President Trump Delivers First Remarks After Supreme Court Victory Supporting Travel Restrictions…

Immediately before lunch with members from congress, President Trump delivers remarks in response to the Supreme Court removing a challenge to the administration travel restrictions and vetting process. In a 5-4 decision the Supreme Court upheld the president’s authority to restrict travel from countries who are not compliant with U.S. vetting requirements.

UPDATED Video ADDED

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Government, Iran, ISIS, Islam, media bias, N Korea, North Africa, President Trump, Refugees, Secretary of State, Secretary Pompeo, Supreme Court, Syria, Terrorist Attacks, Transportation, Uncategorized, USA, Venezuela. Bookmark the permalink.

194 Responses to President Trump Delivers First Remarks After Supreme Court Victory Supporting Travel Restrictions…

  1. Aristotle says:

    MAGA

    Liked by 11 people

  2. DanO64 says:

    More winning.

    Liked by 4 people

    • helix35 says:

      Deeply shocking that this was a 5/4 decision. Apparently, the geniuses in the minority believed that because Trump wanted the ban, it was unconstitutional. Every institution has been corrupted by the Left. Thank God DJT won the election; we dodged a bullet.

      Liked by 4 people

  3. peace says:

    Sonia is having a nervous breakdown and went on a 20 minute rant. Someone like her with obvious bias and no respect for the constitution should never be allowed anywhere near a court system.

    Liked by 26 people

    • AmericaFirst says:

      Ideologues gotta ideologue.

      Liked by 14 people

    • rudy1876 says:

      Wise Latina comment should have disqualified her. Ginsberg needs to just get her ass out of there.

      Liked by 16 people

    • Steve says:

      Like all of Obama’s team, she never escaped student activism.

      Liked by 6 people

    • chooseamerica says:

      My fellow patriots, if you don’t do anything else today, please watch this 13 min video.

      It explains how our entire governmental system got to where it is today. Everything, from the federal judge who forced this travel ruling to the supreme court to where our magnificent president is going to take; not only our country, but the world.

      It’s by far the best video I’ve seen in my lifetime.

      God bless President Trump and protect him on each step along the way.

      Liked by 9 people

      • Disgusted says:

        Such terrible audio quality made it impossible for me to understand this video. Such a loss.

        Like

      • Julia Adams says:

        Poor Rachel, such a sick, sick woman. She has no business hosting a show on cable television. I think she is a disgrace and a complete nut job, too.

        Liked by 1 person

      • dustycowpoke says:

        What an amazing video. Well done!

        Liked by 1 person

      • Deplorable_Infidel says:

        Overall an excellent video. A minor quibble I have occurred at about the first 30 seconds, where it was stated these forces of darkness “were about to be permanently eradicated from the earth.”

        I would point out that scripturally there can be significant setbacks to Satan’s “New World Order”
        2Thessalonians 2:7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.

        during this dispensation of grace
        Ephesians 3:2 If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward:

        However great our current victories (whether they set back this wickedness 10, 100 or 1000 years), someday things will go downhill again. It will continue until the Lord Jesus Christ physically returns to the earth to set things straight.

        Zechariah 14:4 And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, and there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south.

        There is a “course of this world” followed by the children of disobedience”.

        Eph 2:2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:

        Which is why we are supposed to be proclaiming the truth (salvation by the finished work of the Lord Jesus Christ at Calvary as a free gift) while fighting the forces of darkness. That is the will of God for us.

        1Timothy 2:1 I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men; 2 For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty.

        3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; 4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.

        1Cor 15:3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:

        Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
        9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.

        Like

  4. AmericaFirst says:

    Just looking at the seven countries involved it beggars belief that anyone objected to this travel ban. Really, they don’t want to have quantifiable vetting from NORTH KOREA?

    Liked by 5 people

    • Lemmy says:

      NK, Venezuela. I thought it was a Muslim ban snowflakes.

      Liked by 6 people

      • kroesus61 says:

        5 of 57 Muslim majority nations with 93% of world wide Muslims NOT affected is hard to justify as a “Muslim ban” but then reason and common sense never get in the way of a prog/commie cause

        Liked by 3 people

        • EggsX says:

          Even if it was a Muslim or Christian or Yazidi ban or whatever – it should be constitutional. We ban Nazi’s from entry. If Nazi’s claim to be a religion, we would all of a sudden have to let them in? The president should be able ban any person/people he deems to be a national security threat. According to the courts, he just can’t ban American citizens or those that are in the legal process (green cards/Visas) from coming.

          As a principle, the courts cannot control our immigration system because they suffer from ‘no skin in the game’.

          Liked by 4 people

          • Lindenlee says:

            How about all those invaders from Mexico and CA, and all the DACA invaders, 95% of whom have committed at least one felony? Did we ever get to vet ANY OF THEM?

            I am REALLY pissed off at this return to “catch and release”. Maybe it is not as bad as I thought, but this will create a HUGE influx, especially with the Mexican election a week away. I pray to God that our president activates that emergency seclaration ffom December, and applies it to the invazion from the south.

            Like

            • G. Combs says:

              AG Sessions reorganized how illegal boarder jumpers were handled so they were no longer released into the USA and cases would be expedited. He is adding 35 assisting United States attorneys at the border to prosecute illegal entries and moving 18 supervisory judges that don’t have existing caseloads to the border to expedite cases. It will be about a 50% increase in the number of immigration judges.

              On top of that Sessions has gone from a First-in First-tried system to a Last-in First-tried system that deals with the fresh batch NOW instead of turning them loose in the country and hoping they come back for their hearings.

              This makes me GRIN from ear to ear!
              Attorney General Sessions Delivers Remarks Discussing the Immigration Enforcement Actions

              “[…]People are not going to caravan or otherwise stampede our border.

              We need legality and integrity in the system.

              That’s why the Department of Homeland Security is now referring 100 percent of illegal Southwest Border crossings to the Department of Justice for prosecution. And the Department of Justice will take up those cases.

              I have put in place a “zero tolerance” policy for illegal entry on our Southwest border. If you cross this border unlawfully, then we will prosecute you. It’s that simple.

              If you smuggle illegal aliens across our border, then we will prosecute you.

              If you are smuggling a child, then we will prosecute you and that child will be separated from you as required by law.

              If you make false statements to an immigration officer or file a fraudulent asylum claim, that’s a felony.

              If you help others to do so, that’s a felony, too. You’re going to jail.

              So if you’re going to come to this country, come here legally. Don’t come here illegally.

              In order to carry out these important new enforcement policies, I have sent 35 prosecutors to the Southwest and moved 18 immigration judges to the border. These are supervisory judges that don’t have existing caseloads and will be able to function full time on moving these cases. That will be about a 50 percent increase in the number of immigration judges who will be handling the asylum claims.[…]”

              OH I really hope ALL those Progressive nitwits who went down to Mexico to set-up the How-To seminars end up IN JAIL!!

              Liked by 2 people

              • Deplorable_Infidel says:

                “On top of that Sessions has gone from a First-in First-tried system to a Last-in First-tried system that deals with the fresh batch NOW instead of turning them loose in the country and hoping they come back for their hearings.”

                I guess that takes care of what side AG Sessions is really on, doesn’t it? I will save your comment to my notes, so the next time someone has a comment questioning the integrity of AG Sessions, I can drop that link on them.

                I believe sundance had posted very late last year or early this year that AG Sessions will need to be in place for when all this other non-election stuff “hits the fan”. When the time comes, I am sure AG Sessions will be expressing profound regret at what happened to Mr. Rosenstein, “because there were such high hopes for him” after all the years of “faithful government service”..

                Like

          • David A says:

            Once again simply, ANY belief system that preaches removal of our constitutional liberties, the establishment of religious political rule, elevates certain faiths above all others and denigrates equal rights for women, allows legalised murder and rape, and FGM, can and SHOULD be banned, and such IDEALS can NEVER be protected by labeling them “religious”.

            Like

  5. Wait until PDJT puts a temporary halt to ALL legal immigration until the accountability, location and disposition of all illegal aliens is determined! If he ever did that, I’d kiss my own back side on the city hall steps at high noon on the 4th of July and give you all two hours to draw a crowd to watch!

    Liked by 18 people

  6. TMonroe says:

    Still stunned but not surprised by this from someone appointed to adjudge the constitutionality of what is brought before the body:

    https://apnews.com/3a20abe305bd4c989116f82bf535393b/Court-upholds-Trump-travel-ban,-rejects-discrimination-claim

    “Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a dissent that based on the evidence in the case “a reasonable observer would conclude that the Proclamation was motivated by anti-Muslim animus.””

    What place does the canard of intent and motivation have here? Isn’t this about what the executive branch and the chief executive is entitled to do?

    Also, given the facts that the relationship of this country and its commander-in-chief is actually quite robust with many countries with a Muslim-predominant societies — as well as the sizable number of Iraqi and Afghani people being granted Special Immigration Visas after working with our military (I.e. coming legally after the effort of an actual background check), her contention smacks of the ignoring facts that she accuses the majority opinion of holding.

    Liked by 18 people

    • Sentient says:

      I see nothing wrong with animus toward Islam.

      Liked by 6 people

      • jimbo says:

        Why should we be troubled, when we have consistently been preached to by Bush repubs and Clinton dems that we must stay at war with radical islam, even though WE aren’t allowed to even say the words “radical islam”.

        Like

    • emet says:

      A reasonable observer would conclude that Justice Sotomayer’s views are tainted by anti-Trump animus.

      Liked by 13 people

    • The Devilbat says:

      “motivated by anti-Muslim animus.”” Yeah Sonia, your dumb assed views are why the communist usurper Obama chose you for the supreme court.

      How about all those muslims in Venezuela? they make up a massive 0.4% of the population.

      How about all those muslims in North Korea? They make up a whopping 0.2% of the population.

      Liked by 3 people

      • covfefe_USA says:

        Hahahahaha!! Excellent points, Sir.

        And let us not forget her hot mike moment, proclaiming herself as ‘the poster child for affirmative action’. Maroon, I tell ya.

        Liked by 2 people

    • Steve says:

      Like Roe Wade and the homosexual “marriage” debacles, her opinion is based upon feelings and emotions, not reason.

      Liked by 2 people

    • nbkilgore says:

      I dedicate the dissenting Justices who wear their feelings on the cuffs of their sleeves this song; Nothing more than feelings……

      Liked by 1 person

    • If by the power of God we were to achieve a super majority in the U.S. Senate, could these truly anti-constitution Supreme Court Judges be impeached and removed based upon demonstrable evidence they are not upholding US laws, but rather upholding their ideologies?

      Liked by 1 person

    • jimbo says:

      Havent we been consistently told “WE ARE AT WAR” by everyone from Mccain to Kerry and all the globalists in between? How do these open border globalists justify the continued ramp up and spending of trillions along with the blood of our military and at the same time leave our borders wide open TO ANYONE who walks in?

      Am I the only one who sees this massive conflict of positions from the never Trump globalist repukes like Ryan and McCain as well as their Bush friendly Dems like Clintons and Kerry?

      It’s just astounding to me that we are TOLD we must avail ourselves to anyone from any country with no security at our borders while our military is sent around the globe to kill enemies that we are AT WAR with.

      Like

    • Julia Adams says:

      So, does the Justice believe Donald Trump does not have First amendment Rights? Since when is voicing an opposing point of view count as animus?

      Like

    • Robert Smith says:

      Wide Latina

      Like

    • Deplorable_Infidel says:

      “the Proclamation was motivated by anti-Muslim animus.”

      Who gave her a crystal ball and proclaimed her an omniscient mind reader?

      Liked by 1 person

      • David A says:

        It was not however anti muslim,
        It is however reasonable to ban ANYBODY OR GROUP grim ANY belief system that preaches removal of our constitutional liberties and the establishment of alternative political rule, elevates certain faiths above all others and denigrates equal rights for women, allows legalised murder and rape, and FGM, can and SHOULD be banned, and such IDEALS can NEVER be protected by labeling them “religious”.

        Like

  7. Non=combative. says:

    Can’t wait until PDJT appoints another Conservative to SCOTUS……..

    Liked by 11 people

  8. Pat Frederick says:

    constitutionally the decision seems to be an easy one—feelings change, the country’s mood shifts from time to time, that’s why we should FOLLOW THE CONSTITUTION…can’t go wrong!

    and yes, gotta admit I’m happy the injunctionalists (made up a word lol) got slapped down!

    Liked by 8 people

  9. fleporeblog says:

    THANK YOU PRESIDENT TRUMP!

    I also want to thank Senate Majority Leader McConnell for having the guts to hold the seat until after the election. I read Salena Zito’s incredible book, The Great Revolt. Voter after voter from the 5 states she focused on (IA, MI, PA, OH and WI) said that one of the reason they voted for our President was because of the Supreme Court pick.

    I put together a thread about the Turtle below:

    Liked by 9 people

  10. AmericaFirst says:

    Since the Manchurian did the DACA (yes, I know it’s Unconstitutional as was DAPA), could President Trump eliminate the “Diversity Visa” pending actual legislation? You know, for safety’s sake.

    Liked by 5 people

  11. Katherine McCoun says:

    Anyone find the extended video of people speaking around the table? I have had no luck…

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Pam says:

    Live coverage with Lookner:

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Pam says:

    I think this is the extended version:

    Liked by 3 people

  14. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 17 people

    • nbkilgore says:

      T10, knowing the hurt feelings society, we know they will push the issue even though the relief they seek is contrary to the rule of law and the US Constitution. Hurt feelings lawsuits should be fined and penalized for wasteful expenditures of Tax Payers hard earned money.

      Liked by 4 people

    • EggsX says:

      I agree with Justice Thomas, however it would need to be carefully considered. DAPA was held up by an injunction. It is important that a great miscarriage of the law by the executive can be stopped.

      Liked by 2 people

    • JX says:

      Thomas is great.

      Like

    • Julia Adams says:

      Yes! Yes! This John Elwood is the news I have been waiting for.

      Like

    • piper567 says:

      Troublemaker, its coming.
      There WILL be an end to this attempted usurpation of our judicial system.
      Baby step, but steps.
      Betcha Trump and Thomas talked shop on the Judge’s B-Day, ha!
      I’ve never quite understood how States can kvetch ab the Feds stealing their rights, and then these State Courts can, all by themselves, steal the rights of the Fed. One crazed State Judge can derail POTUS authority? Don’t get it.
      This little detail inserted by Thomas is golden.

      Like

  15. fleporeblog says:

    Liked by 12 people

  16. fleporeblog says:

    I guess Joe Biden is getting so use to the winning that he decided he wasn’t going to have it happen at his expense!

    Liked by 9 people

  17. fleporeblog says:

    We also had this HUGE win today by the Supreme Court that won’t get many headlines:

    Liked by 13 people

  18. Scoot4444 says:

    So if Sonia the Justice is biased against a conservative idea her Constitutional Duties could be taken away

    Liked by 3 people

    • Some Old Guy says:

      What Socialists today would wield as a sword today, can and would be used against them or ultimately against the judges themselves in batting down legislation and/or results. Beyond it’s novel and lack of anything resembling objectivity, the analysis is completely unwieldy and subject to gross abuses. It would open the door to days of psychological experts testifying on Presidents and lawmakers men’s rea right away and ultimately devolve further into the potential biases of the judges adjudicating the underlying matter. In short, it would further empower the sole unelected branch of government.

      Liked by 2 people

  19. magatrump says:

    Up yours Dems and MSM. Winning baby!!!!

    Liked by 2 people

  20. MfM says:

    Trump looks like he’s lost weight in his face. At first I thought he was looking wane, but after listening to him talk and his demeanor, I didn’t think so. He maybe tired, but not ridiculously, he looked happy and relaxed.

    Liked by 4 people

    • wolfmoon1776 says:

      Yes! You are definitely right. I think President Trump looks thinner in his suit, too.

      Presidential doctors are notoriously effective nags on health. Their job is to keep the most important guy in government healthy, and they do it!

      Trump was gaining too much weight a while back, and I think the good doctor convinced him that fewer pounds would mean more energy – especially if he wants to double or triple the winning in that second term! 😉

      Liked by 4 people

    • Cheri Lawrence says:

      So funny, I worry about him too all the time if he is looking stressed or tired. Always sending him my energy, love and light.

      Liked by 4 people

    • GB Bari says:

      Big wins like SCOTUS today will always relax the mind and body for awhile. It’s good “tonic” for our Fighter In Chief. I am as happy for him as I am for the country.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

      Gone back to one scoop lately, doctor’s orders. 🙂
      Media frenzy in 3… 2… 1…

      Liked by 3 people

  21. Troublemaker10 says:

    Like

  22. Lady in Red says:

    Sonia is a racist and radical leftist with ties to Soros. Here is some info on her https://www.aim.org/aim-column/sotomayors-left-wing-and-racist-connections/

    Liked by 3 people

    • Lady in Red says:

      Sorry that was in response to Scoot4444

      Liked by 3 people

    • calbear84 says:

      Sotomayor believes in the fiction of social justice more than in she does in the Constitutional rule of law. So naturally Obama the Destroyer picked her for the SC!

      Liked by 2 people

      • Lindenlee says:

        Kagan should have recused herself on the Obergefell case, and so should Ginsburg and possibly Sonia. But they didn’t.

        Conservetives know that conflicts of interest are anathema to a strong rule of law; for leftists, they ARE the reason for being. The conflicts consolidate power, excuse malfeasance, enrich ones coffers, all fhe best reasons for living.

        Like

        • Patriot1783 says:

          Justices are not required to recuse, probably because back in the day it was assumed that each SCOTUS would be above personal bias.

          Like

      • piper567 says:

        calbear, he also could check two boxes on his talley sheet: “minority” (?), and female.
        the two most important qualifications for SCOTUS.

        Like

    • Trump Train says:

      yet the republicans voted for her…….sickening

      Like

  23. Kristin says:

    America is winning…again. No, not tired. Keep going!!

    Liked by 5 people

  24. LDave says:

    Many of the leftists are calling the SCOTUS majority a partisan political decision. (These are the same folks who believe there was “no bias” on the part of the FBI.)

    Liked by 5 people

  25. snellvillebob says:

    We need to deport all those who got in from those countries between the time the small time judge made his ruling and the Supreme Court putting him in his place.

    Liked by 3 people

  26. Atpooka says:

    The globe just got a bit warmer with more melting snowflakes

    Liked by 6 people

  27. Brant says:

    It seems several state AGs are suing Trump to reunite families. I hope he and Sessions take advantage of this by saying they need to take DNA tests to see which child goes with a parent. If there is a mismatch, nab the adult for child trafficking.

    Liked by 10 people

  28. jbowen82 says:

    Hate to rain on our parades too much, but I just listened to a Federalist Society podcast. The FedSoc likes to have a righty and a lefty to have better debate, and the lefty said that it’s likely that on remand to the Hawaii district court, the travel ban EO will be challenged on RFRA (Religious Freedom Restoration Act) grounds as being burdensome to the free exercise of religion by the individual plaintiffs. Hawaii and the other states are probably out, but there were individual plaintiffs and also a Muslim religious association who claimed they were harmed. They will probably still have standing to challenge it, and the same Hawaii judge will probably rule that the EO violates their statutory freedom of religion and reinstate the preliminary injunction. That sounds plausible to me. The Ninth Circuit will again affirm the lower court’s decision, and this will be back at the Supreme Court again in the October 2019 term, with an opinion in 2020.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Nigella says:

      What? So they will take it to the Super Supreme Court? Doubt it

      Like

    • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

      What the debate society lefty said is “likely” really meant “hopefully”.
      9th Circus Court is just asking to be disbanded and reorganized via Congress.

      Liked by 4 people

    • bosscook says:

      Fine. America is watching these shenanigans.

      Liked by 1 person

    • dalethorn says:

      Not a chance. The burden of proofing that “new” evidence is going to be too great for the Commie judges. In fact, as we are looking for more tests of overreach by district courts, that kind of frivolous filing could be useful.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Sylvia Avery says:

      Oh rats, I was speed reading on the Presidential Daily threat and a treeper answered this issue really well, but I didn’t absorb much of it. Something along the lines of Justice Thomas, I think, talked about this in his opinion. Or maybe it was Roberts. Oh well. Anyway, yes, it can go back to the lower court but it will have to have a trial, but the SC stripped out all the nonsense about allowing Candidate Trump’s statements in as evidence so that won’t be allowed in. There was more, I just don’t remember it sadly.

      Like

    • piper567 says:

      j, and SCOTUS will, in an expedient ruling, rule this decision can stay in place as this challenge moves through lower courts.
      this happened before.
      Am I right?

      Like

  29. SouthernTrumpette says:

    It’s frightening that the decision was so close. I pray to God that Trump gets the opportunity to appoint more judges to the Supreme Court. How much longer can Ginsberg and Kennedy hold on? Breyer is also pushing 80. 🙂

    And, yes, props to Mitch McConnell !!

    Liked by 4 people

  30. Cheri Lawrence says:

    That close in the supreme court? No doubt corruption resides there as well. These people have forgotten they are in service to America not the other way around! MAGA!!

    Liked by 5 people

  31. TreeperInTraining says:

    I just stopped in quickly for my daily dose of winnamins.

    I’m on my way home from work and I am just sitting here at a red light….grinning.

    MAGA

    Liked by 5 people

  32. calbear84 says:

    “So I will always be defending the sovereignty, safety and security of the American people…”
    And that’s why you’re the greatest POTUS ever!

    Liked by 1 person

  33. We’ve won a couple good battles today. But bear in mind, Mueller and Rosenstein are still out on our flanks. They pose a threat and I’m sure Mueller is ready to strike again…………and soon. The war is not over yet.

    Liked by 1 person

  34. Publius2016 says:

    Yes, time to deport these People without trial…we don’t know who they are…borders are closed except through ports of entry…not rocket science…must Vet them before entry…SIMPLE!

    Like

  35. conservalicious says:

    Look at what the media headlines read when this was 1st proposed. They got btfo today (except Dershowitz)

    Liked by 3 people

  36. Martin says:

    The Left’s MSM simply cannot tell the truth.

    “…the third version passed the Court…” is the unified narrative, no matter where you listen.

    It’s the content of the “travel ban” EO, not that activist judges failed to acknowledge the Chief Executive’s authority, forcing the issue to SCOTUS to slap their presumptuous butts down.

    The media truly is Public Enemy #1.

    Like

  37. czarowniczy says:

    Local Fox channel is out asking local Moslems what they think of President Trump’s travel ban. Not so much about the SCOTUS saying it’s OK but Trump banning innocent, peace loving, American flag waving, diversity and inclusion supportingl Moslems from visiting The Great Satan….uhhh, the US.
    OK, if this were 1943 would they be out asking local Germans if it was kosher to ban German jew-hating, death to America preaching, out to rule the world (seeing any similarities here?) Nazis from visiting the US? After all, only a small minority of Nazis are bad folks…

    Like

  38. Elwood says:

    Justice Sonia has obviously passed that point of realization that she stands at the cusp of an entire career mewling uselessly in minority opinions.

    Liked by 1 person

  39. Bonitabaycane says:

    In order to MAGA we must take back the Judicial Branch from Liberal, ideologue, activist judges who undermine the law and our country.

    IMO our VSGDJT knows this.

    Make the Judiciary Great Again Mr. President!

    Liked by 1 person

  40. Concerned Virginian says:

    National radio program of Lars Larson: just now he’s talking about (6:35PM Eastern) the Muslim mouthpiece, KEITH ELLISON. Ellison is making the allegation that Justice Gorsuch was BRIBED and PAID OFF to vote the way he did on upholding the travel ban. Ellison said that Justice Gorsuch followed “what his PAY MASTERS told him to do.”

    Like

  41. Echo says:

    So the media, Democrats and Never Trumpers are distraught that people, whose religious instruction book unambiguously instructs them to murder USA infidels, Jews, homosexuals, apostates and women they don’t like, are able to be excluded from America by PDJT?

    Seems simple common sense to me,

    Like

  42. fred5678 says:

    Does this opinion not hold for certain wedding cakes, also??

    Justice Kennedy’s brief concurrence is extremely powerful. This passage was particularly noteworthy: “Here the State requires primarily pro-life pregnancy centers to promote the State’s own preferred message advertising abortions. This compels individuals to contradict their most deeply held beliefs, beliefs grounded in basic philosophical, ethical, or religious precepts, or all of these. And the history of the Act’s passage and its underinclusive application suggest a real possibility that these individuals were targeted because of their beliefs. […] Governments must not be allowed to force persons to express a message contrary to their deepest convictions. Freedom of speech secures freedom of thought and belief. This law imperils those liberties.”

    If I were representing the Christian bakers, I would cite the last 3 sentences, Period.

    Like

  43. Another Scott says:

    The left is hilarious. From an NBC News story:

    “Civil rights groups and Democrats on Tuesday rejected the Supreme Court decision to uphold President Donald Trump’s ban on travel to the United States from several Muslim countries”

    Rejected the decision, what exactly does that mean? Can anyone explain to me how the left thinks?

    Like

    • “ how the left thinks? “ Easy… The left thinks that Hillary won the election. They ignore 8 million illegal immigrant voters, as well as thousands of deceased registered voters. If careful re-counts were continued they would learned that President Trump won the popular vote of legally registered living American voters. Game over.

      Like

    • Robert Smith says:

      Like Obama not enforcing laws he disagreed with.

      Like

    • piper567 says:

      Scott, just as soon as someone explains to me how you can reject a duly elected President.
      p.s. The Left does not think. boo boo.

      Like

  44. Boots says:

    My post on another site, in response to a bleeding heart article. “Ellison” is Keith Ellison, the anti-American, pro-Sharia Muslim Senator from MN.
    ———–

    “Today’s decision undermines the core value of religious tolerance on which America was founded,” Ellison said in a statement shortly after the ruling came down.
    ——————————
    Islam is the most intolerant religion on the face of the earth. It teaches that non-Muslims are less than human and should be made into slaves who pay a yearly tax to avoid execution, or murdered in the name of Allah.

    Allah is NOT the God of the Bible. Allah is Satan, who’s deceived the sons of Ishmael (Ishmael is the patriarchial father of all Arabs) into believing in “Allah”. Like Christians await the return of Jesus, Muslim sawait the return of the “seventh Iman”.

    The Koran says when this person returns to earth, he will partner with Jesus and together they and a world wide Muslim army will slaughter all the Jews, and make all the Christians slaves of Muslims.

    The “seventh Iman” of the Koran is – in reality – the Antichrist of the Bible.

    Keith Ellison is a dangerous Muslim mole agitating and facilitating the Muslim infiltration of America, prepatory to making America a Muslim nation.

    The doctrine of Muslim immigration was established by Mohammed when he was driven from his home town by the townsfolk for being a murderer, hot head, and trouble maker. Jews in Mecca took Mohammed in. Over time, Mohammed grew the number of his followers by claiming he was a prophet of Allah.

    At a prearranged time, Mohammed and his followers murdered every Jewish man, woman, and child, and took over the town of Mecca.

    Thus was born the “Doctrine of Muslim Immigration”, called in Arabic “Hijra” (hidge’-ruh). It teaches that Muslims must immigrate to the land they wish to overtake, set up Muslim only enclaves, build mosques in those enclaves, and teach jihad in the mosques.

    The next step is to advocate and agitate for special treatment, no pork in U.S. prisons, foot baths in schools, special treatment on the job, etc.

    THIS IS WHAT’S BEEN HAPPENING IN AMERICA FOR 25 YEARS.

    THIS IS WHAT OBAMA ACCELERATED DURING HIS REIGN OF TERROR.

    THIS IS WHAT HILLARY “THE LIAR” CLINTON PROMISED SHE’D ACCELERATE IF ELECTED.

    ————————————————————————————–
    **THIS IS WHY WE ARE >>>HAPPY AF<<< TRUMP WAS ELECTED**
    ————————————————————————————–

    Like

    • piper567 says:

      Despite it being heretical, the Koran is widely available translated into English.
      Anyone even moderately interested in what these unfortunates believe can read it for themselves.
      we are without excuse.

      Like

  45. Boots says:

    My other post from another site. If you haven’t already, then read as soon as possible the American Thinker article that outlines the Muslim doctrine of immigration. *Everything* in it is happening in America today, having been accelerated by the Muslim Prince and U.S. Presidential Usurper Barack Barry Lolo Sotoero Hussein Obama; or whatever his real name is – if he even has one.
    ———————————–
    Modern day Trojan horse: the doctrine of Muslim immigration.
    https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/08/the_hijra.html

    The goal of ***ALL*** Muslim immigration is to eventually dominate and control the host country.

    Look no farther than Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, France, and England to see the horrific number of gang rapes (the Koran teaches that Muslim men have a right, from Allah, to kidnap, rape, and torture non-Muslim women); no go zones; and violent assaults and murders against the citizens of these countries.

    The Constitution put the federal government under the control of the citizens of America. While the U.S. federal government has become a terrorist organization similar to the Gestapo, we still have the ability to wrest control back from the evil, Satanic controlled, filthy, lying pigs who daily flip America off.

    However, unlike America, the governments of the above countries do *not* answer to the people. The government decides what it wants to do and the people have no choice but to accept it, because that’s how socialism works.

    Thus, the leaders of the above countries have deliberately flooded their countries with Muslim animals, 90% of whom are fighting age single males. The leaders have also passed laws making it a crime to criticize Islam. That’s why Tommy Robinson was jailed before and re-jailed a few weeks ago.

    The leaders have also told the press and police to *never admit or say Muslims committed the crimes for which the leaders *know* they have committed.

    >>>THAT’S WHAT OBAMA PLANNED FOR AMERICA. HILLARY WAS TO FINISH US OFF.<<<

    We must keep the Muslim invaders out of America by every means available, starting with legal means, if we're to ever avoid becoming victims of Muslim assaults, murders, and to prevent the rape of American women. Even the libtard women who fight to bring these pigs here.

    The Second Amendment may need to be resorted to, in order for American citizens to appropriate the "right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" for which brave men threw off their oppressors 1776, and let the chips fall where they may.

    Like

    • Jayne gilmore says:

      Amen

      Like

    • AmericaFirst says:

      Boots, I think I saw this American Thinker article when it was published in 2009, but thank you for offering us the link again. I bookmarked it.

      The numbers of Muslims in America have gone the wrong direction in the last 9 years, and although I agree they should all not be here, I don’t see any possibility of correcting the situation. Maintaining it may be the best we can do.

      When people claim that the Zero’s legacy is being totally negated I remind them that we still have a country full of refujihadists which we did not have at the beginning of his regime.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Charlotte says:

        To be honest-being a full practicing Muslim is incompatible with living in the West.
        -They want Sharia
        -They want halal food and demand we all eat. In NZ ALL meat is automatically halal unless you get organic meat from a special butcher or import kosher meat from Australia. Kosher slaughter is not allowed inNZ, but halal slaughter is just as bad
        -They want mosques-everywhere
        -They howl at perceived inequalities, demand time off at work for prayers 5x a day
        -They want special toilets
        -They live in enclaves
        -They are in your face aggressive, pushing their muslim ideology
        -They hate our dogs and often poison or kill them
        -They rape our women and children
        -They are intolerant of gays
        -They want 4 wives and will take 1 legal one and 3 de factos who dont work but breed. So called ex wives who the state has to support–in the UK, NZ and Australia.

        When Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone:

        United States — Muslim 1.0%
        Australia — Muslim 1.5%
        Canada — Muslim 1.9%
        China — Muslim 1%-2%
        Italy — Muslim 1.5%
        Norway — Muslim 1.8%

        At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:

        Denmark — Muslim 2%
        Germany — Muslim 3.7%
        United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
        Spain — Muslim 4%
        Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

        From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.

        They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law.

        France — Muslim 8%
        Philippines — Muslim 5%
        Sweden — Muslim 5%
        Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
        The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
        Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%

        When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions ( Paris — car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats ( Amsterdam — Mohammed cartoons).

        Guyana — Muslim 10%
        India — Muslim 13.4%
        Israel — Muslim 16%
        Kenya — Muslim 10%
        Russia — Muslim 10-15%

        After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:

        Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

        At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:

        Bosnia — Muslim 40%
        Chad — Muslim 53.1%
        Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

        From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:

        Albania — Muslim 70%
        Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
        Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
        Sudan — Muslim 70%

        After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:

        Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
        Egypt — Muslim 90%
        Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
        Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
        Iran — Muslim 98%
        Iraq — Muslim 97%
        Jordan — Muslim 92%
        Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
        Pakistan — Muslim 97%
        Palestine — Muslim 99%
        Syria — Muslim 90%
        Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
        Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
        United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

        100% will usher in the peace of “Dar-es-Salaam” — the Islamic House of Peace — there’s supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:

        Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
        Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
        Somalia — Muslim 100%
        Yemen — Muslim 99.9%

        http://www.defendproclaimthefaith.org/tracking_influence_of_muslims.htm

        Like

  46. Boots says:

    The website of Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform is an excellent source of articles on Islamic strategies to dominate the world; including reports from the front lines of the Muslim war on the west in Germany, Sweden, England, Germany, Scotland, and more.
    http://www.cairco.org/issues/islam-terrorism-isis

    This article (link below) is contained in the above website. The article was written in 2004. Since then England has lost the war, and been effectively conquered and subdued by Islam. The Muslims could not have won *without the help of government opening wide the borders and importing Jihadi’s by the millions*
    http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/006198.html
    ~ Lawrence Auster, 2004 ~

    We will have terrorist attacks and threats of terrorists attacks and inconvenient and humiliating security measures and the disruption of ordinary activities FOREVER, as long as Muslims are in the West in any significant numbers. The Muslim terrorists are part and parcel of the Muslim community. According to a survey reported in the Scotsman, 24 percent of Muslims in Britain (I never describe them as “British Muslims”) believe the July 2005 London bombings were justified. Imagine that. Not only do these Muslims in Britain support terrorism against Britain, they’re not afraid to say so openly to a pollster! The unchangeable fact is that wherever there is a sizable Muslim community there will be a very large number of terror supporters and therefore—inevitably—actual terrorists as well.

    This is our future, FOREVER, unless we stop Muslim immigration and initiate a steady out-migration of Muslims from the West until their remaining numbers are a small fraction of what they are now and there are no true believers among the ones that remain. Travelers from Muslim countries must be tightly restricted as well. Muslims must be essentially locked up inside the Muslim lands, with only carefully screened individuals allowed into the non-Muslim world.

    The enemy are among us, in America, in Britain, in the West, and will remain so until we remove them from the West and indeed from the entire non-Muslim world. As extreme as this sounds, it is a no-brainer. There is no other solution. All other responses to this problem add up to meaningless hand-wringing. The hand-wringing will go on FOREVER, along with the terrorist attacks and the threat of terrorist attacks, until we take the ONLY STEPS that can actually and permanently end the threat.

    Like

  47. Charlotte says:

    POLL: Black Americans Prefer Deportation Of Illegal Immigrants

    https://www.dailywire.com/news/32271/poll-black-americans-prefer-deportation-illegal-paul-bois

    Like

  48. Charlotte says:

    White House Adviser Leo: Trump Likely Two More Supreme Court Picks

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/06/24/wh-adviser-leo-trump-likely-two-more-scotus-picks/

    Like

  49. Old Scroll Ranger says:

    It’s interesting that these members of congress are required by the constitution to pass a budget every year, which they gladly did not do during the Obama administration. Now, they are praising PDJT for requiring them to do their job. Clearly, no conviction or leadership in congress to do what they swore to do. Shelby looks nervous and agitated that he’s forced to do his job. Roll Tide.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s