The #NeverTrump team, specifically the punditry within it, are doing what the professionally republican clans do every time they lose. They pout, gnash their teeth, stomp their feet and eventually carry off their football.
They are annoying insignificant gnats full of self-importance that can be cast into a pit of irrelevance. These are the same voices who rejoiced when the were granted audience with President-elect Obama in 2008.
These are also the same insufferable small-minded dolts who stand up at CPAC and applaud House Speaker Omnibus Paul Ryan, while never even thinking about -let alone reconciling- the reality of the last federal budget being passed in 2007.
When was the last time this group assembled their efforts to protest congress spending the 2009 Stimulus year-after-year-after-year. Have you ever even heard them mention it? Did you know our treasury re-spends the trillion dollar ARRA stimulus every year?
Conservatives? Yeah, enough said.
Yes, this group it also includes the intellectually dishonest radio screamer and crony-constitutionalist professional book seller Mark Levin; along with the cheeto-faced religious sycophant and professionally hypocritical Glenn Beck; and we can’t leave out the infamous master of professionally obtuse gaslighting, Rush Limbaugh.
Thanks to Donald Trump, each of these voices are now left flailing wildly in a vain effort to retain their relevance while selling Super Beets.
There is an expression:
“I will leave you naked before your enemies”…
A proactive assertion essentially stating: if you chose to engage in war with me – not only do I promise your defeat against my interests, but I will lay you open to exposure from all adversaries – who will then take advantage of your new vulnerability.
We noted in September of last year how presidential candidate Donald Trump was doing a remarkable job filling the role behind this proclamation.
In a seismic political shift, Trump has gone far beyond drawing a line in the sand. He openly dug a trench on his pre-selected battle space within conservative/republican encampments.
Without any apology or hidden motive, he filled the trench with a highly explosive electorate fuel (the result from years of Republican lies and deceit) and he openly stood behind his common sense formation twirling a Zippo while looking toward the deceivers.
As a direct result of his approach the enemy inside the wire were being forced to expose themselves.
The various “Robert’s-The Bruce”, per se’, were put in a precarious position of attacking Trump in a vain effort to retain their career ruse. However, when they attacked the very principles they previously claimed were core tenets to their own beliefs, they also exposed their own alignment with the usurping powers within the GOPe machine.
In September of 2015 Jonah Goldberg writing for National Review penned an outline encapsulating his disappointment toward those who support Donald Trump. After a few days of reflection we, coincidentally along with John Nolte via Breitbart, responded.
Our initial response, “An Open Letter To Jonah Goldberg“, was not advancing the proposition that Donald Trump was the be-all end-all harbinger of conservatism, it was never our intent.
Exactly the opposite is true, which is profoundly evident in my own expressed motives “Why I Support Donald Trump” Part I, Part 2 and Part 3. The key word in that prior paragraph is “motive”; we stand open with our motive – the opponents do not.
We used the metaphor our constitutional republic was akin to the most beautiful classic car ever created, a beauty that is now in desperate need of restoration.
This metaphor allowed me to present the question:
Do we begin restoration to remove the rust with a ground up painstaking process intended to regain the full value, but will be exceedingly costly; or, do we as a nation once again put bondo over the rot and give it an appearance only paint job to maintain the impression?
My supported position, given all the rot and disrepair we know exists, was not to ignore the growing insufferable issues evident by hiding problems (McConnell, Boehner, Ryan, U.S. CoC) under layers of shiny paint (Romney, Jeb, Kasich, Cruz et al).
Instead we proposed, and many like-minded agreed, we tear it down (using Trump) and begin an arduous but worthy process of rebuilding.
Given that proposition, it would be silly to think we should take Lady Liberty to the restoration “finisher”.
We first need to take her to the world class “body team”, Donald Trump, who have the ability to take her down to the frame, cut out the rust, and rebuild the original foundation. This is the essential element in a proper restoration. Make America Great Again !
They decry the laying of facts for why it is better to take Lady Liberty down to the foundation (removal of the rot), by arguing the body team is not experienced enough in the art of finishing.
Either they don’t want to see the rot and rust, or those voices are comfortable with the rot and rust.
However, they defend years of associations with vested interests (Beltway DC political crowd) who hold a like-minded view of the body politic (bondo just fine), by claiming restoration opponents are not delivering an appropriate curriculum vitae for the chosen “finishing” contractor.
However, worse than just defending the “status quo” approach, they try to hide their agenda and self-interest; thus they become “the enemy inside the wire” that Donald Trump is exposing.
How do we know this to be true?
It’s really not that difficult.
First, you’ll never see Goldberg or Lowry pen an opinion “why I support”, or “why I don’t support”, and then begin to outline their advocacy. Nope, they wouldn’t actually advocate for something they’d be held accountable for; that’s too risky.
Instead, each prefers to float in that weird space where personal stake (financial livelihood) is viewed through the prism of risk.
What if their Lords and Masters take exception? What happens then?
Secondly, we give you factual examples from NRO which carries a specific intent.
Headline: “The Great Trumpian Divide“, and the original coded headline message:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/423901/donald-trump-conservatives-war (<– note “conservatives war”)
Beyond the headline’s inherent message, “conservatives war”, and considering the Lords and Masters, look closely at the article, and compare to the article they are refuting, and you’ll find something revealing:
When you identify what’s missing – SEE HERE – you can see what Goldberg and Lowry chose to specifically leave out.
There’s a conscious act here. They didn’t just copy/paste the bullets, they intentionally chose to leave out two bullets that are between the circled bullet points they could accept.
What is it about those two hidden truths that represents such risk?
Why did Jonah Goldberg and Rich Lowry view those two specifically removed points as too uncomfortable to present in their publication? The motive is brutally evident.
The Lords and Masters:
What these dolts don’t seem to understand is our opposition is not just toward President Obama and the professional leftists. Our opposition is also toward the insufferable UniParty aspect of the GOPe, the professionally republican.
Yes indeed, Donald Trump has left all America’s adversaries naked to their enemy, and for the first time in decades we were afforded an awakening to see who the enemy is “inside the wire”.
Many masks were removed:
Once you see the strings on the marionettes it becomes impossible to watch the show and not see them any longer.
It’s virtually guaranteed this group of gnats will stomp off and find another larger gnat to represent them. They have to, because Donald Trump will:
- stop illegal immigration
- enforce existing immigration laws to include deportation
- build a wall on the Southern border
- force congress to pass a budget
- tear up anti-American trade deals
- create U.S. jobs
- support the middle-class, and
- Look out for America’s best interests.
These gnats just can’t allow that agenda to go unchallenged.