BIG UPDATES – Farkas Fallout Leads To Media Cover Story While Nunes “Surveillance” Angle Grows…

SIP SLOWLY – We’ve been waiting patiently to see how the media would obfuscate the Evelyn Farkas accidental revelations about Obama administration current and former officials trying to leak intelligence information. An NBC report provides the answer:

(Via NBC) Obama administration officials were so concerned about what would happen to key classified documents related to the Russia probe once President Trump took office that they created a list of document serial numbers to give to senior members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, a former Obama official told NBC News.

The official said that after the list of documents related to the probe into Russian interference in the U.S. election was created in early January, he hand-carried it to the committee members. The numbers themselves were not classified, said the official.

The purpose, said the official, was to make it “harder to bury” the information, “to share it with those on the Hill who could lawfully see the documents,” and to make sure it could reside in an Intelligence committee safe, “not just at Langley [CIA hq].” (link)

There you see the deflection and cover story angle for the media. The reports themselves were classified intelligence; however, the numbers identifying the classified documents themselves were “not classified”. This provides the cover for all the Farkas-minded parties involved to say they were not actually spreading classified intelligence, they were just spreading the numerical identity of classified intelligence documents.

See how that works?

Will the public accept that excuse and explanation?  We’ll have to wait and see; but that’s the angle the left-wing ideologues in the media are using.

However, that said, Fox News is now reporting a rather startling set of facts surrounding Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes information regarding the Obama administration.

In a Fox News report from Adam Housley –Video HERE– people within the intelligence community are providing more details on the political weaponization of the intelligence community and their efforts of surveillance on President-Elect Trump’s transition team.

Key Highlights to the information given to Chairman Devin Nunes (per Fox):

♦  1. The intelligence surveillance, that led to the unmasking reports now being reviewed by ranking member Adam Schiff, started well before Donald Trump was the Republican presidential nominee.

♦  2. The Black Hat who did the unmasking is very high up in the intelligence world and is not in the FBI. Putting that aspect into prior information leads to a higher probability the individual was Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper.

♦  3. The two people reported yesterday in the New York Times report, by reporter Maggie Haberman, were not Nunes sources. Ezra Cohen-Watnick, the senior director for intelligence at the National Security Council, and Michael Ellis, a lawyer who works on national security issues at the White House Counsel’s Office, only helped Nunes navigate the intelligence. They were not the source.

That Cohen-Watnick and Michael Ellis were not the sources, leads further credence to the belief that their names were seeded to Katie Walsh as a canary operation to identify the White House leaker.

♦  4. Chairman Nunes was told about the unmasking of President-elect Trump’s team back in January BEFORE Trump’s tweet about Obama’s spying operation.

♦  5. In order for Nunes to see the intelligence reports and not compromise his source it took Nunes time to coordinate how to review the intelligence reports. He could not go to the source intel SCIF without compromising his source. Nunes chose the Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB) SCIF on the White House grounds in order to protect his source. Nunes chose the White House because it was the only other location he and the facilitators could use for viewing without outing the source.

If you’ve been following along, and you add in this significant pixel to the picture, you can clearly see who becomes the most likely source. [*Hint* rhymes with “Dodgers“] A frustrated White Hat; a person who just doesn’t like politicians, that doesn’t surprise CTH readers.

♦  6. Nothing Chairman Nunes has highlighted, and nothing the White House is challenging ranking member Adam Schiff and Senator Mark Warner to review, has anything to do with Russia.

WATCH ViDEO REPORT HERE

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Cyber Security, Deep State, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, media bias, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Spying, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

804 Responses to BIG UPDATES – Farkas Fallout Leads To Media Cover Story While Nunes “Surveillance” Angle Grows…

  1. Howie says:

    Easy now…don’t touch the drag, do not touch the rod.. A world record is hooked up.

    Liked by 28 people

  2. Natasha says:

    Guys has anyone seen this?

    (Mary Anne Marsh, a democrat, reveals that the Obama admin had been investigating Trump since the spring of 2015) on Judge Jeanine…… She claims that Trump was being surivelled since summer of 2015 claiming ‘Russia’ excuse. It might explain how Evelyn Farkas knew about and continued being fed information during the campaign to benefit Killary.

    Liked by 17 people

    • billytrade says:

      Did Mary Anne Marsh just stick the rare “Triple Farkas”?

      Liked by 40 people

    • Notmeagain says:

      I did see it. Marsh seemed sure of her assertions although she was fighting Judge Jeanine on revealing how she knew.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Daniel says:

      Hillary was being given this intelligence and she shared it with her supporters. That simple. This went from the White House to Hillary.

      Liked by 18 people

      • Anita says:

        Yeah, because Farkas went to work for the Hillary campaign. Puts clarity to the ” if they found out how WE knew what we knew” comment.

        Liked by 9 people

        • Joe Knuckles says:

          I know how they knew. Hillary and her people had a freaking security clearance and the documents were shared throughout the IC community. That’s why they knew they would lose access if we found out how they knew what they knew. Now we know how they knew what they knew so we also know they won’t be allowed to know anymore new stuff.

          Liked by 13 people

          • Daniel says:

            She was not a government employee at the time. She was not entitled to see or access classified information. So the reality is she was continuing to abuse classified information even while she was under fire for abusing classified information by FBI and congressional hearings.

            Liked by 10 people

          • justfactsplz says:

            That’s how they knew alright. Has President Trump changed that order Obummer had to share intel information with 16 or was it 17 other intel agencies that made it easier for them to share their evil deeds? Some heads need to roll over this. Until they do I suspect the surveillance will continue. They will just cover their tracks better so they can keep doing it. All of leakers need to be outed and prosecuted.

            Liked by 2 people

            • Sassy says:

              Consider how ridiculous it gets: http://www.recorder.com/Trump-s-approach-to-intel-agencies-shows-anxiety-distrust-9030348

              “Officials [that’s TRUMP officials] have expressed an interest in having more raw intelligence sent to the president for his daily briefings instead of an analysis of information compiled by the agencies, according to current and former U.S. officials. The change would have given his White House advisers more control about the assessments given to him and sidelined some of the conclusions made by intelligence professionals.

              One official said the focus on accessing more raw intelligence appeared to be more of a priority under the short tenure of Michael Flynn, who was ousted as national security adviser after less than one month on the job. …”

              So, you see, the problem is that TRUMP’S “officials” seem to be interested in having more “raw intelligence,” and the evil Flynn was behind that scheme. NOWHERE in the story do they mention that Obama’s orders changed right before he left office to allow more “raw intelligence” to be spread far and wide across the government, at as “low” a level of clearance as possible. Nowhere do they answer the question whether this old order of Obama’s has been rescinded. Is the “interest” in raw intelligence, allegedly by Flynn and other officials, simply an interest in perhaps NOT changing the Obama order, so the media will now try to hang that decision on Trump, too? Note that Flynn’s and Trump’s interest in raw intelligence doesn’t include spreading it to anybody and everybody but just to Trump and his advisors. They’re upset about this but apparently not interested in what Farkas has documented and what Obama ordered.

              Liked by 1 person

              • justfactsplz says:

                The Obama order needs to be changed yesterday. I wonder if President Trump is getting all of the intelligence or if he is getting spoon fed what the agencies want him to know. The Deep State would go that far to protect their interests.

                Like

      • woohoowee says:

        Senator Hatch agrees w/you:

        Hatch said he was not completely surprised by Obama’s use of official apparatus to track political opponents.

        “I suspected that they were going to do that anyways,” he said.

        The senator also said that he suspects information gathered by the Obama administration’s surveillance of the Trump camp made its way to Obama’s anointed heir Hillary Clinton and her presidential campaign.

        “Yeah, I got a lot of suspicions, but I have no idea, so I am not going to speculate.”

        http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/02/sen-orrin-hatch-shocked-obama-team-conducted-surveillance-of-trump-campaign-transition/

        Liked by 5 people

        • WSB says:

          “Yeah, I got a lot of suspicions, but I have no idea, so I am not going to speculate.”

          Right, Senator Hatch. Right.

          Liked by 6 people

          • George Hicks says:

            No, no, it’s riiiiiiiight! LOL

            Liked by 2 people

          • bofh says:

            “Yeah, I got a lot of suspicions, but I have no idea, so I am not going to speculate.”

            That’s world-class parseltongue, that is. What a gutless puke. What he “doesn’t have” is a clue. Or cojones.

            Liked by 3 people

          • Bill Wright says:

            Don’t you think Trump knew that Obama and Hillary were surveilling him. For one thing he had General Flynn (former DIA) on his staff. Of course he knew. One of the first things campaign consultants do is try to get intelligence on the other side.

            What Trump may not have have suspected is that the surveillance would continue after he won. Everyone lets their guard down after the win–big mistake. The surveillance never ends, even when you are on Capitol Hill.

            You can hire campaign snoops who have social and cyber hacking skills. These folks are hired by word of mouth.

            One of the trickiest parts of being a consultant is convincing your candidate and their staff about how severe the snooping will be. The usually don’t believe you, and they constantly make mistakes. They are not used to moving in that world.

            Liked by 1 person

            • WSB says:

              According to the Arpaio tapes, Trump knew in 2013 or as far back as during the Bush years, when he considered running.

              Liked by 2 people

            • Sassy says:

              All of this tells us that there’s a partisan mole (or moles) in the NSA, among those who monitor the conversations, looking for anything to use against candidate Trump and now-president Trump. WHO is that person, to whom does that person report, and who ordered that person to do it? Someone had to, otherwise none of the suspected “high-ranking officials” who unmasked the names would even know what to unmask, would they? These high-ranking officials were too “important” to sift through all that stuff themselves. Who would have the time? Only those paid to do it. Somebody had to order it done. Somebody did it, using a computer program maybe, looking for the names among all the data in the database. How else could it be done, logistically speaking?

              Like

      • Robbie Mook already said the Campaign was given updates on Trump investigation.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Phil aka Felipe says:

        Yep. One of the reasons they were so smug and presumptuous about Hillary winning.

        Liked by 3 people

    • deplorabledooku says:

      I thought the hands-on favorite at that time was Jeb. Makes me wonder what revisionist history is being cooked up by the Dims.

      Liked by 2 people

    • mopar2016 says:

      Finally feeling the full force of the Farkas fracas fallout.
      Fascinating!

      Liked by 13 people

    • mike says:

      I still want to know whose asset was “Bill from White Plains”.

      Like

    • ronheinzkaboot says:

      I saw this when it first aired and remember how she pushed back when the Judge tried to correct her on the date. Put this together with Farkas and Comey testifying that he started his counter-intel investigation in July and DID NOT quarterly report to the Go8 on this investigation. So if it started even early and he didn’t file a quarterly report to congress until January. That’s really odd.
      So Comey only shared his counter intel reporting with Obama and Marsh and Farkas, members of the Clinton Campaign.

      Still not one shred of evidence Russia hacked the DNC or Podestra but we do have evidence that the NSA and CIA CCI was weaponized to meddle in our election and take out any candidate that was not part of the Uniparty for the future Union of the Americas.
      We have evidence that there was a concerted effort by the prior administration to spy on the opposition party, disseminate it the DNC and selectively disseminate it the press agents, owned by the Clinton donors, to smear the opposition candidate.

      Every government official, congressman, senator and press person that says we should be focusing on Russia, I know is full of bs and towing the line. (Rubio came out this week and said he was hacked by Russia–you have no chance in 2020 unless your our only choice)

      The CIA and NSA are in a fight for their lives to save their spying apparatus so they have to help cover the asses of Obama, press, Clinton and congress. And they have all the info on all those people so they better tow the line too.
      This is not about protecting our elections, or protecting Obama, this is about protecting the spying apparats of CIA and NSA from the public demanding they by curtailed or disassembled.

      Liked by 6 people

      • Sam Houston says:

        The frustration is that the American people do not understand anything about computers. Rubio’s stupid statement is a joke. We not only have the Wikileaks data dumps proving our own people can mask their ID when hacking to make it appear to be a different country of origin, but if I’m using TOR and attempt to “hack” into Rubio’s crap I can pick Russia as my IP. Errrr…. MUH Russia…

        Liked by 2 people

      • RuskiBot says:

        Simplified message: the Russians did not interfere with the US elections, the US Gov did.

        Liked by 7 people

        • Which is a law enforcement issue, not a national security issue.

          Liked by 2 people

          • Maquis says:

            That’s debatable.

            Our National Security depends on digging out the Deep State Shadow Government.

            But we should prosecute their hinies too!

            Those that aren’t, um, disappeared.

            I mean seriously, if you ever get your hands on the assassin that took out that young DNC staffer, are you going to build a case on him? Or maybe better, custom fit some cement shoes?

            We are dealing with dangerous people, not just corporate drones.

            Liked by 2 people

    • Sam Houston says:

      That’s hilarious. And yet we went through ALL of 2015 and ALL of 2016 and NOT A DAMN THING was ever actually found or we ALL know that crap would’ve leaked like a skiv during the election to bury him. Meanwhile HRC was selling SAP’s, children, organs, weapons and drugs, all while toppling nations and getting 4 Americans killed in Benghazi… Glad we have our priorities straight BHO!

      **Dream world scenario: Make HRC and BHO share a jail cell. 🙂 I would so sign up for the Bravo reality show!

      Liked by 4 people

    • Kintbury says:

      One thing I have learned in my years in this country, is how Democrats operate. If they had anything on Trump, they would have played their hand when it was too late to replace him on the ballot and he would have been arrested. They have nothing.

      Liked by 2 people

  3. fleporeblog says:

    I left off last night wondering what would Barry do. He decides after hearing about the revelations made today by Fox News and Sean Spicer consistently speaking about Evelyn Farcas that it was time to call John Clapper. He was begging Clapper to take the fall for all of it. He promised Clapper that as soon as HRC is elected in 2020, the first thing she will do after the inauguration ceremony is to pardon him and honor him as a hero of the Republic. Clapper pauses for a minute and tells Barry to go fu….k himself. Barry begins to scream and cry that Allah has forsaken him. Clapper immediately remembers that Trump is the President and the call was being tapped by him and the NSA. He decides that it is time for a bubble bath. He decides to bring his toy boats in the water with him. I will destroy Admiral Rogers and his damn Navy once and for all.

    Barry is decides to call his Muslim Brother John Brennan. Even though the day before Brennan was considering suicide because Mohammed has not answered his prayers over the past month. John answers the phone and is in a better mood. Barry is surprised because he was ready to go off to his 72 virgins the day before. Brennan says that Allah finally appeared to him in his sleep. He said that Allah has forgiven him since it has now become apparent that Barry was an incompetent leader. Allah assured Brennan that from this day forward, all of his anger will be aimed at Barry. Allah finishes the conversation by saying that Barry has lost his right to 72 virgin men but will instead be given 72 male Lions instead. Brennan thanks Barry for the call and wishes him peace and prosperity with his Lions.

    Barry decides to put all his cocaine on his table (think Scarface seen with Al Pacino) and begins to snort his white mountain down to a small hill. He know feels the courage to call HRC. HRC answers the phone screaming. Not at Barry but at Bill for sneaking in the energizer bunny after she told him the day before that she would kill her. With one hand on her phone she decides to get the shotgun to kill Bill and the bunny. Multiple shots are fired and HRC screams that she missed her targets because her shaking from Parkinson’s is at its worse. Barry asks her if she got rid of Evelyn. HRC says that Evelyn has disappeared and has lawyered up. They have her in a safe house with Anthony Weiner. They are both in their glories since they were able to keep their cell phones so that they could send naked pictures to each other since they are in separate rooms. HRC tells Barry her shakes have subsided so she is going to let him go so that she can load the gun and kill Bill and the Bunny once and for all.

    Liked by 29 people

  4. truthandjustice says:

    In addition – there’s “Five Eyes” agreement:

    “Few people outside of the U.S. intelligence community and congressional intelligence committees are aware of a post-World War II intel-sharing agreement between the United States and four other nations.

    Known as “Five Eyes,” intelligence services from the U.S., Canada, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, and Australia are bound by what is formally known as the UKUSA Agreement outlining joint cooperation in the gathering, processing and sharing of signals, military, and human intelligence (SIGINT, MILINT and HUMINT).

    In recent years, reports based on leaked secret documents indicate that, in order to get around each country’s strict rule against domestic spying, the various intelligence services from each of the five countries spy on citizens of all the other countries

    ..did President Obama utilize the unique Five Eyes agreement to bypass U.S. intelligence agencies to illicitly gather information on then-GOP presidential nominee Donald J. Trump’s campaign? Judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano of Fox News seems to think so.

    ..Napolitano,.. said three sources have told Fox News that Obama sought the GCHQ’s assistance in transcribing intercepted conversations involving Trump, so there wouldn’t be a ‘paper trail’ leading back to him.

    http://www.newstarget.com/2017-03-14-did-obama-use-the-five-eyes-intelligence-agreement-to-get-britain-to-spy-on-trump.html

    Liked by 15 people

    • fedback says:

      GCHQ Director resigned three days after Trump inauguration. Less than two years on the job. 51 years old.
      Former GCHQ Director resigned after Snowden revelations.
      See the pattern

      Liked by 18 people

    • 3x1 says:

      If Five Eyes (one or more of our “friends”) were used to spy for one political party (D) against another (R) they are every bit as a threat as our enemies and need cast out. Now. Not just fire some fall guy. Kicked O-U-T.

      None of the four still have a death penalty, which is entirely apropos for sedition, so cessation of relations is the next best thing.

      100% pull out diplomats remove all connections serious. They tried to overthrow our legally elected government serious. Why aren’t we at war with them serious.

      Liked by 2 people

  5. Beryl Bomb says:

    This is all great. The fireworks will start when the surveillance of Bernie Sanders is revealed and every Treeper can take a step backward, keep their powder dry, and let the SJWs and Snowflakes go ape-s#!+ on the black hats.
    借刀殺人/借刀杀人 (Kill With A Borrowed Sword)

    Liked by 14 people

  6. mikebrezzze says:

    Once spying by obama is verified, all is forgotten about Hillary, Clinton foundation and Bill Clinton, they walk away Scott free with their $1.5B they transferred to Quatar

    Liked by 2 people

    • jakeandcrew says:

      Makes you wonder if the Clintons may have had a hand in the “outing” of the info. Farkas is “with her”. So is Mika.

      Liked by 3 people

      • mikebrezzze says:

        The Clintons are shrewd evil incarnations of lucifer himself

        Liked by 7 people

      • wheatietoo says:

        No, Farkas is the weak link that ties the Obama WH to Clinton…so far.

        Liked by 4 people

        • John Galt says:

          Farkas would have already had a bench press accident if she had anything on the upper echelon.

          Liked by 1 person

          • wheatietoo says:

            But Farkas is a ‘true believer’…so I doubt she was seen as a threat for any leakage.

            Until now.

            Farkas probably still doesn’t even realize what she ‘knows’.

            Liked by 8 people

            • John Galt says:

              My theory: They selected and hired true believer moon bats, provided access and the rest followed naturally. The moon bats were trained in the handling of classified information and signed forms acknowledging their solemn duty of confidentiality. The upper echelon will be suitably shocked and appalled.

              If I fill my trashcan with salmon and put it outside in the summer, a bear will arrive and scatter my trash all over the street. Yet the bear and I had no expressed agreement to litter the street. Same story with Obozo and his moon bats.

              Liked by 16 people

              • wheatietoo says:

                I agree.
                But I think that it was upper echelon that came up with the whole ‘Russians’ story…as a cover story for the illegal snooping.

                The true believers were not aware that they were being ‘played’ by the upper echelon.

                The true believers were thereby pumped full of righteous fervor against that ‘evil’ Trump guy.

                Farkas was a perfect pawn because she was supposedly an ‘expert on Russia’…with credibility on the subject that the other pawns would accept.

                Liked by 7 people

                • WSB says:

                  Remember when Jeff Session said he had no idea why Ambassador Kissass had been scheduled for a meeting in his office?

                  Scheduled by the Obama Administration. I think that is kind of key. The Ambassador was in on it? Or just a dopey pawn?

                  Liked by 3 people

              • justfactsplz says:

                I have a resident black bear that I once met up close and personal. We have no agreement either. I don’t leave my garbage out since the first time when I moved here and he got into it. In retaliation he gets other people’s garbage and strings it through my yard. There is not doubt in my mind that he is a liberal bear and doesn’t like my Trump yard sign.

                Liked by 3 people

            • JMC says:

              Farkas left a secure job with Obama’s DoD, on Oct 31st 2015 as she claims. Obviously she did that to hitch her star to the Hillary campaign and rise high. She got pretty far up. She was Hillary’s campaign foreign affairs advisor, or one of them. She was very invested. She was also very invested in preventing Trump from winning. And so she was quite willing to be a part of a surveillance conspiracy. Its activities continued during and after the election. I’m sure Evelyn’s zeal was redoubled when Trump said in a debate that Hillary should be in jail.

              Liked by 2 people

              • WSB says:

                I wonder if there are any emails between Huma and Evelyn? Or if Evelyn is in any of the Podesta emails?

                Liked by 1 person

                • graphiclucidity says:

                  You can search WikiLeaks for her name.
                  I did, she is mentioned a few times in various releases, skimmed through and not much interesting to me.

                  Somebody here mentioned her C.V. is in a Podesta email somewhere looking for a job, I suppose.

                  Liked by 1 person

              • mike says:

                I say, give her, her martyr’s funeral. Fry her.

                Like

              • graphiclucidity says:

                The claim has been that Farkas left DoD because Obama didn’t follow her advice to arm Ukraine with more weapons to fight against the eastern rebels and Russia.

                She jumped ship to the Atlantic Council and the Hillary campaign because Clinton “got it” on Russia.

                This second generation Hungarian-American has been carrying a grudge on Russia her entire life. No wonder McCain loves her.

                Like

                • sagatel says:

                  She forgets to mention Hungarians joined Nazi Germany and invaded Russia in 1941.

                  Liked by 1 person

                • OP says:

                  Add that the big cheese who wrote the isleading Criwdstrike report that Russia did it…Dmitri Alpovitch (sp)…is also a member of Atlantic council…

                  Farkas and Dmitri, 2 Hillary loving, Russia and Trump haters.

                  We will cone to find that Hillary compromise the DNC server, we will kearn that Crowdstrike was FIRST hired to hack Trumps servers…that Dmitri and Farkas set us the Russian red herrings…to then get the IC to follow the red herrings…

                  Then a white hat pulled a double cross back on the DNC server, hacked and leaked details…then Criwdstrike had to scramble and set up the ruse the Russians did it…

                  Dmitri will be discovered as the HACKER.

                  We all know that Hillary knew that servers were magical, that servers could make or break a criminal…

                  The DNC SERVER…

                  The very one the FBI

                  IGNORED

                  is the source of the crimes…not the victim, that we are being told…

                  Farkas leads us to Dmitri and Crowdstrike…

                  Crowdstrike led us to a “fake report”…that Russia did it…

                  Crowdstrike leads us to Dmitri…a double agent…a hacker who pretends to “protect” computers…

                  Crowdstrike…was given by the FBI a wink and nod…as being an EXPERT

                  the real crime was committed by a person via the DNC server…attacks on Trumps server…

                  IGNORED BY THE FBI..

                  HAPPILY, GLEEFULLY IGNORED BY COMEY…

                  Liked by 2 people

                  • graphiclucidity says:

                    I’m not discounting anything at this point.

                    Either Comey is the most incompetent investigator in the history of law enforcement or he’s the most corrupt.
                    There is no in between.

                    Like

        • redlegleader68 says:

          My friends, please remember that there are 17 (yes, SEVENTEEN!!) IC agencies. Among them is the Office of Intelligence and Analysis at the Dept of the Treasury. They track money movement around the globe from an IC perspective. Do you not think that some $$ from Bubba and PIAPS might not have been “swept up?” Just sayin’ …

          Liked by 10 people

    • wheatietoo says:

      Not hardly…it is all intertwined.

      Liked by 1 person

    • And Chelsea Hubbell continues her doomed run to be president. Hee haw!

      Liked by 1 person

      • janc1955 says:

        “Please tell me that’s photoshopped. PLEASE!”

        Like

        • Her ridiculous plastic surgery and live photoshopping by the media is all the proof needed that yes, the #Arkancide crime family intend to run grifter spawn as the next awesome presidential candidate.

          Some alt right poo-pooed the idea, but they just don’t get how grasping, evil, greedy and venal these awful people are.

          They don’t have to win the presidency, they have to stay involved and run the influence and favor peddling scam that sustains them.

          Arkansas was a mafia hotbed in the 1920s and not much has changed other than the CIA presence via Mena etc.

          Liked by 2 people

  7. mrt721 says:

    It kind of gives a new perspective to Obama’s desperate pleading last September,

    “I Will Consider It a ‘Personal Insult’ to My ‘Legacy’ If You Don’t Vote For Hillary”

    Liked by 13 people

  8. paulraven1 says:

    You cannot beat these people playing the game the way we’re playing it. Won’t happen. Need radical change in how we deal with media.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. gadge says:

    Do you think they are showing everything they have regarding the surveillance to Schiff or are they withholding additional stuff from him

    Liked by 2 people

  10. 3x1 says:

    Snopes was mentioned earlier. Enjoy!

    https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2017/03/31/animated-guide-to-snopes/

    Note Kim LaCapria was a sex/fetish blogger “vice vixen”

    Funny video, although a little too racy to post directly (it’s TOMO animated cartoons)

    Now. This is the source using to defend my little brain surgeon, my little 1D chess player. Oh Evelyn, where are youuuuu 😍😍😍😍😍

    Liked by 6 people

  11. Publius2016 says:

    Please remember that Former President Obama had the authority to “unmask” and “unclassify” any item, document or person. Obama ran guns to Mexico, silenced critics and political opponents, started wars in peaceful areas, droned Americans, and praised aSpring Revolution that raped an American Journalist. Alliances were formed with the worst killers on the planet and everyday was a party. Wake up People. The surveillance did not start in 2016 or 2015 it was ever present. With our new President, we have been given a chance to MAGA. Let’s get to work and continue shining the bright light of truth in the faces of RINOs, Nevertrumpers and the MSM. Believe in the power of positive thinking.

    Liked by 13 people

    • the5thranchhand says:

      Right you are Publius; ‘The surveillance did not start in 2016, or 2015, it was ever present’. And, Trump said (jokingly), several times during his campaign, that he was ‘probably’ been surveilled (sp). Trump has known. since day one, obama was gathering information on him. Obama is a rank amateur, unwise in the ways of life and dealing with people, compared to President Trump.

      Liked by 5 people

    • Rock Knutne says:

      Exactly right.

      That genuine Jenius Maxine Waters made reference to it before the 2012 election with her comment about the database of information the Ovomit administration had. The likes of which had never been seen before.

      These people cannot help themselves. Grubering is apparently a Progressive illness.

      Liked by 1 person

  12. wyntre says:

    Spicer schooling reporterette on how to investigate a story. Re: Evelyn Farcas.

    Liked by 25 people

  13. the right phoenix says:

    There once was a liberal named Farkas,
    whose small leak caused quite a big ruckus.
    The beans she did spill about spies on the Hill.
    Blaming Russians will not save her tuckus.

    Liked by 22 people

  14. Charles says:

    “created a list of document serial numbers”
    “The numbers themselves were not classified, said the official.”
    The purpose, said the official, was to make it “harder to bury” the information, “to share it with those on the Hill who could lawfully see the documents,” and to make sure it could reside in an Intelligence committee safe, “not just at Langley [CIA hq].”

    a) The serial numbers didn’t protect Mike Flynn’s name or President Trump’s conversations with the Presidents of Mexico and Australia from being unmasked and leaked.
    b) If only unclassified serial numbers were shared on the Hill, then they wouldn’t need to be kept in an intelligence committee safe. The only reason for keeping the list secret was because they identified an illegal surveillance operation.
    c) If the purpose of the serial numbers only to facilitate sharing with “those on the Hill who could lawfully see the documents”, they could already lawfully see the documents and the serial numbers add no benefit or security.
    d) Anyone on the Hill who received the list of serial numbers is complicit in a coverup of illegal surveillance of candidate Trump’s campaign, because they knew what surveillance had been collected and aided and abetted the coverup of their existence. Whether they saw the documents or not, they knew the surveillance had been done, and they knew the surveillance had been denied, and they knew an investigation was underway, and yet they kept silent to aid in Obama’s coverup.

    Liked by 21 people

    • Gabriel says:

      In regards to a), is it possible that the same collection “methods” that were used on Trump and his transition team, were also used to spy on Trump’s conversations with foreign leaders ?

      Like

      • Charles says:

        Absolutely.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Gabriel says:

          Having gone through repeatedly what Ms. Farkas said to Mika, it just seemed they more concerned with the “who” and “how” the intelligence was collected, than they were the actual intelligence.

          That’s another reason I don’t believe the fake NBC report about the serial numbers, seems like they got that from what Nunes mentioned in an interview earlier in the week.

          Liked by 2 people

          • Trumppin says:

            reminder… Mika and gang sat there listening to FarkAss and didn’t bat an eye… they too knew already what she was saying/admitting

            I so hope they go down

            Liked by 1 person

    • benifranlkin says:

      Thanx for that…a good explanation of why the peeps on the Hill can’t hide behind unclassified document numbers meme

      Liked by 2 people

    • mortgagesforthemasses says:

      I laughed when I saw the NBC coverup story at lunch. It really shows the contempt they have for the American people. Who would believe this tripe.

      May they all rot in hell.

      Liked by 7 people

    • Stringy theory says:

      Kudos Charles. Great comment.

      Liked by 1 person

    • WSB says:

      Well, I guess THAT little plan was a bit rushed.

      Like

    • The only reason for keeping the list secret was because they identified an illegal surveillance operation.

      This is what I’ve been asking.
      If the investigation was lawful, then whoever was tasked with it, FBI, DOJ, CIA whatever, they have the documents and the records of the investigation.

      If it was all done illegally, then there are no records and the Obama Admin needed to protect and save all those documents to leak information.

      Maybe I’m wrong on how it all works. But if the FBI was investigating and they turned over the findings to Obama, the FBI still has the information. They don’t delete it or turn over the only copy.

      So what was Farkas attempting to say when she babbled that it was up to them, to get it to the Hill?
      That it was up to her and all the others in the Obama Admin to protect, keep and disperse these reports before they disappeared?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Charles says:

        It’s a bit more grey and nuanced than one investigation, legal or illegal.

        Prior to July 2016, Obama, Hillary, Democrats didn’t care much about Trump. Opposition research was being collected (the “Trump Dossier” was being assembled/fabricated) but there was little or no surveillance of Trump or his campaign.

        But then Trump won the Republican nomination and the lights in the White House began to burn late into the night. If Trump won the presidency, he could uncover where all the bodies lay, not to mention make good on his campaign promises to reverse Obama’s regulations (and lack thereof regarding law enforcement).

        My “opinion” is that Obama’s DoJ tried for a FISA warrant in July (after Trump won the Republican nomination) to collect dirt on Trump using the Trump Dossier as basis. But the FISA court rejected that first application. At this point, the DoJ directed the FBI to initate an investigation based on the Trump Dossier. As is known, the “Dossier” is laughable and there was little substance to uncover.

        Then Trump won the election, and now he was a threat. Something, anything, was needed to undermine Trump, NSA surveillance was the means to dig, but the NSA had to have authorization. In November following Trump’s win, the FBI (my opinion again) was prodded by the DoJ to reapply for a narrower FISA warrant to surveil Trump’s transition team and this time it was approved. The FBI “uncovered” nothing, because there was nothing to uncover. But beyond the FBI, the NSA surveillance on anything Trumpian was unmasked and disseminated by the CIA or DNI, and then leaked to the press. Hence the illegal disclosures about Flynn.

        The surveillance continued, likely to this day, including Trump’s conversations with the Presidents of Mexico and Australia, which were illegally leaked.

        So the FBI’s “investigation” was legal, but irrelevant and came up empty, but the FBI’s FISA warrant was used, illegally by the CIA or DNI (again my opinion), to collect and unmask Trump transition communications. After a SCIF was setup in Trumnp Tower, Mike Rogers Dir NSA visited Trump and (in my opinion and I gather Sundance’s) told Trump how the NSA was being used against him.

        And then Obama issued executive orders that this unmasked surveillance data be disseminated throughout the government (and naturally leaked).

        So the FBI’s investigation was legal, but the FBI’s FISA warrant authorization was abused by the CIA/DNI (and maybe black hats in the NSA?), and then disseminated by executive order (ostensibly legal) but then illegally leaked.

        Farkas confirmed (blabbed) about the true motives and actions underlying the leaking, and then the “unclassified serial number” story was put out to repair Farkas’ damage (but it is a stupid rationale).

        (mostly my opinion to fit the facts, I think)

        Liked by 6 people

        • This is your custom blend of opinion and facts. I get that. And it works perfectly for me.
          In your theory, CIA or DNI would have done an illegal investigation under the FBI FISA warrant and would never admit or release those facts. That is horrifyingly scary but it puts an end to my questions.
          This has been like hearing a line from a song that never leaves your head. It just replays over and over again.

          Thank you for shedding some light and taking the time.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Charles says:

            “In your theory, CIA or DNI would have done an illegal investigation under the FBI FISA warrant and would never admit or release those facts.”

            Yes. Essentially the CIA/DNI “piggybacked” on the FBI’s FISA warrant.

            The FBI’s jurisdiction is domestic, but the CIA/DNI wanted international surveillance (Russia mainly to buttress the Trump Dossier allegations). The FBI’s FISA warrant authorized the NSA to surveil and where it gets murkey is how all the agencies share the raw NSA data and then unmask the specifics about Trump that the FISA warrant likely excluded. The first warrant (requested by the CIA/DNI in July I’m guessing) was overly broad in converage against a U.S. citizen without adequate justification (the Trump Dossier was plain silly). But the second warrant (requested by the FBI) narrowed to transition team communications and Trump Tower servers (I’m guessing) was approved.

            And then the NSA collects raw data (i.e. everything) and the CIA/DNI unmask selected juciy bits, while the FBI stands around with their thumb up their collective butts.

            Like

        • Maquis says:

          The FBI’s investigation was “legal,” but was under false pretenses for inappropriate purposes. It was still created to serve the same goal, an illegitimate, illegal, and immoral goal. Comey’s refusal to testify, to close an investigation with at best vapor-facts within, and declaring it so sensitive he decided not to inform the oversight committee, for eight months, and only did so as he was to be grilled in a few days time, all cast a huge dark cloud of stink around Comey’s “legal” investigation.

          Like

      • Maquis says:

        First, she had seen the intell and didn’t feel she was seeing sufficient evidence that it was being disseminated and perserved and USED as intended.

        Second, she was concernned about not simply her precious intel being buried by the Trump Administration; she was concerned that they would, upon a potential discovery by PDJT, LOSE ACCESS TO THEIR SOURCES. Meaning the operation was intended to CONTINUE after the Inauguration. She was concerned about existant intel, but seemed most concerned about compromise and loss of their continuing active current and future intelligence.

        This potential loss concernned her and motivated her to push everyone in their little Watergate to the Ten-Thousandth-Power Spy Ring to ensure that all possible data was being created, extracted, shared, disseminated and exploited before the illegal door slammed shut.

        References to the Hill was about the exploitation phase of the data stream. Few were actually involved in moving the purloined information about, it does appear, though it would appear she was encouraging other conspirators in a similar position to act also.

        Her concern about “them” finding out “how they knew what they knew” would appear to be a plea to cover their tracks. Which was strange because she was concerned about a continuing operation with sources that they feared losing; it’s hard to cover your tracks when the operation is ongoing.

        This also raises a point that I haven’t given much thought to thus far…we know Clapper and Brennan (a Devout Muslim Convert CIA Chief? Really?) would move on as Obama did, but their sources were supposed to continue, barring discovery. So who remains in the new Administration that is high enough to run that conspiracy? There’s only one that I can see, and that is Comey. Rodgers appears to be a rather courageous White Hat, and is willing to testify.

        Comey is a definite Black Hat that refuses to testify. Comey often cites his “ongoing Russia Trump” investigation, started last July, only notified Congress days before a Congressional inquiry. We know there is no Trump Russia anything, we know it’s not “sensitive” enough to warrant hiding it from the Congressional Intelligence Oversight Committee. So it’s very likely cover to allow him to hide his CONTINUING involvement in the Anti-Trump Domestic Spy Ring.

        I am fully convinced of Fracas’ allusion to a continuing conspiracy gathering even more intel on PDJT, active sources possibly still functioning, as intended.

        As to the current GrandMaster of the Scandal to top all our Scandals thus far, I’m pinning the tail on the most likely A$$, but I am not declaring that to be so, just what I can figure out thus far.

        Oh, and if we ever get around to cutting into Killary’s wretched carcass, chances are good that her Scandals will surpass Farcas’ Big Adventure.

        Liked by 2 people

    • Ted says:

      Yes, yes, yes!
      Please, everyone and at least one reporter, put this together and start asking painfully obvious quetions regarding the things Charle’s highlights.

      Like

  15. Phil aka Felipe says:

    Black Hats: Uh, Oh! Farkas Farked us!

    White Hats: You’re Farked!

    Liked by 5 people

  16. Gabriel says:

    So once it’s determined who the high-level intelligence official is ( is the story turns out to be true ), then the question becomes, at whose behest was the unmasking done at ?

    Then keep working backwards until you get to the nest.

    Like

  17. Walt614 says:

    It’s very possible that we NOT ONLY have Barry Sotero and his shady collection of marxists by the shorthairs, but based on current and fairly predictable future handling of these Revelations by the Uniparty AND Globalist Mis-information Ministry (MSM)…
    …we got the WHOLE LOT
    A GLORIOUS Three-for

    Liked by 11 people

  18. Bert Darrell says:

    Is there any doubt that Obama committed felonies while in high office and should be indicted as soon as he steps back in the USA? Is there any doubt that Obama was involved in multiple criminal activities while in office? Is there any doubt that Obama committed treason in making outrageous concessions and paying cash under the table to Iran while negotiating the treaty? Is there any doubt that Obama should be put in jail for life as a severe warning to future Manchurian candidates wannabes? And is there any doubt that Michelle Obama was his accomplice and equally belongs in jail?

    Liked by 20 people

    • nevercrywolf says:

      No doubt.
      This is why I despise the republicans as much as I do the Communist/Democrats. It is a Uniparty they only protect each other and could not care less about the American Citizen, Freedom and Liberty.
      Many Politicians should be in jail and Obama and the Clintons should have been there years ago.

      Liked by 11 people

      • Trumppin says:

        I would never presume Michelle is not smart enough.. she was hooked up with valerie jarret long before bathhouse barry – I’d dare to say michelle was the bigger brain – got all the spoils but won’t be on the hook for any of it like barry will be

        Like

    • jakegr says:

      With you on all but Michelle. She is not smart enough to understand all the interworking pieces of corruption. Obama only married her because he needed to marry a Black with a capital B Black woman in order to ingratiate himself to the black voters he needed to succeed in politics.

      Liked by 2 people

      • the5thranchhand says:

        Michelle is a hate-monger(er). And, she went along with all the corruption (actually, treason) willingly, because whether she is smart enough, or not, to understand all the interworkings, she hates the United States as much, maybe more, than that poor excuse of a human being, obama.

        Liked by 5 people

      • Joe Knuckles says:

        She knew. She was the one that said “We need to change our whole history” in 2008. That’s what our schools have done in the years since.

        Liked by 3 people

      • bearsgrrr says:

        “Woman”? I just had a thought that Michelle was picked as the spouse because she has plenty of baggage to keep her in line with blackmail, along with a greedy, lazy, self-entitled, easily bribed personality.

        Like

    • Billy Dunn says:

      Would the DOJ be the people to prosecute these criminals ?

      Liked by 1 person

    • Southern Son says:

      MAGA!
      Make Alcatraz Great Again!!

      Liked by 10 people

    • Patriot/1 says:

      No there is no doubt any of that should happen. But, will any of it, I doubt it. Unless we get off our asses and demand it!!!

      Like

    • deqwik2 says:

      Let’s not forget about another woman that loved helping Obama.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Maquis says:

      Yes, there is doubt. Prison is an inappropriate remedy.

      Firing squad or hanging are the only satisfying and appropriate responses to his level of treason and sedition, not to mention setting huge parts of the world on fire.

      I consider Obama to be the first near genocidal political mass-murderer of this century. I suspect that, considering all that has transpired after he lit the Mid East aflame and toppled governments left and right. Delivering Egypt to the principal supporters and creators of Islamist Jihadism Imperative Terror organizations World-Wide, well over a million lives have been lost. He is also directly responsible for the Muslim Invasion of Europe, and that alone may well surpass Hiltler’s toll when all is burned and gone.

      He is responsible for the looting of antiquities on a scale not seen since WWII, and for the reduction to rubble of dozens of temples and structures of ancient date and inestimateable value. Entire cities that had been built over ancient gravesites were razed so those graves could be looted.

      ISIS, Obama’s Boys, “discovered” warehouses worth of treasures in such manner, never to be seen or studied, either destroyed, melted down, or sold to unscrupulous “collectors.” We will never be able to calculate the losses of life and cultural artifacts lost to Obama’s “Laisser Tuer” approach to the Middle East and the World in general.

      Prison, writing his memoirs, granting interviews, and admiring his ugly mug in a scratched up stainless-steel-mirror are far too good for Obama.

      Like

  19. anthohmy says:

    There is always Maxine “Obama’s Got A Database” Watters to fall back on.

    Liked by 16 people

  20. ledygrey says:

    NUNES video interview this morning at KMJ 580am Fresno (Nunes home district) regarding latest on intel investigation:
    http://www.kmjnow.com/2017/03/31/video-nunes-discusses-russia-investigation-on-kmj/

    Like

  21. MVW says:

    So, we have put up with the criminal media for nearly 2 years. When will the Potomac be rerouted to wash out the stables?

    What does it take to clean out the CIA black hatters?

    Liked by 1 person

  22. NJF says:

    Per FBN, Schiff released statement & tells us, “info not important and Nunes is wrong.”

    /paraphrase.

    Like

  23. WeThePeople2016 says:

    FOX has “Breaking News” just now that Trump called Schiff to the WH after he was shown the information.

    Liked by 7 people

  24. Howie says:

    Maybe public funded coffee houses would help. We will have to find a way to triage the snowflakes.

    Liked by 1 person

  25. If Rogers is THE white hat, then it means that the “sources and methods” are not NSA sigint but human or other method, right? (Rogers never would have let illegal info into the Presidential Daily Briefing in the first place, if that logic is correct.) And Farkas was very concerned about the exposure of her/Obama’s particular sources and methods in this case. So routine electronic data from NSA seems not to fit her concerns.

    So is Rogers really Nunes source?

    Like

  26. StateSovereigntyNationalUnion says:

    Maria reverses demo party trick always used against GOP, calls for Schiff to recuse himself:

    Liked by 21 people

  27. recoverydotgod says:

    Annals of Diplomacy
    MARCH 6, 2017 ISSUE
    TRUMP, PUTIN, AND THE NEW COLD WAR
    By Evan Osnos, David Remnick, Joshua Yaffa and

    https://www.google.com/amp/www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/06/trump-putin-and-the-new-cold-war/amp

    -snip-

    Finally, she gave up trying to convince Obama. “I was so done,” she said. “I was so tired of fighting.” She resigned in October, 2015, and eventually became a foreign-policy adviser to Hillary Clinton, who had sometimes favored the use of military force when Obama did not. “The crazy thing was, when I joined the Clinton campaign, I was, like, Great, I’m not going to have to fight anymore, because she got it on Russia,” Farkas said. “Then it just got worse.”

    -snip-

    Liked by 2 people

    • c says:

      Why does Farkas have such a Russian obsession?? She sounds like McCain and the neo cons–is she having an affair with McCain? Its not in America’s interest to go to war with Russia or China. Theres a far bigger enemy as Pres Trump has said-ISIS. What is wrong with these people? Do they want global annihilation?

      Like

      • graphiclucidity says:

        Her father is a Hungarian exile who participated in the 1958 Revolution there.

        She’s hated Russia her entire life because of it.

        Like

  28. jeans2nd says:

    Re: the last paragraph of the NBC article shown above –

    Not true. Of the committee members, only Nunes and Schiff could lawfully see those documents. Storing even the document numbers “in an Intelligence committee safe” would indicate an attempt to assist in unlawful activities. Unlawful activities which began when, exactly?

    The linked article on the NBC News web page containing this article includes a link to a Michael Flynn story, that once again conflates the Russia investigation with the Illegal Surveillance/Unmasking investigation.
    “Flynn and Nunes Fallout Over Russia Probe Grows Ominous for Trump White House”
    http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/flynn-nunes-fallout-grows-ominous-trump-white-house-n740956

    Am going back to promoting National Enquirer in the checkout line at Marcs. At least the Enquirer tells the truth.

    And our POTUS is still quite the Artful Dodger, is he not?

    Liked by 1 person

  29. deqwik2 says:

    More about what Schiff said after viewing documents.

    Like

  30. ajudicator says:

    Obama politically weaponizing the intelligence community to “wiretap” pre-GOP nominee and President-elect Trump, is Watergate on steroids! The only difference is that Obama is a Democrat and the MSM is an extension of the DNC. If an outgoing Republican president had illegally spied on an incoming Democrat president, the MSM would be hyping the issue 24/7 and calling for the outgoing Republican president’s criminal trial and incarceration.

    Liked by 6 people

    • cozette says:

      It’s not a Democrat versus Republican thing. McCain is Trump’s most deadly foe. This is anti interventionist, economic nationalists versus neo con war mongers and globalist. Notice the propaganda media is lionising globalist pro war with Russia neo cons like McCain and George Bush! The Deep State military industrial black hats are fighting the patriotic nationalist white hats. BTW the epicenter of evil in the GOP is the neo cons and Freedom Caucus globalists. They ate more rabidly anti MAGA than many Democrats. It’s not the label it’s the beliefs.

      Like

  31. John Doe says:

    Like

  32. treeper1956 says:

    Looks like our own Sundance maybe responsible for saving our republic.

    Liked by 3 people

  33. jmclever says:

    People do not just run for president in a whim. If they were spying on him that early, there may be an enemy within the group of people Trump consulted before he even announced.

    Liked by 2 people

  34. Roses are red
    Penguins are dapper
    I wonder if the guy behind this is named….

    Liked by 2 people

  35. JoD says:

    WOW! That new avatar has turned Howie into a whirling dervish!!
    The “Hook” is everywhere!!
    I’m lovin’ it!!

    Liked by 1 person

  36. Athena the Warrior says:

    Excellent interview from Intelligence person Mike Pregent being interviewed by Fox News Sandra Smith. Nunes meeting was done right:

    Liked by 3 people

  37. Charlotte says:

    Gen Flynn’s attorney Robert Kelner is an attorney with Covington & Burling LLP.
    AND
    Gen Flynn Better watch out -Mike Flynn attorney Robert Kelner supported ‘Never Trump’ favorite Evan McMullin ex CIA

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/mike-flynn-attorney-supported-never-trump-favorite-evan-mcmullin/article/2619029

    Q: Is Flynn aware?
    Q; IS Flynn planning on rolling on Pres Trump?

    Liked by 3 people

  38. Watcher says:

    Is Schiff going to call Dark as to testify, she’s a Russian expert.

    Free raw intelligence shifter.
    The Russian ambassador is a party animal.

    Like

  39. jakeandcrew says:

    Liked by 2 people

  40. 3x1 says:

    The “we’re gonna number documents to protect them” concept is infantile in this age.

    http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/obama-officials-made-list-russia-probe-documents-keep-them-safe-n741146

    The media is co-conspirator in regurgitating this idiocy.

    Liked by 1 person

  41. Rock Knutne says:

    Great stuff Sundance.

    I look forward to each evening thanks to your r search.

    Like

  42. US says:

    Madam Farked loudly and drew attention today, yet we heard the same from Lois Lerner yesterday.

    Like

  43. Charlotte says:

    How Eric Holder’s Corporate Law Firm Is Turning Into a ‘Shadow Justice Department’ | VICE News

    https://news.vice.com/article/how-eric-holders-corporate-law-firm-is-turning-into-shadow-justice-department

    Peter Schweizer, the president of the conservative Government Accountability Institute, told VICE News that Covington has long cultivated lawyers like Holder to help their Wall Street clients avoid prosecution.

    “If you’re a large bank and you want to stay out of the crosshairs of the DOJ, who are you going to hire — someone who’s been in the private sector, or a DOJ guy?” he asked. “You go with the DOJ guy.”

    Like

  44. ZC says:

    Did we ever! dodge the most toxic bullet imaginable, on November 8th.

    Liked by 2 people

  45. Charlotte says:

    4 Facts About Covington & Burling, Eric Holder’s Law Firm Poised to Fight Trump

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/01/06/4-facts-covington-burling-eric-holders-law-firm-poised-fight-trump/

    Like

  46. jogreggre says:

    God bless Admiral Mike Rogers, the only white hat in this entire God forsaken mess.

    Like

  47. Voice of Reason says:

    Schumer knew all about the spying on Trump and his associates and the IC plot to take him down back in January.

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-04/did-chuck-schumer-just-threaten-donald-trump

    I didn’t think much about that story then but now it fits into this puzzle quite well.

    Like

  48. Ber Knar says:

    Flipping channels on Fri. night and stopped and took in the last part of this. http://www.msnbc.com/mtp-daily/watch/what-did-the-obama-wh-know-about-russia-investigation-911440963800

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s