Chancellor Fredrich Merz, President Emmanuel Macron, Prime Minister Kier Starmer and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy met in London to discuss their collective next steps in their plan for opposition to Russia.

Politico is reporting that Germany is going to replace the United States as the direct contact for negotiations with Russia; that’s according to a spokesperson for Merz. However, if you read the actual printout from their collective agreement there is nothing of the sort mentioned [SEE HERE].

Instead, what actually exists within the statement are five terms they have agreed upon in order to start direct discussions between Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin.  At least two of the terms are non-starters for Russia:

[…] Conditions that would need to be in place for a just and lasting peace. 

    • First, a stop to the fighting. They called on President Putin to agree to an immediate and complete ceasefire. 
    • Second, the current line of contact should be the starting point for negotiations. International borders must not be changed by force, and Ukraine’s sovereign right to choose its own security arrangements and alliances must be fully respected.  
    • Third, Ukraine must have robust and legally binding security guarantees in place once a ceasefire enters into force, building on commitments made in Berlin in December 2025 and Paris in January 2026. This includes the deployment of the Multinational Force – Ukraine.  
    • Fourth, Russian assets will remain immobilised until Russia ceases its war of aggression and compensates Ukraine for the damage caused by the war. 
    • Fifth, that European security interests must be safeguarded in any deal.  Elements of any negotiation related to the EU and NATO would need the consent of the EU and its Member States and NATO Allies respectively. 
    • [SOURCE]

The #3, #4 and #5 points are not going to go anywhere.

Germany, France, the U.K and/or EU participants are not going to put troops on the ground in Ukraine without United States security guarantees.  President Trump has already rejected that proposal on three occasions.

The Russian sovereign fund that was seized by the EU is not the property of Vladimir Putin; it is wealth belonging to the Russian people and President Putin will not accept that term.  Additionally, two-thirds of the world has been against that seizure bolstering Russia’s position.

The fifth point is laughable.  The EU collective in Brussels is going to be required to give consent to any peace agreement?  Highly doubtful Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin would even entertain that condition.  Ukraine is not an EU member state, and Ukraine is not a NATO member.

Why would the EU put themselves into the conflict resolution when Ukraine is not in the EU.  From a brutally obvious and pragmatic Russian position, this makes no sense.  However, I would look for Putin to do something funny with this, like force the EU to adopt Ukraine first as a ‘put up – or shut up‘ type challenge.

Putin knows the people of Europe do not want the corrupt nation of Ukraine as part of their wealth draining operation.

Hey, at least the ‘coalition of the willing’ is now begging for an audience with Putin.

Share