Stunning Coverup Maneuver – Obama NSC Move All Intelligence Unmasking Material To Obama Library To Avoid Sunlight…

To understand the play at stake here, and the larger scheme to keep the Obama political surveillance from the sunlight of discovery, it is important to remember the only factually known illegal activity surrounding the entire Russian Election Conspiracy is:

  • A.) the illegal leaking of intelligence reports (Comey et al), or the weaponization of intelligence for political motives; and
  • B.) the illegal unmasking of names within U.S. intelligence reports by Obama White House officials (Susan Rice and Ben Rhodes), again for political motives.

The latest jaw dropping maneuver by the former Obama White House crew specifically targets how to cover-up the latter issue.

A FOIA request from Judicial Watch to the Obama NSC seeking information about the unmasking activities of National Security Advisor Susan Rice and the National Security Council receives a response that all documentation has been moved to the Obama Library.

The reason: All presidential library material is NOT subject to public scrutiny until FIVE YEARS after the administration ends.

(Via Judicial Watch) The NSC will not fulfill an April 4 Judicial Watch request for records regarding information relating to people “who were identified pursuant to intelligence collection activities.”

The agency also informed Judicial Watch that it would not turn over communications with any Intelligence Community member or agency concerning the alleged Russian involvement in the 2016 presidential election; the hacking of DNC computers; or the suspected communications between Russia and Trump campaign/transition officials. Specifically, the NSC told Judicial Watch:

“Documents from the Obama administration have been transferred to the Barack Obama Presidential Library. You may send your request to the Obama Library. However, you should be aware that under the Presidential Records Act, Presidential records remain closed to the public for five years after an administration has left office.” (link)

Calling it specifically what it is: this is nothing short of a strategy to hide discovery of the illegal political surveillance scheme carried out by the Obama intelligence community (Brennan, Clapper and Comey Inc.) during the 2016 presidential race.

In the matter of the first known illegal action, fired FBI Director James Comey is currently working his angles to hide his upper level FBI team’s involvement in the leaking of intelligence and FBI (counterintelligence) operations to the media. All of Comey’s current activity is clearly targeted toward accomplishing this goal.

In the matter of the second known illegal action, former Obama officials are clearly working to hide their use of the intelligence community to spy on political opposition. As we stated back in April the fingerprints of this action were clearly established.

Former National Security Adviser Susan Rice only needed to confirm one aspect of the intelligence unmasking story for all of the dots to connect. She made that confirmation within two minutes of her interview with MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell.

From the MSNBC transcript, emphasis mine:

Susan Rice @00:51 – …”Let me explain how this works. I was a National Security Adviser, my job is to protect the American people and the security of our country. That’s the same as the Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense and CIA Director.; and every morning, to enable us to do that, we receive – from the intelligence community – a compilation of intelligence reports that the IC, the intelligence community, has selected for uson a daily basis– to give us the best information as to what’s going on around the world.”

Note, right there. STOP. No need to go any further. There it is – Susan Rice is describing the Presidents’ Daily Briefing, aka the “PDB”. She continues:

“I received those reports, as did other officials, and there were occasions when I would receive a report in which, uh, a ‘U.S Person’ was referred to. Name, uh, not provided, just ‘U.S. Person’.

And sometimes in that context, in order to understand the importance in the report – and assess it’s significance, it was necessary to find out or request, who that U.S. official was.”

This is the important detail. Susan Rice was requesting unmasking of U.S. person’s names, which she moments later describes as “U.S. official[s]”, to understand the context and importance for the intelligence being given within the Presidents’ Daily Brief.

Under President Obama’s communication and intelligence directives, the Presidential Daily Briefing was widely shared with dozens of administration persons in various agencies.

From a Washington Post story explaining the PDB and Obama’s use therein. (again, emphasis mine):

(Washington Post) […] It’s the president’s book. And indeed, it is tailored to each president’s individual needs. CIA officers in 1961 designed what was initially known as the President’s Intelligence Checklist specifically for John F. Kennedy’s tastes, using punchy words and phrases while avoiding clunky bureaucratic language and annoying classification markings. That checklist evolved into the President’s Daily Brief in late 1964 , as the agency reformatted and retitled the book of secrets to appeal to Lyndon Johnson’s preferences. While the name has stuck, the content and format have continued to evolve. President Obama receives his in digital form and reads it on a tablet .

But while through most of its history the document has been marked “For the President’s Eyes Only,” the PDB has never gone to the president alone. The most restricted dissemination was in the early 1970s, when the book went only to President Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger, who was dual-hatted as national security adviser and secretary of state.

In other administrations, the circle of readers has also included the vice president, the secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, along with additional White House staffers. By 2013, Obama’s PDB was making its way to more than 30 recipients, including the president’s top strategic communications aide and speechwriter, and deputy secretaries of national security departments. (link)

The post article was written December 26th 2016, after the election – and was presumably written due to post-election media reports the intelligence community had concerns over sharing information with President-elect Trump; this was the preferred, and false, anti-Trump narrative for a few weeks. I digress.

The important aspect two fold: #1) the PDB is electronic viewable by POTUS Obama on his iPad; and #2) how many people were getting the PDB information 30+, against the backdrop of Rice’s admitted unmasking of names within the raw intelligence for PDB user comprehension.

There you can see that “more than 30 recipients” would be privy to the unmasked information within the PDB as an outcome of the protocols instituted by the White House and President Obama’s National Security Advising team.

From Rice’s MSNBC interview the departments of “State (John Kerry et al) and Defense (Ash Carter et al)”, along with CIA (Director John Brennan), NSA (Director Mike Rogers) and ODNI James Clapper, all participated.

As such, and as outlined by the Washington Post on distribution, deputies within Defense and State, along with “other national security departments” would have access to the unmasked PDB information.

Here’s where you realize within those “more than 30 recipients” you find people like Secretary Hillary Clinton, Undersecretary Patrick Kennedy and various high level officials in the Office of the Secretary and its Executive Secretariat (S/ES) past and present. This is also where the Deputy Secretaries of Defense like Dr. Evelyn Farkas come into play. All of these officials would be accessing, or at least have access to, the President’s Daily Brief, and the unmasked intelligence within it.

When you recognize how widely the Obama administration disseminated the PDB you begin to realize how easy it was for any foreign entity, including the Russians, to have access to the EXACT SAME daily intelligence brief as President Obama and his National Security Adviser Susan Rice.

An additional character within this wide-dissemination construct would be John Podesta.

Remember, after Hillary Clinton stepped down from Secretary of State, she inserted, with Obama’s approval, John Podesta within the White House Senior Advisory staff to keep a communications line open with direct information. (As pictured below) Podesta remained in that position throughout 2013, 2014 and into 2015.

President Barack Obama, with Secretary of State John Kerry, participates in a secure video teleconference with Embassy Baghdad and Consulates General Erbil and Basrah, at the U.S. Department of State in Washington, D.C., Oct. 24, 2014.

Having a known entity like John Podesta with access to the PDB and the unmasked intelligence therein, puts the appropriate highlight on the risk carried by Russian hacking into Podesta’s electronic communications, stored data and email correspondence.

Is it any surprise Russian, or any foreign intelligence group, would then be making attempts to enter the unsecured private email accounts of Secretary Hillary Clinton and her top level staff?

And John Podesta is only one of numerous people who would have access to this PDB information. All of which would potentially be at risk of being read daily by enterprising hackers, or various spies, who would glean a gobsmacking level of information by actually reading the same unmasked intelligence as the President of the United States.

Oh, the angles are almost limitless.

Not only would President Obama and his entire NSC team be gathering operational political intelligence on their political adversaries to include President-Elect Donald Trump and his transition team, but they would also be gathering intelligence and unmasking it on other U.S. Officials…..

…..That same unmasked and widespread surveillance, under the auspices of intelligence gathering, was then shared with dozens of administration officials -beyond the likes of the National Security Council, Asst. Defense Secretary Farkas and politicos like John Podesta- which means it was more than likely reviewed, via hacking etc., by our most critical national enemies.

Follow that trail to where it leads and you’ll likely discover the real story that encompasses the motive to create the ‘vast Russian conspiracy‘.

It only took Susan Rice two minutes on MSNBC to highlight the entire motive.

Another March 2nd MSNBC interview with Evelyn Farkas takes a new context:

“I was urging my former colleagues, and, and frankly speaking the people on the Hill [Democrat politicians], it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can – get as much intelligence as you can – before President Obama leaves the administration.”

Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama] people who left; so it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy, um, that the Trump folks – if they found out HOW we knew what we knew about their, the Trump staff, dealing with Russians – that they would try to compromise those sources and methods; meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.

So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia; so then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew that they were also trying to help get information to the Hill. … That’s why you had the leaking”.

[Link to Farkas MSNBC Interview and Transcript]

if they found out HOW we knew … that they would try to compromise those sources and methods; meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence “,

Indeed they would Dr. Farkas. Indeed they would.

And Post-election, and after people began asking questions about these “unmasking” revelations; and after the White House realized their initial cover story was only leading to more uncomfortable questions, the Obama White House shifted their approach:

(Via NBC) Obama administration officials were so concerned about what would happen to key classified documents related to the Russia probe once President Trump took office that they created a list of document serial numbers to give to senior members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, a former Obama official told NBC News.

The official said that after the list of documents related to the probe into Russian interference in the U.S. election was created in early January, he hand-carried it to the committee members. The numbers themselves were not classified, said the official.

The purpose, said the official, was to make it “harder to bury” the information, “to share it with those on the Hill who could lawfully see the documents,” and to make sure it could reside in an Intelligence committee safe, “not just at Langley [CIA hq].” (link)

There you see the deflection and cover story angle for the media. The reports themselves were classified intelligence; however, the numbers identifying the classified documents themselves were “not classified”. This provides the cover for all the Farkas-minded parties involved to say they were not actually spreading classified intelligence, they were just telling “people on the hill” the numerical identity of classified intelligence documents.

See how that works?

But that approach wasn’t going to work long-term, because pesky Devin Nunes (Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee)  began seeking the specific documents from the entire intelligence community, including the Obama NSC.   Remember, Nunes said repeatedly the Comey FBI was the organization refusing to comply with providing these documents; this was before Comey was fired.

As soon as Comey was fired, the Obama team’s ability to control the intelligence information was substantially lessened.  The risk gets larger without control.  As more of the remaining embeds of the Obama intel community were removed their cover-up strategy necessarily had to change.

Thus the latest response from those who were carrying out the illegal unmasking activity is to bury the information behind the protective walls of an Obama library:

“Documents from the Obama administration have been transferred to the Barack Obama Presidential Library. You may send your request to the Obama Library. However, you should be aware that under the Presidential Records Act, Presidential records remain closed to the public for five years after an administration has left office.”

.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in AG Jeff Sessions, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, CIA, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, FBI, Jeff Sessions, media bias, Notorious Liars, Obama Research/Discovery, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized, Valerie Jarrett, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

787 Responses to Stunning Coverup Maneuver – Obama NSC Move All Intelligence Unmasking Material To Obama Library To Avoid Sunlight…

  1. youme says:

    Report: NSC has computer logs of Susan Rice accessing intelligence on Trump associates
    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/report-nsc-has-computer-logs-of-susan-rice-accessing-intelligence-on-trump-associates/article/2619242

    I couldn’t find a follow up to this story. I do remember an article that stated someone on Trump’s NSC was gathering information on the unmasking and was told to shut it down.

    Liked by 1 person

    • youme says:

      Found it…told to shut it down

      “As Lake adds, the National Security Council’s senior director for intelligence, Ezra Cohen-Watnick, was conducting the review, according to two U.S. officials who spoke with Bloomberg View on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly. In February Cohen-Watnick discovered Rice’s multiple requests to unmask U.S. persons in intelligence reports that related to Trump transition activities. He brought this to the attention of the White House General Counsel’s office, who reviewed more of Rice’s requests and instructed him to end his own research into the unmasking policy.”

      https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-04-03/top-obama-adviser-sought-names-of-trump-associates-in-intel

      Liked by 3 people

      • youme says:

        Seems that Judicial Watch was lied to by the NSC. That information was still at the NSC in February, 2017

        Liked by 3 people

      • youme says:

        Seems Ezra is trying to do the right thing….

        Ezra Cohen-Watnick’s moment of prominence came in late March, when he was exposed as a channel for information used by the House intelligence committee chairman, Devin Nunes, another Flynn ally, to distract from an investigation into Russia’s connections with Trump affiliates. A key figure in that investigation is Flynn, who received tens of thousands of dollars for a speech in Moscow from RT, a news channel the CIA considers an adjunct of official Russian propaganda.

        Reportedly, Cohen-Watnick provided Nunes with documents purporting to show improper surveillance on Trump’s allies, an allegation Nunes made while obscuring that the narrative, politically convenient for the White House, emerged from the White House itself. Nunes later reluctantly recused himself when the revelation of White House involvement sparked a political outcry. Subsequently, both Democrats and Republicans who viewed the documents considered them anodyne, a far cry from Nunes and Trump’s portrayals.

        https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/apr/20/trump-cia-firing-intelligence-community-white-house

        Like

      • bigsy says:

        “end his own research’ ,could also mean that the White House General Counsel itself took over the investigation at that point.

        I.E, it was bumped upstairs.

        Like

      • Donna in Oregon says:

        Anonymous sources….

        Like

    • histbuff says:

      I wonder who told him to shut it down. Obama is no longer the President, so why can’t President Trump move the documents right back, or make copies of them, or reclassify them, or rescind or modify the 5 year limitation. It makes no sense to me because DJT has the power now, not Obama. He just has to choose to use it.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. stella says:

    Obama to Bush: I Can Release Your Records. Don’t Like It? Sue.

    http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2009/01/obama-bush-i-can-release-your-records-dont-it-sue/

    “[Obama]’s putting former presidents on notice that if you want to continue a claim of executive privilege that [Obama] doesn’t think is well-placed, you’re going to have to go to court,” says Anne Weismann, the chief counsel for Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW).

    During the campaign, Obama promised to “nullify attempts to make the timely release of presidential records more difficult.” (A transition spokesperson promised Mother Jones essentially the same thing when we asked a few weeks ago.) That was a reference to former president Bush’s infamous Executive Order 13233, which gave current and former presidents and vice presidents, along with their heirs, unprecedented authority to block the disclosure of White House records. But Obama’s taken his campaign promise a step further. While revoking 13233, Obama has also put forth a far stricter interpretation of executive privilege:

    [T]he Executive Order on Presidential Records brings those principles [of openness and transparency] to presidential records by giving the American people greater access to these historic documents. This order ends the practice of having others besides the President assert executive privilege for records after an administration ends. Now, only the President will have that power, limiting its potential for abuse. And the order also requires the Attorney General and the White House Counsel to review claims of executive privilege about covered records to make sure those claims are fully warranted by the Constitution.

    Liked by 5 people

  3. Rick says:

    All I have to say about this is trust me, is PDJT tried to pull a scam like this, they’d get ALL the unmasking material. Presidential Library??? Pure Bullshit!

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Not to worry. I’m sure the Russians have a copy they will share with President Trump.

    Liked by 4 people

  5. dbethd says:

    Exceptions to Restricted Access of Presidential Records:
    (3) the Presidential records of a former President shall be available to such former President or the former President’s designated representative.
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/44/2205

    Thoughts on reading this: If Obama has access to these records at any time(or one of his “representatives”), he could destroy them. Am I too far off base?

    Like

  6. stella says:

    FTA: The PRA also establishes procedures for Congress, courts, and subsequent administrations to obtain special access to records that remain closed to the public, following a 30‑day notice period to the former and current Presidents.
    Requires that Vice-Presidential records are to be treated in the same way as Presidential records.

    Executive Order 12667 – Issued by President Reagan in January 1989, this executive order established the procedures for NARA and former and incumbent Presidents to implement the PRA.
    Executive Order 13233 – This executive order, issued by President George W. Bush on November 1, 2001, supersedes the previous executive order. The Bush executive order also includes the documents of former Vice Presidents.
    Executive Order 13489 – Issued by President Barack Obama on January 21, 2009, restored the implementation of the PRA of 1978 as practiced under President Reagan’s Executive Order 12667 and revoked President Bush’s Executive Order 13233.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_Records_Act

    Liked by 3 people

  7. adjudicator1776 says:

    The NSC’s attempt to avoid discovery will fail and is laughable. It’s an obvious cover-up and an attempt to circumvent various laws and transparency. The deep state individuals who participated in the illegal spying, unmasking, and now leaking must be truly scared and desperate. It’s only a matter of time before a judge, who is disgusted by such gamesmanship, will order Obama and his corrupt henchmen to disclose the sought after documents. If they don’t, the judge can start jailing people for contempt.

    Liked by 4 people

    • ladypenquin says:

      I pray you’re right. Some days it just seems like we get bashed again and again, and the worst part of it is the idea that political corruption in this country will continue. Obama has so far gotten away with everything. I don’t expect to ever see him prosecuted, but all the people below him are guilty of deception and manipulation to achieve their fascist takeover of America. Democrats don’t recognize the Law anymore.

      That’s catastrophic for us if allowed to stand.

      Liked by 2 people

    • wyntre says:

      What’s the difference between NSC and NSA?

      Like

  8. ladypenquin says:

    Is this where we ask, “Mueller? Mueller? Mueller? Anyone seen Mueller?

    Liked by 7 people

  9. RunningOnEmpty says:

    So where exactly is this Obama Presidential Library? I just picked up the doggy doo doo from my back yard and need a place to deposit it.

    Liked by 4 people

  10. blognificentbee says:

    If Obama repealed Bush’s order, why can’t Trump repeal Obama’s executive order?

    This is just sickening. If part of an investigation by DOJ, any record of the people should be available. These are not Obama’s records, these are our records.

    Liked by 9 people

  11. eddie says:

    So much for transparency. This exposes just how corrupt our government is. They have a completely different set of rules. No wonder the establishment is fighting president Trump tooth and nail. Ignoring real crimes to go after a made up one, this is unbelievable. Our forefathers foresaw this, when they created the bill of rights and the constitution. But obviously, anything can be corrupted. They are afraid that the president will blow up everything by draining the swamp.Think about this, this is scary stuff. We have all known and joked about the government corruption. But I don’t think many of us realized the level of it. I am beginning to think that they (The deep state, the establishment, whatever you want to call it), is not going to stop until they take the president out. Then what, will we have a real revolt? Because that would really be over turning the will of over 60 million voters! Since Donald Trump entered the presidential race and started WINNING, so much of the corruption has been exposed. If they think that people are just going to accept them taking out a duly elected president, they have another thing coming.

    Like

  12. Ghostrider says:

    My bet is the records have been destroyed. Everything else is a ploy to prevent anyone from finding that out for a few years, or until any trails have gone nice and cold, or the Democrats are in charge again and can smother it all, forever.

    We don’t yet have any real grasp of the desperate depths of criminality plumbed by the Obama administration.

    Liked by 4 people

  13. Travis McGee says:

    Is it a law or a directive that could be changed with an EO?

    Like

    • The Demon Slick says:

      It’s a law, but it’s been modified by executive orders. I know, right?

      Like

      • cjzak says:

        Yeah, nothing’s a law anymore if someone in the Swamp wants it not to be in order to keep their agenda hot. Obama’s legacy and he did it alot. It has gotten beyond ridiculous that laws are made and then they are stretched, distorted, changed and out right ignored at any time. Not sure how that gets solved if the courts won’t inforce the laws as written.

        Like

  14. Lburg says:

    IIRC, there was a question posed to Comey during one of his testimonies about whether or not he recalled any instances of an ambassador requested unmasking. Comey’s answer was not that he could remember.

    Understanding that the photo probably isn’t a PDB, isn’t it interesting that two seats down from Comey is a woman who looks remarkably like Samantha Power? With all those ‘folkers’ representing their respective super secret squirrel organizations, I find it unusual that the ambassador to the u.n. is in attendance.

    Like

  15. StormyeyesC says:

    Not Subpoena Proof!!

    Liked by 2 people

    • Your Tour Guide says:

      All of this has a familiar odor. What’s Axelrod been up to lately?
      This is his type of handiwork. Am I over reaching on this one?

      Like

  16. David says:

    OBAMA’S LIBRARY JUST SHINED A LIGHT ON ALL HIS ALLEDGED CRIMINAL ACTS
    Obama Library hiding documents; is OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
    EXAMPLE: You hit another car and the driver’s finger had to be amputated; who was a surgeon. 10 million-dollar lawsuit filed against the driver of the Car. The Driver of the car formed a Corporation and transferred all his Assets into the Corporation; showing he has a zero-net worth. The Act of forming a Corporation is a Criminal Act…. just like Obama’s Pre-arranged acts of the hiding his alleged criminal acts through a Library. The Corporate Veil will be pierce and the Obama’s Library Shield will be pierced.

    The Obama Library is not a Rule of Law SHIELD; the Courts Will Demand Immediate Release when the Justice Department makes the Request through the Criminal Courts.

    No Criminal Act Documents can’t hide in the Obama Library; otherwise all Criminal Acts could be transferred to a Library until the Statue of Limitations are passed… All President would have a free pass for their Criminal Acts.

    OBAMA LIBRARY SHOWS/PROVES; ORDERS CAME FROM PRESIDENT OBAMA
    The Obama Library hiding of Documents clearly shows they are trying to hide what they did. Obama’s Library just “Shined” a light on the alleged Corruptions and the orders came from Obama…trying to hide what he did…points directly to him. (The Cover-up is always going to be a problem)

    These Alleged Corruptions should now be Easier to Proof and they came from the President …just need to start Grand Jury Investigations. IT IS SO EASY TO WIN THE WAR!

    Liked by 2 people

    • F104 says:

      I agree. It’s just another excuse to let the powers at be do whatever criminal stuff they want to do and get away with it. I am waiting for Trump to lock her up. We will see. I am waiting for the handcuffs to come out on people. So far, what we have is Reality Winner! Sessions is hard at work isn’t he? Why is everyone so busy making excuses? Instead of excuses, we need to start questioning.

      Like

      • David says:

        President Trump has to battle the Media, Left, Globalist, Elitist, Some Republicans and the DEEP STATE…and he is really all by himself. Try to remember he has only been in office for 150 days. President Trump can’t let on what his plan is; never let the enemy know what you are about to do.

        If you look at President Trumps 4-dimensional Chess Moves…they are all going in the right direction.

        For Example; President Trump did not fire James Comey on January 20…this chess move let James Comey destroy himself in front of the World. Even the Leakers shows the true Extent of the Deep State and Corruption, which is dangerous to the Constitution and the United States. This was all part of his plan to justify and confirm 100% why he has to Prosecute Hillary’s Emails, Clinton Foundation etc. and all the Corruption.

        When President Trump stated he is not going to Prosecute Hillary’s Emails; he knew the Attorney General was going to do this automatically…he will than explain he did not know how deep the corruption was regarding her Emails.

        Illegal Immigration; President Trump is only going after the Criminal Illegal Immigrants…NO…he is just saying that at this Moment…eventually he will deport 11 million illegal immigrants by ICE and E-Verify.

        President Trump has to show why he is doing what he is doing…he has to educate the people…and be tactical.

        Again, President Trump has to Prosecute the Corruption and Eliminate it forever; or like a cancer it might take him down and will take the United States sometime in the future.

        Like

    • Southernylady says:

      Hey!!! David can I email this comment to Sessions-I have emailed him twice regarding Mule-ller and I have emailed Rosenstein but have not received a response. Not your name just discussion part—it is so on course

      Like

  17. rebel53blog says:

    Time for the Obama Treason Trials, Lock Them Up

    Liked by 2 people

  18. 4sure says:

    “IT IS SO EASY TO WIN THE WAR!”

    Not if you are unwilling to take on the enema.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. blognificentbee says:

    Good news!! While Judicial Watch may not be able to get their hands on the records, according to this article, Congress, President Trump can! Also, the records can be released for a subpoena. This is not a regularly visited site for me, but it seems to be legit.

    http://bigleaguepolitics.com/confirmed-trump-can-get-unmasking-records-obama-library/

    Liked by 1 person

  20. indiana08 says:

    There is a chapter in one of Pres. Trump’s books (I forgot which one) about revenge. It was written after the Rosie O’Donnell feud started because that was mentioned. Pres.Trump won’t let what Obama and the democrats did to him, his family and us slide. Obama can hide all the records he wants but Pres. Trump probably has some good records of his own. He keeps everything. No telling what was found in Comey’s office when they cleaned it out after firing Comey. Pres. Trump and AG Sessions will strike when Obama and his cohorts least expect it. He’s probably waiting to get his FBI director in place first. Obama is going to pay for what he did to this country. Pres. Trump hasn’t forgotten how nasty Obama was to him long before Pres.Trump decided to run for POTUS.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Minnie says:

      Agreed, hence the recitation of “The Snake” 👍

      Like

      • I’m not sure you all are correct with your notion that POTUS will ever “strike.” As I have just begun to realize, the positive businessman qualities we see in him concentrate on”

        One. The Positive. Look for the Good and the Possible. don’t worry about the rest.

        Two. Forward! Forget the past. That’s over. Push forward to MAGA!

        Three. Work Ethic. Note how POTUS and his Cabinet are all doing the same thing – they are putting their heads down and PUSHING forward.

        Four. No time, no interest in the past. Let bygones be bygones. Get good, positive work done.

        Overall attitude of POTUS and other businessmen: “I don’t have any enemies, just potential customers. Now, of course I’ll never deal again with anyone who has betrayed me, but dreams of punishment are a waste of time.”

        Like

        • P.S. Pres. Trump wasn’t the one who came up with “Drain the Swamp.” Remember the first few rallies when he tried it out. He asked the crowd whether they liked it and pretty much said he didn’t like it. Personally, I didn’t see a big positive crowd reaction either. The preferred the positive “U.S.A.!” Also, “Lock Her Up!” seemed to be pretty genuine.

          That phrase could have come from newer supporters (not Corey, Hope, etc., etc.) who had been super hard-core conservatives. I’ve noticed that SHC conservatives are unforgiving and never forget a past error or sin. I just don’t think the business world operates like that! [I covered businesses, large and small, for ten+ years.]

          Like

        • Southernylady says:

          Of course you have the turn the other cheek method—-but we have to stop this evil or we will go down with our country—correction not punishment.

          Like

  21. kp3ace says:

    Wouldn’t this, in itself be considered obstruction of justice? And was Obamas I-pad secure? Could someone hack the information from there?

    Like

  22. stillers213 says:

    Just when you thought Dims could not be any more vile, sneaky, immoral, or despicable, the next day arrives.

    Liked by 1 person

  23. CountryclassVulgarian says:

    I’m sure John Mc Traitor and Ms Grahamnasty is on this. I’m sure any day now they are going to going on Chris Wallace and condemn it… I’m sure, I can just feel it….

    Like

  24. The temporary library is north of Chicago airport in a place called “village of Hoffman estates. The mayor is a 4 term mayor, very corrupt.

    Read this letter to the mayor about his corrupt practices.

    http://www.bollyn.com/letter-to-mayor-william-d-mcleod-from-illinois-committee-for-public-and-private-accountability/

    Like

  25. Wink says:

    It’s time to pick up the phone and give Julian Assange a call. ” Hey, Julian, we have a little job for you. Know anyone who has access to Obama’s presidential library?”

    Like

  26. stylin19 says:

    With those records sealed for 5 years, Mueller can’t do his job.
    His investigation should be terminated.

    Like

    • Wink says:

      My question is: what constitutes “public”. Are these records sealed only to non-government agencies? So very confusing, but then, I’m not a lawyer. (thank goodness!)

      Like

  27. More serious corruption in “villages of Hoffman estates” where Obamas temporary library is being hidden.

    http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2006/08/bollyn-and-hoffman-estates-thugs/

    Like

  28. jstanley01 says:

    Somebody can correct me if I’m wrong, but surely the records are not protected from prosecutorial discovery. Which gets to the whole problem. Uncovering crime is not supposed to be the job of private litigators like Judicial Watch, it is supposed to be the job of the Justice Department.

    But at Justice we have an AG who has recused himself, rendering him totally ineffective. Sessions either needs to un-recuse himself — a political impossibility — or resign in favor of someone who is not just willing to follow the evidence, but who is able to do what Sessions cannot do.

    Like

    • jstanley01 says:

      Sessions recuses himself, Nunes steps aside, RINOs trumpet the “meh Russia” meme till the cows come home. Which brings up the bigger question, why does our side keep bowing to pressure from the swamp creatures? Did we win the election or not? Get some balls, people. See your boss, President Donald J. Trump, for how.

      Like

    • Wink says:

      I was wondering about the same thing, The word “public” might just mean private investigators, and not gov’t agencies.

      Like

      • jstanley01 says:

        It is my understanding that groups like Judicial Watch pursue government misconduct as civil matters. Criminal cases are an entirely different bailiwick, and are pursued exclusively by U.S. Attorneys employed by the Justice Department, who enjoy far more power for discovery.

        Like

    • Minnie says:

      We don’t know that he hasn’t.

      AG Sessions only recused himself from all things Russian.

      Patience and trust 👍

      Like

  29. Matamoros says:

    Surely all that would have to be done was the DOJ, FBI, or Trump to order it opened (or moved back to the NSC) until all investigations and subsequent prosecutions are completed.

    Like

  30. Minnie says:

    As we continue to speculate, simmer in anger and angst:

    The Snake 🐍

    COVFEFE (in the end WE win) 🚂

    Play ball! ⚾️

    Remember?

    I do and I’m ready!

    Liked by 1 person

  31. Bruce says:

    Imagine that, trying to hide records. Big surprise. We have no idea what info has been collected already and we have no idea what TWEEDY BIRD is singing at this moment to federal investigators and even possible grand juries. All this stuff is the sound of rats beginning to squeal from pain of being cornered.

    As of last week, I don’t talk to democrats anymore. What’s the sense of wasting time. Who cares what they think or say. Just keep your hands where I can see them.

    Like

  32. psadie says:

    When 5 years is up and the documents “demanded” they will unfortunately have been forever LOST during the move to the non-existent “library.” Sigh…

    Liked by 1 person

  33. scotl70 says:

    Nothing has been moved to the non-existent “library”. Any incriminating evidence has already been destroyed. That’s what democrats do.
    The “library” is just a cover story.

    Like

    • Donna in Oregon says:

      President Trump had a visit from Adm. Mike Rogers in Nov 2016. If Brennan, Comey, or Clapper could have lied about President Trump’s alleged Russian collusion /obstruction they would have.

      The NSA will compile the evidence President Trump requests. They are the scribes for justice IMHO.

      Judicial Watch does very important work; however, JW is not going to get evidence the Trump admin is using.

      As far as the Obama Library……it was probably like Enron and the IRS scandal. The Obama library was scrubbed clean before the moving trucks showed up.

      Like

  34. SR says:

    Who decides what would go or not go in presidential library?

    Like

  35. quintrillion says:

    Good News. No library built. All last regime records are at national archives and ARE available to PDJT and to Congress:
    http://bigleaguepolitics.com/confirmed-trump-can-get-unmasking-records-obama-library/

    Sorry, if already posted.

    Liked by 1 person

    • David says:

      Excellent! More Great News!

      Like

    • Mr Biswas says:

      Actually, the article at the link does not settle the question of who has the documents and where are they presently located. It only states that the National Archivist retains “custody” of the documents, which could mean LEGAL custody but NOT PHYSICAL custody. Legal custody, in this context, means that the government retains ownership of the documents and that responsibility for the appropriate supervision of them rests with the Archivist. But that does not necessarily mean the original documents are physically stored in the National Archives. The documents could be physically in the possession of the staff Obama has assembled to organize the funding and building of his monument. In fact, that’s the kind of arrangement that’s been made with other presidential libraries, which serve as the depositories for original documents. The strange wrinkle here, however, is that Obama was said by the Chicago Tribune to have agreed to take only digital copies of his presidential paper, not the originals. Doing that would allow the library to avoid supervision by the National Archives with respect to certain rules that regulate the design and operation of any presidential library that receives government funding. In turn, Obama had to agree to forego any funding for his library from the Archives. So, the question of who has physical possession of the original documents remains unanswered. if it is revealed that the National Archives is now committed to help fund Obama’s library, contrary to what Obama originally promised, then you’ll have the answer: Obama has the documents. And I would guess that a mysterious fire will soon break out in whatever secret warehouse he is using to hide them away.

      Like

  36. Donna in Oregon says:

    Forensic evidence on the Obama White House and Admin. should have been preserved by the NSA. They spy on everyone. Copiers, scanners, phones, thumb drives, hard drives, lap tops, security cameras, etc..

    Obama and his admin utilized NSA services. That is documented too. Anything the Obama admin. gathered to use on members of Congress, SCOTUS, judges etc. is available to President Trump. If Obama was emailing Hillary Clinton on her special server, the NSA would pick that up,

    Why would the NSA destroy any evidence that would leave them holding the hot potato? They would not . Important for the NSA to show that the information was requested. Who, what, where and the why to be determined. There is no way the Obama admin could verify that those records were destroyed. The NSA would protect itself. .

    Like

  37. Don’t count on the GOP Rhino congress to do anything about it.

    Liked by 1 person

  38. TwoLaine says:

    Tom Fitton will be on “Hannity” on the Fox News Channel in the 10 pm ET hour tonight, June 20, 2017, to discuss Judicial Watch’s letter, which demands the FBI recover records unlawfully removed by former FBI Director James Comey, as well as materials regarding the unmasking by Obama National Security Advisor Susan Rice of “U.S. citizens associated with the Trump presidential campaign or transition team” that were removed to the Obama Library.

    Also, Tom will be on “Fox and Friends” on the Fox News Channel in the 6 am ET hour tomorrow, Wednesday, June 21, 2017, to discuss this very important issue.

    Like

  39. Pingback: Unmasking Documents Hidden Away In Obama’s Presidential Library – IOTW Report

  40. Mike diamond says:

    Comey hid the documents ! Maybe!?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s