Like many of you I am profoundly angered by the Supreme Court decision that fractures our nation and conveys citizenship to the children of illegal aliens born in the United States. [PDF HERE] In fact, I was so angered to my core, I went for a long walk before doing any further commenting on the matter.
U.S. Citizenship is now determined by how good at violating our nation’s borders, by conniving, by scheming and by deception to create a qualified child where no adult qualification exists. This is the most detrimental decision by the Supreme Court in generations and will profoundly impact our nation.
There is no longer an apple, it’s all worms.
Today, the Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship – the guarantee of citizenship status to everyone born in the United States.
In a decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, five supreme court justices agreed with the challengers saying Trump’s order cannot be reconciled with the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which confers citizenship on anyone “born … in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”
(6-3) Writing for the majority, Roberts emphasized that the “children born of parents unlawfully or temporarily present in the United States” “satisfy both elements of the Citizenship Clause.” “Under the Constitution,” he concluded, “they are citizens at birth.”
Roberts was joined in the majority by Justice SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, BARRETT, JACKSON and KAVANAUGH.
Justice THOMAS filed a dissenting opinion with GORSUCH and ALITO.
SCOTUS BLOG – In his dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito called the ruling, “one of the most important decisions in the history of the Court” and “a serious mistake.” “Careful analysis of the text of the Fourteenth Amendment and the process that led to its adoption,” Alito argued, “shows that it does not degrade the concept of United States citizenship in this way. Instead,” he contended, “the Fourteenth Amendment confers citizenship on only those children who, at birth, owe allegiance solely to this country.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed with the result that the court reached – that the president’s executive order is invalid – but not its reasoning. In his view, Trump’s order “does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment” but does violate a federal law providing that children who are “born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” are U.S. citizens. Congress, Kavanaugh suggested, “could amend” that law “or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But,” he noted, “Congress has not yet done so.”
Justice Clarence Thomas penned a lengthy dissent, which Justice Neil Gorsuch joined. He called the majority’s account “not historically accurate” and said that it “adds to the sad history of the Fourteenth Amendment, which was designed and understood to secure equal rights for the freed blacks but has instead been repurposed for political projects that the Reconstruction Congress did not support.”
Gorsuch also wrote a separate brief dissent, in which he appeared to suggest that Trump’s executive order might violate the Constitution as it applies to the children of undocumented immigrants who intend to live in the United States permanently. “If those parents are not domiciled here,” Gorsuch queried, “then where are they domiciled? And if the answer is nowhere,” he continued, “how can we reconcile that conclusion with this Court’s longstanding recognition that every person is domiciled somewhere?” Because the challengers in this case have argued that Trump’s order is invalid in all circumstances, rather than just some, Gorsuch explained, “these questions may not be properly before us. But their answers are undeniably important to a Nation committed to a view of citizenship open to all children born here to parents who can call this country their home.” (SOURCE)
Consequences and possibilities to come in the next few articles on the matter.



“Congress, Kavanaugh suggested, “could amend” that law “or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But,” he noted, “Congress has not yet done so.”
Brett Kavanaugh concurred in the judgment to block the executive order but dissented from the majority’s constitutional reasoning, arguing the order violated federal statute rather than the Constitution
Congress again. Worthless, feckless, treasonous Congress. To get rid of birthright citizenship, Congress needs to pass it and The President needs to sign it and then maybe SCOTUS will back it.
First they have to grandstand in order to properly fundraise off of it. Then set up vehicles for revenue streams from its absence or presence. Then inside trade to the extent available. Then pass some half baked, unintelligible to the ordinary person legislation written by and for private attorneys that will never be enforced in its exclusionary aspects and will absolutely be to the detriment of US citizens.
Would be a much cheaper and quicker recovery to just hang them all.
Abolish the Supreme Court; so that the Democrats cannot pack it, not that it would make a difference.
Exactly – the only thing we can depend on Congress to do is the wrong thing. They are a sorry, worthless lot. I’d be ashamed to be a member. Traitors and thieves with very few exceptions.
S.D. – a question.
I recall you seem not a fan of an Article V Convention of the States.
However, I think this is a “break glass in emergency” moment.
IMHO, an Article V Convention of the States could be (but requiring strong, steadfast leaders)
Trump won 31 states outright, and 3 more were close, so we would need to cajole another 4 “purple” states to ratify.
And, Congress Not Needed.
Congress wouldn’t touch that with a ten foot pole. They can’t even get the SAVE Act passed.
Senator Eric Schmitt Missouri is now drafting such legislation
FWIW, Rand Paul already did.
A political stunt, a campaign issue to run on, little more.
He has been weighed, measured, and found wanting.
Dissents often show the way forward. or even concurrences give cause where to proceed next. This is definitely not settled law. Just a clarification of current operating terms. Teachers unions will be so disappointed they will lose their precious illegal cash cows.
I agree and wrote my useless Rep saying : The SC will follow if You and the Senate will make laws to STOP illegals from entering our country period. American citizens DONOT want every illegal entry, visa overstay, and birth tourism visitor to have children that WE end up supporting.
please add “craven” to your list.
Characterized by abject fear; cowardly. Cowardly; fainthearted; spiritless.
Similar: cowardly faint-hearted spiritless Unwilling to fight; lacking even the rudiments of courage; extremely cowardly.
I have learned to love Big Brother…
“He gazed up at the enormous face. Forty years it had taken him to learn what kind of smile was hidden beneath the dark moustache. O cruel, needless misunderstanding! O stubborn, self-willed exile from the loving breast! Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother.” ― George Orwell, 1984
This is called the Stockholm Syndrome. Why?
Is there not questions as to Robert’s illegal adoption and does not Barret have to adopted children from Haiti?
I, too. And, I know now what two plus two equals…
“How many lights do you see?”
The irritating thing is when the 14th was passed, it was understood it did not apply to Indians (indigenous people), or foreign diplomats. But somehow, random people who give birth in Guam are citizens.
I am not happy with these frightened or corrupt “justices.”
Or still in the Pacific there is an island where Chinese still give birth and they are instantly Americans and that is overlooked and should be shut down.
Roberts says Obamacare is a tax and birth tourism is legal.
Traitor. Compromised. Blackmailed.
I’m not happy either.
Are we there yet??
Our own precious citizenship is now devalued.
Roberts and Barrett have just opened Pandora’s box.
(Repost)
Gee,… these Supremes look just as determined to thwart We The People’s mandate as Oh Bam Ah’s Admin staff just after President Trump’s Bigly win in 2016.
They all look like they have been waiting 3 hours for lunch, haven’t been fed yet, and now they have to pose for pictures.
This was taken just before they found out that Barry and the Hag had hatched their Coup plot to take down newly elected PDJT and nullify his Mandate from We The People. Champaign (and Coke) flowed freely then and the entire gang of Coupers were all Smiles and Giggles. /s
Sadly, yes we are.
Even past that moment.
John Roberts has feet of clay.
And a brain to match!
No, stop being silly. This inot the hill America dies on. Not at all.
Dear Jaye…
Today is not the day to call me “silly”…
I would advise against it.
Holding onto that patience dear Betsy I see. I don’t think you’ve brought in any more bail money.
🤣
Close…tee hee.
Ha!!!! But I’m working on it 😎💕
Yep. Obamacare ‘tax’ and now our birthright sanctity given away. Two of the biggest hits to American wellbeing.
Both Roberts decisions. Roberts’s court.
No, there were legislative decisions. Blame Congress and the voters who put them in.
Roberts is my first choice.
Roberts really said SCOTUS does not prevent you from passing stupid legislation. If you passed it legally, it is not their job to toss it out.
It is SCOTUS responsibility to say that pursuant to the clear intent of the Congress that passed the 14th Amendment as well as clarity from members of that Congress that is documented, along with the basic meaning of what “under the jurisdiction of ” was understood to mean, the 14th Amendment does not confer citizenship on any and every child born on our soil.
There are / were two well known John Roberts: the subject and a prime time network news anchor. The only handwritten Epstein list I’ve seen was vociferously and convincingly rejected by the news anchor Roberts. The Obamacare fixer tax man has been guilty in my eyes ever since. His verdict reinforces my opinion.
Saipan.
And as adults they will be eligible to MAIL IN THEIR BALLOT FROM CHINA. A travesty called SCOTUS.
By your logic, the Second Amendment only applies to muskets.
The language is the language.
The decision was correct.
https://x.com/AndrewKolvet/status/2071988065326030931
“Official transcript from the US Senate on May 30, 1866. Senator Jacob Howard, who introduced the 14th Amendment:
“This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens…”
Also, Native American’s (Indians) were explicitly excluded as one of the justices dissents noted. How does Roberts handle that ? This is another BS decision by an overtly political Chief Justice.
Some media commentators are trying to paint a less negative picture by saying that we’re only 1 justice away from flipping the decision the other way. Unfortunately the true conservative justices are the oldest ones on the court and so the most likely to depart. If Pres. Trump gets the chance to fill another spot on that court he needs better advisors then the ones who gave us Amy Coney Barrett.
I suspect Barrett may have allegiance to the new pope from Chicago.
After doing a bit MORE due diligence I apparently have been fooled into unknowingly utilizing a fake news technique of presenting a truncated quote by Howard…..to alter context
This makes it appear as though Howard broadly excluded children of all “foreigners” or “aliens.”
In context (and as shown in the image), he was describing one narrow excluded group: children of foreign diplomats (who enjoy immunity and are not fully “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S.). He explicitly said the clause would include “every other class of persons.” 😳 🤷🏼
You prefer the narrow view, I prefer the broader view, along with the majority of SC justices, which has a long-standing practice going back to Wong Kim Ark.
How many other countries have a law like this?
Let’s be honest about what this is: socialism on stilts.
I have highlighted the countries most people would actually want to go to:
Comprehensive List of Countries with Unconditional Jus Soli
Sources (including Wikipedia, World Population Review, and others as of 2025–2026) generally align on these ~35 countries. Minor variations occur due to nuances like optional choice at age 18 or registration requirements in a few cases, but they are classified as unconditional.
North America:
Canada
Mexico
United States (exceptions for children of diplomats)
Central America & Caribbean:
Antigua and Barbuda
Barbados
Belize
Costa Rica
Cuba
Dominica
El Salvador
Grenada
Guatemala
Honduras
Jamaica
Nicaragua
Panama
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Trinidad and Tobago
South America:
Argentina
Bolivia
Brazil
Chile
Ecuador
Guyana
Paraguay
Peru
Uruguay
Venezuela
Africa:
Chad (child may choose at age 18)
Lesotho
Tanzania (with noted exceptions; practice may emphasize descent in some cases)
Oceania/Asia:
Fiji
Tuvalu
(Pakistan is sometimes included with exceptions, but recent legislative attempts to restrict it have been noted)
Where is the word “muskets” in the 2nd Amendment?
LOL, the same place where “or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press” defines “press” as being limited to the mechanical ones of the time.
In other words, nowhere. They want to limit interpretation of gun rights to what was available at the time, but don’t limit that “press” thing.
T t was not correct, but it stands as the current SCOTUS interpretation of that ambiguous language. Error can and will be overturned. Just like ROE vs Wade was constitutionally corrupt.
Look at how many years that took.
You can delete the “frightened.” They are corrupt and untouchable, without any term limits. What’s to fear?
Rope.
It is the first step in the right direction. Clarification of the 14th Amenment sambiguous terms. Now we can move forward with more clarity and reach the desired goals. No US citizens ship by meer default. No chain migration either. There is so much we can now do.
what ‘we’??? Congress is balless and gutless! Congress gets appointed by whoever has the most money, inc foreigners! Elections are an empty ritual, votes by whomever, whenever, from wherever. Justice is a facade, the Constitution is gleefully used as TP by half the county. We are being bled out! And our external enemies are shouting with joy as we are destroyed from within.
So tell me just who will fix this?
Options for saving this country’s once promising liberty are narrowing by the second.
I posted this on the daily thread but it’s worth posting here too. President Trump congratulates China’s President Xi on his citizenship win in the US Supreme Court.
The Supremes deserve his wrath they just destroyed the current US Republic.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/president-trump-takes-major-dig-supreme-court-congratulates/
The obvious first thing is to deny entry to any pregnant non citizen.
This of course is gone the instant we have a non MAGA president.
I agree, posted this in daily thread after news drop.
Make it a requirement before boarding any plane, ship or crossing any passport check point, you have to take a pregnancy test regardless of what sex you are identifying as today. Put the charge on their ticket and or fee, as the Rabbit Test Tax.
You throw a positive it is the same as testing positive for Eboli. Back you go. While it does not solve the problem already here, it might slow things down, until we get to that second round of taxation without representation contest of throwing an abusive government off.
Well if you thought the boarding process was bad enough then that would certainly add to it.
You would also need to supply the tests and have watchers monitoring
Only the visibly pregnant need to be humiliated publicly. One cannot stay in the US for 9 months on a tourist visa, and if they overstay, the mother and babe are sent home sans US birth certificate.
People have overstayed DECADES on tourist visas…
It won’t be that bad. They are going to be far to busy dealing with their own invasion. As for myself, with no intention of going near an airport for a number of reasons I don’t give 3 F’s. What logistics would you prefer?
If you are going to the states you better by god be unF’ed, or the tide rising with more invaders.
Since you won’t be flying it doesn’t matter to you?
Just being realistic.
It should not matter to you either, if you are on the US Pass Port sparky. Interlopers having their anchor babies in this nation does matter to me.
Sundance has a better way to implement this very requirement
https://xcancel.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/2072036180829601995#m
And he explains the politics & patriotism for doing that way.
https://xcancel.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/2072054616049721730#m
Covid Protocol applied to pregnancy and peeing on the stick at the airport, just to make sure. Like one poster in the thread said.
Everyone knows what today and yesterday’s rulings are about. Do not expect this country to be here for 300.
That may be the silliest and most invasive thing I have ever read on this site, and I have seen some doozies.
Good luck with that one!
Actually the border patrol denied entrance to a pregnant woman a couple of days ago.
Imvasive??? Good Lord, the country is being INVADED.
We tested for Covid. How stupid was that. Just a few years ago.
Oops saw your post too late. We think alike on that.
You on deck in an ER right now? The invasion is likely in your ER. Non citizens sucking up your time and resources. While residence that are paying for it are SOL.
Going to guess you are bleed out on Med Mal premiums, student loans, burn out. Toss in some insurance companies telling you how to practice medicine, while out of control hospital administrators run the joint like congress does this country. You have my condolences.
I wondered if dogs can be trained to detect preggos. So, I asked Grok:
Yes, dogs can be trained to detect pregnant women, primarily due to their extraordinary sense of smell.
Natural Sensing vs. Trained Detection
Natural sensing: Many dog owners report behavioral changes in their pets (e.g., increased sniffing of the belly, clinginess, protectiveness, or anxiety) even before a pregnancy test confirms it. This is supported by anecdotal evidence and expert consensus from veterinarians and behaviorists, though large-scale controlled studies are limited. Dogs also pick up on behavioral and routine changes in pregnant people.
Trained detection: Dogs are routinely trained for medical scent detection (e.g., cancer, low blood sugar in diabetics, seizures, or other conditions involving volatile organic compounds or hormonal shifts). The same principles apply to pregnancy-related scents. While there aren’t many publicized programs specifically for detecting pregnant women (unlike drug/explosive or disease-detection dogs), it is feasible and plausible with proper training using samples from pregnant vs. non-pregnant individuals.
Bet you complained that you had to have proof you didn’t have covid in order to fly. The test swab had to be taken/in 10 days wasn’t it? I just refused to fly.
And immediately, today, raid all of the “birth tourism” factories. Resulting in immediate deportation due to intent to defraud the United States.
Peter Schweitzer documented 500 – not a typo – different companies in China providing this service. Think how many facilities that means here, or on Guam or elsewhere.
Well, MAGA or non-MAGA, this quickly stops when you have a pregnant Israeli woman coming to the United States to attend her sister’s wedding or her mother’s funeral.
By the way, Border Patrol will hire gynecologists?
At some point in time, very soon, we are going to have to do whatever has to be done to salvage our Country. Stop the nice guy shyt and make things right
Your exaggerations are misplaced. This is more serious tha s n all the covid bans that wet easily.re put in place.
Are your fingers greasy or are you fat?
No it doesn’t stop for anyone from anywhere & here’s why.
https://xcancel.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/2072054616049721730#m
Illegals should be prohibited from welfare or any other kind of taxpayer-funded benefits.
Employers should be prosecuted for hiring them.
Make it uncomfortable for them to be here.
Any woman of child bearing age. 55+
Or neighbors with uteri.
We might need to go further than that and deny all women visitors entry until this is resolved. How are we gonna be able to tell if they’re pregnant or not? Just ask and hope they don’t lie?
“Roberts Rules” for entry. Show the certified proof before you’re allowed entry.
Here’s why: https://xcancel.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/2072054616049721730#m
These days you might have men who could get pregnant.
Also, what about women over 50? Very low chance for them to be pregnant.
Border Patrol has been denying entrance at the border to all illegals
Agreed and make them bare their bellies in public.
Stop letting the teachers control our elections.
LOL. Courtesy of Grok, made in an instant just by asking for it. Click to see::
When I spelled preggo with one ‘g’ it made a sign in Portuguese meaning “No Nails.”
It’s time to greatly minimize anyone coming into the country.
Gorsuch also wrote a separate brief dissent, in which he appeared to suggest that Trump’s executive order might violate the Constitution as it applies to the children of undocumented immigrants who intend to live in the United States permanently. “
I had to read this a few times to make sure I wasn’t seeing things.
So children know where they want to live?
Worse, I think Gorsuch meant that the parents intend to reside in the US permanently, illegal or otherwise.
Where the parents say where they live. Just say whatever, at whatever time, and we handout citizenship like candy if they say the right things.
While the majority established a blanket rule that all children born on U.S. soil (with very traditional exceptions like diplomats) are citizens regardless of their parents’ status, Gorsuch’s suggests a potential future where citizenship depends on the parents’ intent.
Under Gorsuch’s framework, a child born to undocumented parents who plan to live in the U.S. permanently would be a citizen because their parents are “domiciled” here. However, a child born to someone in the country purely temporarily, with no intent to stay, might theoretically be excluded if Congress were to pass a specific law targeting that group.
Gorsuch is pointing out what a disastrous mess is this decision. No logic. Not constitutionally based…. a retarded decision.
A Democrat decision.
Just like apparently, the first words of mommy and daddy at age 1 or 2 are to be interpreted as, “I want a sex change.” I guess the idea being, if a 1 year old boy says mommy, it’s obvious he wants to be a girl.
Am I confused when reading the 14th amendment that a child born to illegal non citizens is of the jurisdiction of its parents ?
If two Americans go overseas be it in the military or otherwise and has a child that child is an American which is the same as a non citizen who gives birth in the U.S.
There is non such thing as birthright citizenship or an anchor baby being an instant American.
UD Embassies and US military bases overseas have always been American soil with American parents while stationed there.
Maybe I am not understanding your post?
Right on embassies/consulates, wrong on overseas military bases. Military bases on foreign soil are occupied under a Status of Forces agreement, basically a lease with the host country.
I espy a new avenue of citizenship: Women abroad who give birth and announce that the baby intends to reside in the US permanently.
The SCOTUS is working like the US Senate where CJ Roberts can count on Kavanaugh and Barrett following him like little dogs most of the time.
This is ridiculous beyond serious consideration. It is as idiotic as Obamacare being a “tax”. Damn that man Roberts he is courrupt.
Damn that man Roberts he is compromised.
But never exposed why. It is the only way to move forward. Expose the corruption and hold anybody, somebody high profile accountable. Omar still rockin when she is nothing but fraud who has stole millions in tax payer dollars. As a citizen I am disgusted that no one can pay a price for anything.
Expose Roberts secret and let him sit in judgement then. This country can go tell everyone else how it is but we can’t clean up our own country. It is grotesque corrupt.
Maybe Roberts had a little talkie talkie with the D rats and was told: we will give you the Tranny issue (we will not riot and burn your houses down if you vote for it) and you give us the Birthright issue. I can see that shit happening.
Boasberg is a Roberts operative, which is all anyone needs to know.
For John Roberts, John Thune, Mitch McConnell, and every single anti America saboteur…
You are not one of us.
(Repost)
Breathes the man, with soul so dead,
Who never to himself hath said,
This is my own, my native land!
Whose heart hath ne’er within him burn’d,
As home his footsteps he hath turn’d,
From wandering on a foreign strand!
If such there breathe, go, mark him well;
For him no Minstrel raptures swell;
High though his titles, proud his name,
Boundless his wealth as wish can claim;
Despite those titles, power, and pelf,
The wretch, concentred all in self,
Living, shall forfeit fair renown,
And, doubly dying, shall go down
To the vile dust, from which he sprung,
Unwept, unhonour’d, and unsung.
~Sir Walter Scott
Well selected and said Betsy
the main takeaway in all the recent supreme court cases is that to preserve this great country patriots must remain ever vigilant.
always, always.
“I am from the government and I am here to help!” – Reagan’s Most Terrifying words in the English language.
Some days, there are just not enough expletives to fill the vacuum!
Not that it will happen, but Congress needs to get off their behinds and fix this!
Grandstanding Senator Paul submitted a constitutional amendment today to end any woman dropping a load on US soil makes the child a citizen.
His amendment has as much chance as a snowball in Phoenix, Az. today.
Wish Paul would go way.
It doesn’t need to be a constitutional amendment.
You familiar with the no way in hell theory…..?
I wish I had been born in one of the homes that these Judges are living in. I would show up and demand my bedroom back, and demand to be attended to as needed. After all… it’s where I was born!!!
SCOTUS rules from each according to their ability, to each according to their need is American law.
Across the world, millions of women are being recruited to get pregnant and when well into the term be transported to the US to give birth. It would not surprise me if “blue” cities set up special birthing hospitals to greet these newborn but fully fledged Americans.
How many millions are pregnant now? Will that be excuse for non deportation?
Could start with shutting down the ports of entry in those cities that have airports. No Customs agents there, no receiving of international flights.
The immigration act of 1924 was in place for 28 years maybe it needs a revisit
Would have to seat an entirely new Congress with no continuity to the previous one. Might get a bill like that through then.
Nothing that a pandemic and lock down wouldn’t solve – not that it would ever happen :/
CA does already cater to the “birthing” visitor: hospitals, hotels, welcome kits…
OK, Supremes,…… Donald can just issue his new Ex O that demands an instant and quick pregnancy test on all female visa holders Before they are allowed to board their flight from all foreign departure air ports. This should cut down on the Anchor Baby Biz, pronto, as long as pregnant females (aka, Women) are prohibited form entering the USA while in an Expectant nature.
No test results, no fly,… No more Problem! Think again, Chief Justice Roberts!
I guess so now that the court has finally defined what a woman is.
“Pee on the stick!” For EVERYONE entering the U.S., since we cannot tell men from women.
Shocking and yet not so.
Not sure how Congress could amend what is now found in the constitution… pray we don’t have to wait 50 years like Roe v Wade for wisdom to return to the court. Thanks Roberts et al – you are just great.
Pitchforks now, sir?
Tar and feathers and rails?
I am wondering if this decision, that most of us disagree with is also based on a STRICT interpretation of the 14th amendment. After I also took a walk to calm down and thought about this decision, it occurred to me that the SCOTUS is always supposed to review the constitutionality of laws without regard to the intent of the law in the constitution and perhaps in this case, they actually did that. Maybe the solution to this question of abuse of the intent of the amendment should be a modification to the amendment that clarifies what it should have said in the first place had the abuse been taking place at the time. Or as Justice Kavanaugh seems to be indicating in his dissent, modifying the existing federal law governing this or enacting new legislation to provide exceptions to the birthright citizenship for illegals. In either case, this may not be the end of it but it would certainly be a good idea to get this done while we have both houses and/or before POTUS Trump’s term ends.
I agree with you. This was never going to be fixed with an EO. We need legislation passed pronto that addresses this. Instead of going on constant vacations, maybe they could spend time fixing this. I bet if you polled people, this would be an 80/20 issue.
We can’t even get the Repukes to vote as a block for the SAVE Act! It could be a 99/1 issue; they don’t give a damn what we want, as long as they can hobble President Trump.
Too bad you can’t impeach them for pretending to actually represent their voters. Amy KAREN Barrett pretended she was MAGA and a die-hard conservative until she got on SCOTUS and let her mask fall. I suspected she’d be trouble seeing the two Haitian kids she adopted for virtue signal points. She LOVES belonging to the Woke Girls Club! And Roberts – God only knows what filth they have on him!
A pox on all of them!
And pray unceasingly for our President – the only man in the arena.
We may have both Houses but we sure as hell don’t control them. I must imagine that PDJT must have known that this would not have passed and would have had a 2nd plan in place.
The problem is that this law—like many from the Democrats, RINOs, and deep state—is designed to harm Americans and America.
I no longer consent to be governed by these people..
That’s what they said about the Labour Party.
This may sound draconian. Create a law that states any pregnant woman receiving pregnancy care must show proof of citizenship.
More draconianism,… if found to be a non-citizen, the non-citizen mother’s baby most be aborted if the mother refuses to voluntarily agree to immediate deportation, sans appeals. The mother, or her Baby Biz or NGO sponsors must pay for the abortion.
Uh, perhaps deport the instead.
Connngresss….. oh conngress????
Clearly the intent of this last election was to put America back on track being America. Enter President Trump. A foundational element to his platform was ending that bullshit and we elected him to do just that. I knew the 3 Libs were going to dissent but……………….. I have no further words.
The Liberty Tree is getting thirsty.
The compromised SCOTUS basically ruled that violation of the law can be lawful.
Its All Staged BS
Are we a sovereign nation? Do we get to choose who enters our country? Do we have the right to send back people who have entered our country illegally? Does that include their progeny, even as egg, sperm or fetus which/whom also entered illegally while inside the person who entered illegally? Does a minor child follow the parent, wherever they are domiciled?
Yes is the answer to all.
So we promote and execute a national referendum vote to CLARIFY the current 14th wording to unambiguously deny, discourage and criminalize any attempts at birthright citizenship .
As to Congress, we the people are no longer citizens, but subjects!
Thanks, Federalist Society – thanks a lot.
Amen.
So when a Communist becomes President, he or she will now let the 3rd world invade the Country have millions and millions of children and in one generation the Country is over thanks to the gutless Supreme Court. Hell, if I was a 3rd worlder I would be invading this Country by the thousands everyday and overwhelming us by sheer numbers.
Now we are left to Congress to fix this, good luck with that, with all those Rinos in there.
” and overwhelming us by sheer numbers.”
That is already in progress Frankie……
If the baby is a newborn American citizen then what about the mother? Can the mother be deported? I know it sound cruel, but it is cruel for 5 judges to think someone births a baby here it now lives here as an American citizen ~ free of charge.
Isaiah 5:19-21
New King James Version
19
That say, “Let Him make speed and hasten His work,
That we may see it;
And let the counsel of the Holy One of Israel draw near and come,
That we may know it.”
20
Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;
Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness;
Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
21
Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes,
And prudent in their own sight!
And one day, there was a fire.
And before anyone gets too uppity, FBI, It’s a quote from the movie “Joe Kidd”
I”m with Sundance on this one i am going for a long walk to clear my head i value this site to much to print what is racing through my head love you guys be well stay strong
REDDOG OUT
So, per Barrett this is something CONgress must do so we are screwed.
A criminal, a pantywaist and 4 airheads; predictable. There is nothing more dangerous than a fool with power. See: Biden, Joe.
You can’t legislate your way out of Communism. Nor tyranny
Just sayin
In a mere 48 hours the Supreme Court has taken two big dumps on America.
She looks as though the demon in her has finally surfaced.
https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2026/06/30/scotus-affirms-birthright-citizenship-rejects-trumps-reform/
Kavanaugh and Barrett are on Trump. Who advised him on those nominations? Disappointing to say the least. Congress can fix this but they won’t. The Republicans are cowards.
Eric Daugherty
@EricLDaugh
🚨 JUST NOW: Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis DROPS this line on the Supreme Court
“Judicially mandating that foreigners are entitled to birth US citizens against the wishes of the people as reflected in law means we cease to be our own rulers.”
Video linked…
Since Roberts used Kim Von Ark lets use it to remove the two appointees to the Supreme court made by Obama. Kim Von Ark defines natural born citizen as born here to CITIZEN parents. He was not eligible so lets undo his stuff.
The Trump administration should implement a full stop on ALL immigration until Congress passes legislation to address this.
Our Government HATES us and our Country.
And has since 2008, 2000, or 1992–if not long before.
Let’s re-open the borders while we’re at it and abolish ICE. F all.
Don’t jest,…. that’s their desire now and if they could now, they would.
Hit them with the Anti-Communism laws passed by Congress in 1940 and again in 1954,… the Alien Registration Act 1940 and the Communist Control Act of 1954.
Opening USA’s borders (ect.) to illegal alien trespassers is an Overt Act to attempt to Overthrow the legitimate American Govt, which is prohibited under these Acts.
According to tim pool at timcast.com,,,trump will be imprisoned, we will be marginalized, we no longer have a country. By this time next year, IMHO, Christians, Jewish and heterosexual people will be stripped of everything and put into some form of monitoring detentions. I have counted the cost, I will obey God. If it costs me my life,,,well, ok. Me and my house will serve the LORD.
Eric Daugherty
@EricLDaugh
🚨 BREAKING: Following the Supreme Court’s pro-birthright citizenship ruling, Border Czar Tom Homan says immigration enforcement will SURGE
QUADRUPLE DOWN!! 🔥
“Now, we STEP UP *MORE* enforcement — even though we’re doing record now — we need to do MORE! And not only that, we need to really buckle down on birth tourism.”
“We have many investigations on birth tourism, but we need to triple, quadruple down on that!”
Cont and video…
💯 🎯 💕 I love his man.
So INS doesn’t allow prego women into the country! Does that solve the problem.
The 14th Amendment, let no good deed go unpunished.
“JUSTICE THOMAS, with whom JUSTICE GORSUCH joins, dissenting” begins on page 62 of the PDF:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-365_4hdj.pdf
I wonder how many of the justices supporting this decision were afraid of a national revolt by the left if they’d done otherwise.
BTW, I expected this, and not because it’s a correct interpretation in the best interests of the US. Because of the above.
What are the dangers to a nation of women illegally in that nation or present as a tourist or on a temporary visa being able to birth children who are automatically deemed to be citizens of that nation even when the fathers are also not citizens of that nation?
Groks’ answer:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/30/june-30th-2026-presidential-politics-trump-administration-day-527/comment-page-2/#comment-12668690
It pays to be a pessimist. You can never be disappointed, only pleasantly surprised.
Eric Daugherty
@EricLDaugh
🚨 JUST IN: Senate Republicans are facing massive pressure to RE-FILE *DEMOCRAT* Sen. Harry Reid’s ban on birthright citizenship for illegal aliens, from 1993
FILE IT NOW!
Cont….
I heard something on WLS, The Big 89-was busy driving and only half paying attention, that the next thing the black robes will be evaluating is related to the AR15 weapon and is it covered by the Second Amendment…
That will be the truly real slippery slope.
This was a lingering, malingering, legal ambiguity finally finally cleared up. .
…..all persons, subject to the jurisdiction there of………… what the heck did that even mean and why the comma?
Now we can attack this issue head on. Finally.. Good. Onwards. Citizenship is not just a convenience granted by squatting on our sacred soil. Nor a consolution prize awarded emotionally to “hardworking’ law breakers.
Close our borders tight as drum. All entrants must prove a negative pregnancy test, all women and all men. All entrants must post bond and have a financial sponsor with proof of independent health insurance .
Few counties allow birthright citizenship. We can learn from their best practices that keeps this out. Start by listing countries that do allow this, and those who do not allow this. Divert all pregnant non-citizen entrants to these other countries. Let them know this up front.
I think at least part of our job is to show that birth tourism is a legitimate issue that must be addressed.
I know Peter Schweizer included this issue in his most recent book, The Invisible Coup. Does anyone have a good article summarizing the extent to which this is happening?
This is the philosophy of Boston mayor and globalist Harvard grad Michelle Wu enshrined as federal law—what a world.
Just about the Chinese version:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/30/june-30th-2026-presidential-politics-trump-administration-day-527/comment-page-2/#comment-12668748
And there’s this posted by Jake below:
https://thefederalist.com/2026/06/30/scotus-says-babies-of-illegal-aliens-ccp-birth-tourists-are-us-citizens-because-of-magic-dirt/
The United States of America…. the entire world’s dumping ground… :(:(
How do I know this?? – Our SC said so!!!
The Supremes Court has not only conjured up a forth branch of government, now they have conjured up ‘magic dirt’.
https://thefederalist.com/2026/06/30/scotus-says-babies-of-illegal-aliens-ccp-birth-tourists-are-us-citizens-because-of-magic-dirt/