President Trump Grants Full Pardon for Dwight Hammond (76) and Steven Hammond (49) – Oregon Ranchers…

The full story behind the Hammond family persecution is Available Here.  Back in 2016 in an effort to draw attention to the malicious prosecution of the Hammonds’, three brothers from the Cliven Bundy family and approximately 100/150 armed militia (former U.S. service) took control over the Malheur Wildlife Refuge Headquarters  and a standoff took place.  Today President Trump grants a pardon for Dwight and Steven Hammond.

Hammond family.

July 10, 2018 – Statement from the Press Secretary Regarding Executive Clemency for Dwight and Steven Hammond:

Today, President Donald J. Trump signed Executive Grants of Clemency (Full Pardons) for Dwight Lincoln Hammond, Jr., and his son, Steven Hammond. The Hammonds are multi-generation cattle ranchers in Oregon imprisoned in connection with a fire that leaked onto a small portion of neighboring public grazing land. The evidence at trial regarding the Hammonds’ responsibility for the fire was conflicting, and the jury acquitted them on most of the charges.

At the Hammond’s original sentencing, the judge noted that they are respected in the community and that imposing the mandatory minimum, 5-year prison sentence would shock the conscience and be grossly disproportionate to the severity of their conduct. As a result, the judge imposed significantly lesser sentences. The previous administration, however, filed an overzealous appeal that resulted in the Hammond’s being sentenced to five years in prison. This was unjust.

Dwight Hammond is now 76 years old and has served approximately three years in prison. Steven Hammond is 49 and has served approximately four years in prison. They have also paid $400,000 to the United States to settle a related civil suit. The Hammond’s are devoted family men, respected contributors to their local community, and have widespread support from their neighbors, local law enforcement, and farmers and ranchers across the West. Justice is overdue for Dwight and Steven Hammond, both of whom are entirely deserving of these Grants of Executive Clemency.  (White House Link)

Here’s the full BACKSTORY as we originally researched, outlined and shared in 2016:

HISTORY: (aa) The Harney Basin (where the Hammond ranch is established) was settled in the 1870’s. The valley was settled by multiple ranchers and was known to have run over 300,000 head of cattle. These ranchers developed a state of the art irrigated system to water the meadows, and it soon became a favorite stopping place for migrating birds on their annual trek north.

(ab) In 1908 President Theodor Roosevelt, in a political scheme, create an “Indian reservation” around the Malheur, Mud & Harney Lakes and declared it “as a preserve and breeding ground for native birds”. Later this “Indian reservation” (without Indians) became the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge.

(a) In 1964 the Hammonds’ purchased their ranch in the Harney Basin. The purchase included approximately 6000 acres of private property, 4 grazing rights on public land, a small ranch house and 3 water rights. The ranch is around 53 miles South of Burns, Oregon.

(a1) By the 1970’s nearly all the ranches adjacent to the Blitzen Valley were purchased by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and added to the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. The refuge covers over 187,000 acres, stretches over 45 miles long and 37 miles wide. The expansion of the refuge grew and surrounds to the Hammond’s ranch. Approached many times by the FWS, the Hammonds refused to sell. Other ranchers also choose not to sell.

(a2) During the 1970’s the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), in conjunction with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), took a different approach to get the ranchers to sell. Ranchers were told: “grazing was detrimental to wildlife and must be reduced”; 32 out of 53 permits were revoked and many ranchers were forced to leave. Grazing fees were raised significantly for those who were allowed to remain. Refuge personnel took over the irrigation system claiming it as their own.

(a3) By 1980 a conflict was well on its way over water allocations on the adjacent privately owned Silvies Plain. The FWS wanted to acquire the ranch lands on the Silvies Plain to add to their already vast holdings. Refuge personnel intentionally diverted the water bypassing the vast meadow lands, directing the water into the rising Malheur Lakes. Within a few short years the surface area of the lakes doubled. Thirty-one ranches on the Silvies plains were flooded. Homes, corrals, barns and graze-land were washed a way and destroyed. The ranchers who once fought to keep the FWS from taking their land, now broke and destroyed, begged the FWS to acquire their useless ranches. In 1989 the waters began to recede; now the once thriving privately owned Silvies plains are a proud part of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge claimed by the FWS.

(a4) By the 1990’s the Hammonds were one of the very few ranchers who still owned private property adjacent to the refuge. Susie Hammond in an effort to make sense of what was going on began compiling facts about the refuge. In a hidden public record she found a study done by the FWS in 1975. The study showed the “no use” policies of the FWS on the refuge were causing the wildlife to leave the refuge and move to private property. The study showed the private property adjacent to the Malheur Wildlife Refuge produced four times more ducks and geese than the refuge.  The study also showed the migrating birds were 13 times more likely to land on private property than on the refuge. When Susie brought this to the attention of the FWS and refuge personnel, her and her family became the subjects of a long train of abuses and corruptions.

(b) In the early 1990’s the Hammonds filed on a livestock water source and obtained a deed for the water right from the State of Oregon. When the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) found out the Hammonds obtained new water rights near the Malhuer Wildlife Refuge, they were agitated and became belligerent and vindictive toward the Hammonds. The US Fish and Wildlife Service challenged the Hammonds right to the water in an Oregon State Circuit Court. The court found the Hammonds legally obtained rights to the water in accordance to State law and therefore the use of the water belongs to the Hammonds.*

(c) In August 1994 the BLM & FWS illegally began building a fence around the Hammonds water source. Owning the water rights, and knowing that their cattle relied on that water source daily, the Hammonds tried to stop the building of the fence. The BLM & FWS called the Harney County Sheriff department and had Dwight Hammond (Father) arrested and charged with “disturbing and interfering with” federal officials or federal contractors (two counts, each a felony).  Dwight spent one night in the Deschutes County Jail in Bend, and a second night behind bars in Portland. He was then hauled before a federal magistrate and released without bail. A hearing on the charges was postponed and the federal judge never set another date.

(d) The FWS also began restricting access to upper pieces of the Hammond’s private property. In order to get to the upper part of the Hammond’s ranch they had to go on a road that went through the Malhuer Wildlife Refuge. The FWS began barricading the road and threatening the Hammonds if they drove through it. The Hammonds removed the barricades and gates and continued to use their right of access. The road was proven later to be owned by the County of Harney. This further enraged the BLM & FWS.

(e) Shortly after the road & water disputes, the BLM & FWS arbitrarily revoked the Hammond’s upper grazing permit without any given cause, court proceeding or court ruling. As a traditional “fence out state” Oregon requires no obligation on the part of an owner to keep his or her livestock within a fence or to maintain control over the movement of the livestock. The Hammonds still intended to use their private property for grazing. However, they were informed a federal judge ruled, in a federal court, the federal government did not have to observe the Oregon fence out law. “Those laws are for the people, not for them”.

(f) The Hammonds were forced to either build and maintain miles of fences or be restricted from the use of their private property. Cutting their ranch in almost half, they could not afford to fence the land, so the cattle were removed.

(g) The Hammonds experienced many years of financial hardship due to the ranch being diminished. The Hammonds had to sell their ranch and home in order to purchase another property that had enough grass to feed their cattle. This property included two grazing rights on public land. Those were also arbitrarily revoked later.

(h) The owner of the Hammond’s original ranch passed away from a heart attack and the Hammonds made a trade for the ranch back.

(i) In the early fall of 2001, Steven Hammond (Son) called the fire department, informing them that he was going to be performing a routine prescribed burn on their ranch. Later that day he started a prescribed fire on their private property. The fire went onto public land and burned 127 acres of grass. The Hammonds put the fire out themselves. There was no communication about the burn from the federal government to the Hammonds at that time. Prescribed fires are a common method that Native Americans and ranchers have used in the area to increase the health & productivity of the land for many centuries.

(j) In 2006 a massive lightning storm started multiple fires that joined together inflaming the countryside. To prevent the fire from destroying their winter range and possibly their home, Steven Hammond (Son) started a backfire on their private property. The backfire was successful in putting out the lightning fires that had covered thousands of acres within a short period of time. The backfire saved much of the range and vegetation needed to feed the cattle through the winter. Steven’s mother, Susan Hammond said: “The backfire worked perfectly, it put out the fire, saved the range and possibly our home”.

(j1) The next day federal agents went to the Harney County Sheriff’s office and filled a police report making accusation against Dwight and Steven Hammond for starting the backfire. A few days after the backfire a Range-Con from the Burns District BLM office asked Steven if he would meet him in town (Frenchglen) for coffee. Steven accepted. When leaving he was arrested by the Harney County Sheriff Dave Glerup and BLM Ranger Orr. Sheriff Glerup then ordered him to go to the ranch and bring back his father. Both Dwight and Steven were booked and on multiple Oregon State charges. The Harney County District Attorney reviewed the accusation, evidence and charges, and determined the accusations against Dwight & Steven Hammond did not warrant prosecution and dropped all the charges.

(k) In 2011, 5 years after the police report was taken, the U.S. Attorney Office accused Dwight and Steven Hammond of completely different charges; they accused them of being “Terrorists” under the Federal Anti terrorism Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. This act carries a minimum sentence of five years in prison and a maximum sentence of death. Dwight & Steven’s mug shots were all over the news the next week posing them as “Arsonists”. Susan Hammond (Wife & Mother) said: “I would walk down the street or go in a store, people I had known for years would take extreme measures to avoid me”.

(l) Shortly after the sentencing, Capital Press ran a story about the Hammonds. A person who identified as Greg Allum posted three comments on the article, calling the ranchers “clowns” who endangered firefighters and other people in the area while burning valuable range land. Greg Allum, a retired BLM heavy equipment operator, soon called Capital Press to complain he had not made those comments and requested they be taken down from the website. Capital Press removed the comments. A search of the Internet Protocol address associated with the comments revealed the origin as the BLM’s office in Denver, Colorado. Allum said, he is friends with the Hammonds and he was alerted to the comments by neighbors who knew he wouldn’t have written them. “I feel bad for them. They lost a lot and they’re going to lose more,” Allum said of the ranchers. “They’re not terrorists”. “There’s this hatred in the BLM for them, and I don’t get it,” the retired BLM employee said. Jody Weil, deputy state director for communications at BLM’s Oregon office, indicated to reporters that if one of their agents falsified the comments, they would keep it private and not inform the public.

(m) In September 2006, Dwight & Susan Hammond’s home was raided. The agents informed the Hammonds they were looking for evidence that would connect them to the fires. The Hammonds later found out a boot print and a tire tracks were found near one of the many fires. No matching boots or tires were found in the Hammonds home or on their property. Susan Hammond (Wife) later said; ” I have never felt so violated in my life. We are ranchers not criminals”. Steven Hammond openly maintains his testimony that he started the backfire to save the winter grass from being destroyed and the backfire ended up working so well it put out the fire altogether.

(n) During the trial proceedings, Federal Court Judge Michael Hogan did not allow time for certain testimonies and evidence into the trail which would exonerate the Hammonds. Federal prosecuting attorney, Frank Papagni, was given full access for six days. He had ample time to use any evidence or testimony that strengthened the demonization of the Hammonds. The Hammonds attorney was only allowed 1 day. Many of the facts about the fires, land and why the Hammonds acted the way they did was not allowed into the proceedings and was not heard by the jury. Example: Judge Hogan did not allow time for the jury to hear or review certified scientific findings the fires improved the health and productivity of the land. Or, that the Hammonds had been subject to vindictive behavior by multiple federal agencies for years.

(o) Federal attorneys, Frank Papagni, hunted down a witness who was not mentally capable to be credible.  Dusty Hammond (grandson and nephew) testified that Steven told him to start a fire. He was 13-years-old at the time, and 24-years-old when he testified (11 years later). At 24 Dusty had been suffering with mental problems for many years. He had estranged his family including his mother. Judge Hogan noted that Dusty’s memories as a 13-year-old boy were not clear or credible.  However, Judge Hogan allowed the prosecution to continually use Dusty’s testimony. When speaking to the Hammonds about this testimony, they understood Dusty was manipulated and expressed nothing but love for their troubled grandson.

(p) Judge Michael Hogan & Frank Papagni tampered with the jury many times throughout the proceedings, including during the selection process. Hogan & Papagni only allowed people on the jury who did not understand the customs and culture of the ranchers or how land is used and cared for in the Diamond Valley. All of the jurors had to drive back and forth to Pendleton every day. Some drove more than two hours each way. By day 8 they were exhausted and expressed desires to be home.

On the final day, Judge Hogan kept pushing them to make a verdict. [Several times during deliberation, Judge Hogan pushed them to make a decision.]  Judge Hogan also would not allow the jury to hear what punishment could be imposed upon an individual convicted as a terrorist under the 1996 act. The jury, not understanding the customs and cultures of the area and influenced by the prosecutors for six straight days, very exhausted, pushed for a verdict by the judge, unaware of the ramification of convicting someone as a terrorist, gave a verdict and went home.

(q) June 22, 2012, Dwight and Steven were found guilty of starting both the 2001 and the 2006 fires by the jury. However, the federal courts convicted them both as “Terrorists” under the 1996 Anti terrorism Act. Judge Hogan sentenced Dwight (Father) to 3 months in prison and Steven (son) to 12 months in federal prison. Both were also stipulated to pay $400,000 to the BLM. Judge Hogan overruling the minimum terrorist sentence, commented if the full five years were required it would be a violation of the 8th amendment (cruel and unusual punishment). The day of the sentencing Judge Hogan retired as a federal judge. In his honor the staff served chocolate cake in the courtroom.

(r) On January 4, 2013, Dwight and Steven reported to prison. They fulfilled their sentences, (Dwight 3 months, Steven 12 months). Dwight was released in March 2013 and Steven, January 2014.

(s) Sometime in June 2014, Rhonda Karges, Field Manager for the BLM, and her husband Chad Karges, Refuge Manager for the Malheur Wildlife Refuge (which surrounds the Hammond ranch), along with attorney Frank Papagni exemplified further vindictive behavior by filing an appeal with the 9th District Federal Court seeking Dwight’s and Steven’s return to federal prison for the entire 5 years.*

(t) In October 2015, the 9th District Court “re-sentenced” Dwight and Steven, requiring them to return to prison for several more years. Steven (46) has a wife and 3 children. Dwight (74) will leave Susan (74) to be alone after 55 years of marriage. If he survives, he will be 79 when he is released.

(u) During the court preceding the Hammonds were forced to grant the BLM first right of refusal; if the Hammonds ever sold their ranch they would have to sell it to the BLM.

(v) Dwight and Steven are ordered to report to federal prison again on January 4th, 2016 to begin their re-sentencing. Both their wives will have to manage the ranch for several years without them.


Here are some interesting links about US Attorney Amanda Marshall who made the recommendation to challenge the Hammonds’ original sentences. She resigned in May 2015 for “health reasons” amid a scandal – she is accused of stalking a subordinate, federal prosecutor Scott Kerin. She was an Obama appointee who had no experience as a federal prosecutor when she took the job (see below*).

1) About Amanda Marshall, from the Oregonian’s list of “players” in the Hammond family case.

“Amanda Marshall: Former U.S. Attorney for Oregon. Marshall recommended that the federal government challenge the Hammonds’ original prison sentences. By law, the convictions come with mandatory five-year sentences, but U.S. District Judge Michael Hogan in 2012 balked at the punishment and instead sentenced Dwight Hammond to three months and Steven Hammond to one year. Marshall called Hogan’s punishments “unlawful.” The solicitor general authorized a rare appeal of an Oregon judge’s order. The appeals court sided with the prosecution, and the Hammonds returned to federal court last year to face a second sentencing. At that hearing, U.S. Chief District Judge Ann Aiken ordered the pair to finish five-year terms.”

Oregon’s top federal prosecutor traveled from commune to the corner office

2) The Scandal:

Oregon U.S. Attorney Amanda Marshall resigns amid internal review, cites health issues

Federal Prosecutor Allegedly Stalked By U.S. Attorney Amanda Marshall Was Under Armed Protection – Scott Kerin reportedly had a contract taken out on his life by a Mexican drug cartel.

U.S. Justice Department looking into U.S. Attorney Amanda Marshall’s relationship with employee:

“This is a crucial time in the U.S. Attorney’s office in Oregon, which investigates and prosecutes federal crimes. The office is leading a sweeping influence-peddling investigation of former Gov. John Kitzhaber and his companion, Cylvia Hayes.

Marshall was the surprise choice to replace interim U.S. Attorney Dwight Holton in 2010. She had no experience as a federal prosecutor.* Rather, she was plucked from a child advocacy legal job inside the Oregon Department of Justice. Before that, she served as a deputy district attorney in Coos County.

Kerin is married to a fellow-federal prosecutor in the Portland office. Marshall is married to Ladd Wiles, who last May was elected Circuit Court judge in Yamhill County.”

NOTE: In the above story, Marshall’s attorney, Charese Rohny, misleads the Oregonian by saying that the victim, Scott Kerin, was the subject of an OIG investigation, which was untrue, as it was Ms. Marshall who OIG was investigating.

(More on This Issue HERE)

Within the larger story, and following a similar storyline, in January of 2018 the federal prosecutors in the Bundy prosecution were found to have engaged in gross prosecutorial misconduct and the case against the Bundy’s was thrown out of court.

In a stunning rebuke to federal prosecutors a federal court judge has thrown out the case against Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy “with prejudice”.  In order for a federal judge to completely dismiss a case of this significance indicates the court has found serious and compelling evidence of “gross misconduct” on the part of the prosecuting team.

LAS VEGAS — Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy, his two sons and a militia member will not face a retrial on charges that they led an armed rebellion against federal agents in 2014.

A federal judge on Monday said the federal prosecutors’ conduct was “outrageous” and “violated due process rights” of the defendants.

U.S. District Court Judge Gloria Navarro dismissed the charges against the four men “with prejudice,” meaning they cannot face trial again. She said a new trial would not be sufficient to address the problems in the case and would provide the prosecution with an unfair advantage going forward.

As the courtroom doors opened after Navarro’s ruling, a huge cheer went up from the crowd of spectators gathered outside.

Navarro’s decision comes less than a month after she declared a mistrial in case and found federal prosecutors willfully withheld critical and “potentially exculpatory” evidence from the defense.

Cliven Bundy, his sons Ammon and Ryan Bundy, and militia member Ryan Payne were all in court. Cliven Bundy had remained in jail until the hearing; the judge ordered his immediate release.

Navarro on Dec. 20 cited six pieces of evidence the Nevada U.S. Attorney’s Office failed to disclose that was favorable to the defense and could have changed the outcome of the trial.

The evidence included:

  • Records about surveillance at the Bundy ranch;
  • Maps about government surveillance;
  • Records about the presence of government snipers;
  • FBI logs about activity at the ranch in the days leading up to standoff;
  • Law-enforcement assessments dating to 2012 that found the Bundys posed no threat;
  • Internal affairs reports about misconduct by Bureau of Land Management agents.

“Failure to turn over such evidence violates due process,” Navarro said last month. “A fair trial at this point is impossible.”  (read more)

This entry was posted in 1st Amendment, 2nd Amendment, 3rd Amendment, 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Election 2018, Environmentalism, media bias, President Trump, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

276 Responses to President Trump Grants Full Pardon for Dwight Hammond (76) and Steven Hammond (49) – Oregon Ranchers…

  1. citizen54 says:

    The common denominator in these two cases is an out of control BLM under Barry’s watch. I think the Trump needs to revoke the BLM’s federal law enforcement authorization.

    Liked by 25 people

  2. Spindlitis says:

    No, the same sort of thing happened to us, caused by WA state DNR. They are every bit as vindictive and the courts bend over backwards to do what they want. You can’t imagine it, until you have to deal with it. We just want to sell out and get out of this state. Our government is supposed to protect you from abuse, not be responsible for it. We

    Liked by 9 people

  3. goldensfan says:

    More overwhelming evidence that the Ninth (9th) Circus needs to have most of its judges impeached and removed from service, that the 9th Circus needs to be divided into at least three more circuits (9th, 10th, 11th, 12th) and that long-term, expensive investigations need to be conducted on each judge to determine if any malfeasance has occurred during their service. Long Term & Expensive. I have not heard of any other FWS area being submitted to this kind of abuse and corruption but the DoJ needs to have its reliable attorneys looking into this or the general population WILL take a stand. EPA, DoEd, DoEn, IRS, FIB, it’s all too much unaccountable bureaucracy running amok.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Cooper45 says:

      “the DoJ needs to have its reliable attorneys looking into this..”

      A fair and impartial review regarding the politicization of the judiciary and how politics has affected their decisions etc. is a reasonable suggestion but given the recent disclosures and evidence about the political corruption within the FBI and DOJ and the anti Trump sentiments likely still prevailing in the DOJ, it would be difficult to know for sure who are the “reliable attorneys.”

      Besides, the highest priority of the DOJ led by Rosenstien appears to be supporting the Mueller investigation which is still vigorously hounding Trump associates and ignoring any wrongdoing by the Dems. He is not setting an optimistic example for your suggestion.

      Liked by 1 person

    • All American Snowflake says:

      In Seattle they enforce the EPA’s unrealistic guidelines and attempt to promote even more such; yet they fail to stop the unlawfully use of pot in public places; the smell of pot is allowed to permeate the green belts and parks.


  4. CopperTop says:

    This pardon by DJT fascinates me. My one reservation on voting for him was his ‘Glee’ over Kelo v. New London decision which the Supreme Court handed governments enormous power to ‘take property’ and order condemned status in favor of eminent domain and a justified public use.

    As a real estate developer he was thrilled. I was curious how he would behave in other acts of land takings by our government.

    This pardon was not about land taking by the BLM certainly acted like they were doing all the could to take the land and in fact go that right of first refusal in the taking…

    I’ll score myself pleased that as POTUS he is acting for traditions of America and the spirit of who built it, cultivated and owned it to produce the bounty we share within it.

    Kelo is abhorred by Gorsuch so it was indeed interesting when he was named the first SCOTUS pick under 45

    Liked by 2 people

  5. Howzie says:

    Looks like we got us a President.

    Liked by 12 people

  6. Jackson says:

    This is fantastic. Thank you President Trump!
    There are a few loose ends that need to be cleaned up, in my opinion.

    * Former U.S. Attorney Amanda Marshall was not only investigated and forced to resign, as a result of her lies to the investigators her Oregon law license was suspended for three months and then she was given two years probation and forced to undergo psychological counseling. Link:

    This alone might have been reason enough to pardon them, the U.S. Attorney leading this prosecution was fired at the conclusion, and lost her law license! There is even more back story to this. Amanda Marshall was previously a lead prosecutor for the State of Oregon Child Protective Services.

    I remember reading that she had tangled with the Hammonds over a family issue in that role, so it seems her promotion to U.S. Attorney may have been specifically to “get the Hammonds”.

    As the Hammonds have the last in-holding in the Malher you know the damned Feds wanted them out, it’s standard operating procedure.

    * Rhonda Karges, Field Manager for the BLM, and her husband Chad Karges, Refuge Manager for the Malheur Wildlife Refuge need to be fired. Vindictive pricks.

    * The judge in the case, Ann Aiken, is also a vindictive shrew, but her punishment will be more difficult to arrange. But we should still work to make it happen. . Impeachment is hard to do, but not impossible. We need to make it more common. Aiken’s major qualification for her Judgeship was her time as a Dem fundraiser, her work on the Kulingowski for Gov.campaign and her husband’s job as the chair of the Oregon Dem party. She was appointed by Bill Clinton, naturally.

    Liked by 6 people

    • CNN_sucks says:



    • Republicanvet91 says:

      Unfortunately, the biggest challenge any sane American faces at holding these people accountable is how those targeted by these criminals are portrayed by the media.

      The Bundy’s and the Hammonds and many others unheard from have been portrayed as a bunch of right wing, anti-government crazes who don’t want to pay grazing fees. They are just rich cattle ranchers looking for welfare who want to run their cattle anywhere and ruin wildlife areas.

      Others on the left pick up this line of thinking without ever digging out the facts of how landowners have been treated by these thugs, and the freedom we have lost.

      There are also a frightening number of enviro-fanatics who believe vast areas should be blocked off to public access of any kind other than hiking. Both are more than happy to see people like the Bundy’s and Hammonds crushed under the government boot.

      Liked by 5 people

    • lollabells says:

      I agree with you WHOLE heartily about Amanda Marshall, she has a horrible record. And when I was looking into this I came across another one of her victims – 29 year Cody Seth Crawford, who is autistic & bipolar.
      Former U.S. Attorney Amanda Marshall went ahead with prosecuting Crawford when a Corvallis mosque which was across the street form Crawford’s home was set on fire, this happened in 2010 & he was sentenced in federal court to five years of probation for a hate crime. The fire at the center occurred about 2 a.m. Nov. 28, 2010, within hours of news reports that the FBI had foiled a plot to set off a bomb at Portland’s Christmas tree lighting ceremony & had arrested now-convicted terrorist Mohamed Mohamud – who attended this Mosque. They used posts on his Facebook & although he had reported his flashlight lost it was found at the scene (WHICH WAS ACROSS THE STREET) convicted him. Now I know this sounds bad at first glance, but when I started looking into it, I was floored. Cody’s labs came back clean, no accelerate was found on his hands, and a 2nd DNA was found on the flashlight found at the scene. Also there was someone who “set themselves on fire that night” anyways its all there. But they went through & prosecuting him, Cody was sent to OSH Hospital – I think he is still there in a plea agreement, he couldn’t afford a good attorney to fight it. But The Judge in the case was Ann Aiken, I agree she should have done more, AND I HATE WHAT HAPPENED to the Hammond’s, believe me.. I live in Rural WA State I know ALL about burning & all of this made me sick. SICK.. The judges out here are SICK. But anyways Here is the story on Cody, there were MANY not happy with Her accepting his plea arrangement, but Cody (he comments A LOT – in fact that is how I came across his info & started looking into it) says she was compassionate.

      Incident report for man set on fire

      He made a video about her too! keep in mind he is severely autistic!
      This is his Google page, more info.

      These are bad people – these man has been locked up in a mental hospital for something he did not do, The case against the Hammond’s well we all know how sick & twisted that was. Oregon & WA & CA are full of judges liked this! it will CONTINUE to be like this until these Judges, prosecutors are REMOVED. This is 100% abuse of power.


  7. Kristin says:

    Infuriating. Thank you Sundance for giving us the story again. Thank you President Trump!!

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Howzie says:

    President Trump is herding all the Letist Extremeists in to the Beurocrat Canal. Forced to back it. A loser from the git go. Amazing.


  9. Fools Gold says:

    If you think local, state and federal elections for conservatives don’t mean anything re-read this over and over and over. Something a liberal would fathom or consume.

    I know I’m speaking to conservative choir here. I guess I’m just expressing some of that cold anger SD has meantioned a few times I reckon but f you don’t think it can happens in your county, town, city, or state just look at who is controlling them via their campaign contributors.

    Liked by 6 people

    • Parfie says:

      Dwight and Steven Hammond went back to prison, after they had served the 1 year, the first Judge gave them. Then Amanda Marshall (who was a Social Worker and worked directly with the Hammond’s Grandson), waited until Statute of Limitations we’re almost up, to file the appeal. The Hammonds Reported to Prison, January 4, 2016. I know, because I was at the #LibertyRally in Burns, Oregon on January 2, 2016. After the rally, (I personally saw Ammon at this rally, walking with the crowd, in below zero cold) is when the group took over The Refuge!

      Liked by 4 people

    • Fools Gold says:

      Damn iPhone and no editor. Important change above: from”would fathom” to “wouldn’t fathom”.


  10. So it would appear that Federal Agencies were allowed to operate with impunity through at least 6 administrations and allowed to steal land from private citizens under the guise of “regulatory taking”.
    Thank you President Trump for providing this pardon and clearing this family’s name.
    The only “crime” here was committed by our “benevolent” federal government.

    Liked by 4 people

    • glissmeister says:

      Uranium rights. The stooges and animus is what it is, but at bottom is the usurpation and consolidation of uranium rights in the American West. Appears to be a long-time Clinton project. Appears to be at the root much evil and wrongdoing.

      Liked by 1 person

      • rrick says:

        The Grand Staircase-Escalante in S. UT/N AZ fits hand in glove with that. It is a National Monument of about 2 million acres formed in the waning days of Slick Willie’s term. It was a low down dirty rotten land grab. Ranchers are still ticked off mightily. And you know what it was about? Starts with U, ends with ranium.

        Liked by 1 person

  11. Parfie says:

    With any Luck, when they get home (Private Flight), I’ll be there!

    Liked by 3 people

    • Maquis says:

      Give ’em our best. If you happen to visit LaVoy’s final resting place, well, ask a Blessing, if you might. Really need to swing down and visit myself before long, if I can travel.


  12. theyahoo says:

    1. This was the land where Uranium One Uranium originated. Look it up.
    2. The ambush was rogue FBI agents starting it and finishing it. Look it up.
    3. Connect the U1 with Clinton foundation. Look it up.
    4. Connect U1 to BHO. Look it up.

    This pardon is FAR FAR FAR bigger then you know. Score one of the good guys.

    Liked by 6 people

  13. jojols17 says:

    Thank u TRUMP …I’VE been a big supporter of all the HAMMONDS N BUNDY’S….BLM NEEDS TO BE ALL HUNG …WHAT Was done to these families was so unjust…all because of THE CLINTONS N OBUMAMUTT N FBI N SENATOR (DIRTY )HARRY REID…n many more over URANIUM….

    Liked by 2 people

  14. Running Fast says:

    Was literally in Burns OR two days ago. Watched my son play at the city park enjoying the crisp sound of a country band singing “Proud to be an American”. That area is pure Americana and this pardon is further proof our President is working to redeem the soul of this country… beautiful!

    Liked by 4 people

  15. jojols17 says:

    Not mention the FBI KILLED LeVoy Finicum in COLD BLOOD n would of KILLED the other’s in the CAR if they could of gotten away with it……they were filmed n r murderers ….fire those POS FLUNKY FBI AGENTS INVOLVED IN THIS FIASCO…KARMA WILL PREVAIL…

    Liked by 1 person

  16. dimbulbz says:

    I thought there had to be more to this than just some land. That is pretty harsh country out there. The feds are so arrogant, it makes me sick what people have had to deal with because of arrogant Government employees who think they have the right to everything that belongs to everyday people.


  17. Ned2 says:

    Time to organize a little retribution.
    Put these maniacal bureaucrats either back in their place or below ground.


  18. 2packs4sure says:

    T R U M P !


  19. jeans2nd says:

    Read about this in the a.m. over at Stella’s. What fantastic news. L’il Bro was in Texas at the time of the Bundy involvement, 2014 iirc, and headed up there to help.

    “…the Lord has anointed me…to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to those who are bound…” Isaiah 61:1

    Wonder how much of a hand, if any, AG Jeff had in this. And Don Jr, a big outdoors guy, recently spent the day with his dad, our Pres Trump.
    At any rate, a yuge thank you to all concerned. May the Hammonds spend the rest of their lives in the joy and peace of this day.

    Liked by 1 person

  20. NebraskaFilly says:

    Ah, yes…..good old Harry Reid involved as well……again, just a reminder – same sheriff also involved at the original Bundy stand-off over the cattle and the Las Vegas massacre……

    Liked by 1 person

  21. got243kids says:

    Followed this and read everything I could get my hands on about it prior to discovering the tree house. I AM OVER JOYED at this pardon. We have us a real constitutionalist as President of the United States. I never thought this could happen for these magnificent people. HooYah!

    Liked by 1 person

  22. Joseb says:

    Goodlooking women in that family.

    Liked by 1 person

  23. Justbill says:

    I’ve followed this story for a long time. Unfortunately there are a hundred more just like it over the years that are just as bad. My aunt and uncle losing their entire herd. Another aunt and uncle losing their sawmill. Entire towns that were once thriving communities that are now ghost towns. My wife asked me years ago if I ever missed that life. “Every day” I told her. She then asked me if I would ever go back to it. I just said “no”. I didn’t bother telling her the rest of the story. Because I couldn’t quite believe it myself. Thank God there is some vindication out there. Far too little of it though.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. For those commenting..
    President Trump hjas Righted a Wrong..

    ALL this WAS for the Minerals,, re: uranium/Gold etc etc..
    I had the files on My old Hard Drive of USGS charts on the areas Mentioned..
    MUCHO Gold & Uranium was “noted” in those USGS Survey’s.. Quite a bit..
    If I recall the Bundy’s also “owned” the Surface/Mineral rights..
    The Bundy’s were prosecuted for NOT Giving up the Mining/Mineral Rights..
    Hillary & Obama (and a certain setting Senator)..
    Went to “WAR” over this against the Bundy’s and “other Ranchers” Whom “sold out”
    GOD Bless Our President for righting a Horrible Wrong against those Great AMERICANS..
    It was NEVER about Grazing, nor Cattle.. It was over Mineral Rights!


    • Maquis says:

      I’d like to see the EPA reverse their permitting the Russians to destroy potable aquifers via chemical “mining” of uranium. Still, I’d rather see every single participant in in the Uranium One Treason swing.

      Liked by 1 person

  25. No one could ever convince me that the ‘rank and file’ are good people. I saw the videos of the ‘good people of the FBI’ at the ranch.
    These federal agents are the rank and file. They know better. I wish so badly that prosecutors could be held accountable for their crimes.


  26. Republicanvet91 says:

    I own property that borders BLM land. I have to cross BLM property from a public road to access some of my own property where my house is. I have a another road from the same public road that crosses my property to access thousands of acres of BLM property from one direction, but there is a road from another direction to get to the same acreage.
    I called various BLM officials over months trying to set up a meeting with them to discuss whether I needed an easement to cross about 75 feet of BLM property to access my own house. After months of trying, I finally got a meeting with them. I went into the local BLM office for the meeting and met with the woman who brought another woman with her who claimed to be a BLM attorney. We discussed my access to my house which they didn’t seem to care about.

    I later found out the BLM cannot block my access to my own house.

    We also discussed the other road that led up to the many thousands of acres of BLM land. They were VERY interested in that, and wanted to know if I would give them an easement for them to allow access across my property to BLM land.

    I refused and told them why. I said the previous owner did not provide an easement for BLM, and that I was tired of the public parking anywhere on my land, tearing down fences and leaving trash all over. I said the pipe gate across that road would stay locked.

    They lied to me and said other landowners have given them easements across property they owned. I later found out no other landowner gave them an easement.

    I continued to refuse to give in, and the “attorney” then said they would might just take me to court and seize it. I said if that happened, I would dig a trench across that road (my property) with my backhoe, and nobody would be using the road. The conversation ended fairly soon after, and I left.

    I have been asked a couple times since by BLM and Fish and Wildlife for easements, and I refused each time and told them why. I refuse to be threatened by thugs.

    I have not heard from them in a few years now.

    It was AFTER all this that the stand-off happened with the Bundy’s. It was LONG after this that I read about Dan Love, one of the main BLM thugs that participated in the Bundy stand-off. Do a search on his name, and you will find a large number of news articles in Utah and elsewhere of his thug actions against citizens, including harassing an older gentleman in Blanding, Utah until the man committed suicide.

    BLM and Fish and Wildlife are out of control agencies with zero oversight by Congress. In fact, in one of the articles about BLM actions, there is mention of a former House member named Chenoweth and her husband being on the receiving end of BLM thug actions.

    Liked by 2 people

  27. rrick says:

    Outstanding! The fervent prayers of a righteous man availeth much. I know many, many people have been praying for this. Now, President Trump please turn your attention to Jerry Delemus.

    Liked by 1 person

  28. navysquid says:

    I read how many are happy about Pres Trump’s decision, as am I, as commenters state that they did not know how Pres Trump would rule based on Kelo comments and other past comments. I was thinking maybe we were believing what the MSM was spoon feeding us, this includes me, at that time not really knowing our President’s heart.

    I think well over a year now, Pres Trump has shown us who he truly is and NOT what the MSM told us he was like…

    Pres Trump is one president I’d love to roll back the 22nd Amendment on as opposed to FDR’s years.


  29. As I opined last night..
    In reference too HARRY REID
    It was all about the MINERALS, nothing more..

    USGS publication..

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s