With around 50 days remaining to stir up as much trouble as possible, and with around 50 days of strategic activity left in order to Trump-proof the UE coalition of the NATO alliance, the U.K and France are in “classified” discussions about sending their troops into Ukraine before President Trump takes office.
It should be remembered that President Barack Obama did not want to intervene in Libya, circa 2011. That was a decision made by The U.S. State Department and CIA, pushed by Hillary Clinton, Samantha Power and Director Leon Panetta, and ultimately, militarily, executed by NATO Commander Admiral James Stavridis. And yes, Libya was not a threat to NATO…. but it happened anyway.
The U.K recently signed a mutual defense agreement with Moldova, promising to come to their aid if conflict with Russia escalated into the country. Now we see reports of the U.K traveling to France to create a two-party coalition within the larger NATO assembly, intended to send military troops into Ukraine.
Is an attack against allied troops analogous with an attack against a NATO member? Before you answer that question, remind yourself of the justification for the reference Libya intervention, the infamous “Responsibility To Protect” or R2P. Now, using that framework, revisit the question. I digress.
Le Monde – […] As the conflict in Ukraine enters a new phase of escalation, discussions over sending Western troops and private defense companies to Ukraine have been revived, Le Monde has learned from corroborating sources. These are sensitive discussions, most of which are classified – relaunched in light of a potential American withdrawal of support for Kyiv once Donald Trump takes office on January 20, 2025.
The debate about sending troops to Ukraine, which French President Emmanuel Macron initiated at a meeting between Kyiv’s allies in Paris in February, was strongly opposed by some European countries, led by Germany. However, it was relaunched in recent weeks thanks to the visit to France of the UK prime minister, Keir Starmer, for the November 11th commemorations. “Discussions are underway between the UK and France on defense cooperation, particularly with a view to creating a hard core of allies in Europe, focused on Ukraine and wider European security,” confided a British military source to Le Monde. (read more)
Almost all modern “western” wars are bankers’ wars. To understand the activity, it is worth paying attention to who is the benefactor and who is the beneficiary in the Corporate/Government relationship.
History does not always repeat; however, it is almost guaranteed to rhyme.
JPM Chase is a “Criminal Enterprise”……..They facilitated the Epstein Banking system, had a CARGO ship full of cocaine confiscated, they launder CARTEL money…..They SPOOF the Gold/Silver markets, naked short your stocks,the list goes on and on. Don’t believe me? Take a look since 2000…..
https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/parent/jpmorgan-chase
So JP Morgan and Blackrock control what happens.
So what if one of them had a conscience and said to the Deep State, “Ukraine is just too risky, we will not loan money or invest.”
The government tells JPMorgan and Blackrock to make a bunch of subprime loans with no money down on homes the buyer cannot afford. So what if they said, “No. that is just too risky.”
What politicians excel at doing is putting the blame for failure on someone other than themselves. The Republicans have controlled the House for 2 years and we have not had a budget or cut one dollar in spending.
When the Deep State said you must have huge DEI Departments, what if Walmart said, “No DEI is an extra cost that our customers cannot bear, we have to hire the best qualified.”
When the Deep State said you must spy on your customers, what if Google said, “No, we cannot let you spy on our customers search or emails.”
When those of you that hate banksters and big business go looking for the root cause of the problem, you won’t find it in the City of London, you will find the root cause in either Washington DC or Beijing.
With out the American taxpayer implied guarantee of the Federal Reserve, the very same Federal Reserve that underwrites every mistake made by the Blackrocks and J.P. Morgans, these “Too Big (Jigged) To Fail” monsters would die the deaths they deserve.
TOO BIG TO EXIST.
Zelensky knows how to cajole Macron, if Macron even needs any cajoling.
Zelensky, Trudeau & Macron.
The three stooges.
Three birds of a stinking feather.
If the belligerent French and British want to go it alone, let their land become War Zones, then let them go at it.
BUT do not expect other NATO nations to march over the cliff with you.
But that is the point of NATO. Where they go, we go.
Time to end NATO. It is an independently run war machine and is unconstitutional. It undermines our sovereignty.
NATO is a defense alliance. If a NATO member starts a war are the other members obligated to join them?
THIS!!!
Macron and Starmer could not agree on lunch or who is going to pay for it.
I guarantee they could agree on who will foot the bill on lunch. The US taxpayers.
OH.MY.GOD! Not again!
Can America get completely out of NATO? We pay for all of it’s budget and then some with the grafting, our young pay in blood for the wars they get us into and I really do not think those Western European nations will lift a finger to help us if America needs them.
The U.K. and France’s discussions to send NATO troops to Ukraine risk escalating tensions and dividing the alliance. The timing, just before Trump’s presidency, suggests a strategic move to solidify European-led initiatives. Citing R2P raises ethical concerns, highlighting the need for transparency, diplomacy, and careful consideration of long-term consequences.