30,340 First Six Months – List of Sponsor Placements of Unaccompanied Children by State – How does your state rank ?

The application window for HHS grants under the Unaccompanied Alien Children program just closed yesterday. According to the data included in the application the average length of stay for a UAC is 30-35 days prior to unification with a sponsor.

Most (95%+) of the sponsors are relatives of the child.  Most sponsors reunited are the mothers of the children (85%+) who actually brought them along and there is never a disconnect.  All sponsors are subsidized by taxpayers at an average cost of around $4,000 to $6,000 per child/per month. A custodial ‘sponsor’ (mother) with three UAC’s will net about $12,000 per month federal support from the ORR and UAC program(s).

Now that the current UAC grant application window has closed for FY2015, ORR (Office of Refugee Resettlement) has released the data of settlement placement for the first six months of 2014 (Jan-June).   The federal data release matches EXACTLY with the “unofficial” information we have previously discovered  from our own research:

beck 1

(Via HHS.GOV) Once the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) receives a child from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), we have the responsibility to continuously seek placement options in the child’s best interest. This typically involves releasing children to sponsors.

Sponsors are adults who can suitably provide for the child’s physical and mental well-being and have not engaged in any activity that would indicate a potential risk to the child.

{*snip* The majority of sponsors are the parents; usually Mom… /SD} 

We try to place the child with a parent, and if that is not possible, with a relative, and if that is not possible, with a family friend. We do not restrict placements based on the immigration status of the parent or other sponsor.

All sponsors receive a background check that includes a public records name and address check to search for criminal history; review of any criminal history the sponsor self-reports during the reunification process; and through interviews with the child. If the sponsor is not a parent or legal guardian of the child, a fingerprint check is also conducted.

{*snip* few fingerprint checks are done… /SD}

We ensure that children are vaccinated and medically cleared before placing them with a sponsor. We do not release any children who have a contagious condition.

The sponsor is responsible for ensuring the minor’s presence at all future immigration proceedings. They are also responsible for ensuring the minor reports to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for removal from the United States if an immigration judge issues a removal order or voluntary departure order.

{*snip* Few show up for future proceedings – the cash payments are not dependent on compliance… /SD}

If we cannot locate a sponsor, the child will typically remain in ORR care unless the following happens:

•The child goes before the immigration judge and requests a voluntary departure
•A judge orders the child to be deported and DHS repatriates
•The child turns 18, transferring custody back to DHS
•Legal relief, in some form is granted by immigration judge.

{*snip* HHS has said the average stay in non-custodial care is 30-35 days for UAC’s}

The data below shows state-by-state placement of unaccompanied children with sponsors. (ACF will update this data during the first week of each month) January 1, 2014 to July 7, 2014:

Alabama – 407
Alaska – 5
Arizona – 186
Arkansas – 166
California – 3,150
Colorado – 221
CONNECTICUT – 325
DELAWARE – 117
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA – 187
FLORIDA – 3,181
GEORGIA – 1,154
HAWAII – 8
IDAHO – 8
ILLINOIS – 305
INDIANA – 245
IOWA – 122
KANSAS  – 179
KENTUCKY  – 237
LOUISIANA –  1,071
Maine –  8
Maryland –  2,205
Massachusetts –  773
Michigan –  92
Minnesota –  173
Mississippi –  179
Missouri –  121
Montana –  1
Nebraska –  192
Nevada –  122
new Hampshire –  13
new jersey –  1,504
new Mexico –  18
new York –  3,347
north Carolina –  1,191
north Dakota –  4
Ohio –  360
Oklahoma –  212
Oregon –  50
Pennsylvania –  386
Rhode island –  119
south Carolina –  350
south Dakota –  21
Tennessee –  760
Texas –  4,280
Utah –  67
Vermont –  3
Virgin Islands –  4
Virginia –  2,234
Washington –  211
west Virginia –  10
Wisconsin –  50
Wyoming –  6

Total 30,340   (link)

[* Hey, I want to sponsor those 4 UAC’s in the U.S. Virgin Islands.   At $16k/month I’m sure we could find a way to suffer through.  ‘Better than Lotto’ ]  And now we know each of those UAC’s will be legally represented by AmeriCorps attorney’s  - again at U.S. taxpayer expense.  Although, few will actually show up for their immigration hearings.

You see, the actual scam here is that there’s not a crisis of “unaccompanied” minors or children at the border.  Sure there are lots of kids, but they are not alone – they are with mom or dad.   The Feds have created a false “narrative” of unaccompanied children.   The UAC is actually an AAF = “Accompanied Alien Family”.

President Obama and the progressive political ideologues keep saying ‘children’ to advance the unlawful entry as a “humanitarian crisis”, and avoid the illegality of the entire enterprise.

beck 2beck 5

 

Using information within the TAGGS system for Health and Human Services we are able to identify the recipients for Grants specifically designated for “Unaccompanied Alien Children”, or UAC’s.

With that data, a few more search tools, some time and a little more research, we are able to identify the locations of facilities throughout the country where the HHS grants are being directed and the UAC’s are being transferred/housed. There are essentially two broad types: Residence Care, and Transitional to Foster Care Services.

illegal alien 5

From the FY 2014 HHS Grants we can identify the communities where direct HHS UAC funds have been sent. We can identify the specific facility, or the organization supporting the foster care placement. If you live in, or close to, one of the listed cities below, the UAC’s transfers are already in your community.

It should be noted that where possible we have tried to find out the number of children within the agency unit. For some it was easy, some were listed on the grants, for others it was not possible. Some are housed in Juvenile detention camps; some are in hospitals with specifically designated beds and dorms. A large percentage are/were in transitional housing during placement to foster families, and some appear to have gone directly to foster families as the transition to their permanent family takes place.

We have also included the exact amount of the HHS grant for two reasons. Number one, so that you can see how much this is costing you, the taxpayer. However, there is a more valuable secondary reason. We have identified (through extensive research) that each UAC, each individual, is estimated/evaluated at a HHS cost level of around $40,000 per grant (give or take). So if you see a grant for $2,325,000 you can divide by $40k and find out that’s about 58 (people) UAC’s in that facility or process for the quarter (3 month period), or time they are being transitioned/processed in that facility or organization.

illegal alien shipment

2014 Meza Arizona – 1 Facility – New Leaf Inc. Dorothy Mitchell [Residence Facility for UAC] Address: 868 E. UNIVERSITY DRIVE MESA, AZ 85203 HHS Grant $387,936

2014 Irvington, New York – 1 Facility – Abbott House Residential Services [Residential facility for UAC “Unaccompanied Alien Children”] ABBOTT HOUSE 100 N BROADWAY IRVINGTON, NY 105331254 HHS Grant $ 2,983,200

2014 Windsor Mill, Maryland – 1 Facility – BOARD OF CHILD CARE OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, INC [Residential Emergency Housing and Care for UAC’s] Address: 3300 Gaither Road BALTIMORE, MD 21244 HHS Grant $2,387,200

2014 Miami, Florida – 2 (possibly 3) facilities each housing 60 children – CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI INC Address: 9401 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI SHORES, FL 33138-2970 Most recent HHS Grant(s) $1,675,094 and $748,740

2014 Houston, Texas – 2 facilities – St. Michael’s Homes for Children [Residential Housing via CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF GALVESTON-HOUSTON] – Address: 1111 LOVETT BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77006 Most recent HHS Grant(s) $2,792,549 and $1,396,274

2014 Galveston, Texas – 2 facilities – Galveston Multicultural Institute/The Children’s Center [Residential Housing CHILDREN’S CENTER, INC] Address: 2127 AVENUE M GALVESTON, TX 77550 HHS Grants $4,826,682

2014 Valhalla, New York – 1 Facility – Cardinal McCloskey School & Home for Children [Long Term Housing while awaiting Foster Care Program for UAC’s] – Address: 115 Stevens Avenue VALHALLA, NY 105951252 HHS Grants $1,477,330

2014 New York, New York – 1 Facility – Catholic Guardian Services [Looks like a placement service not a facility] Address: 1011 First Avenue NEW YORK, NY 10022 HHS Grants $2,663,492

2014 Clearwater, Florida – 1 Facility – GULF COAST JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES, INC [foster care placement service] Address: 14041 ICOT BLVD CLEARWATER, FL 33760 HHS Grant $958,424

2014 Auburn, New York – 1 Foster Facility – Cayuga Home for Children DBA Cayuga Centers [In-Home Foster Care Services for Unaccompanied Alien Children] Address: 101 Hamilton Ave AUBURN, NY 13021 HHS Grants $8,376,471

2014 Elizabeth, New Jersey – 1 Foster Facility – County of Union New Jersey Department of Human Services [Foster Placement not a facility] address: 10 Elizabethtown Plaza ELIZABETH, NJ 07207 HHS Grants $825,576

2014 La Verne, California – 1 Facility – David & Margaret Youth and Family Services – [Basic Emergency Shelter Services for Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC) Program] 1350 THIRD STREET LA VERNE, CA 91750 HHS Grant $3,750,000

2014 Redmond, Washington – 1 Facility – FRIENDS OF YOUTH [Transitional Living Facility] Address: 16225 NE 87TH A-6 REDMOND, WA 98052-3536 HHS Grant $1,730,955

2014 Fullerton, California – 1 Facility – Florence Crittenton Services of Orange County [Placement Service] Address: 801 E. Chapman Ave., Ste. 230
FULLERTON, CA 92831-3847 HHS Grant $8,172,157

2014 Chicago, Illinois – 1 Facility – HEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SERVICES, INC [Staffed Shelter Facility] Address: 208 SOUTH LASALLE STREET CHICAGO, IL 606041156 HHS Grant $20,809,351

2014 Opa Locka, Florida – 1 Facility – (Miami Dade) His House Inc. [Residential and Long Term Shelter Facility] Address: 20000 NW 47th Avenue MIAMI, FL 33055 HHS Grant $6,514,232

2014 Los Fresnos, Texas – 5 or 6 Facilities – Driscoll Shelter Care Program, Hidalgo Foster Care Specialized Program, Harlingen Foster Care Program, Brownsville Foster Care Program, Emergency Shelter Care Program, INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. Address: P.O. BOX 112 LOS FRESNOS, TX 78566-0112 HHS Grant $55,024,914

2014 Alexandria, Virginia – 1 facility – Juvenile Detention Commission for Northern Virginia [23 Beds -various security levels- Assigned for UAC’s] Address: 200 S. Whiting Street ALEXANDRIA, VA 22304 HHS Grant $1,992,900

2014 Schnecksville, Pennsylvania – 1 facility – KidsPeace National Centers, Inc. [Staffed Shelter Facility] Address: 4085 Independence Drive SCHNECKSVILLE, PA 18078 HHS Grant $6,909,809

2014 Baltimore, Maryland – 1 facility – LUTHERAN IMMIGRATION & REFUGEE SERVICE [Foster Care Placement] Address: 700 LIGHT ST BALTIMORE, MD 21230-3850 HHS Grant $14,957,523

2014 Austin. Texas – 2 facilities – LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTH,INC. [Emergency Shelter and Transitional foster Care] Address: POST OFFICE BOX 49589 AUSTIN, TX 78765 HHS Grant $8,389,270

2014 Mahopac, New York – 1 facility – Lincoln Hall [Temporary “Reunification” Shelter] Address: 145 Lincolndale Road LINCOLNDALE, NY 10541 $12,067,942

2014 New York, New York – 1 facility – Lutheran Family & Community Services [Residential and Foster Care] Address: 308 West 46th Street NEW YORK, NY 10036 HHS Grant $1,858,700

2014 Syosset, New York – 1 facility – Mercy First [Residential Care] Address: 525 Convent Road SYOSSET, NY 11791 HHS Grant $3,773,763

2014 Portland, Oregon – 1 facility – Morrison Child & Family Services [Residential Care] Address: 9911 SE MT SCOTT BLVD PORTLAND, OR 97266 HHS Grant $3,694,729

2014 Daytona Beach, FL – 1 facility – Neighbor to Family [Residential and Transitional Foster Care] Address: 955 Orange Avenue, Ste M DAYTONA BEACH, FL 32114 HHS Grant $2,727,525

2014 Seattle, Washington – 1 facility – Pioneer Human Services [Foster placement] Address: 7440 W. Marginal Way, So. SEATTLE, WA 98108-4141 HHS Grant $2,075,820

2014 Jupiter, Florida – 1 facility – Sandy Pines Hospital [Residential Care] Address: 11301 SE Tequesta Terrace TEQUESTA, FL 33469 HHS Grant $1,384,703

2014 San Antonio, Texas – 1 facility – Seton Home [Residential Housing for Pregnant and Parenting UAC and their Children] Address: 1115 Mission Road SAN ANTONIO, TX 78210 HHS Grant $2,717,801

2014 Staunton, Virginia – 1 facility – Shenandoah Valley Juvenile Detention Home [Residential ORR/DCS Secure and Staff Secure] Address: 300 Technology Drive STAUNTON, VA 24401 HHS Grant $3,282,893

2014 Manvel, Texas – 1 facility – Shiloh Treatment Center, Inc. [Emergency Medical Housing, Treatment and Transition Facility] Address: 3926 Bahler Avenue MANVEL, TX 77578 HHS Grant $5,103,561

2014 San Antonio, Texas – 1 facility – St. Peter St. Joseph Children`s Home [Transitional residential Housing] Address: 919 Mission Road
SAN ANTONIO, TX 78210 HHS Grant $7,086,020

2014 Dobbs Ferry, New York – 1 facility – THE CHILDREN`S VILLAGE INC. [Domicile Care Facility – Longer Term UAC’s] Address: WETMORE HALL, 3RD FLOOR
DOBBS FERRY, NY 10522 HHS Grant $12,525,435

2014 Phoenix, Arizona – 1 facility – TUMBLEWEED CENTER FOR YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC [Residential Shelter and Long Term Foster UAC Care] Address: 1419 NORTH 3RD ST, SUITE 102 PHOENIX, AZ 85004-1639 HHS Grant $1,557,966

2014 Kingston, New York – 1 facility – The Children`s Home of Kingston [Residential Shelter and Long Term UAC Housing] Address: 26 Grove St
KINGSTON, NY 12401 HHS Grant $999,200

2014 Poughkeepsie, New York – 1 facility – The Children`s Home of Poughkeepsie, Inc. [Residential Shelter and Long Term UAC Housing] Address: 10 Children`s Way POUGHKEEPSIE, NY 12601 HHS Grant $775,361

2014 Woodland, California – 1 facility – YOLO COUNTY DEPT OF PROBATION [criminal detention center – Secured UAC Housing] Address: 2780 E. Gibson Road WOODLAND, CA 95776 HHS Grant $1,682,520

2014 Seattle, Washington – 1 facility – YOUTH CARE [Youth Homeless Shelter – “House of Friends Program” Long Term UAC Housing] Address: 2500 NE 54TH ST, SUITE 100 SEATTLE, WA 98105 HHS Grant $1,182,183

2014 Bristow, Virginia – 1 facility – Youth For Tomorrow [Residential Shelter UAC Program ] Address: 11835 Hazel Circle Drive BRISTOW, VA 20136 HHS Grant $8,314,702

~ The Three Corp Entities Below Are Receiving Grants and Using Sub Contractors ~

BRONZE MEMBER ♦ 2014 Washington DCnumerous facilities – Corporate office Facility for U.S. CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS [Working similar to BCFS structure throughout the U.S. No specific residence use available – “Safe Passages Program”] Corp Address: 3211 4TH ST, NE WASHINGTON, DC 20017-1106 HHS Grant $6,761,412

SILVER MEMBER ♦ 2014 Austin, Texas*Numerous Facilities* SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS, INC. [This is a large entity like BCFS – Emergency Shelter(?)] Address: 3000 I-H 35, SUITE 410 AUSTIN, TX 78704 HHS Grant $26,822,183 and $95,462,917

kevin dinninGOLD MEMBER ♦ 2014 San Antonio Texasnumerous facilitiesBaptist Child & Family Services – HHS and BCFS EMD (Emergency Management Division) Corporate office Address: 909 NE Loop 410 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78209 HHS Grant $280,156,954 !!

[BCFS-EMD is the single largest facilitator of UAC transition throughout the U.S. – specific housing locales unknown] However, we do know as a result of the $190 million grant BCFS received just before the 7/9/14 Dallas meeting with President Obama they plan massive expansion. (Press Release )

BCFS now operates regional offices in San Antonio, Miami, Los Angeles-area and Houston-area. We have outlined the massive construct behind BCFS HERE and HERE including their 2012 tax documents and the detail of the Dallas visit with the Obama administration. BCFS-EMD is bigger than ACORN was.

The facilities, organizations and entities above all received HHS grants to care for UAC’s. However, some of those organizations may have further sub contracted the actual housing (example BCFS).

Because HHS is not directly paying the sub contractor (grant funds) the sub will not appear on the TAGGS system. Consequently some of the facilities actually housing the UAC’s will not have been listed – only the entities being given $$ directly from HHS.

Some of the facilities above might be included in this map which has been assembled based on “ground reports” and “media reports” of UAC transfers.

However, many of the facilities listed above will not be on this map. Many of the recipients for the HHS grants -government dependent non profits- have quietly put the UAC’s into their community facility, or foster program. Subsequently the community might not even be aware of it. So both the interactive MAP and the above list should be referenced if you are researching your community:

7-16-14 map

CLICK HERE TO GO INTERACTIVE

The methodology to update your own research is time consuming but possible with a few bits of information.

The internal HHS coding for Federal Grants related to Unaccompanied Alien Children is #93676. The types of grants (there are thousands) are numerically listed in the HHS TAGGS tracking system.

There is a search function which you can use to identify UAC Grants by Zip code, Date, Award or Recipient. The most useful tool for starters is the Award Search knowing 93676 is the code for UAC Grants (it’s 2/3rds of the way down the drop menu).

You can use a reverse Zip Code Search Engine (like this one) If you are unsure of a location of a facility. Once you have identified the facility you check their “profit status”. If they are an NPO (non profit organization) you can look up their tax records in the state of their filing. That will give you details on the type of facility they are and their business context. You can also find out their organizational structure and their other business interests etc.

You can also see their other governmental business and what additional funding they receive from the tax payers. With this information you can get almost everything you need to pick up the phone and ask specific questions.

Here is an example of a non profit using BCFS Tax Filings for 2012:

From the looks of things, this is not going to stop any time soon…

BCFS 2014

illegal alien 10

Don’t forget the timeline of the BORDER CRISIS – CLICK HERE

Border stats

Even the Washington Post is CATCHING ON !

About these ads
This entry was posted in Christian Values, Conspiracy ?, Cultural Marxism, Dear Leader - Creepy POTUS Worship, Dem Hypocrisy, Election 2014, Illegal Aliens, media bias, Mexico, Notorious Liars, Obama re-election, Operation Brown Dream, Political correctness/cultural marxism, propaganda, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

55 Responses to 30,340 First Six Months – List of Sponsor Placements of Unaccompanied Children by State – How does your state rank ?

  1. stella says:

    Few show up for future proceedings – the cash payments are not dependent on compliance… /SD

    Why the HELL not? They have the contact to send a check/remit funds – should also be used to enforce compliance.

    Like

    • sundance says:

      Stella, it would be illegal to withhold financial benefit based on immigration status. Disparate impact.

      Like

      • stella says:

        Too bad you aren’t being sarcastic.

        Like

      • waltherppk says:

        Hey you know “pity scam” criminal racketeers are people too and need money just like everybody else. So they are certainly qualified, entitled really, for some taxpayer assistance in their dishonest effort to defraud the taxpayer.

        It wouldn’t be charitable towards the poor children to deny them such tribute, especially when they aren’t white and would be disparately impacted compared with children of white taxpayers. We all know how unfair disparate impact is to people of color. So we can’t have none of that disparate impact stuff adversely affecting Eric Holder’s and Obama’s “special” non-white people because (of course) that would be racist, and work against the social justice affirmative action official policy supporting preferential treatment of non-white people as a reparation for any actual or imagined historical wrongs.

        White devils are surely getting some righteous payback for what just maybe their great great great grandaddy maybe did wrong or maybe did not have any kind of involvement, but died a hundred years ago without paying his fair share for a debt nobody even knows exists. And clearly that is just plain wrong.

        So naturally that possible injustice nobody knows for sure ever existed, is now taken for granted is an inherited debt for the third or fourth generation white people living now. There is evidently no statute of limitations on reparations from white people for those people of color who imagine they are owed something today for business they don’t like from three or more generations earlier

        So we have an ex post facto bill of attainder type of unconstitutional and legally prohibited type of penalty applied as policy to all white people for what amounts to an unprovable ancestral liability for activity which was for the ancestor living in the time no crime at all nor subject to any liability whatever.

        There is some really convoluted legal theory that holds accountable those not yet born for a couple of generations, liable for the past lawful acts of their long dead ancestors.

        Like

  2. yadent says:

    I assume it’s not ‘aiding and abetting’ if the government is involved. I guess I’ll have to apologize to all of the inmates I’ve dealt with who are doing time for same ‘aiding and abetting’. I guess that would include the ‘coyotes’ too. If only my uncle and cousin had been employed by the Federal Government they wouldn’t have served time for ‘transporting undocumented across US borders’. They were before their time…………

    Like

  3. Sharon says:

    Lawlessness is now the norm and the consequences are going to manifest exponentially at some point, with acceleration. When that happens I’m thinking the only useful response will be local and immediate – something that changes what’s happening on the ground within 2-10 hours. I wonder if the internetz will stay up. I suppose it depends on how tough the kittehs in the tubes are.

    Like

  4. kpm58 says:

    4k per head per month. BGI heads are going to pop when they here this.

    Like

    • waltherppk says:

      Can I be a foster parent to a poor hispanic child too? ….Oh wait, silly question …I’m a caucasian so I’m not really qualified or entitled….what was I thinking about getting some of that easy money doled out by the taxpayer givers to the takers. I’m too white to qualify.

      Like

      • raybbr says:

        You’ll notice a good percentage are accompanied by their own parent which means that a family of four will get $16k a month AND be relocated at no expense to them. I am roaring angry at this deliberate cancerous infusion of welfare mongrels into my country.

        Like

  5. doodahdaze says:

    It is a vast hard left conspiracy. So vast it is impossible to fathom. I mean really vast.

    Like

  6. Renee says:

    Do we have proof of the $4000 to $6000 per month per child figure? I only know of the one report that said up to $6000 per child per month. Is there coroborating evidence somewhere else?
    This is insanity. If true it would be a huge incentive for illegals to come here no matter the cost. You will never stop it. As soon as they start getting the checks (probably already have) they would broadcast the fact far and wide. Ugh!

    Like

      • I just looked at the link, and was shocked at the total figures, but was too dumb to see the clear link to the $4k per child housed by their own parents. This would be great ammo for us to use against the left and to get our congress critters to do something, Is there a way you can break it down some more? You have done a great job in bringing this to the public’s attention.

        Like

    • waltherppk says:

      How much percentage of that grant money has to be kicked back as a bribe, er I mean gratuity, to the grantor who authorizes the grant? What is the congress person’s cut owed them for their part in the scam?

      Like

    • Renee says:

      Another thought. If it is true that the illegals are getting or will get monthly checks, you can bet most of that money will go south to support family left behind as it does now in mexico. We have all read that most of the money goes south. Again, ugh!

      Like

      • sundance says:

        Yes. That’s been previously discussed, documented and shared.

        The illegal immigrant is not paying the “mule” to transport them to the U.S. border…. WE ARE. Two ways:

        • First by sending them IRS refund checks ($1,000 per dependent) in their home country.
        • Second, approximately 1/2 of the welfare entitlement is sent back to their home country.

        Team Obama Inc have it set up so that U.S. Taxpayers are the financier’s for the entire “crisis”. Pretty good trick no?

        Like

  7. John Galt says:

    $6,000 per month @ 10 per acre would be a huge cash crop. Pinto beans and rice are cheap.

    Like

  8. Dean G says:

    “Most sponsors reunited are the mothers of the children (85%+) who actually brought them along and there is never a disconnect. All sponsors are subsidized by taxpayers at an average cost of around $4,000 to $6,000 per child/per month. A custodial ‘sponsor’ (mother) with three UAC’s will net about $12,000 per month federal support from the ORR and UAC program(s).”

    At the risk of sounding ignorant, I have a question about this paragraph. Does this mean that the illegal alien mother/parent who brought their child(ren) with them across the border is counted as a ‘sponsor’ for their own child and will receive cash payouts from the U.S. Government? The government sees the illegal alien parent as providing some sort of foster care for their own child? Please say it ain’t so.

    How can the child even be declared ‘unaccompanied’ in the first place if they are crossing with a parent/guardian or have a parent/guardian already residing within the U.S.?

    Like

  9. waltherppk says:

    (stated illegal alien child placement and de facto sanctuary / amnesty policy) We do not restrict placements based on the immigration status of the parent or other sponsor.

    Birds of a feather flock together. Most of the illegals are being brought here by other illegals already here. And this scam is being operated and financed by fraudulently obtained and/or misappropriated taxpayer dollars. This is brazen racketeering and graft and corruption and fraud being administered by the government itself, exploiting a problem that the government created in the first place by not enforcing the existing laws.

    Like

    • ytz4mee says:

      It has been pointed out to me, quite succinctly, by someone who works “Refugee” situations for an NGO, that there are already protocols in place to deal with migrant populations.

      The UN has an office dedicated to monitoring the “pre-warning” signs of potential refugees outflows from a region. Huge dollars are spent by western countries to fund these regional operations and staffs.

      When refugees begin streaming out of an area, the protocol is to have the UN set up an in-country or near-country “safety zone” where the refugees can be assessed, given medical care, basic food and shelter, etc until their in-country situation stabilizes and/or a political solution to the in-country turmoil is found/brokered.

      This is the protocol for the rest of the world, and it has been in place for decades. Encouraging mass migration FROM a specific region is against this protocol.

      SO … the Obots love them some UN and are forever blathering on how the US needs to submit to UN control/ideology/treaties (pick a meme)…. What are they specifically ignoring/flouting/rejecting standard UN protocol for these exact situations???

      Hmmmmmm………..

      Like

  10. justfactsplz says:

    When the welfare class in the U.S. ever get the drift about how much these illegals are making in money, homes, food stamps, medical care, phones, etc. it will really hit the fan. If the illegals have very many children (which most of them do) they will be making more money than many hard working Americans do. The hard working Americans don’t qualify for extra help either like the illegals get on top of the money.

    Like

  11. labrat says:

    Can you make out what this guy is using for a source?

    Like

  12. tc says:

    It seem like we’d all be better off if we crossed the border, gave up our US citizenship and came back as dreamers, and I’m only half joking.

    Like

    • waltherppk says:

      Becoming a volunteer refugee would be an upward mobility career decision for many American citizens as the easiest way to immediately improve cash flow into the family budget. Are refugees being provided with a company car and a driver of course, housing allowance, clothing allowance, and expense account? Or are those perks covered by the one payment? It appears now that prequalified refugees who meet the recruiting requirements will be selected by administrative process while still residing in their home countries, and then provided transportation directly so that they don’t have to do so much walking and endure a long stressful journey to come collect their grant as payment they are due for not being born white.

      Like

  13. BertDilbert says:

    “All sponsors are subsidized by taxpayers at an average cost of around $4,000 to $6,000 per child/per month. A custodial ‘sponsor’ (mother) with three UAC’s will net about $12,000 per month federal support from the ORR and UAC program(s).”

    At those rates the states will be clamoring for more children and view this as an economic stimulus package.

    Like

  14. michellc says:

    Such a new great country we live in. We citizens must obey the law or we pay the price, yet government agencies can ignore the law as in this case aid and abet illegals and face no consequence. The illegals face no consequence and instead get big fat checks from our government for more than the average hard working family can possibly earn.

    It’s only going to get worse, much worse than I think we even imagined.

    Like

  15. ytz4mee says:

    Another breakdown on the cost to Virginia taxpayers for the UAC’s dumped at Youth For Tomorrow (YFT) in Bristow, VA:

    http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2014/07/24/estimating-the-cost-of-uacs-in-virginia/

    ADD: It appears that the grant monies to YFT (which both state and federal monies are in excess of $16 M), is an illegal appropriation in Virginia. Which is another reason why all of this is being down in the shadows. It’s against the law.

    http://virginiavirtucon.wordpress.com/2014/07/24/corey-stewarts-next-big-lie-on-yft-uacs/

    Like

    • sundance says:

      In the first link I’m not sure where he gets the idea – the sponsors “eligibility status” is supposed to be checked – comes from. The direct information from HHS disputes that position:

      http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/orr/programs/ucs/state-by-state-uc-placed-sponsors

      Like

      • ytz4mee says:

        That is what our local politricksters are telling the citizenry to soothe any upset feelers. Move along now, there’s nothing to see behind that curtain…..

        Like

      • ytz4mee says:

        Add: They’re rolling out the razzle dazzle but no one – I mean no one – is buying the Brooklyn Bridge they’re selling: (and this program locally has been operating under the radar FOR TWO YEARS!)

        John S Gray CPA said on 24 Jul 2014 at 2:49 pm:
        Flag comment

        YFT responded to the County’s FOIA request and among other assurances, YFT stated that:

        1. They’ve participated in the UAC program since June, 2012. Two years! And nobody, not one person in County government was remotely aware of this? Are we to believe that in their quarterly meeting with the Chief of Police, it was never disclosed that UAC’s were being housed there?
        2. In those two years, YTD aid there were no runaways and no issues involving contagious illnesses. Really? Not one incident? Its very easy to check the Call for Services records of the County. Interesting they didn’t report any instances of abuse as the State Dept. of Social Services has at least four investigations into alleged sexual abuse.

        3. No local, state or Medicaid funds are being used to support these UACs. Isn’t that special! I don’t believe one word of that. Oh really?

        4. All these UAC’s attend school at the YFT facility. None go or will go to PWC schools.

        YFT has essentially changed its mission from a publicly supported charity to provide needed services for At-Risk teenagers, a laudable goal, to one in which it receives federal funds to provide basically a detention facility to illegal immigrants. Why should they retain the real estate tax exemption on their multi-acre land holdings? Don’t tell me PWC taxpayers aren’t subsidizing this function. And when it happens and public safety officers are called to the facility, don’t tell me YFT is going to reimburse the County for those costs.

        Two frigging years YFT has operated this program and nobody knew. Politely stated: boulder-dash.

        Like

  16. Mist'ears Mom says:

    I thought I had read that the payments to sponsors of the ‘relocated aliens’ was around $900/mth per person/child per month up to a maximum of $6000. Meaning you would have to house/sponsor 6-7 people to get the 6K per month. $6K/mth per person isn’t realistic even with our messed up gov. $900/mth is too much to be giving them IMO but is more in line with welfare compensation and all the other freebies they will get. That money is for the sponsor to house, feed and clothe them (I am assuming) while they waiting for their hearings.

    Like

    • sundance says:

      Earlier when I was reviewing something on the HHS site $900 was the immediate emergency cash disbursement upon arrival. Everyone who went through the DHS/HHS initial screening rec’d a cash/debit EBT card pre loaded with $900 for initial expenses.

      Like

    • lovemygirl says:

      How can my child get $900 / Month? I’ll kick her out of the country and then take her back if that is how it is done.

      Like

      • waltherppk says:

        So …you will have your child establish a new identity and citizenship in another country like maybe Ireland or Holland and then return later maybe as a foreign student / refugee from oppression? Wait, maybe different countries would better fit the sob story for an asylum seeking refugee. I know, maybe Indonesia or Honduras would work better. In addition to the grant money, she could probably even become a community organizer and run for president if her phony credentials and sob story are persuasive enough. Sadly, none of this will work if she is white, because everybody will be onto the scam in a second. No white inerloper pretenders are allowed. But if the child is biracial or non white the plan should work fine. Obviously having non-white ancestry and ethnicity is really important as a prerequisite authenticating the child is qualified to perpetrate such a scam, I mean qualified to receive humanitarian aid. Being properly non-white racially qualified is simply essential for such a scam, er I mean receiving a generous grant for humanitarian aid to succeed, because if the person is white then they are obviously unqualified and SOL.

        Like

  17. Mist'ears Mom says:

    Sundance, this is what I read from a link on an earlier post. On July 10, on benswann.com:

    “Benswann.com called Crittenton FFA, which is located in Orange County and provides services for Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services, and found that for those willing to a take in a child under the age of 16, you can receive up to $854.00 tax free per month. For those taking in a child over 16, the total is $1,008.00 per month in reimbursement. If you have a 5 bedroom house and can take in as many as 6 children, you can receive reimbursement of up to $6,054.00 per month tax free.”

    “We questioned the person on the line about the requirements for those who would sign up. Any applicant must pass a criminal background check and take 4 classes, the next of which will be two days from now. As for who is paying for all of this? We were told that for normal foster services, the reimbursement is provided by a series of state and local grants but in the case of the “unaccompanied refugee minors”, 100% of the reimbursement will come from the federal government.”
    “According to the ad, if all goes well, families will be able to begin housing children for that tax free money within 45 days.”
    Crittenton is on the above list. If we are paying someone $6K /person/mth the money would not last long. People would be killing each other to get access to that kind of money. Still $854/mth per person is a lot considering you can put 4 to 6 in a room. For these non-profits it is a windfall because it doesn’t cost close to this to take care of these illegal aliens,

    Like

  18. ytz4mee says:

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/24/Illegals-Comprise-10-of-Several-New-York-High-Schools-as-State-Braces-for-at-Least-7K-More

    NYC wants America to know that they’ll need more money to deal with this “moral” issue. Pony up, everyone. Dig deep.

    Like

  19. Yakmaster says:

    I am astonished that tax -free social services payments are automatically given to mothers (deceptively labeled as “sponsors”) to take care of THEIR OWN CHILDREN. That’s an end run around laws that make illegals ineligble for govt. assistance! Same for the free housing. W hen these parents arrive here with their kids they are given money immediately and will be provided money for the kid they brought with them and THEIR FUTURE CHILDREN, who will be automatic citizens. Free ride from day one. We will support them until their kids are over the age of 18 and by that time they will have legal status and go on welfare assistance themselves ( many of them). Entitlements are going to break this country if this keeps happening, but the illegals here are not even grateful! THEY FEEL THE UNITED STATES OWES THEM. I also think many of them feel morally superior because our leaders, churches, and charity groups stress the need for taxpayers to give, but don’t stress the need for illegals to give back to this country—maybe because most of them don’t have the education/skills to contribute and not much incentive to acquire them!!

    Like

    • Yakmaster says:

      PS. Thank you, SD for the meticulous research included in your article. I am dismayed by NC’s high number of placements, but we have a growing Latino/Hispanic community. I posted that info on my FB page so parents and teachers will know it’s just started and we’re gonna need more spanish speaking teachers!

      Like

  20. ctdar says:

    My son is working at a large home improvement store again for the summer. He took 3 years of Spanish & some French so never had issue understanding the occasional question in another language. He mentioned to me yesterday that this summer he has never has some many questions or related problems from people speaking in broken Spanish or some in a language he has never heard.
    So just imagine people that cant get their thoughts formulated enough in English or Spanish are out driving on our streets in all likelihood not understanding the written word either.
    For all law abiding citizens, drive defensively at all times, don’t assume the other out there sharing your space are going to follow the rules of a State or Federal road.

    Like

  21. ihatestatists says:

    To those who want amnesty and free immigration: HOW
    MANY IMMIGRANTS WILL BE ENOUGH? 50 million? 100 million? 200 million?

    The United States is already the 3rd largest nation by population in
    the World. We are no longer a “New World” nation in need of immigrants. Our
    cities are full and dying. Our Children are not finding jobs now… you want
    more competition for them?

    Our population is already pushing up
    prices…with more immigrants the cost of living will be higher and wages will
    be lower.

    If you support amnesty you are not only betraying your
    country you are betraying your own family.

    Like

  22. carterzest says:

    Reblogged this on carterzest and commented:
    This is not moonbatery. This is a vast hard left conspiracy. All working according to a plan. The main goal is turning undocumented democrats in to registered democrat votes. There can be no other explanation of the lunacy. There are 11 million democrat votes at stake. Enough to turn every Presidential Election in the future. Underlapping it all is the path to a certificate of citizenship.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s