Many of you may remember back in 2024 I strongly urged President Trump to consider appointing Harriet Hageman as CIA Director for very specific reasons and intents. Watch this video below and you will see why she was my preferred choice.
Representative Hageman has just found an important trail to discover the missing documents, recordings and transcripts that were destroyed by the January 6 Committee. WATCH:
Keep in mind that former AAG Mary McCord was working for the J6 Committee at the time period being discussed. When the J6 Committee closed, McCord went to work directly with Jack Smith.
McCord was inside the J6 Committee feeding information to the DOJ and Jack Smith. McCord then went to work for Jack Smith.
Always scheming, organizing and planning in the background of Washington DC, Mary McCord was conducting surveillance of an Oathkeeper chat room and sending information to the FBI following the November 2020 election, and in the runup to the January 6, 2021, protest.
[SOURCE]
This is interesting on a variety of levels, because we have documented Mary McCord working on the Trump-Russia fabrication [FISA warrant], the CIA [Ukraine] impeachment fabrication [as key staff], the January 6th Committee fabrication [again staff], and the Jack Smith fabrication. Now we see Mary McCord actively setting up the “insurrection narrative” ahead of the J6 protests.
It appears Mrs. McCord then forwarded the email to someone [REDACTED], likely within the J6 Committee or Jack Smith investigation on Sept 24, 2021.
There’s a reason why the J6 Committee deleted the records of their activity, an angle missed by most. When you understand what they hid, and why they did it, you then understand why current Speaker of The House Mike Johnson will not go near the subject.
The J6 targets were identified through a collaboration between the legislative research group and the FBI. [That’s unlawful by the way – but that’s another matter]. The FBI contracted Palantir to identify the targets using facial recognition software and private sector databases.
Once identified, the targets were then searched in the NSA database for a fulsome context of identity. All subsequent electronic metadata of the targets was retrieved and utilized in prosecution; however, no one ever discovered this was the collaborative method. That has not come out yet.
Ultimately, the J6 Committee hiding and deleting their files and operational techniques was due to several issues. They really didn’t have a choice, given the unknowns of an incoming Republican majority.
First, the collaboration with the FBI is unconstitutional. Legislative officers are not law enforcement officers. There is a separation of powers issue.
Second, ultimately – and most consequentially – all of the participants did not want the American public aware of the mass surveillance techniques that were carried out as part of the ’round up.’ That’s where FBI operation Arctic Frost appears in the conversation.
The House Subcommittee on Oversight released a report, [SEE HERE] and overview [SEE HERE], highlighting just how political the J6 Committee was. The report outlines how Nancy Pelosi structured the J6 Committee for political intents, and the longer report showcases the evidence of how Liz Cheney assisted.
WASHINGTON– Committee on House Administration’s Subcommittee on Oversight Chairman Barry Loudermilk (GA-11) released his “Initial Findings Report” on the events of January 6, 2021 as well as his investigation into the politicization of the January 6th Select Committee. (more)
[SOURCE]
The last bullet point has a name. The “Select Committee staff”, who met with Fani Willis, was likely Mary McCord.
If there is one corrupt DC player who has escaped scrutiny for her corrupt endeavors, it would be Mary McCord.
More than any other Lawfare operative, within Main Justice, Mary McCord sits at the center of every table in the manufacturing of cases against Donald Trump. {GO DEEP} Mary McCord’s husband is Sheldon Snook; he was the right hand to the legal counsel of Chief Justice John Roberts.
When the Carter Page FISA application was originally assembled by the FBI and DOJ, there was initial hesitancy from within the DOJ National Security Division (DOJ-NSD) about submitting the application, because it did not have enough citations in evidence (the infamous ‘Woods File’). That’s why the Steele Dossier ultimately became important. It was the Steele Dossier that provided the push, the legal cover needed for the DOJ-NSD to submit the application for a Title-1 surveillance warrant against the campaign of Donald J. Trump.
When the application was finally assembled for submission to the FISA court, the head of the DOJ-NSD was John Carlin. Carlin quit working for the DOJ-NSD in late September 2016, just before the final application was submitted (October 21,2016). John Carlin was replaced by Deputy Asst. Attorney General, Mary McCord.
♦ When the FISA application was finally submitted (approved by Sally Yates and James Comey), it was Mary McCord who did the actual process of filing the application and gaining the Title-1 surveillance warrant.
A few months later, February 2017, with Donald Trump now in office as President, it was Mary McCord who went with Deputy AG Sally Yates to the White House to confront White House legal counsel Don McGahn over the Michael Flynn interview with FBI agents. The surveillance of Flynn’s calls was presumably done under the auspices and legal authority of the FISA application Mary McCord previously was in charge of submitting.
♦ At the time the Carter Page application was filed (October 21, 2016), Mary McCord’s chief legal counsel inside the office was a DOJ-NSD lawyer named Michael Atkinson. In his role as the legal counsel for the DOJ-NSD, it was Atkinson’s job to review and audit all FISA applications submitted from inside the DOJ. Essentially, Atkinson was the DOJ internal compliance officer in charge of making sure all FISA applications were correctly assembled and documented.
♦ When the anonymous CIA whistleblower complaint was filed against President Trump, for the issues of the Ukraine call with President Zelensky, the Intelligence Community Inspector General had to change the rules for the complaint to allow an anonymous submission. Prior to this change, all intelligence whistleblowers had to put their name on the complaint. It was this 2019 IGIC who changed the rules. Who was the Intelligence Community Inspector General? Michael Atkinson.
When ICIG Michael Atkinson turned over the newly authorized anonymous whistleblower complaint to the joint House Intelligence and Judiciary Committee (Schiff and Nadler chairs), who did Michael Atkinson give the complaint to? Mary McCord.
Yes, after she left main justice, Mary McCord took the job of working for Chairman Jerry Nadler and Chairman Adam Schiff as the chief legal advisor inside the investigation that led to the construction of articles of impeachment. As a consequence, Mary McCord received the newly permitted anonymous whistleblower complaint from her old office colleague Michael Atkinson.
KEY: Michael Atkinson was forced to testify to the joint House impeachment committee about the CIA whistleblower rule change and the process he authorized and participated in as the Intelligence Community Inspector General. Adam Schiff sealed that deposition, and no one has ever discussed what Atkinson said when questioned.
House Speaker Mike Johnson (Legislative Branch) can unseal and release that testimony to the CIA or ODNI (Executive Branch), and Tulsi Gabbard who is in charge of the ICIG can declassify Michael Atkinson’s deposition. However, Speaker Mike Johnson has to transfer it from the legislative to the executive, and unfortunately it does not appear that Speaker Johnson wants to open that can-of-worms – at least, not willingly.
Moving on…
♦ During his investigation of the Carter Page application, Inspector General Michael Horowitz discovered an intentional lie inside the Carter Page FISA application (directly related to the ‘Woods File’), which his team eventually tracked to FBI counterintelligence division lawyer, Kevin Clinesmith. Eventually Clinesmith was criminally charged with fabricating evidence (changed wording on an email) in order to intentionally falsify the underlying evidence in the FISA submission.
When John Durham took the Clinesmith indictment to court, the judge in the case was James Boasberg.
♦ In addition to being a DC criminal judge, James Boasberg is also a FISA court judge who signed-off on one of the renewals for the FISA application that was submitted using fraudulent evidence fabricated by Kevin Clinesmith. In essence, now the presiding judge over the FISA court, Boasberg was the FISC judge who was tricked by Clinesmith, and now the criminal court judge in charge of determining Clinesmith’s legal outcome. Judge Boasberg eventually sentenced Clinesmith to 6 months probation.
As an outcome of continued FISA application fraud and wrongdoing by the FBI, in their exploitation of searches of the NSA database, Presiding FISC Judge James Boasberg appointed an amici curiae advisor to the court who would monitor the DOJ-NSD submissions and ongoing FBI activities.
Who did James Boasberg select as a FISA court amicus? Mary McCord.
♦ SUMMARY: Mary McCord submitted the original false FISA application to the court using the demonstrably false Dossier. Mary McCord participated in the framing of Michael Flynn. Mary McCord worked with ICIG Michael Atkinson to create a fraudulent whistleblower complaint against President Trump; and Mary McCord used that manipulated complaint to assemble articles of impeachment on behalf of the joint House Intel and Judiciary Committee. Mary McCord then took up a defensive position inside the FISA court to protect the DOJ and FBI from sunlight upon all the aforementioned corrupt activity.
You can clearly see how Mary McCord would be a person of interest if anyone was going to start digging into corruption internally within the FBI, DOJ or DOJ-NSD.
What happened next….
November 3, 2021 – In Washington DC – “Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) and the House Jan. 6 Select Committee has tapped Mary McCord, who once ran the Justice Department’s National Security Division, for representation in its fight to obtain former President Donald Trump’s White House records. (read more)
Yes, that is correct. After seeding and guiding all of the Lawfare attacks against candidate Donald Trump, then President-Elect Donald Trump, then President Donald Trump, Mary McCord took up a key legal position inside the J6 Committee to continue the Lawfare against President Trump after he left office.
But wait…. remember the stories of the J6 investigative staff going to work for Jack Smith on the investigation of Donald Trump, that included the raid on Mar-a-Lago? Well, Mary McCord was a member of that team [citation]; all indications are that her efforts continued as a quiet member of the Special Counsel team
That’s the context; now I want to go back a little.
First, when did Mary McCord become “amicus” to the FISA court? ANSWER: When the court (Boasberg) discovered IG Michael Horowitz was investigating the fraudulent FISA application. In essence, the FISA Court appointed the person who submitted the fraudulent filing, to advise on any ramifications from the fraudulent filing. See how that works?
Now, let’s go deeper….
When Mary McCord went to the White House, with Sally Yates, to talk to White House Counsel Don McGhan, about the Flynn call with Russian Ambassador Kislyak, and the subsequent CBS interview with VP Pence, where Pence’s denial of any wrongdoing took place, the background narrative in the attack against Flynn was the Logan Act.
The construct of the Logan Act narrative was pure Lawfare, and DAG Sally Yates with Acting NSD AAG Mary McCord were the architects.
Why was the DOJ National Security Division concerned with a conflict between what Pence said on CBS and what Flynn said about his conversations with Kislyak?
This is where a big mental reset is needed.
Flynn did nothing wrong. The incoming National Security Advisor can say anything he wants with the Russian ambassador, short of giving away classified details of any national security issue. In December of 2016, if Michael Flynn wanted to say Obama was an a**hole, and the Trump administration disagreed with everything he ever did, the incoming NSA was free to do so. There was simply nothing wrong with that conversation – regardless of content.
So, why were McCord and Yates so determined to make an issue in media and in confrontation with the White House?
Why did the DOJ-NSD even care? This is the part that people overlooked when the media narrative was driving the news cycle. People got too stuck in the weeds and didn’t ask the right questions.
Some entity, we discover later was the FBI counterintelligence division, was monitoring Flynn’s calls. They transcribed a copy of the call between Flynn and Kislyak, and that became known as the “Flynn Cuts”, as described within internal documents and later statements.
After the Flynn/Kislyak conversation was leaked to the media, Obama asked ODNI Clapper how that call got leaked. Clapper went to the FBI on 1/4/17 and asked FBI Director James Comey. Comey gave Clapper a copy of the Flynn Cuts which Clapper then took back to the White House to explain to Obama.
Obama’s White House counsel went bananas, because Clapper had just walked directly into the Oval Office with proof the Obama administration was monitoring the incoming National Security Advisor. Obama’s plausible deniability of the surveillance was lost as soon as Clapper walked in with the written transcript.
That was the motive for the 1/5/17 Susan Rice memo, and the reason for Obama to emphasize “by the book” three times.
It wasn’t that Obama didn’t know already; it was that a document trail now existed (likely a CYA from Comey) that took away Obama’s plausible deniability of knowledge. The entire January 5th meeting was organized to mitigate this issue.
Knowing the Flynn Cuts were created simultaneously with the phone call, and knowing how it was quickly decided to use the Logan Act as a narrative against Flynn and Trump, we can be very sure both McCord and Yates had read that transcript before they went to the White House. [Again, this is the entire purpose of them going to the White House to confront McGhan with their manufactured concerns.]
So, when it comes to ‘who leaked’ the reality of the Flynn/Kislyak call to the media, the entire predicate for the Logan Act violation – in hindsight – I would bet a donut it was Mary McCord.
But wait, there’s more….
Now we go back to McCord’s husband, Sheldon Snook.
Sheldon was working for the counsel to John Roberts. The counsel to the Chief Justice has one job – to review the legal implications of issues before the court and advise Justice John Roberts. The counsel to the Chief Justice knows everything happening in the court, and is the sounding board for any legal issues impacting the Supreme Court.
In his position as the right hand of the counsel to the chief justice, Sheldon Snook would know everything happening inside the court.
At the time, there was nothing bigger inside the court than the Alito opinion known as the Dobb’s Decision – the returning of abortion law to the states. Without any doubt, the counsel to Chief Justice Roberts would have that decision at the forefront of his advice and counsel. By extension, this puts the actual written Alito opinion in the orbit of Sheldon Snook.
After the Supreme Court launched a heavily publicized internal investigation into the leaking of the Dobbs decision (Alito opinion), something interesting happened. Sheldon Snook left his position. If you look at the timing of the leak, the investigation and the Sheldon Snook exit, the circumstantial evidence looms large.
Of course, given the extremely high stakes, the institutional crisis with the public discovering the office of the legal counsel to the Chief Justice likely leaked the decision, such an outcome would be catastrophic for the institutional credibility. In essence, it would be Robert’s office who leaked the opinion to the media.
If you were Chief Justice John Roberts, and desperately needed to protect the integrity of the court, making sure such a thermonuclear discovery was never identified would be paramount. Under the auspices of motive, Sheldon Snook would exit quietly. Which is exactly what happened.
The timeline holds the key.
BACK TO MARY in 2025 – During the question session for Attorney General Pam Bondi’s nomination, Adam Schiff asked Mary McCord about whether AG Bondi should recuse herself from investigating Adam Schiff and Mary McCord. It’s a little funny if you understand the background.
I prompted the video to the part at 01:36:14 when Schiff asks McCord, and Mrs. McCord responds with “yes, Pam Bondi should recuse.” WATCH:
Mary McCord says Pam Bondi must recuse herself from any investigative outcome related to the first impeachment effort.
Who was the lead staff working for Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler on the first impeachment effort?
Mary McCord.
Now, triggering that first impeachment effort… Who worked with ICIG Michael Atkinson to change the CIA whistleblower regulations permitting an anonymous complaint?
Yep, that would be the same Mary McCord.
In essence, the woman who organized, structured, led and coordinated the first impeachment effort, says Pam Bondi must recuse herself from investigating the organization, structure, leadership and coordination of the first impeachment effort.
If all that seems overwhelming, here’s a short recap:
♦ McCord submitted the fraudulent FISA application to spy on Trump campaign.
♦ McCord helped create the “Logan Act” claim used against Michael Flynn and then went with Sally Yates to confront the White House.
♦ McCord then left the DOJ and went to work for Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler on Impeachment Committee.
♦ McCord organized the CIA rule changes with Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson.
♦ McCord led and organized the impeachment effort, in the background, using the evidence she helped create.
♦ McCord joined the FISA Court to protect against DOJ IG Michael Horowitz newly gained NSD oversight and FISA review.
♦ McCord joined the J6 Committee helping to create all the lawfare angles they deployed.
♦ McCord then coordinated with DA Fani Willis in Georgia.
♦ McCord was working with Special Counsel Jack Smith to prosecute Trump.
♦ McCord is now coordinating outside Lawfare attacks against Donald Trump in term #2
♦ McCord also testified that AG Pam Bondi must recuse herself from investigating McCord.
♦ Joe Biden then pardoned Mary McCord.
Now, if you’re wondering why I spend so much time and attention on the Mary McCord issue, the information today about her sending the FBI information about the Oathkeepers chat group might clarify things.
When I look at that activity by Mary McCord, and I consider the duplicity of the FBI in conducting the Arctic Frost investigation, I also consider that I was personally targeted by the J6 team of McCord and the FBI.
It all tracks, and Mary McCord is in the very center of all of it.
So no, I am not letting it go.
Harriet Hageman is a WOLVERINE!!
Gotta love her
This smart, lovely lady needs to be considered for the next administration if not before!
She is running for the 2026 Wyoming Senate Seat (replacing the retiring Cynthia Lummis). Have entered prayers for her safety and health.
For AG, now!
Yeah. She would have been MUCH better than what’s his name, who’s currently in there.
I like that idea
Hang Mary McCord
TRAITOROUS BITCH
It is too cruel and ugly to say what I would like to happen to mary mccord and some others in these circles on this blog.
Well, she’s butt-ugly. Does that give her any grace in your eyes?🤣
Is it a she? I am really not sure about that…MM looks like a man.
re: “Well, she’s butt-ugly.”
Colorless, oderless, shaves her eyebrows … what’s not to like /sarc
True, so hot.
Has that ever been done to a woman? And I’m not implying tar and feathers.
I wonder how much loot the illustrious couple gained? Are we monitoring their phones as we speak?
So .. what’s to become of All.. These.. T R A I T O R $….. ???
I still think Mary is a man, not a woman.
https://imgs.search.brave.com/G961RBrx4BOizpQlhturIygaB38NyiQAGfMz5F_75qM/rs:fit:860:0:0:0/g:ce/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWcu/aWZuYXBwLmNvbS9p/bWFnZXMvMzhlNmZk/ZTQyZThhNWI4YjMy/MTZmNDAyNmZlYTRh/YzNiY2RjY2JmM2Y3/NTJmOTJlNmVmMjFk/NDk1OGZiYjkzMF8x/LmpwZw
Instead of a cruel deaths, PDJT should import some of the machines from https://dignitas.ch/en/
Then during the 250th anniversary they can be put to sleep humanely.
If she could be the subject of a snatch and grab, sprinted away to a quiet corner where some experts could question her, I bet it would pay off hugely.
If the Clowns In America worked for the USA that would be a good use of them.
Water-board it!
Hang HIM by his b@lls@ck !!!!
She is a rockstar.
I assume you mean Harriet Hageman.
Absolutely.
Her “are you guys wearing your pagers” quip to a bunch of leftists hecklers as she was walking out of a building in reference to the Mossad explosive terrorist pager operation a couple of years ago is legendary.
SHE IS EXTREMELY Quick Witted – GLAD She’s NOT my Wife !
( i’D HAVE to PICK UP My Game )
I love the way she stays with her points and asks the same question over and over without allowing him to waste her time with word salads.
Her 30 years of experience as a trial lawyer shows in her questioning.
“– GLAD She’s NOT my Wife !”
If she takes care of her husband like she takes care of her responsibilities in government, then your life would be pretty darn good. Staying at the top of your game is easy when you have the right wife right by your side.
TRUTH resolute
i Was Talking about Her CUTTING to HER OBJECTIVE
” Honey did You Buy what I SENT YOU to the Store For ?… i DIDN’T See It Dear…DID YOU LOOK ?…Um,… OK, You CAUGHT ME…I Was Distracted and Pricing Tools that were on SALE by the Front Door “
Looks like an autopen signature to me…. just sayin’
This morning’s “Wall Street Journal” – way above the fold!
Jan. 6 Prosecutor Smith: “I will not be intimidated”
The irony is big with this one.
Is he nervous? I hope so.
re: “Is he nervous?”
He was shaking like a leaf WHEN he read the Trump indictment announcement to the press some years back now (and didn’t take questions afterwards.) Everything about ‘not a real boy’ Jack Smith stinks.
Pepperridge Farms remembers.
I hope he has the underpants to prove it.
“Jan. 6 Prosecutor Smith: “I will not be intimidated”
See, there’s the thing. This is not about intimidating anyone. It is only about uncovering the truth. If he has something to hide that’s making him nervous, well, that’s all on him.
You said it!
It’s also an assumption on his part in that since intimidation is his MO, obviously it is the same MO for everyone else.
Is there any hard proof that Biden actually pardoned Mary McCord vs someone using the autopen to sign Biden’s signature without his knowledge?
I posted this on another thread, but it bares repeating:
Time is of the essence…
Marco Rubio has the opportunity to be the historic hero of our time… Given what he knows and has observed from the insides of this massive plot against our Constitution and duly elected President, Marco could easily blow the lid off of the pot that contains “The Big Ugly.”
Praying that he already has….. And if he hasn’t, it is time….
Marco, do the right thing for our country and you are President!👍👍🙏🙏
Could it be that Marco Rubio, who knows who is guilty of crimes against this country, is the ultimate deep state plant.
Playing his role to the limit as to receive so many accolades as a changed person who supports the President.
But is he just there to truly protect the deep state and their secrets. Until he turns on the bad actors he knows and tells all, I am very suspicious. He has done some good things and acted MAGA but the great actors can play any role.
I’ll change my opinion when he comes forth with things he knows that hurt this country and the names of people that should be prosecuted.
Rubio means “blonde” in Spanish. Marco is not blonde. Therefore, there is already something fraudulent about him. I hope that is the extent of it.
https://www.houseofnames.com/rubio-family-crest
“The distinguished Spanish surname Rubio is of nickname origin, having been derived from a personal or physical characteristic of the original bearer of this surname. In this instance Rubio comes from the Latin word “rubeus” which originally meant “red” and was used to refer to someone who had red hair.”
Agree with all you wrote… And it is in knowing that background that makes his historical opportunity even that more grand… the ultimate double-agent…. Putting his country, his president, and fellow countrymen first….above his own personal safety and position….
Do the right thing, Marco!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
People can turn their lives around when they realize they made a huge mistake. I hope for the best.
Marco what say you? Marco? Marco? Thought so.
Major double-edge sword on that one…occurred to me as well because he is young and has quite a few years ahead of him. He mentioned in an interview recently (think it college football) that he would love to be a commissioner of a sport. Could this be an off-ramp for him? Still think that if he spilled the beans, someone in the admin would have let this slip…there is no air-tight group especially with Wiles blabbing to Vanity Fair.
He has done some good things and acted MAGA but the great actors can play any role.
Yeah, like Mike Pence on election night 2016, with his family lined up beside him, so proud and happy to see Donald J. Trump win an historic victory, honored to serve as his Vice-President. I am embarrassed to admit, but he had me fooled. I did start to wonder about him when the Flynn thing happened though.
Never had a good feeling regarding “smarmy” Pence…..
I don’t have that “gut feeling” about Marco. He is exhibiting a passion that is hard to fake…
It would be my guess that his knowledge is now Trump’s.
This would bring him liberty from any blackmail being held over him, it there is any.
This would enable planning, prioritizing and correct people in other positions to best utilize the knowledge.
We are at the 1yr mark.
Enusuring the nation’s economy is paramount. Still an ongoing process to retrieve us from Biden’s brink, if it is still possible.
This knowledge will not be forgotten and will be used to best extent as possible….
You mean, like Severus Snape…………
And as usual nothing will happen to any of those traitors.
It appears the Mary McCord is the missing link.
And far uglier than the actual missing link.
May be an opening at the FBI soon if Pam continues to NOT hold people accountable. Trump may need to fire Bondi. Good time for Ms Harriet H to step in and clean house. We also need Flynn at the FBI. Kash is doing noting
Lets say Bondi and Patel get fired. That would initiate new nominations and senate approvals or temporary administrators until both are finalized. That would also trigger a new approach and fresh look at whatever has been happening at both agencies. What this means is that there will likely be little to no movement on all the past deep state plots, due to “a new look at the evidence after confirmations”.
If Bondi and Patel stay, we might see action but I doubt it.
Why? PDJT may not be interested in poking the hornets nest before midterms. A better America will sell much easier than trying to convince democrats and independents that putting past admin in jail is good for us. Yes, it is good for us, but not enough to maintain majorities in congress. I just don’t see it as a priority right now with all the other things going on.
After the midterms, if republicans hold majorities, Trump could confidently say America is greater than ever before and then take almost NO risk in going after corruption in the deep state. If he presses it and loses both houses, they will impeach and remove. Would anyone trade Comey or Brennan prison time for republican majorities and 2 more years of TRUMP? As disappointing as it would be to not see deep state behind bars, yes, I would trade for more unchained Trump. Keeping the democrats in the minority is paramount.
If the Senate would recess so Trump could place a true wolverine, Bondi “resigning” for “personal” reasons would be ideal.
But Thune is doing the same as McTurtle, so Trump could only get another ineffectual loser confirmed through the nomination process.
Of course both the DOJ & FBI are next to worthless under their current leadership. However, did this exposure by Smith of the ” destroyed ” that hasn’t been destroyed J6 committee evidence open an Executive Branch avenue to the not destroyed evidence?
Thanks Sundance for keeping the spotlight on and directed.
The DEM criminal gang can run rings around the Republicans, and the institutions have all been captured. They are running the clock down on the Trump administration, and they will be taking scalps once they are back in power.
If the POTUS cannot crush the gang with all the fraud that has been made public,so far we are doomed.
Was Mary McCord pardoned by Autopen?
Excerpt/quote from the article above:
♦ Joe Biden then pardoned Mary McCord.
First time that Alzheimers actually pardons someone.
Love her. You’re so right. She is the real deal. 🙏🙏🙏 maybe Trump will see this.
Time to cut the cord.
I see what you did there.
Sundance, You might want to add a note that the letter to you was a screw up and exposed to you that the feds were involved in creating a phony connection.
She would march straight to the Capital and demand the release of the Atkinson testimony if she were CIA director.
She’s actually in Congress and could raise the issue easier than from the CIA.
Ms. Hageman could (figuratively) apply a Vise Grip to Speaker Johnson’s family jewels and get him to release the Atkinsson transcript… on second thought, that probably wouldn’t work since Mikey is gonad – less.
DO NOT EVER LET IT GO SUNDANCE. Unless there is justice we have no country.
weasle words of the left….I can’t recall, I don’t remember…possibly, may have, could have…..there are more but these come to mind.
Rush did a musical ditty on Hillary and her “I can’t recall”…
God, I miss Rush.
If Rush used a name for her in a ‘musical ditty’, that doesn’t come to mind.
However, he DID have a favorite nickname for her:
HILDEBEAST.
It was the “My mind’s in a blender” song parody back when …
“My mind is Jello, Jello, Jello…”
Yeah. SPIT!!!
Every time he said, “as I sit here, I can’t recall”, I wanted to say, “Just stand up then. Maybe it would help.”
I love the way Harriet Hageman cuts through all the BS. Anyone else questioning this scumbag would get emotional, rant and rave, and and never get a straight answer about anything.
She’s like the stern math teacher in 7th grade you hate until you get out into the real world and realize how much better you can add, subtract, multiply, divide, and use simple comparitive algebra than your coworkers.
She reminds me of Sister Patricia Ann from my school days. Big, intimidating nun who never tolerated bullish*t.
RETIRED 6TH GRADE MATH TEACHER …I APPROVE YOUR MESSAGE!!!!!
Like a prosecutor.
Just as an aside, Roberts employing Snook is a big red flag.
But as I look at it, I suspect Roberts had Snook leak the Dobbs decision.
One and only one person was working as hard as he could to change the decision in order to keep the old law. Roberts.
And Roberts was failing big time. A little external pressure is the next way to try to get his way.
On 5-26-25, Dan Bongino had publicly promised to the American people that investigations were being reopened as to the discovery of cocaine at the Biden White House, the J6 bomber and the leaked Dobbs opinion at the Supreme Court.
To date, it has been deafeningly quiet on the latter two investigations (if they ever were in fact reopened).
Very disappointing that such matters continue to be covered up, particularly given the sophisticated investigative tools available to law enforcement authorities.
Bongino’s performance at the FBI fell far short of his rhetoric.
So, what about Speaker Mike Johnson?
Time to unseal.
Hopefully this is under PDJT’s timetable.
But….
I can’t forget previous Speaker Paul Ryan (who also was Romney’s running mate) visiting Johnson directly after Johnson’s being elected as Speaker of the House.
That is bothersome.
What are “zello” and “stop the steal” channel?
Something the Oathkeepers apparently used to communicate. You should also know that Sundance was being set up… the stuff was fabricated and he proved it, thus nothing further happened.
One must consider when faced with various issues during its time, the main question pondered by the First Continental Congress was the very simple: “What can we do about this?”
No doubt they were mightily frustrated much of the time.
I don’t understand why Johnson is so determined to keep this all hidden?
No spine.
The most obvious answer is that the Political Blackmail Industry ensnared him in something he wishes hidden and he does their bidding. Like 99% of Congress.
He doesn’t want to be expelled from the DC club.
Go, Sundance, GO!!! Don’t let it go!!!
Sundance continues to put sunlight to this corruption, and I’m hoping that Tulsi is reading this summation; and I sincerely hope that Sundance has security protection, because man-o-man the left will try anything to stop this disclosure.
Sundance dropping some big truth bombs lately. (old treepers already aware) Just maybe Tulsi is reading, if you get my Meaning…🤐
Tulsi appears to have vanished. Haven’t heard from her in quite a while or did I miss something?
Maybe this is indicative of something in the works?
(A little hopium.)
I love love love her! I specifically watched her yesterday and it was hilarious to clearly see the blood rising up Smiths neck to flush his face!
The way Rep Hagemon in a calm, firm voice presents her case is a MASTER CLASS!
Praying for her success in her Senate run!
And safety!
Our prayers are with you!
Sundance, the saddest part is that all of your brilliant work and analysis will only make it into some future historian’s segment on the history channel telling future viewers what really happened in the old days like when we hear some old tales about how Abraham Lincoln was really a racist. Anything to pollute and distort the truth.
It is overwhelming.
Nobody ever mentions her name, but she is everywhere, and under every rock.
Only Sundance has documented her influence.
Americans have been Snookered.
Just knew it would be an “McC’
Not to mention: we’ve been Sheldon Snookered, as well.
Thank you for that clear and concise breakdown, Sundance! I hope you won’t EVER let it go!
Blah blah blah. But keep spanking that monkey. Maybe one day youll get a president who cares about this stuff. This guy doesnt. He wanted to be back in power nd stride across the global stage like a colossus. Hes pretty impressive. Oh btw whydoesnt vance take care of this. Or is he not really interested either. Go vance!?
What is this gibberish?
I love Harriet Hageman. She is a no BS woman! I wish she had become the AG… but I guess CIA would have been a good place also.
As for Mary McCord (spit!), I hope she eventually will become front page news and full exposure of her perfidy occurs. I seriously doubt she will get what she really deserves…. a charge of SEDITION, because that never happens (remembering the IRS vs Tea Party scandal and Lois who quietly retired into obscurity).
Thank you for staying on top of this, Sundance! <3
I don’t think it’s too late to hire Harriet Hageman to the CIA.
Consider that POTUS has just created a new position within the DOJ that is designed specifically to deal with Fraud- because there is that much of it.
Couldn’t the same thing be said for over at the CIA?
How about creating a new position for Harriet Hageman to do her thing over there?
I think it’s a good idea to do this sort of thing given the scale of the mess we’re trying to get cleaned up and the amount of road blocks we face when working within the norms- lets create new positions as work arounds.
Well it is safe to say that the two of you won’t be exchanging Christmas cards anytime soon?
Mary McCord, the ultimate Karen.
Mary McCord did a podcast on Jan 12, 2021. Approx 01:30 minutes into the podcast, McCord states that she “knows” FBI had intelligence about the extremist because she and ‘her organization at Georgetown Law were sending FBI and law enforcement that type of information’.
She continued on to say … “Many of us were monitoring extremist communications and propaganda”…
https://www.kcrw.com/stories/mass-radicalization-right-wing-violence-usa
That’s future SENATOR Hageman!
https://www.hagemanforwyoming.com/home
Can’t wait to see her join the old boys club.
I have always maintained that the fact that Polly Pockets Johnson was “miraculously” elevated to SOH on a unanimous vote after weeks of infighting and his name never coming up, was because he had been “vetted” (i.e. they had sufficient dirt on him) and would do as he was told! Not sure exactly what they have on him but I suspect, just like Judas Pence, it is something that would definitely NOT be looked on favorably by his conservative Southern Baptist family, friends, and constituents!
Smith was dragged across the coals by another member of Congress too…
Smith was up to the Gills with being shamed in front of the whole country.
It is unlikely that Jack Smith feels any shame.
Normal humans would feel what he might be unable to experience and why he was used by others to do such dirty work.
This clip really makes it clear the whole thing was a ridiculously overbroad fishing expedition.
Every time I hear Harriet Hageman at work I’m reminded that she’s an experienced litigator.
If you were Chief Justice John Roberts, and desperately needed to protect the integrity of the court, making sure such a thermonuclear discovery was never identified would be paramount.
Well, yes in uniparty lalaland that makes sense. In the real world that sank the last bits of wreckage from the USS Supreme Court since there was already no perception of legitimacy to be saved before that leak.
I felt like I got took to the woodshed just watching that video.
What’s the differed between Jack Smith and Lavrentiy Beria ?
Not much.
Lavrentiy was better looking.
is jack smith … his real name ????
The issue of Mary McCord notwithstanding, and I do agree that Sundance should not let this go, I also wonder with regard to Sheldon Snook and the leak of Justice Alito’s SCOTUS decision. If Justice Alito has the same opinion as to the source of that leak, I wonder how this impacts his relationship with Justice Roberts
I am without words to describe the level of hatred and disgust for the participants of the entire sham impeachment, J6 and Jack Smith( who was likely stoned on pain meds when he was “appointed”)witch hunt.
Jan. 19th, 2025. Autopen pardon.
Questions did Biden have knowledge of and consent to the pardon. And was he mentally able to have knowledge and to consent. We all know the answer to this.
Pardons and autopen use should be taken to court. Strick laws rules and procedures for their use should be enacted. For god sake they do not even need a signature on a pardon. When you have a mentally ill idiot as president. Anyone in the White House with access can issue a pardon.
Hey, where are those pardon forms at? Askes Mary McCord!
“Speaker Mike Johnson has to transfer it from the legislative to the executive, and unfortunately it does not appear that Speaker Johnson wants to open that can-of-worms – at least, not willingly.”
I don’t understand what Mike Johnson is hiding or why?
Nearly everyone is complicit trying to preventing Trump from being elected, preventing him from governing effectively, preventing him from uncovering 2020 election fraud, preventing him from running for re-election, preventing him from living free of harassment or preventing him from living. Only his family, a few close friends and a few, very few GOP politicians are not complicit. Some are directly complicit, some are indirectly complicit and some are complicit by omission or just not speaking the truth.
Most of his cabinet was complicit
Most, probably 95% of the GOP / RNC was complicit across all levels of government
A majority of the high level leadership of the military and the military DOI was complicit. Remember Vindman wearing his uniform? Remember Milley?
All of the democrats, all the way down to the polling place officers, were complicit
All of the MSM was complicit
75% of the conservative media were complicit
ALL of the intelligence agencies were complicit
All of the Five Eyes intelligence agencies were complicit
All of the counterintelligence area of the FBI were complicit
The FISA court was complicit
50% of the judiciary is still complicit
Most of the major financial institutions were complicit
It’s hard to imagine a more resolute individual in the face of adversity than Donald J. Trump.
It’s equally hard to imagine all of congress assembled together and not finding 75% who have dirt or blood on their hands.
Extremely well outlined! And yet here we are grappling with some of the same BS as before…traitors inside and outside. We have serious issues in our country right now…most, IMHO, come from the judiciary.
It’s less now than before but still present. There are solid pockets of progress and but the toughest areas to penetrate are still there. Most of all, those that were actively or even passively complicit would prefer that no one ever finds out about it.