The European Union, France and Germany are furious at the U.S. State Department and Marco Rubio for issuing visa bans against European political figures who are involved in censorship under the guise of combating online hate and disinformation. Brussels said Wednesday it will “respond swiftly and decisively” against the “unjustified measures.”
The first EU political group to be targeted with the visa bans includes French former EU commissioner Thierry Breton, who was one of the architects of the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA). Also: Imran Ahmed, the British CEO of the U.S.-based Center for Countering Digital Hate, Anna-Lena von Hodenberg and Josephine Ballon of the German non-profit HateAid, and Clare Melford, co-founder of the Global Disinformation Index.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the first five people targeted with visa bans “have led organized efforts to coerce American platforms to censor, demonetize and suppress American viewpoints they oppose.”
STATE DEPT – Free speech is among the most cherished rights we enjoy as Americans. This right, legally enshrined in our constitution, has set us apart as a beacon of freedom around the world. Even as we take action to reject censorship at home, we see troubling instances of foreign governments and foreign officials picking up the slack. In some instances, foreign officials have taken flagrant censorship actions against U.S. tech companies and U.S. citizens and residents when they have no authority to do so.
Today, I am announcing a new visa restriction policy that will apply to foreign nationals who are responsible for censorship of protected expression in the United States. It is unacceptable for foreign officials to issue or threaten arrest warrants on U.S. citizens or U.S. residents for social media posts on American platforms while physically present on U.S. soil. It is similarly unacceptable for foreign officials to demand that American tech platforms adopt global content moderation policies or engage in censorship activity that reaches beyond their authority and into the United States. We will not tolerate encroachments upon American sovereignty, especially when such encroachments undermine the exercise of our fundamental right to free speech.
This visa restriction policy is pursuant to Section 212(a)(3)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which authorizes the Secretary of State to render inadmissible any alien whose entry into the Unites States “would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.” Certain family members may also be covered by these restrictions. (SOURCE)
PARIS, Dec 24 (Reuters) – The European Union, France and Germany condemned U.S. visa bans on five Europeans combating online hate and disinformation on Wednesday, after President Donald Trump’s administration took its latest swipe at long-standing allies across the Atlantic.
[…] In Brussels, Paris and Berlin, senior officials condemned the U.S. bans, and defended Europe’s right to legislate on how foreign companies operate locally.
A European Commission spokesperson said it “strongly condemns the U.S. decision”, adding: “Freedom of expression is a fundamental right in Europe and a shared core value with the United States across the democratic world.”
The spokesperson said the EU would seek answers from Washington but said it could “respond swiftly and decisively” against the “unjustified measures”.
French President Emmanuel Macron, who has been travelling across France to warn about the dangers that disinformation poses to democracy, said he had spoken with Breton and thanked him for his work.
“We will not give up, and we will protect Europe’s independence and the freedom of Europeans,” Macron said on X. (more)


This site communicates very economically with the photos of cold anger, suspicious cat, the clueless aristocrats, Mickey, and the fox amidst the hounds. They don’t seem to wear out.
For this post I would have had trouble choosing between the aristocrats and Mickey.
Thank you Santa Rubio!! This is a HAPPY CHRISTMAS indeed!!! HO HO HO! 🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁 Five of them. Outstanding!!!
😁😁😁😁😁
Great start. Now kick the ginger sock puppet out. (“Prince” Harry) He and his hag wife have been agitating for online censorship for a long time. He even said he thinks our 1st amendment is crazy. He is a snake in the grass and needs to GO!
I think you mean “Prince Markle…”
Whatever you name them, I don’t think the Windsor’s really want them two back.
Ha,Ha. iswydt……..
He is a dork and should be depoorted along with his whore spouse.
Hang on.Whores are very useful.
So happy you posted this. Feels great to know that others have been following what the Sussex’s have been up to since they got here. I wish more would have come out about his visa application. Did he lie or did he get a pass…
𝗦𝗲𝗰𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗼 𝗥𝘂𝗯𝗶𝗼 𝗜𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗲𝘀 𝗩𝗶𝘀𝗮 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝘀 𝗔𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁 𝗙𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗘𝗨 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗖𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗼𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽
We in Australia thank you for this Wonderful Christmas gift …
there are several (hundred) Australian names that IMO belong on that list!
Start with the PM and his “imported” regulator Julie Inman Grant, Australia’s top internet regulator, will be enforcing one of the strictest social media crackdowns in the world.
He could also include the current “Australian” ambassador to the USA, Kevin Rudd.
Ha Ha Ha! – yes – I forgot about Rudd!
I said the list was long! 😉
The interesting case of Mary Kostakidis showed up on my search engine.
Sadly Oz is filled with no hopers.
Oz is filled with many inventors, computer specialists, international actors, singers, top business people, medical inventors, playrights, movie directors and many other professions.
That’s rude and not true. The leaders are the destroyers of hope. One thing though the people are pretty tolerant except the real Aussies like Mel Gibson
Yes but only 34%(who voted FOR the labor party)The fix has been in for about 60 odd years.We have to change how we vote and get rid of the”GERRYMANDER”around our necks.ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES.
When will Trump ban Canadian Liberals?
There are items like the Online News Act and Online Harms Act that are Canadian government bids for mass censorship or control of US social media. Even recently I’ve seen Canadian politicians from Carney’s government on X calling for what can only be called open political censorship of opinions they don’t like. A number of Canadian journalists have called for government censorship of American social media platforms, including X.
Canada’s Online Streaming Act compels streaming companies from the US to provide for Black, racialized communities, diverse ethno cultural backgrounds, socio-economic statuses, abilities and disabilities, indigenous people, sexual orientations, gender identities and expressions, ages and to promote and recommend Canadian programming in both official languages and Indigenous languages. If the streaming services have annual revenues of $25 million or more they are required to contribute 5% of those revenues to designated funds. The Act allows for fines of up to $15 million. What you see here is Canada having enacted a fever dream of Justin Trudeau into law. Instead of actually developing Canadian movies and culture in Canada, a crazy law is enacted to force Americans to do it.
+++
I think this move was to stop the EU from issuing fines on US platforms. As they did to X. $165 million which President Trump said Elon was going to have to pay.
He should NEVER pay it. F them. Don’t change a thing. Ignore them. They are all short-timers and will be gone in less time than people realize.
Canada is gonna be shit out of luck when the U.S. their own individual trade plan. How do people tolerate the intolerable goofy stupid and arrogant leaders there. They think hugging the EU for protection will help them, they don’t understand. The EU could complain all day about Trump, but no one in DC are listening. I do feel sorry for the good people that have to live under these tyrants with no brains
A lot of Canadians I know support the Canadian federal government including a former US person who migrated to Canada and became a citizen of Canada. That guy stopped talking to me when I told him the media lies about pretty much everything.
Some Canadians I know also joined the Jerry Can brigade to support Canadian truckers.
Those rude and obnoxious Americans. How dare they!
Now start to expand the list. It’s fun to watch the Euro’s behave like the whiny biotches they are.
Right, like the 12/15/25 EU Council Decision to sanction a dozen individuals, who in most instances, were just speaking up against the groupthink theory that EU bears absolutely zero responsibility in the Ukraine war.
If that isn’t an oppression of free speech, what is?
Notice how regular Europeans are loving Trump and Rubio!
This is how regime change happens in public.
The CIA and global intelligence operate in the shadows, controlling elections, funding violence and ‘color revolutions..’ Trump is establishing direct US policy and it’s a treason trap for all CIA operatives and agents who would act against official US policy actions.
Does anyone think the conservative Catholic Hispanics in South and Central America are really voting for these tyrants? Or is it the CIA working with the drug trade to control these countries? Trump isn’t directing the CIA to stop what they are doing because he can’t officially know what they are doing. So what does he do? He does things openly which destroys what the CIA is doing in other countries. Also look at African countries as well. Same thing.
Now the global-Intel controlled EU is having the heat directed at them. Trump can not act military in the EU so he will act against their law makers by name and I suspect their aids and associates as well. EU lobbyists? ¡Afuera!
Trump is now going hard on Globalist Intel. He can only punish the members of global Intel who identify as CIA or FBI or US military Intel. The others will have to find a way to operate without US resources which will be pretty hard.
Top Countries Supporting Free Speech
1. Norway Norway consistently ranks #1 in global free speech and press freedom. It is the only country to receive a “good” rating across all five RSF indicators: pluralism, media independence, legal framework, transparency, and safety of journalists. Strong public support and robust legal protections ensure open discourse.
2. Denmark Denmark scores 95/100 in the Global Expression Report (GxR) and ranks among the top three in press freedom. Danes show high tolerance for controversial speech, though legal limits exist on hate speech and Holocaust denial.
3. Sweden Sweden ranks #4 in press freedom (RSF 2025) and shows strong public support for free expression. However, journalist safety has declined due to organized crime violence, marking a growing concern.
4. Estonia Estonia ranks #2 in the RSF Index, praised for digital freedom and transparent governance. It leads in e-governance, allowing citizens to engage freely onlin.
5. Netherlands The Netherlands ranks #3 in press freedom, with strong protections for media and public debate. However, rising political polarization has led to increased threats against journalists.
Declines in Democratic Nations
The more I read about Norway, the more I like it. Surprised that Estonia (a former USSR vassal) ranks so high, but maybe that’s from exuberant bounceback.
My maternal grandmother was born in Christiania (now Oslo) Norway.
So what? Do you get that into every lame conversation you have with someone. Stop it, it’s boring…
Wow. Merry Christmas, dude.
I’m not surprised about any former Soviet satellites supporting free speech. When you’ve had communists stepping on your neck for seven decades, you value these things as much as you value your life.
Estonia is good at everything. Considered to be an all online country – very high tech.
Denmark, lol. You don’t live in Europe.
Don’t know where you copied that nonsense from, but it is obviously quite outdated and/or very biased.
For starters – ALL EU countries are under the DSA and EU precepts (more on this one below quote).
Since Denmark at one time was Europe’s strongest free speech advocates, we’ll use them to show just how far ALL EU countries have fallen:
In 2008, the Council of the European Union adopted a framework decision aimed at combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia through criminal law. This includes the prohibition of “public incitement to violence or hatred directed against a group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to race, color, religion, descent, or national or ethnic origin.” The agreement was later expanded in 2016 with a code of conduct signed by, among others, Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter/X, YouTube, Instagram, and Snapchat. The code commits the companies to review the majority of reports of hate speech within 24 hours and to remove or limit access to such content.
Contrary to EU law – voicing ones opinion on a subject isn’t “hate speech.”
https://en.itu.dk/About-ITU/Press/News-from-ITU/2024/Social-media-platforms-fail-to-remove-illegal-hate-speech
“Blasphemy” laws – aka Sharia.
https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/updates/2016/02/somethings-rotten-denmark-criminalizing-blasphemy-hate-speech-law/
Recent surveys reveal a significant generational divide in support for free speech in the United States. While Americans of all ages still value free expression in principle, younger Americans (ages 18–34) show markedly less tolerance for controversial speech compared to older generations.
This shift marks a reversal from much of the 20th century, when young people were often at the forefront of free speech advocacy, such as during the 1960s free speech movement.
This trend is not just a minor fluctuation but represents a 28-percentage-point drop in key indicators over just a few years, raising concerns about the future of civil liberties in American society.
This should be taken with an admonition that NOT EVERY American aged 18-34 is intolerant of free speech, just as all “millennials” are most definitely NOT as politically ignorant as so many people assume. It’s too easy to can everybody in a demographic as being part of a mind hive or some such.
You can thank our public indoctrination schools for this.
“younger Americans (ages 18–34) show markedly less tolerance for controversial speech compared to older generations.”
Bet those “younger Americans” surveyed went to one indoctrinateU or another. It seems that currently one of the primary purposes of college is to further cement group think into their students. That’s part of why they were so terrified of the likes of Charlie Kirk.
Bravo Marco, this made my evening. If only Europe could remember what their own classical liberalism was about.
They’re not the only ones who need to remember.
“I may disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it” is frequently attributed to Voltaire, but it was actually written by English historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall (under her pseudonym S. G. Tallentyre) in her 1906 biography The Friends of Voltaire.
Hall used the phrase to summarize Voltaire’s attitude toward free speech, particularly in response to the burning of Claude-Adrien Helvétius’s controversial book De l’esprit. The sentiment remains a powerful expression of the defense of free expression, even for ideas one strongly opposes.
Oh so true.
Still boring.
Bullseye. Reminds me of a quote attributed to Einstein (though not 100% confirmed)… “Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.”
There are many people destined to reason badly; others not to reason at all; others to persecute those who reason..
– Voltaire
Yawn….You can put down your new “Famous Quotes of Famous People” now, we’re not impressed.
Stop it.
What a way to spend Christmas eve. Using your “free speech” for putdowns? Bless your heart!
YOU are mind numbingly boring.
What a fantastic way to shut down ‘their’ United Nations!
Europe is not Europe anymore It’s EUROPISTAN.
After a wonderful evening with progeny and grandkids gathered around, this is a wonderful thing to find in the stocking. More please Mr. SECSTATE. This particular one is a joy, and JD Vance must be thinking, “wait, you guys didn’t think I was serious?” during his previous lecture to them,
Now do Two Tier Keir.
“ “We will not give up, and we will protect Europe’s independence and the freedom of Europeans,” Macron said on X.”
X ought to close Macron’s account and the accounts of his entire administration immediately.
The EU leaders threatening the US are obviously stupid, the U.S. action will possibly incite a lot of protests in the China imitating countries in the EU. The EU Oligarchs obviously don’t understand how far Trump will go to defend and retain free speech. This plan has been in the making for quite some time. I’m so proud of our President and Admin
If we have to partition the internet itll be harsh but europe will definitely hear us then and X will just plain not be accessible from a european IP address bye
Let’s see how Macron preserves individual freedom while destroying it!
Well done, Marco!
This is the greatest thing I could have hoped for. Been wanting this to happen since Trump’s first term. Do it to the UK more!