CBS has rewritten their storyline as they now claim their “source” has reversed position. Originally, CBS claimed the U.S. Attorney in the Northern District of Illinois was investigating the mentally unstable E. Jean Carroll, the woman who falsely accused President Trump of rape sometime approximately 30 or 40-years ago, she’s not sure.
Now CBS is reporting their source changed the story and the DOJ investigation is actually into the American Future Republic PAC, which is a non-profit run by Reid Hoffman, the man who funded the fraudulent political lawsuit filed by E. Jean Carroll. A substantive difference in narrative.
(Via CBS) – […] “On Wednesday evening, a source familiar with the matter told CBS News that the investigation was focused on whether Carroll had committed perjury during a deposition in connection with her civil lawsuits against Mr. Trump in which she alleged he had sexually abused and defamed her.
On Thursday, however, that source followed up and said Carroll is not the target of the investigation, which is focused on funding that Hoffman’s nonprofit, American Future Republic, provided to help cover some of her legal team’s expenses.
[…] Carroll accused Mr. Trump of sexually abusing her in a New York City department store dressing room in the mid-1990s, and she published an account of the encounter in New York Magazine in 2019. Mr. Trump subsequently denied assaulting her and said Carroll wasn’t his “type.” In 2019, Carroll sued Mr. Trump for defamation, but the case stalled in court.
She then filed a second defamation lawsuit in 2022, adding a claim of rape under ¹New York’s Adult Survivors Act.
Carroll sued Mr. Trump in two civil lawsuits accusing him of sexual abuse and defamation. In 2023, a jury found Mr. Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation for comments he made in 2022. Carroll was awarded $5 million in damages. (read more)
¹The New York Adult Survivors Act was written by NY legislature specifically to create a legal mechanism for E Jean Carroll to file the lawsuit.
The Adult Survivors Act (ASA) is a New York State law that created a one-year window, from November 24, 2022, to November 24, 2023, allowing adult survivors of sexual assault to file civil lawsuits even if the statute of limitations had expired. {source}
The entire purpose of the ASA was to give Ms. Carroll a window to file the lawsuit against President Trump. Her lawsuit was the only one filed during the one-year window. That’s Lawfare in action.


Sure, the DOJ in Democommunist Illinois would be investigating Eager Jean.
Illinois is one of the three most blue states in the US. Illinois consistently votes blue. Its govenor is Pritzker. Plus Carroll isn’t being investigated Reid Hoffman is.
Please distinguish Chicago apart from Illinois. Chicago is blue; most of Illinois is red. Unfortunately, a Pritzker is Governor and craves to be your POTUS. If you desire to rig an election or rig a trial; Chicago is where you need to go.
She’s nuttier than a snickers bar!
Just like the Kavanaugh hearings.
Both Glazey-Ford and Carroll did not provide the date of the “assault” in order to avoid the situation in which the accused can provide proof that he wasn’t there. For example: “Hey, you said it happened on May 15, 1996, but I was visiting my aunt in Switzerland at that time. Here’s a copy of my old passport with the border stamps. Bye!”
If an accuser can’t narrow it down to a reasonable timeframe, then the charges should be automatically dismissed.
In a normally functioning court of law, it would’ve been.
But when a law is SPECIFICALLY WRITTEN to trap the man that they want trapped when all other doors have been slammed in the faces of Democrat Lawfare cheaters, what more do you expect? From a Congresswoman’s hand slipping into the pocket of Brazen Ford’s lawyer to this sleazebag limited law, designed solely for adding one more phony charge against the President that Democrats fear most, there should be no doubt in any rational, semi-intelligent person’s mind that Democrats are grasping at any straw possible to keep from falling off the Cliff of Lies. Their only hope is to have Joebozo’s illegals flood the polls and outvote Americans in all future elections. Then they can add states (not just DC and Puerto Rico but maybe even Cuba, Venezuela, Ukraing and Canada, etc) as well. The SCOTUS would likely not have any English speaking justices as they would come from around the world, most importantly China, Iran and North Korea. That would be the Democrat’s dream team!
Christine Ballsy Ford (as Rush called her) with her baby girl voice. She really cashed out bigly for her absurd claims.
A really, really stale one.
Nuttier than squirrel doo
Yes, but Snickers bars are likeable.
Nuttier than Fruit cake
Grandma’s rules…can’t say it, no matter how much I want to!!
My Nana told me never say anything, do anything, or take a picture I was not willing to share with her.
Been following it for 55 years…she had a large wooden spoon and was not afraid to use it.
My Nana said tha I should believe nothing that I hear & only 1/2 of what I see without a thorough/complete investigation.
Advice that has served me well all of my life.
I got the same advice as well. 👍👍👍
Is Nana of Italian heritage by some chance? I’m familiar with Italian women wielding wooden spoons. 🙂
Or Irish?
Nonna is Italian for Grandmother.
My not-Italian mother had a very solid souvenir paddle from the Lake Superior cruise ship SS Wayne. I watched the advertising wear off. When it finally broke, she just happened to be planning a trip to Duluth, and, sure enough, she bought a new one.
There’s this:
My favorite Disney movie. The art work and the music are outstanding.
Me too. Bambi & Thumper & Flower 4ever! 🌸
So hiding the truth is Best, so that criminals can continue to prosper? That is the wisdom here???
Seriously? That’s what you got from my comment? You must be new here… 🙄
I think that we need to incentive these people to not commit lawfare; I’m very much a traditionalist so tar, feather, and the riding of a rail sounds good.
Seriously, after the mid-terms we need to come up something, any suggestions.
I’ve always been a fan of drawing and quartering.
It just isn’t as effective if you omit the first step, hanging. Hanging, Drawing and quartering.
The Patriot Act provides the legal means to literally make people disappear from sight. Indefinitely.
Personally, I want that travesty REPEALED, genuinely!!!
Will all the MSM talking heads apologize to President Trump for saying he was unfairly targeting the crazy b**ch?
Stop insulting female dogs!
No.
She would’ve been 52 years old. 2 years old. Maybe if you were a supermodel with excellent DNA you would be hot at that age, but there’s no way Trump was attracted to her almost 30 years ago and would’ve show any interest. At that time he was a multimillionaire probably, not a billionaire, but even millionaires can pick from thousands of attractive women to date or sleep with. The whole things is ridiculous, unbelievable, and disgusting.
Exactly. Plus, Trump was already very wealthy, and very famous, 30 years ago. The idea of him strolling through the lingerie department at Bergdorf’s, unrecognized and without an entourage, is absurd. The man doesn’t “shop” or browse the way we do. He has a layered staff to handle these mundane tasks.
I’m glad they’re DOJ is investigating Reid Hoffman, rather than the dessicated loon he’s funded. So many nefarious activities to zero in on, but most important, his funding, and thus control, of a large chunk of AI. It would be delicious irony if he was taken down thanks to the fabrications of some old crone.
If that day happens, good ole E Jean deserves an extra pudding cup. Right after 4 pm diaper change.
BTW, a few Reid Hoffman “activities”:
https://brief.bismarckanalysis.com/p/reid-hoffmans-backstage-role-in-ai
https://nlpc.org/corporate-integrity-project/nlpc-again-opposes-reid-hoffman-for-re-election-to-microsoft-board-of-directors/
Correct on The Donald not going anywhere alone. Met him 3 separate times in somewhat informal settings, beginning in 1991 and each time he had 3-4 security guys with him. Even just walking in the non-public area of his own hotel/casino.
Plus there is no way he would have been allowed to enter the women’s dressing room where EJean claims to have been raped by him.
The diaper change will be less amusing when it’s yours.
I can’t see her being hot at any age. Even after much alcoholic consumption.
Try Vodka.
E. Jean Carroll is 50 shades of cray-cray.
Crazy blank. She needs a straight jacket.
The lying B**** fabricated a story to interfere and overthrow the existing head of Govt’….. treason sounds like a good charge.
Actually, Law and Order wrote it. She plagiarized it.
But she was paid very, very well for her performance. This saga has a bit of a Weissmann twist to it with a side of Elias or Holder. The unholy 3 of the Democrat Party!!
Fruity as a nutcake, Loony as a tune, Milky in the filbert, Crazy as a bedbug. And those are her good qualities.
ROFLOL!!!
She also paints trees in the forest by her home.
And rocks in the stream bed behind it.🤡
This woman is an absolute goblin! This has to be the longest appellate process in the country, this entire kabuki theatre of a civil suit should be thrown out with extreme prejudice!
And as far as the media is concerned, just when you think you can’t despise them enough, they continue to find ways to best themselves.
When Marcel Marceau goes drag this is what you get!
Sure Jan.
Did we just identify another leaker?
Champerty?
Reid Hoffman also bribed the Bidens by paying Hunter’s taxes.
And buying his artwork.
There are actually two cases between Trump and Carroll. One is for the alleged assault, and the for libel based on Trump’s calling her a liar. One has already made it to SCOTUS, and has been listed for a cert conference eleven times (possibly a record). The other case is on its way up for the Second Circuit, so maybe the Court is waiting to consolidate them for appeal.
The one before SCOTUS now is Trump v. Carroll, the case filed by E. Jean Carroll for an alleged assault at Bergdorf Goodman’s department store in New York City more than 20 years before. It was heard by a federal jury in SDNY. The trial judge was a Clinton appointee. Trump lost in the Second Circuit, so is now appealing to SCOTUS.
The jury entered a verdict in favor of Carroll, no doubt in part because of the testimony of some other women who claimed that Trump had grabbed or groped them at other times in other years and other places (one allegedly took place on an airplane). Trump’s counsel objected to the introduction of this evidence as speculative and prejudicial.
The petition asks the Court to grant review on the following issues:
(1)Whether Federal Rule of Evidence 415 overrides Rule 403’s requirement to balance the probative value of temporally remote propensity evidence against its prejudicial effect before such evidence can be admitted?; (2) Whether Federal Rule of Evidence 413(d) authorizes the admission of temporally remote propensity evidence that the defendant committed the “crime” of “sexual assault” when the alleged prior act did not constitute a crime or a sexual assault?; and (3) Whether Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b)(2) permits the admission of “modus operandi” or “corroboration” evidence of prior “bad acts” without establishing a non-propensity purpose of the evidence, such as identity, absence of mistake, or another enumerated exception in Rule 404(b)(2)?
Propensity is the tendency to commit particular acts, so Carroll was basically arguing that he’d grabbed women in other places in other years, so the jury should accept that it was likely that he’d done it to her. The problem with this is how specific and similar (including in time, place and in number) must the prior acts be to establish a person’s tendency to repeat the behavior. The appeals courts have interpreted these rules differently, so it would be a likely case for SCOTUS to take in and decide the official interpretation.
It takes four votes to grant cert. Whether the fact that two of the justice have also been accused of indecent behavior by women in the past, and have vehemently denied these claims will factor into the Court’s decision, I don’t know. If the Court does accept cert, expect there to be calls for Thomas and Kavanaugh to recuse themselves. Only they can decided whether to recuse themselves.
The other case is for libel, and, among other mistakes, the judge would not let Trump argue that his statement that her being a liar was protected opinion, because the first verdict had established this ‘”fact.” The deadline for a cert petition has not passed, so I expect Trump’s attorneys are working on it, and it will certainly be filed on time.
Great explanation, thanks.
Isn’t that NY Adult Survivors Act that was designed to be used against PT and was only used against him effectively a bill of attainder?
Since it doesn’t specifically name him, probably not. Others could have filed lawsuits, but didn’t.
I might be mistaken here, but back when that suit was still in court I remember some article saying that one or more of the sponsors of that bill referred to the intent of the bill being to nail Trump. Of course they may have said that somewhere other than on the floor during session and so it might not be in the official record.
Yes, they did name Trump, but the law itself is general. It’s the language in the law itself that is controlling.
I hope they ruin Hoffman. He is a nut with money.
Personally, I don’t refer to most people as crazy any more. Evil. Wicked. Those are words that more aptly apply to the Reid Hoffmans of the world who seem to derive sadistic pleasure from chaos, destruction and nihilism. Hoffman ain’t crazy, he knows what he wants. We just can’t imagine souls like his actually want such things … Jokers do exist in this world, and Joker was a sane man – evil by choice.
She is such a liar.
She’s too crazy to know she’s a liar. She should be locked away for life at some place where she can play monopoly all day long and pretend she’s Trump’s wife. That’s what this is all about in my opinion. She’s a stalker.
The idiot Julie Kelly also looks like an idiot, again!
No surprise here. CBS has a long history of faking news.
CBS = Continuous Bull ****
Donald Trump probably has never been near a BG dressing room, much less could find one. Also the Gentleman’s store is across 5th Avenue. I could see him visiting the tailor there but not accompanied by that wack job.
This woman should be under multiple investigations, along with the judge, jury and NY appeals court judges.
NY changes a rape law to enable who… out pops E Jean Carroll… 6.4 cent question who are her handlers…
Did anybody else get charged for rape due to this law being passed…..
Read to the bottom my friend.
“ The entire purpose of the ASA was to give Ms. Carroll a window to file the lawsuit against President Trump. Her lawsuit was the only one filed during the one-year window. That’s Lawfare in action”.
Sundance always does the research, with sources and citations. Much appreciated Sundance.
I agree, there must be a paper/digital trail somewhere.
exactly. is there any doubt that usaid or cia along with the pinko rinodumbocratts planned this out much like j6 planned insurrection…
I refuse to believe a billionaire could walk around in Bergdorf Goodman’s without being swarmed by salespeople working on commission.
I also can’t believe a billionaire would walk around alone in NYC in public without assistants and personal security.
And you’d be right. Trump always had an entourage of sorts when he was out and about in NYC back in the day. This woman wouldn’t have gotten within shouting distance of him. She’s just a retard that the commies used to attack him.
Ain’t no way on Gods Green Earth that PDJT or any man would touch that thing with a 10ft pole.
Whether one believes Carroll’s claims or Trump’s denials, the unanswered questions surrounding this case are too significant to simply wave away as partisan noise.
The late disclosure of outside funding by Hoffman, the extraordinary legal pathway created by the Adult Survivors Act, and the breathtaking size of the judgments against Trump — including the staggering $83.3 million defamation award, which many see as confiscatory rather than compensatory — have fueled legitimate concerns about fairness, proportionality, and due process.
What once appeared untouchable in the public narrative (MeTwo) is now being reexamined under a far harsher legal spotlight, and the DOJ’s investigation suggests that the story may be far more complicated than Carroll’s allies once insisted.
One more thing: this story is simple. Ms. Carroll lied. Many encouraged her to do it. The jury bought portions of the lies. Now it’s coming under less biased scrutiny.
Laws that resurrect claims long barred by the statute of limitations raise due process problems. Evidence is gone, memories have faded, witnesses are dead or can’t be found: all of this makes it very difficult for the defendant to put on an adequate defense.
While there might be an argument for allowing such suits if the assault happened when the plaintiff was a minor, Carroll was middle-aged when this allegedly happened and could have filed within the existing statute of limitations . That she didn’t suggest that this whole thing was fabricated years later.
“not my type” is actually a brilliant public statement by Donald J. Trump. Brilliant. Everyone who looks at E. Jean Carroll and Donald Trump’s taste in women knows she’s full of sh!t.
There was a meme in 45 admin…
He was asked how he slept at night…his response was epic if true…
“Naked with a supermodel”….
The avalanche of false charges against men has already begun. It’s going to get MUCH worse if there are no consequences to females lying.
As a father I never want my kids to falsely accuse anyone so I hope Ms Carroll gets everything coming her way. May she reap what she’s sown.
The DOJ staff for the NDIL is embedded with the IL corruption machine. It doesn’t matter who the president appoints to lead this office, it’s always the same outcome. They trip over political corruption on the way to work each day and just can’t seem to figure it out.
When they do indict someone, it’s two generations too late (Mike Madigan, Ed Burke, et al) or for political reasons Rod Blago. The entire state is an open-air corruption market and they just can’t figure it out. I wonder why?
An accuser not capable of naming a time, day, date, month, season, or year prevents a defense from being established which was the desired result. This case should not have come to trial.
The scary part for all should be if this can be orchestrated against a former POTUS / presidential candidate, how many Jane’s and Joe’s and faced this?
This nasty, ugly, vile, mentally ill woman SHOULD be investigated for her serial lying accusing multiple men of raping her.
lol. Another leak trap that was waaaay too good to pass up.
bat crazy
CBS, living up to their real name, the Communist Broadcasting System. This whole “lawfare” issue needs to be dealt with harshly, and I hope this gets addressed.
I had a good laugh by merely reading the catagories that Sundance has previously posted the shifting sands of the EJC story.
EJC is NOT a buxom woman such as Monica Lewinsky was for Bill Clinton. But he swore up and down it was only his cigar that had sex with her.
I for one have never believed that Trump would go anywhere near EJC. Look at those legs. She’s a scrawny chicken.
Reid Hoffman would have done better by EJC if he advised her to be wearing a BLUE dress so that he could put Trump in the same camp of the very sexually frustrated and psychotic Clinton family.
CBS is being prudent all of sudden . Good thing because Trump has not lost one lawsuit so far about FAKE NEWS.
YUUUUK NOT EVEN WITH JOES
I seem to remember that a Democrat Lawmaker was also caught up in this. Or was that case quietly settled out if court?
Knobby knees Carroll. Plus, in the olden days women’s dressing rooms had an attendant and a locked door. No men allowed.
How far we have fallen.
I seem to remember that dress was a Donna Karan and it came out in 2000 or thereabouts. Long after the supposed assault took place.
This constant flood of “misreporting” (lies?) seems to always be against Trump. Can’t be accidental. When will the lawsuits be filed? Sooner the better.
The Chicago office has not opened an investigation….
Maybe another office has.
Is she emaciated because of liar’s guilt or has she always been a hag?
It will be interesting if they get Carroll to “flip” on all the actors behind her. She is just the type to spill the beans if facing federal time.
There are two types of “stories” produced by the Corrupt Corporate Media:
1. Fake news
2. PSYOP’s
Nothing in the media is “the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.”
Believe nothing. Verify through Sundance.
What a shame that she is not being prosecuted. If this were a democrat administration, not only the accuser but also immediate family and friends would receive the FBI raid treatment and indictments.
Once they obtain evidence that her defense was paid for by an outside entity, then they can charge her.
Totally disgusting lawfare