
Rebekah and Robert Mercer reply:
…“If Mr. Trump had told Billy Bush, whoever that is, earlier this year that he was for open borders, open trade, and executive actions in pursuit of gun control, we would certainly be rethinking our support for him.
If he had admitted to Mr. Bush that he had profited privately by allowing the sale to Russia of 20% of US uranium deposits or that he had amassed his personal fortune not by hard work in the private sector but by selling favors to foreigners on the American taxpayers’ dime, we would certainly be rethinking our support for him.
If he had argued that he needed both a public and a private position on issues facing the American public, we would certainly be rethinking our support for him. And finally if Trump had serially terrorized and silenced the victims of violent sexual assault whom he feared could damage his political career, we would most definitely be rethinking our support for him.
(more…)
John Podesta was Bill Clinton’s former Chief of Staff and long-term member of the Clinton inner circle. Today WikiLeaks has dropped a database file of over 2,000+ emails from Podesta to Hillary Clinton and various operatives within the Clinton team.


Here’s The Link to the Data File
Use the comment section to draw attention to anything you find of particular interest.
Have fun reading. Example:
“My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere”.
~ Hillary Clinton
The attacks against the Donald Trump candidacy will not stop. The various constructs of the professional political class, the UniParty, Wall Street, DC, K-Street and the entire apparatus of the corporate media complex have no alternative.

Donald Trump will always remain as the existential threat to their entire financial and ideological construct.
Those who oppose Donald Trump’s candidacy are holding a no retreat position. There is no middle ground. If Hillary Clinton is defeated, all those mentioned entities lose. There are trillions of dollars at stake. The entire life’s work of major leftist organizations will be destroyed. It really is that simple.
If you are waiting for all of those oppositional forces to stop lying, scheming, falsifying, manipulating and gaslighting – stop waiting; they will never cease. Period.
(more…)
It would appear the New York Times had no reason to violate federal law and print candidate Donald Trump’s 1995 tax return after all. In 1995 the Times specifically wrote about the collapse of the real-estate financial markets, and called Donald Trump:
“The Comeback King“…
October 25th 1995 New York Times – Crowning the Comeback King – Though there are still four years to go in the 90’s, business and government leaders in New York honored Donald J. Trump yesterday for pulling off what they called “the comeback of the decade.”
Mr. Trump, the developer who came to epitomize opulent wealth during the 80’s before tumbling into deep financial trouble, has managed to erase much of his debt and is moving ahead with major projects at a time other developers are idling.
Judging from the attention showered on him yesterday at the Union League Club, some of New York’s civic and business leaders are quite captivated by Mr. Trump, despite the financial uncertainties that still surround some of his properties. (more…)
A brave, young, beautifully deplorable woman, who fled a Muslim marriage in Kuwait, opens up about her support for Donald Trump and Milo while deconstructing western feminism and Islam apologists. (Salty Language Alert)
(more…)
With all the MSM banter about taxes today in the headlines, here’s a report that was conveniently dismissed by the same pearl-clutching media. In April 2015 Reuters reported on Hillary Clinton’s family charities falsifying tax filings to the IRS and not reporting donations from foreign governments...
(Reuters) Hillary Clinton’s family’s charities are refiling at least five annual tax returns after a Reuters review found errors in how they reported donations from governments, and said they may audit other Clinton Foundation returns in case of other errors.

[…] The charities’ errors generally take the form of under-reporting or over-reporting, by millions of dollars, donations from foreign governments, or in other instances omitting to break out government donations entirely when reporting revenue, the charities confirmed to Reuters. (more…)
The New York Times has published part of the tax returns of a private citizen in an effort to score political points for a candidate they endorse, Hillary Clinton. That should be the real headline people pause and think about.
The front pages of the tax returns themselves are essentially a non-issue, representing the 1995 gross business loss incurred by candidate Donald Trump who operates a massive conglomeration of business entities.
The anti-Trump political angle is easily identifiable within the extensive article use of: “could have”, “might be”, “may have”, phrases used throughout the woven narrative. Journalistic “narratives” are rarely based on facts.
The identified $916 million single year operating income loss is no different than current losses of Amazon, Facebook, Twitter and a host of other corporations and businesses.
Actually, Donald Trump’s 1995 loss is smaller than the operating loss the New York Times reported when it sold the Boston Globe in 2013 for a net loss of $1.03 billion.
The Times purchased the Boston Globe in ’93 for $1.1 billion and sold it in 2013 for $70 million, a loss of $1.03 billion. However, for some reason it’s doubtful the Times will publish their own 2013 tax returns. That doesn’t meet the political need.
(more…)
The Clinton team are up to their old tricks again. The last time they were in a position of power in DC they spray painted the interior of the White House. This time they’re spray painting the brand new historic landmark Trump International Hotel:
If you find your business in a similar situation, know that the pressure washer guide by ToolsMaestro covers graffiti removal.
When considering how Bill and Hillary Clinton regard the office of the presidency, a new generation of voters may not even know what they did in 2000:
♦ writing vulgar messages on the White House office walls, ♦ destroying furniture, ♦ slicing chair cushions, ♦ ripping phones out of walls, ♦ removing the historic antique door knobs, ♦ cutting all the electronic cabling ♦ stealing items (lots of stuff), ♦ switching around the fax machines and location addressed telephones, ♦ gluing desk drawers closed, ♦ carving into desk tops ♦ removing the “w” key from all the computer keyboards, ♦ spray painting the walls, and much worse.
All of the prior damage caused by team Clinton is well documented and outlined below in a 200+ page General Accounting Office (GAO) report: (more…)
It is always rather ironic how the mighty enlightened, limo-liberal, progressively-minded people can’t see the inevitable conclusions of their ideological and culturally Marxist arguments. If it didn’t effect all of us, it would be somewhat humorous to point their insufferable hypocrisies back at them.
Oh well. At least in this story they were not baking a cake….

COTO DE CAZA, Calif. — A Southern California woman said she is the victim of discrimination, CBS Los Angeles reports.
Mary Campos said her pre-booked ticket was given away by United Airlines. The reason? She’s a woman, and two men didn’t want to sit next to a female.
A million-mile flier, Campos, a mom who lives in Coto de Caza, said she thought she’d seen it all – until a gate agent handed her a new boarding pass just before she got on a flight to Houston last Monday.
“He said, ‘This is your new seat,’” Campos said, “and I said, ‘Excuse me?’ And he said, ‘I don’t know how to tell you this.’”
She said she continued by saying, “Yes?” (more…)
We have been waiting patiently, for over two years, for a moment, a very specific moment, when it was possible to confirm previous suspicions. Today is that day.
What outlines below is clear and convincing evidence the 2012 health event of Hillary Clinton resulted in a permanent compromise to Hillary Clinton’s vision. What is outlined below is why some seemingly innocuous notations can reconcile. We’ll also explain why the Clinton team cannot reveal the reality.

Back in October of 2012 the Hillary Clinton health story began around a cold, which became a flu, which became a slip and fall, which became a concussion…. which led to hospitalization for blood clots.
Pay close attention to the specifics here:
(Via Politico) […] She was discovered to suffer from “transverse sinus thrombosis” and began taking blood thinners to dissolve the clot. The concussion caused Clinton to suffer briefly with double vision, for which she wore glasses with a “Fresnel Prism.”
Those symptoms resolved within two months, Dr. Lisa Bardack said, and Clinton promptly dropped the glasses.
In 2013, a follow-up visit revealed “complete resolution of the effects of the concussion as well as total dissolution of the thrombosis,” Bardack said. She also tested negative for all blood clotting disorders, but remained on daily anticoagulation medication as a precaution. (read more)
Except we know, because of documented evidence, Hillary Clinton did not “drop the glasses”, she has been spotted wearing them recently. (more…)
