It’s not the first part of the 46-page ruling [SEE HERE] by Judge James Boasberg, threatening to hold President Trump and Main Justice in criminal contempt of court, that presents the biggest problem; it’s the second part where Boasberg is threatening to appoint an independent Judicial Branch prosecutor against the DOJ and Trump that makes a constitutional crisis tilt toward a near civil war between the branches.
Outlining his determination that President Trump defied a court order, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg states, “the Court ultimately determines that the Government’s actions on that day demonstrate a willful disregard for its Order, sufficient for the Court to conclude that probable cause exists to find the Government in criminal contempt.”
As noted by Politico, within the ruling Boasberg goes on to say:
…”if the administration doesn’t rectify the issue, the judge said he may require administration officials to testify under oath so that he can identify the specific individuals responsible for violating his order. He would then request that those individuals be prosecuted.
The judge signaled he could appoint an outside lawyer to prosecute the contempt case if the Justice Department declines to do so.” (link)
I think we all know the very select group of “beach friend” people whom Boasberg would lean toward in appointing someone to prosecute Pam Bondi and DOJ officials representing President Trump.
High on the list of possible judicial branch appointments, who would be subject to review by the authority of Boasberg himself, would be his prior friendship with a previous appointee, Mary McCord. Or possibly Andrew Weissmann, Barry Berke, Norm Eisen, David Laufman or any other credentialed member of the Lawfare alliance.
The ruling somewhat reminds me of a prior situation where federal judge Andrew Hanen found the Obama DOJ also in contempt of a court order regarding the status of the “Dreamers” and the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) cases. {Background Here} However, unlike Boasberg, Hanen only demanded a DOJ corrective action plan.
Lawfare operatives in robes and out of robes are willing to create a constitutional crisis, because that’s how the Lawfare operatives operate when their grip on power is threatened.
You guys got this wrong. It’s time for Speaker Johnson to curtail funding of the District Court System and introduce legislation to revoke and eliminate their charter. The DC system was designed by Congress and Congress can shut them down.
Traitor Johnson defend the Constitution?
That’s a laugh, guvn’a!
They could repeal that Stacy Abrams money 2 billion that Chaka Khan is trying to get released. Could do it without a single dem vote. I hope Stacy Abrams eats herself to death.
But they won’t with a chance to burn Trump at the stake.
And then they should 3 hop boasburg, Amy Berman Jackson and Roberts.
Bet they talk to the same people 🤔
Actually, anyone in PDT’s orbit just needs to publicize the Epstein blackmail dirt the DC scum has on John Roberts and this lawfare BS will end really fast
The RINO’s in congress would never let that happen! Haven’t you been paying attention.
hmm…it literally only takes a leak…..so to speak.
Now that’s “getting a bigger missile in the air.” Unfortunately, Johnson is a charter member of the blackmailed uniparty.
Congress has just started another two week vacation. They are useless.
When Trump gets through exploiting the “jurisprudence” rollout he prepped for (no doubt more on deck) and God knows what else he’s sitting on, stuff will move forward
Mike Johnson is being derelict at this point.
The Judiciary has gone to war against the Executive and Congress sits on their asses and allows it to grow far worse by the day.
And what do all these friggan games cost us anyway?
Here is Elon and Trump working so hard to save us money while the Judiciary racks up the bills playing Lawfare.
Why is Mike Johnson allowing this to continue?
This illegal alien is entitled to nothing at all.
I’m very disgusted.. and pissed off to be honest.
The dysfunction of this government is so bad it feels like a national security threat.
I’m beginning to think the House and SCOTUS are playing the “chicken” game…who will veer, except it’s the opposite and no one will have to veer because the cars aren’t started.
How shameful that neither the judicial branch or legislative branch has any balls whatsoever.
We may get the dipshit Bondi to even agreeing with Boasberg and appointing a special prosecutor…this scenario seriously would not surprise me if it happened.
Exactly Jeanine.
This is just exactly what I mean that this dysfunction, this playing chicken as you say, this is so shockingly bad at this point that how on earth is this not a national security threat?
I do not consent to be governed by these nutcases.
I have zero confidence!!
At this point, if someone dropped a nuclear weapon on us and wiped out a corner of an entire state, I am not sure we’d even be allowed to attack in response for cripes sake.
A Judge would appear from across the country and say it’s illegal to do something about it.
This is how crazy it all is.
I mean how bad does it have to get?
Is it legal for him to appoint a prosecutor????!
Call Mike Flynn about that.
Excellent point about the Flynn case. The DOJ finally decided not prosecute Flynn after an independent review, but when they dropped the charges, Judge Emmett Sullivan refused to dismiss the case! Instead, Sullivan appointed an outside lawyer, John Gleeson, to argue against dismissal of the case. Gleeson is a former federal judge of the same ideological stripe as Judge Boasberg. So judge Sullivan became both the judge and the prosecutor.
Flynn appealed and a panel of the D.C. appellate reversed him, ordering him to dismiss the case. He wouldn’t, and the DC court of appeals eventually sent it back for a final decision, but Sullivan refused to dismiss the case and refused to render a final, appealable judgment. He simply was not going to allow Flynn to go free. Months passed,a and after the election was stolen, it became clear that Sullivant was waiting on a new administration that would reverse the DOJ’s decision to drop the charges, and a chance to prosecute Flynn, post-election. In response, Trump pardoned Flynn.
This was such outrageous behavior that Sullivan should have been impeached. But we have a worthless congress.
Investigate the judges for conspiracy and corruption. Go through thier phones. Thier computers. Thier bank accounts. Order them about. Hurt them. Make them suffer. That’s what they would do. They delight in doing it to others. Plus you’re going to find them coordinating with others.
What do these words mean, what is Justice Scalia and the majority of the Rehnquist Supreme Court saying in this Landmark Decision from 1992:
Justice SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court. From Section 18 of his ruling in the landmark case.
United States v. Williams (1992), https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/504/36
What does Justice Scalia mean when he talks about sleeping on our rights?
I see grand juries as unconstitutional. It serves as a way for the prosecutors to get their “witnesses’” testimony memorialized for studying later by said “witnesses.” Then later at the “jury trial” the prosecutor can read the indictment in front of the jury; thus, bolstering that the prosecutor has got a valid case. Yes, the prosecutor has the burden of proof of beyond a reasonable doubt to convict, but they come into the game frontloaded with a point.
When I read those words by the Late Great Justice Scalia, what I see this rogue Judge Boasberg as trying to do is launch another Robert Mueller-like case.. which, if you remember, was stunningly effective in shutting down Trump and tying his hands.
They want to do this again because it worked very well for them.
THIS is the way
Flynn will go down in history as the most famous example of Lawfare’s “the process is the punishment.”
After Trump.
President Trump should have chosen Sidney Powell as his AG…
Gleason is the same pencil necked weasel that used the testimony of Sammy Gravano, who committed 19 murders, including his brother in law, to bust John Gotti. Not defending Gotti, just mentioning the blatant corruption of the DOJ. Feigning honor and integrity…disgusting! I have more respect for Gotti than I do Gleason. At least Gotti pretended to be nothing else but a gangster.
I am quite sure that if he is doing it then no.
Even if he does … either before the SHIT SHOW begins … Trump Issues A Blanket Pardon … or after The Shit Show concludes … Trump Issues A Blanket Pardon. This is all about delay / intimidation / and playing mind games with Trump’s DOJ lawyers and / or WH Offcials.
I was wondering the same thing! Judicial branch has the power to obtain a prosecuted?
Yes. See my post in this thread. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 42(a)(2)
Boasberg cites Fed. R. Crim. P. 42(a)(2) The court must request that the contempt be prosecuted by an attorney for the government, unless the interest of justice requires the appointment of another attorney. If the government declines the request, the court must appoint another attorney to prosecute the contempt.
rules here: https://www.uscourts.gov/file/78324/download
Rules are made by the Judiciary https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/2071
I don’t see how a Branch may by it’s own rule acquire powers not delegated to it by the Constitution or assigned to it by the Legislature. The Legislature assigned rule making power to the Judiciary, but those rules can not assume powers not delegated. Prosecution is an Executive function.
IANAL
But how can they prove Contempt?
They’ve reported back to the court on the situation, Bukele has even been here, he’s the President of El Salvador and he’s stated clearly at a press briefing that he’s not releasing the prisoner !!
So we’re at the end of the line here, this is over, the top person in El Salvador has said NO, so what more can be done now?
So I don’t believe that they can prove that Trump is in contempt, there is nothing more that can be done.
This judge is just making a fool of himself out of personal hatred and bitterness toward Donald Trump.
But I am afraid Boasberg is planning to go the distance. He needs to be stopped pronto.
Supremes will step in before it get ‘too’ far, like gnome sad, he’s just a joke right now. is this guy ever on court tv
John Roberts is BroBoa’s bestie, supposedly. Don’t hold your breath.
I suppose it means something in DC when one gets to hold court at the cocktail party with the most corrupt.
I have read that Judge Robert’s top priority is to protect the credibility/reputation of the Supreme Court.
All of them are the same, their first goal is to protect their Institution.
So having said that, Judge Boasberg is making a damn fool of himself and by extension, the court.
I mean we all want Mike Johnson to step up and defund the whole steaming pile.. that is how badly the courts reputation and credibility has gone down the drain.
They’ve launched an attack upon the Executive branch to not allow us to have the full agenda we voted for, they have diminished the power of our votes.
So what does John Roberts think that Americans feel right now about these courts?
So it’s interesting that John Roberts has sat back and allowed this all to ride out to this degree..
I would bet that the supremes will not bother to do a darn thing about this.
No, our side sees him as corrupt.
Their side sees him as heroic.
Foolishness usually has a consequence.
There are no consequences.
I don’t even need the sound on to know what Mr. Breitbart was saying.
He was gone before I was paying attention. I should have been paying attention. 🥰
I wonder how the murdered him.
” . . . if the administration doesn’t rectify the issue, the judge said he may require administration officials to testify under oath so that he can identify the specific individuals responsible for violating his order. He would then request that those individuals be prosecuted.”
Apparently, “judge” Boasberg has never heard of the 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination. If you’re threatening someone with criminal prosecution, you cannot make them talk to you. So “judge” Boasberg cannot “require administration officials to testify under oath.”
.
Nor is he entitled to be privy to deliberations within the executive branch.
.
You’re right. Executive privilege also applies. No one should say anything to judge Boasberg or to anyone he appoints as prosecutor because he has no authority to appoint anyone.
The Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution says: “No person shall be … compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself….” Note it says nothing about “self-incrimination”. That’s what everyone has been taught to believe, with the intended result that when we read in the news that someone in court has cited the 5th, everyone automatically thinks he must be “guilty” of something. If the Founders had intended to prevent “self-incrimination”, they would have said so. Details matter.
Anyway, what’s the point of citing an “Amendment” to a document that’s no longer in force? It’s all a game. See my comment above.
Actually, Trump can just throw an executive privilege blanket over it, and direct DOJ to stop appearing in Biasberg’s courtroom.
Let him bang his gavel to a room full of Lawfare agents, and just ignore him.
I think we just shiv the guy by having Congress wipe out the DC circuit.
Ultimately, what is the court going to do if all they do is scream and issue endless orders? Eventually, people will just stop listening to them.
That’s the real danger – institutional collapse of the judiciary – because people will quickly and correctly determine that “justice” is not for American citizens. Only for criminals in the country illegally.
“ I think we just shiv the guy by having Congress wipe out the DC circuit.”
Agree, but who in Congress cares what we think?
We can overwhelm with phone calls, can’t hurt to try. Probably painful not to try.
None of our congress creatures’ testicles have descended yet; so there’s that.
True
Truly, I think the judiciary has already collapsed.
The plug has just not been pulled on the patient yet.
Preemptively pardon everyone involved. F’m
Preemptive pardons open a line of questioning to directly impugn PDJT. Since they can no longer claim “the 5” as no prosecution is possible.
It appears the Hillary response would be best. I don’t recall…/I don’t remember
“It appears the Hillary response would be best. I don’t recall…/I don’t remember”
Preemptive pardons? At this point, what difference does it make?
I will always disagree w/the notion that circumstances or others actions can waive my or anyone’s 5th Amendment right. It’s a right, no court, no law, no judge can pierce it w/out your consent and people who accept otherwise don’t understand the phrase ‘inalienable right’.
It’s the same for concealed carry, it’s my gun ergo, my property, protected by the 4trh Amendment and the 2nd Amendment, and it’s unlawful to require permit or fee to exercise one’s right. So, how do people square conceal carry permits as being legal when criminals don’t need them?
Grok: “In the USA, has a judge ever appointed a Special Prosecutor, and under what law did he or she do that?”
Response (in part, the part that counts):
“Federal Judge Limitations Post-1999: Since the Ethics in Government Act expired, federal judges lack statutory authority to appoint special prosecutors. Any claim that a single judge can appoint a special prosecutor today is incorrect, as the expired Act required a three-judge panel, not an individual judge.”
You can run the query yourself. The original 1978 Ethics in Government Act by Congress expired after the act was used against a Democrat President (Clinton), and both parties suddenly decided that it was a unconstitutional infringement on Executive Authority (i.e. my paraphrased conclusion).
Bottom line: Boasberg clearly has NO LEGAL AUTHORITY to appoint a Special Counsel. There is no Constitutional provision, nor Congressionally authorized law, allowing Federal Judges to appoint prosecutors, which are exclusively the prerogative and responsibility of the Executive branch, i.e. the President.
Someone in D.C. legal circles have to be laughing at Boasberg at this point. If USSC Chief Justice Roberts intended to allow the District courts to discredit themselves, allowing Boasberg to continue his charade of “law and order against a lawless President”, was the perfect way to do this.
In the end, USSC Chief Justice OWNS all of this chaos. He could have stopped it, by permitting certain cases to go forward, by supervising the D.C. Court which is under his direct authority (e.g. things like “random case distribution”? Yeah, that’s his). Now the GOP Congress needs to simply de-establish the entire D.C. District, and send it to middle America, like maybe Tennessee. There was a reason that D.C. was never made a state by the founders. It should never have had a court within it’s jurisdiction. It was an advanced model of the “lawfare court”.
In other words, it’s an empty threat.
This is a publicity stunt. Boasberg has no authority to appoint a special prosecutor, and Pam Bondi is not going to. So the publicity from this is all it was ever about.
Lawfare is essentially a “court of public opinion” operation as Sundance always tries to convey.
I live in TN so no thanks. Death Valley maybe, but not here. You seem to have something against Middle America. I hope not.
They don’t care. Mueller was appointed under an expired statute. Everyone just pretended. The statute also said it was only for criminal investigations. No crime was named. So a criminal investigation in search of a crime was initiated vs Trump and EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM PRETENDED ALONG. That’s where we are. Where we’ve been for a while now. Rules for thee.
Um we never thought E Jean Carrol would happen (happened 20+ years ago, we scoffed) or the Mara Largo accounting error (18 million)…we are taking this too lightly..they WILL turn this into an impeachment….this and the guy in El Salvador will become the new impeachment
Lol. If the House even says “Impea…” of President Trump, they would all be hanging by their toes by nightfall. Americans have had it with this BS!
Since when has the constitution mattered to Boasberg!
Citizens arrest!
Citizens arrest!
No security clearance for you Gomer.
I’ve got 5 bucks on me. 😂
Maybe it’s time for a DOJ “ongoing investigation” to lock up all the documentation and processes until further notice
Maybe, it’s time to have the FBI raid Boasberg’s and Robert’s homes at 4:00 AM
Think they might find them together?
Not one to beat around the bush, do a 4 a.m. FBI raid on him, cuff him and place him in prison with no charges or bail as was done to j6ers. Put him in solitary if the matter persists. Offer him a plea bargain in a year or two.
Do the same to McCord and the rest of the gang.
Michael Jay for Attorney General!!
YESSSSSSS!!!!!
Let’s say a judge issues an order, but then the Supreme Court steps in and rules that the judge never had the legal authority—no jurisdiction—to handle the case. That means the judge’s order was invalid from the start. It’s like a contract signed by someone without the right to sign it—it doesn’t count.
Now, imagine that same judge tries to charge someone with contempt for not following that invalid order. Then he goes further and appoints a special prosecutor to go after them. But here’s the issue: if the court never had jurisdiction, then the order has no legal force. Any actions that come from it—subpoenas, charges, appointments—are also invalid because the entire process lacked legal authority from the beginning.
So if that special prosecutor sends subpoenas to Trump or anyone in the executive branch, they can legally say: “This has no weight. It’s based on an order the Supreme Court already said never should’ve existed.” Those subpoenas are based entirely on a contempt charge tied to an order the highest court already ruled was issued without lawful authority.
So what does Trump do?
He treats those subpoenas like anyone would treat a letter demanding payment on a fake contract. He doesn’t acknowledge them—not out of defiance, but because there is no lawful obligation to respond. The process is void. He instructs his administration to reject the subpoenas and refuse cooperation, not as a political stunt, but as an act of constitutional integrity.
From there, the Department of Justice steps in. DOJ, acting under the President’s Article II authority, files a formal motion—not just to quash the subpoenas, but to challenge the legal basis of the special prosecutor’s appointment altogether. The argument is clear: a court cannot delegate prosecutorial power based on an order it had no right to issue. The prosecutor’s authority collapses the moment the court’s jurisdiction is stripped.
While the legal process unfolds, Trump addresses the public. He explains this is not about him. It’s about restoring the proper role of the courts. He reminds the country that judicial power must have limits, and no judge can invent new powers once the Supreme Court has rejected those limits. He puts it plainly: this isn’t justice—it’s a judge trying to use the legal process as punishment again.
Then Trump moves from defense to offense. He doesn’t just call out the judge—he calls out the system. He pledges to pursue judicial term limits, arguing that lifetime judicial authority with no accountability has allowed some judges to operate far beyond their constitutional role. And for good measure, he also calls for congressional term limits, pointing to the legislative branch’s failure to rein in this judicial overreach as proof of its complacency.
He frames it this way: if the courts won’t restrain themselves and Congress refuses to act, then the public must have a way to hold them both accountable. That starts with term limits—on the bench and in the Capitol. No institution in a constitutional republic should operate without checks, and no office should be immune from public consequence. If the people want real reform, he’ll deliver it—not to serve any one presidency, but to restore balance and preserve the republic’s structure.
This isn’t defiance of the law. It’s a defense of lawful government. A judge without jurisdiction is no different than a bureaucrat issuing commands without legal authority. Neither can compel action once the law has disarmed them.
That’s where the fight begins—not just over contempt, but over the role of power in a constitutional system. And when the checks and balances are being tested, that’s the ground Trump stands on—alone, if he must, but constitutionally firm.
Boasberg knew in advance that the matter was Habeas and needed to be filed in Texas because he told the Lawfare attorneys to correct the filing and resubmit it!
So, Boasberg was not only wrong to not dismiss the case but he knew he was wrong!
BEAUTIFUL!!!
If special prosecutions are needed it is to investigate the misuse of the FISA Court to surveil Trump’s campaign of which both Boasberg and Roberts were a party to.
Good. Let them. My recommendation to Trump: Tell Boasberg that the SC already determined that Boasberg lacked jurisdiction. And arrests will be made for aiding the enemy, per the Alien Enemies Act. And those arrests can include public officials.
Let him stew on that for a while.
MAGA
The chance that Bondi ever arrests anybody of significance is slim to none.
Trump knows that. And yet..there she is.
Something else afoot in this high stakes game.
I also think Roberts isn’t a player at a visceral level….more likely he was unwittingly snared. But, I concede, sure looks like he sits between a rock and hard place of his own making.
Patty Morin during the Press briefing today was simply amazing. At the very end no left wing propagandist dared to ask her questions. Some “journalists” did, however, tell her how very sorry they are for her pain. She says, “please just tell the truth, it’s about more than just politics or votes, it’s about National Security and protecting our children”.
Rachel Marin’s story is what these radical left propagandists, activists and this judge doesn’t understand or refuse to understand.. FJB and Mayorkas allowed 15+ Million unvetted illegals into this country. We have seen some of the most heinous crimes committed by these people. I mean one guy literally lit a woman on fire and watched her burn. We the People are scared and extremely angry! The vast majority of citizens, 80% want ALL of the illegals deported!
“because that’s how the Lawfare operatives operate when their grip on power is threatened.”
They should not even have the power to control any aspect of the Executive Branch’s foreign policy or immigration policies. The Supreme Court ruled that the President has plenary power to control the Executive Branch. Congress has allowed the beast of the black robes to become way more powerful than our Founders envisioned. They need to rein them back in somehow.
The press conference was not carried on CNN or MSNBC.
Of course Not. Ms. Morin’s message doesn’t fit their narrative.
And their narrative is evil.
There is precedence for pre-emptive pardons. Would the left want to litigate that?
The only problem with that is that when you accept a pardon you are admitting guilt.
Provide links that 1. He is an Israeli citizen and 2. This is aiding Israel, whether he is an Israeli citizen or not.
Folks,
This is a classic deep state attack. The deep state attacks Trump with unlawful judicial actions and deep state mouthpieces claim these attacks are orchestrated by Jews, Mossad, Israel, etc. This is called misdirection. The deep state needs the attack to hold on to power but the attack itself generates outrage at these lawfare (deep state) creeps.
The outrage is then deflected towards the Jews in a classic misdirection used by Hitler himself to explain the defeat of Germany in WW1 and by the Russian royalty to explain mass starvation of their peasants in the 1890’s.
Literally Hitler!
Yeah, right.
Project much?
Don’t give me that “deep state” crap.
Here’s my list of those who have conspired to overthrow the US Gov’t and you would defend them.
Reid Hoffman, Chuck Schumer, Diane Feinstein, Gerald Nadler, Norm Eisen, Rachael Maddow, Benjamin Wittes, Kevin Klinesmith, George Soros, Merrick Garland, Andrew Weissman, Zelensky, Mark Zuckerberg, Ruth Ginsberg, Marianne Williamson, Amy Totenberg, Daniel Goldman, Barry Berke, Adam Schiff, David Laufman, Judge James Boasberg, Michael Bloomberg, Abbe Lowell, Jonathan Pollard, Jena Griswold, Michael Bromwich, Amy Berman Jackson, Saul Alinsky, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Michael Sussmann, Marc Elias, Michael Cohen, Cass Sunstein, Joshua Steinglass, Sulzberger, Dana Bash, Bob Bauer, Anita Dunn, Ron Klain, Antony Blinken, Jamie Gangel, Keith Olbermann, Jamin Ben Raskin, Martha Raddatz, Laurence Tribe, Paul Rosenzweig, David Axelrod, The ACLU, Jared Shutz (Polis), Jen Rubin, Nan Aron, Dafna Yoran, Rob Reiner, Andrea Mitchell, Lyor Cohen, Judge Paul Engelmayer, Beryl Howell, Victoria Nuland, Bernie Sanders, Randi Weingarten, Phil Weiser, Jeffrey Goldberg, Richard M. Berman, Bill Kristol, Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, Bill Maher, Alexander Caedmon Karp, Adm. Shoshana Chatfield, Col. Susannah Meyers,
THANK YOU! I want to see how these lemmings spin this as random chance. Btw, I may have overlooked him, but I believe you left out one the biggest pieces of 💩, Norm Eissen. But we’re told to be nice, while they drag their junk across our faces. No thanks! I love my country too much and have self respect. Parasites!
Now list all the non-Jews who are attacking Trump.
List the Jews who are fighting on behalf of Trump and this country. Next, count the non-Jews.
There are three kinds of lies: lies, damn lies, and statistics
But, no statistics are given, just the same Jew hate talk that would warm the heart of Ernst Zundel.
It is telling how ‘the Jews’ are counted only as the enemy and those who are loyal to the Republic are forgotten and overlooked.
Here we are talking about the joos, joos and absolutely not the deep state. We are not talking about how the political elite, overwhelming white, rich, atheistic males, have chose this political direction in order to introduce and control the new world order.
You say the joos, the joos
I say the deep state, the deep state, the deep state, the deep statr who overwhelmingly recruited from Yale, Harvard, Princeton.
We need to keep our eye on the ball and not be distracted purposely introduced misdirection.
Denial and smears. Doesn’t work.
Ha! You got that right!
In no particular order.
Pretty sure he has 0 to do with Israel, in fact.
Time for an Address from the Oval Office.
he is going to get himself killed.
its nearly certain someone is going to whack him.
I am not condoning this…but it seems fairly obvious that there are many people other than President Trump and his administration that might have a less than desirable kind of anger toward this reprobate.
again, not advocating violence…but it’s very likely to happen.
people like boasTURD behave as if they are untouchable. that is a terrible mistake to ignore. I am thinking specifically about the hundreds of people (more?) that he convicted and sent to prison for what amount to simple trespass in many cases…a misdeameanor with a fine would have been the right way to deal with those “infractions”.
see, those people see the contrast more now than they every have. They see that boasTURD is advocating for CRIMINAL CARTEL TERRORISTS!
This one is easy to call. You just don’t make those kind of errors in judgement and throw entire weight into it and actually believe you are going to be untouched.
someone will reach out and touch him. just a matter of time.
God Bless America
God Bless America
No.
If it happens, it will be the Conspiracy itself that does it, to frame MAGA.
The smiley face of evil.
If you were to watch the Mainly Whores Media or tune into any “public” channel, you will not be told the administration’s side. It will be used to further the nonstop slander against our elected government. Because there is no downside for Boasberg, he serves up the next story line to the lying media. Now (where’s Bob?) you and I might not give them credibility, but the lying media is why, inexplicably, 10s of millions of people buy into TDS because they’ve been kept in the dark and fed nothing but bulls*t. Boasberg and the rest of the resistance cabal have yet to suffer any consequences for their behavior.
January 29, 1996 Judicial Reform
Republican Presidential Candidate Pat Buchanan spoke about the extraordinary power of the U.S. Supreme Court. He criticized the entire judiciary system for taking control of legal and moral issues from the majority of citizens. He claimed that was undemocratic because the people have no control of judges through elections, and thus all federal judges should have term limits. After his prepared remarks, he took questions from the audience
https://www.c-span.org/program/public-affairs-event/judicial-reform/54210
Capturing such a powerful splinter of government was a major coup for The Conspiracy.
Powerful returns for a little investment in Kompromat.
Time for an Address from the Oval Office. (2)
If only someone had documented Batsheet Boasberg’s prior FISC corruption, regarding the Title 1 surveillance warrant against one Carter Page, in the coup against Candidate/President Trump.
The information, besides being in detailed long form, could be summarized for the low info and IQ audience.
It could be disseminated among all conservative media in a MSM-like coordinated effort. It could be exploited for all the right reasons. The united Republican Party, armed with this damning information, could, at least in great part, cancel the effects of Lawfare and the MSM.
But alas, Sundance’s great research and analysis, goes to waste while the Trump Administration is hamstrung again.
A judicial Peter Principle example, to me.
Judge Bozoberg is more aptly suited for night traffic court than in his current position and pay grade.
Seems like Boasberg is actually challenging the Trump Administration to give him The Finger so he can really go to town. It feels like some kind of trap. Boasberg is disregarding the US Supreme Court’s Order if he was divested of jurisdiction.
A judge cannot order you to do something illegal. Ordering Pam Bondi or Trump to return all those criminal illegal alien gang members to our country would violate our immigration laws, making the judge a trafficker, much like a coyote on the border.
Somehow this guy needs to be put in his place. Perhaps the FBI needs to arrest him for obstruction of justice, violating our immigration laws, and abuse of authority/power/process. Arrest him at his home, put him in shackles like they did to Peter Navarro, and let him sit in the slammer like he did to multitudes of Jan 6ers.
The other thing: he doesn’t have authority to appoint a prosecutor. That isn’t his job or function. He could make a criminal referral but that is it.
They can do anything they want because THERE IS ZERO law and order within this administration .
Judge Bozoberg!
As for a “Constitutional crisis”, that happened already in 1861, when President Lincoln exceeded his Constitutional authority. He should have been impeached. Instead, We the People (and their elected representatives) went along with his plans. When the authors of the Constitution (see the Preamble) and owner of the Republic it established (Latin res publica = “people’s property”) decline to enforce it, IMO it has been rendered a dead letter, aka “just a piece of paper”.
Of course it’s been kept around – as a distraction and pacifier – but Lincoln’s reConstituted USA – which is not the Founders’ Republic – has been ruled by decree (“executive order”, which also doesn’t appear in the Constitution) for 164 years. Like the Roman Empire, the trappings of the Republic (e.g. the Senate) have been maintained, but they no longer function as they originally did. They just rubber-stamp the Emperor’s decrees.
If the Constitution were still in force (“the supreme Law of the Land”), at least 80% of .fedgov would not exist. Actually I’d like to see a “Constitutional crisis” to shine some light on this ridiculous pretense. None of our problems will ever get solved if we don’t start dealing in truth.
I see President Trump and his legal team exercising a strategy of compliance with the courts with a bit of interpretation freedoms. That said, impeachment would be narrated as “dictator”, ignoring the court, “dictator”, de-funding the court, “dictator”, and legally restricting jurisdiction, “DICTATOR”.
It seems to me that there must be a way to force this judge to stand before the SC or at least his boss Roberts, in public, which the SC nor Roberts would want to see. Make this issue a PITA for Roberts and the SC to deal with. Roberts can skate away with comments like “we’re too busy to deal with loose interpretations of jurisdiction and frivolous judgements by lower courts we have already instructed with our ruling on this matter.”
The trump admin should also file a counter-suit charging abuse of the legal system with a request for resolution of removing Boasberg as head judge, disciplinary action of fines and removal from DC court for bad behavior as a judge.
Find his crime like Fanni’s was found.
It wouldn’t surprise me if Boasberg ran all this past his BFF Chief Justice Roberts before issuing and Roberts reassured him with I got the votes!? If so there’s a record of it somewhere! But I’m very, very cynical!!! JMO
The Judge clearly thinks the Deep State is going to win this battle and has the upper hand. This is NOT the ruling of someone who thinks he’s going to lose. As a former pilot, the judge is the one “getting missiles in the air” causing the “enemy” to react to him. POTUS must get bigger missiles in the air to cause the judge to react to him. Until there are consequences for the judge’s actions, he will continue down this flight path.
Biasberg is not a difficult problem to solve. Subpoena him to testify before Congress. Hold him in contempt if he refuses to appear. Refer charges to the Justice Dept.
The purpose of the hearings? Determine if Judge Biasberg is working outside the courtroom with Lawfare operatives (subpoena them, too) to obstruct foreign affairs and anti-terrorism activities by the President.
The testimony would be valuable sunlight. And if he did appear, you use the testimony as pretext for legislation defunding and descoping the inferior courts.
That is not hard in a practical sense. Basically, Lawfare the judge.
The issue is Speaker Johnson doing nothing. A few well targeted subpoenas would do a lot of damage to the enemy.
This may be the best option available at the moment. I don’t believe for a second that this judge would make such threats or take such actions unless he had already been assured in advance that he would be protected regardless of the outcome. Who gave him those assurances? We need to know.
Impeachment alone would afford the opportunity to explore the extent of the Conspiracy and beyond.
If Midget Mike did his job and accepted strategic questioning direction from Sundance, this Schiessefest would be terminated quickly.
I’m sorry but this judge looks like something out of Rocky Horror Picture Show.
These judges are on quest – here’s another! She’s *odering* the funds be disbursed as earmarked for non-profits.
Judge Tanya Chutkan – TGP
A federal judge on Tuesday evening barred EPA Chief Lee Zeldin from clawing back billions from the Biden EPA’s slush fund.
US District Judge Tanya Chutkan, an Obama appointee, granted an injunction against the EPA and barred Lee Zeldin from clawing back the money currently being sheltered at Citibank for 8 different ‘green’ nonprofits.
Lee Zeldin previously clawed back the $20 billion in grants under the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) and Citibank agreed to freezing the funds earmarked for the eight nonprofits.
According to AP, the money was awarded to “Coalition for Green Capital, Climate United Fund, Power Forward Communities, Opportunity Finance Network, Inclusiv and the Justice Climate Fund.”
The AG and the entire DOJ MUST investigate this judge for his numerous conflicts of interests and then they need to charge him and the black robes with conspiracy and sedition. Take a look what these people are doing!! If this were reversed and Republicans had done this during FJB’s term I can guarantee you Merrick Garland and the entirety of the Executive Branch would have gone after them
Conservatives on the other hand sit on their hands and do NOTHING!! It is beyond frustrating.
“Democrat Rep. Laura Friedman Says the Quiet Part Out Loud — Admits House Democrats Meet “Every Single Week” with Far-Left AGs to Plot Lawfare Against Trump Agenda”
Excerpts:
Speaking to voters, Friedman bragged that House Democrats have established a so-called “litigation working group,” aka “shadow government,” comprised of approximately 75 sitting members of Congress who gather behind closed doors every week to craft legal strategies in conjunction with state AGs — the same AGs who have brought politically motivated lawsuits and investigations against Trump, his businesses, his allies, and his policies.
“Every single week, we have a litigation working group where a large group of us—and I’m talking maybe 75 members of the House—sit down with the AGs to talk about legal strategy,” said Friedman.
“This is all going on every single week behind the scenes. It is nonstop talk, nonstop introduction of bills and legislation, nonstop being on social media as much as we can without being throttled, without the crazy analytics, and doing all these things.”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/democrat-rep-laura-friedman-says-quiet-part-loud/
Wow…every single week…insurrection.
As it is in concert with the foreign directed Communist Conspiracy, it is, indeed, Seditious Insurrection.
Today is Wednesday. Thursday morning Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority leader John Thune’s local offices need to be overwhelmed with phone calls. This judge and all the other judges who are it seems trying to subvert and overturn the Executive Branch and the Office of President to bend to their will need to be bought to heel. If the shoe were on the other foot the democrats would have already removed the judges doing this to a Democrat President.
Is there any reason Blondi can’t impanel a grand jury to investigate Lawfare abuse of the judiciary?
Subpoenas! Subpoenas for everybody! Including the judges.
Make the courts trip over themselves to defend their obvious corruption.
Unnecessary
The ghost of Brian Terry got dis
Bring it on. Approval rating through the roof.
Judges are supposed to interpret the law, not enforce it. And they definitely don’t get to appoint their own prosecutors. That job belongs to the Executive Branch—the President and the DOJ. When a judge tries to take on both roles, it throws off the balance of power on which our Constitution was built.
In this case, the DOJ should push back and immediately appeal to a higher court to pause this overreach. At the same time, the President needs to use his office—or better yet, a national press conference—to explain what’s happening. He needs to show this is part of the judicial system is trying to take power that doesn’t belong to it.
Judges are not “kings.” They don’t get to override the people’s will or strip authority from a duly elected President and the Executive Branch. It’s time for a real lesson on the separation of powers—what each branch is supposed to do, and what they’re not.
And let’s be clear: this isn’t just about Trump. It’s about how our system works and how power is divided so no one becomes a tyrant, no matter what robe they wear. Lots more plays here, strategically and tactically.
Sometimes you need to send an unmistakeable message.
Somebody with photoshop skills should put this demons head on that black-robed demon in Brazil’s creepy demonic photo. Satan clearly spawned twins in this case…
This guy is a Communist plant pain in the a**.
Make an example of him like Democrats do with the Right…… does Hillary do requests?
There is a case to be made that the judges and Democrats are textbook Article section 3. President Trump has constitutionally named MS 13 and TDA terrorist organizations. They are enemies of the United States. By the judges and Democrats ad hearing to them, giving them aid they are according to The Constitution committing treason.
ARTICLE III SECTION 3
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort”
This idiot can huff and puff all day long, it means absolutely nothing. Karma will work it’s magic and he will be indicted just like Letitia James. Both are dangerous.
Hubris is all they have.
It’s very disturbing that we have an epidemic of sociopaths and pathological liars in high positions.
Toxic people can destroy friendships, families, and countries.
I’ll be judge, I’ll be Jury said Boasberg in Fury.
I’ll Try the whole case and condemn you ro death.
I will take jurisdiction
By any old fiction
If there’s no
prosecution,
Then I’ll make up my own!
Until I’m aborted
I will not be thwarted
I will make lawfare
On all such as you.
Below is my THREAD of Boasberg’s opinion of probable cause of contempt. Some global thoughts: There are two equally significant issues with Boasberg’s opinion. First, a frivolous order can be ignored, he admits. 1/
2/ When it is a private party, they may not be entitled to decide “frivolous” but when we are talking an equal branch of government, the standard must differ. And here there are three huge problems, where Boasberg’s order was frivolous.
3/ First, order injunctive relief for class action in this context is unheard of & frivolous. Second, there was no jurisdiction here for habeas & it was clear. And third, there was no subject matter jurisdiction under APA b/c Congress limited jurisdiction to when no other remedy.
4/ While Boasberg frames habeas as mere “venue” it isn’t. SCOTUS has framed as jurisdiction. BUT more than that, there was no subject matter jurisdiction under APA because Congress did not waive sovereign immunity under APA where another remedy existed.
5/ On merits of “willful” violation: The order barred “removal” only. Trump Administration read that literally to bar “removal” from U.S. only and they were already “removed” from U.S. when written order dropped AND case law is clear that written order controls.
6/ That Trump tried to “outrun” injunction and abide by plain meaning shows that Trump Administration was willfully trying to NOT violate order. Bottom line is Boasberg is pissed outran injunction. You can tell that from language throughout.
7/ That and Judge is pissed his daughter (and wife’s) leftist work has been raised. But Judge Boasberg brought this upon himself by allowing case to continue in wrong jurisdiction & under APA.
8/ Now, while I don’t shed any tears for tDa members, SCOTUS has now made clear what due process is required, which means that Trump Administration did deny some of them due process. BUT that does not justify contempt.
9/ And as I’ve said for weeks: Notwithstanding the flood of unconstitutional orders entered by Article III overstepping Article II, Trump Administration has obeyed those injunctions–to the letter. He should be applauded for doing so.
10/ Instead, Judge Boasberg seeks to hold Article II in contempt for obeying the letter of his injunction–an injunction later vacated. That deserves condemnation.
11/11 Said otherwise: Scores of Article III judges have entered unconstitutional orders restraining Article II. Article II has been forced to sit back and take it and has no “counter-punch” available. And now Article III wants to blindside the President for not taking a dive.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1912607897172779225.html
🧵Below is my THREAD of Boasberg’s opinion of probable cause of contempt. Some global thoughts: There are two equally significant issues with Boasberg’s opinion. First, a frivolous order can be ignored, he admits. 1/
Margot Cleveland
@ProfMJCleveland
🚨🚨🚨Trump Administration appeals court’s order in Garcia (El Salvadorian case).
Cont…
🚨🚨BOOM: Trump Administration files appeal of Boasberg’s order from earlier today.
Both appeals:
District of Maryland
District of Columbia
Margot Cleveland:
🧵Below is my THREAD of Boasberg’s opinion of probable cause of contempt. Some global thoughts: There are two equally significant issues with Boasberg’s opinion. First, a frivolous order can be ignored, he admits. 1/
Cont…
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1912607897172779225.html
If this lawless and corrupt judge does the things he imagines, then the following reality check shall be evident:
Prosecutors are always part of and under the Executive Branch, aka the President.
The President can curtail the US Marshal court protections because the USM works for the President.
Congress can defund each and any court it so chooses to do so.
The President can pardon anyone the fake judge decides to hold in contempt.