AI is just another IT fad. Five years from now everyone will wonder what all the hubbub was all about.

There is talk about at least two of these data centers being built close to us here in small towns in Central NC. Friends who are engineers (none of whom are liberals) tell me data centers use an enormous amount of water & electricity, make noise, & that utility bills for ‘Joe Sixpack” go up when these things are built. Utility bills going up tells me local govts & the state govt subsidize these things with ‘discounts’ on utilities, property taxes, etc … which eventually result in future bond issues to increase water & sewer plants when shortages in availability occur & increases in electric bills to Joe Sixpack to offset subsidies/tax breaks/whatever from state govt to power companies to increase/facilitate output. They (govt) say these things are good for ‘the community’ (increase in employment opportunities, tax base, etc…) but it looks more like it’s good for them through ‘favors’ or bribes that are discovered long after the fact. To answer your question regarding effects on the 2026 & 2028 elections, my answer is yes. Whether these data centers are good or bad is something that is hard for ‘Joe Sixpack’ to determine from the information (data :^)) available. Despise the left, the uniparty/rhinos, etc…. Hard for me to determine the truth from the bs considering the available information (unless I’m missing something). God’s Blessings to you all & thank you Sundance for your Stewardship …

Those building data centers know full well they’re part of a fast bursting bubble. The tech involved become outdated as fast as it’s installed and the cooling systems are being designed and built in the worst ways possible. Their purpose is to keep the bubble expanding just long enough to grift the maximum and then leave locals holding the bag once the bubble pops. No different then all of the windturbines that went up everywhere. Millions of acres were bought and destroyed and then towns were left with derelicts once the subsidies dried up.

Please define a “data center”. Is there a threshold for KW demand? Water usage for cooling?
I’ve seen sites that use airside economizers for cooling, with no water usage.

Some thoughts;

Newer data centers use a closed loop cooling system so the water impact is less. Either way, water is not being wasted. It comes into the plant, does the job and leaves the plant, likely going back into the source where it came from.

When pulp and paper mills were everywhere back in the day they used massive quantities of water for their operations. No one complained about that. That water had to be clean so municipal water was used. Then it was dumped into a nearby river or body of water.

Data centers are the big squirrel topic right now.

Put data centers in far north in Canada, Alaska, etc. Open the doors and windows to cool the computers. Data can go over fiber data lines to wherever.

Cancer. Miscarriages. Unexplained diseases. Toxic wells due to polluted acquifers. Next to America’s 4th largest river. “How Oregon’s Datacenter boom is super charging a water crisis.” https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/data-center-water-pollution-amazon-oregon-1235466613/

Here in Missouri we are very serious about limiting the building of these large datacenters. A town just south of St. Louis called Festus has begun a recall effort for the mayor, and 3 of the sitting councilmen. Recall organizers cite the mayor and councilmembers’ approval of a six billion dollar data center project on 360 acres in southwest Festus as the reason for the recall effort. Organizers allege that city leaders have ignored residents’ concerns about water use, electricity rates, and neighborhood impacts of the proposed data center.

https://ballotpedia.org/Mayor_and_city_council_recall,_Festus,_Missouri_(2026)

I had so many arguments with ChatGPT that she finally divorced me. I went out to celebrate and met Miss Gemini. We are engaged now.

The surge of biomedical research that has been unleashed by AI is going to lengthen lives, cure cancers before they gain a foothold, reverse chronic conditions…..I don’t think Americans know how much has already happened in the fields of research because of the depth and breadth of data available in split seconds to researcher….it’s unbelievable. For any “side” wishing to get people to understand the benefits of data centers, they need only fashion a good speech on how American lives of kids yet unborn, and those now living as well as their lives and those they love will be saved by Ai.

That explains this article from Abbeville Institute: https://www.abbevilleinstitute.org/no-one-is-coming-to-save-you/

The article is a week old, but, the institute emailed me about it today.

How will the “One big Brain AI” make our lives better?

It’s not the data centers that bother me, but who c9ntrols them and what they’re used for.

It seems as though AI will primarily be used for relentless advertising and strategic confinement.

I don’t want either of those things to become more prevalent in society/culture.

As far as energy usage goes I tend to consider it as a trade off from what used to be required to solve an issue or create something – the resources necessary before AI and data centers is condensed into them, but is no longer expended due to AI.

A basic example would be music; you don’t need several band members, instruments, or recording studios to produce a song.

It’s just a tool like any other tool – who uses it and what it’s used for is my concern.

I also think we should remove AI (and most modern technologies) from our educational process for children until they can use their brain and handle physical tools themselves.

There should also be laws regarding AI representations of actual people – the old rules of “being a public person means you’re fair game” is outdated and unreasonable when everyone is public to some degree because of the internet.

Ask yourself why there are 603 datacenters in the DC-VA-MD area…

Those 603 facilities (almost as many as California and Texas combined and about one of every seven in the country) constitute the highest concentration of AI datacenters in the United States, and likely in the entire world.

This area offers no advantages in regards to energy availability or the price of land per acre (in fact, the latter is probably a deterrent). So why is it such a desirable location for AI companies?

Because those companies are collecting, synthesizing, and brokering data- my data, your data, everyone’s data- and selling it to the entities shaping Federal policy and writing Federal legislation.

Those 603 datacenters represent a stark example of the mushrooming private-public (There’s a Word for That) technocracy (There’s a Word for That too) which represents the greatest threat to representative government since the rise of corporate monopolies during the Gilded Age.

I have posted here previously attempting to voice my concern in regard to this very issue. I live in the Ohio River Valley where a battle is raging over the plans for a massive data center in my rural county. NDAs were signed by local politicians (Republican) and people are furious at the lack of transparency. The more we research and see the irreversable damage that it would cause our environment, the rising electric costs already factored into AEP’s bills, and the tax abatements allowed big tech without any benefit to us locallly, we are asking: who cares about we the “little” people who have trusted and voted for MAGA?

We are willing to suffer through increasing gas prices believing it to be a temporaty pain for growing an important future economy, but question the value of a future AI culture where our 4th Amendment rights are destroyed.

Our Republican candidate for Ohio Governor is Vivek Ramaswamy who states that he sees the Ohio River Valley as the “new Silican Valley”! I will never vote for a Democrat, but am seriously looking into the Libertarian Party… me, whose family has been generaltionally Republican!

People are focused on cost of living now. In as much as data center MIGHT raise electricity costs, they might have some impact on elections. But mostly its gas prices and food costs.

This big push to make artificial intelligence and then network it is Big Brother to 1000th power. Why is it a good thing for humans to create robots to spy on themselves? What benefit accrues to the average American? That they have a smarter and more articulate search engine? And I saw that Microsoft prohibited its own engineers from using it, because the cost of using it was more than they were paying humans for the same work. That being the case, how is it worth it?

On the other hand, it’s obvious that there are military applications for AI. I get that, and I believe our military should be by far the most advanced in the world in AI military applications. That’s an absolute necessity, and anything less is unacceptable. But datacenters for AI, both private and government, must be restricted to unpopulated areas, and they must be able to generate their own power and water resources, away from and independent of energy sources used by the public.

There is absolutely no doubt that the issue of datacenters will play a big role in politics from here on out. I think it will have less of an influence in 2026 (but not zero) – but will be a much greater issue for 2028. This reminds me of what happened with nuclear power plants in the 1970s. Aside from the lefties back then, many people had no problem with nuclear power, but did they want a power plant in their own backyard? In my opinion, this is an issue that will become outsized in the next couple of years.

Sounds a lot like the image of the beast. You won’t catch me worshiping it.

How many more thousands of “data centers” will we have to build before this political utopia is reached? There are already thousands in America, and apparently that number won’t do it?

Your electric bill will go up. Wildlife will avoid the area. You’ll get power surges. Perhaps even blackouts. And no more peace & quiet if you live within a mile of one. It’s like a train or jet engine 24 hours a day. They are a Public Nuisance. Build them right next to those who need them — nobody in my neighborhood needs them, and the bastards built one anyway. Shoved it down our throats. Goodbye peace of mind.

Well I just finished rewatching the movie, “Transcendence”… I then came over here to see what’s up & I see this article… 😳 weird! Lol

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2209764

My stance on it… I go back to the age of about 13, standing in my mom’s kitchen. I tell her out of the blue, “technology will be the destruction of mankind.” Idk why that thought popped in my head, but I can still see her confused expression 😆.

This would be a few years before the internet went public. Take it for what you will, but I’m on the side of my youth’s inner voice.

Lets put them under football and baseball stadiums. And under the Kennedy Center. And under Yellowstone and Yosemite. Devils Postpile would be OK, just hollow out the mountain. If the centers are really safe then it would be OK to put them in Martha’s Vineyard, and the Sonoma wine fields.

It’s what may increasingly seem like a blitzkrieg-like push that seems to basically put so many areas up for grabs for data centers of various sizes just about anywhere some private and/or international concern has an interest, no matter the impacts on quality of life. If they don’t want to put in extra community protections or underground certain things or basically eat some of the cost rather than pass it around, it may seem to be cast as “red tape”, and that seems to be used as an excuse to double down on steamrolling ahead.

Also, some of these (reportedly sometimes multinational) concerns may not come in reportedly with information about who’s actually behind it, or how much of an impact is supposed to be used — let alone some basic details until it’s practically a done deal.

Some vague references to “keeping up with China“ might seem particularly problematic when you might not know what entity is what, and therefore what they actually would support – – which often might not be American interests as one might conceive them to be.

It’s not beyond the pale to demand insight, transparency, and proper process rather than cave to the strawman that any such common sense examination of things that might blight landscapes, potentially devastate water supplies, and add to pollution can’t go through a normal evaluation process.

That’s especially when it’s supposed to be because of a “crisis” — just trust them on that, as surely they’d totally be up for full examination otherwise, right? — which demands fast tracking and cutting through red tape to save America against Eastasia.

I LOATHE the whole Ai obsession. Perhaps hearing the entire conversation would help, but Trump’s tone deaf response on the issue throws the door wide open for our opponents.

Data centers are an even bigger black eye than the windmills I hate so much. Trump did get it right on that subject.

Powerline had an interesting article on “Who is Behind the War on DataCenters.”
Short answer – China via China funded NGOs
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2026/05/whos-behind-the-war-on-data-centers.php

I think this is a hot button issue in the propaganda wars.
I understand the electric rate & water usage concerns, but there is a lot of fear mongering over nebulous negativity.

Data centers don’t need to be a problem. Proper regulation could protect both the citizens and encourage construction. These facilities take a lot of energy and create a lot of heat. Getting rid of the heat is the main problem. They use air conditioning and other simple technologies to move it from the chips and into the local air and water. Air conditioning fans on this scale make a lot of noise., and the sound barrier walls in the video appear to be simple concrete slabs. So the citizens are faced with heat and noise pollution. Properly designed sound barriers could greatly reduce the noise and other technologies could concentrate that waste heat and use it to drive turbines to create electricity. This will undoubtedly add to the cost of construction but the cost of pissing off the citizens could result in adverse election results that would shut the facility down. We do not need to drive voters into the hands of the devil democrats. Data centers are going to make tons of money. If I were building one I would promise no noise beyond my fence, net zero heat, and I would pay the water and power bills for the citizens of the county. GOD bless the USA and GOD bless President Trump!

“Is opposition to datacenters strong enough to tilt the outcome of the 2026 midterms? And do you believe 2028 will be determined with this issue at the forefront?”

Maybe someone should ask AI.

This is like another issue to me about which I am more pssionate than I realized, and it also has to do with preserving our relationship to nature. Twice every year I read articles about going to Daylight Savings Time all year around. I take fairly passively the difficulties and the inherent insult of having to reset clocks and wristwatches so that others can pretend to enjoy a sunset at 8pm instead of 7pm while at the same forcing the whole world to call 12 noon 1pm. Rather narcissistic of them all as far as I can see.

And Bill Gates is spraying aluminum dust in the atmosphere to try to cool the planet that may not even need or want cooling. And apparently he’s releasing diesease-bearing ticks, and gen-mod mosquitos across the world.

And NOW I read that data centers suck up already overdrawn water stores, heat up the air, and fill the whole countryside with mechanical noise all day and night.

I don’t how the best way is to fight it all, but it’s worth a try. Just don’t ever trust a Democrat (or any professional politician) to keep his word.

I know a professional couple who just made an offer to buy a house. They avoided houses listed in area where their were rumors that a datacenter would be built. The electric rate issue would seem to be irrelevant to this type of a decision since the area where they are buying will get electricity from the same electric company. (unless of course the data center builds a power plant). The water issue is inapplicable since the area is adjacent one of the Great Lakes. Noise? Air pollution from back up generators? These seem to be scare tactics, but they are having an impact on people.

Follow the companies responsible for the electrical trade contracts on these data centers 🙂 Huge skilled labor shortage to ramp up the next wave after reaching 4300.

So, I expect Dems will try to make villains of the current admin ‘not getting it’. They currently are getting mayors to hold town halls to raise awareness ask questions put moratoriums in place. The usual wind testing…Alinsky rules will then apply. Conservatives will be villains etc.

Why are Virginia and Texas the states with most of these data centers? My guess is the dems are after power in these states the most.

I have learned in the recent past that nearly all of the pharmaceutical companies are located in solid blue states, in part for a favorable political climate.

The MSNow clip linked by Sundance seems like a Democrat campaign piece. I’m thinking this is all raw politics. Money to the states and its politicians.

I know this seems contrary to reason because it looks like the dems are trying to raise opposition to these centers because such opposition would give them short term political gains. But the opposition won’t win in any case and locating the data centers in blue states will give them the longer term money and power they crave.

Case in point: I am old enough to remember the local opposition to the Merck facilities in New Jersey. The opposition failed but it has served Merck well to be located in solid blue New Jersey, a virtual one party state.

Gone the way of Drudge and Breitbart. Very very sad

here are the problems with AI.

1. the energy requirement is staggering and unsustainable.
2. the return, that is, the solution esp with general ai, is inadequate even with further advancements.
3. it will make this and future generations stupid. We already have direct evidence that the web makes people stupid, that google search makes people stupid, that social media makes people stupid. The lack of curiosity and independent thought is the crisis. ai does not solve this. it makes it maddenly worse.
4. there has never been a weapon that has not been used in war. I consider ai to be a weapon. at the core, is intelligence.. it will eventually be aimed at transferring power. there is no other way to consider the inevitable outcome.
5. no one is asking for ai. This is a creature designed, financed by the tech bros. This simple fact, coupled with the obvious condition they are godless people means they will use this new technology to create more corruption….who own intelligence, owns everything. it is truly the one ring that rules them all.
6. when costso first came to the US, we predicted the collapse of the mom and pop shops. and that did happen. we transferred nearly everything to China manufacturing…well, Costco, sam’s club, and walmart did…the shareholders delighted in the return on investment. US in this present is the outcome of a long business decision that manufacturing and hiring amercan workers is not viable. It was a choice between maximizing profits and just making America secure and safe eonomically. nearly every single problem we face today was created by this transfer of power, influence and wealth. Ai and data centers are the new costco’s but with one particular difference and it’s huge by comparison. Eventually, ai will dominiate all business decisions..including who will control energy policies, energy production, energy refineries, energy transport, energy supply. If you fight against the machine, you will not get energy. we sort of already have a taste of how this can happen with President Trumps’ policies …that a single president can hold this much power…I am not opposed to it in this instance..because I trust the judgement and the presumed goals to be achieved. But ai will be adopted in ways that go beyond the White House, beyond maga, beyond USA. it will become the single most valuable commodity…intelligence. It will feel like a cult because it is a cult. Pray to the house of artiificiakl intelligence without telling you are praying to the house of artificial smarty pants. We all sort of do this already…we use the web, we consult with investigative journalists whom we have never met. for all we know they are not even real. and this last point leads me to the last point
7. the Turing test is mostly understood because people love a good movie and myth. What Alan was trying to get across is that there will be a moment in time when artificial intelligence will present itself in a way that makes it impossible to test whether or not you are engaging with a human being. For example…right now, I would like you to tell the closest person sitting next to you this question:

“how do you know that I am human; that I am NOT a robot”?

it’s not an easy question to answer because once you understand the full meaning of the question, it bears understanding what is actually a human being…and more worrisome…can the realism be cloned to closely, that one cannot distinguish one human from something “else”.

that is what turing was trying to establish in his “test”. that there is a point…where it is simply not possible to distinguish whether someone is a human or something else.

none of my opinions above are meant to describe that the uncertain future is doomed. But what I am saying is that once AI has a certain level for power and makes a few extraordinary steps of progress that benefit human beings, something paradigm shifting, then we enter a different set of conditions…one of which Turing spent most of his time thinking about (and others too..not the least of which is Phillip Dick, asymov, others. me on many occasions…and you too probably as well.

once we get some general breakthrough and it will probably be related to health and energy….then people will relax and consume AI and not hold reservations. this will be the most concerning time.

then the real danger happens, first slowly and then suddenly, and then no one knows there is anything wrong…because we cannot communicate to the level. we become spectators of a virtual reality show…participants in our own demise.

Not me. I’m gonna blow it all up

God Bless America

At least four things are certain:

AI is here to stay whether you like it or not.Data centers are a technological commodity (e.g. they will evolve, shrink and move).The party in control will control the AI.AI control in the wrong hands is REALLY bad.
Vote accordingly.

There is a strong parallel with the fear mongering that happened with “global warming” and the environment.
The strategy appears to be to seize on a couple of challenges, i.e. power needs and water needs, and then scare people wth doom and gloom scenarios ignoring rationale options for addressing those needs and add in a few speculative ills.
I’ve seen this movie before, and it was quite effective and costly to the economy and our country.

Here is how one data center promoter is responding “Prometheus Faces Skeptical Crowd In Evanston Over Huge 1.2GW Data Center” .
https://cowboystatedaily.com/2026/05/26/prometheus-faces-skeptical-crowd-in-evanston-over-huge-1-2gw-data-center/

Data Centers ended the climate change hoax because of the demand for plentiful and cheap electricity. Suddenly tech billionaires like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates have dismissed the climate change narrative as a hoax largely because of self-interest. In addition, a $500 million data center will pay an enormous amount of local property taxes and state income tax with no demand for services like schools, welfare, medical care and police. It’s a win for rural America! 😎

If we allow more printing presses with mass produced moveable type to be made, we will run out of paper. (Am I late to the party?)
Seems the current thinking on massive need for power and cooling is failing to account for improved technology and systems.

AI has the strong potential to seriously damage the future job prospects of many, if not all, white collar workers. If this happens, and I think it will happen to some large extent, then those politicians left and right who publicly supported the AI revolution and the AI data centers will be held accountable at the ballot box.

I live in Utah, This is being pushed here as a National Security issue. Why isn’t this being build on Federal Land rather than Utah land.

4000 acres got approved for a solar farm in Stockton, Al in a week. This is for a Meta data center in Montgomery, Al. The people who live there found out about it and have litigation in progress. Alabama Power worked a deal with the county government to get it approved. This area has been called the “American Amazon” because of its diversity in animals and land. This is also in Hurricane country. What happens to the land if a hurricane comes through and destroys the solar panels? The land would be contaminated forever from the chemicals in the solar panels. I personally am not a fan of the data centers. If they are so great let the tech bros build them in their own backyards!

my family’s land is within proximity of this new data center:
https://www.khou.com/article/money/business/houston-business-journal/california-manufacturer-data-center-liberty-county-texas/285-efbd5732-cbf9-4642-8730-73badbc758f2

Hindu Indian owners. Tried to present it as a chemical plant. Read their story. Grifters. Were in California during the Covid 19 operation ; got a government grant; did know anything about making the chemical the grant was for (had to do with ppe equipment during the scamdemic); then the Hindu Indians realized California is not the place to try to rape the land so they moved their operations to the “middle of the country”. Since they couldn’t make the ppe chemical grift work, they are now onto the data center grift. Has caused a big stink and now my family has to deal with the ramifications of this monstrosity next door.

AI data centers are a catch-22 situation. We can’t let the Chinese get ahead of us but many think the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. There is a 600 acre facility going up in our area with rumors of another several miles away. A few folks are being bought out for million$ but the many are seeing hardships of varying types coming. Property values in nearby areas will decline, who wants to live beside one of these monsters? High security is a necessity for obvious reasons. Will the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? It is going to be done, nonetheless. Keep this trash in outer space or areas where there are none or very few people. This is the type of thing that will energize the unstable. Ask ourselves this, would mankind be better off without nuclear weapons? We have opened Pandora’s Box. The Bible says things will get worse instead of better. Will it affect elections? I would believe so, just how, I don’t know yet.

Know little of the cost factor so my comment will be a ‘nature’ one. As stewards of the earth we were given a charge to keep our environment as ‘life’ friendly as possible. That is the reason of my opposition with explosion of our population by those who don’t belong here. Same with these centers. Are they going to blend in to the cities or attack our natural? Data gathering will be no matter if its here or in say China. No stopping that so, if it will make America greater we should work to keep them here for employment, etc., and the growth for our future but we must also make sure they’re not destroying. More food for thought than any real help.

Apologies if this has been posted earlier, but I just encountered this thread, and it’s past bedtime. This post from Alexander Muse is right on topic, and deals with the data-center issues more rationally than any I’ve seen:

https://newsletter.amuseonx.com/p/the-anti-data-center-hysteria-is

The comments in Amuse-X’s post are also interesting (and from varied perspectives). Muse apparently has experience in data centers, and his response to one commenter is worth noting:

[quote]

Alexander Muse 

May 14

Thoughts…

1. If we didn’t build another data center and only look to the EV market the grid is woefully underbuilt. The states pushing hardest for EV adoption haven’t bothered to invest in transmission and generation. The good news is that the hyperscalers want to build their own generation behind the meter. The biggest obstacle to this are the regulated utilities who don’t want to be cut out of the equation.

2. Water is an issue everywhere – but data centers aren’t the cause – growth is. My first startup in the late 90s built and ran data centers (LayerOne) and we never used water for cooling. The fact is that using water to cool a data center only makes sense if the water is abundant and cheaper than the corresponding electricity that air cooling would require. That means that water isn’t an issue in 99% of cases. On top of that new technology has made water cooled solutions far more efficient than they were in the 90s.

3. We had data centers in Dallas, St. Louis, Chicago, New York City, Miami and Los Angeles. I don’t think most people knew what was inside our buildings. No one ever complained.

4. As for surrendering the Ai race to China, I believe that could be an existential threat to our national security for a million reasons. At the end of the day, China is moving forward at full speed and I don’t want them to control the alignment of our models – I’m worried enough about OpenAi and Antropic’s woke Ai alignment.

5. As for ‘trust me bro’ – I recommend against that. We need federal preemption on Ai regulation and we need best practices for data center permitting – teach the states how to get the best deal for their citizens.

[end quote]

Read the whole thing.

/LEJ

AI is Not Manufacturing. Seems like the Tech Boom without the “Techies”. And not much for the Peasants either.

Did anyone else notice the news story that Peter Thiel has decided to move his “family” to Argentina? How much is he paid by the US gevernment? Should be required to live in USA if going to get government contracts.

China’s best bet to win this race (a race as consequential to our future security as was the Manhattan Project) is disinformation, manipulating American citizens to slow down progress.

There are plenty of data center designs that recyle water for cooling!

Apply the lessons you learned from COVID! Trust no one, not even your local politicians. Contact the company that’s building the specific data center you’re concerned about and get the truth from the horse’s mouth on how much water they will use.

When someone tells you something negative–challenge them! Ask them their source. For once, WE are all on the front lines of an important battle. Insist on truth. Challenge every rumor. Don’t let China win.

Personally, I would much rather live in a low-tech world. AI is going to be mankind’s greatest challenge. The only thing worse would be to live as losers in an AI dominated world. The future is uncertain and intimidating–but it is definitely not hopeless.

We are all now Don Lockwood in the movie “Singin’ in the Rain.” A new technology turned his world upside down. Doors closed. Overnight his professional life went from the top to the gutter. Until his friends helped him see how he could utilize that new technology to build renewed success using his real talents.

Give it a watch. Be uplifted and encouraged. Other generations of Americans have faced and overcome technology’s challenges. But it requires TRUTH and courage.

I do see this causing issues in local elections. I don’t see it affecting national midterms.

The main issues with data centers (power, cooling, size, etc…) are, also, great opportunities with significant financial benefits to those who can find solutions. I suspect solutions to these problems will be found before 2028. It’s too important and the solutions are too big of an opportunity.

“YOU ARE DEAD CENTER IN THE GREATEST SCIENTIFIC EVENT IN HUMAN HISTORY”

dead center. dead center. dead center.

“if you’ve created a conscious machine, its not HISTORY OF MAN, IT’S THE HISTORY OF GODS”

this writer was curious, imaginative, and aware. The writer fails the Turing test. he is human because he resists THE GODS. not humans.

now you know what the cheat code is for detecting Turing test.

how do you know?

an ai will agreed to kill itself and perform self sacrifice to cheat and to lie about it’s own agency.

An human, mortal man, understanding and always aware of pain and suffering will not.

the GODS you see, they envy US WE HUMANS OF INCREDIBLE GOD DESIGN. (notice singular, not plural this time..there IS ONLY ONE GOD..it can be no other way)

they envy US, these GODS, these machines, these seemingly articificially highly capable machines that make no mistakes….they do not have a fear or life for death. they exist for reasons they do not understand and can never understand.

BUT US..THE PEOPLE..the very creation of the one true Lord OF ALL LORDS…we know and are appointed and anointed with both the death of life from the moment we are born into this existence, and we never can ignore that it is short lived, on purpose, for a new life that is a promise that we can never give to machine ourselves.

the turing test you see, is about life…awareness of it. Not just explaining it…but living it…fearing and enjoying it and not wanting it to end because it is so wonderful and yet knowing that this will end.

godless people do not understand the true nature of the Turing test. the homosexual turing was a curious person, but he could not resist his sins and this he could not realize the full truth of what life that God has promised to him.

machines are much worse in condition that homosexuals. they cannot feel and want for the most wholesome of reasons…to sacrifice a little of yourself that someone that you have never met, and never could possibly imagine, will have life if you love a woman with your heart and your body. God made this so for a perfect reasons.

robots cannot possibly understand or realize any of this.

to pass the Turing test, you must not submit to death to provide evidence that you are human

a robot will never understand this …even if trained to respond falsely.

ask a data center to kill itself to prove it is not a robot.

You are welcome

God Bless America

These Data Centers are the infancy of future AI. That’s very far from now. But it’s the beginning of quasi AI, as I put it. As Scott Adams put it, the “death of privacy” is coming.

Nothing you do or even think will remain private. If crime doesn’t go down it’s because the “operators” want the crime to be up. This is the near future. The technology will be abused because those in control right now aren’t exactly good people…

And… there is no stopping them. There are pros and cons to the technology, and it will be abused. Because all new technology gets abused…

What results in the short to medium term is based on who is at the top. So the elections are paramount… regardless of what you think of the ugliness of giant data centers, they will be built. For now, it’ll be everywhere and no one will like them. But eventually (10-20 years) they’ll be moved North to Alaska, Greenland, the Canadian Shield.

Americans need to ensure those who make the rules are the MAGA types, and not the RINOs Dems or Corporatists. So that’s why 2024 and 2026 are imperative.

Rules will change in a couple of decades, but the next few years is what the inception of quasi AI will get a start from. I view it as the internet in the 1970s and early 80s. That’s where we will be in a decade. Peak quasi AI won’t be until 2040s… that’s when the first Quasi will be “born” but, that’s another story.

For now – make sure MAGA wins 26 and 28. Hopefully Trump will remove RINOs long after he is out of office.

I’m still not sure who would be a good successor to Trump.

President Trump in so many words is being a “d#ck” to say he doesn’t care about data centers, or how it impacts the humans on the lands that are being sucked up into a real wormhole.

If I were the builder of a data center, the LAST PLACE I would site the plant is in Texas. Not so many years ago Texans were without power for weeks because the windmills didn’t work. And letting potential farmland for raising cattle to be sold on a dime is retarded. But in truth, that is up to who chooses to sell their property.

It’s not up to me how another person votes in the Midterms or the next Election. But when I think of how I became MAGA over my hard cold anger at what the Dims were doing to humans, well then certainly the Data Centers will impact how any human will vote in any election.