I know these are two people that we generally don’t care to know much about. However, given the 15-year sentence handed down upon Harvey Weinstein today, an ancillary story deserves a slight mention.
This story makes sense, because back in 2025 Candace Owens suddenly became an advocate for Weinstein. According to the New York Post, there was an apparent financial arrangement:
NYP – […] Prosecutors alleged during the hearing that they had recordings of Weinstein offering a podcaster $1.75 million in a jailhouse phone call to release videos to help his defense by “contaminating the jury pool and reaching the seated jurors before and after the trials.”
Weinstein engaged in a “scheme to disrupt the trial and instill fear in his victims,” Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Nicole Blumberg alleged.
Blumberg did not identify the podcaster, but Candace Owens released a podcast series in 2025 called “Harvey Speaks,” which featured videos of Weinstein at the notorious city lockup. She didn’t return requests for comment Wednesday. (more)
Unfortunately, this highlights why it was nice to have news teams and organizations. Not that those weren’t problematic, but still….
Yes, because nothing screams ‘truth’ louder than a well controlled media.
Roswell incident
JFK election cheating
JFK assassination
RFK assassination
MLK assassination
Ruby Ridge assassination
Waco TX slaughter
OKC bombing
2000 election steal
9/11 attacks
2008 financial crisis
Russia Russia Russia
2020 election steal
Ukraine war hoax
CK assassination
global warming hoax
AI apocalypse hoax
transgender suicide hoax
COVID hoax
That’s a very sad and truthful list. The fake news media has enabled all of it. As VSGDJT has stated; ‘it’s not about the first amendment, it’s about fake news plain and simple!
And….they aren’t done yet!
Roswell is in my opinion is used in many make a buck schemes.
Ok bombing and wtc in my opinion were setups.
AI getting out of control is NO hoax in my opinion.
You left out the Manson unalivings and trial
Nixon/Watergate
Carter Oil issues
Reagan assination attempt
Pope Assination attempts
The list is too long for anyone to remember them all…
Elections are a distraction from the fact that we have no representation
….said Walter Cronkite from Hell.
Candace may be getting a little “too close” in her investigation of who killed Charlie Kirk. The fedslop put out by the New York Post is only meant to slow her down in finding the truth.
Good grief
And yet here…..it would appear that she was prepared to back and help this piece of soulless rotten flesh! Maybe for a nice paycheck………
Very disturbing!
The operative word is “appear”.
And “may be”.
you can be sure she will address this directly on her show
she can be flaky, but she is not a liar
people forget candace worked with charlie kirk at the inception of TPUSA, and they remained close friends until his death
everytime citizen free press and the combined, controlled, right-wing pundancy posts anti-candace stories, within a few days the truth, is revealed
up to now, she has been accurate and truthful where it counts
Accuracy and truthfulness should count at all times, wherever it may be.
Do more research on Candace. I resisted coming to the conclusion only to find that yes, she is a liar and a fraud. It’s all there. Do the work and you will find it.
Could you give us some pointers on where to start our research?
Should we start with Ben Shapiro or Prager U?
I’m not sure where Candace is.
I’m inclined to believe she has been mutilated by slander and hear-say.
(inclined, not convinced)
But I caution you against trusting ANY media these days.
Unless these Media will debate without moderators, the whole mess is…well…. a mess.
If you can give concrete evidence of her lies, do so please.
Just watch her show while engaging your brain and you’ll see for yourself. But there are plenty of places that provide her lies and contradictions like MilkBar TV, Facts Me, Natalie Breisner, Paramount Tactical, Joshua Carr, Graham Allen (on YouTube and/or X). To name several.
I do not trust anything she has to say. My comment was specifically about being accurate and truthful at all times, rather than just “where it counts.”
Apologies, Lisa. I didn’t realize that you were not replying to me. I should have noticed the (reply to). Please forgive me.
Next time, maybe look beyond The Times Of Israel?
She was not his friend. She kept all of his text messages and couldn’t find anything more recent than 2023. Charlie kept a distant relationship with Candace because she was afraid she would destroy TPUSA. She did not work with Charlie at the inception of TPUSA. She was hired by Charlie after TPUSA had been in existence for a few years. She only lasted 1 1/2 years before being fired. Candace told Andrew that if they put someone in charge of TPUSA who she didn’t approve of (meaning not her) she would burn it to the ground. She has done that since it was announced that his wife would be taking over.
Nothing Candace has said has been proven to be true. You have drunk the Candace Kool Aid.
Sorry – I meant “he was afraid.”
She lied about macrons wife. That’s all I needed to figure out my position on her. She’s a proven grifter who has failed to get anything right. The only other proven grifter is Alex Jones who admitted lying about sandy hook so she’s in terrible company.
What evidence do you have that Macron’s wife isn’t actually a man ?
Have you seen non-photo shopped naked pictures ?
Eeeew.
A panel of biologists could make a determination if she/he disrobed for them to examine.
But he/she won’t.
Why not ? It would decisively put all rumors to rest.
Same thing with election mail-in ballot fraud.
If the ballots were shared and examined, the fraud theory could be laid to rest.
People who are challenged to prove their case usually will allow discovery. UNLESS….
Macron’s wife gave birth to 3 children. A man cannot do that.
You can work with someone who OTHERS do not like, and who want to do harm to.
Doesn’t make you stupid, just fooled….
Except after they do the harm, you should not work with them anymore…
unless maybe you are being threatened. by the same crew.
Hypothesis ?
Candace Owens absolutely is a liar. She has no evidence for her absurd claims and even admitted it during her debate with Andrew Wilson. Candace is the one spewing fedslop. Deep State Fedslop that is, from her “anonymous sources”. She claims sources from all over the world that no doubt want to sow seeds of division in MAGA, conservative, and Republican circles. And it’s working.
I agree as well, Candance has been accurate and truthful.
I’ll list all the things Candace has got right about Charlie Kirk for all the haters out there. Here we go:
1.
Charlie Kirk Quotes
“Jewish donors have been the No. 1 funding mechanism of radical, open border, neoliberal, quasi-Marxist policies, cultural institutions and nonprofits.”
“Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them.”
“… a beast created by secular Jews”
“Jewish donors fulfill all the stereotypes.”
“I cannot and will not be bullied like this.”
“Leaving me no choice but to leave the pro Israel cause.”
“I’m thinking of inviting Candace Owens.”
— Charlie Kirk, right before he was killed
SOURCES
The Whatsapp chat Candace Owens exposed is where the last bit comes from. They called her crazy and lied about her for doing it.
Somehow, they’ve never apologized.
The rest comes from The Charlie Kirk Show.
Candace adamantly denies any of this headline about taking money from Harvey and company. I will give the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise.
Um no. 🤣 She’s feeding you absolute nonsense and lies.
We had volumes of hollywood, political, and professorial celebrities gulags shreik and lecture us fear about how trump ‘s epstein stole the country, what about this deomocrat celebrity guru, raping this country for years for the left. He’s the one that the media just shoved under the rug for protectiung this democrat hero who is epstein game planner leader as weinstein the on who put epsteins game plan in execution… super democrats look at how dumb the gop for not holding hearings on this guys files!
you only take incoming fire when you’re over the target
trump has been decimating the left for a decade
popular culture has been completely transformed forever
Not the only one….
Something tells me this young woman is not there for a new car…
One of the most disturbing photos I’ve ever seen.
Oprah was talking about running for national office at the time this photo came out. It put the brakes on any political career for Oprah. She looks like a pimp.
That there was even talk about it, I truly have no words for.
It was the young lady’s expression which sent shivers down me….the light bulb, I suspect, just went on.
Looks like okra is making an offering to the devil.
Most of us missed it at the time, but this story shows that Candace will rent her platforms to bums.
Candace is right about one thing, and maybe only one thing:
The Official FBI Narrative(tm) is Horseshit. That is true.
On the bright side, she doesn’t hate all Jews, especially the ones who pay her $1.75 million.
It’s obvious that Charlie Kirk was breaking away from the consensus view that Israel should be considered a trusted US ally.
Gee, I wonder where that perspective shift originated?
It’s as plain as the nose on your face.
“Gee, I wonder where that perspective shift originated?”
Reading this letter that Ch. KIRK sent to the Prime Minister of Israel on May 2, 2025, should provide a partial answer to your question.
https://kbsos.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/2025-05-02_Kirk_Letter_to_Netanyahu.pdf
JFK had also written about nuclear power…
That letter is Charlie trying to find ways to push the Israeli narrative despite NUMEROUS issues and complaints that keep being brought up that he can’t whitewash. Charlie was a huge shill for Israel until it became untenable. I find it odd that he calls for information warfare essentially and even dreams up ways to deploy it that Israel already has been doing for decades, namely hasbara.
It appears that Israel is pushing the bad narratives (anti Israel on social media) as much or more than they are pushing the good narratives (like from Shapiro).
Frankly I don’t trust Charlie or the story surrounding his life and death. Not with Israel running the show. For all we know he’s still alive, kicking it in Israel with Epstein.
“Alleged”.
Why didn’t the prosecutors produce the ‘recordings’ if they were real?
Sounds like BS.
Owens wrote:
“Would appreciate a community note on this intentional smear. For the record, I did not accept nor would I have ever accepted one red cent to cover this case.
I was not paid by Harvey Weinstein, or any Harvey Weinstein friend, business associate, corporation, PR firm or otherwise.
So that we are beyond clear here— I was not paid or even offered payment for my interview. I cover cases that I am interested in and I do it entirely for free, always.
And if any lawyer suggested otherwise, they are lying to cover for their lying ass clients. Any other questions?”
Would you please provide a link to this quote?
0.o
She got paid for the Andrew debate so there’s her first lie
Pay attention. Andrew begged her to debate – she ignored him until he claimed on Joe Rogan that she was afraid to debate him even though he offered her 300K to do it.
So she took up his offer, and he looked like an ass. I don’t blame her for taking the 300K, dude shot his mouth off and finally got called on it.
And that was not an interview, it was a debate. So it was not a lie.
Might wanna read what your typing Shlam before you hit the ‘Post’ button.
REALLY?
A little naive I think!
Indeed
Treepers appear to be split on Candace. I read “Blackout.” It helped me confirm what I understood about the plight of the US black culture. The wife thinks she’s a justice warrior & wants the truth about her close friend Charlie. She may be right. We know from reading this site, there is a paid influence effort to splinter MAGA. How do you explain Tucker, Alex Jones, MTG, Massie, Candace and others recent flip? Makes no sense. I see the all out effort by Canada to attack MAGA with social media and influencers. They’ve openly admitted it. As one previous branch stated; Truth has no agenda.
Agree 1000%
As far as Candace vs Trump, seems like anyone mentioning Epstein becomes the target of his ire.
Trump doesn’t always seem to appreciate what side his bread is buttered on.
He is still the greatest American president ever.
Nobody’s perfect after all.
The flip is bc Trump has obviously been doing way too much for Israel compared to America itself – this is intentional bc Trump will be gone one day and it’s likely that a majority of the maga base will be mad that Trump didn’t focus more on the Everyman in America. So they’re already moving to round up those disenfranchised maga voters before they make their own antiestablishment party. Controlled opposition is the term for this.
When what they’re talking about no longer makes sense, it’s because they tote the money line. Just a rule of thumb for everyone out there. Unfortunately in today’s world you have to sift through a lot of garbage to get nuggets. Keep the sources of nuggets, throw out the rest and you can more or less make sense of the true picture.
Thats why I don’t listen much to candice or tucker when they are talking off the wall stuff. Its like youtube videos that look interesting but when you fall for that clickbate you go elsewhere fast.
Clickbate podcasts and money have made some use to be credible people uncredible.
Good grief is right.
This truth nugget will have no affect on the palace intrigue crowd.
…many of whom have recently discovered the Treehouse.
I saw Sundance’s post about MTG on Alex Jones – money corrupts – left, right and all points in between.
I admit I don’t follow the story so all I know about Harvey is what I’ve read. I think that what he is guilty of is offering female actresses and wanna be actresses opportunity in exchange for sex. It is implied that the actresses, at least those who came forward had no idea when invited to his place late at night that he might have a sexual interest in them, LOL. But in reality they flocked to ole Harvey to get the part and they knew the price. No doubt they resented him but yet they went and they did whatever they did. I’m not sure it was rape, bribery for sure. Kind of disgusting to talk about. But even female animals, chimpanzees for example, trade sex for gifts.
This makes candice not look so nice. She like some other podcasters are influenced by money to forge public opinion.
I am sure she is getting money to keep her thing going.
Tucker is too. He has like candice had some strange off the wall, why
are you saying this, type of podcasts.
Fake news cousin are fake podcasts.
“……….offering a podcaster $1.75 million in a jailhouse phone call to release videos to help his defense by “contaminating the jury pool and reaching the seated jurors before and after the trials.”
“contaminating the jury pool and reaching the seated jurors before and after the trials.”
Whether payment was made or not is irrelevant.
The NY Post article and the ensuing coverage reads like a wrap-up smear.
Not that there isn’t plenty not to like about Candace and how she operates.
The entire Weinstein trial is peculiar in that the attorneys may have been more interested in keeping a lid on things rather than providing a defense?
Then there’s the Allred attorney smack up in the middle of it.
While most everyone else is pouncing, I’ll give it the ’96 hours’ and see how it shakes out from there.
0.o
ill be looking for your 96 hour comment to see how someone involved evolves or stays
While I do not fully understand your comment, I do appreciate your participation in my fan club.
0.o
I always felt that candace was sketchy,,,,there is a reason charlie didn’t marry her and courted erika instead
LOL
0.o
Candace is a grifter no doubt. But I’m thinking so was Charlie and his movement – and especially his “wife”. Erika can’t be a real person – she’s playing a character named Erika, and she’s doing a terrible job of being convincing.
Many things could be surmised about Candace Owens after that interview with Andrew Tate. Whether he is guilty or not, he and his brother are not the most reputable of people — that interview was a softball.
The Hunter Biden interview was worse than softball.
Ah, yet another one. Nice addition.
Candace does seem to have a fondness for giving soft interviews to men who have a rather suspicious history involving young, perhaps underage, women, and with money. Tate, Weinstein, and Biden — what is it about once being happenstance, twice a coincidence, and three times being a statistic/enemy action?
Evidence please, Sundance.
I’m disappointed in your coming out so soon on this one.
How about you go read the article posted…
and follow the links, then come back if you have questions about the ebidence. 😛
The article was published by the New York Post.
0.o
I did. Read the article, watched the video with Candace interviewing (softball, VERY softball, confined to the legal situation in the court room only). It was the driest interview I’ve ever seen her do. According to the article, her representative stated she did not take money for that series. ACTUALLY, she did not “collect” money if I recall correctly. I remember the wording because collecting money does not say she did not expect money or if money would arrive under future conditions or results.
It’s kind of hard for me to see what I saw and NOT think she was getting paid for it. Her typical target is people like Harvey Weinstein.
I don’t know-know, but I certainly assume so.
Another thing about the article and why it’s just another hit on Candace is that today is Thursday. They “tried to reach her Wednesday” and then published first thing in the morning. Candace did a live show yesterday after 6pm Eastern time. They didn’t really give her a chance to respond though I’m pretty sure she’ll respond today. That’ll be interesting.
But this brings me to a bigger question. When I got the most interest in the treehouse, it was the Trayvon Martin story. This site and its people were instrumental in diffusing the disaster that the Trayvon Martin case represented. The open source intelligence and research that happened here were legendary. And it all started with people going “hey… there’s something not right about this story….”
When Charlie Kirk was taken, we were all in that same mode again just as we were when attempts were made on Trump. But then “we got’m” was announced and everyone seemed to forget some things were left on the table that didn’t seem right. For some reason Sundance was satisfied with the narrative. And when it comes to the facts out there? There are some very objectively strange things going on. But just sticking with the objective facts here’s two:
1) The timeline established by police reports conflict with the timeline described in the preliminary hearing.
2) Robinson’s car was shown being removed from his parents’ house on a flat bed truck. It had two tail pipes. In the hearing a video showing the same kind of car parking in a garage on the campus had four tail pipes. Not the same car. But it was used as evidence before the court as Robinson’s likely guilt in this case.
Those two very objective facts are worth looking at. Changed timeline is no small matter when both the police report and the information delivered in court are very different. And the prosecution claiming a car was Robinson’s when it clearly wasn’t.
What surprises me is that all of the relentless detail we went through in the Trayvon Martin case was focused on getting to the truth. Not presuming Zimmerman was innocent and that we needed to prove Martin was a thug. I don’t think anyone was interested in proving one side over the other. I think we smelled a rat and wanted to see where it was. No one here seems at all interested in that. I could be wrong. Maybe some want to know. But Sundance certainly doesn’t.
But what really sticks me here is that Sundance is now an additional voice pushing the narrative that “Candace is trying to tamper with the jury!” Tamper with the jury? Now when the left does that, it’s pretty obvious. The media doxxes the jury and releases the information to activists and the next thing you know, the jurors are living a life of hell. Candace is being given information. She isn’t “investigating.” And she isn’t making it up either. She is given information and then she gives her impression on what she thinks about it. The most she could be credited for is getting information confirmed as accurate or when not, she characterizes it.
But the Turning Point people are claiming she’s trying to tamper with the jury. Then I hear it again from other sources. Now, with this story, I hear the claim made again.
Here’s what I know [strongly believe]: the patterns for a coordinated character assassination has been going on since the moment Candace has been questioning the narrative. And the campaign has only expanded while the angles have been adjusted. They started out going for defamation. Candace has been careful with her words. She isn’t defaming. Now they are going for something that looks like interference with the justice system. As far as I know, there isn’t even a jury on this case yet. So influencing a jury is a bit broad and reckless as claims go. But that is where this seems to be going at the moment.
I differ with Candace on Trump a lot. She seems to think he is involved in some way. I doubt that. But if he did know something not speaking about it could be because the globalist leaders out there had something to do with it and it probably exposes “an ally” (note the quotes) and it’s not yet time for Trump to address this “ally” under his current plans. Whatever Trump’s plans are. I trust them. He’s delivering amazing results and I can’t toss all of that out the window because we can’t get to the bottom of a very strange case.
I can ignore her position on Trump while at the same time agree that something in the Robinson case smells REALLY bad. The microphone Charlie had when he was taken out is evidence in a murder case. You don’t give that back to the widow until the murder case is over. And there is lots of other evidence which has been destroyed or gone missing. We had similar concerns with Butler if you will all remember.
If you all want to criticize this? OK. Just say WHY you think something is wrong. Don’t keep asking me if I work for Candace. I don’t. I’ve been here a long time and if you’ve been here since Trayvon Martin or before that? Maybe you’ve seen my comments here. What I would really like to understand is how treepers aren’t interested in the weird things of THIS case. Not Candace. There are others who are also working in this area. Baron Coleman is one of them. No one seems to be attacking his claims. I’m thinking this is more about audience size than whether or not there is any “there” there. Throughout all of this, people have made statements which label Candace but not one person has actually made a factual claim that anything she has stated as “fact” was not a fact.
I think this is an important distinction. Name calling and labeling is what the LEFT does. The right sticks to the facts and even a reputation and characterization is based on SOME facts.
Call out all of the names you like. But if you don’t have any specific facts to point to, people WILL notice that your claims are empty.
Way too much focus on Candace. She’s just making money off the news. Maybe she’s controlled opp from our ally, or maybe she’s just doing her own thing. But she’s proven to throw out any and every conspiracy that comes her way and act like it’s solid evidence when literally none of it ever was.
Now the CK assassination being blown over here is a real disappointment vis a vis the spirit of the treepers resolve to figure out Trayvon. Clearly SD decides the way we are going with these topics and it’s basically shunned to theorize about what really happened. However, we can’t do anything until we see all the evidence at trial – and you’ll note the Trayvon case didn’t get serious over here until the trial.
So maybe things will change once the trial starts for Robinson. The problem is, with Trayvon we had stuff to talk about with the media being so involved pushing straight bs lies about Trayvon. With Tyler, there’s very little to discuss bc he is so obviously guilty. His gun, his admission, his location data, his clothes, it’s just too much. Yeah there’s a couple weird anomalies but we will get more info that will likely explain them at trial.
Personally, I think CK is alive and this is just just a story they enacted. And I think that due to the fact that our ally has near complete control of our country, and readily admits to putting on just these types of shows for public consumption.
There’s more to discuss than you realize. A clear indication that you haven’t been looking is that you’re not aware of it. The cause hearing provided the evidence being used. It’s sketchy.
If Kirk is alive, then he is permanently removed and separated from who he was never to return. He’s dead either way.
I am not going to turn this into a conspiracy as I have chosen to ignore most internet rumblings about what happened to Candance Owens after her departure from Turning Point. The request for evidence from this Sundance article was written and contained links to what is said. I get to choose to accept or pass up anything on this forum that is posted, as the rest of the posters here also have that choice.
There is so much out there on the internet that is absolutely not true and I just ask all of you to use discernment in what you choose to believe. I came during the Trayvon Martin trial and refrained any input because I didnt have knowledge of the facts until…the weather report was being put into the record. Teehee 😛
Okay I will tell you that Sundance will go further than anyone delving into the facts of what is occurring in real time, but also make corrections if not properly stated. Obviously choosing not to explore every conspiracy that is presented in forum keeps most things real and proper around here.
I know of other websites that make a list of all topics/persons that are not allowed on their site. Does that occur here, why yes it does :). You will find your post waiting for approval or actually deleted if you dont follow the rules.
That being said, I really didnt get into this article that deep until evidence was asked about.
Okay imma steppin off the podium to give others a chance to dispute what Im posting. 😛
Confirmation bias. It confirmed his pre-existing opinion of Candace Owens.
I have no idea about her, nor do I care about talking heads in general, but the few examples of slander against her which I have looked at didn’t hold up under examination, so that is a point in her favor.
Money hounds like Candice and Tucker are easily manuvered to push a narrative by the money they receive. If you want a certain NASCAR to be in front, add money. If you want them to block for the person who wants to be in front add money there also, then remove once your choice is in front.
What? No Pictures of Weinstein & Epstein with the Clintoons, Scummer, etc… and No Kushners, Ludnick, Wexner of course.
Perhaps Weinstein and Ghislane can be accomodated at the Same Feral “Ritzy” prison???
The District of Criminals deserves the Bastille Treatment, imo.
At least Harvey made some decent movies. Instead of the woke estrogen filled action movies. What hard evidence was there. Did any report it to the police at the time? What happened to the Statute of Limitations?
I am undecided on Candace. I tried to follow links in this article to hear details of what those prosecutors “alleged”. I wasn’t able to find any, nor was AI really able to provide anything solid. The number of people here running with this event being 100% true strikes me about as odd as all the people assuming Charlie Kirk was a monster without having really heard him at his events.
Also, the timing of this allegation is not accidental at all. The University was just about to release their independent investigation of the security lapses. The powers that be were trying to get out in front of it. Candace did a long segment on this report. Despite what you think of her past material (I’ve had lots of issues with it in the past), there is a lot in this episode that is worth the watch (and there are some cheap shots).
I sincerely hope that she sees prison time for jury tampering, but we’ve seen this movie too many times.
OK EVERYONE, as predicted Candace Owens today FLATLY DENIED accepting any money from Harvey Weinstein. She could still be lying, dodging the truth or playing semantic games. I just don’t get that feeling though. I much more get the feeling that that story was a pre-emptive strike from team Zionist to distract from today’s news below. She also offered up something everyone here can certainly appreciate:
A VERY SOUND RATIONAL FOR WHY THE NY POST HIT PIECE DROPPED THIS WEEK.
Utah Valley University DROPPED AN INDEPENDENT REPORT TODAY ABOUT ALL THE FACTS SURROUNDING CHARLIE KIRK’S ASSASSINATION! Link below.
https://www.uvu.edu/externalreview/
Candace did an hour and a half show on her YouTube channel going through the report. Summary: Owens has been FAR MORE ACCURATE AND TRUTHFUL than Turning Point USA has about these events.
In fact this report from UVU is DISTURBING in myriad ways. I have lost all confidence in TPUSA and their credibility. They simply LIE TOO MUCH AND TOO OFTEN ABOUT EVERYTHING!
Again, I want to emphasize this is NOT Candace Owen’s speculating. This is an independently contracted report paid for by UVU.
Go read the report. Attempt to match up those facts with the claims by TPUSA over the last year.
GL with getting ANY of TPUSA’s claims to be true and correct.
Charlie Kirk was very likely assassinated on a live stream in collusion with many of those at TPUSA for the second oldest reason in the world.
MONEY!
TPUSA is now an over $250 MILLION non-profit organization. Thousands, nee millions of people have been callously slaughtered for far smaller amounts of money and power.
What does Sundance always like to say: “…There are TRILLIONS at stake…”
Charlie Kirk’s voice was silenced forever over petty greed and a lust for power.
I can’t think of a sadder story in the last fifty years. I’m disgusted.
Please go read the report. Maybe someone can tell me how I am wrong. I do not think I am wrong.