The official narrative, of course, is that “violence”, and especially “gun violence” is the provence of  “Angry White Male Conservative Christians”.  This is a meme the Prog-enthralled media repeat over and over again. Wash, lather, rinse, repeat.
So, let’s do a little recap, shall we?
In March of 2008, conservative columnist and commenter Michelle Malkin did an admirable job highlighting the long history of “anti-War”, “anti-Military” acts of violence (in most examples, specifically targeting military recruiters working in the civilian community) intended to inflict terror which specifically had its genesis in the far Left.


In 2010, I wrote about my own first hand experiences with Code Pink and their dishonesty picketing the Private Bolio gate at the Defense Language Institute in Monterey, California as well as the violence with the intent to terrorize committed against myself and my children when we had to cross a gauntlet of Leftist protestors blocking the roadway on the way to the Walter Reed Army Hospital in Washington, DC.  Like Malkin, I received voluminous comments and e-mails alleging I was a “liar” and the incidents never took place.
Fast forward to the Golden Age of Obama, which began in the 2008 campaign cycle. The creators of mayhem and violence – still emanating from the far Left and with greater specificity, those of Progressive/Totalarian ideology – shifted their expressions of rage from merely throwing feces, paint and planting car bombs to an escalated level of violence that resulted in deaths and grave lifetime injury for the survivors.

In the still-unsolved Times Square car bombing, in what would develop into a predictable – yet alarming – pattern, even though video surveillance of an individual on a bicycle involved in the car bombing was available, curiously, the New York Times suddenly became very disinterested in pursuing the story further, let alone revealing any details about the gender, prospective ethnicity or age of the suspect.  Can you imagine any such lack of follow-up interest in any story that involves, potentially, a “White Christian Male” ??
Let’s examine the recent acts of violence committed against military installations and/or military personnel since the deliberately divisive 2008 campaign to see if the template fits the meme that the Progressive media continues to advance and assume:  those who commit violence, and specifically, “gun violence”, in the military shootings have five key descriptors:  Angry, White, Conservative, Christian and Male (AWCCM):
(Nota Bene: This meme began in earnest during the Beltway Sniper episode, which resulted in the unnecessary deaths of even more people, but that’s another post for another day…..)
June 1, 2009 ~ Little Rock, AK Military Recruiting Center in the civilian community
Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad opened fire on a military recruiting center killing one Army private, and wounding another.
AWCCM?  Nope, don’t think so.  Media meme fail.
 
November 29, 2009 ~ Fort Hood, TX US Army Base
Army Maj. Nidal Hasan opened fire in a deadly rampage more than four years ago, killing 13 unarmed people and seriously wounding more than 30.  In spite of numerous warning signs about his fealty and admiration for Jihad and radical Islam, not only was Hasan not removed from active duty, he was actively promoted and coddled.  Most shockingly, US Army General Casey took to the news to insensitively proclaim that the most important aspect of the incident was that the military not lose its emphasis on maintaining “diversity”.

AWCCM?  Nope.  Again, media meme fail.
 
Fall of 2010 ~ various locations throughout the Beltway area of Northern Virginia
Ex-Marine Yonathan Melaku of Alexandria, Virginia pleaded guilty to a series of shootings in 2010, including at the Marine Corps museum in Quantico and military recruiting stations. No one was injured. He was later judged to be schizophrenic and accepted a 25 year sentence plea bargain.
AWCCM?  Not by my count.
 
March 21, 2013 ~ Marine Corps Combat Development Command, Quantico, VA
Sgt. Eusebio Lopez, a tactics instructor at the Officer Candidate School shot two of his colleagues to death in a purported love triangle murder/suicide revenge shooting ending when he killed himself inside the barracks at the Marine Corps base in Quantico.
Keeping track?  How are we doing here?  How many AWCCM’s are we up to, now?
For the purposes of this survey and examination of the validity of the meme, Lopez is not “White” by their standards (until he is, but that is another story for another day….)
 
September 16th, 2013 ~ Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC
Aaron Alexis, a black 34-year-old former Navy reservist and affirmative action hire defense contractor killed 12 people mainly by firing from a balcony, and then died after a gun battle with police.  Tellingly,  most of the law enforcement on post were not armed and the local Capitol police were waived off from assisting in the crisis.
Oh.  I already cheated and mentioned that he was black and not the stereotyped AWCCM.
Sorry.
March 24th, 2014 ~ USS Mahan, docked at the US Naval base, Norfolk, VA
Jeffrey Tyrone Savage shot to death a military police officer after boarding the USS Mahan. Savage, a civilian truck driver by trade, had at least two prior felony convictions, one of which was for manslaughter, was killed by a security officer during the incident.
Unless there’s some weird reverse vitiligo going on, I’m not seeing an AWCCM in this scenario.
 
April 2nd, 2014 ~ Fort Hood US Army Base, TX
Spc Ivan Lopez is alleged to be the shooter that took the lives of three and gravely injured, as of today’s reporting, at least 16.  Several news outlets have released his name and identified him as a member of the Puerto Rican National Guard, even though the military has not officially confirmed his identity, nor released his name or any photographs of him.
For the purposes of the survey, I am counting Puerto Rican Lopez as “not white” in the context of the media template – although, as we have seen previously, depending on how the story evolves, he may magically morph into a “White Hispanic”.
So — how many “Angry, White, Conservative, Christian Men” did you count in our grim survey?
Just pointing this out will have the Race Baiters circling and pouncing (note to fellow Admins:  I’m sorry – so sorry – for the hate tsunami that is about to hit us….)
So, why?  Why would I bring that type of attention to our little campfire, simply to point out the obvious and the blatant media lies?
Several reasons.
1.  It’s important to address the truth, even when it’s not politically expedient and most definitely when it’s not politically correct and goes against the “consensus” of the far Left.
The Left continues to Alinsky-ize us, and we let them.  It. Has. To. Stop.
2.  It’s equally important to not only fight the BGI on their own race-baiting/disparate impact turf, but to push back against the advancement of the meme that white men are scary, dangerous and deserve to be castigated and demonized.  None of this has any basis in reality.  Refusing to point this out, at the risk of being labeled a “racist” and a “hater” is cowardice of the highest order.
It is time we collectively stood up for at least 30% of the population of the USA and reject the agenda to excoriate, demoralize and metaphorically scarify the men who are key and irreplaceable vertebrae in the backbone of America.  Without “White Males”, there is no Western Civilization as we know it.  Full Stop.
The media is already “reporting” that most of these offenders were “mentally ill” veterans while ignoring that their demographic does not match the meme repeated endlessly by the Left.
Leaving the “reason” to be “explained away” by the media is simply not acceptable.  We have to puzzle it out ourselves and be honest about our findings.
3.  It will force us to ask “why” did the domestic military-specific violence shift from far-Left reality-challenged harridans and fellow traveller loons to non-white minority males of various backgrounds and ethnicities in the same time frame as the violence shifted from the (mostly) theatrical and headline-seeking for dramatic effect to the deadly and profoundly dangerous?
Part of the answer can be found, I genuinely believe, in the vitrolic rhetoric both Michelle and Barack Obama initiated on the campaign trail in 2008, and continued throughout his administration, picked up and amplified by his coterie – most ardently by Eric Holder.
White men are dangerous.  White men are evil.  White men are the reason you have been denied _____.  White men created the system that denies you full access to the “American Dream”.
Any reasonable person can see that this is nonsense, and the facts don’t support the race and gender-baiting hyperbole.
However, it allows visible minorities to rally around a “common enemy” (one of the oldest political “divide and conquer” tricks in the book) and to project their own perceived feelings of failure and inadequacy in these challenging times for everyone on the strawman/bogeyman helpfully set up (for KnockOutAssaulting) by the leadership of the Fabian power structure – in front of, and behind, the Curtain.
Not confronting this reality head on, and with steadfast firmness, means that Whites will concede to their own cultural and physical dissolution and submit as Dhimmis to the rising visible minority-majority throughout the West.  There is nothing “fair” or “equal” about advancing false memes that specifically target a demographic to “isolate, marginalize and ridicule” – just the opposite – the advancement of the strategy creates a dangerous and socially poisonous milieu for all who live in the society – not just the targeted AWCCM.