President Donald Trump through the Acting Solicitor General has filed an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court seeking intervention and relief from lower court rulings blocking deportation efforts against criminal aliens. [pdf Filing Here]
The DOJ is arguing that lower court judge James Boasberg is unconstitutionally intruded on the president’s national security powers by barring Trump from using the two-century-old Alien Enemies Act to swiftly deport Venezuelans the administration says are members of Tren de Aragua.
“Only this Court can stop rule-by-TRO from further upending the separation of powers—the sooner, the better. Here, the district court’s orders have rebuffed the President’s judgments as to how to protect the Nation against foreign terrorist organizations and risk debilitating effects for delicate foreign negotiations.
More broadly, rule-by-TRO has become so commonplace among district courts that the Executive Branch’s basic functions are in peril. In the two months since Inauguration Day, district courts have issued more than 40 injunctions or TROs against the Executive Branch.
Whereas ‘district courts issued 14 universal injunctions against the federal government through the first three years of President Biden’s term,’ they issued ’15 universal injunctions (or temporary restraining orders) against the current Administration in February 2025 alone.'”
This puts the issue squarely in the hands of the Supreme Court.
WASHINGTON DC – […] Earlier this week, a divided panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals allowed Boasberg’s order to remain in place, leading to Trump’s emergency appeal at the Supreme Court. The panel splintered, with one judge raising concerns about due process, another suggesting Trump had misused the 1798 law by claiming Tren de Aragua had mounted an “invasion” against the United States, and a third siding with the administration, arguing that the deportees should have filed their claims in Texas rather than Washington. (more)
This is a major inflection point. Let’s see what happens.
This should be a 9-0 decision.
Should be, but I’m wagering a 7-2 in favor of POTUS.
Asking a compromised SCOTUS to stop Judicial Overreach is ridiculous.
There is some game at play here that I can put my finger on. Something is going to be triggered
yep. i think roberts is up against it. mary mccord’s fise role, her husband’s connection, the obvious last stand of the deep state. i love it. trump also releasing crossfire hurricane. you are right. something is going to snap. and it ain’t trump.
I hope what is happening is the Trump Team have informed Roberts in no uncertain terms that he may finish out his pathetic tenure if he plays ball NOW by restraining and universally halting all these frivolous BS TRO’s.
Roberts is most certainly on the EPSTEIN list as a gay repeat player. This is his weakness.
I imagine. A friend told me.
But……Trump must follow the precidents, and procedures provided by the so called law….at least at this point still….for optics. How many do you really think are ready for what he will probably have to do? He is going to have to declare war……maybe an Insurrection……and beyond what Wayne Allyn Root has suggested….only against the terrorists, the cartels and traffickers…..countries that back and push that including drug kingpins……..
But….the truth is….this government, some of if not all of its agencies are in fact involved and protect the same rot! And the evidence is shown by this extremist, terrorist protecting treasonous judge Boasberg……
The enemy is and has always has been within! The real insurrection was not J6….but the election fraud and rigging…..and everything that has occurred since by the enemy. The plandemic was part of their coup, the spying on a sitting President by a treasonous, non American born President who began the weaponization of government against us in an extremely stepped up way!
We were attacked…..and the embedded enemy is doing everything it can to stop us….Trump and MAGA…..and his team from saving America and giving the power back to the people.
The Insurrection Act may need to be signed and implemented…..and enforced by the military! How many in this country are ready for that? And what comes after?
This is why…..even the ignorant democrats must wake up to what is happening….the more people who know and understand what is happening….and what is coming…..the easier it will be for the Administration to do what must be done.
Waiting….and hoping for Congress to do anything is a fricking joke! Most of them are part of of the ruse to make normies think and believe…..they will do something! History has shown us….they are part of the very system we are up against! They are there to protect it and the staus quo! They all know they have great corruot media positions Waiting for them or great book deals that will pay them well for services to the state rendered in the name of protecting the club!
NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT IS COMING!
re.10, 11 & 12:
YES !
MANY !!
“MT’s”, obviously !!!
why is this ignored ?? WHY doesnt the AG and the Supreme Court know this?
@WallStreetApes
Federal Activist Judge James Boasberg is as corrupt as they come
– Judge James Boasberg’s wife Elizabeth Leslie Manson (didn’t take his last name) has taken $50 million from taxpayers
– $5 million was sent overseas to the Philippines
– Taxpayers pay her NGO $15 million per year
– $1.3 million in paycheck loans
– She received $801 K employer retention credit (mislabeled from PPP program) (PPP and ERC loans they were not entitled to)
https://x.com/i/status/1906314752126759081
When do people go to prison?
This was LONG planned as THE way to stop a boat rocker POTUS.
Rogers was an unknown nominated by CIA daddy’s son Bush even though the Rep half of the UniParty had a decent majority at the time and Barrett was a PC (female) choice Trump v1.0 was fooled into nominating. BOTH were warned about by people who investigated them.
Next, the District Courts were loaded with leftists.
Slap on the wrist impeachments from CONgress without impossible removals, impossible due to the 2/3 vote required from the Senate, or any CONgressional bills suggested by grandstanding posers which will never pass because just under 50% of CONgress LOVES the district court obstruction and many more if we include the RINOs, will not do the job.
So, FORGET CONGRESS!
As actually stated in the appeal, it MUST be SCOTUS.
And if they don’t rule correctly, the remaining republic is GONE. Stick a fork in it. It will effectively be rule by unelected, leftist district judges.
If the PDJT45 nominees lived up to the conservative credentials we were fed about them, this would be a slam-dunk. Instead, I’m worried the appeal fails to get at least 5 justices.
If this appeal fails, they might as well send Biden’s autopen to Boasberg, because he’ll issue 100 TRO’s a day. Talk about a coup!
If the SC lets Boasberg get away with this the Country is DEAD. Might as well have an open Civil War and destroy these COMMUNISTS FOREVER.
I’m for it! Eventually, they will have to be destroyed. It’s not an option to coexist with these demons.
***k ‘em. We’ve jumped through our a-holes to try and do things the Right Way. I wonder if they think UN Troops or the ChiComs will save them.
NOW you’re gettin it
I have a feeling that it might have to come to that, but I hope and pray that it doesn’t.
yes, this should tell us just how very bad Robert’s has sold out the Constitution…
No worries Sharon.
Only the Liar {Satan} can sell what he has no authority to sell…
Roberts, and others sold their souls…
Only One way out of that…
The Truth has no agenda.
In God We Trust
Trust God
Fear not
Roberts’ is open for business. Backdoor only.
Should the appeal fail, Trump should call a Joint Session of Congress. There, Trump should state in no uncertain terms that he will DEFY this judges orders. Thus stated, Trump should tell Congress that they have but two choices; Congress could Impeach Trump, or Congress should Impeach this judge.
One way or another, the precedent will be set for ALL future Presidents.
The DC Federal Circuit Court needs to be defunded and disbanded. Congress has the power to do that. Federal cases can still be heard in other Federal Courts throughout the land.
No funding for any of these courts where a communist judge has “held forth”
The new budget needs ti care a big stinky $0.00 for all of these located districts.
If the Dems want to shut down the govt, let them.
I personally would enjoy that moment of clarity.
Your day to day life would be completely unaffected. Imagine.
Yep. I can’t believe that the two judges we rely on the most are justices Alito and Thomas, both appointed by H.W. Bush and passed through a Democrat senate! And the ones to worry about are justices appointed by Bush and Trump-1st term and passed through a GOP senate! Unbelievable.
The GOOD LORD does indeed work in mysterioous ways !
PRAISE GOD & pass the ammunition !!
God Bless Team VSGDDJT, AND GOD BLESS AMERICA !!!
https://x.com/i/status/1906314752126759081
Federal Activist Judge James Boasberg is as corrupt as they come
– Judge James Boasberg’s wife Elizabeth Leslie Manson (didn’t take his last name) has taken $50 million from taxpayers
– $5 million was sent overseas to the Philippines
– Taxpayers pay her NGO $15 million per year
– $1.3 million in paycheck loans
– She received $801 employer retention credit (mislabeled from PPP program) (PPP and ERC loans they were not entitled to)
When do people go to prison?
As I understand the controversy, at best, Boasburg and his cronies are arguing that each individual to be, or already having been deported, should be given due process rights despite a lack of agreement among scholars as to what exactly constitutes due process. Furthermore he questions the law authorizing the deportations since it is so old despite the Constitution being even older. But, of course, these given reasons are not the real reason which is to block PDJT at every turn. Lost in this drama is the fact that as each day of this controversy plays out more Americans and illegals being exploited by TDA are put at risk with life ending violence. Trump understands this and cares. The Judiciary, from Boasburg to Roberts, don’t.
.
At BEST, isolated individuals (not a “class”) who can make a credible initial showing that they, individually, are not subject to the AEA, should be able to file for habeous, e.g. mistaken identity, American citizen. (At this point, if they’re in El Salvador, the jurisdiction likely is open.) “Everyone” is not entitled automatically to a time- and resource-consuming and wasting hearing.
.
Decades ago ( the 50s and 60s) when I was a kid growing up in Arizona right next to the Mexican border things were a bit different when it came to what rights illegal border jumpers had and what they did not have.
If an illegal was caught within two weeks of illegally entering the US or within 100 miles of the border they were automatically deported by our Border Patrol agents.
No court no nothing.
Over the many years since then illegals have been given rights that they never enjoyed before through the lawfare crap that the whackjob liberls love so much.
A huge legal industry of “Immigration Lawyers” evolved into pretty much an illegal invasion support group.
Massive amounts of lawsuit after lawsuit was unleashed on our court system and have morphed into giving illegal criminals unconstitutional rights.
At times it seems as if they have more rights than the hard working citizens of our once beautiful country.
Well said 💯
Lots of money and political capital being spent on “the browning of America”.
.
Habeas corpus, sorry. Getting old and brainfarting from too much typing.
.
If Obama/Biden had not FLOODED the border they could have all the due process they want, but because of a southern hemisphere invasion, Trump’s interpretation of the law applies. Funny how no judges stepped in to stop the illegal invasion.
That one.
Lets face it, the Act was passed into law, back when we actually required Congress to vote to declare we were at War.
In fact, at a time when it was just undersymtood as a given, that IF a country was goung to go to War with another, they had the “common courtesy” to openly declare their intentions…
Recall how England declared war on Germany; a letter was hand delivered, stating if they did not hear otherwise from germany, by a date and time specific, a state of war would, .blah blah.
Now, first off countries DON’T always declare their intentions, Congress doesn’t vote to declare war, and their are “terrorist organisations” which may or may not be associated with a country or government, and shadow organisations of “intel agencies” attempting to start “color revolutions” to overthrow existing Governments, which seems like an act of War to me.
So, yes PDJT is using an act, written in a different time and era, applying it in a way nor previously envisioned.
Is this criminal gang a terrorist organisation?
He has designated it as such, so yes legally it is.
Is it working at the behest of the Venezuelan Govt.?
He says it is.
Are we at War with Venezula? Not a declared war, but irrelevent since the act has the key word “or”. after war and just before invasion or incursion.
Was it an invasion or incursion, if it was orchestrated BY the last administrstion, INVITING them in?
Ultimately, does the Constitution and law vest in the POTUS the sole discretion to detirmine who are a such threat to the country as to merit immediate expulsion, either those who entered illegally, or on a VISA, and do those people have any right to due process?
I don’t know, and I haven’t a guess how SCOTUS will rule.
Isn’t the key question in which branch the Constitution vests the determination of whether an invasion has occurred, as a factual matter?
Declaring an invasion would seem to me to be a Commander in Chief’s role.
To the extent the declaration of the existence of an invasion would be solely vested in the President, and thus a core Article II power, then that decision / declaration would not be subject to judicial review.
I think that is the correct outcome.
For historical precedent, we might have to look back in history to 1812, when Canada and the Brits joined up to invade the US.
I don’t think we have been invaded since then?
If a foreign government opens its prisons of violent criminals and intentionally sends them to cross into the USA to wreak mayhem on its citizenry does that constitute an invasion? Does the president have the authority to expel the invaders to safeguard American citizens? I would say YES.
Excellent – and succinct! I could see that – and pray it will be – in the decision!
.
Consider how mild the AEA actually is. Restraint, removal, etc. Libs keep intimating that it has to be or look like what we typically think of as “war”. But if there were a mass invasion of uniformed soldiers, we would just shoot them.
.
There is and has been for centuries, stealth invasion, no matter how prolonged. Trump is right.
Common sense.
The fly in the ointment is FJB and the open invitation he issued to the world. The crazy liberals began the war last night with their violence and rioting. They can be counted on to destroy because that’s all they ever do.
The invasion was done through the tactic of INFILTRATION of the gang members and cartel employees with the ordinary illegal immigrants. The gangs and cartels are now Terrorists after being so designated under the USA PATRIOT Act.
(1). Terrorists are violent and dangerous.
(2). They executed an invasion through infiltration.
(3). The terrorists are both violent and invaders for the purposes of the Alien Enemies Act.
I would consider the Mexican cartels actions an invasion and an undeclared war that’s been going on for decades. We’re the ones that haven’t taken it seriously.
Considering the number of Chinese that have crossed the southern border, that too can be considered an invasion.
We should formally declare war on the drug cartels and on all people foreign and domestic who invade our borders or aid and abet those who do so.
.
This one is not too difficult. The President.
However, libs are screaming all over the place that individuals who are not Tren de Aragua were swept up. That’s an individual claim that can be made after the fact, and doesn’t warrant a “class action” effective national injunction that requires a hearing for every person before the fact.
.
Maybe theFederal Reserve? The CCP? And maybe domestic terrorists.
Where you are uncertain is incredibly in error.
The law is still on t he e books.
War involves acts to destroy a nation.
Undeniably Venezuela did that through gangs and drugs, violence.
Without borders there is no nation.
A legal election elected a PRESIDENT, ergo it is recognized we are a bordered NATION.
Defending nation again at invasion is one of the few irrefutable responsibilities our small govt founders gave the presidency
The politicians and judges ruling to free and to defend illegals are all treasonous since these acts undeniably harm US citizens
Please reread the Constitution and clear away the fog that has been injected into our brains by nonsense and criminal kangaroo justice and socialist academia/media.
The Constitution is not remotely complicated.
The socialist ambiguity is straight out of the devil’s handbook of deception and distraction and doublespeak.
So let’s arrest them and place them on trial for Treason. Half measures will avail us nothing. Take the gloves off!
YESterday !
BRILLIANTLY, succinctly, irreproachably articulated !
Please do not fall into the Leftwing media narrative that the 1798 Alien Enemies Act is a “wartime” law. That is not how it is written.
The act applies either whenever the US is at declared war “or any invasion or predatory incursion shall be perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States, by any foreign nation or government, and the President of the United States shall make public proclamation of the event, all natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the hostile nation or government, being males of the age of fourteen years and upwards, who shall be within the United States, and not actually naturalized, shall be liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured and removed, as alien enemies.” is underway.” https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/alien-and-sedition-acts#enemies
President Trump has made a public proclamation March 15, 2025 via executive order that the US is experiencing an invasion and that the government of Venezuela was enabling that invasion. Prior to this Texas and other States have declared they were under invasion and requested assistance per Article IV, section 4 of the US Constitution. There is no requirement for Habeas Corpus during an invasion per Article I, section 9 of the US Constitution.
Section 2 of the AEA actually declares that when the President has made such a proclamation to bring the law into effect “it shall be the duty of the several courts of the United States, and of each state, having criminal jurisdiction, and of the several judges and justices of the courts of the United States,”… to have such aliens apprehended, processed and removed!!!
It could not possibly be more clear.
When the Congress enacted and the President signed the original 1798 law and began to employ it the US was NOT in a state of declared war with any country. The Revolution had already been settled (Treaty of Paris, 1783.) The War of 1812 was 14 years in the future. There were international tensions between the US and France and lingering tensions with Britain, Spain and others but those never rose to become an actual war.
The AEA is NOT a “wartime” law. It is a “US national sovereignty under threat” law.
President Trump is on very solid legal ground (from my non-lawyer’s perspective.)
Wonderfully stated.
<“When the Congress enacted and the President signed the original 1798 law and began to employ it the US was NOT in a state of declared war with any country.”
Not in a “declared state of war” rather the undeclared quasi-war with France 1798-1801.
<“There were international tensions between the US and France”
International tensions, as in the newly built frigate USS Constellation, Thomas Truxton commanding, put to sea and engaged and captured the French ship L’Insurgente (9 Feb 1799).
.
Yes, though remember the first war the new United States fought — the first Barbary War. Terrorists (pirates). Congress did NOT declare war.
.
Nope. See my previous as regards the quasi-war.
You mean you don’t know how 3 of the justices will rule. You can count on Ketanji, wise Latina, and Kagan to support terrorists — I mean, democrats. Those three are just like Boasberg and they were put on the court to advance progressive “values.” Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch will take the side of the Constitution and its vestiture of executive power in the President. Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Roberts… well, that will depend on a few things having nothing to do with the law: they will weigh their vote against either not ever being invited to DC soirees again or exposure of some career-ending peccadillo that someone is holding over their heads.
We’ll see – I don’t have much hope in the “supreme” court.
Ditto, and if necessary, President Trump will stand his ground and proceed with the deportations, and the nation will support him on this. You can count on it.
Yes, THIS,,
Rightly…..
EVER SO RIGHTLY SO !!!
“I don’t know, and I haven’t a guess how SCOTUS will rule.”
This, it seems to me, is how it should be.
The authors of the Constitution more than likely also wrote and passes the Alien Enemies Act.
They will essentially set up a system where the democrats will let illegals in en masse and set up a bureaucracy that makes it nearly impossible for anyone to get rid of them in any volume.
No way, Hosea.
It is precisely because due process is open to interpretation that we should treat it with the utmost care – not disregard it. The absence of a rigid scholarly consensus doesn’t mean we abandon the principle; it means we lean on the judiciary to ensure fairness when executive power expands into murky legal territory.
Bull.
Our judiciary has been exposed
Lean on a full blown anti Trump pro communist judiciary to ensure fairness, now that’s really really funny . These judges are democrat activists , there is no question about that .
You want the judiciary to ensure fairness? The SAME that didn’t give due process to J6ers?
Or the judicial cowards who didn’t immediately slap down Biden’s unconstitutional vaccine mandate?
Interpret this…… Illegal entry is illegal. The remedy is simple and obvious: deport and invite them for entry through proper channels —por favor. Ariba.
O GOOD LORD !
OPEN your eyes & take a look around…
Corruption on the right, CORRUPTION on the left, C O R R U P T I O N ALL AROUND………..
How do you think MAGA was born ? WHY do you think it’s thriving ?
WE the People are ALL bound to protect serve & defend the BEAUTIFUL U.S. Constitution from ALL ENEMIES…
foreign, domestic, DS & DS- COMPROMISED/CORRUPTED !!!
There is irrefutably no ‘due process’s for illegals.
I think you might be right Usjkash2.
Nor do illegal invader have the right to move freely around America.
Lawsuit after lawsuit was filed in the 70s ( I think) declaring the internment centers where illegals were being held were “unconstitutional” and the border jumpers could not be held there for more than a week or two.
Since the immigration courts were so backed up these criminals were released into the US “pending their court date” which none of them ever showed up for.
The destruction and disolving of our US/Mexico border has been destroyed and incrementally disolved over decades, mostly the last 40 years.
The lawyers and courts have possible “given” them this right illegally.
The destruction of our border, along with the invasion of millions from other countries is being implemented – on purpose! It’s all part of “the slow walk through our institutions.” It’s called C-O-M-M-U-N-I-S-M.
As for the legaility of the Alien’s Act, Trump is 100% correct. Gulag escapee aptly, and might I add, “beautifully” outlines the same, above.
However, I think the real issue before the Supreme Court is whether or not the “lower” District Courts have the authority to keep issuing orders which allegedly prevent our President’s E/O’s from taking effect time after time after time, basically nullifying his authority as granted by the Constititution.
When you consider how badly our magnificent President Trump was hated by the Bush Family, from the beginning of the 2016 Presidential Campaign (in 2015), would it not be possible that Jeb Boasberg is carrying out a Skull and Bones commitment to help a fellow Bonesman in any way possible down the road?
In the case of the Bush Family, there are three generations of Bonesmen – Prescott, George H. W. and George W. – so is it possible that there grew a connection that we are seeing play out today in the seeming determination of Jeb Boasberg to inflict as much as possible within – and beyond – his purview that he can bring against President Trump?
As we go along, seeing the Bush Family in action over the years, you have to see how fixated they are about the Presidency – really, imagine the vanity, the hubris of pushing themselves on the country with not only George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush – but then they seemed to think nothing wrong with pushing Jeb! So – the apparent plan was Bush 41, Bush 43, Bush 45!
President Trump and all of us MAGA voters really messed up that – but I wouldn’t put it past the Bush Family to still want to put in George Prescott Bush at the soonest opportunity. The Bush Family has certainly been doing everything possible to elevate George Prescott Bush in Texas politics, even to the level of Attorney General but Paxton won unequivocally – so then an impeachment was launched against Paxton – thankfully, Mr. Paxton fought like hell and had a great attorney, Tony Buzbee. A lot of prayers, too!
If George Prescott Bush COULD have been Texas AG and then at some point, become Texas Governor and then it would just be so natural for him to run for President!
Keep a sharp eye out for the Bush Family and the Bush Machine across the fruited plain – I think they STILL want to put in George Prescott Bush and all hands are on deck to help make that happen. I don’t think they have given up on their warped family dream.
One thing I hold to in faith, from what I understand in the Bible, that nothing is hidden, all shall be revealed. If Jeb Boasberg when taking an oath of office as a judge but within himself gave his pledge as a Bonesman a higher commitment, I daresay he could tell himself that no one would ever know, that he would not divulge this.
Our Heavenly Creator knows every hair on our head, He has superior knowledge – He has access to all things that would be the envy of the most accomplished and highly-skilled master of surveillance in the deep state.
Perhaps Jeb Boasberg has kept this all within himself but perhaps he has kept a diary all of these years and has kept a record of his accomplishments and his role in history.
These are illegals being deported. They did not follow the duly legislated process to enter the country. They have no legal right to remain in the US. They can be removed without Due Process. Nonetheless ICE is following legally accepted processes to get them out of the country. Due Process has been more than fully met.
Good comment Rowdyone.
A lot of us knew things were going to get worse before they got better.
At the time we were only speculating about the difficulty of the future.
Now we are here, living out what we knew was probably to come.
Like anything else most of us have experienced in life, the reality is a bit different than the opinions as to how things are going.
The details and specific of exactly what our Enemy will do is now coming to life before us.
Like David M wrote above we need not fear.
How we go about our lives from now on with Faith and the best actions we are capable of will possible make a lot of difference to those around us.
Fear Not, we are not alone in this Battle of Good vs Evil.
“Given due process”.
What an hypocritical utter crock. Was any such thing presented to Jan 6 persons the jerk railroaded?
Of course not. That’s why the term “insurrection” was parlayed far and wide. It’s the only thing you
can be charged with that supersedes due process.
The man is an utter bastard. That being said, my apologies to illegitimate children everywhere.
Boasburg and his cronie Roberts are on the same page. Both VERY CONFLICTED with their personal entanglements. Roberts, chief advisor is MARRIED TO M cCord , HATER IN CHIEF re PRES 45-47. Boasburg’s daughter daughter is raking amounts I’ve never seen in my personal monetary accounts as a blatant POTUS hater.
I agree with President Trump. Declare a National Emergency because THERE IS NO CURE UNDER THE LAW FOR TDS.
They’re not American citizens. They don’t deserve due process. They only deserve out.
Per the existing laws on immigration, deportation hearings are conducted by an Administrative Law Judge, thus the civil/criminal court system has no jurisdiction over deportation hearings and deportation orders unless they involve a question about whether the person before the immigration court could possibly claim to be a U.S. Citizen. I think that the Trump administration is keeping that argument under wraps to be deployed in the even that the Supreme Court fails to rein in these lefty Circuit Court judges.
astute point… I don’t KNOW that, but I trust you do…love learning here in the treehouse !
Thanks Artslap … for artfully dropping that in my lap !
They can “no standing” their way out of anything.
Why have presidential elections with judges
taking over Trump’s presidential authority?
alternatively – why ask permission from SCOTUS and implicitly acknowledge that they have this authority?
So the United States is actually a democracy, not a republic. Got it.
It becoming clear that DOGE must have cut off the grease that was being laundered back to this cabal…
This President and everyone else should realize at this point there will be no relief from the supreme court on this matter or any other matter involving plenary power of the President. It just doesn’t matter anymore what you understand about the constitution on this matter. None of these black robes are going to read the constitution and obey it. To be guided by and ruled by the reading of the constitution takes away the lawless powers of these courts. And it’s not a simple black and white “conservative versus progressive/lib” fracture that has taken place.
To truly understand what is taking place has very little to do with politics as you might understand it, or how the media paints it. The fact is that black robes in the modern era ARE A SEPARATE SECRET POLICE SPY STATE ORGANIZATION. Not in the same complete definition of FBI OR CIA, but secretive and unaccountable just the same. They move and act in similar ways for similar reasons: power, AND MONEY. (and to a lessor degree ego and personal ideology).
give you a quick analog: the FBI AND CIA will NEVER BE REFORM ITSELF. Why? because admitting to crimes, threatens the potential that it’s power is diminished. The power both have is that they can defy accountability….and thus, lawlessness and corruption can continue. It really is not difficult to understand. This has very little to do with politics. it is about power and money. When you understand why the SCOTUS, would have an interest in continuing the countermand the power of the Presidency, for ANY REASON, it is also helpful to understand this group of black robes are no different: it’s about the power and the money they wield that will never admit corruption, never allow reformation, and thus it produces its own self serving purpose to countermand the power of the other two branches of government. There is no one that can force them to change. And that is the reality. There is no means to erase this kind of power. There is, but few actually want to talk about it. Revolutions scare people. even so called tough and ready people.
regardless, it must be treated as a war, even if not winnable in this term.
first order of business and I’ll repeat it on blast for the upteenth time:
why is President Trump waiting to remove the classified clearance authorization for boasberg and roberts?
wouldn’t that be obvious, one of the very first orders to be issued once he got into office?
It’s not like no one understands that it was boasTURD and ROBERTS, the president of the FISC, who intentionally signed false and provably false fisa applications to spy on him and use that as a means to impeach him, to prosecute him?
remove their clearances…just do it. It’s a war. You have to be serious about this war. You have to understand if you are not taking action against the enemy, you simply give them space and power to operate.
it’s not a long term solution, but it puts the declaration of war in simple and enforceable terms. President Trump has the DOJ and the FBI now. (presumably). If these judges violate classified clearance laws, he can have them arrested.
or you can pretend these black robes are not the enemy, will use their powers properly and everything will be just hunky dory.
yeah, no…there are no white horses coming. You are either in the fight, or losing it. These Corruptors have no intention to back off…it’s the power and the money they expect to protect. EFF the constitution and what is right and wrong.
if you actually believe these people care about law and orders understand what they represent:
killer cartel terror members!
can it not be obvious by now these black robes do not represent anything close to justice?
God Bless America
I refused to believe it was this bad for a long time with a friend of 40 years ! I now tell him as I will tell you . You were right ! It is that bad !
Worse. Much, much worse, as we will soon see.
But we win, praise God!
Jeremiah 33
Hallelujah!
Their belief is that if they defer to Trump they will have negated a significant portion of the power of this segment of the judicial system. I really don’t think they will want to give up that power but I could be wrong.
My understanding is the House of Representatives can defund the district courts and even shut them down if necessary.
They can, but they won’t. They don’t have the stones to do it – they would rather behave like they are innocent bystanders because their sponsors (pHarma, etc.) like things just the way they are.
that is the claim, but lets examine this “logic” (it’s a false claim, spoiler!)
a. they can continue to act as judges and rule over cases absent clearances. there is no justifiable reasons to allow them to continue the clearances, given the FISA CRIMINAL ACTS that they both played a primary role.
b. while the president may not have the direct authority they be removed from courts, he does have the exclusive and sole plenary power over the entire classification program. he sets the table, he can remove chairs. it is just that simple.
c. in cases that involve CRIMINAL RULINGS AND (emphasis) NATIONAL SECURITY CLEARANCE AND NEED TO KNOW, THE PRESIDENT can impose upon them what I believe is the best way to handle these two jackwagons. They will be forced to refuse themselves, lacking access to national security material. Other judges may accomplish this in their stead. This quarantines these two scofflaws from what I believe they are accessing without any reason or cause to be disruptive to a national security threat. they become a threat to the presidents’ power to guide national security defenses and operations.
They have been riding free and clear for far too long. Removing their clearances is appropriate. it also gives the President a chance to catch them violating national security clearance regulations…and if they dare to do it, he can have them arrested.. I have little doubt they understand this. But do far, with clearances intact they are able to move freely and do just about anything at any time to thwart the President. This must end. It must also be a signal to all judges, and to every single member of the national security segments: violate the conditions of your clearance at great peril.
God Bless America
BRAVO… & MANY ENCORES, Sure to come !
The judiciary, whether local, State or federal, began to notice the people weren’t really paying attention to their power grabs beginning with the State of California judges over-ruling election results when various property taxes were voted down and a judge stepped in and said that vote doesn’t matter so basically cancelled the vote, and no one, whether a State representative, the Governor, nor any citizens voting groups contested that ruling – and then judges in other jurisdictions began following those same steps.
Mostly in small matters but with each time a judge over-ruled an election result the judges across the country began to believe they hold more power than their State or the federal constitutions have given them in writing;
it’s now gotten to the point that the judges sitting on the D.C. circuit believe they are just as powerful, if not more so, than either of the other two branches of government.
I’m not holding my breath that this Supreme Court is going to rule in the Executive branch’s favor, instead expecting they will simply rule the case is not seasoned yet so must continue to go through the whole appellate process before the Supremes will consider taking it on.
Then, we citizens will decide what the next steps will be.
The Judges may have robes, but Our President has “We The People”… Honor and abide by our Constitution. Don’t make US choose, YOU must choose wisely and righteously. Any other outcome could get ugly quickly. We WILL stand when necessary…
“We WILL stand when necessary…”
i really wish i believed that.
In Kansas, the Christians showed up by the thousands to speak against the Satanic Mass. Speak and pray in great numbers. Hallelujah!!!
I agree with your analysis.
People are saying, sure, there will be no accountability, that’s not President Trump’s first priority, he’s interested in ” successes”, which could be economic, peace in Ukraine, etc.
But without something to get them to back off, these power mongers, even if they are getting away “Scot-free” they won’t let him have successes.
Excellent Regitiger
The next step declaring Marshall Law?
Don’t the US Marshalls work for the District Courts?
Of course, THAT was sarcasm, right? If not, all I can say is, “Wow!” Such a comment would indicate a U.S. education emunating from within the last 10-15 years, or even longer…
“The fact is that black robes in the modern era ARE A SEPARATE SECRET POLICE SPY STATE ORGANIZATION. Not in the same complete definition of FBI OR CIA, but secretive and unaccountable just the same. They move and act in similar ways for similar reasons: power, AND MONEY.”
Follow the money. Hopefully President Trump can use the NSA and US Treasury databases to find the corrupt money going to these black robes (and other corrupt politicians), their families, their NGO’s and non-profits, and foreign bank accounts. As Wayne Root said, “The way to uncover the fraud, treason and corruption by these dirty judges is to attack them with forensic audits of their budgets, bank accounts, assets, and lifestyle compared to their modest judicial salaries. Let’s sick armies of accountants, IRS agents and Treasury Dept auditors on them.”
The only way to stop a steamroller is with a bulldozer.
dear Heavenly Father, make Trump and his cabinet be the bulldozer.
Yes, agree on all your conclusions, except…
The President cannot remove the judge’s security clearance because sitting, Senate-confirmed federal judges do not require a security clearance. They are part of a separate and coequal branch of government. Therefore they don’t require clearance from the executive branch agencies to view classified information. That was codified in law, 1980, 18 USC Appendix 9.
Everybody else in the court – the court staff, the attorneys, the clerks – they all require a clearance. The judge does not.
Bizarre? yes. Dangerous? yes. But that seems to be how the law is currently written.
It would probably require Congress to amend that part of the law. They could probably create a requirement for district and circuit judges to maintain a clearance. They might not be able to require SCOTUS justices to get a clearance because the Supreme Court is actually mentioned in the Constitution.
court judges absolutely do require and are given clearances. and it is NOT automatic. the law you linked simply sets forth how courts, clerks, juries are to operate within the classification and clearance setting. it makes it formal.
a PRESIDENT IS THE CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY FOR EVERYTHING. He sets it, he can reset it. At any time, for any reason he chooses.
He can therefore remove for any reason a clearance. And it would be appropriate given it should be obvious to anyone by now that only Superman himself could have reacted in the faster than light motion of boasturd to issue an order over the return of the cartel terror actors. Pending a full review of exactly how he got his information, based on what kind of access, or from whom may have had access, allows the President to take a new kind of position of his power:
has this court judge violated his access to the information such that he was aware of the secrets through any number of spying programs he had access to? Or did someone else who had this access give it to him? or is there a rat mole within the Team Trump that leaked it out?
there HAS TO BE A REASON why BoasBURG acted so quickly. There was no official publication of this operation. None that I am aware of. It would be insane to intentionally publish it. This arrest and deportation operation HAS to be at the highest levels of security. Otherwise, we put lives at risk. And that is no cliche. There are real men and women who are putting their lives on the line each and every day out there, investigating, arresting, jailing, and part of a quite large operation involving privately contracted aircraft, buses, and “other” that are sending these criminals. They represent a hyper violent arm of a well funded and organized drug cartel. You don’t talk about fight club. Ever! So how was it that BoasTURD got his information so quickly? President Trump has the responsibility to find that out and lock this down and make sure that this judge and no other judge may have this information. He is responsible for the lives of those who are following his orders to do so. This is a war, even if not spelled out in red letters. He is acting commander and chief. The responsibility is nothing short of profound. He must act accordingly to find out how this information is getting out.
now lets go back to your link. within it, you will find this also pertains ONLY to criminal cases. (judges do not have classified access or clearance for matters of civil claims…if that is not obvious). So the question is:
what criminal violation is before this court to justify access to classified information…what part of ANY clearance applies to a judge who does not have a criminal case before him? see the problem?
and if BoasTURD replies back and says, he did not access classified clearance, then FORCE HIM TO EXPLAIN EXACTLY HOW AND WHEN HE DID GET THE INFORMATION>
as to Roberts, the strategy is similar but for different reasons:
a. he IS the president of FISC and it was his responsibility to review and to control judges that HE HIMSELF SELECTED, about the FISA applications that were rubber stamped based on provably false allegations of a crime against a President! That is a reason to have a loss in confidence at a minimum. But more practically, a removal of his clearance is justifable because he is either incompetent, feckless, or does not take his responsibilities seriously. The fact that he did not remove BoasTURD or any of the other judges who rubber stamped is evidence to justify he is unfit to have the nations’ highest clearance. Additionally, his judgement is despicable: he actually promoted BoasTURD! this even after it was revealed that BoasTURD KNEW the FISA applications were based on fraud! So we have corruption and that is more than enough reason and fits perfectly into a solid judgement that he cannot be trusted with national security material. not even in criminal cases! especially in criminal cases.
both can continue to be judges (I am not arguing here that President remove them from court…that is a different argument..and one that is clearly the decision of a congressional impeachment). What I am saying is they can not have classified material. Not even in criminal cases. Other judges will have to resolve cases that requires classified material. But not these two.
why do I believe this is important?
a. both committed crimes and are obviously tied to spying programs that allow them access FOR ANY REASON. And that does not satisfy a clearance authorization. It says just the opposite.
b. both are attempting to countermand a president of the United States over a national security threat. This is also obvious. They cannot be trusted and neither has displayed authentic motives for doing so.
c. the coincidence of BoasTURD being selected over and over and over is hog wash. This is obvious the work of intention and this means at least these two people are actively engaging in a form of treason…at the very least a form of mutiny.
remove their clearances…begin an investigation to learn how boasTURD got his information so quickly. A mole hunt needs to happen if that hasn’t occurred to Kash Patel …hello kash, can you start moving and get approval for a grand jury from bondi? like Ricky tick? now, pronto.
put BoasTURD in surveillance. yes, initiate the power of the president to capture his moves and data and comms. he will violate his clearance removal…it will happen. then arrest him.
as far as Roberts, there are no criminal cases decided at SCOTUS. the link you provided are for clearances related SOLELY to criminal cases. If classified material is required to be reviewed at SCOTUS for some future ruling, then he must recuse on the basis he has no clearance.
this is how you do it.
God Bless America
According to the Alien Enemies Act, judges in 1798 America had to preside over the hearings into how individual aliens, who are suspected of being enemies of the US, have to handle such matters.
(1). Only aliens residing, or apprehended, in a local federal judge’s district can have their cases heard before that local judge.
(2). The local judge has to determine the status of a given alien according to the guidance of the PRESIDENT’S Proclamation that invokes the enforcement of the Alien Enemies Act. In addition to the proclamation, any additional regulations, enacted by the President, that flow from the proclamation inform the judge’s final decision.
Boasberg stepped outside his jurisdiction according to the Alien Enemies Act, Section 23.
I would say that a majority of the black robes in the nation don’t believe in the Constitution or the nation’s founding principals and proudly view themselves as activists intent upon ‘correcting’ the error of our nation’s founding fathers’ ways. A considerable portion of them are also as corrupt as the universe is vast.
This from Google AI to respond to the question–“How do Federal District Court Judges obtain security clearances?
“Federal District Court judges, while not required to have security clearances, can obtain them upon request, and the Department of Justice (DOJ) handles the process, with the court notifying the DOJ security officer when access to classified information is needed.”
You ARE a treasure to treepers & hopefully to MULTITUDES very FAR & WIDE beyond, TCT site, per treepers’ aggregate “multiplier effect”, reliably astute regitiger !
VSGPDT is always operating on many, MANY mutually reinforcing, educational & rectifying channels, INCLUDING CONSTANTLY red-pilling the ever-growing MAGA masses…. BUT…
It IS a war, & VSGPDJT is doing his God-inspired, Holy Spirit-led humanly-best to exhaust all actual & perceived-to-be “by-the-book” appropriate channels (e.g., “take it to the SC”) to exponentially amplify the crucially central, mission-critical goal of red-pilling/info-arming We the People, who, along with his gifted MAGATeam, must likewise ceaselessly mega-MAGAly max out the retributive pressure that MUST lead to the DS’s utterly obliterating pillage !
Q: “the military is (ed: ultimately) the only way” !!
MT’s for the provably treasonous !!
God help us, God Bless America, & GOD SAVE our (potentially late, great) Republic of the U.S.A. !!!
Everything regarding the John Roberts capitulation must be exposed. The Chief Justice of the United States is anti Constitution. Why should this be accepted?
Just remember, the IC has spied on all the SC justices and has blackmail material on all of them. Until we end fisa 703 this will continue. Every congressman, senator and judge is compromised. Until the patriot act is ended, our Republic is doomed
They will still spy on them, and us, patriot act or not.
“This is a major inflection point. Let’s see what happens.” If SCOTUS refuses to act, or acts against our Constitution,
American Patriots have some deep thinking to do.
The American Patriot needs organization and a field leader they can trust, which could be why the commies want the Secretary of Defense Hegseth removed.
This most likely does end with the US military – or at least parts of it (National Guard, Marines) called up to fight foreign troops, foreign paramilitaries, and domestic collaborators on US soil. In US blue cities, mostly.
Long previewed. IYKYK.
I’m glad we will have Hegseth in charge at that moment. And behind him, Kellogg, Flynn, and many others.
Yes, the main target of the Signal op was Hegseth. Judging by the Mockingbird Media headlines.
GITMO vs El Salvadore:
1) Hegseth went to Cuba several weeks ago, supposedly prepping to receive illegals, then along comes the DC circuit protest over crap like “prison conditions unsuitable”
2) Trump shuttles Venezuela’s “Boasberg Five” foot soldiers where Kristi Noem scores a “leave now” multi-purpose photo op designed for multiple targets
3) GITMO occupancy is curiously thin, same for US FEMA camps
4) Grenell probably handed Maduro an “invitation” from Trump before he scooped up the hostages and headed home
Imperial Judiciary.
I’m not making any predictions, one way or another, but I will impart the reality that these justices do respect one another.
They will have deep conversations about this issue, as they have in the past and will continue in the future.
I have often heard that this really a Thomas Court; don’t know if that’s true or not but I believe Justice Thomas does indeed have sway, right along with Justice Alito.
So, bear in mind, there are many factors that will be discussed behind closed doors when making this decision.
I pray that God’s hand will guide their reason and logic during their decision-making process.
Yes, this is the Thomas court. I love Thomas. But even he will find against the Trump admin, if they decide to review it. Frankly, it’s an easy case.
Reasoning?
I think it is a slam dunk that there is simply no judicial review on alien deportation in the midst of a presidentially declared invasion.
If the President gets it wrong, the constitutionally prescribed remedy is the next election, not the courts.
Political decision doctrine.
Frankly, you’re getting repetitive.
Are you a constitutional Lawyer? First of all we have not seen an easy case in several years. Judges think they are Soliman They chop every baby that comes to court in half.
Its the everyone deserves to be heard. All ideas are equal. I’m okay and your okay transactional Justice. it is pomp and circumstance justice.
So I am going to sit down and smoke my hopium and hope the Supreme Supreme court intervenes and turns the self aggrandizing meat puppets into Real people with the ability to discern good from evil.
What was that i heard you whisper under your breath ” Judges are not suppose to decide between good and evil just interpret the law” Law colleges have been teaching this horse pucky for years now. It is much easier to get that occasional wealthy child rapping, mother killing, drug lord, out if you can suppress judgement and their are paydays for everybody involved.
Judges are an ancient judeo concept their job to make judgement right/wrong. good/evil. That is still their job to make Judgement.
Justice Thomas Takes Aim At Insane Tactic Of Nationwide Injunctions:
“Injunctions that prohibit the Executive Branch from applying a law or policy against anyone…have become increasingly common. District courts, including the one here, have begun imposing universal injunctions without considering their authority to grant such sweeping relief. These injunctions are beginning to take a toll on the federal court system—preventing legal questions from percolating through the federal courts, encouraging forum shopping, and making every case a national emergency for the courts and for the Executive Branch.
I am skeptical that district courts have the authority to enter universal injunctions. These injunctions did not emerge until a century and a half after the founding. And they appear to be inconsistent with longstanding limits on equitable relief and the power of Article III courts. If their popularity continues, this Court must address their legality. …
Why does this matter to non-lawyers? This is a question of who gets to decide the policy questions facing America: Is it our elected representatives, our elected president, or unelected lifetime-appointed federal judges?
Nationwide injunctions mean that each of the more than 600 federal district judges in the United States can freeze a law or regulation throughout the country — regardless of whether the other 599 disagree. That’s a threat to the proper functioning of the federal government for a number of reasons.”…….
A Thomas Court indeed!
Wow!
I don’t think so.
See Gipper’s post below; it’s from Justice Thomas.
You’ll love it, as much as I do.
They can use their usual “the case hasn’t seasoned/matured yet” in lieu of their usual “no standing” as a way to not do their job, sending it back to the lower court to hold a trial, have the executive branch lose and appeal to the full circuit, lose there, then, in about 4 years, the Supreme Court will hear it or, declare it’s moot because by then there will be a new President taking office because the Supreme’s will have run out the clock.
That is their usual process when they don’t want to take a case. There will be four that want to take it (the usual suspects) while the majority including Roberts and Barrett joining the liberal judges to send it back to the lower court.
Hoping they take it, not holding my breath.
The Founders set up the government with co-equal branches and specific responsibilities. Each was to be naturally jealous of its turf and fight tooth and nail to prevent the other two from encroaching. The Founders knew that man is full of vices, and men are collectively and reliably power hungry, so let the boys go at it, and give them rules to keep each other straight. That’s about the extent of it.
So, the President executes his duties and the judges say he can’t do that. Well, as in sports, he who has the ball has the advantage. It is the others who must strip it away–standing there and protesting that “you can’t do that” is not going to wrest the ball away, and no normal man is going to just hand it over.
Thus, it comes down to this: the judge can order what he wants, but if Congress does not impeach Trump and remove his power that way, the Executive branch that enforces the law is left as the Enforcer of the Judges’ rulings. The judge gives a decision, but someone else acts upon it. In this instance, it’s the President. And, if he disagrees, well, there you go.
Invoking the Alien Enemies Act – a RELIC from 1798 – to justify mass deportations under the vague banner of “national security” should alarm anyone who values due process and constitutional restraint. Full stop.
The Founders didn’t draft separation of powers so the executive could bypass the judiciary whenever it feels “delicate negotiations” are at stake. If anything, the courts exist precisely to check sweeping executive claims of authority, especially when those claims involve targeting entire nationalities under wartime logic in peacetime.
I don’t agree with PT here at all, no matter how it is spun.
You don’t understand the entire reason our Founding Fathers created an Executive. It was precisely to act swiftly in ways a bureaucracy never could.
But Joey Cartel’s mass importations were just fine.
This is Asymmetric Warfare by demons who want us ruined and dead. To hell with them in Jesus’ Name.
Wake up and get in the fight. Full stop.
Not one judge has said that they can’t be deported.
I thought Boasburg ordered planes returned?
Not one judge lifted a finger to stop the Invasion, but they did help overthrow PDT, The People and OUR Constitution.
Frankly, President Trump is far too nice, but Jesus isn’t, thank God.
You need to read the US Constitution and perhaps take a Civics Course.
These people are ILLEGAL ALIENS; that in and of itself is a CRIME.
The entire concept of Judicial Review (when a judge declares some law or executive action to be unconstitutional) is nowhere in the US Constitution. It is a “relic” from a very flawed ruling in 1803 (Marbury v Madison) where CJUS John Marshall was acting with clear political intent rather than judicial prudence. Judicial Review is merely a tradition based on vague ideas from British common law. It’s not law, not in the US Constitution.
It could be (probably should be) wiped out entirely by Congress passing a law removing it. Then we could go back to the original notion put forth by some of the founders during the debates over ratifying the Constitution – that each of the three branches should determine its own views of what the Constitution means and let checks and balances play out.
Obviously if the courts accept the concept of Judicial Review no law can possibly change that.
uh… WRONG… that’s called “legisprudence” (nothing prudent about it)…
BLATANTLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL !
I suppose you think the Constitution is a relic too because it is considerably older than the Alien Enemies Act…
The president is THE chief law enforcement official in the land and it is both his DUTY and his RIGHT to enforce the laws of this nation – which in this case includes mass deportations of EVERYONE that entered this nation ILLEGALLY.
It’s hilarious that you try to invoke the concept of separation of powers when it is that very separation that precludes the judiciary from interfering with one of a president’s primary duties to protect and defend the nation and her people from all enemies, foreign and domestic, and to ensure the sovereignty of the nation – which includes enforcing its borders and preventing its invasion by any means necessary.
In fact, it is FAR past time for him to start enforcing 8 USC 1324 and arresting and prosecuting every single politician and bureaucrat that is involved with aiding, abetting, or encouraging the illegal alien invasion.
The same goes true for those who are conspiring with or by their actions accomplices to the organized crime groups that are trafficking drugs, children, and illegals of all stripes.
GHOULISH, more than just hilarious…tho, YES, HILARIOUSLY sophomoric an uniformed argument !
YES & YES to your 4th & 5th paragraphs…
Traitors deserve their Constitutionally just reward.
Q; MT’s !
We have your opinion. We can quickly dismiss it. None of these Leftist judges were elected to anything. President Trump is not acting OUTSIDE OF HIS AUTHORITY. He is the only national politician elected by the entire nation’s voters. He told Americans what he would do if he was re-elected and now he is doing it.
Federal district judges cannot run the military. They cannot run the various agencies. They cannot dictate the spending of federal dollars. They have no enforcement power against the elected President. They cannot imprison him. They cannot remove him.
They don’t hire and fire federal employees.
They cannot order the stormy oceans to be calm.
Right now, these judges are beyond any rational authority to order what they are attempting to order.
The people are sovereign and they have chosen their President.
These judges will be thrown upon the ash heap of history for their hubris and arrogance. They are nothing but petty would-be tyrants.
They are poseurs.
So you seem to prefer true democracy.
and TRAITORS !
<“Alien Enemies Act – a RELIC from 1798”
I believe it was widely used in WWI against Germans (maybe before?), so maybe not so much a relic
By your reasoning then, it is the judiciary that is affiorded “unchecked” powers? What if one of these activist judges declares that we are not to leave our homes and/or wear a mask or must stand 10 feet apart, uh, oh wait, not a good example, say we were ordered to sacrifice our first born when the sun rose tomorrow, who has the power to prevent such a thing? Are YOU going to do that? Or are you going to contact your legislator and ask that they/he/she/them prepare a proposal to abolish this “mandate”? Why even have a President?
Wake up, Carl! You’re leaning way left and starting to speak a bit of Mandarin, which leaves me wondering if I should ask your view on the 2nd Amendment? Probably not.
I wonder if Elon has figured out how the DS communicates? It’s clear that their initiatives to hamper PT are coordinated.
So how?
My bet is Signal.
So was the recent issue with PT teams using Signal a setup? Meaning when Boasberg demands the comms are preserved that Pam if and when she launches an investigation into the FISA Court & Spying on Americans, she too requires the Signal comms to be preserved and subpoenaed.
And guess who just may be on those subpoenaed Signal Comms?
Maybe a Trump boomerang?
I’m sure Elon has figured out many things that he is not telling publicly but President Trump surely knows.
Democrat Open Border Policy.
Foreign National Invasion.
Illegal aliens are Foreign Nationals that illegally
entered the USA.
–
A country without borders cannot exist as a nation.
-“In a Friday post on X, Gabbard said she revoked the clearance per a Trump directive. ”
https://www.foxnews.com/us/tulsi-gabbard-revokes-security-clearances-access-classified-information-biden-harris-clinton
“No Standing……”
or 5/4 and liberals win……again……
3 liberals and Roberts plus Coney Barrett…..
“adoptionmail” for one…..
the other…..any guesses…..???
If the Supreme Court fails to take up the issue of judicial overreach and settle it once and for all, President Trump will be fully justified to declare multiple SCOTUS seats “vacant” and nominate qualified candidates to fill them.
Do your job or get out of the way.
Yes, let’s pack the courts like the Dems want to do. I’m sure that will work out well.
It is ludicrous, totally beyond belief that the executive may not have the authority to throw out anyone without a visa, let alone criminals. That is his job. It is as insane as arguing a man can be a woman. It cannot be tolerated.
In El Salvadore they solved the problem by passing a law that all judges must retire at age 65. That got rid of most of them. Then they stipulated that individual judges could continue on the basis of need as decided by the President.
What it comes down to is really Congress needing to act. These political judges are trashing laws which Congress made and Congress should put a stop to it.
Congress does have a say and a few of the “boys” have written legislation limiting lower court justices authority.
I just hope and pray they do it sooner rather than later.
Just finished reading the filing; it’s only 44 pages. There’s a ton of material there for the Supreme Court to take any one of the issues that the Administration’s filings bring up and stop this lawfare in its tracks.
Maybe the Supreme Court will act the way we hope they will.
I’m looking to Justice Thomas to lead, along with Justice Alito, Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Gorsuch to fire away and urge Justice Roberts using it’s the best remedy for “institutional” workings.
Since Justice Roberts is all about elitist institutionalism, I’m praying God whispers in his ear this time and says: “Just do it, John!”
This is what Grok thinks (it also refuses to stop thinking it’s Groucho Marx):
“The Supreme Court should rule to limit these nationwide injunctions from lower courts—they’re too broad, too quick, and they tie the administration’s hands before the ink’s dry on the appeal papers. But they shouldn’t give Trump a blank check either. If the administration’s defying a clear congressional mandate, like paying for work already in the bag, the justices ought to say, “Sorry, pal, the law’s the law—fork it over.” Maybe set some ground rules: let lower courts issue orders, but keep ‘em narrow and give the government breathing room to appeal without the whole country grinding to a halt.”
The comments amuse me.
A) Some of y’all seem to think Team Trump wasn’t expecting the lawfare, and…
B) Seem to have forgotten how badly everything “they” try against Trump boomerangs on them.
Do the doomqueers have a learning disability?? I mean this has been going on for YEARS now. It’s not like it’s new. 🤷♂️
.
Oh don’t say it’s true Boasberg is NOT lying about his motive for these TRO’s
Lock Him Up for lying to the courts about his real goals.
this seems to be somewhat similar to the Barbary Pirate issue, which saw President Thomas Jefferson dispatch the US navy to destroy Pirate ships that had been harassing commercial shipping lanes that the US merchant vessels was engaged. There was no declaration of war, it was a law enforcement activity carried out by the US Navy.
Wow LitleRed,
I am just back from a three week break in the Barbary Coast (Agidir Morocco)
The only pirates left there are those charging the rip off prices for a pint of beer.
IMHO, this emergency appeal to the Supreme Court to stop judicial overreach is like an NFL coach accepting a bad call from a referee who has historically exhibited bias against his team, ON A CRUCIAL PLAY that will affect the outcome of the game.
The coach has the authority to CHALLENGE THE CALL and use instant replay to overturn the bad call. This instant replay challenge provides the STRONGEST OPPORTUNITY for a fair and correct result for the team AND THE ENTIRE GAME.
Leaving the decision to stop the judicial overreach in the hands of Justice Roberts and the Supreme Court IS THE EQUIVALENT to accepting the bad call on the football field from the biased referee, and not utilizing the instant replay challenge ON A CRUCIAL PLAY.
Encouraging and supporting the House of Representatives to DO THEIR JOB by using their constitutional authority to defund, restructure and/or eliminate these INFERIOR courts IS THE EQUIVALENT of using instant replay on the football field as the STRONGEST OPPORTUNITY for a fair result, which is allowed by the rules of the game.
Well, that’s an interesting perspective.
I’m taking my chances with President Trump, because I believe he has a few cards to play and he is making strategic moves to make a very strong point, regardless of the Supreme Court’s ultimate decision.
My instinct, (based on my research of Donald John Trump for many years), he has a plan which will settle the matter for the good of America, a Constitutional Republic; not a democracy.
After declaring war on terrorists, set up military tribunals and establish p o w camps with military baracks for courtrooms. 10 rows of 10. 3 – 8 hour shifts per day. 6 days per week. 4 hearings per hour. Full bus loads in and full bus loads return trip with the previous day’s deportation rulings to the Mexican border or an air force base for OTMs. 100 courtrooms x 3 shifts = 300 judges + 30 substitutes for no shows = 330 judges x six figure salary. We can get every illegal out for $88 billion in 5 years. A deportation assembly line machine. Just might be the only way to do it if we can’t get a Supreme Court ruling. Better than a civil war at least as a last resort.
Speaking of the case being given to the most corrupt judge in that district, Congress or the judiciary itself needs to create new rules that properly rotates the judges on cases involving federal officials – example, cases involving the president or presidential powers.
Instead of a pure “random pick” that involves all the judges, the “random pick” needs to take place only with those who haven’t had a similar case or a case that involved the same official or agency until they have all been selected, after which they all go back into the “random drawing” pool.
Further, the judiciary or Congress needs to skewer Boasberg for not recusing himself due to his family’s involvement with aiding and abetting illegal aliens.
Be fair. If you can’t be fair, be gone.
Recusal requirements should be written into law. It should not be up the person who “should” rescuse to decide not to recuse himself/herself without consequences. That contradicts any logic at all and it contradicts human nature itself.
There are some guidelines on the books about it…the issue is that the decisions aren’t reviewed as a matter of course, in large part because nobody wants to question a judge that may decide their case.
Such reviews should be automatic and be done by judges from A DIFFERENT DISTRICT in such a manner that if one reviews recusal questions for a judge, that same judge isn’t the one that reviews yours – eliminating the tit for tat or recalcitrance to rule against another for fear of such reprisal.
What should not be involved in recusal decisions is political opinions or viewpoints of family members or other 1st amendment related issues and the like – only financial considerations, such as daughters who work for agencies that depend upon funding related to illegal aliens for example…
yes… ALL televised…LIVE !
Need to shut down and get some rest. But James Howard Kunstler has an interesting point to make. Sorry if I repeating any other post :
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/bedlam-pending
In the big picture, siding with tattooed Venezuelan illegal alien gangbangers is a losing strategy for the Democrats and partisan Democrat judges.
Judge Boasberg is only “winning” with his Deep State allies and the looniest of the liberal loons.
More and more younger people, Hispanic and Black voters are turning against the Democrats.
Obama is fast receding into the rear view mirror. Young people that supported him in 08 and 12 are getting older and wiser. They don’t want Venezuelan gangbangers on their lawn.
The Administration Goes To the Supreme Court Over Removal Of Venezuelan Gang Members As Alien Enemies
https://shipwreckedcrew.substack.com/p/the-administration-goes-to-the-supreme?r=gfi7k&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true
Trump doesn’t need to obey the SCOTUS if it backs the traitors. All he needs to do is invoke executive privilege as George Washington did over the confidential Jay Treaty communications and simply refuse to do it. Or as Lincoln did refusing to obey the Taney court over habeas corpus during the war between the States. If the executive refuses to comply with judicial overreach, there is nothing the judges can do as the enforcement of laws is solely a preserve of the executive.
Also, there should be no problem with firing executive employees at will without referring to the corrupt legislative branch and the union neanderthals’ perversion of the constitution should be brought to an end speedily and all employees transferred to Schedule F.
Biden and Obama refused to obey the courts when it was not to their liking.
Now you are talking.
Please explain why your duly elected President has to comply with these marxist junior judges?
I cannot see why he he cannot say ‘Get lost’ to the lot of them.
RED-PILLING OP… WILL come to a timely conclusion…
Art of War !
Because Rino congress is looking for an excuse to impeach.
You already have the authority as outlined in the Constitution. Why on earth are u seeking approval from scotus?!?,
The ball has been hit squarely into the Supreme Court’s area. Now Chief Justice Roberts is going to have to choose between backing up the lower court judges, thereby reducing the Judiciary’s prestige and respect, or following through on his shot across the bow of all circuit judges to eliminate their ability to issue nationwide injunctions, which was handed down recently.
Roberts will send everything back to the inferior court(s) to reconsider……just to tie up PDJT.
There are no, or very few, progressives who so much as pay lip homage to the Constitution. Certainly, none of the activists masquerading as “judges” do anything other than laugh and smirk at the Constitution for the United States of America.
Sundance nailed it when he said that “this is a major inflection point”. President Trump is absolutely correct in his management of the nation’s security and the associated fiscal management. IMESHO, there are some lower court “judges” that need to removed from specific cases due to serious “conflicts of interest”, as that is a violation of the Federal Code of Ethics.
It will be interesting to hear how soon that Roberts will reply. It would be great to hear Justice Thomas’ opinion.
JUDICIAL TYRANNY
Blabbering Chuckles Schumer gave up their strategy… pumping 225 radicalized progressive activists “judges” into federal courts is their plan …
My suggestion is look at their finances and the Soros clan.
And why has the Senate not yet confirmed Trump’s nominee for Solicitor General–Dean Sauer–the former AG of Missouri? He was finally reported out of the Judiciary Committee on March 13 but his nomination is still pending on the Senate Executive Calendar awaiting floor action.
@WallStreetApes
Federal Activist Judge James Boasberg is as corrupt as they come
– Judge James Boasberg’s wife Elizabeth Leslie Manson (didn’t take his last name) has taken $50 million from taxpayers
– $5 million was sent overseas to the Philippines
– Taxpayers pay her NGO $15 million per year
– $1.3 million in paycheck loans
– She received $801 employer retention credit (mislabeled from PPP program) (PPP and ERC loans they were not entitled to)
When do people go to prison? https://x.com/i/status/1906314752126759081