Report: Valerie Jarrett Was Behind Leaks Of Hillary Clinton’s Email Scandal…

Obama with Valerie Jarrett(Via New York Post) It’s the vast left-wing conspiracy.

Obama senior adviser Valerie Jarrett leaked to the press details of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private e-mail address during her time as secretary of state, sources tell me.

But she did so through people outside the ­administration, so the story couldn’t be traced to her or the White House.

In addition, at Jarrett’s behest, the State Department was ordered to launch a series of investigations into Hillary’s conduct at Foggy Bottom, including the use of her expense account, the disbursement of funds, her contact with foreign leaders and her possible collusion with the Clinton Foundation.

Six separate probes into Hillary’s performance have been ­going on at the State Department. I’m told that the e-mail scandal was timed to come out just as Hillary was on the verge of formally announcing that she was running for president — and that there’s more to come.

Members of Bill Clinton’s camp say the former president suspects the White House is the source of the leak and is furious.

“My contacts and friends in newspapers and TV tell me that they’ve been contacted by the White House and offered all kinds of negative stories about us,” one of Bill’s friends quotes him as saying. “The Obamas are behind the e-mail story, and they’re spreading rumors that I’ve been with women, that Hillary promoted people at the State Department who’d done favors for our foundation, that John Kerry had to clean up diplomatic messes Hillary left behind.”

Then, according to this source, Bill added: “The Obamas are out to get us any way they can.”[…[

“Obama and Valerie Jarrett will go to any lengths to prevent Hillary from becoming president,” a source close to the White House told me. “They believe that Hillary, like her husband, is left of center, not a true-blue liberal.”

If she gets into the White House, they believe she will compromise with the Republicans in Congress and undo Obama’s legacy. (read more)

valerie-jarrett

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Dem Hypocrisy, Election 2016, media bias, Notorious Liars, propaganda, Secretary of State, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized, Valerie Jarrett, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

237 Responses to Report: Valerie Jarrett Was Behind Leaks Of Hillary Clinton’s Email Scandal…

  1. Murse says:

    Our government is like the Roman Senate when it was at its height of corruption. Mark Levin called it. He said it was an inside job and I think he came to that conclusion because the gate-keeper MSM went after it. Interestingly enough, Daniel Greenfield opines that it is either Hillary or Biden for president. Obama may want a more Leftist ideologue like Elizabeth Warren to further his campaign of de-exceptionalizing America, which may be the impetus for double-crossing Hillary. I don’t think Warren has a chance in hell, but Obama does not care about his party. His vision of debasing the American brand is more paramount than the future of the Democratic party.

    http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2015/03/its-either-hillary-or-biden.html

    Liked by 3 people

  2. conservalicious says:

    Jarrett is worried that Hillary is not progressive enough??? Sheesh, these people are so vindictive and controlling. Here’s a novel idea, how about letting the citizens select the next President?

    Liked by 2 people

    • F.D.R. in Hell says:

      “…letting the citizens select the next President…”
      You’re dreaming.

      Liked by 4 people

    • west1890 says:

      http://www.jonchristianryter.com/Plain_Talk/130224.html
      In 2008 there were 96,992,000 registered voters who voted. When the “votes” were tallied there were 132,618,580 votes counted. There were 35,626,580 more “votes” than registered voters who cast votes.
      In 2012 a total of 90,682,968 registered voters cast ballots in the election, yet when the “votes” were counted there were a total of 126,988,809…a total of 36,302,841 more votes than registered voters who cast ballots.

      Liked by 4 people

      • 180daysofkindergarten says:

        Exactly. I don’t think the voters chose Obama. I’m pretty sure VJ is intent that the voters don’t choose again. I’m also pretty sure that unless the country wakes up, VJ will have her way.

        Liked by 1 person

      • czarowniczy says:

        Not particularly shocking if you are from a major city, there are even legal systems set up to assist the crooked process.
        If we go back to the 1960 Kennedy-Nixon election JFK won 49.7% of the popular vote while Tricky Dick won 49.6%. JFK carried 23 states while TD carried 26. JFK’s folks took the states that the best Electoral College count BUT there were shenanigans in the College (OK, alleged shenanigans). There were endless complaints that Chicago votes were -ummmm – inaccurate (yah think?) and that threw Illinois with its votes to JFK. But 15 unpledged electors in Alabama, Mississippi and Oklahoma threw their votes to a Dixiecrat SEN Byrd. Just speculation but what if Daley hadn’t have had an alleged hand in voter fraud and Illinois – along with a few from the unpledged electors – had gone to the more conservative Nixon? Lotta money and power riding on the POTUS’s win and illegal things have been done for a lot less.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Murse says:

          Mobster Sam Giancana of Chicago was instrumental in placing JFK in the Whitehouse. Joe Kennedy owed his life to Sam, but when the Kennedys did the double cross and set the DOJ after Sam, the order was given by the mob to assassinate JFK. At that point in time the mob was extremely powerful, not the cartoon caricature that it is today.

          Like

          • czarowniczy says:

            Daley had a huge part in it, Chicago was HIS town and I’d suggest that even Sam played ball with Daley. Old local boss Carlos Marcello was rumored – along with Trafficante -connected to old Joe and his Cuba dealings. A lot of people wonder if JFK’s go-ahead on the Bay of Pigs wasn’t a payback to the Mob for the loss of their Cuba operations.
            I don’t see anyone opening up the files to tell us the truth but as Daley controlled the voting right down to the streets my money’s more on him than Giancana though old Joe’s friendships with shady charters couldn’t have hurt.

            Liked by 1 person

            • rashomon says:

              How about the fractional pennies earned off the money laundering through the Chicago-based banks? Minow, Jenner, Pritzker, Crown, Korshak. Amalgamated, First National, MorganStanley, Chase…should I go on? Just letting money sit overnight earns billions.

              Like

              • czarowniczy says:

                Yeah, back to the cartels and folks like Cuevas who ran a multi-billion a year drug business (did i forget the word ‘alleged’?) in Chicago. Banks received more than fractional pennies for those cash moves. Try moving a few billion in cash aroudn withpouit a bank or banks in your corner. Then we have ING who was fined $619-million for laundering as admitted $2-billion for Cuba and Iran (and G-d knows how much for who else). If they were willing to cough up some 30% in fines of the money they moved how much was left undiscovered? I had a professor in college who said that if we wanted to be respected and bulletproof crooks with white collars we should open a bank. I thought he was a bit ‘off’ until I started seeing what big banks did.

                Like

        • Dixie Darling says:

          the point is there is plenty of statistics to back up the fact that there is fraud involved in our election system so how could the Justice Department win this lawsuit?

          Like

  3. PatriotUSA says:

    She is always there, changing obama’s red diapers and pink panties for him. The hate runs deep between the first black POTUS (Bill Clinton) and the cheap imposter we are currently burdened with. I wish they would somehow kill each other off, all of the leftards.

    Like

  4. art tart says:

    I’m not surprised, Hillary burnt a bridge w/Obama when she criticized him over Syria, nobody gets away w/criticizing Obama & then gets his support when he has been publicly embarrassed, especially by a woman. Then it so happened, Bubba/Hillary were vacationing in the Hamptons the same time Obama/Moochelle were shortly after this made news. The joke was: Bubba/Hillary would kiss the butt of Obama & make nice as they needed his support to back Hillary. It appears they won’t be getting it, LOL.

    ‘Hillary Clinton Criticizes Obama on Syria Policy’

    http://time.com/3097964/hillary-clinton-syria-isis-the-atlantic/

    Like

    • Murse says:

      I have been waiting for Bill to come out swinging. I find it hard to believe that the Clinton’s are unable to find some ruinous Obama dirt with traction. I know they were hoping for some quid-pro-quo but now its time for the gloves to come off.

      Liked by 9 people

      • Annie says:

        Looks like a power shift has occurred in the Dem. party; and the Chicago thugs own more powerful people than the Clintons. If the opposite were true, Bubba would have come out swinging by now. Remember that line he remarked something about Obama should be getting them coffee? Probably that line was not forgotten either by Obama and his mother, Valjar.

        Liked by 3 people

      • RJ says:

        Time for the Clinton game of “Triangulation” where Hillary seeks to destroy the republicans (with the help of McConnell and his sidekick Boehner) while also attacking B. Hussein O. (who is directed by Robespierre Jarrett) so that she “appears” above the fray running to the sound of battle on behalf of America with Huma carrying a flag (double sided with some muslim logo no one here in the USA can read nor understand) off to her right (symbolism must come into play!)…in a modified pants suit with a frock coat as she did in her UN presentation of self defense (the “Screw You!” speech which for years will be compared to Nixon’s “Checkers” speech by young wanna be journalists…soldiers for the truth!).

        In other words, we lose–they win…same old, same old…

        We need a warrior who is not afraid to punch someone in the mouth with words that ring “truth to wanna be power lovers!”

        As Obama the muslim lover/Jew hater leaves office shouting “Look how I wrecked the United States in only 8 years…suckers!” Americans will wonder just what “hit them” as they lay on the floor of humanity dazed beyond anything imaginable.

        Liked by 1 person

      • F.D.R. in Hell says:

        Trust me, the Clintons have the goods on Obama. There were brief hints dropped in the 2008 Campaign, which the news media quickly swept under the (prayer) rug.
        Bill and Hilla-the-Hun will unravel the boy’s legacy, whether from inside or from outside the White House. It’s much too soon right now. All the ducks must be in a row first.
        It’s going to quack you up to watch. Guaranteed. 👿

        Liked by 12 people

        • nimrodman says:

          Yeah, I wonder if the Clintons have got the inside skinny on how that birth certificate was manufactured out there in Hawaii. Democratic Governor and all that.

          And maybe they know what was pulled out of Hussein’s passport file in that office break-in by Brennan’s boys.

          If so, they’re likely to pass those tidbits out thru third-party patsies for deniability, just like ValJar and Hussein have done here. Two can play that game, y’know.

          Hillary’s toast. With these “6 State Department investigations”, Val and O can keep dribbling bits out all thru the next 2 years of election cycle. Hill will have to fold, a viable candidacy can’t endure that.

          Liked by 1 person

        • auscitizenmom says:

          I’m trusting you F.D.R. (Hm, is that really a good idea I wonder?)

          Liked by 2 people

        • Col.(R) Ken says:

          F.D.R., if I recall correctly, it was Hillary ‘s PA campaign manager who raised the issue “not qualified” for office. Now, if Bill has the goods, on Obola, timing is everything. Either before the Demorats convention, or shorty thereafter. Your thoughts,

          Liked by 2 people

          • F.D.R. in Hell says:

            I salute you, Col. Ken, for reading my mind. 😉

            Liked by 1 person

          • How does exposing Obama’s ineligibility help Hillary Clinton? America would turn against the Democrat Party for perpetrating a massive fraud on us. I believe they’d do that ONLY after Hillary decides not to run, as payback.

            I agree that Hillary Clinton is very dangerous. I’m not sure Valerie Jarrett is tough enough to defend herself. Obama comes across to me as weak and lazy. But, the powers-that-be behind Obama are destroying Hillary Clinton’s chances again. They don’t want her, so she won’t be the nominee. It’s over for her, not because of Conservative attacks, rather her own party can stand her.

            Liked by 1 person

            • Dixie Darling says:

              the trouble is Jarrett will have to go up against both Hillary and Bill…..now that could really be dangerous….for Jarrett. Let’s go ahead and get out the popcorn for THE SOAP OPERA OF THE CENTURY!

              Liked by 2 people

            • Justice_099 says:

              “America would turn against the Democrat Party for perpetrating a massive fraud on us. ”

              I doubt the average American would care any more than they cared when the question was raised in the first place. People (the average voting population) just blindly pull the lever for the party they think they are. They don’t generally follow individual politicians. They don’t attend primaries and conventions to pick the candidate. And they are completely desensitized to scandals, no matter how big they are.

              Liked by 1 person

              • I sure hope you’re wrong about that, 099. IF it turns out that they have irrefutable proof that Barack Obama was not eligible to run for President…. Democrats would have a very serious problem on their hands.

                Like

                • F.D.R. in Hell says:

                  Democrats would have a serious problem with his ineligibility?
                  Hell, the USA would technically have to roll back eight years of legislation and events, which have cost the lives and livelihood of millions of Americans.

                  Face it, the toothpaste’s not going back into the tube…and America will never recover from Obama’s Hammer & Sickle Cell Anemia. 😦

                  Liked by 1 person

            • F.D.R. in Hell says:

              FW, no one is saying that bringing Obama down will help Hillary. She has passed the point-of-no-return in image rehabilitation. She will either be “installed” as #45 or heads will roll. Oops, maybe there’s a better analogy, considering all the Moslem Brothers and Sisters in the US Government. 😈

              Liked by 3 people

          • JohnP says:

            “Not Qualified”, “Benghazi”, “Gun Running to the Muslim Brotherhood”, and God knows what else.
            If Valerie steps on Hillary had enough this could become a blood feud and the Clinton’s wrote the book on manipulating a story in the press. Keep the popcorn handy, just in case. My money is on the one smart enough to have her own private email server.

            Liked by 1 person

          • kpm58 says:

            Will not a key factor be in who chooses the delegates for the convention?

            Like

      • lovelyd24 says:

        I think they are still in the safety deposit stage, swinging is for after the quiet pressure doesn’t work.

        Like

      • west1890 says:

        I suspect the Clintons know who aka Obama really is- his past, his actual parentage, all of it. Their quandary- how do get what they know “out there” without their complicity in the fraud destroying them…and the D party and very likely the complicity of the RINOS?

        Like

  5. art tart says:

    Hillary’s got a million problems. Maureen Dowd wrote an “open scathing letter” of criticism to Hillary again for the NY Times which will give Hillary another headache in the morning.

    LOL, M, Dowd said: It’s all so drearily familiar that I know we’re only moments away from James Carville writing a column in David Brock’s Media Matters, headlined, “In Private, Hillary’s Really a Hoot.”

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/15/opinion/sunday/maureen-dowd-an-open-letter-to-hdr22clintonemailcom.html?_r=1

    Like

  6. Aslan's Girl says:

    So, Val has the hots for O’Malley? Because Hillary’s undoing is the making of him.

    Like

    • RJ says:

      Yea, and take a close look at O’Malley…playing his guitar with that black, sleeveless shirt showing off his “guns” suggesting he loves his self…more than he ever could love you…that average person he must seduce to gather up the votes to march into office where he will dazzle everyone with his…arm waving and big phony smile supported by words so empty one’s eyes gaze down in “not again…what’s wrong with us?”

      Like

  7. Amy says:

    laughing out loud is all i have to say
    I don’t know if I believe this or not.
    I had Jeb Bush was responsible for the email scandal? I am behind, I know. Damn kids will do that.

    Like

  8. afghanvet18f says:

    Does not make much sense that OB and mini Rasputin would sabotage the Hildebeast. If she goes down in flames she will take OB down with Bengazi/ Syrian gun running testimony. Not to mention other unscrupulous factoids regarding OB’s mid-east manipulations.

    Like

    • So, we get to the biggest crux of the thing. Who, in the end, can play the dirtiest??

      Hillary has the most to lose re: the Clinton Foundation and the money fountain in the lobby, so I think the Clinton’s will fold, to a point. Besides, I’m taking the whole “will be there [WH] until the lights go out” to mean never will these marxist/political jihadis leave power until the US is completely decimated.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Col.(R) Ken says:

      This battle is for the destruction of the United States, Clinton will not fold, he in. Mimie (ValJ) better not get to comfortable in her chair.

      Liked by 1 person

  9. Sundance’s post said “that John Kerry had to clean up diplomatic messes Hillary left behind.”

    So, um, does that make Hillary the new Bush???

    Like

  10. Daniel says:

    I didn’t see that one coming. So Obama is behind it. So it would seem the ball is in Hillary’s court now. She knows were the bodies are buried — or at least some of them. Does she now expose Benghazi? The IRS scandal? I hope she doesn’t go down without taking Obama with her.

    Liked by 5 people

    • mcfyre2012 says:

      The new Progressive White House was always been behind it. Shrillary was made SecState not only keep tabs on her, but to keep her in check. Besides, give her enough rope, and she’ll hang herself, eventually. And that’s exactly what is happening. The Clinton’s are slick, but their greed for power and money will be their downfall.

      Liked by 1 person

    • John Galt says:

      “I didn’t see that one coming. So Obama is behind it.”

      I knew it was leftist in origin by the way the leftist media picked it up and ran.

      Liked by 1 person

  11. Frances Muldoon says:

    That anyone would listen to what Bill Clinton has to say is mind blowing.. The only thing that exceeds that is that anyone would seriously consider his wife as a president.

    Why they are both not in prison takes it to a new level.

    Like

    • F.D.R. in Hell says:

      Vince and others down here agree with you, Officer.

      Liked by 1 person

    • joanfoster says:

      Your comment Frances could be written exactly the same way for the Obamas. If the WH knew that Hillary was using a private server on a private non-government issued device with a non government issued email, then the WH has known and accommodated this for four years. The WH in my opinion was complicit with the lawbreaking most likely because they have their own private, off site server and are doing the same thing.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Murse says:

      I didn’t vote for Bill, but I can say that his presidency was unremarkable. Outside of adding to the national debt he was relatively harmless. He tried to go Left (Hillarycare) but his party suffered for it and he came back to the center. However, he could have killed Bin Laden and chose not to do so. 9/11 may not have happened if he had taken action on Laden.

      Like

  12. BitterC says:

    Just have this to say.

    Back in 08 I would have preferred Hill to Barry. Was kinda surprised she didn’t have the ovaries to challenge in 12 ala the entitled Ted Kennedy run of 80 that went off the bridge.

    After 8 yrs of the grass roots agitator/organizor-in-chief this country cannot take another Dem that will have to play to the exteme left wing.

    The fact that Soros, I mean Barry’s people are going public in taking Clinton, Inc down scares me.

    The Marxists don’t even think they have to hide or play coy anymore. Clinton inc is dirty but has been for over 20 yrs. The fact that the left is finally willing to force on them their day in court is more scary to me than uplifting. This is NOT being done with an eye to what’s best for our country.
    I view this more as a coming out, we are now close to being destroyed from within and they don’t care who knows, since so few are paying attention and another few think they are saving the world protesting for criminals. For the left to take Clinton, Inc down smacks of Paris late 1700’s or Russia early 1900.

    Sorry to take the fun out of watching Hillary crash and burn, but if Peace Prize is in on it, it can’t be good.

    Liked by 5 people

    • RJ says:

      Sharp vision, good insight…it’s a generation of narcissists who won’t leave the stage until they present their final “act” for all to see!

      “I feel your pain!”

      Like

    • auscitizenmom says:

      Yes, the more I think on this, the more concerned I get that Hitlery is being taken down. If she is so “far to the center” as to not be wanted in the WH by this administration, how far left is the next candidate going to be?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Les says:

        They are forgetting the women. Will the WWLL (Women Who Lean Left) be offened by the Hillary sacrifice? Who do they love more? The younger, hipper, darker ones will still worship the Great O, but they will lose the powerful WWLL. Businesswomen won’t like this. I’m curious as to how this will play out.

        Like

      • Frances Muldoon says:

        This concerns me as well. She certainly would have been little more than a puppet leader, but the fact that she has lost support is most troubling. Is there a more eager to please lapdog in the wings beyond Hilary?

        Maybe she has no stomach for war or maybe the real leaders do not want a woman CIC when the big invasion of the Middle East goes down.

        Like

  13. Kitty Smith says:

    I’ve suspected the administration for the start as being behind the leak of her skullduggery, especially when o-bama said the other day that he’d received personal emails from Hillary. Obviously those are classified. This sort of treachery upon Hillary’s treachery is no less than to be expected. Valerie Jarrett has always been the operative of the really big stuff.

    A match made in Hell; all of it.

    Liked by 2 people

  14. hollyasbury says:

    Reblogged this on libertybelle diaries and commented:
    Here’s a news item from The Last Refuge blog citing a NY Post report sourcing the Hillary email server scandal to Valerie Jarrett. Make sure you check out the linked story at the NY Post. Feminist dogma can’t change how women fight and ahemmm, there’s a reason it’s called “catfighting”, lol. With women, it’s always a knife in the back, not a punch in the face. Instead of the “war on women”, this might turn into the ‘war of the women”. Expect death by a thousand paper cuts….

    Liked by 1 person

  15. canadacan says:

    Divide and conquer?
    I would love to see Bill Clinton go after Valerie Jarrett that woman needs to be exterminated politically and it is going to take some doing.

    Liked by 6 people

    • joanfoster says:

      While I have no love lost on the Clintons, I would prefer to see them win this battle than see the WH win. Clearly, Obama wants a candidate that he can control and he knows that if Hillary is elected it is a dual Presidency and Bill will put Obama out to pasture for the rest of his life.

      Liked by 2 people

    • F.D.R. in Hell says:

      Easier than you think.
      The Clintons will simply cut her strings.
      Have patience.

      Like

    • springstreet says:

      Clinton will go after ValJar’s Chicago communist roots. Her father-in-law Vernon Jarrett (who held the strings on Chicago Mayor Harold Washington … Michelle’s boss), Bill Ayers (author of Barack’s books) and his wife Bernadine Dohrn (procurer of Barack’s “Law Professor” job … who both lived in his father’s home (where Barack visited to thank them for paying for his education) and, of course, President Smirky Smirk’s “mentor” Frank Marshall Davis … the Hawaiian pornographer who published nude pictures of a Stanley Ann Dunham “look-alike”.
      And then Bill (with his “blue dress” DNA experience), will hunt down ValJar’s father’s DNA research on his Chicago patient’s countries of origin … which will show one aspiring America hater did not have a Nigerian parent … and then was forever under the thumb of an Iranian born tyrant named Valerie Jarrett.

      Liked by 2 people

    • auscitizenmom says:

      Like a roach. {shudder}

      Like

    • ThankYou,Treepers says:

      “I would love to see Bill Clinton go after Valerie Jarrett”

      Maybe she would, too, and is vengeful about being one of the few he’s skipped.

      At least she doesn’t have to worry about her puppet Barry’s womanizing.

      Liked by 2 people

  16. Nycgal says:

    The leak was obvious and inept. Yet it will be fascinating to watch the fallout. Fascinating, and sad to have a front row seat to watch how it all really works.

    Liked by 2 people

  17. Michael Dixon says:

    There’s such a vast disconnect between ordinary Americans and their government that it’s like watching a soap opera to observe this current backstabbing episode. We are intrigued and entertained by the reports of infighting among Democratic Party operatives.

    We are fed information that the news sources want us to have with no way to know what’s true and what’s not true. We live in an us-versus-them world where people we don’t actually know, who are supposed to be working for us, gain more and more control over us with each passing day. We are undergoing a national revolution driven by forces of the political left.

    Like

  18. bofh says:

    Obama attacks Clinton: is it strategic, ideologic, or just plain personal?

    Like

  19. texan59 says:

    Within 90 days this is going to start playing out like the zoo scene of “Cooley High. The “tell” will be if Clinton Inc. gets any traction with their takedown of Obama/Jarrett. Get yer popcorn. 😆

    Liked by 3 people

  20. lovelyd24 says:

    Obama senior adviser Valerie Jarrett leaked to the press details of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private e-mail address during her time as secretary of state, sources tell me

    Wouldn’t it be fascinating to watch a gang war between the Clintons and the Obamas? Popcorn and whiskey ready.

    Liked by 1 person

  21. Mark McNeil says:

    The Clinton’s will release a Obama’s real birth certificate.

    Liked by 5 people

  22. coeurdaleneman says:

    My guess is that the Clintons will swallow their bitter medicine and retreat inside their foundation for the rest of their lives. If they try warfare, then they will be destroyed by the lefties in the media as hacks, to lose even more influence.

    Bill, especially. After all, he’s the white Cosby–and not the black president–these days. Defenseless against these current thugs.

    Like

    • Les says:

      I think he’ll take a few hard swings before he walks away. He won’t hush. He knows a lot of people, has been around quite a few years. And he has a better relationship with the SS/Pentagon/Intelligence. ValJal rules by fear and people stay quite, for now. When the behind-the-scenes folks are given a chance to unload, they just might. Only the mumu’s, Black Power, and true loonies hate America. There are still some old white guys tucked away.

      Like

      • punkinseed says:

        ValJar deliberately leaked that she was the source in this. ValJar doesn’t do anything without a reason behind it and nobody does anything without her approval.
        Remember when Obama told Clinton that he felt Michelle would make a good president? O’Malley and Warren are both smoke screens put out there as distractions. Obama would not have told Clinton about Michelle unless it was ValJar’s idea.
        It’s time for Hilary to start fighting back. Release what she has on Obama’s past, including his fake passports, transcripts and so on. Then, release all of Michelle’s and ValJar’s.

        Like

        • auscitizenmom says:

          Yes, release it all. Before the big gas-leak fire that burns the Clinton’s section of the world. 😯

          Like

          • F.D.R. in Hell says:

            People… don’t ever forget the Clinton’s foreign contributors. Other nations don’t p!ss money down the drain like the US Government loves to do. Contributors are going to protect their interests in America. They may be as fickle as the wind, but they’re not stoopid.

            Like

  23. ThankYou,Treepers says:

    Valerie Jarrett is a typical Third World leader.

    She is obviously correct about Hillary’s failings and misconduct but hardly motivated by altruism. Conscienceless thugs like Jarrett have zero affinity to right over wrong – the sole motive is id driven self interest. She certainly has a path in mind to keep herself in power after this term expires.

    Naturally healthy for strife to be rife between the amoral camps of the Clinton slicksters and the Obama stealth jihadists. Bill’s capable of outwitting the entire Obama crew but the affirmative action media is programed to never fault the quasi Africans.

    Hopefully this blood feud makes it even more likely our nation will shortly be permanently rid of the influence of all of these people. If we had enough clear thinking patriots on Capitol Hill like Steve King we wouldn’t have to risk waiting until the end of this term.

    Like

  24. Monroe says:

    Something similar has happened in 2008. Hillary actually was closer to winning the nomination than what was reported. But she was not even suppose to be at the nominating convention. Let’s clarify the players: Obama/ValJal, Clintons, and Soros. The Clintons were the ones that brought Soros to the US playing field when Bill was in office. Soros was supposed to back Hillary but later pivoted to Obama. Sure the Clintons have info about Obama. But the threat in 2008 remains the same as it does today: physical harm to Chelsea.

    Like

    • czarowniczy says:

      I’m sure that Bill has dirt on Barack just as Barack has dirt on Bill – there was dirt floating around out there on both of them before each one’s election. The thing that’s killer is – proof and you don’t get to where they were at without having some solid info and proof on each other. I don’t see any full-out nuclear exchanges between Bill and BHO, there’d be too much fallout, I see more guerrilla warfare.
      Bill has to sweat someone coming up with a smoking howitzer from his term as Arkansas governor and his relationship with certain US and Latin American officials while BHO has to sweat a number of dark periods in his past having light thrown on them. They would be restrained from going after each other face-to-face by the Party due to the damages that would be done and I’m betting some sort of truce will be worked out pre-2016 election so that Hilary’s campaign can get sent to the body shop.

      Liked by 1 person

    • F.D.R. in Hell says:

      “But the threat in 2008 remains the same as it does today: physical harm to Chelsea.”

      With all due respect, that’s

      Liked by 1 person

  25. czarowniczy says:

    Why…gasp…that would mean this an inside-the-Administration/Party hatchet job! Who’d have guessed it? So the DemocRATS aren’t all in a big circle holding hands?

    Like

  26. zephyrbreeze says:

    It’s like Godzilla vs. Mothra both fighting to destroy America.

    Like

  27. Monroe says:

    Also remember that Obama is just another “useful idiot” in this scheme. ValJar is the brains and Soros has money and the history of destroying governments ( The Orange Revolution). Hillary is a moderate and had very strong support from the Blue Dog Dems, whom also get the support of moderate Republicans. Hillary wrote about Alinsky but turned down his job offer. A bit of socialism is good (police/fire/ems/schools/libraries) but not too much. Hillary is not a commie/marxist and can think for herself. While obama has never had an original thought in his lifetime. Michelle is more accomplished than her husband. She played Chicago politics with the boys and won; she is as corrupt as the Daleys. Watch for her to pull a “Hillary” and get into office.

    Liked by 2 people

  28. lovelyd24 says:

    Part of this could be self preservation, candidate Hilary will get a pass, but not the same pass Obama got from the press and his political opponents. Hillary can destroy Obama with her knowledge of Benghazi, dereliction’s of duty and so on, and if she goes down there is no way she will go down alone.

    Team Obama may feel it is too risky for Hilary to be vetted as a candidate because of their own skeletons that a vetting of candidate Hilary will bring. I think Valerie realizes it is time to obliterate Hilary’s credibility and draw the wagons around Obama.

    Like

  29. Chewbarkah says:

    When the goin’ gets tough, Hillary ALWAYS plays the victim card. Klein’s unnamed-source ploy casts Hillary as the victim of a mean mis-treater. Jarrett is believable in that role, convenient (another Hillary must), and unloved outside the WH. It steers attention from Hillary’s misconduct and crimes, to someone else’s. But as someone wrote above, ValJar would know that the Hillary e-mail story reflects poorly on Obama. IMO, this is a Hillary disinformation operation.

    Liked by 1 person

    • smiley says:

      now that’s interesting.
      very interesting…

      Like

    • texasranchqueen says:

      Interesting indeed… I always have a problem with “unnamed-sources”, a red flag immediately goes up. Why has ValJar not gone screaming to the press or heaven forbid “tweeted” that it was not her, not that anyone would believe her! We definitely have two back stabbing/conniving contestants in “The Real Women of DC War” game. Do we award Round #1 to Hillary with a TKO?

      Liked by 2 people

      • Chewbarkah says:

        Klein claims is that VJ used third parties so there was no trail back to her. Ain’t that convenient. This was structured so that Hillary has no connection to it. ValJar has no one to respond to, and if she raises a ruckus, Hillary’s diversion gets legs. Almost everyone here wants a Hillary-ValJar catfight, so their eyes are not on Hillary’s e-mail scandal, which is really about Hillary selling her office. Hillary KO’s America.

        Like

      • joshua says:

        where is Anthony Weiner when you need a competent “tweeter” to step in and mediate the Democratic field of candidates?

        Like

    • Anne says:

      Mr. Klein also had a fly on the wall quite awhile ago and that pesky fly overheard Bill Clinton urging Hillary to challenge Obama for 2012 Presidential Democrat spot. And, in the end, accordingl to The Fly, Hillary told Bill , “no, that would be disloyal”. Long story short, Hillary came out of the article as loyal soldier and never ever would be a spoiler. Now Mr. Klein has another fly buzzing about his ears and telling him Valerie Jarrett leaked the e mail, server, hullabaloo to wound the already limping Hillary. This most recent insect invasion makes Obama look bad. Obama and Valerie Jarrett attacking Hillary. Believe me, I don’t like Obama and don’t like Hillary and think she is too damn liberal and too old to run for President. I don’t know what is going on. What’s the answer, Ollie???

      Like

  30. doodahdaze says:

    I wonder if she will join Petreus in Valjars marxist lock box?

    Like

    • John Galt says:

      Yes, Trey Gowdy will do most of the work. ValJar just needs to leak a few emails out of the NSA files at the appropriate time.

      Like

  31. 180daysofkindergarten says:

    Both sides are vile imo. The fighting between is as good as political theater gets and they both deserve to be destroyed. Unfortunately that will probably not happen. My money is on team Clinton. Popcorn.

    Liked by 1 person

  32. Les says:

    You can’t trust a Communist. People who are drawn to communism are lazy and greedy by nature and want to profit from the labors of another. The HiveMind forgets to factor in human nature.

    All these “new thinkers” are slow. The “new idea” is old and flawed and doesn’t work. Their arrogance = ignorance^2.

    Liked by 2 people

  33. czarowniczy says:

    When life hands you lemons you squeeze them dry and make lemonade. I’m betting that Hillary could take this Obama sneak attack and turn it to her advantage. Were she out promoting the POtuS as the most unpopular POtuS then it shouldn’t be hard for her to turn that negativity to her advantage by making it seem the POtuS unfairly blaming her for outing the secret everyone knew is pure spite aimed at unseating the potential most popular wife of the most popular POTUS in modern (read as ‘short’) public memory. She could make this a personal issue, his attacking a woman candidate, first woman president, working mom, matronly grandma, all because he’s a spiteful and unpopular male. She’s pretty well canned much of the black vote that might come out for a white-white election so she’s out to enchant that segment of the undecided and uncommitted who might just stay home and those new motor-voter folks whose licencias de conducir y tarjetas de registro de votantes still have wet ink.
    Oh to live in interesting times – luckily we have now have ‘wet’ spots in my dry county.

    Liked by 3 people

    • WeeWeed says:

      Yep – my money’s on Granny. Lotz more dead folks floatin’ down that river Denial behind her than Imam Obola The Won.

      Liked by 4 people

    • auscitizenmom says:

      Idunnoknow. I think Bill could pull it off, but I am not sure Hitlery can. She just isn’t quick thinking on her feet and I don’t think she is taking advice from him. Probably too stubborn to.

      Liked by 1 person

      • czarowniczy says:

        Bill’s a born smooth trickster – Hillary’s incapable of pushing her…less smooth…side down long enough to sell ice in hell.

        Like

        • smiley says:

          hell hath no fury as Hillary scorned.
          she doesn’t forget.
          but….is she mellowing in her dotage ?
          BTW..where do you think GS stands in all of this ?

          Like

          • czarowniczy says:

            “….is she mellowing in her dotage ?” I take it that you aren’t married to an older lady with an ax to grind? They don’t mellow – at least not in the way a fine wine would.
            Probably taking the best stand…waaaaaaaay back and behind something solid, it’s gonna get messy.

            Like

            • smiley says:

              um…I’m not of the “persuasion” to marry my own gender…but I get your point re battle ax.
              was thinking maybe there was a very remote chance that being a grandmother and getting older by the minute, she might not be quite up to the fight as much as in the past.
              age is a factor, sometimes.
              this victim thing she’s been doing seems like a sign of weakness (maybe)…(or a clever ploy).
              and then again, some things never change.
              they just get worse.
              and worse.
              and more so.
              shrew-d

              Like

              • czarowniczy says:

                Sorry – Smiley seemed more or less gender neutral so for effect (not affect) I took a stab. Some days bug, some days windshield.
                There were people with whom my wife worked who thought she should have a clipboard, white coat and shock collar – she’s mellowed somewhat in retirement but the UPS guy still leaves everything way down the driveway by the gate.
                Shrewd yes, but I always tend to be on people’s Soricidae.

                Like

                • smiley says:

                  LOL
                  even nurse ratchet had her tender moments.
                  but…not for long.
                  speaking of stabs..looking like death (so to speak) by a thousand cuts for HC.
                  unless this is all her tactics, as suggested in another post which does seem feasible.
                  political intrigue up there w/ Mediciis

                  Like

                • Dixie Darling says:

                  I’m convinced Hillary is not well. One also gets the feeling from “Blood Feud” that she refuses to allow Bill to advise her.

                  Like

                • auscitizenmom says:

                  “It’s my turn, and I will do it my way.” I am sure you are right. Looking at the mistakes she is making I think it is clear she won’t listen to Bill.

                  Like

                • czarowniczy says:

                  She didn’t get this far to roll up and bite the pillow, Look at the trail of strange deaths and ruined lives in her/Bill’s past, she’s the female incarnation of Nixon. Even a snake with its head cut off can still bite.

                  Like

    • RJ says:

      Hillary likes to beat up men, always has since her young family days with brothers, etc. Her real problem is deciding whether to run the game of politics or to live within the gilded walls of her foundation. Her team of political generals want her to play politics, as would Bill too, but she is an old, ugly, worn out broad who’s body shows signs of the inner mental fatigue.

      Obama, on the other hand–along with his team, is just hitting his stride in power politics. He dreams of the world stage as his rightful place in time and in history. He will destroy all who get in his way.

      We, the citizens of America will continue to pay a heavy price beyond our treasure, it will be our sons, daughters and their kids whose blood will run red on foreign and perhaps our streets.

      We are the ones who need to wise up and wise up…sooner, rather than later!

      Like

      • czarowniczy says:

        I have no doubt that both of them will be pains in our….sides….for a long, long time. I see Hillary carrying out a number of vendettas, especially if this mess the POtuS seems to have started damages her investiture. BHO, on the other hand, will spend a good part of what time he has remaining wringing $$$ out of whom/whatever he can and carry on a scorched-European policy of a more viscous nature than he is doing now. I do not see him singing the ‘let’s all get together’ song, far from it. Aside from his native repudiation of his European ancestry (I don’t care how they try to reexplain what he wrote, it’s in B&1/2W) he’s going to have the irritation born out of his not being able to re-engineer the country in his Obama-centric image. Stand back America, it’s going to be a bumpy ride.

        Like

    • Murse says:

      The black vote that Obama enjoyed won’t happen again until another black candidate arises, but Obama has set that back for many years because many white voters will recall the tribalism of Obama and project it upon the next black POTUS to be.

      Like

      • czarowniczy says:

        More than a few of the DemocRATic base see the Party as a cargo cult and local political wranglers will be working their magic getting as many of the purchased to the polls as they can. If the past holds it will be harder to pry the faithful out with a non-black candidate in the race. It would be interesting to see what would happen were the Dems to pull a right-of-center black candidate from their ranks, how the local wranglers would play that card – but that’s a slim to impossible happening. I agree that many white DemocRATS will look at the Obama reign as some sort of political Twilight Zone, I’m curious to hear how they’re going to rectify that with their internal beliefs – another slim-to-none happening.

        Like

  34. bofh says:

    I’m thinking that it’s more about longevity than immediate power. Dynasties.
    Think Kennedy’s.
    Think Bush clan.
    Think Clintons.
    Second look at Moochelle? (assuming Barky is willing to leave office.)

    Like

    • doodahdaze says:

      The Clantons, The obamas, I would not be surprised to see moochie in there to get the black vote.

      Like

    • RJ says:

      Will you give me a break on Michelle…look at her mother who has been living in the White House all these years…look at a picture of her…this is where Michelle is going to be in the not too distant future. See the anger in the mother’s face?

      Rage politics…I’m so tired of it all. It’s so destructive.

      Like

    • pspsst says:

      No doubt it has crossed Val Jar’s mind several times over the course of 6 years. VJ is enjoying herself immensely as special consort to them both. She has a close relationship not only to Barry but to his wife. From my perspective, Michelle is no brainiac first lady behind the false Remington Steal, that would be VJ. I’m not certain how receptive the public would be to Michelle who adores Beyonce half her age, but then Islamic sponsors greases the entire political machine.

      Like

  35. chick20112011 says:

    Breaking, KMOV reporting TWO SUSPECTS in custody for the OFFICER SHOOTING

    Per their facebook, conference at 1:30

    Liked by 1 person

  36. nyetneetot says:

    “They believe that Hillary, like her husband, is left of center, not a true-blue liberal.”

    If she gets into the White House, they believe she will compromise with the Republicans in Congress and undo Obama’s legacy.

    I think this may be key BS right here. This is stated not as the true reason motivating the attack, but to make young people left/right of center feel better about Hillary. As in, ‘If Hillary isn’t friends with the current administration, then she must be not as bad….’

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dixie Darling says:

      yes, reverse psychology…..I thought that when I saw that phrase too.

      Liked by 1 person

    • F.D.R. in Hell says:

      That’s a little risky. The Clinton’s would never settle for being slaves working in the fields of Obama’s legacy. Their metaphor, not mine.

      Regarding dynasties, the Kennedys and Bushes go back generations.

      There’s no dynasty behind the Clintons. They are carpetbaggers.
      There’s nothing but a fictional narrative behind the Obamas.

      America has been watching an historic game of Three-Card-Monte for the past six years. She continues to point to the wrong card, over and over and over again. How much longer will this sidewalk street hustle continue? Until winter sets in…nuclear winter.
      😦 👿 😦

      Liked by 3 people

  37. Michael Dixon says:

    The infighting among Democrats is a sideshow, political theater, here today, gone tomorrow. What matters is the big picture: the fate of this nation. Are we content to live in a surveillance/police state – with the real possibility that local police departments will be nationalized and fall under the control of Obama administration – or will we engage in a counter-revolution to restore America as the land of the free that many of us grew up in and took pride in? That America is rapidly becoming history.

    If conservative, constitutional republicans want to reclaim their country they sure as hell better do something while they can still muster some political power. Waiting for the outcome of the 2016 presidential election, and then waiting for the inauguration in January 2017, is taking a frightening risk. If we lose, and we well may lose, it’s over. There won’t be another chance.

    Like

    • F.D.R. in Hell says:

      “Political power” ?? With all due respect, I ask, surely, you’re joking? The concepts of Elections and political power should never be used in the same sentence; they have nothing at all to do with each other. Sadly, the 2014 elections are proof that political power is no longer in the hands of patriotic Americans.

      Like

  38. crazy says:

    Damage control. Protect POTUS. Keep Hillary under control. Keep the fight focused on US – the real enemy. That’s what Val-Jar is up to – not destroying Hillary. Hard as it may be to believe this is the battlefield Obama and Hillary are the most comfortable on. They’d much rather martyr themselves than deal with the issues or the results from their actions. If Val-Jar were out to get Hillary she’d have been gone years ago.

    Like

    • bofh says:

      “If Val-Jar were out to get Hillary she’d have been gone years ago.”

      Hard to argue against that statement.

      Like

      • F.D.R. in Hell says:

        “If Val-Jar were out to get Hillary she’d have been gone years ago.”
        Not true. 🙄

        “Hard to argue against that statement.”
        Not true. 🙄

        Now I know this thread has hit rock bottom; the trolls are home from Sunday brunch.

        Like

    • pspsst says:

      They’d much rather martyr themselves than deal with the issues or the results from their actions.

      S.c.a.r.y but true!

      Worse than a pillow fight, it’s right up the Angelina Jolie Hollywood Walk of Fame, where she claims her children are allowed to totally destroy a rented villa, why, because famous people raise their childen differently. We need a manual of DSM maladjusted just for for these elitist freaks.

      Liked by 1 person

      • MaryfromMarin says:

        Unfortunately, the DSM has been in the process of being scrubbed of pathologies for some time now. Pretty soon, that distinction will cease to exist and all bets will be off.

        Like

  39. eleda says:

    The Walker Wave – Time to Drain the SWAMP!!!!

    Like

  40. yakmaster2 says:

    Lay down with dogs, get up with fleas.

    Like

  41. archer52 says:

    This my friends is going to be fun! The war between the two head “b**hes”- Cheryl Mills for Hillary and Bill, and Val for the Obama legacy and the Iranian regime!

    Val worries Hillary will backtrack- and she will. Mills worries that Obama’s people will finally expose the woman she’s been protecting since 1992 and prevent her from raising to the top.

    Hillary will not gather the democratic votes Obama did. Many voters voted for him because he was the first black President. Selling “you should vote for a woman because it is historic” won’t sell this time since many have learned that lesson. You don’t vote private parts or color. So, Hillary will lose that vote.

    It will be her-

    http://www.nationalreview.com/article/415437/clintons-cover-team-john-fund?target=author&tid=902877

    vs

    her

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/14/ny-post-valerie-jarrett-leaked-hillarys-private-email-use-to-press/

    Let the games begin!

    Like

  42. joshua says:

    Mumblety Peg in Politics. Night of the long pocket knives.

    Like

  43. Truthfilter says:

    More than half of this country now regrets the election of Obama. I can’t think of a better way to solicit support from more than half of the country than to suggest that the Obama camp is afraid that Hillary will undo Obama’s legacy if she becomes president. This is Clintonesque. I don’t like the Clintons —-but they’re not stupid.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s