Against the backdrop of the largest single act of Jihad in modern history taking place in Nice, France, Donald Trump has cancelled the Friday press conference and announcement of his Vice-Presidential selection.
Donald Trump called in to both Greta Van Sustern and Bill O’Reilly shows to discuss the latest terrorist attack and his VP decision.
In a remarkable exhibition of her own desperation, and need to put her own candidacy on the scale of relevance, candidate Hillary Clinton also quickly called in to Bill O’Reilly for an interview, and then joined CNN’s Anderson Cooper.
Here’s how both series of interviews were broadcast beginning with Greta Van Sustern:

(more…)

When supreme court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg targeted Donald Trump with her personal attacks and invectives many people were stunned.
Many pundits and Legal-types were aghast, because the ramifications were/are considerable given the number of executive branch legal issues that end up in SCOTUS.  Under a President Trump, Ginsburg’s clear bias would mean solid arguments she would have to recuse herself from any cases originating within a Trump administration.
But from Justice Ginsburg’s perspective she has nothing to lose.   Ginsburg is all in for Hillary Clinton to win the election.  Ginsburg is not going to remain on the court in 2017.  Ergo the “recuse issue” is moot. The next POTUS is going to select Gingsburg’s replacement.  The walk-back is face saving for the cause only.

“On reflection, my recent remarks in response to press inquiries were ill-advised and I regret making them,” Justice Ginsburg said in a statement on Thursday. “Judges should avoid commenting on a candidate for public office. In the future I will be more circumspect.” (link)

There is only one party in Washington DC, the UniParty.  The professional political class support themselves beyond all other ideological factors. These are modern realities.

President Obama is in a very tenuous position this week as a nation has been stunned by the targeting of police officers.  Indeed, there is a solid argument to be made that President Obama created the antagonism toward law enforcement with various speeches and cursory accusations of unequal treatment.
As a modern social justice president who embraces radical extremist groups like Black Lives Matter, and as an executive community activist who has used the cabinet offices of his administration to leverage social change, President Obama has embraced many divisive entities and expressed ideological alignment with their cause.
The gunman in Dallas who targeted white police officers, specifically because of the color of their skin, is just one visible consequence from a President who rails against a system of law and order.  Obama’s ideology is more comfortable amid the chaos.  (more…)

The evidence we have discussed here in specific instances of criminal and terrorist incidence, has continually led us to believe there is an ideological shadow war within our current U.S. government.
IRS targeting, DOJ racial emphasis, the rise of the CRS, Jonathan Gruber (“grubering”), Benghazi aftermath, executive orders classified as “executive action”, Fort Hood terrorist attack framework/narrative, Philadelphia Naval Yard attack, San Bernardino terrorist attack and subsequent leaks, Dangerous political correctness, damaging rules of engagement, Orlando terrorist attack etc….
In essence, the White House and appointed upper level administration cabinet officials (writ large) on one side, and those tasked with trying to maintain law, order and national security on the other.

Ann Coulter mentioned something today about the testimony of FBI Director James Comey and the manner of how he continually referenced people to re-read his initial statement about the Hillary Clinton investigation:
Is Director Comey, like Jeremiah Denton Jr, blinking T-O-R-T-U-R-E into the camera, only for Comey the coded message is C-O-E-R-C-I-O-N?
(more…)

During FBI Director James Comey testimony today he stunningly revealed the July 3rd, 2016 interview with Secretary Hillary Clinton was not conducted under oath, was not recorded, there is no transcript of her question and answer session, he was not present, and he did not talk to all of the questioning agents.

Questioning Segment by Trey Gowdy: (more…)

Ralph Waldo Emerson famously said:

“what you do speaks so loudly that I cannot hear what you say”.

Cue the audio visual demonstration:

(more…)

A favorite term: “remove yourself“.  There’s massive power, leverage, seriousness, resolve and purity of control in that statement.  Top level executives use that term frequently to force lower level execs into positional extrication for a myriad of reasons.
Self removal allows lower leadership to “save face”.   Modern liberals cannot grasp the power in this approach because they’re optically selfish and fanatic about the appearance of their own control.  Blame-casting progressive leadership is constitutionally incapable of understanding how executive empathy exudes strength.

A truly powerful person will remind their team: “If you have to tell people you’re the boss, you’re not“.

Sen. Bob Corker is taking himself out of a pool of potential vice president picks for presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump, according to the Tennessee senator’s office. (link)

(more…)

A comparison video between Secretary Hillary Clinton and FBI Director James Comey contrasting the Clinton Message and Comey investigative outcome of Clinton’s private email use:

I wonder if the transcript of the FBI July 3rd interview (3.5 hrs) with Hillary Clinton will be available to the public ?
(more…)

Many people are rightly upset the FBI Director James Comey refused to recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton.   There are indeed ample examples of identical behavior resulting in criminal prosecutions for the same, similar, or even lesser circumstances surrounding Clinton’s behavior.
However, in everything political we all note there are, unfortunately, various quid-pro-quo arrangements based on leverage.  Knowing the system is rigged in that regard doesn’t make anything more acceptable, but it does aid the understanding.

If we think back to the Orlando Terrorist Massacre, one of the intentionally avoided aspects generally hidden by the national MSM surrounded the tips, warning flags, specific warnings sent to the FBI about the possible terror threat from Omar Mateen.
The media portrayed the warnings as stemming from Mateen’s “coworkers“, but we revealed the “coworkers” were actually Sheriff’s Officers.
It was law enforcement, all the way up to the County Sheriff, working at the federal courthouse who told the FBI that Omar Mateen was sketchy, not ordinary citizens or simply “coworkers”. (more…)