Like many of you I am profoundly angered by the Supreme Court decision that fractures our nation and conveys citizenship to the children of illegal aliens born in the United States. [PDF HERE] In fact, I was so angered to my core, I went for a long walk before doing any further commenting on the matter.
U.S. Citizenship is now determined by how good at violating our nation’s borders, by conniving, by scheming and by deception to create a qualified child where no adult qualification exists. This is the most detrimental decision by the Supreme Court in generations and will profoundly impact our nation.
There is no longer an apple, it’s all worms.
Today, the Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship – the guarantee of citizenship status to everyone born in the United States.
In a decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, five supreme court justices agreed with the challengers saying Trump’s order cannot be reconciled with the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which confers citizenship on anyone “born … in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”
(6-3) Writing for the majority, Roberts emphasized that the “children born of parents unlawfully or temporarily present in the United States” “satisfy both elements of the Citizenship Clause.” “Under the Constitution,” he concluded, “they are citizens at birth.”
Roberts was joined in the majority by Justice SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, BARRETT, JACKSON and KAVANAUGH.
Justice THOMAS filed a dissenting opinion with GORSUCH and ALITO.
SCOTUS BLOG – In his dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito called the ruling, “one of the most important decisions in the history of the Court” and “a serious mistake.” “Careful analysis of the text of the Fourteenth Amendment and the process that led to its adoption,” Alito argued, “shows that it does not degrade the concept of United States citizenship in this way. Instead,” he contended, “the Fourteenth Amendment confers citizenship on only those children who, at birth, owe allegiance solely to this country.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed with the result that the court reached – that the president’s executive order is invalid – but not its reasoning. In his view, Trump’s order “does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment” but does violate a federal law providing that children who are “born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” are U.S. citizens. Congress, Kavanaugh suggested, “could amend” that law “or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But,” he noted, “Congress has not yet done so.”
Justice Clarence Thomas penned a lengthy dissent, which Justice Neil Gorsuch joined. He called the majority’s account “not historically accurate” and said that it “adds to the sad history of the Fourteenth Amendment, which was designed and understood to secure equal rights for the freed blacks but has instead been repurposed for political projects that the Reconstruction Congress did not support.”
Gorsuch also wrote a separate brief dissent, in which he appeared to suggest that Trump’s executive order might violate the Constitution as it applies to the children of undocumented immigrants who intend to live in the United States permanently. “If those parents are not domiciled here,” Gorsuch queried, “then where are they domiciled? And if the answer is nowhere,” he continued, “how can we reconcile that conclusion with this Court’s longstanding recognition that every person is domiciled somewhere?” Because the challengers in this case have argued that Trump’s order is invalid in all circumstances, rather than just some, Gorsuch explained, “these questions may not be properly before us. But their answers are undeniably important to a Nation committed to a view of citizenship open to all children born here to parents who can call this country their home.” (SOURCE)
Consequences and possibilities to come in the next few articles on the matter.



Senator Rand Paul
@SenRandPaul
Months before the Supreme Court ruled, I saw this coming. I knew lasting change on birthright citizenship wouldn’t come from waiting on the courts, so I filed a constitutional amendment earlier this year. This decision proves real reform must go through the amendment process.
Cont…
Rand is campaign fundraising.
Birthright citizenship Constitutional amendment will never get passed.
Rand is now a complete fool if he thinks any kind of constitutional amendment would ever get passed these days. It can be done without going through that process by attacking the ruling piece by piece. Senator Schmitt is already drafting legislation.
Rand is a libertarian. They’re all about the 💰💰 without any restrictions of any kind on anything.
Our owners want more slaves
This guy is a piece of work, grandstanding again. 🙄
A Constitutional Amendment will do nothing to fix issues when you have people twisting what is plain language and clear concepts well understood for centuries to suit narrow purposes.
We do not need any more stinkin’ amendments. They are always a Trojan horse, full of subversive globalist huns.
Repeal. The 17th first, and the 14th while we are at it..
It is clear that there is no semblence of representive government or preservation of the Constitution in the 3 Branches. That leaves We the People. Who else if we will not?
Constitutional amendment? Ha.
Rand, Sir … Americans aren’t dumb anymore. Many never were and many now are learning.
Rand Paul can go piss off. That crooked moron is fundraising and lying.
I don’t understand why everyone is throwing Rand Paul under the bus. As if we have any chance of getting a number over 50 of truly honorable Senators. Mr. Paul is one of my favorites, and his father was who originally drew me to the Republican party. It’s as if everyone has to be absolutely perfect of they get a s**t storm thrown at them. I’d say he’s one of the more honorable our country has seen in some time. So what if Trump, who I also very much admire, needs to cuss him out on occasion. That’s okay too. I think one of the more endearing features of the ‘MAGA’ movement is that we don’t all have to agree, in lock-step, on everything. We can have challenging debates and, on occasion, agree to disagree. I think this is a good thing. That’s my opinion and I’m sticking with it. God bless y’all. Keep thinking for yourselves!
Was the main confusion in the 14th Amendment “subject to the jurisdiction of.”
Grok AI:
Yes, the main point of confusion (and ongoing debate) in the 14th Amendment revolves around the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” in its Citizenship Clause.
The exact text from Section 1 (ratified in 1868) states:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
This clause was primarily intended to overturn the Dred Scott decision and secure citizenship for formerly enslaved people and their descendants.
So, there’s the original intent.
Wonder how all black Americans are feeling about this?
This abomination of a decision renders the language “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” in Section I of the 14th Amendment meaningless.
Under either a strict construction or originalism approach, the Supreme Court should have upheld President Trump’s executive order banning “birthright” citizenship.
Sad such a cowardly ruling is issued days before this great Nation celebrates its 250th birthday.
Just as bad as Dred Scott
A series of cowardly rulings by Roberts. The tax is not a tax is a tax. Roberts must step down.
That’ll happen right after he’s impeached or takes his last breath.
“confers citizenship on anyone “born … in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”
HOW is a newborn [minor] child of a woman here illegally “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”, when the jurisdiction can expel the illegal parent?
,”…and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”
If they are here illegally, they are NOT!!!!!!
It means that the illegals are Subject to the jurisdiction (Country or Nation) from which they came,… Not that of the USA.
Mock CJ, Roberts and his Supreme idiot pals in black robes.
The child cannot inherit allegiances to the United States as the mother cannot bestow what she did not first possess, the same presumably as the father.
However, this is separate from citizenship granted by statute or essentially an act of Congress by legislation.
Common Sense. A child born in the United States has automatic citizenship if:
A. one or both parents are US Citizens.
B. one or both parents have been issued permanent status in the United States, but are not yet citizens.
Children not eligible for birthright citizenship: All others.
The Left is celebrating like they won a Super Bowl. TDS on full display.
Edit: I have to add this comment.
So, 2 people can conspire to enter the US illegally, have a child on US soil, and then be free from deportation because we cannot deport illegals and separate them from their citizen baby? That is what they just green-lighted. Could any court decision, written right before the 4th of July, be more harmful to the long-term interests of the United States?
They won much more than a superbowl.
Not really. They have proven themselves unfit. Not sure if they are ignorant to the costs we have borne or if they think we are ignorant. My first thought was each of them needs a massive upgrade in personal security. My 2nd thought – I just don’t want to go there.
People on US soil with a green card (permanant residence) have not yet gained citiznship to extend to thier children – no different than than someone here on a tourist visa.
It all seems moot with a Congress and Supreme Court under control of out nation’s mortal enemies.
The probability of getting a Constitutional amendment to fix this, is ZERO and Kavanaugh knows this. There are many people particularly ones in power who want to destroy the country. Do I think there will be another revolution to stop them, maybe some attempt when it is too late.
“Congress, Kavanaugh suggested, “could amend” that law “or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But,” he noted, “Congress has not yet done so.”
Kavanaugh is saying Congress could pass a law, not a constitutional amendment.
Unless the GOP takes the House and the Senate by a good majority that is not going to happen. No Democrat will vote for such a law and 3-7 Republicans won’t either.
When people show you who they are Believe them.
We have been tempered yet again.
Fight Fight Fight
We desperately need ballot measures and We desperately need lawyers to help us write them.
Barrett is a traitor to her nation and a prime example of why women shouldn’t serve on the SC. Shame on Trump for putting her there.
There are five women on the court.
I rest my case
And all 5 voted incorrectly…
How many decisions by the women on the Supreme Court are not based on careful, cogent reasoning but on feelings?
It appears to me that there is a built in bias in the Supreme Court, not one that favors logic but politics/ideology.
Women should never serve as judges. Period. Call me what you will.
Realist? Pragmatist?
I’m a woman – and I concur!
Roberts Requirement for admission to the USA. Excellent idea.
Yes, I saw that X post too.
https://xcancel.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/2072036180829601995#m
That might be one way to do it.
More tinder for the box that is going to ignite one day…sooner than many think.
if part of the class action members in this case were unborn babies lets use it to get rid of abortion
SO a homeless pregnant woman who sneaks into my basement and has her child, her kid is now part of my family and I have to provide food and shelter for them both?
You got it!
SPIT!!!
And I’m a woman!
This has echoes of Proposition 187 in California.
The citizens of CA voted to eliminate all public benefits to illegal aliens, other than immediate lifesaving care.
The state Supreme Court overturned it.
Governor Pete Wilson started the judicial fight to defend it but the republicans lost the Governorship and we have run aground on the left coast and been sinking ever since under one party rule.
Business wants unlimited, unskilled, cheap labor.
Democrats want masses of “Gimmedats” for unlimited ballots.
And the citizen gets screwed.
Stephen Miller is from CA I believe, so he is intimately familiar with our downfall in CA.
I hope he has a plan.
Red states must make a stand and get legislation or a amendment passed or we are done.
We can’t secure our elections and we just ripped open and left bare the security of our future as a nation.
The issue isn’t the illegal alien as an individual.
The issue is mass migration used as an economic and cultural cudgel used to lay waste and beat to death the organic society that flourishes when free people interact out of desire and mutual benefit.
Well, let’s not forget who appointed the last two liberal justices
What the hell did these two idiots on the Supreme Court just do.
What happens when some poor schlep runs to our embassy and just says her kids were born in the US.
Is our state dept gonna have to jump through hoops to figure this out?
How the hell do we know if the kid was born on US soil?
I’m sure there’s been some people born outside a hospital.
What about voting?
Do we just start sending absentee ballots all over the world?
How about social security and welfare?
Good grief.
What have these idiots done?
They put all printers on blast globally when the Autopen President withdrew from Afghanistan and allowed all the global trash a free pass
Planned destruction of our country. The only happy people are the useful idiots, the entitled scavengers replacing the population, and the few elites who will benefit massively.
There just aren’t adequate words to describe the stunning, malevolent ignorance of the majority opinion.
SoldiersMom Out.
I was pretty down last night as many conservatives have prepared me for this likely decision coming today.
We must fight this outcome the same way we did the Roe v Wade one.
However, this decision seems beyond eventually having another SCOTUS reversal like Dobbs. It was too clearly stated.
There may be many actions to slow the effect, but it seems that it will clearly take a constitutional amendment to put it in permanent stone.
Maybe that is the best fight, if we can achieve victory. No easy task, may fail many times, but we should never give it up. It took decades to fix the Roe v Wade decision.
If SCOTUS had ruled the other way in Trump’s favor, a future liberal court could have reversed it a few years from now.
If it becomes a constitutional amendment it will be too clear for a liberal court to mess with it.
The public needs to understand the repercussions and nonreversable damage this ruling has caused…
And we need to fight, fight, fight until it is fixed….no matter how long.
1000 percent.
So how do they coerce this ruling out of the 14th? Unreal. We know exactly what the 14th intended and it wasn’t this pile of excrement.
for those interested john eastman has an excellent article on today’s decision at “american mind.” very wonky.
also, if you want to go whole hog keep scrolling over at “american mind” to 6/26/2026 and read michal anton’s looooooong article. then buy, read and study the West book he discusses.
it’s worth your time and effort. at least it was for me.
Make no mistake. We are at war with the judiciary
Did John Roberts first discuss this with his buddy, Norm Eisen?
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-14/
Section 5 – The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
https://immigrationhistory.org/item/1924-indian-citizenship-act/
This law stipulated that all Native Americans born in the United States were automatically citizens by birth. Native Americans were the last main group to gain this right set forth in the Fourteenth Amendment.
If congress can legislate what group of people can be considered as citizens, why can’t they do the same for excluding a group who entered the country illegally?
Retired Magistrate here: This is not the first case in which the Supreme Court applied the 14th Amendment to children born on U.S. soil to immigrants regardless of the immigrants status.
In landmark case of U.S. vs. Wong Kim Ark (1898) the Supreme Court ruled 6-2 that the Citizenship clause of the fourteenth amendment must be interpreted according to English common law principles of right of the soil. The court clarified that individuals born within the territorial boundaries of the United States are automatically subject to the jurisdiction thereof at birth, regardless of their parents race, nationality or eligibility for naturalization.
The Supreme Court directly applied the Wong Kim Ark ruling to strike down President Trump’s executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship.
So, the court was not going to overturn 158 years of precedent.
And Supreme court decisions and precedent are never wrong….
Sometimes a long standing wrong needs to be corrected.
We have lost “checks and balances” to judicial totalitarianism. “We the People” no longer count.
President should establish a new order. To restore checks and balances thus reducing the power of self-important elitists, hereby VETO this judicial decision. The court does not have Constitutional authority for this ruling. This VETO shall stand unless overruled by a 2/3rds vote in Congress.
This shall therefore reestablish the vital checks and balances in our republic.
What about the millions that are already here? How about a law that requires proof of citizenship before any pregnancy care? Sounds horrible, but what other choice do we have? If they’re illegal, swoop them up and send them home.
And in the near future, all these little anchor brats will be of voting age, so thanks to our stellar SCOTUS, they can all vote by mail from China, Somalia, Haiti, or anywhere else they happen to be. Talk about foreign interference in our elections!!
Thanks, SCOTUS. I hope whatever you 6 traitors sold your sorry souls for was worth it!
I was sadly under the hope and assumption that the Court would just clarify what “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” actually means as it was originally, textually written.
As a child of immigrant parents who followed all the rules and sacrificed much to come here legally so their children would be US citizens all I feel is rage.
When the decision came down and I actually read the words Robert’s wrote I, too, was so furious I began working and doing things to distract myself to let the rage pass. The ignorance of so many Americans to the harm this does is astonishing.
The court basically confirmed that you can break all the laws coming into our country but your kids born here are American citizens….
Unbelievable.
The future ramifications of this make me so sad…..for my grandchildren…..
Makes me sick. The rest can’t be mentioned in polite company. (takes deep breath)
Immediately issue an executive order requiring that all women between the ages of 10 and 50 can enter the US ONLY for 45 days at a time and issue the visa ONLY once a medical certification has been reviewed showing that the women named in the visa is NOT pregnant.
This is a sex issue. Only women are child bearing and only in certain age brackets. Trump and Rubio should be able to change entry requirements ASAP.
Does it even have to be an Executive Order? Could it just be a restructuring of VISA requirements from the State Department in light of the clarification of the 14th Amendment from SCOTUS?
New requirements starting IMMEDIATELY for ALL Visa applications to the United States (visitors, students, H1B, guest workers, family, medical…you name it – ALL of them) will now include a pregnancy test for EVERY female between the ages of 12-60, which must be performed at the time of application, IN PERSON, and must be repeated at the Port of Entry. ALL Visas for this same group must also be renewed, IN PERSON, every three months, and if the test is positive, the person will have ONE WEEK to leave the country and if she does not do so, she will be charged with a felony and be sent to prison in a yet to be unnamed country to serve her sentence! We have reciprocity agreements with many nations and SCOTUS has already ruled that we can deport criminals to other countries than those from which they came….
They can get pregnant here after arrival.
Better to limit them to 1 month.
Keep them out by force then.
Sundance, your latest tweets on the workaround re: visas is brilliant! Kudos to you! In the words of Murphy Jones, James Gardner, in the movie, Murphy’s Romance, when you can’t fight city hall, “wrestle them!”
Well, their IS a way for POTUS to deal with this and further treason by the high court. A LEGAL and Constitutional way. And a way that I would have already done were I in the Oval. Here’s how it should and must be done. First, POTUS invites every justice to the WH for a meeting. All except for Thomas, Gorsuch and Alito. As they arrive, they are ushered into a conference room and seated at a long table and instructed not to talk. Their phones and any other devices are taken away at the door of course. There, they wait. And wait. And wait some more. Then, Dept of War strolls in, followed one by one by other important cabinet members. And finally,the AG arrives carrying leather portfolios and pens for each justice. He places them before each pupil. The justices are now pupils because they are about to be schooled in hard ball. The Joint Chiefs stroll in, and stand across the room. Then the VP arrives and is seated. Waiting…finally POTUS arrives surrounded by heavily armed SS and his private security. He sits at center table eying each justice as he would a road killed skunk. He instructs them to open their portfolios. Inside are two documents, one is a resignation for the Supreme Court. The other is an NDA. Trump tells them in a flat emotionless voice that they can do one of two things, resign right here, right now, or be arrested for treason and taken away to an undisclosed location immediately. If they choose to resign, they cannot talk about any of this, ever, or appear on any media, or write or appear in any book movie or any other media. Ever. They lose their government pensions, but keep their freedom to live out their miserable lives quietly. If any choose not to resign, they get cuffed and rushed away to waiting cars that take them to Andrews and away to some rat infested CIA black book prison overseas to rot alone in solitary. While this is going on, their offices and homes are being swept clean of all devices, papers, anything at all pertaining to their professional lives. Trump appoints Thomas as acting Chief Justice and the other two serve as temporary SCOTUS. The President invokes the PEADS and the Insurrection Act and declares a National Emergency. Any congressmen or anyone else want to complain, they can join the others in solitary, for life. THIS, is the level of action that is required to save our America.
U.S. Senator Eric Schmitt (R-MO)
U.S. Senator Eric Schmitt (R-MO)
SCOTUS leaves us no other option but to eliminate the problem at its source – illegal aliens entering our country illegally
Stop birth tourism immediately
Deport all illegal aliens .
Prosecute employers of illegals to the maximum extent of the law.
Stop all welfare to illegals
End sanctuary cities
End foreign aid and trade with the countries who send their people here
Confiscate remittances by illegals
The aim should be to end the Democrats dirty scheme of importing future voters, which was their plan all along.
I used to think those folks over at the Federalist Society were bright boys, they Amy Comey Barret came along.
Yes, but on the bright side, this means that Bruce Lee can still be acknowledged as an American.
To describe this as an unmitigated disaster is a considerable understatement.
IMHO the SCOTUS majority has literally sentenced the country to death, and possible (probable?) Civil War.
Today in FL I woke up, saw the weather report on my Fox35 app saying 100% chance for thunderstorms from 2:15 to 6:00. One hundred percent.
I waited all day for a storm that never came. Not a drop of rain.
This is how I feel about politics lately.
“Q” can go have carnal relations with horses.
The majority threw out original intent and made a political ruling, not a legal one.
Don’t forget, it was Heritage scholars John Malcolm and Zack Smith recommended her (ACB) to Trump for the Supreme Court –
https://www.heritage.org/courts/impact/heritage-pulls-out-all-stops-amy-coney-barretts-confirmation
https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/impact/heritage-expert-helps-shape-supreme-court-nominee-list
Seems most of the justices failed basic reading comprehension.
The 14th Amendment is not that hard to understand. Only someone deliberately trying to be obtuse would say it grants birthright citizenship.
“A Republic…if you can keep it.”
Sorry to let you down, Ben.
Reinstitute The DRAFT.
Make Military Service MANDATORY, for all those 1st Generation Anchor Babies and children of foreign nationals who had their children here via birther tourism yet live abroad. Keep them in separate military units so they can’t infiltrate our volunteer military , and put them on KP and LaTrine Duty for four years.
Offer them an out for renouncing their citizenship.
I want to share the perspective of Joe Lange who has written essays and analysis of what is going on in the country. He had an article today, “Did Trump Really Lose at the Supreme Court?” “Or is he winning the long game?”
I will quote parts of the article:
I would encourage everyone to relax on the two big “losses” at the Supreme Court.
Step back.
There’s something bigger happening.
Though I missed most of the news happening yesterday.
Trump’s reaction to his loss on “mail in ballots” was eye opening to me, because Trump didn’t seem too phased by the ruling.
He used some wording in his response, which downplayed the ruling and I think that was the KEY.
youtu.be/xGSNlA7-vBA?si…
Did you catch the part everyone missed?
“basically, they’re keeping it a little way that it is now”
Reminder.
Trump isn’t trying to get rid of ALL mail in ballots.
Just the fraudulent ones.
The largest group of “mail in ballots” come from the military.
Anybody remember the Bush vs Gore election?
“Gov. George W. Bush sued election officials in 13 Florida counties today for rejecting the absentee ballots of members of the military serving abroad, capitalizing on an issue that has been a public relations boon to the Republicans and that could determine the fate of hundreds of votes for the presidency.”
nytimes.com/2000/11/23/us/…
Now if anybody’s vote should be protected, it should definitely be the people who are risking their lives to protect our freedoms.
Trump is going to protect the “mail in ballots” of our military personnel.
But why did Trump say, the Supreme Court ruling was basically keeping it “a little” the way it is now?
The Supreme Court didn’t prevent ballots received AFTER election day from being counted, but did require the ballots to be “postmarked” by election day.
Why is that a big deal?
GAME THEORY.
Trump AND the Supreme Court are in the process of removing the avenues for cheating through mail in ballots in the FUTURE, while at the same time, preventing the future lawsuits that try and prevent military ballots that were mailed by election day.
Don’t forget:
The U.S. Postal Service is refusing all “mail in ballots” that are not verified by the federal registry proving citizenship.
And the Postal Service owns a patent on blockchain technology associated with “mail in ballots.”
None of this is a coincidence.
What looked like a loss, actually helped cement in the Constitution, that ALL mail in ballots must be “postmarked” by election day.
Blockchain technology will be used to “prove” that postmark in the FUTURE.
Never forget that Trump is playing the “long game” and trying to establish as many legal “safeguards” as possible.
Same with the birthright citizenship “loss.”
It looks really bad, but most people are missing the same “playbook” by Kavanaugh, when Trump took his first loss at the Supreme Court over tariffs.
Trump purposely used a specific law on tariffs that was rejected by the Supreme Court.
He knew it would be rejected.
Trump was purposely “limiting” the broad use of that specific law by past presidents, so that presidents in the FUTURE, can’t use it to get rid of his tariffs.
What did Trump do?
The same day, he took Kavanaugh’s “advice” and reinstated the tariffs using the law that is now deemed Constitutional.
Kavanaugh just did the same thing with “birthright citizenship.”
He outlined the legal pathway that the Supreme Court will approve, for “ending” birthright citizenship.
From Senator Eric Schmitt:
——————
“The majority tried to constitutionalize unlimited birthright citizenship. But Justice Kavanaugh MAY have left Congress a door.”
“I’m filing legislation to walk through it.”
“And I’ll keep working on a constitutional amendment to restore American citizenship.”
Senator Schmitt:
Senator Eric Schmitt
@SenEricSchmitt
The majority tried to constitutionalize unlimited birthright citizenship. But Justice Kavanaugh MAY have left Congress a door. I’m filing legislation to walk through it. And I’ll keep working on a constitutional amendment to restore American citizenship. https://t.co/WV8gu1OYhy
Rand Paul has also declared that he is for the amendment.
Have you noticed Rand has flipped and now supporting Trump?
Trump is playing the long game and this “loss,” will be turned into a “win” but more importantly, immigration law will be permanently changed to prevent birthright citizenship in the FUTURE.
What’s happened at the Supreme Court over the last two days, is not the end of the story.
The “end results” are what really matters and that’s the game that Trump is playing.
End article. What do you think about his article?
There are some who argue that Marco Rubio is not a natural born citizen because his parents were not yet naturalized at the time he was born here. That argument is now gone, settled, obsolete.
With this decision Marco Rubio, having been born in the US, is without question a natural born citizen and qualified to be President.
KAVANAUGH and BARRETT.
BIGGEST mistake since Eve took the apple.
Thank God I won’t be alive long enough to see the white race become a targeted and persecuted minority in the shithole America will become.
F-ck Kavanaugh.
F-ck Barrett.
F-ck Roberts.
Buy weapons, ammo, medical gear, and have a plan for you and your family to meet the coming downfall of your country.
G-d bless Gorsuch, Sam, and Clarence.
Illegal + illegal = legal ? There’s that progressive math again. SO disappointing but sadly not unexpected.