I have been asked to recap some of my research into cited formats of what I believe to be criminal conduct, with specific statutes against them. This is the fourth.
DNI Tulsi Gabbard is not a lawyer. While I may be wrong, I find Tulsi Gabbard to be a patriot. Mrs. Gabbard is focused on providing evidence to the DOJ that essentially forces action. I support Tulsi Gabbard’s efforts.
If there is one corrupt DC player who has escaped scrutiny for her corrupt endeavors, it would be Mary McCord.
More than any other Lawfare operative within Main Justice, Mary McCord sits at the center of every table in the manufacturing of cases against Donald Trump. {GO DEEP} Mary McCord’s husband is Sheldon Snook; he was the right hand to the legal counsel of Chief Justice John Roberts.
When the Carter Page FISA application was originally assembled by the FBI and DOJ, there was initial hesitancy from within the DOJ National Security Division (DOJ-NSD) about submitting the application, because it did not have enough citations in evidence (the infamous ‘Woods File’). That’s why the Steele Dossier ultimately became important. It was the Steele Dossier that provided the push, the legal cover needed for the DOJ-NSD to submit the application for a Title-1 surveillance warrant against the campaign of Donald J. Trump.
When the application was finally assembled for submission to the FISA court, the head of the DOJ-NSD was John Carlin. Carlin quit working for the DOJ-NSD in late September 2016 just before the final application was submitted (October 21,2016). John Carlin was replaced by Deputy Asst. Attorney General, Mary McCord.
♦ When the FISA application was finally submitted (approved by Sally Yates and James Comey), it was Mary McCord who did the actual process of filing the application and gaining the Title-1 surveillance warrant.
A few months later, February 2017, with Donald Trump now in office as President, it was Mary McCord who went with Deputy AG Sally Yates to the White House to confront White House legal counsel Don McGahn over the Michael Flynn interview with FBI agents. The surveillance of Flynn’s calls was presumably done under the auspices and legal authority of the FISA application Mary McCord previously was in charge of submitting.
♦ At the time the Carter Page application was filed (October 21, 2016), Mary McCord’s chief legal counsel inside the office was a DOJ-NSD lawyer named Michael Atkinson. In his role as the legal counsel for the DOJ-NSD, it was Atkinson’s job to review and audit all FISA applications submitted from inside the DOJ. Essentially, Atkinson was the DOJ internal compliance officer in charge of making sure all FISA applications were correctly assembled and documented.
♦ When the anonymous CIA whistleblower complaint was filed against President Trump for the issues of the Ukraine call with President Zelensky, the Intelligence Community Inspector General had to change the rules for the complaint to allow an anonymous submission. Prior to this change, all intelligence whistleblowers had to put their name on the complaint. It was this 2019 IGIC who changed the rules. Who was the Intelligence Community Inspector General? Michael Atkinson.
When ICIG Michael Atkinson turned over the newly authorized anonymous whistleblower complaint to the joint House Intelligence and Judiciary Committee (Schiff and Nadler chairs), who did Michael Atkinson give the complaint to? Mary McCord.
Yes, after she left main justice, Mary McCord took the job of working for Chairman Jerry Nadler and Chairman Adam Schiff as the chief legal advisor inside the investigation that led to the construction of articles of impeachment. As a consequence, Mary McCord received the newly permitted anonymous whistleblower complaint from her old office colleague Michael Atkinson.
KEY: Michael Atkinson was forced to testify to the joint House impeachment committee about the CIA whistleblower rule change and the process he authorized and participated in as the Intelligence Community Inspector General. Adam Schiff sealed that deposition, and no one has ever discussed what Atkinson said when questioned.
House Speaker Mike Johnson can unseal that testimony, and Tulsi Gabbard can declassify his deposition.
Moving on…
♦ During his investigation of the Carter Page application, Inspector General Michael Horowitz discovered an intentional lie inside the Carter Page FISA application (directly related to the ‘Woods File’), which his team eventually tracked to FBI counterintelligence division lawyer, Kevin Clinesmith. Eventually Clinesmith was criminally charged with fabricating evidence (changed wording on an email) in order to intentionally falsify the underlying evidence in the FISA submission.
When John Durham took the Clinesmith indictment to court, the judge in the case was James Boasberg.
♦ In addition to being a DC criminal judge, James Boasberg is also a FISA court judge who signed-off on one of the renewals for the FISA application that was submitted using fraudulent evidence fabricated by Kevin Clinesmith. In essence, now the presiding judge over the FISA court, Boasberg was the FISC judge who was tricked by Clinesmith, and now the criminal court judge in charge of determining Clinesmith’s legal outcome. Judge Boasberg eventually sentenced Clinesmith to 6 months probation.
As an outcome of continued FISA application fraud and wrongdoing by the FBI, in their exploitation of searches of the NSA database, Presiding FISC Judge James Boasberg appointed an amici curiae advisor to the court who would monitor the DOJ-NSD submissions and ongoing FBI activities.
Who did James Boasberg select as a FISA court amicus? Mary McCord.
♦ SUMMARY: Mary McCord submitted the original false FISA application to the court using the demonstrably false Dossier. Mary McCord participated in the framing of Michael Flynn. Mary McCord worked with ICIG Michael Atkinson to create a fraudulent whistleblower complaint against President Trump; and Mary McCord used that manipulated complaint to assemble articles of impeachment on behalf of the joint House Intel and Judiciary Committee. Mary McCord then took up a defensive position inside the FISA court to protect the DOJ and FBI from sunlight upon all the aforementioned corrupt activity.
You can clearly see how Mary McCord would be a person of interest if anyone was going to start digging into corruption internally within the FBI, DOJ or DOJ-NSD.
What happened next….
November 3, 2021 – In Washington DC – “Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) and the House Jan. 6 Select Committee has tapped Mary McCord, who once ran the Justice Department’s National Security Division, for representation in its fight to obtain former President Donald Trump’s White House records. (read more)
Yes, that is correct. After seeding and guiding all of the Lawfare attacks against candidate Donald Trump, then President-Elect Donald Trump, then President Donald Trump, Mary McCord took up a key legal position inside the J6 committee to continue the Lawfare against President Trump after he left office.
But wait,…. Remember the stories of the J6 investigative staff going to work for Jack Smith on the investigation of Donald Trump, that included the raid on Mar-a-Lago? Well, Mary McCord was a member of that team [citation]; all indications are that her efforts continued as a quiet member of the Special Counsel team
That’s the context; now I want to go back a little.
First, when did Mary McCord become “amicus” to the FISA court? ANSWER: When the court (Boasberg) discovered IG Michael Horowitz was investigating the fraudulent FISA application. In essence, the FISA Court appointed the person who submitted the fraudulent filing, to advise on any ramifications from the fraudulent filing. See how that works?
Now, let’s go deeper….
When Mary McCord went to the White House with Sally Yates to talk to white house counsel Don McGhan about the Flynn call with Russian Ambassador Kislyak, and the subsequent CBS interview with VP Pence, where Pence’s denial of any wrongdoing took place, the background narrative in the attack against Flynn was the Logan Act.
The construct of the Logan Act narrative was pure Lawfare, and DAG Sally Yates with Acting NSD AAG Mary McCord were the architects.
Why was the DOJ National Security Division concerned with a conflict between what Pence said on CBS and what Flynn said about his conversations with Kislyak?
This is where a big mental reset is needed.
Flynn did nothing wrong. The incoming National Security Advisor can say anything he wants with the Russian ambassador, short of giving away classified details of any national security issue. In December of 2016, if Michael Flynn wanted to say Obama was an a**hole, and the Trump administration disagreed with everything he ever did, the incoming NSA was free to do so. There was simply nothing wrong with that conversation – regardless of content.
So, why were McCord and Yates so determined to make an issue in media and in confrontation with the White House?
Why did the DOJ-NSD even care? This is the part that people overlooked when the media narrative was driving the news cycle. People got too stuck in the weeds and didn’t ask the right questions.
Some entity, we discover later was the FBI counterintelligence division, was monitoring Flynn’s calls. They transcribed a copy of the call between Flynn and Kislyak, and that became known as the “Flynn Cuts” as described within internal documents, and later statements.
After the Flynn/Kislyak conversation was leaked to the media, Obama asked ODNI Clapper how that call got leaked. Clapper went to the FBI on 1/4/17 and asked FBI Director James Comey. Comey gave Clapper a copy of the Flynn Cuts which Clapper then took back to the White House to explain to Obama.
Obama’s White House counsel went bananas, because Clapper had just walked directly into the Oval Office with proof the Obama administration was monitoring the incoming National Security Advisor. Obama’s plausible deniability of the surveillance was lost as soon as Clapper walked in with the written transcript.
That was the motive for the 1/5/17 Susan Rice memo, and the reason for Obama to emphasize “buy the book” three times.
It wasn’t that Obama didn’t know already; it was that a document trail now existed (likely a CYA from Comey) that took away Obama’s plausible deniability of knowledge. The entire January 5th meeting was organized to mitigate this issue.
Knowing the Flynn Cuts were created simultaneously with the phone call, and knowing how it was quickly decided to use the Logan Act as a narrative against Flynn and Trump, we can be very sure both McCord and Yates had read that transcript before they went to the White House. [Again, this is the entire purpose of them going to the White House to confront McGhan with their manufactured concerns.]
So, when it comes to ‘who leaked’ the reality of the Flynn/Kislyak call to the media, the entire predicate for the Logan Act violation – in hindsight – I would bet a donut it was Mary McCord.
But wait, there’s more….
Now we go back to McCord’s husband, Sheldon Snook.
Sheldon was working for the counsel to John Roberts. The counsel to the Chief Justice has one job, to review the legal implications of issues before the court and advise Justice John Roberts. The counsel to the Chief Justice knows everything happening in the court and is the sounding board for any legal issues impacting the Supreme Court.
In his position as the right hand of the counsel to the chief justice, Sheldon Snook would know everything happening inside the court.
At the time, there was nothing bigger inside the court than the Alito opinion known as the Dobb’s Decision – the returning of abortion law to the states. Without any doubt, the counsel to Chief Justice Roberts would have that decision at the forefront of his advice and counsel. By extension, this puts the actual written Alito opinion in the orbit of Sheldon Snook.
After the Supreme Court launched a heavily publicized internal investigation into the leaking of the Dobbs decision (Alito opinion), something interesting happened. Sheldon Snook left his position. If you look at the timing of the leak, the investigation and the Sheldon Snook exit, the circumstantial evidence looms large.
Of course, given the extremely high stakes, the institutional crisis with the public discovering the office of the legal counsel to the Chief Justice likely leaked the decision, such an outcome would be catastrophic for the institutional credibility. In essence, it would be Robert’s office who leaked the opinion to the media.
If you were Chief Justice John Roberts and desperately needed to protect the integrity of the court, making sure such a thermonuclear discovery was never identified would be paramount. Under the auspices of motive, Sheldon Snook would exit quietly. Which is exactly what happened.
The timeline holds the key.
BACK TO MARY in 2025 – During the question session for Attorney General Pam Bondi’s nomination, Adam Schiff asked Mary McCord about whether AG Bondi should recuse herself from investigating Adam Schiff and Mary McCord. It’s a little funny if you understand the background.
I prompted the video to the part at 01:36:14 when Schiff asks McCord, and Mrs. McCord responds with “yes, Pam Bondi should recuse.” WATCH:
Mary McCord says Pam Bondi must recuse herself from any investigative outcome related to the first impeachment effort.
Who was the lead staff working for Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler on the first impeachment effort?
Mary McCord.
Now, triggering that first impeachment effort… Who worked with ICIG Michael Atkinson to change the CIA whistleblower regulations permitting an anonymous complaint?
Yep, that would be the same Mary McCord.
In essence, the woman who organized, structured, led and coordinated the first impeachment effort, says Pam Bondi must recuse herself from investigating the organization, structure, leadership and coordination of the first impeachment effort.
If all that seems overwhelming, here’s a short recap:
♦ McCord submitted the fraudulent FISA application to spy on Trump campaign.
♦ McCord helped create the “Logan Act” claim used against Michael Flynn and then went with Sally Yates to confront the White House.
♦ McCord then left the DOJ and went to work for Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler on Impeachment Committee.
♦ McCord organized the CIA rule changes with Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson.
♦ McCord led and organized the impeachment effort, in the background, using the evidence she helped create.
♦ McCord joined the FISA Court to protect against DOJ IG Michael Horowitz newly gained NSD oversight and FISA review.
♦ McCord joined the J6 Committee helping to create all the lawfare angles they deployed.
♦ McCord then coordinated with DA Fani Willis in Georgia.
♦ McCord was working with Special Counsel Jack Smith to prosecute Trump.
♦ McCord is now coordinating outside Lawfare attacks against Donald Trump in term #2
♦ McCord also testified that AG Pam Bondi must recuse herself from investigating McCord.
♦ Joe Biden then pardoned Mary McCord.
[Support CTH Research Here]
Yes, I’m looking at multiple distinct silos and pulling out the common denominator.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
I was just thinking the other why have some of the Deep State Players seem to get no mention. Almost like ghosts…
We will be looking for a long time coming. They hope we’ll forget. Eternal Vigilance y’all.
If Trump truly were trying to thwart Democracy and turn the US into a banana republic, she would cease to exist by now. Instead it is the Democrats who are the threat, and want the banana republic
Their projection of such things, is overwhelming, and very, very obvious.
They never say our Republic. They talk about Democracy, which we know, the US of A is not….
That is telling, on its own.
When uttered by them the word is like fingernails on a chalkboard.
Yes that phrase dates me and I’m proud that it does.
If PDJT wanted to wipe out the liberal scubags that assulted him. HE COULD. HE IS NOT A DICTAOR.
This might be the most informative post ever on CTH, including the Benghazi Brief, which was also excellent.
Thank you, Sundance.
Imagine the time and effort it would take to compose an all-time top 10.
I labor of love. I long labor.
John Roberts is protecting Mary McCord. He is compromised, and he needs to be legally exposed.
The rumors re John Roberts being owned by the deep state have been around for yrs. If those are true, he might be running scared of the Epstein BS. Of course, most of DC is criminally corrupt in some fashion, exposing any dirt on him now removes any control the deep state has over him
A big part of his compromise is the dubious legal circumstances surrounding the adoption of his children. That was leveraged against him for the Obamacare ruling that he flip-flopped on
Yes they were adopted from South America but were rumored to be Irish which would have been a crime. I wonder if a DNA test request would be honored by the family now that they are adults. Their acceptance would put to rest all calumny claims against their father.
Sickening
I find the compromised story of his daughters being adopted is a limited hangout, hes compromised about something that’s alot more sinister.
And that video of Obama rubbing sht. in his face…and he flipped the script on his Obama care …Roberts ,hes a chocolate mess
excellent observation. The known adoption thingy has puzzeled me as being irrelevant as a controlling blackmail secret. .
Mary McCord personifies the acronym P.O.S.
She has been on the list for a very long time now . just one more headstone I will piss on before I die
Here’s to you outliving her.
“You can clearly see how Mary McCord would be a person of interest…”
Is is possible that when Patel et al do not talk about McCord…it is not because they are afraid of her…but because they are about to indict her?
Hopium?
There ought always to be Hope.
Shes just not what one would call pretty. In fact she looks like a soulless evil hag. If the shoe fits etc
I see Mary McCord get mentioned plenty. The person I noticed is never mentioned is Valerie Jarrett. Valjar. Obamas left hand.
I always notice that too. She must have kept her trail very clean. I can’t believe no one’s picked up anything on her yet.
S(he) seems to be pretty flexible, moving from post to post to post with ease…
Perhaps s(he) also knows how to roll over and cooperate???
Oh My God! My lying eyes are right again!
I wonder???
James Walter McCord Jr. (January 26, 1924 – June 15, 2017)[2] was an American CIA officer, later head of security for President Richard Nixon‘s 1972 reelection campaign. He was involved as an electronics expert in the burglaries which precipitated the Watergate scandal.[3]
For a period of time, he was in charge of physical security at the Agency’s Langley headquarters.[10] L. Fletcher Prouty, a former colonel in the United States Air Force, claimed then-Director of Central Intelligence Allen Dulles introduced McCord to him as “my top man.”.[11]
wiki
No, she isn’t his daughter. We went through that before.
She may have a pardon, but that won’t stop a moving train, a bus, a plane, a truck full of concrete, lightning, a tornado, a shark, a nail gun, a lawn mower. a chain saw and of course Karma.
Chainsaw. I like that.
The cartels (and the Soviet GRU before them) send pretty effective messages with chainsaws.
If her pardon is indeed deemed to be legal, then she should be put under oath and asked all the questions that are raised pertaining to Sundance’s article. She can’t refuse to testify. She would have to tell the truth. If she lies, then you’ve got her.
This attack out be used a LOT in my opinion.
But can’t all the autopen pardon folks, if called to testify, just look with a blank stare and say, “I don’t remember…” ? Why would they necessarily have to tell all that they know?
Cue the segment Rush used to play of H. Clinton – I have no recollection, my brain is Jell-o
Don’t forget lawn darts…
Falling safes and pianos…
“If there is one corrupt DC player who has escaped scrutiny for her corrupt endeavors, it would be Mary McCord.”
If she does not receive prison time for her actions it will confirm what we have known all along, that it’s not just the players that are corrupt, it’s the whole of D.C’s federal employees.
Let’s suppose the pardon is rock solid. That doesn’t cover her for anything post-pardon.
Sunlight at high noon. Thank you Sundance.
Golly.
“If there is one corrupt DC player who has escaped scrutiny for her corrupt endeavors, it would be Mary McCord.”
Miss McCord
Is going to be in some really deep sh t
if Outline #4 ever sees the light of day!
Um …
WHO IS SD’s “counsel”?
[got a little job for you.]
Has John Carlin ever been subpoenaed to testify before Congress since his departure?
I wonder why he left? Before the filing?
Carlin was busy appearing on PBS, intimidating Judy Woodruff and panelists
on the right things to say regarding any and all Trump investigations.
The guy is an enforcer, as in “Nice house you have there, shame if anything
would happen to it”.
He also has eyes that better describe ” soulless” then anyone else I’ve witnessed
in decades.
The good news is that her pardon only provides her protection from her J6 activities & doesn’t protect her from any of her other nefarious actions.
That being said, I’m really not sure that it’s a valid & binding pardon. How do you prophylacticly pardon someone in advance of them being charged with a crime?
Legal expert.
Paging legal expert.
Question on McCord thread.
She’s the common thread. Seems tailor made for a RICO charge for her and every stop along the way adds to the conspiracy
In the meantime some serious, constant and very public shunning needs to be blasted Mary’s way.
Sundance has laid out all the evidence sufficient for probable cause and the arrest of Mary McCord, IMO, for seditious conspiracy, Treason, RICO, and a host of other crimes.
The conspiracy is ongoing so the statute of limitations are extended. Besides, there is no SOL for Treason.
Get the cuffs on her now, Dan Bongino, and Kash! The indictments can come later.
At the least, compel her testimony in Congress and get her on several perjury charges if she lies.
Mary McCord is one of the main people in this ongoing treasonous criminal conspiracy that needs examination under oath.
FYI: McCord is still going and is BRAZEN as hell about it as well. I guess she feels very safe in DC :
Listen to Main Justice with Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord
Main Justice is the next era of judicial watch from Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord, the veteran lawyers behind the hit podcast Prosecuting Donald Trump. As the criminal cases against Trump wind down and his new administration comes to power, Andrew and Mary draw on their extensive experience working within the Department of Justice to break down what’s happening inside Trump’s DOJ. Each week, they use their platform on Main Justice to safeguard against assaults on our laws, our Constitution, and our democracy.
https://www.msnbc.com/main-justice
(sigh)
MSNBC huh. Ah yes, the utmost pedigree when it comes to respect and honor.
these pardons are BS, most f’d up thing I’ve ever seen, the entire rat azz democrat party pardoned themselves!
Pardons are insurance against WTP not prosecution.
Mary McCord is President Snow?
Mr. Bennett said “What did he do?”
https://www.istockphoto.com/photo/spying-gm1188826694-336365995?searchscope=image%2Cfilm
Everywhere you look
There she is again
https://i.chzbgr.com/full/7484638976/hCC9BC6D2/i-like-what-i-see
Which is more of a man …
Mary, or
Jake Sullivan?
Woman who thinks her sh1t don’t stink!
Make up would help and a proper hair cut.
Do President Trump and the others working for him understand what is so incredibly well presented here (thank you) in a way any jury member should comprehend and remember. There absolutely has to be prosecution of these exceptionally evil people.
Public Enemy #1…
When the credits roll on the movie, ‘The Traitorous Mary McCord”, there will be a small but significant note just before the end that reads, “Special Thanks: Sundance and The Conservative Treehouse”
Ugh, she’s in a tie for which DC critter I dispise the most. Her or Obummer’s former Wingman. Truly devious demons. And she is a very very capable spook who abled her name onto the infamous autopen list.
Well, fortunately, the pardon is narrow. And in the process of the grand jury uncovering the facts, who knows what she might say that would be either a lie leading to a perjury charge or maybe she likes to cheat on her taxes just like she defrauded the country….
Also, the J6 select cmte closed up shop long before Jack Smith did…so let’s find out where she went next in the rolling coup d’etat…
Time to cut the cord
I have given my full “attention to this matter” and in conclusion…. THEY SHOULD ALL BE IN JAIL!!!!!!
Ecclesiastes 12:13-14
“Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter:
Fear God and keep His commandments,
For this is man’s all.
For God will bring every work into judgment, Including every secret thing,
Whether good or evil.”
Incestuous tight knit group of criminals with Department of Justice and Intelligence Inspector General and Supreme Court authority!
What could possibly go wrong?
what would be the rationale to avoid pointing this one out? what is her connection that lets her slip by?
Is that pardon one that was done with the auto pen?
Most all of them were, especially the last minute ones.
Somewhere a gallows is screaming for a tyrant.
And then the horse said, “No, I’m Mary McCord!”
Why the long face, Mary?
*whuffles*
Notice how quickly she answers Schiff’s question, as if she knows it’s coming and simply reciting a well-rehearsed reply.
Crime, for some in this life, actually does pay.
Makes me want to spit up.
I was just thinking terrible accidents need to befall these scumbags as a warning to the next generation waiting in the wings.
Mary McCord AKA Campaign Carl Cameron
The thread of McCord through out everything you would think would make her a hot target. Alas, I doubt it. I have zero faith in Bondi or Patel to carry this out. Nor the GOPe House or Senate. All toothless cowards. I do believe there are a few in the DOJ like Ed Martin who will be successful in some indictments/prosecutions. But the main focal characters in this crime scene for the last 10 years will not be touched.
Just my own gut take on things. I welcome being wrong.
Lisa Page was amicussing also…
What! I remember that Amy Jeffrey’s worked (I think) at the American Consulate in London the FBI rushed to England to talk about Papadopolos conversation with the Australian ambassador. The CIA station chief Gina Haspel told them to pound sand so the FBI had to ask Amy Jeffery to facilitate the meeting. Then later when Lisa Paige was either defending herself against criminal charges or suing for wages and benefits Amy Jeffrey became her lawyer for a while. I. Suspected this was to provide lawyer client confidentiality but seeing Amy Jeffrey as amicus Curia is even more shocking
As a retired prosecutor, I can see where Bosberg has traded whatever judicial immunity he had when he appointed McCord as the “amicus” monitor on the Clinesmith fiasco……..
Boasberg needs to be made Dylan Mulvaney famous in this endeavor!
I still say there is gold to be found in the John Roberts/Boasberg communications.
Sundance, does this set up AG Bondi to recuse herself as AG Sessions did in term #!?
I notice that Sundance signed off with “thank you for your attention to this matter.”
President Trump has done that a few times as well.
Can someone please explain the significance of?
Thanks
Just a sign off akin to:
“That is all” or “Nothing follows”
Sundance- Here are my Questions: Mary McCord received a Biden Autopen pardon for crimes she committed while employed as a STAFF member for the J6 Committee.
Can she be charged for the crimes she committed while employed by the US government in
MANY OTHER OCCUPATIONS over the years? Since McCord instigated and participated in many steps along the way while holding various government positions during the on going conspiracies against Trump, the statute of limitations for her crimes has NOT expired, correct? McCord was NOT pardoned for crimes she committed while employed in her other government jobs, ONLY pardoned for crimes she committed while working as a J6 Committee Staffer, correct?
The best thing I can say about this woman is : She’s ugly. To to bone ugly. I’ll leave it there.
Dig Mary Manly McCord information from the silos, and if I was a betting man, there will be another thread to pull by the name of Victoria Nuland.
These ugly liberal women think they are untouchables. And it all leads back to Hillary, Ugly the Great Clinton.
You have laid out the prosecutions outline to investigate that will bring down this whole house of cards. Please be safe Sundance. You are making these people mighty scared.
Obama-gate
Yes.
Time to make THAT change of name OFFICIAL.
Extraordinary post Sundance! I hope the people in DC reading this ……..
<“If you were Chief Justice John Roberts and desperately needed to protect the integrity of the court, making sure such a thermonuclear discovery was never identified would be paramount. Under the auspices of motive, Sheldon Snook would exit quietly.. Which is exactly what happened”>
Is it waaay to wild to wonder if Chief Justice John ‘I only call the balls and strikes” Roberts gets caught with his hand in the cookie jar—of not being transparent regarding the Dobbs leak? Would that mean resignation?
If so, might we be saying hello Chief Justice Clarence Thomas? (And one more appointee for DJT)
OH! PLEASE! GOD!
YES !!!
Biden’s FAKE Pardons
The “fake” Biden pardons are nothing more than a publicity stunt and effort to provide “blanket immunity” for political friends who committed crimes in the performance of their political offices. After a proper investigation into their actions, if evidence of crimes exists, these individuals are not immune from prosecution as a result of Biden’s fake pardons, because the President has no power to grant blanket immunity for political friends guilty of crimes, also known as “preemptive pardons.”
By legal definition and U.S. Law, a “pardon” pertains only to those who have already been charged with a crime. Pardon power does not apply to anyone who has not yet been charged, tried, convicted or sentenced for a crime.
If someone is not guilty, charged or convicted of any crime, they do not need, nor are they legally eligible for a pardon. No one can pardon someone for crimes they have never been charged with. On the other hand, if one attempts to provide “blanket immunity” via fake pardons, it is presumed that those recipients must be guilty of crimes which they could indeed be charged with and convicted for, at some future date, hence the purpose of the fake preemptive pardon attempt.
https://newswithviews.com/bidens-fake-pardons/
I hadn’t read your post yet when I said the same thing less eloquently. Before your charged or even up to your jury’s announcement you can be given immunity by the court or congress but thats not a power of the presidency. I may be wrong on this it wouldn’t be the first time
Unfortunately, I see no entity in Congress or conservative ‘lawfare’ that has even begun to challenge the legitimacy of a preemptive pardon.
The glacial pace of the Swamp to run out the clock.
Ed Martin, a pardon attorney, was giddy when asked about Jan 6th and the select committee, along with the auto pen investigation. Did smug Mary pardon herself? She knew, all involved knew, they placed themselves in a legal predicament. Trump wins. The pardons fly, Oprah like. We shall see.
If they opened up an investigation on MM then they also get the hop rule.
Now imagine who the “hop person” might be and what those emails, texts and calls might say?