer, maybe it was advice from her “beach friends”? (voice tilting up like a question) Ford was forced to reveal that Dianne Fienstein, the woman who kept her letter secret for 20 days, until right before the vote to confirm Kavanaugh, was the person who set her up with a radical, leftist, never Trump lawyer named Katz.

      And we don’t need to ask Ford, who is a democrat, if her motivation for coming forward now, versus 36 years ago, was political. She told us it was strictly political in her testimony. She said that the only reason she came forward was to keep [conservative Catholic] Judge Brett Kavanaugh from being nominated and confirmed to the Supreme Court. Read her testimony. Ford was not sympathetic. She lied under oath many times and has viciously harmed Judge Kavanaugh and his family. She needs to be charged and tried. (Hat tip to Prosecutor Rachael Mitchell who, through her methodic, careful questioning, brought two of those lies out into the open. We are grateful.)

      Liked by 28 people

      • Mongoose says:

        If telling falsehoods is good enough for this guy, then Feinkenstein should face treble charges for sponsoring such crap.

        Liked by 4 people

      • Sigh2016 says:

        A friend of mine brought up the fact that if she was concerned about him being in a position of power, why didn’t this come up when he worked for the Bush Administration?

        Liked by 2 people

        • Not2worryluv says:

          If CBF is politically “neutral” why was she keeping up with the list of SC nominees? Did she fete the nominees during the Obama administration? How involved in the DNC has she been and for how long?

          Wonder if her grandmother actually passed and if, in fact, was there a funeral and did she actually attend with a family that she obviously detested. Or did she take the opportunity to advance her political agenda?

          What a tangled web she has weaved!

          Liked by 3 people

      • Monticello says:

        The timing, the professional social media scrub, the lies on flying to delay, no corroborated witnesses, body language analytic destroyed her “credibility. Lies in one thing, lies in all things. Lied about house remodeling timeline forgetting that and flying is publicly accessible info.
        Yeah she’s guilty of a smear and perjury to Congress, She is a far left witch willing to do anything to keep abortions and a 5th Constitutionalist off the SC.

        Liked by 7 people

      • intercesser says:

        Not only all of that , but Ms. Ford also has CIA and pro-abortion connections . She obviously has post-abortion syndrome . She is really angry at whoever got her pregnant , and persuaded her to have an abortion , and then dumped her . She cannot take it out on him , so she takes it out on a good man , because the bad man doesn’t care . We have zillions like her around in this country . BOLO . Beware .

        Liked by 6 people

        • Monticello says:

          Another lie is her “search” for a lawyer and claiming she didn’t know she might need one.
          Her brother is a lawyer….
          And again claiming she didn’t know how or whom to contact.
          Lots of lies.
          Credible? Not at all unless you operate on emotion and not logic like all the useful idiots.
          I used to be an IG investigator in the USAF and she was an act and perhaps “reprogrammed”
          The whole show was a conspiracy and the Senators were complicit, the female lawyer is tied to Hillary.

          Liked by 3 people

          • skifflegirl says:

            Exactly. How does a person born, bred and groomed in the incestuous Maryland/DC area ‘not know how to contact’ her representative? They all know each other!

            Dr. Michael Savage reported that her grandfather was commended by former CIA Director William Casey for his decades of service to the CIA. Her brother is an attorney who worked for Baker, Hostetler – the law firm that created Fusion GPS. Her father operates CIA front companies. Blasey Ford herself apparently works in the CIA undergrad program at Stanford. This whole thing has deep state fingerprints all over it and it stinks.

            Leftists pretend not to know things, indeed.

            Like

      • daizeez says:

        To me she showed no real emotion. A furrowed brow and choppy little girl voice saying “I am terrified” doesn’t cut it. Compare to Kavanaugh and his family. Mitchell asked if she ever told anyone how to take a polygraph test. She said never. I thought it an odd question to ask. Wonder if they were tipped off to something in her past that contradicts that. Her response that it’s easier to fly when it’s to travel on vacation (tee-hee), was absolutely ridiculous. The MeToo movement has made idiots of most MSM, including FOX who also think everyone has a right to be heard no matter how ridiculous the allegations. You have the right to speak, not a right to be heard.

        Liked by 5 people

      • ethicall says:

        UPDATE on my earlier post, paragraph 3. “When Grassley heard she had a “fear of flying” he sent emails and letters saying, “We will come to you, anytime, anywhere”. In her testimony Ford said she never knew that they had offered to come to her. If that was true then why, on September 20th, did Ford respond to that “anywhere, anytime” offer through her lawyer? “Dr. Ford has asked me to let you know that she appreciates the various options you have suggested [to obtain her testimony].” Ford lied about not knowing that Grassley had offered to come to her in California or anywhere. Ford did not respond to his offer, other than to acknowledge it, because the plan was to delay delay delay and here was another opportunity to delay. Ford was in on it.”

        Liked by 4 people

      • chipin8511 says:

        Her brain was wiped and reprogrammed. Now she is several million richer but her family is filthy rich already is future profits they are worried about. The deep-state is pissed they will do anything to protect their ratlines Uranium oil Weapons organ harvesting Pedos. Kavanagh who is one of them turned whitehat he hates the Clintons the revenge this man will inflict on these bastids will be delightful for all of us.

        Like

        • skifflegirl says:

          A week ago, I was stating that this devastating con job against Kavanaugh would cause any comparisons to his mentor, Justice Kennedy – a moderate – to be long gone. I said this would make Kavanaugh not just more committed to his moral convictions, but radicalized against leftists.

          Then he testified, full of emotion, and the pundits used that and said he was too unstable and angry to be on SCOTUS.

          Justice Clarence Thomas went through a similar experience and I bet that it did color his attitudes, so much so that he was the one who warned Matt Drudge in 2015 exactly what the Dems, the GOPe and Hillary Clinton had in store for us once she was coronated. Mass censorship and copyright laws that would make his website illegal and criminalize the sharing of information. Among other things.

          Drudge gave his only interview about his “high level government” source, filmed in shadow, to Alex Jones. He was scared, and so was Justice Thomas.

          Yes, I think Justice Thomas is fair and judicious on the Supreme Court. But he is also behind the scenes, keeping his eye on our enemies from within because he was shown, and lived through, the evil of which they are capable.

          Liked by 2 people

      • mimbler says:

        Great summary ethicall,

        Liked by 1 person

    • yy4u says:

      Last night on Greg Gutfeld’s show, his big buddy Tyrus, cut straight to the heart of what’s wrong with the Ford-Kavanaugh situation. He did not take sides, but rather said the mistake both of them made was having anything to do with the United States Senate. He then went on a rant as to what was wrong with the Senate — both sides — to applause and agreement. He said we need to throw out all the Senators both Dem and Repub. I agree wholeheartedly.

      One side is mean, vicious and without ethics. The other side is a polite to the point of incompetence. Not sure they have any ethics either. How could they when they stand by and let their “friends across the aisle” behave in this fashion?

      Oh, and I saw this a.m. where Nancy Pelosi is now saying Kavanaugh doesn’t belong on the CIRCUIT COURT where he’s served since 2003. My Lord, These people have no shame.

      I hope Kavanaugh is mad enough to — if they do this to them — go after them with everything he has if it takes him the rest of his life.

      Liked by 8 people

      • steph_gray says:

        I like Greg and Tyrus but no, not this fall. We need to fight the DemonRats first and get the RINOs later.

        It’s like when you have a carpenter ant infestation but your house is burning down. First things first!

        Vote across the board R and give that gift straight to VSGPDJT who will know what to do.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. anthohmy says:

    So she left her friend alone in that house with those for big strapping football players to be gang raped? Not an ounce of concern for the friend.

    Liked by 13 people

    • Deusvult says:

      And the friend didn’t worry where Ford is.. neither that nor the next day?
      Beyond their extremist base this is all over bad for Democrats.

      Liked by 6 people

    • Kris says:

      I heard this on Periscope I think it was Brenden Dilly ……. Six people at that “gathering” 4 boys and 2 girls. She doesn’t know how she got there or how she got home. She either came with the girl or one of the boys, correct? Seems reasonable. Ford stated that no music or tv was on downstairs. 3 of the 6 (half the gathering) disappear upstairs. Ford claims she is going to the bathroom but “somebody” pushes her into the bedroom, where there is music playing, locks the door and turns up the music. Not one of the other 3 downstairs apparently hears the “very loud” music coming from upstairs and go up to see what’s going on??? These are teenagers, what are they just sitting in the living room having tea???? Eventually, two boys come downstairs and she comes down and runs out the front door and magically gets home, however, her girlfriend is left there with 4 boys, 2 of which allegedly tried to rape her best friend and never wonders where Ford went or why she left or how is she going to get home???? Hmmm, yeah okaaaay!! 🤔 🤔

      Liked by 22 people

      • beach lover says:

        There are more holes than even this! The house! It had to belong to one of those present, right? So it should not have been too hard to look at all those at the party, right? I have not seen or read any of them saying it was their home. That would be the first place to start.

        Every allegation that is provable has been ignored. They want him to prove he isnt guilty, but she has nothing but “repressed memories”.. that just so happened to be named as Kavanaugh, a few months ago? And who is to say whoever did it … how is it assault? I call BS on it all.

        Liked by 11 people

        • Kris says:

          I agree, one of the boys, conveniently, the one whose name she can’t remember must have lived there!!! Seems like it would be easy enough to find out as she names all of Kavanaugh’s friends but that one??? Who is that other friend???

          Liked by 4 people

        • Heika says:

          Ford lies. She is a liar. They all are.

          Liked by 9 people

          • SalixVeridi says:

            Why did she scrub her social media? Because it would reveal her true self, her true personality. Her entire background is suspicious-given her family is CIA-connected and her husband is involve in abortion products. SHE needs an investigation and quickly. No honest person would be against that, if she had been telling the truth.

            Liked by 4 people

          • beach lover says:

            Not to mention she was coached by her corrupt lawyers that were hired guns by Feinstein! Now how is that fair? If she was telling the truth, she would need no one to tell her what to say and how to say it. She was used. plain and simple. *spit* on the Democrats on the committee for their actions.

            Liked by 1 person

          • celiathaxter says:

            From HotAIr:

            “Ford acknowledged on Thursday that she “went out with” Kavanaugh’s friend “Squi,” a.k.a. Chris Garrett, another invitee to the party, for a few months around that time. As RB says, how would she not have remembered Squi being at the party if she remembered Smyth, her friend Leland Ingham Keyser, and another boy whose name she can’t recall as being there? She remembered some random dude but not the guy she was dating? It’s inexplicable.”

            Christ Garrett. This was the name Ford didn’t want to say, the person she only alluded to. She refused to say his name aloud. Why?

            Liked by 1 person

            • Grassleygirl/Breitbartista/DannyBoy says:

              Isnt Chris Garret the guy that Whelan did the expose on re : the HOUSE.?
              Radical left went nuts attacking Whelan for showing pics of Kav and Garrett side by side.
              The resemblance is uncanny while they were in HS.
              He (Whelan ) either took post down after all the outrage or twitter zapped it.
              There were also pics of the interior of Garretts house, where the floor plan matched to a tee,Fords description.
              Anyone screen grab Whelans tweet? The only thing that perplexes me,is to my memory the classmates last name might have been Barrett not Garret.

              Like

              • Molly Pitcher says:

                If she was 15 and had “dated” this Garrett for a “few months”…he would’ve been at least a couple years older. So this kid is dating an upper classmen from another school and did they go on car dates? Where did they go? Out to dinner? Movies? Did he meet her parents and brothers? what time was her curfew? Did she meet his family?

                Surely that would be kind of a brag to have an “older bf”, ? Wouldn’t all of her Holton-Arms friends be chattin about that?

                Like

            • NC Patriot says:

              Because he had a striking resemblance to to Kavanaugh in High School.

              Like

        • Heika says:

          Bombard always gets it right. Body language of Ford… dead give away https://www.bitchute.com/video/5uv6SHt1Z5Gm/

          Liked by 3 people

          • George Hicks says:

            One thing was apparent right away while watching on the link above…
            Ford had stated she was unaware of the offer by Grassley to fly to her for an interview, But as you watch her while Grassley is telling about their offer (about 3 mins in), there is absolutely no reaction, not even an eye blink.
            If she was unaware or didn’t become aware until after the fact, there would have been some kind of reaction – it would have been a reaction of surprise or at least a reaction of something that would need to be corrected/clarified.

            Like

        • Rockindubya says:

          Repressed memories do not necessarily equate to suppressed reality…
          The (not) Doctor has real credibility issues.

          Liked by 2 people

        • John Titor says:

          The house was “sparsely furnished” too, she remembers details like that but does not remember other details???? In the DC burbs, yeah, right!
          That is the problem with lying, you don’t get your lies straight. Even in print and with plenty of time to prepare. The socialists are just shocked and surprised anyone is questioning their BS story.

          Like

      • margaretwalker says:

        They were all making out, including Chrissy before she went upstairs with her actual boyfriend at the time.

        Liked by 1 person

      • 813.52 says:

        The house would have to be either Kavanaugh’s or Judge’s.

        I doubt if the kid who lived there would sit quietly on the main floor while someone went into an upstairs bedroom and cranked the music.

        The only one who could do that would be the kid who lived there . . .

        Like

    • Amy2 says:

      Not to worry. The imaginary friend wasn’t there.

      Like

    • daizeez says:

      And she never spoke to her about it and vice versa. Wouldn’t you have run down those stairs, grabbed your friend and said Lets get out of here NOW, or run to the nearest phone and call the police, or both. Leaving her there and never asking or talking to her friend about it wouldn’t even be an option.

      Liked by 1 person

      • anthohmy says:

        EXACTLY! And the friend would have remembered the night Ford disappeared into thin air and left her alone with 4 guys whose name she didn’t know.

        Like

    • Diddian says:

      What house? There was no house and there were no four big strapping football players to protect her friend from because this never happened. No specific date. No specific location. No MENTION to a single living human being until 30 plus years after she’s left high school and only then to win an argument against her husband over whether or not to add a second front door to accommodate live-in interns. Just a quivering nest of manipulative emotional display hovering around for a person, place, and time to land on. Her story would never pass muster for a police report and if it ever faced a defense attorney it would be ripped apart as self-serving invention.

      Ford is a fabricator and a faker and most of the dupes who fell for her carefully crafted performance were inclined to because they shared her agenda. The rest are just saps, easily manipulated.

      Liked by 2 people

    • chipin8511 says:

      Wonder what her husband thinks 54 partners before college and another 50 or so good luck with that. She looks 70s not early 50s ridden hard no wonder she doesn’t have a social disease besides being a brain-dead lefty loon.

      Like

  3. zephyrbreeze says:

    Jonah Goldberg (gag) but he’s right on this:

    “But here’s the thing: Virtually any other Republican could have or even would have nominated Brett Kavanaugh, and most of the garbage we’ve heard over the last two weeks — he’s evil, he doesn’t deserve the presumption of innocence, he must be guilty because other men or white men or prep-school men are sexual predators, he’s guilty because Mazie Hirono thinks his rulings on abortion are proof of rapey-ness, he floats on water just like wood, etc. — would be spouted by these people all the same. Sure, you can put some of the blame on Trump for the climate in Washington. You can blame him for making it harder to speak credibly about sexual misbehavior since there are so many credible allegations against him.

    “But you can’t blame him for Democrats believing that Brett Kavanaugh ran a rape gang in high school. Nor can you blame Trump for all of the liberals who know it must be a lie and refuse to say so. That’s on them.

    “Let’s stay on that, because unlike the Ford question, which I think reasonable people can disagree on, the idea that Brett Kavanaugh helped run a regular rape operation is true witch-hunt groupthink. Why not just accuse him of having turned someone into a newt or moth with his blood magic?

    https://www.nationalreview.com/g-file/the-moral-panic-phase/

    Liked by 2 people

    • zephyrbreeze says:

      Actually, several of those conclusions I don’t agree with – FYI.

      Liked by 14 people

    • ron Milam says:

      Goldberg is dumb, its the 5th SEAT……….Not the man…….Kav would have got through easier on the last appointment, and if Gorsuch had of been appointed now they would have done the same thing.

      Liked by 23 people

      • Zabadak says:

        As most Never Trumpers are, he is willfully blind.

        Liked by 13 people

      • imkittymyers says:

        Think of the torture the next nominee to the court will endure.

        Liked by 4 people

        • Dee Paul Deje says:

          That depends on how this shakes out and if whether the scum pay for what they did.

          Liked by 10 people

        • HB says:

          I don’t think they’ll try it again. This is so blatantly obvious to be a farce that the GOP looks ridiculous. Plus, 11/8 is not going to end well at all for Dims. I’m even curious to see if Patty Murray makes it up here in WA.

          Even if Judge Kavanaugh doesn’t make it in I still think it’s their last Hurrah. Dims have two and a half times as many seats to lose. We’re hearing their final wails of death.

          Liked by 7 people

          • GB Bari says:

            Of course they’ll try it again. It’s a proven effective tool in the Left’s toolbox of weapons to use against their ideological enemies.

            Last night President Trump noted that, per a poll of WV People, 58% said they believed Kavanaugh. ONLY 58%. That means 42% don’t recognize this “blatantly obvious” fraud! That’s a significant percentage of a relatively conservative state who took the Dimmicraps bait, hook, line, and sinker.

            Oh, yes, they’ll keep using it until the MSM is shamed into no longer passing it along as “news.”

            Liked by 4 people

            • Based upon numerous conversations with my liberal friends, I have concluded they ALL would rather be WILLFULLY IGNORANT of the facts, rather than actually verifying the BS narrative constantly being spewed by the MSM.

              When I point out things factually false, per CTH, BB, GWP, and other publications, their response is “I can’t rely upon those sites because they are “conservative”

              We have the generational inbred Democrat affiliation, coupled with the sheep blindly following the gospel according to the alphabet channels. Those two factors add up to a bunch of misinformed voters determining our future. Scary chit, right there.

              Liked by 7 people

              • mimbler says:

                That is to a t how my liberal acquaintances view things.

                And when presented with indisputable facts, they will back down, but next time I see one he’s “forgotten” those facts already and is spouting the same nonsense.

                I don’t understand the desire to believe things you know are wrong, but that is the case of every liberal.

                Liked by 1 person

              • Little Berkeley Conservative says:

                My mom is as liberal as they come and she completely believes Kavanaugh. She watches CNN 24/7 and is sick of this crap. They’ve overplayed their hand. I even caught her watching Tucker Carlson the other night.

                Liked by 2 people

            • throughthetreesdarkly says:

              58% of people in WV believe Kavanaugh . There was a large undecided group, not 42% we’re duped!

              Liked by 2 people

              • GB Bari says:

                That’s exactly my point. 42% WERE duped into not believing the evidence that has been clearly spelled out in numerous articles and websites. If they believed the truth and the hard evidence that HAS been presented, there is no excuse for not arriving at the same conclusion as the 58%.

                “Undecided” is merely an excuse to not commit. Undecided means that the aggregate of facts and evidence that completely impeached Ford as a credible witness / accuser has been rejected or ignored by these people. They don’t want to believe the truth, even though they obviously recognize that the testimony from Ford is blatantly weak and full of inexplicable holes.

                Like

          • HB says:

            Thats bad. I didn’t think 42% of WV would believe this crap.

            Liked by 1 person

          • mr.piddles says:

            “I don’t think they’ll try it again.”

            Of course they’ll try it again — if left unchecked. That’s why Grassley’s maneuvers are important, why a public airing of FBI investigative outcome is important. Kavanaugh needs to bring civil suits — multiple. If you’re gonna play this game, defame somebody of this importance, you better be prepared to pay the consequences. It’s basic Law and Order stuff. It can’t become a free-for-all.

            Rumor becomes Fact in the age of Google and Wikipedia. You need to take extreme proactive measures to undo the harm in this case. Extreme measures. Search and destroy with extreme prejudice. “kill -9” for all you Unix guys and gals out there.

            It’s funny. Not too many years ago somebody could quote something on a forum or whatever from a Wikipedia page — often a page that was perfectly reasonable and accurate. The INSTANT response would be “oh, you can’t quote Wikipedia as fact!”. Today it is the public record. Sad.

            Liked by 1 person

        • John Titor says:

          They will not have this process.

          Like

      • Ellie says:

        I agree completely. Especially considering Gorsuch went to the same high school as Kavanaugh, Ford could easily swap their names in her accusation. It is also very suspicious that she first mentioned this “assault” in 2012 when Romney was running against Obama and Kavanaugh was one of his top choices for potential SC nominees.

        Liked by 5 people

        • WSB says:

          This is the start of what would have set the stage for the Kavanaugh fight in 2012 if Romney would have won.

          https://canadafreepress.com/article/the-takedown-of-brett-kavanaugh-started-with-2012-fake-planned-parenthood-a

          Liked by 3 people

        • beach lover says:

          Digging deeper on your point… she only brought this up as a “repressed memory” in couples therapy after 20 some years!! Who would use that as justification after all those years? I say, a liberal whack job, thats who. And I would bet everything I own, that the only reason those notes aren’t put out there is that they don’t even mention Kavanaugh. She has altered her “memory” to appease her liberal lawyers, and the Dems on the Judiciary Committee, probably Feinstein’s staff!

          I am glad to hear Lindsey G this morning say that they are going to get to the bottom of who did all this leaking. He is still pissed. And I believe him. There can be no judicial nominations in the future that will not succumb to these tactics if those that have ruined this good man, gets away with it!

          Like

      • De Oppresso Liber says:

        That is one caveat that truly troubles me……how many there are on “our” side that cannot comprehend that. There are still a large percentage that do not realize this is literally a war for the soul of America, how absolutely despicable and “evil” these America haters are, and therefore how important it is to both vote this November, and also to vote straight ticket republican. We must use word of mouth to try and reach as many of these people as possible, because the stakes could not be any higher, for peace to be maintained.

        Like

    • TwoLaine says:

      No Pants Jonah Goldberg & National Review = G A R B A G E

      SPIT!

      Liked by 6 people

    • LEET says:

      Zephyrbreeze:
      Goldberg is WRONG as usual. POTUS Trump is not the least, tiniest bit responsible for the climate in Washington. POTUS Trump is, however, HUGELY responsible for exposing Washington for the corrupt, giant cesspool it is and for ripping the masks off those who play their part in maintaining and protecting the swamp and that would be Goldberg himself!

      Liked by 23 people

    • Kristin says:

      I refuse the read Goldberg. Period. Period.

      Liked by 5 people

      • Grassleygirl/Breitbartista/DannyBoy says:

        Jonah wrote a huge bestseller about democratic fascism …Then became one.

        Like

        • steph_gray says:

          OMG so true!

          When that book came out I admired him so much.

          I am inutterably sad about the path he has chosen.

          Like

          • Grassleygirl/Breitbartista/DannyBoy says:

            In the end it’s all about the money. And influence of course. I don’t follow Jonah anymore,but have a hunch he had his nose up the fanny of chief “never trumper” Bill Christal.
            Our wonderful VSGPDJT was jut too icky for them.

            Like

    • Alicia Chavetz says:

      Goldberg’s Trump derangement syndrome is so bad, he blames this on Trump. Trump, the guy that has made 2 excellent Supreme Court Nominees. I imagine Goldberg is one of the so-called conservatives that expressed concern that Trump would put a conservative on the Supreme Court. Goldberg at this point is no better then what you get at CNN. A political hack posing as a journalist.

      Liked by 9 people

    • pinecreeksusan@ultraispcom says:

      jonah goldberg is an anti trumper

      would not read his trash
      don’t care what he says
      used to love goldberg,now i would not read anything he writes

      he is what is wrong in this country
      goldberg must be laughing with glee about the demons in the rat party trying to tear down a good man’s reputation such as kavanaugh
      but goldberg is really after trump because of his hatred of trump

      wonder what is in goldberg’s closet

      Like

    • Alicia Chavetz says:

      After giving it more thought, people like Goldberg should shoulder the blame if Trump Kavanaugh does not get nominated. Republicans like Goldberg that continually bash and show no respect for the president are the ones that have helped create this atmosphere.
      If Kavanaugh goes down, one of the finest people I have ever seen will be able to thank people like Goldberg that he missed a chance at being on the Supreme Court. Along with him and his family lives ruined.

      Goldberg should man up and shoulder the blame rather than take the low road and blame it on Trump.

      Liked by 9 people

      • George1 says:

        Exactly AC. People like Goldberg care much more about decorum and being liked by the left than winning. This is why we have lost everything up until Trump came along. We played by Marquess of Queensberry rules while the left beats us with baseball bats wrapped in barbed wire. The so-called conservatives have conserved nothing. They didn’t even conserve the ladies restroom. Most of the name brand conservatives of conservative INC are less than worthless.

        Liked by 2 people

    • TigerBear says:

      This is a conservative news site you posted here?? WHOA, What a big pile of crap that article promotes. If I want BS with my coffee in the morning I’ll sit it in the barn with the real processors of the BS! 😄🙄 plus, I can fertilize my garden with their crap. 😄

      Liked by 5 people

    • pinkbeachlady says:

      Jonah-the-jerk is never-trumper, I’m Never-jonah/NRO

      Liked by 5 people

    • Mayo says:

      Goldberg couldn’t write an article on baking chocolate chip cookies without dissing the President. Can’t stand him.

      Liked by 6 people

    • margaretwalker says:

      Actually Jonah, if any other Republican could have won the election that would be the starter, then they could nominate Kavanaugh. I would add that once the predictable character assassination started by the left , any other Republican President would’ve dropped Kavanaugh like a hot potato and found someone new ,

      Liked by 2 people

      • steph_gray says:

        And then they would have rinsed and repeated for 4 years.

        Agree so much! Just glad Jonah is not one of the globalists in office so we don’t need to vote for him to save the republic.

        Like

  4. Resistwemuch says:

    Pray for Brett Kavanaugh

    Liked by 27 people

    • vexedmi says:

      And family please.

      Liked by 20 people

      • As well as for ANY young man in High School or college today, because 30 plus years from now, his life could be ruined by a SINGLE unsubstantiated allegation of inappropriate behavior.

        I have been saying this to my liberal friends (most of whom have teenage/ twenty something aged children): Does this not concern you that your child’s life can be ruined in such a fashion, WITHOUT due process? Their answer always circles back to the liberal talking points of the MSM.

        EVERY parent in this country should be absolutely LIVID about the kangaroo court we have just witnessed coming out of the Senate Judiciary hearings, and the steam rolling of this BS “Me too” movement. The problem is the hardcore liberals DONT have any issue with it, since it is a conservative judge whose life has been ruined.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Grassleygirl/Breitbartista/DannyBoy says:

          Frankly my fear is that someone is going to be killed by these useful idiots.
          I’m literally drained of tears after this last week. .Real tears ,not the dry ones we witnessed from behind Ms.Fords vaseline smeared glasses.
          The civil war isn’t coming folks. ..It’s here.

          Like

    • Krystal says:

      I lit a candle for him at church yesterday and prayed. Since it was the feast of three of the Archangels I asked St. Michael the Archangel tp give him strength and protection.

      Liked by 14 people

    • wodiej says:

      Yes, every day!! Amen.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Sigh2016 says:

      Isaiah 54:17. No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the Lord, and their righteousness is of me, saith the Lord.

      WE NEED TO STAND ON THIS WORD DAILY IN THE POLITICAL CLIMATE WE ARE IN.

      Liked by 3 people

  5. Don L says:

    And we fretted day and night how outside terrorism was going to do grave harm to our country….meanwhile the inside hate-America cancer was “progressing.” Is that why they call themselves “progressives”?

    Liked by 13 people

    • Ausonius says:

      Islamic terrorists have seemingly been quiet here (not elsewhere, e.g. in recent days plots have been foiled in Holland, Denmark, and the plague continues in Africa and Asia)…but why should they do anything right now, since termitic Dems are gnawing away at America from the inside and trying to cause a collapse through their domination of the “kulcher” and the media and the educational system?

      Knowing that Dems will NEVER defend America, but will bow down and make apologies instead (thank you MAObama), the Islamic terrorists think that they only need to wait and hope America will go really stupid and allow Dems to take over the government completely.

      And don’t tell me that MAObama “got bin-Laden”! If the search had not already been underway for years, he would not have authorized it

      Liked by 5 people

    • Frank says:

      Probably because it sounds better than “metastasizers.”

      Liked by 3 people

    • sDee says:

      The Progressive Party was America’s early Marxist party. FDR consolidated it along with a a few others under the Democrat party.

      Liked by 5 people

    • charliedan says:

      A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.
      An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.
      But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.

      Marcus Tullius Cicero

      Liked by 11 people

      • Ausonius says:

        The quote is actually from a novel where Cicero is the main character: A Pillar of Iron by Taylor Caldwell. (1965) Caldwell was a Conservative, and the novel satirizes and criticizes 1960’s America through its story of Cicero.

        Liked by 4 people

    • Suzanne says:

      They call themselves “progressives” hoping that if they change their label to what they think is a more subtle title you won’t figure out that they are actually communists.

      Liked by 3 people

    • SalixVeridi says:

      They are REgressives!

      Liked by 2 people

  6. SPMI says:

    The Dems are progressive exclusively on
    Hate, Lies, distortion of truth, and deliberate
    Evil.
    Anyone still viewing these things as correct for our country must be criminally insane. The disgust
    Is stupefying and intolerable.
    How can we stop this horror?
    I think it’s way over time to do a once and for all cleanup.
    Gidde up!

    Liked by 3 people

    • USMCLt says:

      “Blood of tyrants” time? Almost there, but I still hold out hope that one man or woman in the Washington Establishment will step forward and do the right thing for our grand Republic. Admiral Mike Rogers was very close to being the kind of hero I’m talking about.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Suzanne says:

        Imho it has become apparent that the Blood of Patriots and Tyrants is the only method which will resolve this. I believe it is impossible to come to any kind of terms with this bunch… they have gone well past the point of no return

        Liked by 3 people

  7. Deusvult says:

    Grassley slapping dims from all sides..
    Bernie…

    Liked by 16 people

    • Bill S says:

      Last Thursday, I wish that Grassley would have asked one of the Democratic Judiciary Committee members requesting a supplemental FBI investigation “if we do this additional FBI investigation, will you vote for Kavanaugh if it proves inconclusive?”. That would e lose them for what we already know-that this is not about seeking the truth, it is about delay and destroy.

      Liked by 5 people

      • Bill S says:

        “expose them” not “e lose them” above. My apologies

        Liked by 3 people

      • Alicia Chavetz says:

        All Grassley had to do is say if we as for an FBI investigation it’s going include the members of this committee. After all, we want the public to know this is a fair process. That would shut down the talk about an FBI investigation fast.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Alicia Chavetz says:

        That would have meant nothing. The only thing that will work is to take some of the people off in Handcuffs and prosecute them. But, with Sessions at the helm, that is a daydream

        Liked by 1 person

        • G. Combs says:

          Sessions is NOT recused from this issue. That takes RosenStink out of the equation.

          Sessions Appointed Stephen Dambruch Interim U.S. Attorney for Rhode Island but I think his time as an interim has run out. Mary Susan McElroy is/was? a Trump nominee to be the US Judge for the District of Rhode Island.

          Wiki seems to show the position vacant so that means the Obummer appointed #2 would be acting U.S. Attorney for Rhode Island…
          😖

          This is why many of us are saying PROSECUTORS and JUDGES are the KEY to draining the swamp.

          If the Prosecutors and judges are crooked then the criminals go free and the innocent get smeared and even go to jail.

          Like

    • Pat Frederick says:

      what is this letter in response to?

      Liked by 1 person

      • WSB says:

        Explained in the letter.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Pat Frederick says:

          yeah i read it twice and he mentions Sanders comments (I haven’t seen those) nor his letter about the supplemental FBI investigation. If the Sanders letter asking about the supplemental investigation was posted I missed it.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Pat Frederick says:

            FTA in The Blaze”
            “In order for the FBI investigation regarding Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to be complete, it is imperative the bureau must not only look into the accusations made by Dr. [Christine Blasey] Ford, Deborah Ramirez and Julie Swetnick, it should also examine the veracity of his testimony before the Judiciary Committee,” Sanders wrote.

            Noting that lying to Congress is a crime, Sanders outlined nine specific instances he believes should be investigated, including five from Kavanaugh’s earlier Senate confirmations in 2004 and 2006, and four from Kavanaugh’s testimony last week. Each of Sanders’ requests stem from unsubstantiated claims.”

            So Sanders wants an ADDITIONAL investigation into Kavanaugh…

            now Grassley’s response makes sense.

            Like

          • WSB says:

            The point of Grassley’s snarky response to Sanders is that Sanders announced immediately after the nomination announcement that he would never support Kavanugh…if so, why would Sanders now be demanding further investigation?

            Grassley is catching Sanders beeing a lying commie.

            Like

        • VegasGuy says:

          “…what is this letter in response to?”

          As WSB states….it is self explanatory….But gave Grassley an opportunity to bitch slap Sanders…& he sure did…LOL

          Liked by 1 person

  8. HJR27 says:

    It would be interesting to know just how many accusatory letters the average lawmaker’s office receives in an average week that get a form letter rubber stamped reply and then are shredded.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Pyrthroes says:

    Though this ghastly charade should never have occurred, we trust Pres. Trump’s finely honed instincts and sagely foresighted policy implicitly. Entering October on the heels of a stunning 4.40% annual GDP growth rate from Dec-2017, we’ll bet he drops several Hammers of Thor on scuttering Rat demagogues before November.

    As an aside, via this current UN gabfest we count over half a dozen VSG one-on-ones with global Chiefs of State, uniformly dead-serious and to the point of complexly related national interests. Compartmentalizing all these strands amidst the most egregious abuse of Congressional prerogatives since 1954 shows executive ability of a very high order.

    Liked by 4 people

  10. wodiej says:

    We don’t know God’s plans but I do have faith and trust in Him taking care of this evil running rampant. The more liberals do, the more we know God’s will is working!

    Liked by 7 people

    • Alicia Chavetz says:

      I have no doubt when the Romans were feeding the Christians to the lions they said the same thing.

      Liked by 2 people

    • we300 says:

      Here’s the thing: God is in control, but He created us in His image, with free will. I interpret that as we need to get up off of our knees and move our asses and get s@&! done for ourselves and stop waiting for God to do things for us. Prayer is great, I’m a big believer and pray daily. But we have work to do if we’re going to save this country and prayer won’t get it done.

      Liked by 2 people

      • SalixVeridi says:

        Pray, and get moving. God doesn’t help those who don’t help themselves.

        Senator Graham on Maria Bartiromo’s show now. He is adamant that he find who leaked another insane story about Kavanaugh and a sexual attack on a boat. The guy has now recanted, but it was sent to the newspapers as a story with no verification. Another blatant attack on Kavanaugh’s reputation with utter viciousness.

        He will also find out who refused to let Ford know that she could have had a private testimony, which looks like it came from Feinstein’s office. He is going after all the abuse of rules of the committee and then out them.

        Liked by 4 people

        • we300 says:

          Yes! I said for years that our side needs to use the Rules for Radicals against the left. This is why President Trump has been so effective, but our side is still standing around clutching our pearls at how “not nice” that makes us look. I believe in warriors. I believe in the warrior spirit and I believe we need to hammer these evil people into the dust and bury them forever with as much force and not nice and more as they use with us.

          Like

  11. Kathkath says:

    Deuteronomy 19:18-20 English Standard Version (ESV)

    18 The judges shall inquire diligently, and if the witness is a false witness and has accused his brother falsely, 19 then you shall do to him as he had meant to do to his brother. So you shall purge the evil[a] from your midst. 20 And the rest shall hear and fear, and shall never again commit any such evil among you.

    Liked by 7 people

    • Sneaky Pete says:

      ah, the good old days.

      Liked by 2 people

    • CharterOakie says:

      This

      Like

    • P says:

      Deuteronomy 19: 15-21 (KJV)
      15 One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established.
      16 If a false witness rise up against any man to testify against him that which is wrong;
      17 then both the men, between whom the controversy is, shall stand before the LORD, before the priests and the judges, which shall be in those days;
      18 and the judges shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, if the witness be a false witness, and hath testified falsely against his brother;
      19 then shall ye do unto him, as he had thought to have done unto his brother: so shalt thou put the evil away from among you.
      20 And those which remain shall hear, and fear, and shall henceforth commit no more any such evil among you.
      21 And thine eye shall not pity; but life shall go for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.

      Like

  12. Mike Britton says:

    Wonder how quickly Sessions will recuse himself from the Whitehouse investigation

    Liked by 1 person

  13. PowerCord says:

    Sequence of events of this diabolical plan:
    1. The FBI conducts yet another investigation.
    2. The FBI decides it needs more agents to conducts these stupid investigations.
    3. The FBI bloats its staff with junior agents like Comey, Rosenberg, etc…
    4. The riff with the FBI goes on ad infinitum…

    Like

  14. Here’s an article from the Daily Mail about the trollop Swetnik who has quite the past herself.

    Soon all of them will discover that people who liv in glass houses should definitely not throw stones.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6223443/Kavanaugh-accuser-accused-engaging-unwelcome-sexually-offensive-conduct-former-job.html

    Liked by 3 people

    • Heika says:

      Every single one of them are lying scum, including Ford. She’s the worst of them all. I am sick to death of every single commentator (conservative) pre-empting their analysis with apologies…”I am not saying Ms Ford has not been sexually assaulted, she probably has, but not by…” You know what? Let’s get this clear. even if it happened – and it did not – what she has described as ‘sexual assault’ is not sexual assault. There was no penetration, no skin bared or exposed. The main point is clear. NO CHARGES HAVE BEEN PRESSED EVER… not then, not now, not ever. Case closed. For women to have dignity, we need men to be strong and courageous and to be men, not to fall over at the first sight of a weeping fake whore as Ford is. That stupid cow, with her baby valley girl pouting performance, where all I saw was a rather wretched middle age woman putting on a complete act to ‘save the cause for aborting near full term babies’, and for setting women’s causes back 200 years makes me sick. How dare she, and how dare those repulsive Democrats. I am still battling to contain my anger at this, mostly at Grassley for being so weak in the first place, and how these horrible whores (yes I cannot hold it), have hurt women and real sexual assault victims of both sexes by sewing this lie into the fabric of our culture. I am sorry for my strong language.

      Liked by 11 people

      • Heika- BRILLIAN post and analysis. Thanks.

        Like

      • Nordic Breed says:

        What I want to know is this: why is Grassley not calling for an investigation of Ford, Ramirez, and Swetnik? Their allegations are not credible at all! Every one of us women can see right through the holes in their stories. Only the man is being requested for a criminal investigation. Also, why can’t we have a criminal investigation of every Dem and RINO who is going along with this. A pox on them all and their filthy lawyers.

        Every mother, grandmother, and aunt out there had better be really worried about what can happen to their sons, husbands, fathers, nephews and grandsons after this witch hunt.

        Liked by 2 people

      • George1 says:

        Notice how the ONLY politician in Washington correctly states that this whole thing was a con job. The rest, including Ted Cruz, all say well she was credible.

        disgusting.

        Like

      • Pat Frederick says:

        I agree totally…women get molested more often and more vigorously sometimes on the subway…

        Liked by 1 person

      • Sentient says:

        Republicans think they have to pretend that Ford isn’t a liar – just confused and used by the Dems – because otherwise women voters will think the republicans are insensitive to women. They’re probably right to a degree. The women who know she’s lying wouldn’t mind her being called a liar, but women who are unsure might object to her being “badgered”. So the republicans have to say things that few of us believe. Blame the 19th Amendment.

        Like

      • kathyca says:

        “have hurt women and real sexual assault victims”

        This is what infuriates me, too. What man in his right mind is EVER going to hire a woman over a man for any position. The more the man has to lose, the less likely he will be to hire a woman. Much better to have the company sued for discrimination, than be personally ruined by the new hire. Congrats, moron.

        And on the point of real sexual assault victims I say to Christine Ford ARE YOU EFFING KIDDING ME? I could not give a single, solitary chit about what supposedly happened to you — even IF Kavanaugh did it. Which I don’t believe for a second. Get over yourself, honey, ’cause I know there are millions of real victims who would gladly “suffer” your “traumatic event” 100 times over rather than the ACTUAL very bad things that happened to them. While she’s up there mewling over a normal teenager situation that happened nearly 4 decades ago, there are little children all over the world being actually, physically raped by grown men. Gah. She makes me sick.

        Liked by 6 people

        • steph_gray says:

          100% agree, kathyca.

          We need to make clear that the DemonCrats here are doing real damage to women who are assaulted for real.

          Also doing doing real damage to the employment prospects of all women.

          In fact, doing real damage to women in general whom they profess to defend!

          Everyone at CTH has known this forever – but please hammer it home with all the women you can!

          Liked by 1 person

      • mimbler says:

        I’m tired of our side stipulating that she is credible and that something probably happened too Heika.

        It is counterproductive and it just flat out isn’t true. All the proven deliberate lies she has told, as well as the paucity of detail make here the opposite of credible.
        And we should say so.

        The vast majority of voters pay very little attention to details, and if our side constantly reinforces her credibility, it doesn’t help to mobilize for the mid terms.

        Like

  15. Horrible. They will reduce his lunch money.

    Like

  16. jeans2nd says:

    Looks like Lindsey Graham was punked again. Graham was so proud of Sheldon Whitehouse when Whitehouse came to Graham about this alleged “incident” and they both went to the FBI.
    Typical Democrat Progressive Socialist – never allow yourself to be the only one on whom blame falls.

    There just is no cure for stupid.

    Wonder if Graham knew about the reporter? Why is Graham not included in Grassley’s referral?

    Liked by 2 people

    • thedoc00 says:

      Your first sentence answers your own question. Graham had noting to do with the reporter and I do no fault him for his statement during the hearing.

      Like

      • jeans2nd says:

        We must agree to disagree. You don not know whether Graham had interaction with the reporter any more than I. The point is, why did Graham participate at all?

        Like

  17. Thomas Pernice says:

    Years ago, someone asked actor Harrison Ford what religion he was. His smarmy response was, “I’m a Democrat”.

    To the God-less secular left, the absence of belief in God does not mean they don’t believe in anything. They have simply substituted progressive, libertine politics for traditional God-based religion and morality. The principal “sacrament” of that organized “religion” is abortion. The proof that abortion is the primary and indispensable tenet of their dogma is the statement made by DNC chairman Tom Perez when he said that “every Democrat” should support abortion and that “it is not negotiable”.

    Yep, it sounds awfully like a “dogma of faith”.

    Liked by 1 person

  18. pattyloo says:

    dems were so used to all branches of govt being corrupted/biased to ignore crimes from sex assault to murder & treason (as long as the perp is a dem). so they thought using the FBI investigation as a delay tactic would end up like any of the investigations into the Clintons and other famously infamous dems. (no indictment, just gets dragged out and forgotten).

    they didn’t realize that PDJT actually is in control of those levers now – I believe there are white hats within those agencies helping him. btw – I thought that Sheldon whitehouse was probably the worst of the questioners in the Ford hearings. Yes, Spartacus & Kamila were offputting, but we expect that from them. Maybe because I wasn’t familiar with Whitehouse. I put him up there as obnoxious as Tom Daschel or Dick Durbin.

    Liked by 2 people

  19. swimologist says:

    Reverse the particulars: say it was a Democrat nominee– the Rhode Island accuser would ALREADY be charged and the Republican senator would be censured

    Liked by 2 people

  20. HickTick says:

    Don’t pay any attention to Lindsey Graham , He is in trouble here in SC , his poll numbers are way down . He does something good every now and then to seem conservative but he is pure RINO

    Liked by 2 people

    • Stab, the unstoppable hero says:

      Yep. I was very impressed with his support for Judge Kavanaugh at the hearings & then saw him engage with reporters the other day concerning Flakes demands for FBI investigation. His entire soundbite consisted of the crap politicians spout when they cover for one of their own.
      Does anyone REALLY believe Flake is doing this out concern that Kavanaugh might be a dangerous predator?

      Like

      • Patriot1783 says:

        At first I thought that about Graham but in hindsight he seemed gleeful that Kavanaugh Nomination was finally out of committee with a majority and had something up his sleeve which seems aligned with Grassley, McConnell and Potus behavior as well.

        Like

        • Stab, the unstoppable hero says:

          Patriot, I hope you are right about his sleeve. This morning I saw him on Maria and he was once again the “good” Lindsey. “Going to get to the bottom of these delay tactics with a Senate investigation”.
          We’ll see, I guess. I just hope he can exert some control over his “dear friend & a good guy” Jeff Flake.

          Like

      • Eaglemom says:

        No, FLake is doing this because “its tearing the country apart” (eyes rolling)! And, in his delusional mind this is his maverick moment.

        Like

    • franuche says:

      I just moved to SC, gonna vote for the pro-Trump candidates across the board!

      Liked by 1 person

      • Jenevive says:

        Katie Arrington for me! At least she is new..But in two years
        when Lindsay and Tim come up for reelection
        that is a different story. One good act by Lindsay doesn;t
        erase his not supportive side. I will wait till election is over
        then see which side he is on..

        Liked by 1 person

    • beach lover says:

      I disagree. Check out his interview on Maria B. show today. You may change your mind. I hope Sundance will post it later today. It was very reassuring where Lindsey stands on this.

      Like

  21. Heika says:

    Good, now line the rest of them up for investigation, including firstly FORD (the woman who cried her way through her ‘script’ without once needing to blow her nose… (lying tramp) and Feinstein et al.

    Liked by 1 person

  22. Crewdog 52. says:

    Sheldon Whitehouse is just another in a long line of over-bred, elitist, pompous, entitled New England snobs who have been around for at least 100 years screwing up the political process. For what its worth, I include the Bush family in this group. Must be something in the water…

    Like

  23. Patriot1783 says:

    Graham on Maria will request to Grassley to investigate all the Democratic leaks, media connections and how Ford didn’t know what was going on re the investigators offer to come to her, how her privacy was released, and why Fienstein office recommended a lawyer to a witness involved in a committee investigation.

    Liked by 2 people

  24. Katie Weddington says:

    We now fondly refer to Sheldon as “Farticus.” 😀

    Like

  25. Ms Ford has provided false information also. What about all of her witnesses who state they never witnessed anything. Isn’t that providing false testimony, too? Anyone who believes that baby voice is for real is totally stupid or totally corrupt or totally insane.

    Liked by 1 person

    • not2worryluv says:

      I’d like to ask her students is this “baby voice” the voice she uses when teaching?
      As a professional woman, I’ve never come across any of my colleagues who talk in this manner.
      I also found it amusing that someone with a PHD didn’t understand the meaning of “on your behest” and then had to have it explained three times what the word meant in its context.

      Like

    • thedoc00 says:

      She knows all the psycho babble terms and will play the distressed maiden form of insanity plea. The court case will occur in CA, so what do you think are the chances of anything serious happening to her legally?? Also, if the go after her congressional testimony we are now in a DC or VA court, same comment as CA court.

      Like

  26. Lactantius says:

    Remember Ralphie in Jean Shepherd’s “A Christmas Story”? Remember the narration in the movie? That was the author telling his fable as no one else could tell it. Ralphie did his growing up right before our eyes and we cheered like crazy when he had finally had enough of Scut Farkus and slapped him silly. Jean Shepherd’s narration said “a fuse blew and I went out of my skull.” Ralphie pounded and slapped and windmilled away on Scut Farkas as the air was filled with Ralphie’s non-stop swearing.

    The DemonizingRats finally triggered the Ralphie inside of Judge Kavenaugh and, it would appear, in Lindsey Graham as well.

    It is past time for President Donald J. Trump to announce that he has ordered the FBI to also do the substantiation interviews on Dr. Ford’s claims and testimony. You know, goose and gander.

    Then there is Bob Woodward who gets interviews with comatose people and myriad sources of impeccable character who are unnamed and beyond fact checking. He should take his magic pen and find the leaker of the letter and explain how all the obvious DemonizingRat cabal is actually a grand cover story micromanaged by Jeb Bush, John McCain and Joe McCarthy from a bunker hidden under the Lincoln Memorial. Or whatever.

    Methinks that Chuck Grassley, the 85 year old Iowan farm boy and sheet metal worker has had a belly full of the DemoninzingRats and is ready to stand and fight the DemonizingRat way of steamrolling the process.

    Like

    • Lactantius says:

      As a clarification, Jean Shepherd specialized in looking at the world through the eyes of a pre-teen and being both in awe and in a Mark Twain manner of “confusion.” The DemonizingRats have dropped down to pre-teen levels of mud-slinging and forming bully gangs.

      Think hard on that. The Never-Trumpers are perfectly willing to sit back and let the DemonizingRats rumble. The “tactic” is to lead the useful idiots with torchlight parades and waving pitchforks. This is the age of rent-a-mod nihilism. The collapse of the general order is as good a tactic as any in the Progressive game plan for their dictatorship of enforced utopian ideals.

      Like

  27. Diane Stress says:

    Maybe they can get this idiot Whitehouse with this!!!

    Like

  28. Non=combative. says:

    Sheldon Whitehouse is the same idiot who inferred that any teenage boy who makes a fart joke must be identified as a sexual pervert. The demented democrats are telling parents who teach their teenage sons conservative values who’s same sons might drink a beer are rapists. Sickening pukes, the democrats.

    Like

    • Crewdog 52. says:

      Can you imagine this ass going through military basic training circa 1960s and 70s? His virgin ears would probably explode after a 10 minute rant from his D.I. with not a single cuss word or obscenity repeated. Guaranteed psychological casualty and general discharge after two weeks in basic; instead a US Senator! Holy batsh-t, Batman!

      Like

    • thedoc00 says:

      Interesting comment Whitehouse made. I was a college recruiter coordinator and essentially full time chaperone for three different select girls soccer teams. That included being designated driver for one of the team vans at out of town tournaments. If parents and/or other adults would have sat in that van, heard the language and bodily sounds they would be witness to parents in various stages of cardiac arrest.

      Liked by 1 person

  29. Concerned Virginian says:

    This is part of the explanation behind that comment from POTUS at the West Virginia rally last night when he said that there were a lot a “bad things” happening to the Democrats “tonight”. I feel that is much more coming.

    Like

  30. VoteAllIncumbantsOut says:

    Reposting again…

    I hope everyone is familiar with the movie “The Sting” because it’s being remade into a live version starring POTUS, Grassley, McConnell, Flake, Graham and the FBI.

    Music will be performed by the “2 hour rule”, “Unanimous 51” and “The Hatch Letter”

    New York Times calls it “A shock to the core”
    Rotten Tomatoes gives it “2 thumbs up, a MUST see!”
    The Washington Post says “You’ll be sitting on the edge of your seat the whole time”

    “The Sting”. 2018

    New comment…

    I. Can’t. Spoil. The. Movie.

    Think of the sequence of events that occurred, exactly the way the music is performed. What did POTUS say during last weeks rally?
    “They’re gone, they’re gone, they’re gone”

    Like Sundance said to us all…
    We don’t need Q, discern for ourselves!

    Like

  31. Anonymous says:

    As ol’ Grump Cat said:

    Like

  32. Sentient says:

    So we have to sit here waiting to find out whether this new “investigation” will alleviate the concerns of the three waivering women of the senate GOP caucus. Sad.

    Like

    • thedoc00 says:

      By three wavering women, I assume Flake is one of the three along with Collins and Murkowski. The women mentioned are democrats in tough situations.

      Like

  33. Hopper Creek says:

    Basley Ford didn t know if she s paying her Lieyers ! , but has a go fund me page.
    Her Lieyers said to Senate Judiciary they re working pro bono…now, if they get any go fund me money, wouldn t that be a crime of some kind ? Just wondering

    Like

    • VoteAllIncumbantsOut says:

      No, pro bono does not mean you cannot except a donation.

      Why does the Porn Lawyer keep saying “My witness has a sworn statement”?
      Because you can legally lie to your lawyer and until it goes to a court of law its only a talking point but, when it’s before a judge then it becomes perjury.

      Like

      • VoteAllIncumbantsOut says:

        Secondly…
        Congress is not a court of law so if you lie to them, yes there can be penalties but they cannot put you behind bars, that is up to a case filed in the courts.

        Third…
        Roe v. Wade cannot be overturned unless a case is brought before the SC which is settled law!

        We are all just ‘Useful Idiots’, ‘Pawns’ in a chess game and until we decide to wise up, study law, we will continue this path.

        Like

        • VoteAllIncumbantsOut says:

          You can lie all day long to your lawyer which leaves 3 options,
          1. If he/she knows your lying, he won’t take the case.
          2. If he/she knows your lying, represents you, he/she is disbarred when caught!
          3. Knows your lying, sues you. Why take the chance and waist money and resources?

          The top 2 are most apparent here.

          Like

          • VoteAllIncumbantsOut says:

            Now…
            Why was Bromwich asked to resign his partnership from the law firm?

            Like

            • thedoc00 says:

              His law firm has cases before the Federal Court System. They need to break any conflict of interest concerns. That is pretty straight forward. He will be “rehired” once this is over.

              Bromwich is not going to loose any money, as multi-million dollar funds had been established long ago to cover costs by very rich US elites who are the ones pulling the strings. His fees are meter money to these elites. People need to adjust their aim, Soros is a rotten scoundrel and banker for this effort but he is NOT the one pulling the strings.

              Like

              • VoteAllIncumbantsOut says:

                I certainly did not say he wouldn’t be rehired, but the firm does not need a blemish on their record, they know this is a tall tale… if they didn’t, then the firm under Bromwich would be represented as a whole.

                Think about employee/employer and reputation.

                Like

                • VoteAllIncumbantsOut says:

                  Plus…
                  This is not your ordinary case, its national.

                  Like

                • thedoc00 says:

                  For some reason, I don’t think blemishes are a worry to this law firm, also the likelihood of bad PR from this case is nearly zero since all the networks are all-in vs Judge Kavanaugh and Republicans.

                  Like

  34. Pokey says:

    We haven’t seen anything yet. The leftists have to do anything to keep Kavenaugh out of the SC because they have spent my entire lifetime getting whatever they want from the SC when they can’t jam it down our throats by Constitutional means. And that has been most of what they have accomplished and I am pretty old. They were so close to complete control of our society and its government that they cannot afford to lose without a massive exposure of who they really are and what they really want. The war is on, and it has to be fought if the Constitution is to survive at all. I believe it is too late to stop them, but I pray that I am wrong.

    Like

  35. teeheeman says:

    I really hadn’t listened much to Whitehoue until these hearings. What a DESPICABLE HUMAN BEING. I pray this goes somewhere.

    Like

  36. evergreen says:

    The FBI is the fallback sort-it-out method chosen by Flake and Dems. They just threw their professed faith into the legitimacy of the FBI–it is now the Arbiter. Great. Use that against them.

    I’d recommend that, once B.K. is confirmed, Grassley refer Ford and Feinstein for criminal prosecution for perpetrating a fraud, just like this referral. Let the FBI sort it out. After all, it’s only proper gathering of facts on the ground. Just as Flake, et al, profess that investigative review of B.K. is no harm to B.K., so the process works on the accuser as well.

    Let them both face perjury jeopardy after the fact as they answer progressively more nuanced, probing questions and their testimonies are juxtaposed for conflicts. These people are so ripe for prosecution, it ain’t funny. If they are not, the Senate guarantees the next appointment will be an even bigger, more complicated mess. That can only be the case, because this resistance movement will only get more sophisticated and lay down better foundational support for future accusations of known supreme court candidates. I guarantee the list published by Trump has a 6-figure working budget funding their opposition research.

    Liked by 1 person

  37. ladypenquin says:

    A few thoughts about Christine Ford’s California house, and her stated desire to add another “front door” or was it just another door to she could escape quicker – due to her trauma and fears…

    1) Most houses have a front door AND a back door. In fact, if a bad guy comes in the front, you go out the back!

    2) Garages and carports often have a door to the main house – kitchen or laundry room. So there’s another door. My house has 3 doors – back and front and a garage door access via the laundry room. In fact, the garage has a big, big door to fit a car in – 🙂 and another door out to the backyard.

    3) Many houses have sliding glass doors to their backyard or patio. Does Ms Ford’s have them?

    Finally, there are always windows of course, for escape.

    Her remodel plans and permit started in 2008 – this isn’t about facts, but trying to fit falsehoods into supporting a narrative of deceit.

    Liked by 2 people

    • ladypenquin says:

      Oh, and who would want a second front door for “escape” – the bad guy is right there to stop you getting access to another front door.

      The entire thing is a lie, but worse, it’s insane that we have to fight to prove she’s lying when they keep changing the story.

      I hope that they’re able to prove the collusion between influential Dems, the Senate, and Ms Ford herself to enter into a false narrative in order to destroy Judge Kavanaugh. no different than what they’ve been doing with the Russiangate story – to destroy Donald Trump.

      Manufacturing evidence is a felony. It’s also why they won’t file a police report, even if the Statute of Limitations has run out. The report would still stand, just cannot be prosecuted.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Monticello says:

      It was a lie. She rents a room to “Google interns”.

      Liked by 1 person

    • dianeax says:

      Thank you – I thought I was the only one who didn’t understand what she was talking about!

      Liked by 1 person

  38. thesavvyinvester says:

    At a minimum I hope this leads to at least a censure for Comrade Sheldon and Lindsey Graham was hinting full investigation into Chi-Di-Fi and her Fakata Carnival crew. I’d welcome that censure more than anything. I’d wait until Jan 21st 2019, when the R’s in the Senate are somewhere between 60 and 65. Yes I am an optimist and I see things others don’t. We run the table people, and the meltdown by the other side will be epic.

    Liked by 2 people

    • dianeax says:

      I agree we run the table. And yes, the meltdown will be epic. That is clearly visible in the high anxiety level of the Dems.

      Liked by 1 person

    • The Boss says:

      If there are that many R’s, I’d try first for expulsion.

      Like

    • Your Tour Guide says:

      You left someone out in the censure. Maxine Waters.
      She should be brought up on charges for being behind
      the Doxxing of the Republicans. Way past time to
      kneecap this bitch.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Lester Smith says:

        Waters should be censured for impersonating a human. Sheldon Ralph farthouse is quite the tool. He and Spartacus are stars of a new TV show. Spartacus and farthouse. The show is about two dirt bag low life senator’s and their cast of bungling democrat Comrades with special guest star Jeff Flake. This show is a laugh a minute with many plot twists and unexpected endings.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Jenevive says:

        Speaking of Maxie did any see Air Fleischer
        response to her letter where she vhemently denied
        the leaks. He basically mocked her with well getting angry
        shows she is not fit to be a congresswoman it is not appropriate
        to get upset when you are accused of something. you must just talk
        nice and not get upset.

        I was quite surprised to see that response from Ari.

        Liked by 2 people

  39. dianeax says:

    Please that the criminal investigation include Senator Whitehouse, for too many reasons to enumerate but mostly what he did to Judge Kavanaugh last week.

    Liked by 1 person

  40. Lotuslander says:

    Is there any way to get Chairman Grassley to open an investigation into Dr. Ford? There is so much wrong with her story but people are accepting everything she said as absolute truth.

    Liked by 1 person

  41. Mike diamond says:

    Sheld on should be investigated!!!!

    Liked by 1 person

  42. Spurwing Plover says:

    Lets have Crinimal Investigation of Eric Holder lets see what his past holds he is hiding something from us

    Liked by 1 person

  43. CNN_sucks says:

    Mr. Catalan is a freaking IDIOT. This is a battle of high powered and well connected people. The reason why PDJT is hated because he is an outsider. The wheeling and dealing is the monopoly of the well connected. Mr. Catalan, a peon, insert himself and lied about it. You don’t mix yourself with the well connected when you are a NOBODY. Yes, Mr. Catalan, you are going to prison for lying and after that you are free to leave the country.

    Liked by 1 person

  44. shipley130 says:

    The left thought that the Republicans would fold and Brett Kavanaugh would simply withdraw from his nomination after the Blasey-Ford allegations. The pukes had to scramble to figure out more strategies after neither the Republicans nor Brett Kavanaugh folded.

    Liked by 1 person

  45. USA Citizen says:

    Alan Dershowitz, a American Lawyer said something on Fox News that you never hear. He said
    that these women that are lying to ruin Judge Kavanaugh should be prosecuted and sent to prison.
    They mustn’t get away with ruining men’s lives. Wake Up, people! Women are big liars and they
    think they should get away with it. Things will change after this horrible accusation against Judge Brett Kavanaugh. I’m a woman myself but these women have to be punished when they lie and
    enjoy ruining a man’s life.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s