Like many of you I am profoundly angered by the Supreme Court decision that fractures our nation and conveys citizenship to the children of illegal aliens born in the United States. [PDF HERE] In fact, I was so angered to my core, I went for a long walk before doing any further commenting on the matter.
U.S. Citizenship is now determined by how good at violating our nation’s borders, by conniving, by scheming and by deception to create a qualified child where no adult qualification exists. This is the most detrimental decision by the Supreme Court in generations and will profoundly impact our nation.
There is no longer an apple, it’s all worms.
Today, the Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship – the guarantee of citizenship status to everyone born in the United States.
In a decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, five supreme court justices agreed with the challengers saying Trump’s order cannot be reconciled with the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which confers citizenship on anyone “born … in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”
(6-3) Writing for the majority, Roberts emphasized that the “children born of parents unlawfully or temporarily present in the United States” “satisfy both elements of the Citizenship Clause.” “Under the Constitution,” he concluded, “they are citizens at birth.”
Roberts was joined in the majority by Justice SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, BARRETT, JACKSON and KAVANAUGH.
Justice THOMAS filed a dissenting opinion with GORSUCH and ALITO.
SCOTUS BLOG – In his dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito called the ruling, “one of the most important decisions in the history of the Court” and “a serious mistake.” “Careful analysis of the text of the Fourteenth Amendment and the process that led to its adoption,” Alito argued, “shows that it does not degrade the concept of United States citizenship in this way. Instead,” he contended, “the Fourteenth Amendment confers citizenship on only those children who, at birth, owe allegiance solely to this country.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed with the result that the court reached – that the president’s executive order is invalid – but not its reasoning. In his view, Trump’s order “does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment” but does violate a federal law providing that children who are “born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” are U.S. citizens. Congress, Kavanaugh suggested, “could amend” that law “or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But,” he noted, “Congress has not yet done so.”
Justice Clarence Thomas penned a lengthy dissent, which Justice Neil Gorsuch joined. He called the majority’s account “not historically accurate” and said that it “adds to the sad history of the Fourteenth Amendment, which was designed and understood to secure equal rights for the freed blacks but has instead been repurposed for political projects that the Reconstruction Congress did not support.”
Gorsuch also wrote a separate brief dissent, in which he appeared to suggest that Trump’s executive order might violate the Constitution as it applies to the children of undocumented immigrants who intend to live in the United States permanently. “If those parents are not domiciled here,” Gorsuch queried, “then where are they domiciled? And if the answer is nowhere,” he continued, “how can we reconcile that conclusion with this Court’s longstanding recognition that every person is domiciled somewhere?” Because the challengers in this case have argued that Trump’s order is invalid in all circumstances, rather than just some, Gorsuch explained, “these questions may not be properly before us. But their answers are undeniably important to a Nation committed to a view of citizenship open to all children born here to parents who can call this country their home.” (SOURCE)
Consequences and possibilities to come in the next few articles on the matter.



These same great legal minds couldn’t understand the definition of a “day”, and at least one of them need the testimony of a biologist to know what a woman is.
It’s all just fake. And we are expected to accept it or else.
Well they don’t know what’s woman is. They certainly can’t determine what citizen is.
The decision is tantamount to repealing US citizenship in favor of CITIZENSHIP OF THE WORLD.
That’s exactly right. The people who view the United States as the national version of a state park, a place which anyone in the world who chooses should feel free to enter, take what he wants, and stay if he so desires.
These people truly don’t believe in America’s sovereignty, we’re just an idea to them.
If there is any way to challenge this from a different legal approach and win…please try it….
“Invading troops” could be interpreted as the mass invasions which we’ve endured for the last 40-60 years.
But 2021-2024 wasn’t just invading troops–it was the invasion of the America-hating aliens!
That would require political will, which is sorely lacking…to the detriment of the REAL American citizen.
I’m sure that people like Mitch McConnell, Lisa Murkowski, Tom Tillis, Susan KKKollins and all the Democrats are celebrating this ruling. These people should be the first to give up everything to the “new citizens” but they will be a protected class yet again!
No mystery. Two Roman Catholics agree with the Pope.
Maybe Trump can do better with a nomination next time.
Not likely…he is only 1 win two losses. Would hate to see him go 1-4
Which one was the win?
If you look around the web, you can find analysis of the justices’ voting patterns, how often justice A votes with justice B and so on.
If you remove unanimous (9-0) decisions, there are 3 blocks:
the 3 libs vote together consistently, like 90% of the time (the 3 DEI justices: Kagan, Sotomayer, KBJ).
the 2 conservatives vote together consistently, again like 90% of the time
3 of the centrists (Roberts, Kavanaugh, ACB) vote together consistently, again like 90% of the time.
Gorsuch is on his own, and isn’t strongly correlated with anyone.
Of the centrists, Roberts tends to vote with the liberals more than he does with the conservatives.
I really think we have 3 libs, 4 moderates, and 2 conservatives. There are 4 swing votes.
We need at least 3 of the swing votes to win, they only need 2.
Before RBG and the great Scalia died, it was 4 libs, 2 moderates, 3 conservatives. Trump has brought the court back to the center.
Every GOP president since WW2 has made disastrous picks.
Eisenhower made Earl Warren chief justice.
Nixon promised to appoint originalists. Rehnquist was excellent but Nixon’s other 3 picks were disasters.
Roe v Wade (1973) was 7-2. Rehnquist voted no but the other 3 Nixon picks voted yes. Another 2 of the yes votes were Eisenhower picks.
Ford put a liberal republican John Paul Stevens on the court.
Reagan picked Scalia (excellent) but 2 centrists (SDO’C and Kennedy)
Bush 1 gave us Thomas (excellent) but also Souter (liberal)
Bush 2 gave us Alito (excellent) but also Roberts (bad)
There are 6 Catholic justices on the Supreme Court. No mystery you are wrong.
The 6 RCs voted 4 to 2 to give our country away.
I guess if someone steals their car and gives their kid the keys these good hearted folks will let the kid keep it.
the law schools mostly fell to the Left’s March Through The Institutions … most of their product is just rotten.
Very few law school grads have the initiative, or the analytical thinking wherewithal to reform themselves and become American instead of globo-homo.
Matt Van Swol
@mattvanswol
I have just finished reading Justice Clarence Thomas’s 91-page dissent in the Supreme Court’s ruling striking down Trump’s birthright citizenship order.
It’s incredible.
Here’s everything you need to know: 🧵
Cont reading thread…
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/2072067721320182265.html
Justice Thomas is exactly right of course.
And all the other ‘Justices” look silly for not listening to him, for not knowing all this or worse- for ignoring it.
The Supreme Court under Chief Justice Roberts has really fallen…
Please stop calling these six mooks “justices”. They are America hating glorified lawyers (in the same ilk as used car salesmen). They have basically said that a legal bestowing can come out of an illegal action. They are flatly stupid, political, compromised and corrupt ideologs. The “third box” just got closer to opening. Been mulling around in my head all day…”…all enemies foreign and domestic”. Angry doesn’t even begin to explain my mental state. SPIT!
Yes! So true. And because “history is written by the victors,” future generations will never know how this asinine ruling directly led to the loss of our Comstitutional Republic and all the freedoms she once bestowed upon us.
A disasterous win for the Communists -and- a HUGE loss to the American people.
So, hang on, folks. It appears that truly turbulent times are just around the corner… “if you can keep it.”
We would be so much better off today with a SCOTUS of two: Thomas and Alito.
The women on the Supreme Court are DEI hires. There, I said it! I mean it! They don’t belong there!
Barrett isn’t a DEI hire, just a liar. She purposefully pretended to be an originalist. The other two definitely are, especially the nut job Jackson.
I’m blaming that rotten old Mitch McConnell for this and other crimes against our country.
Crimes committed without consequences – again. fmm! A straight up traitor to our Country who is still allowed to walk free amongst all those whom he betrayed.
And the “Grand Experiment” continues to teeter on the precipace of failure thanks to the likes of him and his other cohort communists.
May he forever rot in Hell for his perfidy.
Can Barrett be removed for misrepresentation?
No, impeachment is the sole Constitutional mechanism for removal of a Supreme Court Justice. If our government was operated as originally designed, with our representatives representing us, and our Senators representing the states from which they come, and the US dollar being an actual US dollar, instead of a private fiat bank note, SCOTUS would have much less incentive to be bought off, and be inclined to put forth actual Constitutional opinions instead of doing the bidding of their masters..
But effectively, as the whole of government is bought off, blackmailed, or manipulated through psyops, they represent the interests of those who want to enslave us.
This woman agrees.
Roberts has outed himself as the enemy of all the divinely inspired principles Americans hold dear. Worth the clarity, IMO.
And just in case we missed the message, he sealed it with the $5 Million to the bimbo.
Thank you so much!
As a general rule, if the three twits are for it, it’s a terrible idea.
Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson should be regarded as antithetical judges. Whatever they decide is de-facto incorrect.
In other news, this is about to get VERY ugly.
These three stooges have no business being on the U.S. Supreme Court.
Anyone nominated by obama or the autopen are illegitimate and should be removed.
Domiciled means where your permanent legal lawful residence is. When you are traveling or not at your legal lawful residence it does not mean you are domiciled somewhere else…it simply means you are away from home. A child/minor shares the parents domicile…in essence he inherits it. Your legal lawful address is his address. That’s the way i see it anyway. This is a travesty and every member of SCOTUS knows…well maybe except Jackson.
Roberts Barrett Kavenauugh are all bought and paid for by Chairman XI. I hate them all with a burning passion. Rot in hell you losers.
I pray that CPS comes and takes all her children away, with no ability to retrieve them. She must reap what she has sown.
The 14th Amendment is not about any newborn infant. It is about the status of adults. Adults who were born in the US, or naturalized in the US, are citizens of the US and the state in which they reside. That is what the amendment is saying. Babies born to transient aliens, legally here or not legally here, cannot have NATURALIZATION bestowed on them by way of being born. Babies cannot undergo the process of naturalization. That is impossible. Babies do not “reside in a state” by their own recognizance. Their parents have to supply the baby’s residence.
The amendment therefore addresses the citizenship status of ADULTS, not INFANTS.
Also, babies can’t break any laws. They can’t even offend anyone. So, how can BABIES be subjects of anyone’s legal jurisdiction? How the hell can a baby knock over a bank, embezzle funds, or plot the overthrow of the government? Infants are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of any government. The baby’s parents are. Whatever government to which the baby’s parents are subject, so is the baby also subject, not because the baby gave consent as that is something else a baby cannot do. The baby is the responsibility of the parents, ergo the baby is subject to THEIR jurisdiction.
Say what you will about the ruling. This goes on the lengthening list of things President Trump has introduced that almost no President before him dared to touch.
Save America Act, Fixing DC,
Iran,
Birthright citizenship 🤬
Etc, etc, etc.
The Man in the Arena. God willing mountains will move the change this travesty of a ruling. Spit
And all of it and much more would be easy IF he had the stones to drain the swamp. But no, he’s Mr. Rodgers now.
I wonder if this decision might help to bring people like MTG, Massie, Tucker etc back into the America First MAGA tent? Maybe the fight will bring unity. It isn’t that i care about them. I will never trust any of them again. But this issue is just that important, unless their hatred blinds them even through this. We need as many soldiers in the battlefield as possible.
Just wondering.
It won’t. Trump was warned about ACB, how bad of a judge she would be, and she has done exactly what Trump was warned she would do.
This decision is a Dredd Scott level of decision, and it will lead to exactly the same place.
I don’t know about them specifically, but it will definitely bring unity among MAGA to some degree, by simply focusing our attention on a 75-80% issue.
The only advantage we have other than the leader of the executive branch, is our numbers. Psyops update the classic divide and conquer strategy, by getting us to split off in many directions–something Trump is good at himself. Better would be to focus on one or two weak points.
Picture a classic line of contact in a battle, in which you have a slight to fair advantage in numbers. Dividing your troops and attacking along the whole line will accomplish nothing, while getting your forces defeated. Conversely, massing your numbers and attacking at the enemy’s single weakest point of that line quickly, will allow you to break through and destroy them in detail.
One cannot return to a place never inhabited.
That group of grifter garbage would sell you the matches to burn America down.
remember when the really dumb black chick ruled with sanity for the first time in her life?
and remember when roberst repeatedly said he trades votes to give the court the appearance of non partisanship and unity instead of ruling based on the constitution (itself an impeachable and removal offense)?
now you know what happened. this was the most important one of a generation, and roberts sold us out to get a couple votes on unimportant S*t out of ketanji.
we will not vote our way out of this.
If you haven’t already done so, see Sundance’s article shown below, and send a note to the White House asking to require pregnancy tests for non-citizen females to enter any US territory.
Please spread the word!!!
https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/
Dear Mr President- & SEC Rubio
The birthright decision is a disaster…
PLEASE IMPLEMENT THIS PLAN.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/30/the-roberts-requirement-pregnancy-tests-for-u-s-travel-visas/
I read an article about rich Chinese men sending $$$ and bottles of their sperm to American citizen surrogates, for the implantation. When the baby is born, it is sent off to China, as an American citizen. What a farce! This is being done right now!
I didn’t save that article so I can’t give it here.
The moron wing of the court strikes. If I were a justice all it would take is finding what side Jumanji Jackson is going to come down on to know what the correct decision would be…..do the opposite.
I get it that music videos are sometimes not welcome on serious topic threads…
But this has been running thru my head all day about the SCOTUS and the US Senate and all politicians in general.
Their lying eyes…..
Whatever it takes to remove the “Family Unification” or reunification needs to be done immediately, I don’t care if it comes from Congress, the State Department, or the Chief Executive.
If these anchor babies are being dropped here to legitimize the invaders and offer them benefits, those draws must be ended. Posthaste. Illegal mama doesn’t get to stay because she importuned American taxpayers to pay for her baby’s birth.
This is going to get real ugly, real fast.
They are VISITORS. children born to visitors are still visitors. ONLY visitors.
Why are you acting like something new is going to happen? Literally nothing is changing from how it is currently.
“Literally nothing is changing from how it is currently.”
And the window to change it has slammed shut permanently in a masks-off moment. Gramsci’s “long march through the institutions” has reached its final phase.
Not necessarily but who knows. The Dredd-Scott decision was terrible and did not last.
This does not establish birthright citizenship. The Constitution defines the form of birthright citizenship, not the court. This is simply the SCOTUS ‘over ruling’ the US Constitution, again. This has been going on since 1803, when the SCOTUS unconstitutionally usurped the Constitution in order to make itself a co-equal branch of government. They stole something in Marbury vs. Madison, and they stole other things this past week. We did not elect these people.
“The Executive has the power of the sword. Congress has the power of the purse.
The courts merely have their opinions.”
—— Hamilton
A baby cannot give consent to anything. These idiots are imposing something on the baby about which the baby knows nothing, and therefore cannot give informed consent to being made a citizen of a place about which the baby knows nothing. This is absurd. Adults have to take citizenship and American history classes and take an OATH. A baby just has to evacuate the womb and PRESTO, instant citizen. This is so absurd I don’t know why anyone thinks it is real. Just because the verb BORN is in a sentence, we have babies being made AUTO-CITIZENS.
I have personally reserved my comments until I can feel a sense of calm regarding this decision. It was always going to turn out this way. Johnny boy Roberts, and Amy skanky Barrett were always going to rule thusly. They have intentionally abdicated their responsibilities as jurists. Absent an immediate and direct response to remove and/or eliminate them, our movement is obligated to fight against their idiotic tyranny every step of the way. We need to learn ourselves and to teach our children and grandchildren how to peacefully and violently resist the mandates of leftists, much as our ancestors resisted our British rulers. No compromise ever. No assinine, pathetic protests like from their side, just peaceful and violent refusal, on a case by case basis, to comply with their absurd demands. Every time, regardless of outcome. Make them fear seeking our compliance. It is exactly what brought us freedom from Britain, and will also from the EU/NATO/WEF alliance
Read this post ^^^ you fearful wussies. The fight is on. Unless you’re not up to it. And then we’ll win it without you while you bitch and moan how hard it is to win. And how unjust our government is while one man fights his arse off for his people. 🤦♂️🤷♂️🤡🖕
How are you going to “refuse” ballots from China nullifying your votes?
Roger Severino
@RogerSeverino_
So close. 5-4 decision favoring birthplace citizenship. Pres. Trump should immediately amend his EO to apply to U.S. Territories which are not auto-bound by the 14th Amendment. Trump should keep pushing the issue wherever he can and force the court to reckon with the logic of its decision. Will they overrule the insular cases next?
Cont…
F’ing outrageous.
I’d argue that SCOTUS lost its credibility, and standing, long ago when it irresponsibly threw out the 2020 TX (with 17 other states joining!) attempt/suit to hold the cheating battleground states to the standard of their OWN election laws (which were violated left and right during the 2020 election steal process).
The republic literally cannot survive when a dash to our soil by illegals to give birth constitutes BC. What an outrageous interpretation that results in just another stage of Constitutional crisis (we’ve already seen other instances; for example an outgoing Fed Gov Executive, with Congressional and Judicial in league, attempting to undermine/steal/disrupt the incoming POTUS Admin term; the 2016 Russia collusion ongoing through 2020 election steal coup).
POTUS47 Admin must/should immediately invoke national emergency and declare Biden era immigration policy as unconstitutional, as well as criminal and treasonous (they should have done this already, but now the BC SCOTUS decision provides immediate political capital to do so).
Mayorkas himself should be rolled up, cuffed, perp-walked, and subjected to military tribunal for the tens of millions of weaponized illegals imported during Biden regime.
Yes, but that would require guts. Our President would have to return to being the lion he once was. The lion we voted for three times. I don’t see that happening.
I haven’t felt this dejected since 2020. What recourse do we have? Rand Paul can virtue signal all he wants by introducing an amendment that will never get passed. No way the 2/3 threshold will ever be reached. They cant even pass the save act.
We also need to restructure welfare entitlement to exclude children born in US to illegal immigrants (at least til they are 18 if nothing else).
And restrict welfare to those children of legal immigrants unless the parents work for that welfare on the child’s behalf
+++
Those bastards!
I won’t pretend. Roberts, Barrett, and Kavanaugh had no legal basis for this decision. It was 100% about their fear of what would happen if they decided the case correctly.
Unfortunately you are 100% correct. And this is not role of the judiciary in our government. The judiciary is NOT to consider the impacts and implications of their decisions. Nor are they to consider what they believe the laws should say or mean. Those considerations are strictly limited to the legislative branch. But for far too long the legislative branch has been illegally allowed to delegate its legislative obligations to the judiciary branch.
The judiciary is tasked solely with interpreting the law AS WRITTEN as it applies to issues brought before them for deliberation. In this case, once again, the judiciary has made up legal standing and grounds to support their opinion of what they believe the laws OUGHT to say.
Sad.y at least for the present, the answer to this now lies with Congress
While angered and certainly disagreeing with the majority of SCOTUS, in actuality, their ruling does not change what is the current application of birthright citizenship, wherein anyone born here is automatically deemed a citizen. So the issue of birthright citizenship is the same today, after their ruling, as it was last month, last year, 10 years ago, etc. It is time now for Congress to make the difference, and legislate this issue.
The intent of the law no longer Matters. Consider the circumstances for this did not exist when the founders wrote the constitution. Justice Roberts the Bush gift that keeps on giving.
You are correct that Roberts, Barrett, & Kavanaugh are evil people. I have noticed that you use filthy language & then piously post prayers & other things that indicate you are part of a ritualized tradition-based denomination. Real Christians obey the Word of God. Now look at the Supreme Court. Theological Liberals like Trump think man is basically good, so he trusts evil men like Fauci, Iranian dictators, Zelensky, etc., thinking they will look after their people. Likewise, Trump is guided by Leonard Leo (Federalist Society) to nominate only Vatican adherents to the Supremes. (Gorsuch was Vatican until marrying an English high-church Anglican–practically the same thing.) The bedrock Vatican heresy is that their leader (now Marxists) determines truth, not the Bible. Therefore Roberts, Barrett, Kavanaugh are guided by the shifting, popular ideas of their buddies in the Washington cocktail set. Not one Evangelical on the Supreme Court! The Reformation was right: Sola Scriptura. Until the Word of God guides the court justices, we will continue to get travesties like these.
Well, God does know what goes on in the world of men and He did let this happen – maybe we can give Him some credit for always bringing good out of a bad situation for Men of Good Will!
BTW I am a Real Christian who believes in the Word of God – you may call me a Catholic & try not to offend all the other Catholics on this board. We too are Gods Children.
Alan Dershowitz said Tuesday that President Donald Trump demonstrated a stronger understanding of the Constitution than Chief Justice John Roberts in the Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship decision.
Dershowitz contended Roberts mischaracterized the question before the court by writing that the case was about whether the Constitution guarantees citizenship to children born to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily in the United States.
“Roberts started his decision by misleading the readers,” Dershowitz said
“President Trump is 100% right,” he said. “He can effectively overrule that decision without amending the Constitution simply by an act of Congress.”
https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/alan-dershowitz-donald-trump-supreme-court/2026/06/30/id/1261376/
I have thought for more than a decade that John Roberts’ legacy was going to be his stupid vote on Obamacare. Little did I know that that stupidity could possibly be exceeded, not just in a small way. How anyone in his (or her) right mind could arrive at the conclusion that those who break into the country and those who “travel” here for a vacay could bring citizenship to another simply by giving birth on our soil. Talk about taking a good faith amendment and screwing it royally–jeez, it never occurred to me that pure ignorance could be that rampant. Amy Comeylike Barrett (name changed to represent her hatred for the USA) was supposedly an intelligent person. On what planet? I was not a fan when she was going through confirmation as she came across as a little too :Miss Perfect but, after all, Mitch was a fan and, unfortunately, so was Donald!!
2 of Trump’s 3 SCOTUS judges have come back to bite American citizens in the backside more than once. The radical left (think Schmuck on the SCOTUS steps) intimidated the heck out of Barrett and Kavanaugh thus clouding any reasonable judgment that they may have had. Alas, for 250 years, we were a free, sane and wonderful country. Unfortunately, the “globalists” (Socialists/Communists at heart) have overtaken almost all of Europe, Australia and Canada leaving the USA as the last remaining hope for humanity. Roberts and Barrett just handed them their final victory with yesterday’s release. 250 years of freedom will likely not last another half a generation. God help us all!
I want all of her children, and Roberts’, and Kav’s, mu**ered by anchor babies. In front of their eyes. It should occur over several years, so they are traumatized & brought to extreme grief each time anew, spread the suffering out over a few years, untill they make the connection.
You reap what you sow, a$$*oles.
Like Sundance often writes live your best life. Perhaps one avenue is to do away with dual citizenship. That might give pause to many. One arm raising in the air with the other lifting. That seems America right now.
Chief Justice Roberts was NEVER to be trusted. And Amy Comey Barrett just isn’t what we all thought in the beginning.
We have a comprimised Supreme Court! And the Chief is the most comprimised of them all!
It took how many years to overturn ROE V WADE, this too will eventually be overturned. Will we live to see it or will this nation survive to see it??? Big questions. No answers.
Ordinarily I would agree, but this decision exacerbates the demographic changes which in turn changes the political views of the masses; the old populace favored freedom, capitalism, mostly Christianity or at least the right to choose, and the other benefits of our Republic.
The new peoples are mostly concerned with how to vote themselves more moolah from the efforts of others, the toxic effects of which result in an autocratic authoritarian type government. Our exceedingly well read founders knew that and designed something to counteract the get mine at all costs mindset.
All of their safeguards, one by one, have been dismantled, from voters needing to have an investment in the outcome to the popular election of Senators, depriving poorly represented states from correcting the issue.
The new population of “Americans” do not value what it really means to be American. They only care to pillage what they can and leave the carcass, as they have the places from which they come.
People like this are never going to care to have the original intent of a Constitutional Amendment replaced.
SCROTUS screwed up this time.
Roberts is completely compromised. Amy is just an idiot.
This is disgustingly blatant corruption….no wonder she’s anti-Trump – she’s being paid by the Bushies
From MJTruthUltra on X:
“Holy shyt…
More details are emerging about Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s book deal.. and it’s bad. Really bad…
On May 4, 2026, Barrett spoke at the George W. Bush Presidential Center in Dallas about her book Listening to the Law: Reflections on the Court and Constitution. The event was moderated by Bush Center President and CEO Shilo Brooks.
Her 2021 book deal (reported as a $2 million advance) was handled by the literary agency Javelin, the same agency also represented James Comey for his book A Higher Loyalty. https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/svg/1f440.svg
Javelin was co-founded by Matt Latimer (former Bush speechwriter) and Keith Urbahn (who served as Donald Rumsfeld’s chief of staff for several years after Rumsfeld left office).
Matt Latimer and Keith Urbahn are NOT Trump allies. They come from pre-Trump NEOCON Republican circles. Both openly critical of Trump.
Not to mention… Amy Coney Barrett’s father, Michael Coney, worked for 29 years as an attorney for Shell Oil, focusing on legal matters involving Gulf of Mexico offshore drilling. He was also active for over two decades in the American Petroleum Institute’s exploration and production law subcommittee.
—— offshore drilling in the Gulf was pioneered by companies tied to prominent political figures, including George H.W. Bush’s Zapata Petroleum and supported by Halliburton (where Dick Cheney later served as CEO).
Given these documented connections — a multi-million-dollar book deal brokered by agents who have been openly critical of President Trump, who rewarded a corrupt FBI director that assisted in the Presidential Coup, her father’s long career tied to the oil industry, and her participation in major Supreme Court decisions — Justice Amy Coney Barrett NEEDS to be investigated immediately for potential ties to bribery and corruption.”
Remember when President Trump got infected with covid the moment he publicly announced his nomination of Amy Coney Barrett? I believe that was a sign from the heavens to retract Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination.
Hah. You might be right.
Jeff Childers has a slightly more upbeat take…
SCOTUS didn’t settle birthright citizenship. But Kavanaugh said Congress can fix it by statute. Within hours, a senator reintroduced a Democrat bill. The game isn’t over — it just moved spaces.
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/inevitability-wednesday-july-1-2026?utm_campaign=email-half-post&r=y77n3&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
There has been only one other time in my life that I have had such a soul deep dread as this decision inspires. That time was when the kenyan was inaugurated.
I hope everyone understands that this was the plan all along. Trump is now off the hook to voters as well as congress to accomplish what was promised. We see little to no movement on any front except trade. Fraud was exposed by Elon then he was sidelined. Welfare tools along at accelerated speed. Muslims are only stopped by citizens. Communism grows exponentially as this fight comes to midterms. Then republicans will be off the hook completely. The dialogue will justify the position of authority not action.
We think those opposing trumps plans are his adversary soon we will see they are the plan. Fauci?
He cannot get a pass of “genius” while all this falls flat, these are not coincidental. Either he is or not.
The “doers” find themselves kicked out, doing what they said they were put in place to do. While the perpetrators of our demise continue on.
Only the lowest fruit is prosecuted and that is superficial blather.
Ukraine was never to be settled. Iran was a feint. Nobody who lived in Carters presidency believes what they shovel and rightfully so.
We pretend to believe that any election is legitimate, hopefully by now it’s apparent they were all fraud. The machine churns on grinding away at our freedoms while we work to build our prisons.
Answer me this, who and what do you work for? If you believe it’s for yourself or your family you are deceived.
Many will follow some will see this is all planned every ruling, every decision was never about what we think or believe. If it happens it’s because it’s planned that way.
I family used to have one income and lived well. Even retired at a decent age. Show me the betterment, the abundance of spare time now with these gadgets and high pay.
I know if you look you will see, it’s just nobody will look at reality. Because the discontent would overwhelm our society.
“The meaning of life” once you see it you go insane.
1866 congressional doc where originator of 14th said “foreigners or aliens do not get birthright citizenship”. Everyone save a copy NOW, History deleted! https://web.archive.org/web/20170228210602/https://www.loc.gov/law/help/citizenship/pdf/congressglobe_2890.pdf
https://x.com/1776general_/status/2069416861591072824
this entire post is worth reading for expanding the perspective.
https://open.substack.com/pub/coffeeandcovid/p/inevitability-wednesday-july-1-2026
This is going to put the nail in the financial coffin in Washington State. During COVID they expanded benefits to non-citizens and the Biden administration made it almost impossible to be an illegal. They handed out asylum seekers, victims of trafficking (made retroactive 2 years) and you did not need to claim you were a VOT, you just had to intend to claim VOT, and Refugees.
All of them got cash, food, medical and housing assistance. If they got jobs, then they could remain eligible for these programs because they use a different eligibility calculation to determine continued eligibility.
This resulted in layoffs for State employees and now the State is worse off budget wise and more State employees are going to be laid off.
However, they then turned around and hired contractors with Deloitte for a bunch of H1B1 workers who are paid on average $155 thousand per year.
My property taxes have gone up by 30% as have my homeowners insurance.
I retire in 4 years and I may be priced out of my home by then.
Ferguson is an evil communist genius whose only plan seems to be bankrupting our State. I just hope my social security is enough to survive on because I think my pension will be really iffy.
The blackety blacks are so completely clueless they can’t even understand Justice Thomas’dissent:
These people cannot be helped.
This is not merely a legal dispute over immigration policy.
It is a decision about the meaning of American citizenship, the consent of the governed, and whether the Constitution can be twisted to reward illegal entry and foreign birth tourism.
Part of the game. 47 always gets what he wants.
Reminder that Gorsuch takes turns playing the role of the 3 Stooges alongside Amy and Kavanaugh, so just because he joined the dissenting side today, doesn’t mean Gorsuch loves jumping the shark on anything involving Native Americans. Gorsuch gave half of Oklahoma away to Native Americans in 2020.