Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial after the 12-member jury could not reach a unanimous verdict in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy.
The defense counsel of Ms Clancy violated every form of judicial ethics in his effort to expose and pressure the one male juror who refused to accept a not guilty verdict and stood his ground. We should not know the identity of the jurors; however, the female foreperson worked with defense lawyer Kevin Reddington to assemble pressure against the juror who would not acquit Clancy.
What took place in this Massachusetts courtroom and jury deliberation undermines the foundation of the system of trial by jury. During actual deliberations defense counsel was openly pressuring Judge Sullivan to remove the juror who would not change his position. A mistrial had to be declared, and Attorney Reddington then went outside and publicly called for retaliation against the male juror who would not accept the position of the female jurors. This is quite remarkable.
Massachusetts – After seven days of deliberation, the judge in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial declared a mistrial because the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict, with one juror refusing to join the eleven others.
Defense attorney Kevin Reddington asked Judge William Sullivan to remove the holdout juror, but Sullivan refused. However, Sullivan granted Reddington an hour to request an emergency stay from a higher court on the mistrial declaration. This would delay the start of a new trial.
Clancy’s case will likely be re-tried with a new jury; until then, she will remain in a psychiatric facility in northeastern Massachusetts. (more)
By the time you have read this, toxic female leftists will likely have publicly identified the name of the lone juror, and soon thereafter the rage of the American pussy hat crowd will organize to destroy the male juror. Jury secrecy and sanctity violations this extreme are horrific and destabilizing to the entire judicial system.
I have avoided jury duty after being disqualified for having the belief that the death penalty was appropriate in some circumstances. Maybe that’s par for the course, but I knew then that the entire system could be rigged.
I personally have a hard time accepting that our “Society” is so screwed up that this woman, who murdered her children in a calculated, methodical, way could become a “cause” for other women to bond over. That’s a scary, sick, trend.
“I personally have a hard time accepting that our ‘Society’ is so screwed up…”
Accept it. You will be safer than if you refuse to accept it.
Well said, Sharon…well said.
Hear , hear. Indeed!
Always be prepared to defend yourself any time and any place! Always be aware of your surroundings!
See mass formation psychosis……
Yeah. Salem witch trials come to mind.
If I was the prosecutor I could have ended the debate easily. Just ask a simple question. “If a voice told you to kill them in that moment in your head, what would you have done if a person stood over your shoulder and actually said those words? Because to me, someone telling you to do something is no different than a voice in your head. Meaning you’d have let a human tell you to do it. Further meaning you’re a dangerous unfit human that must go away for ever and leave earth”.
Born Free – I think (hope) it’s more that wacko leftist blue states are so screwed up they take on a cause like this. It shouldn’t be surprising in a state that allows abortion up to the minute of birth. I may be wrong but I have a hard time thinking this would play out this way in Florida, where I live. But maybe I’m kidding myself. It’s certainly disgusting and disheartening.
I tried to avoid jury duty, and was totally honest in all of my answers, but the defense attorney evidently did not see my raised hand and thus did not disqualify me.
So, I did my duty and spoke the truth, and his client was convicted….
Co-Pilot:
Massachusetts juror intimidation is governed by General Law c.268 § 13B, which makes it a crime to threaten, intimidate, harass, mislead, or offer anything of value to a juror (or potential juror) with intent to interfere in a criminal proceeding, punishable by up to 10 years in state prison or up to 2.5 years in a house of correction and fines of $1,000–$5,000.
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 268, Section 13B criminalizes intimidation of witnesses, jurors, and others connected to criminal or civil proceedings. The statute applies to both direct and indirect actions intended to impede justice.–Massachusetts Legislature
A person violates § 13B if they willfully:
Threaten, attempt, or cause physical, emotional, or economic injury or property damage to a juror.Convey a gift, offer, or promise of anything of value to influence a juror.Mislead, intimidate, or harass a juror or potential juror.These actions are prohibited when done with intent to interfere with, obstruct, delay, harm, or punish someone involved in a proceeding, or with reckless disregard for such interference.ma.elaws.us
Why this weakling judge didn’t hold this grisly shyster in contempt is beyond me.
>> Why this weakling judge didn’t hold this grisly shyster in contempt is beyond me
Vicious mob rule in Massachusetts may have something to do with it. In Massachusetts such mob rule injustice goes all the way back to 1692-3 with the Salem witch trials.
They missed one.
I’m convinced that the ultimate purpose of law school is designed to erase every last vestige of a conscience on the part of the lawyers (& by extension, most judges).
No. That would be the medical profession.
And that’s just in their first year!
Lawyers protect their own. Intelligence assets protect their own. Demon worshippers protect their own. Pick one or more explanations.
Professional courtesy!
Democracy….two wolves and a sheep deciding on the lunch menu.
Liberty, a well armed sheep contesting the vote.
We have crossed the Rubicon. We are either 60ish days away from what must be done, or 60 days before a brief respite before what must likely be done in January of 2029.
We are on the razors edge. Jesus has enough evidence to come down and demolish us all as far as I can tell.
Oh, He’s has had that evidence for a LONG time. He’s sent His Mother multiple times to warn us. This problem started way back with Martin Luther.
He does not send His mother to do anything. There is one mediator between God and man, Jesus of Nazareth.
So according to this statute, the Defense Atty committed a crime.
The Judge has more on his plate than he ever wanted or is capable of handling.
He should have recused himself at the get go.
The words of the law are impotent until a prosecutor takes action to enforce them.
Surely some demonic pure evil going on ..
THAT is an EXTREME understatement!
A very disturbing trial and crime. I cannot let it go. That is why justice is necessary and this woman be held guilty.
We need a guilty verdict on this woman and her actions to release the horror of the crime on her children. Their blood cries to us.
Sure, she is nuts ,but she knew what she was doing was wrong. She just couldn’t find her conscience. That is what laws are meant to solve. A lack of remorse and conscience in citizens.
For the first time in my life, I kinda get why they used to burn witches!
Many “witches” were natural healers. Whenever some sort of ill converged on a hamlet, village or town, the first people to be blamed were those healers. Frightened people required scapegoats, and sacrifices. There is also evidence that some women who owned land or other valuable possessions had those items confiscated. In fact, it is probable they were accused just so someone else could gain possession.
Many fine books on the subject. I recommend Witches & Neighbors: The Social and Cultural Context of European Witchcraft” by Robin Briggs. Well-documented and yes, fascinating, read!
Served on juries in different states. Never witnessed a prosecutor, or defense attorney, behave in such an unprofessional, threatening manner toward a juror.
🫣😡
“We know who you are! How dare you stick to your convictions and vote accordingly!”
🗳️
Now let’s celebrate all the recent rash of copycat mothers murdering their children.
👶👶👶
I don’t give a rat’s rear end how this woman is ultimately charged.
⚖️
Bottom line — she snuffed the life out of three innocent victims.
😇😇😇
Why wasn’t the jury sequestered?
The judge is a buffoon.
I found out in a court forum that the state of Massachusetts doesn’t allow it
ARE YOU FLIPPIN’ KIDDING ME?
Nope
The attorney alleges the juror lied under oath by not applying the reasonable doubt standard in the way the attorney preferred. That is rich, considering the attorney appears to have violated his oath of admission to practice law and may well face charges and disbarment. You can bet the juror will be identified, and then harassed, get death threats, and experience all manner of severe problems from the raging leftist mob. That attorney may have just gifted that lone juror with a really good lawsuit. Of course, being Massachusetts, it might take an actual holy miracle to win the lawsuit, and also to see any accountability delivered to that attorney.
Standing ready to help this lone, brave juror if he decides in favor of a lawsuit (or just if he needs protection from the loony lib women mob). I hope give-send-go will be his funding choice (or that of someone in his circle). gofundme prob. wouldn’t allow.
And to that lone juror: THANK YOU! You are a credit to what’s left of a civilized, just society bequeathed by our Founders. I’ve served as a juror on a second degree murder trial and couldn’t believe how so many can blame everyone and everything but the perp. (In my case, we couldn’t get unanimity on murder 2 because a couple others (ahem!) were ok to give the perp a pass because he was in fentanyl withdrawal and suffered an alleged concussion during the crime–the three-time felon didn’t know what he was doing, they said. Sure. Right. We did get unanimity on manslaughter, tho.)
Ms. Betsy posted (can’t recall where on this site) that the gentleman already has a fund set up. Unfortunately, no link provided. Hoping someone finds and posts the link.
Page 1 on this thread, Fionnagh, midway-ish down.
Ad rem, bless her, has left the information for the link.
Found it, donated (my paltry sum) and have reposted the link whenever appropriate.
Surprisingly the Mass Supreme Court refused to entertain the Defense attorney nonsense..
There will probably be a way to get Federal relief, as it is likely a civil rights case. A good lawyer on his behalf should be able to get that going.
That girl is speaking the truth with compassion.
And wicked smarts which most MA women have LOST hugely!!!
“….And its psychotic!” Boom! There’s a reason women were not allowed to vote and serve on juries.
If my memory is correct…
the protestors outsde of correctional facilities carrying out a death sentence, aren’t they mostly women?
“Infamous Astrologer”, “Esotric Animal Food Extremist”
Wut? 😵💫
Shut up, yapazoid!
I guess I don’t understand how the judge didn’t reprimand the defense lawyer for doing that? It’s disgusting how these judges are helping people literally get away with murder with little to no accountability for their part! The corruption in the judicial system is off the charts. This case is just another example of how we are fighting against such evil! Satan is clearly having a good day watching this debacle. May God bless that lone-sane juror for trying to get justice for those 3 innocent souls.
He didn’t even fully reprimand the lawyer after he got called “soft” for not removing the juror. He just got mildly upset and moved on.
Satan is all about the destruction of the family.
Let the news replace “her 3 children” with ”her 3 Golden Retreivers”. Bet there would’ve been a different outcome then. These people are sick!
Did anyone watch the trial and hear all the details?
I love Jesus, Im conservative. I’m not a crazy pink hatted nasty woman and I watched every day of this trial.
By all testimony from friends and co workers, family members, her own husband and mother in law and nanny this woman was the best…best friend, worker, mother, wife…
You can see the kids look genuinely happy and well taken care of in all the pictures.
This mother got progressively worse with post partum after each pregnancy. She was begging for help and didn’t get it.
She went to Dr’s and emergency rooms each prescribing a different drug. She couldn’t sleep she couldn’t eat and had high levels of anxiety.
She was turned away by 2 suicide hotlines because she didn’t have a “plan” set up to kill herself but she wanted to kill herself.
She was turned away from a post partum program because she had to many drugs in her system.
She tells her husband she’s hearing voices and wants to harm the kids and he leaves her alone with them.
Yeah she went crazy. A perfectly happy loving mother went absolutely psychotic and killed her beautiful kids and slashed her wrists and neck and jumped out a second floor window.
And through all the trial with all the details, 11 jurors saw, I guess what I saw and felt.
And the one hold out…according to the note that was sent to the judge said he thought there WAS reasonable doubt that the state did not prove she was in her right mind but he still wouldn’t vote with the other 11.
I think the pink shirts are out there because of mental health not that its ok that she killed her kids.
And why is it ok to point out all these shooters on drugs and what the drugs do to them but its not ok to say wow she was on heavy drugs AND she had post partum psychosis.
I didn’t know we had a multidisciplinary expert on here! You would think she’d have snapped out of her “episode” as she committed the third murder as she strangled the life out of her last remaining child. The last thing those kids saw as they expired was their mother standing over them.
We don’t. The thread is full of these people
She “killed” the baby last, but it took him three days to die.I guess she was getting tired.
I’ll bite… so why didn’t she just kill her damn self instead of murdering her children?
She did not murder three children. She executed them.
I stand corrected!
Executed is a word with connotations of carrying out a judicial order.
I will give a little for ‘execution’ style murders, but they are still murders, not executions.
This broad preplanned the murders of her children. Murdered them one by one. Up close and personal with no sympathy or empathy. Arranged them so that her husband would find them. Then faked a suicide. All preplanned.
She is a cold blooded murderer.
She tried, in a half hearted way…so lives in a wheelchair for the rest of her life.
Why didn’t she do THAT first and leave it at that?
I read that the damage may not be permanent. Wish I had saved the link as I recognize your interest in things medical…
I guess that’s the only justice those precious children will ever receive in Murderchusetts!
An excellent question!
Well. You changed my mind right there.
So it’s ok – since her husband shoulda – and her doctor shouda – and they shoun’t a –
Ok. Now I understand.
Wish I didn’t.
But I do.
Well said!
Thank you. An important perspective.
Super duper important. Makes me want to sign up for TikTok.
I can’t excuse the acts of murder that she committed. I wouldn’t for the father either. If you changed up the circumstances a bit would you see it the same. If she had gotten in a car and ran someone over would it still be okay? If she had killed her husband? mailman? mother? Brother? What if she went into the pharmacy and killed the pharmacist? Or a family in the grocery store? Is this a hall pass for all scenarios?
Exactly. My late husband and I lived about ten miles from the Tate-LaBianca murders at the time.
Well, I guess as long as he identifies as a woman, everybody be good with that… /s
Ok that’s funny.😂
Thanks for the summary. I really didn’t follow it, but was appalled when I did watch the vid clips which described the dozens of psych drugs she was on and it seemed reasonable to conclude the medical malpractice was glaring.
I didn’t know about the note where the juror admitted he believed there was reasonable doubt to arrive at the decision the state failed to prove sanity yet nevertheless was going to ignore the law he was required to follow as a juror.
Jurors take an oath they will follow the law as given and instructed. Therefore, by his own admission he violated his oath and should have been removed. When jurors refuse to follow the jury instructions due to a personal, intense inner belief, that is vigilante justice.
jury nullification I believe is what it is called. Jurors have the right to judge the law. Will get you thrown off any jury if they know you know about it.
It will also get you dismissed from the jury duty-summoned pool if they overhear you talking about it amongst each other while waiting for the your turn in the jury selection process.
From experience.
FIJA
No, that’s a mischaracterization. The judge explained it, but the Lindsay supporters want to ignore it. Reasonable doubt is a subjective concept. He had some doubt, but was it enough doubt to be reasonable enough to say I can’t say for sure she did or didn’t do it. That line is different for each person. Personally, for me, the searches on her phone, the fact that she planned it so her husband would be out for a long time running errands, tells me she planned to do this, so it’s first degree murder. I have no doubt.
being on drugs is not an acceptable excuse.
Which Law?
Uh-huh.
First off, she has said she only heard the “voice” the one time. She didn’t tell her husband or anyone else she was “hearing voices.”
Second, she doctor shopped and got multiple prescriptions. Did she take them all? All at once? Some at a time? Prove it.
Third, she’s a NURSE. She knows how to commit suicide, and it isn’t by slashing across your wrists, missing your carotid artery, and jumping less that 15 feet out a window.
Fourth, her husband was sent away so she could kill the kids, and he called her in the middle of her so-called psychotic break and she spoke normally to him.
Good grief, woman! Wake up and stop making excuses for a cold-blooded, premeditating murderer! Do you not understand the hell you are trying to unleash on women if this is not murder?
No woman who has post-partum depression will be allowed to keep her kids, if murder can be the excused result! No one is going to hire, vote for, or listen to a woman about anything, if the law states that it’s possible her “hormones” are making her insane!
As a woman, I want Clancy to fry. For those three precious children she murdered, AND for my granddaughter to grow up in a society that doesn’t treat her like she’s one hormone away from being insane.
“She didn’t tell her husband or anyone else she was “hearing voices.”
Ironically, based on posts here by an avid armchair defender of the defendant, your comment seems accurate. The defendant was prompted by two “expert” witnesses to talk about a voice urging her actions. I got the impression that these two “experts” (one a psychologist) were giving Clancy an excuse.
What’s also ironic is that by the hundreds of comments posted here and elsewhere, both the prosecutor and defense attorney can up their respective games for any retrial. We’ve sat here taking the testimony apart, analyzing loopholes and discrepancies. Attorneys usually hire a bunch of law clerks to do what we’ve done for free.
I’m a woman as well. I wish she’d gotten, or gets, Life with NO POSSIBILITY of parole. She needs a lifetime to repent to her Creator.
She KILLED three children. She did it, and yes she is guilty. Insanity? All who murder (aside from self defense) are not of right mind. She did the unthinkable and yet SHE did it. No get out of jail card because you were in a “psychotic moment”— YOU grabbed your exercise bands and strangled three of your own children one by one — and then knew what you did was wrong and attempted to kill yourself. If you really wanted to do it why would you not just use those same exercise bands on yourself? Worked so well on the three innocents that you so successfully snuffed out. Sorry all but I am truly disgusted that only one juror had the good sense to stand his ground and call it what it is – cold blooded murder – no excuses necessary!
Imagine living here and dealing with these people on a regular basis. I can’t stand it. I’m only here because my kids are here and that’s important to me.
You’re unhinged and unstable.
She was failed by the medical system, no doubt about it….But she still killed her children. It was reported that her toxicology levels were low.
My other thought…perhaps she had an underlying case of schizoprenia that with each pregnancy/post partum pushed her a little more into that disease?
Onset of schizophrenia in women, is late 20’s to early 30’s. She is 36. She is the right age…Hallucinations are part of that disease. As are delusions, if I am not mistaken…
Who knows? However, she does not need to be around society.
However she should NOT be around people (society)! Life in prision, no possibility of parole.
I am disgusted that this has ten upvotes. You must all have those stupid pink hats stashed in a bureau drawer.
i hope “Snarfinigus” will forgive me for reposting without permission,
but i think he drilled down to the very core of the matter.
insanity or depression or drugs were never the issue.
she is a serial killer who, with malice aforethought,
followed a meticulously thought out plan.
Snarfinigus
September 3, 2026 4:07 am
She sought the drugs, she swallowed the drugs,
she changed doctors to get more and better drugs.
No one forced her to take the 13 prescription drugs.
She did it willingly, with an insider’s wisdom for perspective.
She knew it was potentially risky before taking the first pill.
No one told her to kill her children.
(that’s her lawyer’s argument talking)
So, just where does her own personal responsibility begin?
I say, at the beginning.
She belongs in jail for murder, for the rest of her life, with no chance of parole.
An alcoholic pours the first shot, himself.
Is it the fault of the alcohol industry?
The gambler walks into the casino by himself.
Are the casinos to blame for his addiction?
The criminal grew up in a crime ridden family.
Is his criminal behavior as an adult someone else’s fault?
We are each responsible for our own actions.
I assume the 11 jurors were leaning toward Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity, not an outright acquittal. She would avoid prison but would be placed in confinement.
She did admit and stipulate to killing her children. Guilt was already established.
When the judge added manslaughter as an option, I thought that would be the final verdict.
https://x.com/libbyemmons/status/2094775367101714904
Which medications was Lindsay Clancy prescribed?
Here are the different medications Clancy had filled leading up to Jan. 24, 2023, according to a medication list shown in court by the defense on Monday, July 27:
What do each of the medications do?
Here’s a brief description of what each of the medications is often prescribed to treat, according to the Cleveland Clinic:
I know she killed her children and she is guilty
BUT THE PSYCHIATRIST IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE IMO
And why didnt the husband see she was struggling?
Why didnt HE also help her and take control or call on the family to help while she is hospitalised?
He didnt waste time in getting remarried
Lindsay Clancy’s former husband, Patrick Clancy, has remarried Dr Rachel Danis, in April 2026 a fertility specialist based in New York City
Relocation: Patrick moved to New York City a few months after the tragic deaths of his three children in January 2023.
Divorce: He filed for divorce from Lindsay in February 2024.
It seems noteworthy: Everyone of the prescribing doctors is a woman, I see the name Kayvon, I assume that is a woman. But aside from that name, ALL these doctors are women.
She must have chosen to see only women?
I see in a post above that Lindsay was doctor shopping- for women doctors?
This detail I’d think would matter.
“ And why didnt the husband see she was struggling?”
The husband started to work from home, he saw she was struggling.
“Why didnt HE also help her and take control or call on the family to help while she is hospitalised?”
Both his parents and her parents were on call at all times according to the testimony from the family.
They also hired a nanny to help her so she could take a break from parenting.
Did she ingest them or have them as props?
Rainy, I see you are taking a lot of flack, here.
I went through ten solid years of hell with my husband when he was put on meds by a v.a. psych dr for ‘anxiety’ and ‘depression’.
These meds were originally meant to be used for six thru 12 mos while the patient got help and counseling and got back on track.
Guess what. Big money was to be made. And so these drugs are now prescribed for life.
As my husband sank deeper and deeper into dispair he was stuffed with more and stronger drugs.
He got no therapy. Just drugs.
He became a person I did not know.
Like a mean zombie.
I believe he could have killed me or watched me die with no feeling at all.
Then the v.a. forgot to send his meds.
I did not know this but I knew something had changed.
He became so nice and normal I felt surely he had planned my demise.
It was like we both awoke from a nightmare.
I know what we lived through due to commonly prescribed psych drugs and a lack of needed counseling.
I do not excuse Ms Clancey’s actions but I hope and pray to God some light will be cast on what seems to be the over prescription and long term prescription of these drugs.
This is just our experience. I’m sure there are plenty more.
God bless you and your family.
Anyone following this topic should read Ripond’s book Your Consent is not Required, and Dr. Peter Breggin’s book Toxic Psychiatry. The facts about these toxic drugs causing suicide and homicide is devastating.
For those who haven’t read … ignor-ance is a remediate-able condition.
Those who won’t read are no better off than those who can’t read.
It takes critical thinking skills applied to what you are hearing at trial.
Why did she fail at killing herself? Why were the cuts on her arms so shallow? Why didn’t she just get in a bathtub and slash her wrists where the veins are? Did she think jumping out of a second story window would kill her? I doubt it.
People who want to kill themselves jump out of the 5th floor or higher or a bridge. Even young teenagers can figure out how to do this if they want to die. It looks to me like she wanted to kill her kids but did not want to kill herself at all. She just wanted it to look like she did to gain sympathy from the naive and guileless.
That is not crazy; that is evil and manipulative.
Baretta: Don’t do the crime if you can’t do the time.
A single line in a simple theme song to a 1970’s TV show sums it up best.
Or Popeye, “Wrong is wrong even if it helps ya.”
She murdered her kids. The rest of this nonsense doesn’t matter at all. She should be executed. End of story.
Thanks for the info, Rainy.
I don’t think it absolves her, but it does cast it in a different light.
Especially knowing that Big Pharma is evil and genocidal, not just with Vaxx, but also the Psych Meds behind the Trans Shooters, etc.
Reddington let his ego get in the way of his professional responsibility. The Pink Harpies applauded him every time he came to court. The publicity went to his head.
He took the verdict to be a personal insult to his advocacy abilities, when it was just twelve human beings trying to wade through a complex and emotionally charged case. Sometimes the best lawyer in the world can’t win a case if the evidence isn’t there.
When I started out as a young lawyer in a firm that represented policyholders for some insurance companies, I got the small claims cases filed by people who wanted their deductible back, and claimed out policyholder caused the accident. I lost a lost of them in the beginning, and used to coming dragging back to the office. The older lawyers would laugh at me, and say, “Got to toughen up, kiddo, and roll with the punches.” And I eventually did.
Reminds me of Fauci.
A juror justifying Clancy killing her children could very possibly killed their own child via an abortion. Justifying Clancy’s guilt justifies their own guilt.
It had better be anchored to a massive deep groundwork.
And made of a strong, space-grade titanium alloy.
Saw this and immediately thought of The Bacchae (Euripides), first performed about 400 B.C. Seems like nothing much has changed when a group of women get out of hand.
God bless the holdout. My home has a spare bed and bath if he needs sanctuary from the pink hat harpies.
I will donate…
He’s a hero! I would cherish to be in his position–fighting against all these evil women and weak men to stand up for the 3 kids who were brutally murdered. What is more noble than this!
It’s “The Thinker.”
Interesting.
Eleven people.
The other man and his views are irrelevant. It is all about the women and the male holdout. Nothing about the facts in the case.
Why were there only two men on the jury?
God Bless him!
The lone male juror who held the moral ground despite being harassed and tormented by the depraved ghouls on the jury and the corrupt, lawless defense lawyer, is an American Hero. He may have single-handedly saved civilization for a time by not agreeing to acquit the cold-blooded killer who barbarically, systtematically murdered her own children, and who has become a local folk hero for some of the most depraved people on the planet. One wonders where they could possibly find so many amoral ghouls to place on the jury, but then again, this is MA, where twisted liberal psycho-tards abound.
That must have been exactly what it was like. I don’t know how he kept his patience. I would have been sorely tempted to start swinging.
As Riddington calls for retaliation against the one juror, he should contemplate that he is walking on a two-way street.
The prosecutor could (and should) file a complaint with with the trial judge or the MA Board of Bar Overseers.
This judge should of been held him in contempt
Shouldn’t he be disbarred for calling for retaliation against the one juror?
Isn’t he – as an attorney – an “officer of the court” and duty-bound to uphold civil conduct?
The defense attorney reminds me a bit of Tim Waltz.
This insane event will scare normal, rational people from volunteering to be on a Jury.
How perverted.
And the 11 were wrong.
They know it.
We know it.
Even the mentally unbalanced Clancy Lady knows it.
Yes. She does know it.
I am scheduled for jury duty in a leftist college town, this year.
As a long time, divorced, American man, I’m no longer calibrated for “feelz.”
If there is proof, the party is guilty.
All of the pussy hat women view the case as just three late-term abortions. Tragically, the Massachusetts government officials seem to feel the same way.
Nailed it.
I still say retrial this in Alabama….
Texas?
Lindsay honey, do the the right thing…suggest you put Don’t Fear The Reaper on continuous play. Kisses!
The juror will probably have to move out of state. If he does, I hope he moves to the reddest area and people give him a house.
Yes, a crowdfunding campaign titled “Stand With the Juror Who Wouldn’t Cave” has been created on GiveSendGo
Stand With the JurorLindsay Clancy strangled her children. Cora was 5. Dawson was 3. Callan was 8 months old. Her lawyer stood up in court and admitted she used exercise bands to kill them in the basement after she sent her husband out for takeout. Two were dead when he got home. The baby died three days later. The only argument left was whether three homicides should count.
The country got the full TikTok-diagnostics package. Postpartum. Psychosis. Voices. Trauma. A stack of pill bottles and a sad playlist. The SSRI-medicated mob ran cover like this was a self-care story instead of a triple child killing. They wanted a diagnosis, not a verdict. They wanted her sick, not guilty. They wanted three dead kids memory-holed so nobody had to say the words mother and murderer in the same sentence.
If a father does this, he’s a monster by lunch. No mental health talk. No pill-bottle excuses. No entertainment of feelings. A man kills his kids and the country wants him buried. A woman does it and half the country starts writing her a medical alibi. Personal responsibility for thee, never for her.
One juror held his seat. He looked at what she did, not the brand of Zoloft. So the defense demanded the judge throw him off the jury for “not following reasonable doubt.”
The judge left him on. The jury hung. Mistrial. Now she can be tried again for killing her children instead of getting a standing ovation for her symptoms.
We’re not letting this slide.
If they come for him, and they will, this is to cover security, lawyers, and lost work.
Lindsay killed them.
Everything I’ve read about the judge’s rulings (except not sequestering the jury) indicates he ran a clean trial with no reversible error.
Even the hung jury/mistrial ruling was backed up in an emergency hearing before a justice of the Supreme Judicial Court. The justice agreed with Judge Sullivan.
Just because it was a high profile case did not mean the holdout juror should be grilled further about his understanding of the law. A hung jury means a mistrial even in internationally sensational cases.
Defense can file all the motions it wants, but I can’t see any appeals court overturning this. One issue appeals courts rarely, if ever, go into, is witness credibility. The appeals courts just reads words on a page, so the jury’s evaluation of the live witness is accepted.
A mistrial is better than the acquittal that 11 no functional adults were going for.
I misread the jury as 11 for conviction & 1 for acquittal.
The mistrial keeps the case in play.
Sad to say I didn’t. Especially when I heard the witch jurors were showing up wearing pink.
Exactly. O Dex, where art thou?
Wow.
The fairness of the whole jury process was destroyed when shysters were allowed to start hand picking juries.
But what do we expect coming from a judicial system that is rotten to its core and not longer blindfolded.
If an HOA was a jury.,.
WHAT??? Only one juror believed that this monster was guilty? I guess the popularity of the Massachusetts “An Act Prioritizing Patient Access to Care” (St. 2026, c. 188) predicted this outcome, but it is still so heinous to imagine. God have mercy on us all. I wonder what the reaction of the nation is to this mistrial? I wonder how many states appear to have a significant number of people sympathizing with this monster?
The Defense Attorney is sure into attempted Jury Tampering.
He was trying to taint the jury pool for the re-trial.
If that lone male juror is driven to violence by the defense attorney’s attacks on him, can he go ahead and strangle him to death and claim he was insane due to an intense rush of testosterone and adrenaline?
I would think so.
In South America killing one’s wife in an act of jealous insanity used to be a legal defense worthy of acquittal. I suppose we could be heading back to those times. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander, as they say.
I suspect much will come out before she is retried. This was her only chance at acquittal.
In normal times I would agree with you. A second trial usually leads to a conviction. But a large portion of the female population in this country are now criminally insane, and at least some of them are likely to end up on the next jury. I don’t have high hopes for justice here.
So there are accessories before the act!? Who are not being held accountable!?
Abortion-Mutilation-Murder and Euthanasia are not things I would have ever thought would become celebrated and valued in this country. This hurts my heart.
My thoughts are this- Lindsey Clansy committed premeditated murder. Just because she may have mental issues does not mean she can’t be clever and calculating.
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it.
William Penn
anyone want to bet the offensive defense attorney votes demonrat?
In Massachusetts, that’s easily a 4 to 1 odds of being correct.
I continue to say the same thing over and over again…two things can both be true at the same time!!
This woman is absolutely guilty of murdering her children…AND we absolutely need to have a serious conversation about the overprescription of black box label medications in this country!
If a bartender can be criminally charged for over serving someone who is clearly intoxicated, and who then later goes out and causes an accident, than a doctor should be able to be criminally charged for over-prescribing medications to a patient who is clearly a hot mess!!
Sorry, not sorry, but I absolutely believe that Pharma is pushing a lot of these “organic” protests in support of Lindsay Clancy because they need the subject to be changed!
“I absolutely believe that Pharma is pushing a lot of these “organic” protests in support of Lindsay Clancy because they need the subject to be changed!”
Then this is the link for you:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/09/02/massachusetts-judge-gives-final-instructions-to-deadlocked-jury-in-trial-of-lindsay-clancy/comment-page-4/#comment-12788363
“….The blueprint is fully realized: a catastrophic event generates the necessary public terror, while political actors script the corresponding psychological framework. Data pipelines are anchored by systemic assets, as predictive algorithms automate ongoing risk metrics. Enterprise data specialists step in to bridge the gap into comprehensive hyperautomation, backed by corporate funding, while international media houses distribute a unified narrative. Simultaneously, reproductive medicine gatekeepers manage the family infrastructure. The public is directed to focus entirely on the individual tragedy, obscuring the massive, interconnected institutional machinery operating directly behind it.”
Yes. A few doctors should have been sitting at that same defense table.
Astroturfing would absolutely be the style of big harma.
I still remember much of the shilling done to push the clot shots for covid-19.
Nevermind them also trying to keep those records sealed for 70 some years.
Then there are the SSRIs, and adverse outcomes from the vaccination schedule for children for the last several decades, and the list continues to grow with hormone drugs for the gender dysphoric.
There’s big money for big harma keeping life long customers on their drugs. Greed is a powerful motivator.
Thank you.
This has been the thrust of my comments.
Yes she is guilty of murder but IMO she had a number of partners in this crime.
Funny how more and more psyc drugs are rolled out and more and more murders result…
“Thank you.
This has been the thrust of my comments.
…”
And mine.
Ironically, the defense attorney has already been teeing up to sue the pharmacy companies and medical professionals on behalf of his client. They could try to get her millions of dollars so she would be sitting pretty once she convinced the doctors she was well enough to be released. I’m not a lawyer, but it would seem that now that she has NOT been acquitted due to “temporary insanity”, their case is significantly weakened.
You would think Big Pharma would be trying their best to influence a guilty verdict, as otherwise everyone under the sun on psychiatric meds will be suing them for any wrong doing they get held accountable for while on their meds. Count the families in who’ve lost Trans family members after they went postal and were then killed by police. They could claim it was the gender transition meds they were on that are to blame. And the families of all the victims who were shot by these mass shooters…. etc, etc.
Dox this guy if you want but that’s a two-way street and these other 11 witches will wish they hadn’t voted to free a woman who systematically and in premeditated fashion strangled 3 of her children.
Killing children is some kind of holy sacrament to white women in America.
Not all of us!
Satan worship groups are alive and well in the US and have been for many decades.
No, only the liberal ones.
First of all it is very hard to prove a negative. The burden of proof was on the prosecution to prove she wasn’t psychotic when she killed her kids. That is a very tall order. A good defense lawyer knew that and capitalized on that. Having said that the defense lawyer’s relationship with the jury is suspect. He knew early on during jury deliberation that there was one hold out. How did he know that? Nobody should have known if it was 11-1 for guilty or 11-1 not guilty.
How did he know that? Nobody should have known if it was 11-1 for guilty or 11-1 not guilty.
The stupid jury forewoman might have leaked that in a note.
OR
There was a mole on the jury.
OR
One of the jurors might have said something to a jury bailiff who leaked it to the defense.
Or maybe a book deal.
From what we know now is the forewoman wrote a note to the judge.
This judge needs to be disbarred for allowing this behavior, without holding either the foreman, or defense counsel in contempt. And, anyone doxxing the lone juror needs to be arrested and prosecuted.
Frankly, the defense council also needs to lose his law license!!!
You are far too lenient, and this is why we continue to have these problems. We need executions, not administrative discipline.
Instead of Twelve Angry Men, the jury was Nine Hormonal Psychos and Two Cucks.
Retired Magistrate here: Yes our legal system is this screwed up; that is why I am a Retired Magistrate.
And why I am a retired litigator.
The entire judicial system is broken. This just ads to the evidence.
IMHO, it is not the system. It is something ..UCH more basic!!!
MUCH more basic!!
How many people/families go to Church on Sundays? Where are there non-essential businesses closed on Sundays? How about using The Lord’s Name in vain?
Society, as a WHOLE, needs to turn back to God and His Laws!
Then, we’ll be okay, and not before!
It’s only going to be as good as the people are.
While feminists mourn the recent passing of Gloria Steinem, the pussy hat crowd that will go after the lone holdout juror is a horrible blot on the legacy of Ms. Steinem –
I have yet to hear from the feminists why they are all right with the way women were – and are – suffering under the Taliban – the women suffering under the mullahs of Iran – baby girls subjected to female genital mutilation according to Islam – perhaps even here in America – why women are subjected to abuse within their marriages and very young girls are forced into marriages – and why, if the Church of the Latter Day Saints determined to forgo polygamy so that Utah could attain statehood, why is it all right for polygamy under Islam to be practiced here in the USA if men who are Muslim have several families, all receiving benefits?
Why don’t the feminists stand up for female sports teams in schools being free from competing with males? Why was Title IX established to expand and support sports activities for girls (and the expanded potential for sport scholarships at the college level)?
Why don’t the feminists stand up for FEMALES, born as females and against transgenderism altogether? Transgenderism is in itself the ultimate dysphoria created from those around the child, if they are giving them drugs to ruin their normal development as girls and then women. Isn’t that the ultimate abuse to cause a girl-child to be robbed of her breasts and her ability to make love with a man and bear children? Or the same, the extreme violence also against a boy to deprive him of his natural, God-given manhood? Isn’t it basically genocide against all the children that are being transgendered so that there will be no more of their line? I would think this would be where the millstone and lake of fire will come into effect at some point, against those who have promoted this.
Why don’t the feminists stand up against abortion altogether in solidarity with those tiny babies who would have grown to become women and babies who would grow to be the men that would love them and have families with them?
So, look, I have launched into a rambling here, just thinking about women in pussy hats getting ready to make life hell for one man who stood up against pressure – dear God please surround and protect that man with Your angels and I hope that if there are any TRUE feminists still in existence they would say, “stop, for the love of God, what are you doing?”
Not rambling to me. Just heartfelt common sense and logical thought applied with compassion and compelling and undisputed truth.
Thanks for your words. You said what I have thought for a long time. Way better than I could have ever done.
thank you!
Wow, you covered a lot of territory there! You go, girl! 🙂
thank you! 🙂
I call bull on the outpouring of support. This has all the earmarks of organized outrage for a media narrative… or even fundraising
The liberal Karens that are normal, functioning people (who nevertheless drink the kookaid) aren’t jumping to their Facebook to show public support.
I’m sure they would probably say Trump was somehow responsible and bemoan the postpartum depression angle. They might even show concern over the psychotic drugs playing a role.
Nobody flying little Ukraine flags of support. They feel sorry for her but not to the degree of wanting to identify with her murders.
No doubt. This is bought and paid-for nonsense. I keep wondering when the RICO indictment of George Soros will be handed down. Not in my lifetime, I suspect.
Two things can be true at the same time.
The Clancy family is victim of irresponsible, greedy, medical workers (I wouldn’t call them professionals), and the mother is responsible for the deaths of the children.
She killed them. She is guilty per her own admission.
She must be bring to justice.
The same about the health care system that allows and promotes the kind of practice. Big pharma and methods of promoting drugs need to change too.
Every day that passes where a lawyer speaks is another day that proves they should be jailed. The women admitted killing the three babies for the sake of God.
This is going to come back and bit women in the a$$, if a woman says or seeks help for PBD or any other so called mental problems caused by having children, they more than likely will lose their children. Men now have a good cause to receive custody of their children from these crazy dam women.
Lately I have noticed a lot of buzz on the net about men walking away from women dating or anything serious, just plain old get lost. The reason this is known women posting on tick tock Instagram. A few have said their boyfriends left them because they support this nut clancy. Really no kidding!
God has given them over to that reprobate mind.
Every day that passes where a lawyer speaks is another day that proves they should be
jailedexecuted.Most Americans now know that many leftist women are evil. Many women always play the victim when they actually are the culprit. Our justice system is totally corrupt because the left corrupts and destroys everything. This “mother” is a coward. If she was so depressed, she should have killed herself, not the innocent kids. Men have hormones too (testosterone) and could use it as an excuse when they commit violence/murder. Same with taking steroids. The good news is that most people (including a lot of women) know she is guilty.
Keep in mind….
At Plymouth, the court’s computer system ‘select’ the entire jury pool of about 300.
If one rogue staff member copies the list of 300, and illegally passes to the defence…..
The defence do a check on all 300, to see who is of a leftist mindset, political donation record, social media, etc.
The judge will exclude at least 200 based on normal exclusion reasons.
Of the remaining less than 100, the defence and prosecution each get 18 peremptory challenges, and, based on the defence’s illegally gained knowledge of the jury pool, they will know who to include or exclude – increasing their odds of poisoning the jury.
The jury contains 18 people. Only at the deliberation stage, it is reduced to 12. The defence need to ensure 18 of their insane accomplices get selected to ensure an acquittal.
An important question is, who has access to the 300 jury pool list for the next trial?
I asked a Gen Z, having had a recent first experience with jury duty… using the opportunity to stress the importance of sticking to your stance & not succumbing to pressure from your peers (jurors) & outside influence.
I asked what would have been your verdict? He said “guilty.” I asked why, given the defense arguments? He said, “b/c she didn’t stop after the first one. She felt no remorse or regret & continued to systematically murder the other 2.”
Yes. Her husband was gone for about 20 minutes. She even researched restaurants to find one he should go to to pick up dinner that was far enough away for her to carry out her plan. Premeditation and rational, albeit evil, thinking.
If she tried to commit suicide it was because she knew that what she did was wrong, isn’t?
I’m in the middle of crazy land MA. You wouldn’t believe the text chats I’ve had with people. Two women I consider smart, on the ball people are watching crap on TikTok and coming up with all kinds of theories of how she didn’t do it. The husband did it and he told her she did it! It’s nuts here. I kept reiterating “she says she did it”. Then immediate agreement, yes, she did it. But then they were harping on the husband again. Completely immaterial. He could have been having an affair, for all I know. That doesn’t excuse what she did.
I drove on I-95 on my way home from work. Idiot supporters had Lindsay Clancy signs on the overpasses. Ay yi yi! I need out of here.
My cousin is a lawyer in FL, she thought she should be ‘innocent’….
Not worth my breath on arguing.
This man is a hero.
His name may well be remembered, though not in the way these pussy hats suppose.
Perhaps the tide is turning against these leftist creatures.
Hopefully, his courage is infectious.
“A mistrial had to be declared, and Attorney Reddington then went outside and publicly called for retaliation against the male juror who would not accept the position of the female jurors. This is quite remarkable.”
It is Thug-ocracy. Who in their right mind would consent to serve on a jury in Massachusetts after this latest psy-op?
They “Claim” she was on 13 different drugs and out of her mind, well, guess what, Charles Manson’s killers were on drugs and out of their minds, that is NO EXCUSE to let a killer walk.