The Supreme Court has granted certiorari and accepted the case of President Trump arguing presidential immunity from prosecution for official acts while in office. At the heart of the issue the court will determine if the charges brought by Jack Smith need to be dropped, or if the case against President Trump can continue forward.
If the Supreme Court begins defining what types of immunity exist for Presidents in office, they are beginning to open the door to multiple Lawfare efforts against the chief executive by agencies of the administrative state. This could be extremely troublesome for the future abilities of the presidency far beyond Donald Trump.
[SOURCE]
WASHINGTON DC – In a one-page order Wednesday, the court set an expedited schedule to hear the immunity issue, with oral arguments to be set during the week of April 22. In the meantime, proceedings in the trial court will remain frozen.
[T]he court’s decision to keep the pretrial proceedings frozen is a blow to special counsel Jack Smith’s effort to bring Trump to trial this year. Smith has charged Trump with four felonies stemming from his bid to subvert the 2020 presidential election.
Trump claims that, as a former president, he enjoys broad immunity from criminal prosecution for acts taken while in office. Lower courts have rejected that claim, but proceedings in the trial court have been paused for more than two months while Trump has litigated the novel immunity question. (more)
The leftist Lawfare cheerleaders are not happy with the Supreme Court decision.
.
Call me a downer but can’t help but wonder how they’ll be able to rule against President Trump without hurting any other president. Seems the bull’s eye is only on one back.
Murder charges filed against Barry Soetoro aka Barrack Obama in January 2025 over the killing of American citizens in drone strikes!!! 🤔
or Larry Sinclair, and now his private chef
And treason for spying on his successor.
this^ an impeachable offense.
impeachment of a former president by congress? never going to happen. But IF we had a morally good and stable set of people in power in DC, it would have been already tabled.
the great game of pretending continues
the reality IS …? they all enjoy the benefits of the secret police spy state.
God Bless America
Good luck we didn’t even bring articles of impeachment for this, probably because Bush jr did the same type of shit.
Not to mention Biden beibg arrested for murdering an innocent family of eight in the aftermath of his failed Afghanistan withdrawal debacle!
Except the corrupt DOJ won’t bring charges against any Democrat president. So who brings the case? A local Republican state AG?
Trump 47 DOJ could very well choose to if no immunity is the decision! 🤔
Apparently any DA in the country can file charges?
Actually an AG needs to file them now. You can guarantee the immunity question gets resolved real quick.
Exactly. File charges against Obama for one of his multiple crimes. Apparently any DA in the country can do this.
How about the execution of Ben LuLu? Extra-judicial, or what? First degree murder. Of course, we know for a fact that the CIA has been doing this since at least 1954 under the guise of “national security.” I don’t believe I have seen that phrase in the Constitution as part of the definition of Presidential responsibilities or powers.
The problem is who will go after BHO or Biden? Look at Biden’s handling of classified docs, clearly illegal, and yet he is not charged. But Trump, who had Presidential authority and kept docs secure, is charged! SCOTUS can’t help us if the law is ignored (student loan forgiveness for example) or not applied equally. Trump has to win in Nov. and start powerwashing on day one.
They won’t be able to.
My prediction is a solid 6-3 in favor of Trump (remember, 5-4 and Thomas writes the majority opinion), with a possibility of a 9-0 decision in favor with a squishy Opinion, 1 concurring opinion by Thomas and Alito and a second by the liberal 3.
Trump’s attorney’s have pointed out in fillings that Barry order the killing of an American citizen on foreign territory and Bush’s lying to Congree about WMD’s. That can of worms won’t be opened. The liberal concurring opinion in a 9-0 will be full of some hypotheticals to leave the door open for future challenges, but they won’t open that can.
I agree! Also, President Trump’s lawyers will be better prepared to answer the hypothetical question of…”if the President orders Seal Team Six to assassinate his political opponent would that be protected?”
Obviously, looking into blatant election tampering and fraud has an OFFICIAL NEXUS to a President’s sworn duty to “take care that the laws are enforced” vs outright murder of an opponent where there is no threat!
You mean like the NYS civil suit against President Trump’s NYS businesses?
when will the court hear that? They probably won’t and say there’s no standing.
Just another lack of education of those who watch fake news. Civil and Fraud cannot be in the same basket. Ask any lawyer and they will tell you that Fraud is a Criminal case. You cannot have a ‘Civil Fraud’ case. It’s a joke.
I don’t know how they can here. I think this is very, very positive. And maybe I’m reading too much into this, but recall that Smith originally sought review in the Supreme Court. He wanted to skip the court of appeals. The Supreme Court wouldn’t take it. The whole process of it getting back to the Supreme Court now resulted in significant delay, which means it’s harder to schedule the trial before the election. The Supreme Court had to know that when it declined to hear it initially, since it knew the case would be coming back at some point, so that suggests a majority of the justices don’t want the DC trial to take place prior to the election because they didn’t want the Supreme Court to be seen as involved in the politics of all of this insanity. That’s a good sign.
SCOTUS was also likely hoping that the appeals court would make the right and easy decision. The Supreme Court shouldn’t have to straighten out all of these lawfare types of cases. They’re probably hoping some/any lower court will help them out so they don’t have to overturn a half dozen Trump cases and appear politicized in Trump’s favor.
I hope you are right. I’m not a lawyer.
All I know is I pray for President Trump.
We LOVE him.
Trump 2024
Looking even further, if they rule against “Presidential Immunity”, how would they be able to defend the immunity for ANY government official, AG, AD, judge, etc. . . . including themselves ?
While it would be nice for “We The People” to be able to keep those officials accountable (think of the parents of Laken Riley being able to sue Biden; Mayorkas; the mayor of Athens, GA; the judges and DAs from Texas and NY who played a role in releasing the murderer; etc.), it would mean chaos for our beloved country.
Maybe that chaos is exactly what we need to clean house, install righteous pro American Republic people, enforce the anti-communist law, and avoid a civil war (which would be way worse than chaos) to boot.
If the last 8 years haven’t been chaos-it’s surely been a precursor.
A dem POTUS won’t have a 95% dem-owned federal government agencies coming after him. Only a GOP POTUS will.
That’s why Kavanaugh and Coney-Barrett will side with the Roberts left wing to take Trump out.
Comments about this is what JS wanted. It gives him standing. Keeps it in the news cycle. Etc. These are all true, but remember this is the result of a thoroughly corrupt DC circuit court that ruled against Trump then stayed their own decision until SCOTUS acted. Maybe I’m getting my cases mixed up. But anyway, it needs to be resolved. In a perfect real DC court, the comments would be correct, but corrupt courts need to be set in their place.
Smith has an absolutely DISMAL record in Supreme Court cases and I believe he has been on the end of a couple of 9-0 losses in the two cases that have been heard in the USSC!!! This is NOT WHAT FJB, GARLAND AND THE DOJ WANTED TO SEE HAPPEN WHICH IS WHY YOU SAW THE MELTDOWNS AND HISSY FITS FROM THE MSNBC CROWD!!! 😆
If “This isnot what,…wanted to see happen,..” then WHY did they select Jack Smith as the guy to improperly appoint as the Special Council to prosecute these cases?
Gee, do you suppose its because they never had a goal of actually winning in Court, and their goal all along was ONLY election interference?
The ONLY way it makes sense for them to appoint Smith, who clearly does NOT meet the legislative requirements, is that it was INTENTIONAL, and would give SCOTUS an “out” without having to rule on the merits of the case.
Unless you “buy” that they really WANTED to successfully prosecute and even imprison PDJT, and in their eagerness, not ONE of the thousands of lawyers and paralegals working at DOJ, bothered to READ THE STATUTES, and check to make sure Smith was qualified, in order to insure their case would not be dismissed”on a technicality”?
Maybe “Smith” got picked because of all the dirt they’ve kept covered
up on him from when he was in europe. “Pay to play or get jailed” shakedowns/
decisions.
I think that dutchman might have it right. The big boys knew that there
probably wasn’t a chance that it would make it every step of the way.
The important thing was to have many, many, many indictments. And a willing
and complicit press to have wall to wall coverage about it. So that the lo-fos,
non-discerners could have evidence to support their Trump TDS.
Smith might have agreed to what’s happened since he came onboard because
they basically have a gun pointed at his head to do so.
That’s why they brought 4 criminal cases. There is a good chance that any case like these won’t get to trial before the election. They wanted at least 1 case to go to trial prior to November, so they filed 4.
I think Smith is just a stupid ideologue.
You have noticed that the Left/DS has not put forth their A-list attorneys to prosecute these lawfare cases, they assigned them to bottom – feeding political hacks.
If it doesn’t make it to trial, the Democrat and anti Trumpers can continue
believing the allegations are true. And the Defense won’t get their chance to put forth
their version of the truth.
“…do you suppose it’s because they never had a goal of actually winning in Court, and their goal all along was ONLY election interference?”
The Democrats have become rabid lunatics since 2016 (they were already lunatics pre-2016 but not quite rabid) and they are going for the most desired outcome of their efforts. They’d be happy with whatever worked to weaken his dominance in the presidential race.
I am guessing they did not believe Trump would remain as cool and as in-control under such extreme and blatantly false charges, nor did they likely anticipate that his polling numbers would rise instead of fall, much less rise as significantly as they have during all of their transparently fabricated and outrageous Lawfare attacks on him..
Hmmm, you are getting quite warm here! As Sundance says lawfare is more for media and shaping public opinion!!! 🤔
Yep! Although if they can finagle a conviction out of a raft of lawfare charges they are that much more ahead. Case in point -the J6 prisoners and convictions. They were all Lawfare’d by a combo of the DOI (U.S. Department of InJustice) and the People’s Republic of the District of Columbia.
Have you noticed that all of the prosecutors going after Trump are “sketchy” and don’t appear to be best choices for going after a former president with cases that good lawyers probably wouldn’t take?
Did they pick marginal people by design, or are these crazy people the only ones they could convince to go after Trump?
Were these people considered expendable if things went awry?
I suspect that in the cities where Trump will get convicted no matter what, the prosecutors reflect the community and aren’t the greatest. I suppose they also could have picked some high income zip code with a good prosecutor, but there’s more of a risk of at least one juror holding out in those jurisdictions, as political views of people in them aren’t 90-10 in favor of the radical left.
It occurred to me that they were preselecting the Grand Jury, now we know that was happening in Georgia.
If you want to figure out JUST how corrupt a given elected or
appointed official is, pay close attention to their appointees.
Do they come from places where things continually seem to go “wrong”?
That’s not incompentence, that’s corruption.
Do they have some accusations that you don’t have to dig very deep to find?
Almost guaranteed.
The reasons for the last 2 questions? The politicians are damaged goods.
They know that, their new hires ( who will get absurd compensation) know
that. Damaged goods likes to hire damaged goods. They pay them well to
look the other way.
It appears to me that none could have passed their SATs.
See my response to Meow4me2 above.
Answer: These people like Garland, Weissman and McCord are not really as smart as they present themselves!
Most of their success in school, law school or later in the courtroom was the result of ethnic nepotism or only having to try cases in front of friendly Bolshevik judges.
BINGO, BINGO, BINGO!!! 👍
The answer as to why Jack Smith was articulated by Dean Wormer of fictional Faber College . . . “put Neidermeyer on it, he is a sneaky little s–t” referring to Douglas C Neidermeyer the ROTC asshole of Animal House.
two percent: That would be Douglas C. Neidermeyer, Sargeant at Arms.
Going to watch Animal House now.
This is not about the law, per se, and never has been, that’s a sideshow. This is preeminently about the optics, to so soil Trump’s image that the thought of him wining the nomination, let alone the Election(!) would be seen as laughable, as when he first ran for the office, to the almost universal derision of the state media. Not that they wouldn’t love to see him behind bars on something! But they’d likely, as they would realize in their saner moments (few though those be) guarantee him the election then.
One thing the Marxists didn’t count on is the utter inability of the state media organs to manage the narrative, with the proliferation of alternative media, such as The Treehouse.. Too many people have been informed of the truth and have turned that former derision on the corporate media itself and regularly discounts anything proceeding from it as more state propaganda. That’s why you see the constant bumps in popularity for the president after each indictment – if the media applauds it then he must be innocent, because they’re as corrupt as it gets.
Jack was brought in because he’d indict the proverbial ham sandwich and try to make it look like it was guilty of grand theft auto. He’s a loose, rabid hound let loose to ravage, politically speaking. We’ve never had a nominee under indictment before, let alone the cyclone of lawfare that’s been thrown at Trump. But still, there’s the president, golfing, laughing, defiant and sure of himself – those are optics the lapdogs of the state media simply cannot counter. Their problem is that Trump really is not guilty of anything they’ve thrown at him and he doesn’t remotely act as if he thinks he is. He’s not apologetic out there, as former establishment Republicans would normally be. The American public picks up on that and their anger, far from being directed at Trump, is being whipped up against the corrupt and lawless system that persecutes him.
I agree, they thought they would’ve got Trump to either give up or tank his poll numbers by now……..they under estimated his support with real people.
What surprises me is how sloppy and at times undisciplined the FJB/Garland DOJ are compared to the hatchet men/women Barry Soetoro had in the Holder/Lynch DOJ who enacted the RUSSIA, RUSSIA , RUSSIA HOAX AND ALMOST GOT AWAY WITH IT!!! 🤔
They thought that we’d drop him when he made the
“Grab her by the …….” comment back before 2016 .
You are assuming they are smarter than YOU!!! They never wanted this to get to where it is now! They wanted another Bob McDonald case, former Virginia Governor whom smith got a guilty verdict but was then overturned 9-0 on appeal!!!
at some point the meese brief enters the room…and that “could” (emphasis) impact former SC actions and outcomes.
I understand your view and it’s a fair and respected one. But I believe (bear with me), that DOJ/Corruptors have been doing this for a long time. (unlawfully prosecuting cases with minor attorneys). I believe they have done this and installed jackwagon because they want to continue to inch this all the way to scotus and make it the new normal that a minor unconfirmed (senate) attorney, can prosecute all the way to POTUS. So imho, it would seem that DOJ has a multi head hydra program in concert with lawfare. to blaze new legal territory and claim it.
remember what the DOJ/FBI/CIA/HOMELAND/NSA/DOD REALLY IS. It IS the secret police spy state. It seeks the power to control and influence ALL powers in the US and abroad. Advancing and winning these two unparalleled cases would be enormously successful for the stazi to capture more power and exert itself across the entire strata.
those being: the senate can no longer be the final filter to determine if an attorney may prosecute all the way up to POTUS (which includes ALL OFFICERS OF GOVERNMENT!). And of course the case of reversing the constitution and remanding the President of the United States as not really the final executive and commander in chief, but limiting that power to the very real chilling conditions that at any moment and for really any reason, real or manufactured, the secret police state can spy on him/her, capture/seize records and staff, leak salacious bed wetting, and go immediately into court in DC (on a daily basis if needded), with sealed secret material and get a dc court judge to begin criminal prosecution of a sitting president…or ANY OFFICER of the US Government.
that is what is one the menu. That is what I believe the next stage of power the secret police seeks.
just my own opinion
God Bless America
Sadly, I think you’re bang on.
I wonder who operates this emerging rogue government monopoly. Who sits at the center of this power?
As W might ask: “Who is the decider?”
Wow, dude!
I think we have a winner!
Ummm, the problem is that you cannot in the instance of immunity, have one set of conditions for the Congress and the Judiciary and a second set for the executive!!! That WON’T WORK!!! The USSC will render a decision that the President has the same immunity as members of Congress and the Judiciary! Fortunately, we have sane Constitutionalists in the majority and not five or six Kentaji Brown Jackson’s! The whole apparatus currently in power, everybody agrees, is the same apparatus that controlled the Executive Branch from 2009 – 2017 and is basically Obama’s third term but has come out and shown its full blown MARXIST TOTALITARIAN tendencies!!!
It’s pretty darn easy to get your cases mixed up. It’s a lot, and they want it this way.
Judge Erogon looks like Weissman’s father and Garland looks like his uncle. They have to come from the same family because…
No three people could be that ugly by simple happen chance!
The Devil’s Rejects.
Unless they’re inbred from the swamps and back-woods of Deliverance.
“dey be squealin like a pig”
Deliverance of Columbia.
This is pretty close to the TRUTH.
Lot’s of in-family political breeding and incest going on there.
Quite a few of Ukrainian ancestry too.
More likely the backwoods of Flatbush, Brooklyn!
Erogon resembles an evil troll from a Middle Earth trilogy.
Like something out of Lord of the Rings!
“My Precious, my precious”, says Smeagol Engoron, aka Gollum Engoron.
Inbreeding in their community is a real thing. I used to live in NY. At first I was shocked when I met couples that were married to their first cousins. They were surprised that I was shocked.
I think he looks like an older Jame Gum, the freak show from Silence of the Lambs that kept his victims in the well! “It put the lotion in the basket”
The argument they need to make is that immunity ensures that Federal employees cannot prosecute a President who refuses to obey their direction. In effect, organizations without Constitutional standing – the Executive branch is One Person – would have veto power over the President.
Most of the Dept of Justice’s case rests on the testimony of former employees who insist they told Trump the election was legitimate. In effect, they are claiming the President is required to listen to them. He is not.
That is the danger. Not some future prosecution while out of office, but prosecution by Federal employees while in office. It would be a nightmare.
They really don’t have any choice but to say the POTUS has the same immunity as members of Congress and Federal Judges!!! This has never had to be set in stone because no one up until now was INSANE enough to try and force the adjudication of this but we are dealing with Marxists so there are no guard rails when it comes to SANE practice!!! 🥴
I agree that it’s stupid on a lot of levels. I’d like to see them argue that the “special council” laws are unconstitutional as well. Defang the #resistance by eliminating one of their favorite Lawfare weapons.
The SC statute also makes it possible for DOJ to obstruct Congress by claiming any matter they don’t want sunlight to expose is “under investigation”.
I hope SCOTUS burns this case to ashes. I don’t trust them, but I can certainly hope they do.
They have qualified immunity but the POTUS does not?
Good catch.
And this is the ridiculousness of all of these cases, of scampeachment #1 and #2. They are all about the President doing his job the way he sees fit and other people pretending he can’t do what he’s doing because it doesn’t fit their world view.
Who cares. You are un-elected peons.
Not to mention that the President of the United States could be arrested and prosecuted at the whim of every County DA in the country once leaving office!
It would destroy the Office of the President one of three branches of the United States Government and the established concept of federalism.
Maybe that is their plan.
Except for Alito and Thomas, do not trust these justices. The law, the constitution, nor common sense occupies no parts of their belief systems. If it did, we wouldn’t be where we are now.
I believe that for some of them (Roberts, Barrett, Kavanaugh), the beliefs in the law, constitution and common sense are there. But, they are compromised.
Roberts possibly has a skeleton in his closet that he wants to remain hidden, while both Kavanaugh and Barrett are scared for their safety.
Still, I think that allowing the President of the United States to be indicted and prosecuted for actions on the outer perimeter of his official duties…is a bridge too far for even Roberts. ACB and Kavanaugh are weak and will do whatever Roberts does!
While the Dims argue that Trump was only interested in “overturning “ the results of the election on 1/6 Trump is charged with enforcing all of the laws as President and his political fortunes were certainly tied to the outcome. Both of Trump’s positions can be true at once.
🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸
@mrddmia
Important thread.
It shows the Biden DOJ and DC federal courts are violating Trump’s normal appellate procedural rights and deadlines.
This is transparently election interference.
The DOJ and courts will lose their legitimacy with half of Americans.
Then lose their funding.
Cont. (Linked thread)…
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1763223053826437322.html
They lost their legitimacy a long time ago.
Stay with me.
Part of me hopes they find that Trump can be charged because they say his actions pertained to his campaign not his official role as President. WE KNOW THAT IS BS.
But, that means all of the Lawfare work that the Biden team is coordinating with the States is also campaign related and Trump can go after Biden and every frigging one of them and charge them with RICO violations related to the current Biden campaign
Each that Democrats!
Folks, don’t jump. I do see the point here….but that’s if he has a decent DOJ. We will be lucky if he roots out the cancer and gets 2-3 good ones at the top of each department.
I will be reluctantly “satisfied” if he roots out corruption in government. Then maybe go after former folks.
Good point. But a boy can dream…
Lawfare likely has insurance. If there is an ongoing case or investigation, Lawfare will find a judge to claim the president is obstructing justice if he tries to replace anyone even remotely connected. No replacing DOJ, FBLie, Homeland security, or anybody because the legal proceedings or investigations are ongoing.
Just transfer everyone in the FBI at the DC office to Guam.
Of course, there’s the danger that the island may tip over.
I love it when lawfare an the media are crying in their boots. I hope it floods DIM salt tears in New York and California and D.C. where the swamp reigns supreme. It will save us a lot of time.
April has always been an important month in United States history- American Revolution begins at the Battle of Lexington; first blood of the Civil War; also Lee’s surrender at Appomattox in April; Waco siege ends with the burning of the Branch Davidian compound; OKC bombing.
It will be nice if we can see the United States Supreme Court issue an April ruling ending Lawfare in all its manifestations.
Don’t forget tax day also occurs in April – that one is very dear to Military-Industrial Complex 😂😂😂
Left-wing scumbag kooks on a left-wing kook network owned by Comcast. I got rid of Comcast years ago and good riddance.
Wow, TDS^2!
Anyone up for doing a “services rendered” audit on Madcow? And throw
Isikoff and Colbert in on the deal.
See what any of the above’s net worth prior to them pushing “Russia, Russia, Russia!”,
and then see if there was a Yuge bump in their net worth afterwards.
Curious what kind of scooby snacks got thrown out to these lying dogs.
Haha, these people are insane…
Remember kids, narrative before sanity!
Worrying that Trump would never, ever leave office once elected for fear of prosecution? Like a screen door laying in the back yard after a hurricane, she is completely unhinged.
Imagine if immunity is not upheld then this scenario can happen to every future President all day everyday.
Mr. President my DA’s will file criminal charges against you and your family members if you don’t do what we say……………..
By the way what is the statute of limitations for murder and mass genocide? Because if this is not upheld and PT wins I can imagine AG Paxton going immediately after a few ex-Presidents with criminal charges while PT pardons himself and unfortunately there won’t be anyone to pardon these ex-Presidents.
Turnabout is truly a bitch!
The goal of the globalist owned uniparty and the administrative state is to usurp the constitution. So far they are unopposed. Way ahead of schedule.
I don’t think Barrett, mck, or roberts have the balls to make the correct ruling. They are too scared of leftists.
The Supreme Court has been awful , a running joke , but even worse for women, Ruth was stright up evil ,actually all of them have been absolute embarrassments Sandra Day … obese Soto,pro death catholic can’t even make proper food choices, evil and devil Jihadist Ocultist Criminals, . Amy was good on Dobbs but was crying for poor Floyd ,. Women in American politics have been no better, even Elise Stefanik let comey off the hook ,frightened . The nutty bartender, Sheila Jackson Lee, on and on, Collins ,Snow ,throw up ,.
Women judges, women politicians a running joke.
Unfortunately, that experiment has not gone well!
The Founding Fathers were right.
Oh, please! Some women are idiots, just as some men are idiots. Some women are savvy, intelligent thinkers, just as some men are. Then there’s the vast middle in between. Let’s not fall into the trap of blaming “the women” for the downfall of the Constitution. There’s plenty of men who helped with that.
some … seriously … their all idiots … women are useless …
When Roberts plays politics with the SC no one is happy. Left is not happy, not soon enough, and I heard Mike Davis on War Room and he said this is politics because there was no reason to expedit. Roberts is the worst SC Justice in history. I feel sorry for Clarence Thomas…he has to work with this very small minded man.
We had our warning about Roberts years ago. This one just hit me.
.
The way to tell if a “conservative” or “republican” is bad news is easy.
They either receive neutral press, favorable press, or escape being criticized.
I call it the Johnny Isaakson rule, because he never got slammed, and he was
useless.
Anyway, anyone else remember the article in either Time or Newsweek when
Roberts was appointed? It was absolutely fawning, to the point that I thought
they’d give him a centerfold picture opportunity.
Beware of any and all Repubs that get good press.
“Eyepatch McCain”, anyone?
Michael Steele is a classic RINO scumbag. Naturally he’s found a home at MSDNC. He and the cotton-headed buffoon lawyer still seem to think that a speedy trial is the public’s right. It’s the right of the defendant to petition or to waive. Nobody else’s.
I’m confused. Former President? I thought what was at issue here stemmed from when he WAS President? (which any school child can tell you he did nothing wrong, but I guess I’m in dreamworld. Hm, maybe nightmare clown world.)
I’m not trying to be silly, but I think sometimes that this really is an alternate reality. The obvious constantly gets overlooked.
Obvious questions that never get asked.
How is it that 5-6 different States election officials stopped counting on election night?
How can a sitting President Insurrect against himself?
WTF, CO2 is PLANT FOOD.
IF they were serious about these Lawfare cases against PDJT, WHY would they appoint such clowns as prosecutors, guaranteeling the cases will not be successful.
WTF, Covid is not lethal in 99.9998% of cases, according to THEM, so WHY would we need a vaccine?
HOW could Hamas have built an underground city, and then planned the Oct. 7 attack, right under their noses, without anyone noticing?
Russia vs Ukraine,…you gotta be kidding!
Exactly, obvious questions…
Shaping the narrative, and nobody is willing to simply speak the truth. Well, almost nobody, 🙂
There are those speaking truth, but they are censored.
How about the same way we knew little about the vast underground system of the Viet Cong until way too late?
It wasn’t our territory no more than Gaza was for the Israelis.
Be certain the SC is captured and compromised therefore illegitimate.
Ultra-MAGA!
Jonathan Turley feels SCOTUS wants to find a “middle ground,” that not everything a POTUS does will be immune from criminal charges.
Naturally – that’s a safe bet for Turley – he actually means Roberts / not SC – but it better be a high bar to breach – like killing your mistress in the Oval Office or something like that – Any other ‘lesser “ actions should be protected by Immunity(sarcasm?)
They will likely ‘split the baby’ as they often do.
I don’t know who this guy is but I see his name a lot – not sure if his thought has any merit or not:
Bill Cernovich? D***head.
Given what the Biden Regime has done; permanently changing our nation for the far worse in addition to who knows how many deaths, a crime wave and an invasion, to start with– knowing that he never even won and that well over half the nation never voted for anything even approaching what they’ve done.. geez, whatta think should happen???
What should happen is Biden and his handlers should be hung for treason.
The office of President and any former President will be granted full immunity for any actions they took including illegal acts and should only be held accountable by the Congress. The President is President 24/7 until 12:01 on the day a new President is sworn in.
There will never be any Trial in D.C. or Miami as both are just flat out unconstitutional and election interference.
The Georgia case is never going anywhere.
The NY Bragg trial is their weakest case and will end up being dismissed at some point.
The Carrol cases will eventually both be overturned during Trumps 2nd Term.
The James case will also implode based on the 8th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Trump will win despite Biden being forced to not run for re-election and Newson and Rice will be defeated.
We are watching a slow moving miracle right in front of our eyes.
It will be the famous photo of the lady in green screaming time 10…..lol…..
Just watched Trump’s border visit on RSBN, you would never know he is going through such turbulent times. He is so focused, while he’s at the border he is at the border. Standing out in the open giving a speech, probably with the Cartel watching from across the river. Cool as a cucumber.
During his speech he threw shade at Gavin Newsome, he said “New scum because that’s what he is scum.” Trump never misses a beat, that’s our President.
From what I read, Thurgood Marshall already sorted this one.
Somebody buy McConnell a Tesla.
They really do work underwater, heh, heh…
That is a real Plaid, BTW.
‘Nobody is coming to rescue us, it’s on us now’: Andrew Weissmann
Weissman freaks out that the Supreme Court agrees to hear President Trump Immunity Appeal!
It’s great plus read the comments!
Hunter Biden deposition transcript.
Live by lawfare, die by lawfare. The courts are not supposed to operate on a political calendar.
Of course they want only the presidency to have accountability/ liability. Congress exempts themselves from that. And SCOTUS is insulated because of majority decisions. A clever way to destroy our form of government. The President must have immunity.
Federal judges have immunity from prosecution and must impeached.
I’m thinking this would open the door for many past sins: Afghanistan, Benghazi, Libya, Waco, and on and on and on and on.
I’m very sorry I didn’t become a litigator or investigator when I was much younger! The demand for decent attorney’s and their support staff is going to skyrocket!
Ann Vandersteel and others are studying common law and are beginning to serve notice to government “officials” who are lawbreakers:
https://rumble.com/v4bmd3n-the-peoples-operation-restoration-lets-take-back-our-country.html
Exactly! The Lawfare Crew are really as smart as their grandparents constantly told them!
These Demonrats are both evil and stupid. Their efforts are blunt and obvious political persecution without even an attempt to.present a serious case. It seems likely that these “Hail Mary” efforts were promulgated simply in a arrogant attempt to sully President Trump in the eyes of the voter. Is reeks of desperation as they panic over the future loss of power that Trumps cadidacy embodies.That moronic endeavor has increased the strength of his favor among existing supporters and expanded his support among minorities. People don’t like unfair treatment to anyone especially when it is so obviously just devious political BS. The most detrimental aspect if this is the Pandora’s box of destruction opened that vaporizes what little trust the citizens had toward politics and democratic processes and the parties that practice them. In their evil arrogant attempt to maintain and increase their own power the Dems have pushed the nation right to the brink of chaos. Pray that we can find a way back to a more sane governmental construct with sufficient honor and transparency as envisioned by our founders without the violence and destruction that lies before us if these evil efforts cannot be controlled and reversed by the voters. I’m not optimistic about that heartfelt desire. This was always the unavoidable result of the continuous concentration of power in the federal government that has been proceeding since our formation as a sovereign collection of states.
perhaps the biggest ruling in my 75 years…bigger than abortion.
SCOTUS will disappoint.
Yes, Andrew Weissman is not pleased, according to the Gateway Pundit.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/02/andrew-weissmann-after-supreme-court-agrees-hear-trump
I’m not pleased that the seditionist Herr Weissman is not only free but fears no consequences for his numerous crimes. He doesn’t have the decency to lay low but instead trolls us on national media.
Not giving a President immunity for lawful acts while holding that position is one way to
CONTROL any President. President Trump did nothing wrong.
Trump 2024
SCOTUS is essentially now kangaroo…legitimate decisions vs politicized lunacy is what we have, with the randomness sowing distrust for them as well as all the other venues of authority and governance and information we distrust.
I am not quite sure why there is this disconnect between the moments when we know all typical efforts are corrupt and therefore the people have to unify and rise; and this repeated default to looking at these corrupt venues for rescue .
Do people toss a coin each day to decide who they will trust to save the nation?
We can only trust ourselves.
So the phrase jury nullification comes to mind here. If we the people, the ultimate jury on this government, determine that the actions of this government are illegitimate, including the court system, then we will simply nullify the judgement. I will vote Trump no matter what, I will work against these illegitimate pretenders and marxists, and I will fight for my country. I will not lay down just because the Supreme Court said so. Courts can and do make mistakes, including the SC, and especially under Roberts.
Biden’s unconstitutional and deliberate opening of the border has incited mass violence against American citizens. For that, Biden and his deputies need to be tried for criminality, sued, and impeached.
Why isn’t every Red state bringing up charges against Biden and his minions?
Look how Steele sits there like an idiot while the clown on the right sounds ridiculous. SAD!
In ruling against immunity, it opens all former Presidents to prosecution. Specifically Obama for murder of an American. He may have been a terrorist, but US law say he gets a trial and cannot be summarily executed vigilante style. He was targeted.
I still cant stop laughing @ the melt down of libtards aka: the morally mentally and emotionally bankrupt who disengage from reality crybabies…..Special shoutout to the insane Keith Olbermann a special kind of nutjob.
The SCOTUS ruling will be something like this. All past and future Presidents have and will have full Presidential immunity except for Donald Trump. Because Orange Man Bad.
Trust a court that refused to give standing to states with a fraudulent election, not in this lifetime.
In any corporate embodiment, its President has unalienable authority to declare policy and conduct a variance per the authority of the president. That can be delegated down the power chain, but the authority to conduct a variance in operations or commission of presidential duty cannot be erased from the President. It’s unalienable.
And in Trump’s case, what he did as President he also does as Commander In Chief. The dual office vested in one human person is the superior executive trustee of the national interest, free to act with according immediacy and operational finality.
Institutionally, it’s the only way it can function and endure the realities of the office and the world.
I’m waiting to see John Roberts on the Epstein list that is about to be released.
John Roberts is complicit in affirming the corrupt judges and their decisions.
Seems to me that the court has shown their hand in the way they framed the question.
“Whether a former president enjoys immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct ALLEGED to involve official acts…”
Should it not be;
“Whether a former president enjoys immunity from prosecution for ALLEGED criminality during the performance of official duties”
It does not need to be proven that he was acting in an official capacity. Whether anything he did was criminal is what should need proving.
FBI and the UK have launched all hands on deck panic raids to seize servers linked to a ransomware outfit that breached Fulton County Government firewalls and threatened to release data “that will affect the 2024 election”.
https://krebsonsecurity.com/2024/02/fbis-lockbit-takedown-postponed-a-ticking-time-bomb-in-fulton-county-ga/
Mr Hunter Biden did you ever feel paranoid and schitzophrenic when high on smoking crack. Did you ever peek out the window all night or suffer from voices or loud noises outside sure someone was out there or under the house. Most crack users have admitted besides sex visions and perversions paranoia was the most annoying symptom of staying high for days. Do you see why it is against the law for a person like that to own a gun as they may shoot someone they percieve as a threat but really a paranoid episode. Did you wave the gun around loaded or were you considering suicide. In any event purchasing a pistol when under the power of cocaine and paranoia must seem to you like the rest of us a highly dangerous decision and should carry a severe punishment and just pure luck no major violent event occured. Yes your honor I see why and need a little prison time. Guilty as charged…