House Intel Committee Announces Uranium One Probe – Three Distinct Components…

House intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes announces the congressional probe into the Russian Uranium One deal.  As described, the initial part of the probe will be to discover if there was actually an ongoing FBI investigation into the company at the time the Obama administration gave the green light for the controversial purchase.

In order to answer that originating question the DOJ has released an FBI informant from their non disclosure agreement (NDA).  If it is confirmed the FBI was actually conducting an investigation – the additional lines of probative value will encompass how the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) approved the purchase during an ongoing FBI investigation.


If the FBI was investigating, and if CFIUS approved the purchase despite the investigation, then it appears congress would move to the third probative point “why”?

Within the third probative point is where the possibility of a quid-pro-quo with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton comes into play.  The financial dynamic behind Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation is substantive, factual, generally well cited, and potentially illegal albeit difficult to prove.

It is within that third dynamic that WikiLeaks previously outlined the exceptionally coincidental connections which align with the quid-pro-quo and encompass Hillary/Bill Clinton, John Podesta, and Russian business and governmental interests.

(Via WikiLeaks – October 2016) Part 1 of the Podesta Emails comprises 2,060 emails and 170 attachments and focuses on Mr Podesta’s communications relating to nuclear energy, and media handling over donations to the Clinton Foundation from mining and nuclear interests; 1,244 of the emails reference nuclear energy. The full collection includes emails to and from Hillary Clinton.

In April 2015 the New York Times published a story about a company called “Uranium One” which was sold to Russian government-controlled interests, giving Russia effective control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.

Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for the production of nuclear weapons, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of US government agencies.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off the deal was the State Department, then headed by Secretary Clinton. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) comprises, among others, the secretaries of the Treasury, Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce and Energy.

As Russian interests gradually took control of Uranium One millions of dollars were donated to the Clinton Foundation between 2009 and 2013 from individuals directly connected to the deal including the Chairman of Uranium One, Ian Telfer.

Although Mrs Clinton had an agreement with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors to the Clinton Foundation, the contributions from the Chairman of Uranium One were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons.  [The foundation admission]

When the New York Times article was published the Clinton campaign spokesman, Brian Fallon, strongly rejected the possibility that then-Secretary Clinton exerted any influence in the US goverment’s review of the sale of Uranium One, describing this possibility as “baseless”.

Mr Fallon promptly sent a memo to the New York Times with a rebuttal of the story (Podesta Email ID 1489).  In this memo, Mr Fallon argued:

“Apart from the fact that the State Department was one of just nine agencies involved in CFIUS, it is also true that within the State Department, the CFIUS approval process historically does not trigger the personal involvement of the Secretary of State. The State Department’s principal representative to CFIUS was the Assistant Secretary of State for Economic, Energy and Business Affairs. During the time period in question, that position was held by Jose Fernandez. As you are aware, Mr Fernandez has personally attested that “Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter.”

What the Clinton campaign spokesman failed to disclose, however, was the fact that a few days before sending his rebuttal to the New York Times, Jose Fernandez wrote on the evening of the 17 April 2015 to John Podesta following a phone call from Mr Podesta (Email ID 2053):

“John, It was good to talk to you this afternoon, and I appreciate your taking the time to call. As I mentioned, I would like to do all I can to support Secretary Clinton, and would welcome your advice and help in steering me to the right persons in the campaign”.

Five days after this email (22 April 2015), Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon wrote a memo to the New York Times, declaring that “Jose Fernandez has personally attested that ‘Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter’,” but Fallon failed to mention that Fernandez was hardly a neutral witness in this case, considering that he had agreed with John Podesta to play a role in the Clinton campaign.

The emails show that the contacts between John Podesta and Jose Fernandez go back to the time of internal Clinton campaign concern about the then-forthcoming book and movie “Clinton Cash” by Peter Schweizer on the financial dealings of the Clinton Foundation.

In an email dated 29 March 2015 (Email ID 2059), Jose Fernandez writes to Podesta:

“Hi John, I trust you are getting a brief rest after a job well done. Thanks no doubt to your recommendation I have joined the CAP [Center for American Progress] board of trustees, which I’m finding extremely rewarding.”

Julian Assange

(Via New York Times) […] “Shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.”

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Donald Trump, Election 2016, energy, media bias, Notorious Liars, Occupy Type Moonbats, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Russia, Uncategorized, US Treasury, USA, Wikileaks. Bookmark the permalink.

435 Responses to House Intel Committee Announces Uranium One Probe – Three Distinct Components…

  1. jmclever says:

    So what is POTUS Trump doing that the deep state is employing such shiny countermeasures and chaff?

    From the Iran-Contra hearings till now, it’s the same script with different actors. Nothing will come of this. Even if there are indictments and convictions there are plenty of liberal judges to overturn or vacate them on appeal.

    Liked by 1 person

    • frankie says:

      The author of has a post today showing how public records helped drive coverage of the JFK assassination documents, Hillary’s uranium scam and the fake Steele dossier, and even the guard who left the scene of the Vegas mass murder for Meh-hi-co for a few days. He believes President Trump is being trasparent on the JFK murder to show the evil of the Deep State and how it might murder another president if unpunished. God and St. Michael the Archangel, keep President Trump, his family and his team and their loved ones in the palms of Your hands.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. well – i’m not going to get wound up about this swamp cartoon – aren’t these the same clown thug puppet operatives that have been “investigating” and damaging The President and MAGA for 9 months? and now we should think they’re going to do the right thing??

    a WEAPONIZED obstructionist deep state thug puppet “congress” • • • ALL of them
    a WEAPONIZED obstructionist deep state thug puppet media
    a WEAPONIZED obstructionist AG/DOJ and FBI

    i’d bet $$$$$$$ that Hilary/bill/barry/lynch/rice/holder/comey are NEVER prosecuted

    but who knows – like i said, a swamp CARTOON to keep ordinary American taxpayers divided and controlled, so i won’t be SURPRISED by anything

    all any of us can do is speculate endlessly…
    because we will NEVER be allowed to see what’s really happening in this foul, top down, globalist psychopath, shadow government VR oligarchy

    as it has ALWAYS been

    Liked by 3 people

  3. 4harrisonblog says:

    Comey and agent Muller’s real mission. Make sure those Uranium One bank and other records never see the light of day.

    Liked by 9 people

  4. YogaDad says:

    Ummmm with the JFK files now this! I am having a great day!


  5. Linda says:

    Okay, we all know all these swamp creatures are guilty as hell. But answer me this: aren’t we beyond the statute of limitations on this case? Can anyone actually be prosecuted at this point in time?


    • Depends on what charges are brought. Treason, for instance, has no statute of limitations.

      There are a number of other crimes that also have no statute of limitations.

      Liked by 6 people

      • Daniel says:

        Being at war is a requirement for a charge of treason isn’t it?


        • Tell that to the Rosenbergs – espionage is close enough and giving our uranium away along with lying to undermine presidential authority in a soft coup just may qualify.

          Liked by 1 person

        • Cuppa Covfefe says:

          No. And in many cases what HildeBEAST, Soros, Obozo&co. are doing is Sedition, attempting to bring down a sitting government. I don’t believe there are any limitations on prosecution on that, either…


      • 4sure says:

        No politician or high gubmint official in the dim party will ever be charged w/Treason.Don’t even waste your time using that word. Matter of fact, the word “TREASON” should be eliminated from our vocabulary. It was a word that was used when patriotism mattered. That ship sailed long ago w/regards to pols.


        • TheLastDemocrat says:

          But we know “treason” is a good word, since Dems have been bringing it up. After all, they brought up “Russia collusion,” and “will you accept the results of this election.”


        • linda7780 says:

          I always hope for the best and believe it can change at any point in time. That is what I hope for our country.


    • waltherppk says:

      Bad faith and fraud are general exceptions to a lot of law including exceptions involving immunity, and even in a case where a criminal prosecution may not be allowed there can still be other action taken to void and nullify illegal contracts or provide injunctive relief or impose civil penalties, forefeitures, license revocations or other actions.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. thluckyone says:

    Wait! Wait! No where have I read that this particular “House Intel Committee” includes Trey Gowdy. Well, HEY! Just so’s they know, without Trey Gowdy their little investigation has NO CREDIBILITY at all. So there. /s

    Liked by 2 people

  7. The LORD’s lament over the orphan He rescued that forgot Whom to be thankful for (Romans 1). Without thankfulness, her allegiance wandered, and much unfaithfulness followed.

    A sobering object lesson even today.
    And YET His compassion may be renewed.

    Let us not stray from our single minded gaze on the One to whom all thanks is due.

    “‘O prostitute, hear the word of the Lord: This is what the Lord God says! Because I see your filthy sins, your adultery with your lovers—your worshiping of idols—and the slaying of your children as sacrifices to your gods, this is what I am going to do: I will gather together all your allies—these lovers of yours you have sinned with, both those you loved and those you hated—and I will make you naked before them that they may see you. I will punish you as a murderess is punished and as a woman breaking wedlock living with other men. I will give you to your lovers—these many nations—to destroy, and they will knock down your brothels and idol altars. They will strip you, take your beautiful jewels, and leave you naked and ashamed. They will burn your homes, punishing you before the eyes of many women. And I will see to it that you stop your adulteries with other gods and end your payments to your allies for their love.”

    “Then at last my fury against you will die away; my jealousy against you will end, and I will be quiet and not be angry with you anymore.”

    (Ezekiel 16:35-42)

    Liked by 1 person

  8. andyocoregon says:

    I just clicked on and noticed there are at least 7 separate articles concerning the Uranium One investigation. Finally, it’s more than just FoxNews reporting this major event.
    I didn’t bother to read CNN’s articles since I figured they would just be slanted against President Trump one way or another.

    Liked by 3 people

  9. positron1352 says:

    There were many laws that were broken. A whole list.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Daniel says:

    One observation from this so far. As the Russian narrative is fully backfiring, the Republican committees aren’t going to get any results EXCEPT for a massive amount of damage to Democrats. Even hard-core Democrats are backing off of their support for Obama and the Clinton gang.

    It will be HARD for a Democrat to get elected into any new seats and they are very likely to lose more seats. And does this “help” the cause? Yes and no… mostly no unless president Trump can get more RINOs to retire.


  11. Bendix says:

    I don’t have much to add, except that something Rush Limbaugh said, speaking about a scandal that involved a Republican, said that many times it is true that higher-ups have no idea what went on, because they have people working for them who do not have to be told, they just know what to do.


  12. StrandedinCA says:

    Maybe it’s just wishful thinking on my part . . . but I believe a see a new writing on the wall. I am starting to see the media asking questions of DWS and hearing commentary from the talking heads on the scandal (even Chris Matthews weighed in for goodness sake!) As we all know the leftist media gets their marching orders every day and are in lock step with their masters (whom I believe to be Soros and his minions). I think we’re seeing that they will protect Obama and company at all costs, and they are starting to see the Clintons and their cronies as the albatross around their necks. I think we’ll see the split happening soon and they will throw Ms. Clinton to the dogs. Let’s hope the Republicans in Congress can bring themselves to take the gift that will be thrown into their laps – but I won’t be surprised if there are many Republicans that step up to protect her.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Daniel says:

      Desperately seeking fall-guys.

      Remember when Jeff Sessions in his most recent senate appearance stated that some people have already gone to jail or prison over the Uranium One deal? It sort of confirms there was an FBI investigation into the Uranium One deal. But no one IMPORTANT was convicted or even touched in the whole thing. (Probably, some who have knowledge of the crimes of the famous people were charged, convicted and sentenced as a way of keeping the whole thing quiet)

      But since this OLD NEWS is now new again, in order to protect the queen, they will need a public hanging of someone else. DWS is already toast from the Imran Awan ‘matter.’ So why not serve some sort of concurrent sentencing for it?


    • linda4298 says:

      The Clintons will go under the bus, they are no longer useful, as long as it protects Obama, they want to shield Obama.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Blue Moon says:

        Do you really thing Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton will go down for this? No, I don’t think so. I can hear both of them telling obozo “If we go down then you go down with us”. It will be interesting to see which one is the dirtiest and who comes out winning. I think the Clinton’s have met their match with obozo.


      • Bendix says:

        Therein lies the problem, as Hillary has certainly worked out something along the lines of a “should anything happen to me” expose.
        They can’t really prevent that ahead of time, as they don’t know exactly what form it will take.
        I think some of this is possibly only known by Obama, Valerie, Hillary and Bill.


      • cjzak says:

        I agree. When the NYT goes against her that is significant. imo. Somebody must have put the word out to these minions that Hillary needs to go. Just a wild thought, but I think she is seriously wanting to run again in 2020 despite what she says and the Dems and their money men funders want no part of that at all.

        Time to cut her loose and for her continuing resistance she gets the bus running over her with no protective shield and only token support. Only thing that might soften the blow is if Obama is under fire and threat from her or the opposition. Then they might let her off more easily as long as she agrees to protect their agenda and their legacy puppet, O.

        Just my musings on what’s unfolding. I think the left is very afraid she might assert power again somehow, possibly black mailing them, and they want her to get lost. The lefties must not be too afraid of what she has on them at this point but who knows what she really has hidden in her secret stash. However, they probably have as much or more on her, so they are ok saying sayonara to her.

        This stuff is fascinating to watch. She will not give up her crazed power obsession easily that’s for sure. Problem is, Billy is in no condition to help out even if he wanted to, which he probably doesn’t because he hasn’t a clue what’s going on anymore. He looks very frail and confused these days.


  13. Paco Loco says:

    It really is unbelievable and outrageous that the Obama regime permitted the sale of 20% of US uranium to a company essentially owned by Russians who then turned around and sold that uranium to Iran who’s building a nuclear bomb to destroy the US. The news on the Trump dossier is just a diversion away from the real treason, the Uranium One deal. Everyone on the committee that approved this sale should be held accountable for enabling this travesty.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. JohnMcStain says:

    All this drama! Yet at the end of the day, absolutely nothing will happen, just like the 403 times before this “scandal”. For 404th time evidence was found of criminality, and this time it will be different? Yea, sure.

    Liked by 2 people

  15. paulraven1 says:

    Does anybody take congressional investigations seriously anymore? I sure as hell do not.

    Liked by 3 people

  16. freddy says:

    Come on people there is no reasonable attorney that would prosecute any of this. there are only like 20 federal statutes broken and direct proof of collusion. Treason is not a stretch here… Yet Trump had to fire the IRS jerk instead of Sessions. That says it all. Sessions is neutered and Mueller is running DOJ and FBI is totally corrupt…So who on earth will prosecute or recommend it. Gowdy…..hahahahahahahahahah This is just another chapter in the ruse written by the swamp…….

    Liked by 2 people

  17. 4sure says:

    This is a uniparty scam. Both parties involved. Pubs. were in control of House and Senate and could have stopped the deal. They did not. Shows they are useless. Therefore, nothing will come of this. It will be another show hearing to pacify the sheep. Same for the Iran pallets of cash aided and abetted by Corker/McConnell.

    We will do nothing but talk and blitch about it. They know it. We know it. No one will be held accountable. The swamp uniparty has this crap down to a science. CIA killed Kennedy. Bush Sr. knew it, Bush Jr. knew it., Clinton knew it. Obama knew it. They did not cross the CIA and deep state. I’m sure Sessions knew it. You don’t cross the deep state and survive. The republic has been taken over w/o a single shot being fired. The entire Intelligence community would have to be disbanded. Every one fired. Same for the DOJ. Same for every fed. LEO entity. Same for the State dept. Same for the IRS. Since that will never happen, there is not going to be any changes.

    We are a glorified Banana republic. Nothing more.When Lindsay Graham goes to NJ to testify as a character witness for a felon corrupt dim. politician, it is apparent we have become no better than a third world shit hole country.

    Rant over, for now. There will be more, I’m sure. I do not tolerate criminals very well. I’m used to
    seeing their sorry asses in jail. And being governed by them really sucks.

    Liked by 3 people

    • waltherppk says:

      When there is no “remedy at law” because the needed agency is unavailable or dysfunctional then vigilante justice certainly has a legitimate role.


    • TPW says:

      Nothing will be done ….well…..because we won’t do what is necessary……as long as everyone has the “I’ve got mine and don’t want to risk it being taken away” attitude they have us right were they want us…silent victims. When the masses realize that we are all being screwed it will be too late. Trump is buying us time. We are going to have to resort to leftist tactics and worse…….just voting ….with the cheating going on is not going to change anything. There are some in Congress who are disgusted and will try to get at the truth….Nunes is one… but he is outranked and outnumbered by the corrupt ruling class.

      Liked by 1 person

  18. Donna in Oregon says:

    The $145 million. Follow the money from the Clinton Foundation. Payments.

    I have been saving this old Breitbart post because this is the smoking gun.

    Good thing President Trump has selected a new acting Director for the IRS. The Clinton Foundation will need to be audited.


  19. freddy says:

    Gee do ya think Hillary got the uranium deal so Obama could enable Iran… birthplace of Valerie and good muslims… nuclear program getting around many laws and sanctions. A little kid can figure this out and one look at the suspects confirms they are liars…………Barney Fife could indict these morons but the corruption is too deep and we will lose the country if we don’t mobilize around this lawlessness and corrupt organizations like the FBI…………….Down with the Deep state…….

    Liked by 1 person

    • Donna in Oregon says:

      The IRS took down Capone. This is why President Trump has tuned up the IRS.

      There is no way the Swamp and the Deep State is going to punish it’s members. We can forget about any criminal prosecutions.

      Does anyone actually believe that there is still evidence and witnesses?

      The significant personnel in the DOJ, Capitol Hill, and the MSM that has been bought and paid for is overwhelming. Just like in the Capone days. The IRS audit makes the most sense.

      Liked by 1 person

  20. pcockroft says:

    We are way pass congressional investigation. The whole group need to be in court being prosecuted and charged with treason. Where is the DOJ. Making more deals to sell uranium?
    Trump’s enemies are the FBI and CIA so why is he following their advice on the Kennedy papers?let us decide the fate of the deep,state as we are not stupid just uninformed.


  21. IMO says:

    Clintons Engaged in ‘On-the-Record Quid Pro Quo’, FBI Informant Lawyer Says (VIDEO)


  22. Grandma Covfefe says:

    Indirectly related, but interesting to see and keep in mind. Notice names on the board of Center for American Progress (CAP) 2017. Jose Fernandez joined it in 2015.
    I didn’t know Daschle was involved. Neera-well-known garbage. John Podesta is the Founder of CAP. Tom Steyer put out an anti Trump Ad last Monday. Jonathan Lavine. founder of Bain Capital. Looks like a bunch of little Trump-hating cockroaches.

    Board of Directors

    Sen. Tom Daschle, Chair
    Neera Tanden, President
    Glenn Hutchins
    Jonathan Lavine
    John Podesta
    Susan Sandler
    Tom Steyer
    Donald Sussman
    Hansjörg Wyss

    Liked by 1 person

    • Cuppa Covfefe says:

      I said this on another thread, but in this context it bears repeating. As usual, the tentacles of Soros are in CAP, too. From

      CAP is a key member of the Shadow Party, a network of non-profit activist groups organized by George Soros and others to mobilize resources — money, get-out-the-vote drives, campaign advertising, and policy initiatives — to advance Democratic Party agendas.

      If it’s evil, causes pain, supports sedition (cf “Color Revolutions”), makes him ill-gotten gains, goes against GOD and country, you can bet that Gyorgi Schwartz (George Soros) was there…


    • jeans2nd says:

      Check out the members of the State Dept boards, GMa – much is revealed.

      Clinton donor received top spot on State Department intel board
      “”He was a donor, a recent donor to Hillary Clinton’s campaign and also gave as much as $250,000 to his foundation,” presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump said Friday. “They all looked, they said ‘Where did this guy come from?’ He made a contribution of $250,000 all of a sudden he’s on this very important, vital board. This position dealt with tactical nuclear weapons and had Top Secret clearance and he knew nothing about it.””

      Liked by 1 person

  23. somaspecialist says:

    Wow with the negative comments on here…you guys make it seem like voting for TRUMP didn’t mean anything…nice to know you “patriots” are such quitters….please don’t join the President in his foxhole…most you complain about the NO BACKBONE cucks in CONGRESS…point the mirror at yourselves…you guys are acting the same way


    • Cuppa Covfefe says:

      I think we’re seeing the early results of Soros’s $18B being spread around. The “under-the-bridge” folks are everywhere right now, even over here in the European media (including the German fawning sycophants of the NYT, CNN, and Washed-Up-Post)…

      Watch out for and pray about November 4th. Antifa (et. al.) have a lot planned…sigh…


  24. individualright says:

    Obama had to get his fingers on some transfer

    Liked by 2 people

  25. Deborah @UnTamedInSD says:

    so i keep hearing this argument from the left that hillary was one of 8 that had to sign off on the sale to Uranium One. While attempting to debunk the pay for play part of this.

    So here is my question:
    Has anyone thought to consider, ask or investigate whom of those others (the 7) may have gotten “donations” via the clintons? or any of the “Russians”? – It just seems to me the chatter heads even on foxnews fail to ask this question and they just let their left chatterheads slide.

    Liked by 2 people

  26. Damion Blackthorn says:

    When we hang the capitalists they will sell us the rope we use.
    Joseph Stalin

    Did he know the Clintons??

    Liked by 1 person

  27. WSB says:

    Paul Singer and the Washington Free Beacon were the ones to initiate the oppo research on Trump. Just out from Lou. Apparently, they stopped the payments in May.


  28. Fred says:

    Where is Sessions hiding?


  29. waltherppk says:

    Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men ? The Russian Pepe knows.


  30. Donna in Oregon says:

    I’ve been keeping a file on this since it started…..

    Hillary Clinton may need to do more than clarify the timeline for the CFIUS approval of the ARMZ-Uranium One deal.

    She may also have to explain whether she failed to disclose to Assistant Secretary Fernandez, the State Department representative on CFIUS, that several executives at Uranium One made millions of dollars in contributions to the Clinton Foundation immediately before and after CFIUS reviewed and approved the ARMZ-Uranium One deal, CFIUS Case No. 10-40, in 2010.

    Liked by 3 people

  31. Donna in Oregon says:

    Senator John Barrasso, a Republican from Wyoming, where Uranium One’s largest American operation was, wrote to President Obama, saying the deal “would give the Russian government control over a sizable portion of America’s uranium production capacity.”

    “Equally alarming,” Mr. Barrasso added, “this sale gives ARMZ a significant stake in uranium mines in Kazakhstan.”

    ARMZ and Uranium One had gone through the CFIUS review and approval practice a year earlier in 2009, when ARMZ announced that it was acquiring a 17 percent interest in Uranium One. That deal was consider a “covered transaction” under FINSA, and was reviewed and approved by CFIUS in 2009. Surprisingly the 2009 Annual Report submitted to Congress by CFIUS inaccurately described this approved transaction by stating the company acquiring a minority interest was Canadian rather than Russian.

    As it did in its 2009 Annual Report to Congress, CFIUS misreported the nature of the approved transaction (Case No-40) between ARMZ and Uranium One in its 2010 Annual Report to Congress.

    Liked by 2 people

  32. Donna in Oregon says:

    I’m not sure about all the CFIUS signatures. But here are some names that might be part of this:

    Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz or Stephen Chu
    Secretary of Commerce either John Bryson or Penny Pritzker
    US Trade Reps were Michael Froman and Ron Kirk
    Office of Science & Technology Policy John P. Holdren director

    Liked by 1 person

  33. Donna in Oregon says:

    Looking for a Russian connection?

    Sergey Kurzin, a Russian-born engineer who has publicly taken credit for arranging the meeting involving Clinton and Kazakhstan’s president, also acknowledged donating. The Toronto Globe and Mail reported in 2008 that Kurzin pledged $1 million at the gala. Kurzin also gave $50,000 to $100,000 directly to the Clinton Foundation.

    I have pages of shady Clinton Foundation going back to 2006……

    Liked by 1 person

  34. Donna in Oregon says:

    Don’t overlook the Panama Papers. This is involved in the Clinton Foundation too.

    Among the Sberbank subsidiaries that the Podesta Group also represents are the Cayman Islands-based Troika Dialog Group Limited, the Cyprus-based SBGB Cyprus Limited, and the Luxembourg-based SB International.
    As reported this week by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, a consortium of journalists exploring the Panama Papers leak, Sberbank and Troika Dialog are used by members of Mr. Putin’s inner circle to shift public funds into sometimes questionable private investments. In other words, this is top-level money laundering of a brazen kind.

    As the OCCRP stated plainly, “Some of these companies were initially connected to the Troika Dialog investment fund, which was controlled and run by Sberbank after the bank bought the Troika Dialog investment bank. Troika and Sberbank declined to comment.”

    Adding to shadiness of all this, the Podesta Group is playing along with the useful charade that Sberbank is simply a private financial institution, rather than the state-owned bank that it is, since that would require the lobbyists to register as agents of the Russian government under the Foreign Agent Registration Act.

    John and Tony Podesta aren’t fooling anyone with this ruse. They are lobbyists for Vladimir Putin’s personal bank of choice, an arm of his Kremlin and its intelligence services. Since the brothers Podesta are presumably destined for very high-level White House jobs next January if the Democrats triumph in November at the polls, their relationship with Sberbank is something they—and Hillary Clinton—need to explain to the public.

    Panama Papers Reveal Clinton’s Kremlin Connection

    John and Tony Podesta aren’t fooling anyone
    By John R. Schindler •

    Liked by 4 people

  35. Donna in Oregon says:

    This is the division of the Clinton Foundation that was for mining. The parts of the educational scams in Latin America are a whole different Bill and Hillary scheme. They did use education to rip off the American people too. But that’s another story for another day. It’s all related tho….

    The foundation’s Bogota-based firm, Fondo Acceso, was started in 2010 by Bill Clinton, Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim and mining magnate Frank Giustra, with seed funding of $20 million from the foundation’s Clinton-Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative and the SLIM Foundation, the Washington Free Beacon reports.

    Anything to hide here? Well, Fondo Acceso took down its website once the Beacon broke the story. And the venture wasn’t even registered as a private-equity fund in Colombia, thereby skirting government oversight. A good move for an investment firm linked to the US secretary of state.

    Ken Boehm, a watchdog with the National Legal and Policy Center, notes, “At the minimum, the Clinton Foundation should disclose every company that received investment funds from them, because the public is entitled to know whether those companies benefited from any State Department foreign-aid programs.”

    Not to mention the ethical murk of having two charities co-own an investment fund in a developing nation.
    from washington

    The inside story of how the Clintons built a $2 billion global empire
    By David A. Fahrenthold, Tom Hamburger and Rosalind S. Helderman June 2, 2015

    Also read:

    Also read:

    Liked by 2 people

  36. Minnie says:

    Interesting – Ned Ryun (CEO of American Majority) on Fox right now with Jesse Watters –

    Uranium Deal was approved by 9 agencies in an expedited fashion, started first week of August, 2010, and was approved October 22, 2010. When you’re dealing with real issues of national security, sometimes it takes up to 120 days, this was more like 75 days”

    Anyone else realize the short time period involved?

    Why, it’s almost as if they had an inside track to approval? /s

    Liked by 2 people

  37. Donna in Oregon says:

    Here is the insult with the injury.

    Russian State Nuclear Firm Fancies Itself Small US Business; Cries Hardship re US EPA Uranium Mining Cleanup Proposal
    May 2015
    Posted by miningawareness in Uncategorized

    Here’s what Russia is doing:

    Russia Strengthens Its Grip On Uranium Supplies to Fuel Its Arctic Conquest: Rosatom Acquires Uranium One Mines in Kazakhstan, Australia, & the US

    Floating nuclear power stations are planned to be used mainly in the Russian Arctic. Five of these will be used by Gazprom for offshore oil and gas field development and for operations on the Kola and Yamal peninsulas.[3] Other locations include Dudinka on the Taymyr Peninsula, Vilyuchinsk on the Kamchatka Peninsula and Pevek on the Chukchi Peninsula.[7] In 2007, Rosatom signed an agreement with the Sakha Republic to build a floating plant for its northern parts, using smaller ABV reactors.[3]” (References at link; bold added for emphasis)

    See also: “The first of the two reactors to Russia’s first floating nuclear power plant was lifted onboard on September 27th. The two reactors for Russia’s first floating nuclear power plant to be used in the Arctic are now installed“, by Thomas Nilsen, October 04, 2013, Barentsobserver

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s