Like many of you I am profoundly angered by the Supreme Court decision that fractures our nation and conveys citizenship to the children of illegal aliens born in the United States. [PDF HERE] In fact, I was so angered to my core, I went for a long walk before doing any further commenting on the matter.
U.S. Citizenship is now determined by how good at violating our nation’s borders, by conniving, by scheming and by deception to create a qualified child where no adult qualification exists. This is the most detrimental decision by the Supreme Court in generations and will profoundly impact our nation.
There is no longer an apple, it’s all worms.
Today, the Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship – the guarantee of citizenship status to everyone born in the United States.
In a decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, five supreme court justices agreed with the challengers saying Trump’s order cannot be reconciled with the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which confers citizenship on anyone “born … in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”
(6-3) Writing for the majority, Roberts emphasized that the “children born of parents unlawfully or temporarily present in the United States” “satisfy both elements of the Citizenship Clause.” “Under the Constitution,” he concluded, “they are citizens at birth.”
Roberts was joined in the majority by Justice SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, BARRETT, JACKSON and KAVANAUGH.
Justice THOMAS filed a dissenting opinion with GORSUCH and ALITO.
SCOTUS BLOG – In his dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito called the ruling, “one of the most important decisions in the history of the Court” and “a serious mistake.” “Careful analysis of the text of the Fourteenth Amendment and the process that led to its adoption,” Alito argued, “shows that it does not degrade the concept of United States citizenship in this way. Instead,” he contended, “the Fourteenth Amendment confers citizenship on only those children who, at birth, owe allegiance solely to this country.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed with the result that the court reached – that the president’s executive order is invalid – but not its reasoning. In his view, Trump’s order “does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment” but does violate a federal law providing that children who are “born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” are U.S. citizens. Congress, Kavanaugh suggested, “could amend” that law “or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But,” he noted, “Congress has not yet done so.”
Justice Clarence Thomas penned a lengthy dissent, which Justice Neil Gorsuch joined. He called the majority’s account “not historically accurate” and said that it “adds to the sad history of the Fourteenth Amendment, which was designed and understood to secure equal rights for the freed blacks but has instead been repurposed for political projects that the Reconstruction Congress did not support.”
Gorsuch also wrote a separate brief dissent, in which he appeared to suggest that Trump’s executive order might violate the Constitution as it applies to the children of undocumented immigrants who intend to live in the United States permanently. “If those parents are not domiciled here,” Gorsuch queried, “then where are they domiciled? And if the answer is nowhere,” he continued, “how can we reconcile that conclusion with this Court’s longstanding recognition that every person is domiciled somewhere?” Because the challengers in this case have argued that Trump’s order is invalid in all circumstances, rather than just some, Gorsuch explained, “these questions may not be properly before us. But their answers are undeniably important to a Nation committed to a view of citizenship open to all children born here to parents who can call this country their home.” (SOURCE)
Consequences and possibilities to come in the next few articles on the matter.



There are some who argue that Marco Rubio is not a natural born citizen because his parents were not yet naturalized at the time he was born here. That argument is now gone, settled, obsolete.
With this decision Marco Rubio, having been born in the US, is without question a natural born citizen and qualified to be President.
Silver lining.
(Plus there’s not a thing the dems can do about it unless they want to help Republicans do something in Congress to undo this ruling. Which they won’t.)
KAVANAUGH and BARRETT.
BIGGEST mistake since Eve took the apple.
Thank God I won’t be alive long enough to see the white race become a targeted and persecuted minority in the shithole America will become.
F-ck Kavanaugh.
F-ck Barrett.
F-ck Roberts.
Buy weapons, ammo, medical gear, and have a plan for you and your family to meet the coming downfall of your country.
G-d bless Gorsuch, Sam, and Clarence.
Illegal + illegal = legal ? There’s that progressive math again. SO disappointing but sadly not unexpected.
Nothing has changed since yesterday other than the Court unfortunately upholding a bad interpretation of the 14 Amendment that has been used for far too long.
So what do we do now to address the problem created by the Robert’s court?
Sundance has a really good idea on this:
https://x.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/2072036180829601995#m
That is what should be done
I hope they see it and discuss doing it
Roberts – failure emeritus
Actually, one thing did change. Now we know that anyone who comes to the USA for any reason is “subject to the jurisdiction.”. So what what jurisdiction should we start applying? Can we begin charging income taxes on tourists? What else?
Let’s see now… FICA, Social Security/Medicare, Income Tax, property taxes on foreign property, capital gains, etc.
And a sky-high illegal Squatter’s Tax.
Oppps,… Can’t pay,…. you then get a free USA deportation travel doc back to the country of origin.,… preferably by a commercial cargo ship.
So the anchor babies are “subject to the jurisdiction.” of the laws of the USA regardless of where they reside at in the world.
Child Protective Services can go into turd world countries and take into protective custody anchor babies that are in conditions that would be considered abusive here in the USA but culturally normal in the turd world country. For example, think of female muslim children, Chinese child labor, English dentist office visits, Swedish euthanasia of minors.
Child Protective Services will need a much bigger budget and their own Special Forces Unit in order to put the anchor babies under “subject to the jurisdiction.”.
Termination of parental rights. By coming to the United States illegally or legally for the sole reason of giving birth the mother is admitting that her home country is not suitable to raise an American child. Send the mother back and put the kid up for adoption. 🤔
This was my first thought after hearing this news. Just have the State Department and Border Enforcement disallow any pregnant women entry on a tourist or other visitor visa.
President Trump needs to do this asap.
And it gets better!
https://xcancel.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/2072054616049721730#m
Yes it does! 😂
Maybe we should offer to house native Europeans who are pregnant?
Are any of you surprised by this SCOTUS decision???? Of course you’re not, any neither am I….
All this decision did was solidify the SCOTUS as an impotent and non serious….ACB, Kavanaugh, Roberts are complete and utter frauds…..
The idea that Birthright citizenship for Illegals is somehow legit is laughable and defies commonsense…..
Heck of a 250th birthday present SCOTUS! With friends like these who needs enemies….
Here is Justice Kavanaugh’s remark concerning a potential statutory remedy:
“But the Order does contravene a federal statute, 8 U. S. C. §1401(a). Congress could—consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment—amend §1401(a) or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But Congress has not yet done so.”
§1401(a) essentially restates the relevant language of the 14thA ( minus the state reference.)
So Kavanaugh is disputing that a Constitutional Amendment modifying the 14th would be required.
My thought for a statutory amendment:
“For purposes of this subsection (a), “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” shall mean that each parent shall be a lawful resident of the U.S. at the time of birth, having thereby relinquished any prior allegience to, and jurisdiction of, a foreign power.”
The five justices in the majority did not think a statutory amendment could fix things, so even if Congress tried to do something, it would get struck down by the courts.
Please, Roberts, you’re funny. Congress won’t even pass the SAVE Act, they’re as big a bunch of cowards as you
How can children of parents “NOT subject to the jurisdiction thereof” suddenly become “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”???? This is crazy!
The same way Wong Kim Ark did: by having lawfully resident parents at the child’s birth.
Still convoluted reasoning as residency is not what grants citizenship and there was no naturalization process for Chinese nationals prior to that case.
Nothing circular about it. Parental citizenship was not required, but lawful residence of the parents existed.
My proposal is conistent with the Wons’ status.
“….exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens … unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But Congress has not yet done so.”
…not yet done so…
because Congress has been (miss fixated upon) trying to slip in ‘amnesty of illegal border crossers’ language into various other legislations for years – without fulfilling a prior legislative ruling to secure the border(s) … 24/7/365 incl holidays …?
Well, someone said that we have 4 votes sewed up for the next time. If we get to replace one of the worms the vote goes to 6-3 in our favor. We will have to wait it out.
In the mean time we can:
deny visa’s for pregnant women,
deport the 50M illegals in the country already,
and dole out consequences for those that illegally financially support illegals.
There is no reason all the Haitians and Somalians can’t be gone in 60 days.
There is no reason all the Haitians and Somalians can’t be gone in 60 days.
Either you forgot the /sarc tag or you should take that to a comedy club.
A Trump Admin official told John Roberts on Fox today that estimate of ’60 days.”
Blackstone may provide perspective on trespass or invasion.
Trespass, in its largest and most extreme sense, signifies any transgression or offense against the law of nature, society, or of the country in which we live; whether it relates to a man’s person, or his property.
This decision encourages trespass with intent to plunder [Webster’s 1828] or invasion [Article IV §4].
Considering the many extreme assaults on our Lives, Liberty, Property, pursuit of Happiness, and consent I lean to the invasion explanation.
Horrible decision !!!!! Against the Constitution.
Seal the borders, shut them down. No immigration whatsoever. Anyone caught trying to sneak across will be shot on sight.
Kavanagh argued that the president doesn’t have the power to unilaterally decide what that law is. He’s right, congress can and should codify it. An EO from Trump would be reversed as soon as a Dem president took power.
I agree with the sentiment of the EO and don’t think the 14th amendment had tourism birthers and millions of illegal aliens in mind when written, but the execution was sloppy.
Flame away folks.
It sure looks like th right case needs to be brought forward. One that overturns Wong Kim Ark!
WKA was a Chinese citizen the very moment he was born here. As with nearly all sovereign nations, Chinese law ensured the child of two Chinese citizens was also a Chinese citizen, even when born outside its borders. It is the same for US citizens. Clearly anyone who is subject to alligence to a foreign nation must first relinquish said citizenship before becoming a US citizen.
The WKA SOCTUS decision willfully ignored this and should have long ago been overturned. So how did WKA decision make it through? There is a likely reason : NBC and foreign usurpation. President Chester Arthur nominated the author, Justice Gray, to SCOTUS to make sure he would write the WKA opinion in a manner to undermine immigration integrity. President Arthur was the first NBC ineligible POTUS usurper. Hussein was the second.
Gray’s opinion referenced a preliminary version of “The Allegiance of the United States under the Present Naturalization Laws” by Horace Binney (Harvard). Binney’s final version of the paper contained none of the faulty arguments and references that Gray chose to use in his decision.
A possible solution: bar entry of any woman of child bearing age.
Won’t undo this but will prevent future illegal people from taking us for suckers.
From an historical perspective, the nomination of ACB may be the most destructive mistake of the President’s two administrations. For whatever reasons, it happened, and her disasterous tenure is only in its youth.
When the mail-in voting and birthright citizenship SCOTUS decisions are combined with Thune’s scuttling of the SAVE Act, the perfect storm is created to destroy our Republic.
It is obvious that Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts don’t seem to able to read. They seem to be motivated by something else.
Yes, many of us have our suspicions of what motivates those two.
Birthright Citizenship means a Foreign Nation only needs an
Army of pregnant Illegal Alien women to take over the USA.
Communist China is already implementing this plan
China has approximately 1.413 billion people.
The SCROTUS is not our friend. A most damaging decision. I am awaiting Jeff Childers’ (Coffee & Covid) piece tomorrow. I can’t wait to see how puts lipstick on this pig of a decision.
DeSantis – I haven’t had an opportunity to read that opinion…when they did the 14th amendment, what they were trying to do was overturn the Dread Scott decision. Dread Scott said, the Supreme Court and Dread Scott said Dread Scott wasn’t a citizen because he was black. He couldn’t sue. Lincoln rejected that. And so what they wanted to say is, “Wait a minute, no, you’re a citizen, you know, regardless of race, and we’re gonna correct that injustice.” That was the purpose of it. It was not to have people show up from China for two weeks, have babies, get them citizenship, and then go back to China. I mean, how ridiculous has this become?
Most of us knew how the Supreme Court was going to rule on Birthright Citizenship. It’s just so hard to officially learn of their decision. At least President Trump had the courage to bring Birthright Citizenship directly before the US Supreme Court. Has any other President done this?
This is correct. I also think the president doesn’t have the power to unilaterally determine this via an EO, which can also just be reversed by another president down the road.
I guess that now means…”don’t let ’em in”
Deport, Deport, Deport!!
That means we get to call the new entry processes into the United States the Roberts protocols.
Stick it him and don’t let anyone forget it.
Alexander Hamilton, from Federalist 78 (1788):
“Whoever attentively considers the different departments of power must perceive, that, in a government in which they are separated from each other, the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them.
The Executive not only dispenses the honors, but holds the sword of the community.
The legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated.
The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever.
It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.”
I am taking these very “angry/frustrating FEELINGS” into my SOUL, and becoming extremely SILENT, … and GOD Breathing into these very uncomforable FEELINGS. Instead of “running away into tv, movies, food, alcohol, drugs (legal or illegal), sex, work, etc ….”, or “lashing out at people/places/things”. BE SILENT! and Just BREATH GOD INTO YOU, and then BREAHING GOD OUT OF YOU!. BE SILENT and “feel these horrible feelings”, and GOD BREATH. Practice this, every day, … this Charged Emotion can be transformed … and build up “GOD POWER” in you, but you have to GOD BREATH into these “charged emotions”. You were educated to either “express these “dark feelings”, or stuff it down. But this NEW WAY will change you over time, GOD POWER coming from “deep inside of you”, will produce “wisdom action”. It is GOD POWER, and you allow GOD to flow through you instead of human power. You can use these “dark emotions” to defeat you or enlighten you to the POWER OF GOD. And you have been given this choice your whole life. You can chose again, and again, and make a better choice. You will get tired of “running away” or acting from out externally on the “people” around you (fuming). What I’m talking about is GROWING UP! I’m using this “event” to “awaken me to SILENCE and GOD BREATHING.
I’m very confused in speaking this stuff aloud to you guys. … I’m getting mixed messages inside me, … do I say this stuff, or just keep SILENT and do it myself (inside). I am asking GOD to guide me. Because for 20-40 years it seemed I was suppose to be SILENT. Internal crisis for me. Do I post this, or delete it.
John Roberts gave us Obamacare and made us return 160 billion Dollars in tariff taxes. Now this. Wow.
barrett and roberts established themselves as judicial whores long ago via their liberal voting records. Instead of evaluating the 14th amendment on bc and striking down The President’s EO as was assumed, these traitors rewrote the law. In doing so they created a global invitation for all illegal foreign freeloaders to come on in for free, free, free. They bastardized our once sacred sovereignty and the longstanding value of legal citizenship.
I believe citizen vigilante is about to get very real, very soon…. today’s decision is the tipping point. And congress is too infected with moral rot, perversion, corruption and leftover neutered dogs to create legislation to end bc…
God save our republic and may patriots arise…
I have bit my tongue all day, now I will unload and some of you will not like it.
President Trump, why the hell did you sign that executive order in the first place? If you had a 4d chess move like having the proof that the 2020 election was a coupe and that all of FJB’s time as president was then null and void, including his supreme court justice, that would have been one thing, but with the people you had at the FBI and Justice at the time of signing the EO, you know that you had nothing to move forward with. Same for proving that obama was an illegitimate president.
You had a stupid idea thinking you could appease MAGA with it while you fumbled around the globe and ignored our domestic situation.
Stupid lame ass timing on your part Trump and now you punt the ball to congress, the same congress that opposes you at every turn. Because of this stupidity, you have loss a big chunk of my respect. Some field general you are. Now you will have to work ten times as hard to regain the trust that you have lost. Stupid.
An illegal giving birth on American soil is now a tax.