Like many of you I am profoundly angered by the Supreme Court decision that fractures our nation and conveys citizenship to the children of illegal aliens born in the United States. [PDF HERE] In fact, I was so angered to my core, I went for a long walk before doing any further commenting on the matter.
U.S. Citizenship is now determined by how good at violating our nation’s borders, by conniving, by scheming and by deception to create a qualified child where no adult qualification exists. This is the most detrimental decision by the Supreme Court in generations and will profoundly impact our nation.
There is no longer an apple, it’s all worms.
Today, the Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship – the guarantee of citizenship status to everyone born in the United States.
In a decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, five supreme court justices agreed with the challengers saying Trump’s order cannot be reconciled with the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which confers citizenship on anyone “born … in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”
(6-3) Writing for the majority, Roberts emphasized that the “children born of parents unlawfully or temporarily present in the United States” “satisfy both elements of the Citizenship Clause.” “Under the Constitution,” he concluded, “they are citizens at birth.”
Roberts was joined in the majority by Justice SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, BARRETT, JACKSON and KAVANAUGH.
Justice THOMAS filed a dissenting opinion with GORSUCH and ALITO.
SCOTUS BLOG – In his dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito called the ruling, “one of the most important decisions in the history of the Court” and “a serious mistake.” “Careful analysis of the text of the Fourteenth Amendment and the process that led to its adoption,” Alito argued, “shows that it does not degrade the concept of United States citizenship in this way. Instead,” he contended, “the Fourteenth Amendment confers citizenship on only those children who, at birth, owe allegiance solely to this country.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed with the result that the court reached – that the president’s executive order is invalid – but not its reasoning. In his view, Trump’s order “does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment” but does violate a federal law providing that children who are “born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” are U.S. citizens. Congress, Kavanaugh suggested, “could amend” that law “or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But,” he noted, “Congress has not yet done so.”
Justice Clarence Thomas penned a lengthy dissent, which Justice Neil Gorsuch joined. He called the majority’s account “not historically accurate” and said that it “adds to the sad history of the Fourteenth Amendment, which was designed and understood to secure equal rights for the freed blacks but has instead been repurposed for political projects that the Reconstruction Congress did not support.”
Gorsuch also wrote a separate brief dissent, in which he appeared to suggest that Trump’s executive order might violate the Constitution as it applies to the children of undocumented immigrants who intend to live in the United States permanently. “If those parents are not domiciled here,” Gorsuch queried, “then where are they domiciled? And if the answer is nowhere,” he continued, “how can we reconcile that conclusion with this Court’s longstanding recognition that every person is domiciled somewhere?” Because the challengers in this case have argued that Trump’s order is invalid in all circumstances, rather than just some, Gorsuch explained, “these questions may not be properly before us. But their answers are undeniably important to a Nation committed to a view of citizenship open to all children born here to parents who can call this country their home.” (SOURCE)
Consequences and possibilities to come in the next few articles on the matter.
There are some who argue that Marco Rubio is not a natural born citizen because his parents were not yet naturalized at the time he was born here. That argument is now gone, settled, obsolete.
With this decision Marco Rubio, having been born in the US, is without question a natural born citizen and qualified to be President.
Silver lining.
(Plus there’s not a thing the dems can do about it unless they want to help Republicans do something in Congress to undo this ruling. Which they won’t.)
Silver Lining??? marco who joined with Grahmnesty McShame and Scummer in the Gang of 8 senatos for AMNESTY for Obamys Illegals???
We are so screwed, 6 Ways from Sunday.
Welcome to the USSA!!!
And Trump and Reagan were originally democrats.
People change.
Except Rubio changed for the worse. He was first elected into the Senate by the Florida Tea Party only to betray them by kissing up to John McCain, the man who worked with the IRS, to destroy the Tea Party nationwide with arguably illegal, expensive, and relentless IRS audits.
We are all being screwed and the plan spans a century or more.
Wong Kim Ark decision was used to argue what you claim. However WKA should be overturned. It was not overturned so that usupers would qualify for POTUS. It worked – no? Our last usurper fundementally changed America.
Sure – why not let Rubio be a usurper too?
Natural born citizenship is only cited as to presidential eligibility and requires both parents to be citizens. But this court would not rule that way for sure. So freaking sad that originalism doesn’t seem to apply.
Double edged sword. Because then the kenyan commie gets a pass as well. I’d gladly give up little Marco & Ted Cruz to jail obama.
A RINO Senator like Rubio who also publicly called Trump a liar when he stated that the FBI was spying on his 2016 Trump campaign, does not deserve the presidency. Instead of helping Trump fight back against the FBI’s Russigate operation against his presidency, Rubio’s public statement against Trump only helped the FBI to prolong their illegal actions against Trump’s first term.
KAVANAUGH and BARRETT.
BIGGEST mistake since Eve took the apple.
Thank God I won’t be alive long enough to see the white race become a targeted and persecuted minority in the shithole America will become.
F-ck Kavanaugh.
F-ck Barrett.
F-ck Roberts.
Buy weapons, ammo, medical gear, and have a plan for you and your family to meet the coming downfall of your country.
It will happen fast. You might live to see it.
Robert’s was Bush’s pick and everyone, conservatives that is, wanted Thomas as Chief Justice.
Would love to know who pushed Kavanaugh and Barrett.
I blame Pence for Barrett, it’s an Indiana thing.
Leonard “Scumbag” Leo.
Kavanaugh and Barrett were McConnell picks.
It’s always those 3 justices, isn’t it? …. Barrett, in partcular, was a huge mistake on Trump’s part, IMO
Anti-Federalists lost the Constitutional debate to the Federalists. We had under the Articles of Confederation a Confederacy,
It’s coming Again, because We have Irreconcilable Differences, unless you want a Commie Mommie Feral Bankrupt BureauCrazy ruling You.
Amen to that General!
General, much like that other great General, R. E. Lee, you are my “Bad ol’ Man!”
G-d bless Gorsuch, Sam, and Clarence.
Illegal + illegal = legal ? There’s that progressive math again. SO disappointing but sadly not unexpected.
Kinda like a double-negative.
Nothing has changed since yesterday other than the Court unfortunately upholding a bad interpretation of the 14 Amendment that has been used for far too long.
So what do we do now to address the problem created by the Robert’s court?
Sundance has a really good idea on this:
https://x.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/2072036180829601995#m
That is what should be done
I hope they see it and discuss doing it
Roberts – failure emeritus
Actually, one thing did change. Now we know that anyone who comes to the USA for any reason is “subject to the jurisdiction.”. So what what jurisdiction should we start applying? Can we begin charging income taxes on tourists? What else?
Let’s see now… FICA, Social Security/Medicare, Income Tax, property taxes on foreign property, capital gains, etc.
And a sky-high illegal Squatter’s Tax.
Oppps,… Can’t pay,…. you then get a free USA deportation travel doc back to the country of origin.,… preferably by a commercial cargo ship.
So the anchor babies are “subject to the jurisdiction.” of the laws of the USA regardless of where they reside at in the world.
Child Protective Services can go into turd world countries and take into protective custody anchor babies that are in conditions that would be considered abusive here in the USA but culturally normal in the turd world country. For example, think of female muslim children, Chinese child labor, English dentist office visits, Swedish euthanasia of minors.
Child Protective Services will need a much bigger budget and their own Special Forces Unit in order to put the anchor babies under “subject to the jurisdiction.”.
Make them sign up for Selective Service.
Termination of parental rights. By coming to the United States illegally or legally for the sole reason of giving birth the mother is admitting that her home country is not suitable to raise an American child. Send the mother back and put the kid up for adoption. 🤔
This was my first thought after hearing this news. Just have the State Department and Border Enforcement disallow any pregnant women entry on a tourist or other visitor visa.
President Trump needs to do this asap.
And it gets better!
https://xcancel.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/2072054616049721730#m
Yes it does! 😂
TheLastRefuge
@TheLastRefuge2
Dear @SecRubio and @realDonaldTrump , as a pragmatic American I respectfully suggest and recommend the @StateDept immediately institute the “Roberts Requirement” following similar visa entry protocols previously used for COVID-19 tests prior to U.S. admittance.
The Roberts Requirement: Each female visa applicant must present a valid negative pregnancy test taken no longer than 10 days prior to travel to the United States.
The certified document, negative pregnancy test, together with all related visa approvals must be presented to Customs and Border Patrol at each port of entry. Failure disqualifies the traveler.
Same protocol as COVID-19, only using pregnancy status as the disqualifying health issue. It is a lawful regulation that does not need congressional approval.
Thank You,
An American!
> Each female visa applicant must present a valid negative pregnancy test taken no longer than 10 days prior to travel to the United States.
Big Pharma has a woodie the size of Everest.
Yeah, great idea–replace borders with medical testing. Good gravy.
And do you think that wealthy, connected, and criminal people won’t be able to get and show a “negative” pregnancy test result for the mamacita they want to have drop her spawn on US soil?
Come on. TSA’s busy worrying about the size of toothpaste tubes while the real terrorism unfolds elsewhere.
Maybe we should offer to house native Europeans who are pregnant?
Pregnant white south african farmers. Pregnant anti-communist fleeing Cuba. Pregnant anti-communists north Koreans fleeing to the south, then US.
Are any of you surprised by this SCOTUS decision???? Of course you’re not, any neither am I….
All this decision did was solidify the SCOTUS as an impotent and non serious….ACB, Kavanaugh, Roberts are complete and utter frauds…..
The idea that Birthright citizenship for Illegals is somehow legit is laughable and defies commonsense…..
Heck of a 250th birthday present SCOTUS! With friends like these who needs enemies….
F’ing outrageous decision.
I’d argue that SCOTUS lost its credibility, and standing, long ago when it irresponsibly threw out the 2020 TX (with 17 other states joining!) attempt/suit to hold the cheating battleground states to the standard of their OWN election laws (which were violated left and right during the 2020 election steal process).
The republic literally cannot survive when a dash to our soil by illegals to give birth constitutes BC. What an outrageous interpretation that constitutes just another stage of Constitutional crisis (we’ve already seen other instances; for example an outgoing Fed Gov Executive, with Congressional and Judicial in league, attempting to undermine/steal/disrupt the incoming POTUS Admin term; the 2016 Russia collusion ongoing through 2020 election
steal coup).
POTUS47 Admin must/should immediately invoke national emergency and declare Biden era immigration policy as unconstitutional, as well as criminal and treasonous (they should have done this already, but now the BC SCOTUS decision provides immediate political capital to do so).
Mayorkas himself should be rolled up, cuffed, perp-walked, and subjected to military tribunal for the tens of millions of weaponized illegals imported during Biden regime.
Here is Justice Kavanaugh’s remark concerning a potential statutory remedy:
“But the Order does contravene a federal statute, 8 U. S. C. §1401(a). Congress could—consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment—amend §1401(a) or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But Congress has not yet done so.”
§1401(a) essentially restates the relevant language of the 14thA ( minus the state reference.)
So Kavanaugh is disputing that a Constitutional Amendment modifying the 14th would be required.
My thought for a statutory amendment:
“For purposes of this subsection (a), “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” shall mean that each parent shall be a lawful resident of the U.S. at the time of birth, having thereby relinquished any prior allegience to, and jurisdiction of, a foreign power.”
The five justices in the majority did not think a statutory amendment could fix things, so even if Congress tried to do something, it would get struck down by the courts.
Is that true; Roberts’ opinion addressed the prospect of a statutory remedy and rejected it?
An excerpt would be helpful.
We are being ruled by DEI hires on the SC.
Please, Roberts, you’re funny. Congress won’t even pass the SAVE Act, they’re as big a bunch of cowards as you
No doubt Pres. Trump would be eager to consider your advice.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/06/30/trump-birthright-citizenship-congress/90753833007/
How can children of parents “NOT subject to the jurisdiction thereof” suddenly become “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”???? This is crazy!
The same way Wong Kim Ark did: by having lawfully resident parents at the child’s birth.
Still convoluted reasoning as residency is not what grants citizenship and there was no naturalization process for Chinese nationals prior to that case.
Nothing circular about it. Parental citizenship was not required, but lawful residence of the parents existed.
My proposal is conistent with the Wongs’ status.
They were “lawfully resident” but were they NATURALIZED CITIZENS?
No. And neither does my proposal require parental citizenship, only lawful residence.
I’m more interested in the intent of those who wrote the amendment than your particular proposal. The question of the purpose and intent of the amendment is all that really should matter.
“….exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens … unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But Congress has not yet done so.”
…not yet done so…
because Congress has been (miss fixated upon) trying to slip in ‘amnesty of illegal border crossers’ language into various other legislations for years – without fulfilling a prior legislative ruling to secure the border(s) … 24/7/365 incl holidays …?
Article 3, Section 2 of the Constitution specifically identifies the cases over which the Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction, not one of which involves immigration or naturalization. In addition, after recounting all of the specific cases under SCOTUS jurisdiction comes this caveat: “In all other cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.” In other words, Congress can enact a statute that relieves the Court of jurisdiction over under what conditions foreign nationals can become citizens of the United States. The statute should specifically state that the Congress is overturning today’s decision on the following bases:
These sworn judicial officers are committing the felony of perjury against the Constitution. Prosecution is the LEGAL remedy — not remedial legislation (Congress).
This is a Constitutional difference of opinion, something like Eastman’s “novel legal theory” about the Electoral Vote Count. If Eastman’s theory led to Biden not being certified as elected, he could challenge through the Supreme Court to get a ruling on Eastman’s theory. If SCOTUS disagreed, all that would happen would be a repeat of the Electoral Vote Count and Biden would be certified. No one would be prosecuted. That is how these disputes are supposed to go, but the Smith January 6 indictment might someday have an effect on that.
The main thing is, if they do it by Article 3, Section 2, it is over and done with in a hurry and no more cases about Birth “Right” Citizenship. As if a Baby knows what US citizenship is. The Nigerian soccer player who came to play on the US team based on this application of the 14th Amendment had no idea he could do that. I think he was an English citizen at the time, or still Nigerian, or both.
Well, someone said that we have 4 votes sewed up for the next time. If we get to replace one of the worms the vote goes to 6-3 in our favor. We will have to wait it out.
In the mean time we can:
deny visa’s for pregnant women,
deport the 50M illegals in the country already,
and dole out consequences for those that illegally financially support illegals.
There is no reason all the Haitians and Somalians can’t be gone in 60 days.
There is no reason all the Haitians and Somalians can’t be gone in 60 days.
Either you forgot the /sarc tag or you should take that to a comedy club.
A Trump Admin official told John Roberts on Fox today that estimate of ’60 days.”
Yes and I believe in the vote fairy who makes all elections honest…
They will die here of old age!
Yes.
And their children ad infinitum.
> deny visa’s for pregnant women,
Yeah, it’s real real hard for connected people to gin up a “negative” test result on a pregnancy test.
Just like they skate on drug tests and everything else.
Blackstone may provide perspective on trespass or invasion.
Trespass, in its largest and most extreme sense, signifies any transgression or offense against the law of nature, society, or of the country in which we live; whether it relates to a man’s person, or his property.
This decision encourages trespass with intent to plunder [Webster’s 1828] or invasion [Article IV §4].
Considering the many extreme assaults on our Lives, Liberty, Property, pursuit of Happiness, and consent I lean to the invasion explanation.
Horrible decision !!!!! Against the Constitution.
Seal the borders, shut them down. No immigration whatsoever. Anyone caught trying to sneak across will be shot on sight.
Airplanes and tunnels. Many small landing strips in border states.
Kavanagh argued that the president doesn’t have the power to unilaterally decide what that law is. He’s right, congress can and should codify it. An EO from Trump would be reversed as soon as a Dem president took power.
I agree with the sentiment of the EO and don’t think the 14th amendment had tourism birthers and millions of illegal aliens in mind when written, but the execution was sloppy.
Flame away folks.
It sure looks like the right case needs to be brought forward. One that overturns Wong Kim Ark! WKA decision is a rotten one.
WKA was a Chinese citizen the very moment he was born here. As with nearly all sovereign nations, Chinese law ensured the child of two Chinese citizens was also a Chinese citizen, even when born outside its borders. It is the same for US citizens. Clearly anyone who is subject to allegiance to a foreign nation must first relinquish that allegiance before becoming a US citizen (or apply for dual citizenship).
The WKA SOCTUS decision willfully ignored this and should have long ago been overturned. So how did WKA decision make it through? There is a likely reason: NBC and foreign usurpation. President Chester Arthur nominated the author, Justice Gray, to SCOTUS to make sure he would write the WKA opinion in a manner to undermine immigration integrity. President Arthur was the first NBC ineligible POTUS usurper. Hussein was the second.
Gray’s opinion referenced a preliminary version of “The Allegiance of the United States under the Present Naturalization Laws” by Horace Binney (Harvard). Binney’s final version of the paper did not contain the faulty arguments and references that Gray chose to use in his decision.
A possible solution: bar entry of any woman of child bearing age.
Won’t undo this but will prevent future illegal people from taking us for suckers.
In the 14th Amendment there is no citation of the following words or terms”
Baby; Pregnant; Child Birth; Mother; Delivery; Infant; Newborn; Transient Alien; Illegal Alien or Immigrant; nationality of parents; residency of parents in a state, etc. etc.
That amendment was not about aliens of any stripe and not about babies simply because the the verb “born” is in the text.
From an historical perspective, the nomination of ACB may be the most destructive mistake of the President’s two administrations. For whatever reasons, it happened, and her disasterous tenure is only in its youth.
When the mail-in voting and birthright citizenship SCOTUS decisions are combined with Thune’s scuttling of the SAVE Act, the perfect storm is created to destroy our Republic.
I remember being piled on aplenty back when everyone was jumping up and down about the Nice Christian Mommy. “OH SHE CLERKED FOR SCALIA!!!!!”
Proves nothing. And she’s young enough that the republic will be plagued with her for another 40 years.
It is obvious that Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts don’t seem to able to read. They seem to be motivated by something else.
Yes, many of us have our suspicions of what motivates those two.
ACB votes with Roberts.
Birthright Citizenship means a Foreign Nation only needs an
Army of pregnant Illegal Alien women to take over the USA.
Communist China is already implementing this plan
China has approximately 1.413 billion people.
The SCROTUS is not our friend. A most damaging decision. I am awaiting Jeff Childers’ (Coffee & Covid) piece tomorrow. I can’t wait to see how puts lipstick on this pig of a decision.
DeSantis – I haven’t had an opportunity to read that opinion…when they did the 14th amendment, what they were trying to do was overturn the Dread Scott decision. Dread Scott said, the Supreme Court and Dread Scott said Dread Scott wasn’t a citizen because he was black. He couldn’t sue. Lincoln rejected that. And so what they wanted to say is, “Wait a minute, no, you’re a citizen, you know, regardless of race, and we’re gonna correct that injustice.” That was the purpose of it. It was not to have people show up from China for two weeks, have babies, get them citizenship, and then go back to China. I mean, how ridiculous has this become?
Most of us knew how the Supreme Court was going to rule on Birthright Citizenship. It’s just so hard to officially learn of their decision. At least President Trump had the courage to bring Birthright Citizenship directly before the US Supreme Court. Has any other President done this?
This is correct. I also think the president doesn’t have the power to unilaterally determine this via an EO, which can also just be reversed by another president down the road.
Perhaps, but Sec of State Rubio can set restrictions on who and how foreigners can enter the USA, legally. Checkmate!
Flame back?
That would be a better tact in handling this. People get so hung up on EO. They’re all temporary by nature.
Exactly, he forced them to show their cards. We have allowed this for 100 years, most were not aware now we are at critical mass.
I guess that now means…”don’t let ’em in”
Deport, Deport, Deport!!
And then deport some more.
That means we get to call the new entry processes into the United States the Roberts protocols.
Stick it him and don’t let anyone forget it.
Yeah. Right. Because pregnancy tests can’t be faked, right?
Alexander Hamilton, from Federalist 78 (1788):
“Whoever attentively considers the different departments of power must perceive, that, in a government in which they are separated from each other, the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them.
The Executive not only dispenses the honors, but holds the sword of the community.
The legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated.
The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever.
It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.”
Hamilton could not have foreseen a time when the legislature becomes so paralyzed by partisan animosity that it tacitly cedes to the courts the right to make decisions that are inherently political.
J
Trump can still ignore the ruling. Other Presidents have done the same, and there is nothing the Judiciary can do about it.
I am taking these very “angry/frustrating FEELINGS” into my SOUL, and becoming extremely SILENT, … and GOD Breathing into these very uncomforable FEELINGS. Instead of “running away into tv, movies, food, alcohol, drugs (legal or illegal), sex, work, etc ….”, or “lashing out at people/places/things”. BE SILENT! and Just BREATH GOD INTO YOU, and then BREAHING GOD OUT OF YOU!. BE SILENT and “feel these horrible feelings”, and GOD BREATH. Practice this, every day, … this Charged Emotion can be transformed … and build up “GOD POWER” in you, but you have to GOD BREATH into these “charged emotions”. You were educated to either “express these “dark feelings”, or stuff it down. But this NEW WAY will change you over time, GOD POWER coming from “deep inside of you”, will produce “wisdom action”. It is GOD POWER, and you allow GOD to flow through you instead of human power. You can use these “dark emotions” to defeat you or enlighten you to the POWER OF GOD. And you have been given this choice your whole life. You can chose again, and again, and make a better choice. You will get tired of “running away” or acting from out externally on the “people” around you (fuming). What I’m talking about is GROWING UP! I’m using this “event” to “awaken me to SILENCE and GOD BREATHING.
I’m very confused in speaking this stuff aloud to you guys. … I’m getting mixed messages inside me, … do I say this stuff, or just keep SILENT and do it myself (inside). I am asking GOD to guide me. Because for 20-40 years it seemed I was suppose to be SILENT. Internal crisis for me. Do I post this, or delete it.
John Roberts gave us Obamacare and made us return 160 billion Dollars in tariff taxes. Now this. Wow.
barrett and roberts established themselves as judicial whores long ago via their liberal voting records. Instead of evaluating the 14th amendment on bc and striking down The President’s EO as was assumed, these traitors rewrote the law. In doing so they created a global invitation for all illegal foreign freeloaders to come on in for free, free, free. They bastardized our once sacred sovereignty and the longstanding value of legal citizenship.
I believe citizen vigilante is about to get very real, very soon…. today’s decision is the tipping point. And congress is too infected with moral rot, perversion, corruption and leftover neutered dogs to create legislation to end bc…
God save our republic and may patriots arise…
Don’t insult, “Ladies of the evening.”
I have bit my tongue all day, now I will unload and some of you will not like it.
President Trump, why the hell did you sign that executive order in the first place? If you had a 4d chess move like having the proof that the 2020 election was a coupe and that all of FJB’s time as president was then null and void, including his supreme court justice, that would have been one thing, but with the people you had at the FBI and Justice at the time of signing the EO, you know that you had nothing to move forward with. Same for proving that obama was an illegitimate president.
You had a stupid idea thinking you could appease MAGA with it while you fumbled around the globe and ignored our domestic situation.
Stupid lame ass timing on your part Trump and now you punt the ball to congress, the same congress that opposes you at every turn. Because of this stupidity, you have loss a big chunk of my respect. Some field general you are. Now you will have to work ten times as hard to regain the trust that you have lost. Stupid.
Gee, and what’s your opinion of our Majority Supremes in their Birthright citizenship ruling today,… you know, the ones whose Wrongful interpretation of British Law and Erroneous ruling has caused this outrage?
They are leftist and protectors of the establishment order and and makes their rulings as such. There is no surprise there and there shouldn’t have been for Trump either.
You have lost the plot. The executive order forced the hand. Congress should have fixed this 75 years ago, but they didn’t. The time for this fight was long ago, Trump is the only one with the courage to fight it.
Trump did not fight this. Setting up a target to be shot at is not the same a fighting a battle. If he had first had Jackson (FJB’s Court Justice) removed because FJB was president as a byproduct of a coup, then that would have been fighting, readying the battlefield. He did nothing to prepare for this “fight”. All he did was sign an EO.
An illegal giving birth on American soil is now a tax.
How about an immediate $500,000 fine payable immediately and incrementing the tariff rates for every offense to the nation of origin?
Hit them where it hurts, in the wallet.
Establishes a Muslim communist foothold
Anyone think the legality of the 2020 sElection will be honestly, definitively established? Anytime soon? What about Jackson?
It is a sad day for the country. This decision will set the stage for the further Balkanization of the country, including Muslim enclaves using Sharia law. I pray for President Trump to continue the fight to MAGA, but if this SCOTUS decision stands, it will spell the end of our country as we know it.
Who’s going to save us now…
We got three horrible decisions by the Supreme Court this week proving that the Supreme Court is not going to come to our rescue on anything especially election fraud.
The Senate is refusing to pass the SAVE AMERICA ACT and they’re not going to save us.
A victory in Iran isn’t in the cards so that’s not going to save us.
The only thing that will save us is an overwhelming victory in November and that requires…
A: $60 Oil
B: $2 Gas
C: 2% Inflation
D: 3% Mortgages
E: 2% Car loans
President Trump should be getting back to the basics that won the 2016 and 2024 Presidential Elections! These side trips off the reservation are killing us! 😎
So everything needs to be at historic lows to win an election? Oh boy…
Yes! Otherwise we cannot over the “cheat”.
I was talking to a friend about this. I said to her if a foreigner has a baby in the US and that automatically makes the baby a legal US citizen because the baby is under the jurisdiction of the US does this mean the parents have lost jurisdiction over their child? The parent who is a foreigner can be by law be deported but the child cannot by law be deported because the child was born under the jurisdiction in the country named the United States of America. Who does this child belong to the US and US government or the parent? My friend looked at me shook her head.
That’s fine. But their parent are not citizens. Deport their collective asses. If they want to keep their children, the child can go with them. Otherwise, put them up for adoption. Simple.
It is truly a pity to learn that Roberts, Barrett and Kavanaugh are incapable of understanding plain English. A requirement to obey laws of this country while you are here, is not the same as the jurisdiction the USA has over its citizens.
The 9 Soopremes can Determine Law in the USSA. This was Never the Intent of the position of the sole Chief Justice in the Constitution.
The Constitution is Not a Suicide Pact, but 6 Soopremes made it one today. Millions of Dual Citizen Chinese residing in China from Birth Mills in the US Pacific protectorates are Guaranteed citizenship. The Baby Mills will Replace the Border Invaders. This is TREASON. THE 14TH Amendment was clearly to establish citizenship for former slaves after the CW.
Kurt Schlichter has a more positive view of the decision, arguing that the 5-4 vote moves the ball “down the field” toward eventual reversal. Worth reading:
https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2026/06/30/cheer-up-the-birthright-citizenship-case-moves-us-toward-inevitable-victory-n2678580
But wasn;t it like this Before POTUS signed the EO changing it.. Before his EO they had
birthright citizenship…so now they still have birthright citizenship?
It was ambiguous before and could be argued that it only applied to the children of former slaves, now it’s codified and applies to anyone. The supremes have stolen or diluted an important piece from the American Heritage Blacks.
So We were getting Raped, then there was an EO making Rape illegal, and now the 6 Soopremes make Rape Legal Again. HAPPY DAZE ARE HERE AGAIN, THE USA IS BEING RAPED, WTFU !!!!!!!
So Mr. Gorsuck, if I sneak into my neighbor’s house, and call it “my home”, it is?
Congress, Kavanaugh suggested, “could amend” that law “or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But,” he noted, “Congress has not yet done so.”
….and they haven’t passed the SAVE AMERICA ACT either Mr. Kavanaugh…..Wonder which one will pass first.
While it seems hopeless to imagine that Congress can or would do anything to correct an extreme misunderstanding of a constitutional amendment by the SC, what they CAN do is immediately dispense with the requirement that Americans pay for immigration attorneys for all the invaders, for their other court appearances, for their doctor visits, for their official signing up for benefits, etc. (my Medicare statement comes with the final statement in 21 different languages, imagine how expensive to reprint that page on everything).
We should dispense with Americans having to pay for ESL and special tutors, to pay for interpreters and translators.
We spend a fortune trying to accommodate people who hate us and want what we have, an effort with which the SC is aiding them.
But if they’re American “citizens” they can pay for it all themselves, like the rest of us have to do.
Remember that newborns get paperwork done at the hospital to get their Social Security number too.
Here’s another take on the last two days of the USSC rulings::
https://joelange.substack.com/p/did-trump-really-lose-at-the-supreme
Did Trump Really Lose At The Supreme Court?
Or is he winning the long game?
by Joe Lange
“I would encourage everyone to relax on the two big “losses” at the Supreme Court.
Step back.
There’s something bigger happening.
Trump’s reaction to his loss on “mail in ballots” was eye opening to me, because Trump didn’t seem too phased by the ruling.
He used some wording in his response, which downplayed the ruling and I think that was the KEY.
youtu.be/xGSNlA7-vBA?si…
Did you catch the part everyone missed?
“basically, they’re keeping it a little way that it is now”
Reminder.
Trump isn’t trying to get rid of ALL mail in ballots.
Just the fraudulent ones.
The largest group of “mail in ballots” come from the military.
Anybody remember the Bush vs Gore election?
“Gov. George W. Bush sued election officials in 13 Florida counties today for rejecting the absentee ballots of members of the military serving abroad, capitalizing on an issue that has been a public relations boon to the Republicans and that could determine the fate of hundreds of votes for the presidency.”
nytimes.com/2000/11/23/us/…
Now if anybody’s vote should be protected, it should definitely be the people who are risking their lives to protect our freedoms.
Trump is going to protect the “mail in ballots” of our military personnel.
But why did Trump say, the Supreme Court ruling was basically keeping it “a little” the way it is now?
The Supreme Court didn’t prevent ballots received AFTER election day from being counted, but did require the ballots to be “postmarked” by election day.
Why is that a big deal?
Trump AND the Supreme Court are in the process of removing the avenues for cheating through mail in ballots in the FUTURE, while at the same time, preventing the future lawsuits that try and prevent military ballots that were mailed by election day.
Don’t forget:
The U.S. Postal Service is refusing all “mail in ballots” that are not verified by the federal registry proving citizenship.
And the Postal Service owns a patent on blockchain technology associated with “mail in ballots.”
What looked like a loss, actually helped cement in the Constitution, that ALL mail in ballots must be “postmarked” by election day.
Blockchain technology will be used to “prove” that postmark in the FUTURE.
Never forget that Trump is playing the “long game” and trying to establish as many legal “safeguards” as possible.
Same with the birthright citizenship “loss.”
It looks really bad, but most people are missing the same “playbook” by Kavanaugh, when Trump took his first loss at the Supreme Court over tariffs.
Trump purposely used a specific law on tariffs that was rejected by the Supreme Court.
He knew it would be rejected.
Trump was purposely “limiting” the broad use of that specific law by past presidents, so that presidents in the FUTURE, can’t use it to get rid of his tariffs.
What did Trump do?
The same day, he took Kavanaugh’s “advice” and reinstated the tariffs using the law that is now deemed Constitutional.
Kavanaugh just did the same thing with “birthright citizenship.”
He outlined the legal pathway that the Supreme Court will approve, for “ending” birthright citizenship.
….
Trump is playing the long game and this “loss,” will be turned into a “win” but more importantly, immigration law will be permanently changed to prevent birthright citizenship in the FUTURE.
What’s happened at the Supreme Court over the last two days, is not the end of the story.
The “end results” are what really matters and that’s the game that Trump is playing.”
*********************
Time will tell, but the 2026 midterms fast approaching and are important so get out and help the local candidates you want to get elected, even if you live in a so called democrat/communist controlled state like the Pacific left coast. Florida is controlled by the Bush wing of the Rino Republicans but slowly true MAGA conservatives are making progress.
Joe’s been insisting ThE sToRm Is CoMiNg for a decade now.
I am 1,000% loyal to DJT, but the above strikes me as spin and cope. And fantasy.
> SCOTUS just upheld birthright citizenship.
> That means they’re getting ready to end birthright citizenship.
Come on.
–“The largest group of “mail in ballots” come from the military.”–
I don’t see how that can be true. Even if one believes that there are 1,00,000 members of the armed services serving overseas during an election, that does not even get close to the amount of mail in ballots sent in from many states–especially those states where all the votes are mail in ballots.
Shucks, 80% of the ballots in California in 2024 election were mail in ballots according to the California Secretary of State. And the USPS stated that they processed over 99 million mail in ballots in the 2024 election.
How big does the author think the US military is-100 million?
Actually you are correct, per one of Banon’s guests yesterday. Anger has clouded my lenses, and I don’t remember who the guest was, but the assertion was that, IIRC, something like 80% are cast by civilians living overseas. I found this very surprising.
It’s clear every politician, a few exceptions, are hell bent on destroying America. Their hatred for Trump and us Patriots is what drives them. Wake me up when CW2 starts, can’t wait!
The opinion applies to the children only. Deport the illegal mothers, they can choose to take their children on their way home.
Libtards will lose it.
Roberts is a traitor from way back. Barrett is the new traitor and she shows her cowardly core-bowing to the pressure and threats of the far left extremist. Barrett is a disgrace to all Catholics and all women who hold positions of power in our Government system.
The Tulsi Gabbards of the female gender are rare indeed in government or anywhere in leadership. To think Trump appointed and fought for this women to get on the bench!!!
Actually Barrett is exactly what most Catholics are. Or didn’t you get the memo about how the Bishops built their entire social services views and programs around their darling Saul Alinsky?
–The Influence of Saul Alinsky on the Campaign for Human Development
–Lawrence Engel (Theological Studies 59, 1998) (Catholic scholar at a Catholic college in Wisconsin)
> [Editors’ note:] The author argues that the Campaign for Human Development, founded in 1969, is US Catholicism’s most significant and longest social experiment in the 20th century. A postconciliar response to an America in crisis, the campaign is a unique theological resource in the development of an indigenous North American theology. Central to its uniqueness was the bishops’ embrace of the dean of community organizing, Saul David Alinsky.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/004056399805900403
By the time Engel published this piece, the Bishops had poured $225m into their Alinskyite CHD (over half a billion total in today’s dollars–that’s a lot of collection plate offerings) and who knows how much volunteer labor. Another 27 years on, who knows the numbers.
But they’ve been in the people trafficking industry a long time.
https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/catholic-legal-immigration-network/
I haven’t dug into the numbers since maybe 2020, and then the latest figures I had were from 2016, when the Catholic Bishops received $95.2 million in US government funds, comprising over 66% of their total revenues for immigration projects. (Not being required to file a Form 990, they can cloak their activity.)
The Catholics have been against this Republic from the get-go.
The present RCC is rife with questionable shepherds, as it has been at many junctures during its long history. But your final statement that “The Catholics have been against this Republic from the get-go” is inaccurate.
https://pjmedia.com/athena-thorne/2026/06/30/president-trump-could-end-birth-tourism-and-a-lot-of-birthright-citizenship-with-this-1-simple-trick-n4954532
The provision in immigration law that gives Trump the power to end birthright citizenship:
Under the U.S. Code, the president has broad authority over who may enter our country. Specifically, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(f) (INA Section 212(f)) says:
How about we shut down the borders and just any and all immigration. Period. End of story. Any further illegal entries get shot or worse…placed in a democrat household.