Three main points before getting to the substance. [213 page opinion HERE]
#1) It was a 4-3 decision. Meaning it was the politics of the court, literally the political makeup and perspective therein, that determined the outcome of the decision. This is showcased in point #3, which is the funniest part.
#2) The entire framework of the case against Trump in the Colorado decision is predicated on this: “[the complainants] asserted that he was ineligible under Section Three because he engaged in insurrection on January 6, 2021, after swearing an oath as President to support the U.S. Constitution.” [pdf, page 6] REMINDER – President Donald Trump was not charged with “insurrection,” is not accused of “insurrection,” does not fit the complaint under the definitions of “insurrection,” and has never been found guilty of insurrection. The complaint is moot before the court. But hey, it’s Lawfare… and we all know Lawfare is created for public media consumption, so that takes us directly to the biggest point.
#3) Instead of me writing it, let me screengrab it so we can all laugh together [pdf page 9].
Wait, what?
Yes, that’s correct. As long as President Trump appeals the decision to the Supreme Court, the appeals court stays their own ruling – essentially indefinitely. The Colorado primary ballots printed, and the primary election will be over, before the Supreme Court puts this on their docket.
In addition to the virtual guarantee the high court will overrule this political nonsense, SCOTUS can make the entire issue moot before them by following their own normal schedule for submissions, arguments, deliberation and opinions delivered by the court.
The Colorado appellate court knows this, that’s why they put this self-stay into their 4-3 ruling. It’s a politically correct way of giving the optics of telling their tribe, ‘hey we’re with you,’ without the ramifications of the political backlash. In other words, psychological lawfare stuff – intended for media consumption.
Making the issue that much better for Donald Trump, the efforts of the Prescott-Bush clan (look it up – they live in CO) will backfire bigly. The public backlash against a judicial ruling that interferes with the right of the citizens to determine their own election candidates plays perfectly into the sunlight operation against the Lawfare left.
This backlash will be epic, albeit hidden by MSNBC and the rest of the insufferable media. Why? Because it doesn’t fit the Lawfare narrative.
I’m not even going to highlight the nonsense from the leftists who are in a frenzy over this one. Just smile, pretend it’s the end of the world, eat your favorite foods and live your best life while trying not to laugh. Seriously, this is just that level of goofy.
Remember what I said about Ron DeSantis in 2022, and everyone looked at me funny. Well, this is way more predictable than me saying DeSantis will collapse in sunlight.
That said, Vivek Ramaswamy is not silly, and he sees a great opportunity.
VIA TWITTER – This is what an *actual* attack on democracy looks like: in an un-American, unconstitutional, and *unprecedented* decision, a cabal of Democrat judges are barring Trump from the ballot in Colorado. Having tried every trick in the book to eliminate President Trump from running in this election, the bipartisan Establishment is now deploying a new tactic to bar him from ever holding office again: the 14th Amendment.
I pledge to *withdraw* from the Colorado GOP primary unless Trump is also allowed to be on the state’s ballot, and I demand that Ron DeSantis, Chris Christie, and Nikki Haley to do the same immediately – or else they are tacitly endorsing this illegal maneuver which will have disastrous consequences for our country.
Today’s decision is the latest election interference tactic to silence political opponents and swing the election for whatever puppet the Democrats put up this time by depriving Americans of the right to vote for their candidate of choice.
The 14th Amendment was part of the “Reconstruction Amendments” that were ratified following the Civil War. It was passed to prohibit former Confederate military and political leaders from holding high federal or state office. These men had clearly taken part in a rebellion against the United States: the Civil War. That makes it all the more absurd that a left-wing group in Colorado is asking a federal court to disqualify the 45th President on the same grounds, equating his speech to rebellion against the United States.
And there’s another legal problem: Trump is not a former “officer of the United States,” as that term is used in the Constitution, meaning Section 3 does not apply. As the Supreme Court explained in Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (2010), an “officer of the United States” is someone appointed by the President to aid him in his duties under Article II, Section 2. The term does not apply to elected officials, and certainly not to the President himself.
The Framers of the 14th Amendment would be appalled to see this narrow provision—intended to bar former U.S. officials who switched to the Confederacy from seeking public office—being weaponized by a sitting President and his political allies to prevent a former President from seeking reelection. Our country is becoming unrecognizable to our Founding Fathers. (read more)
I mean, c’mon man. Have we forgotten when Trump won the Colorado primary in 2016, and the delegates all promised to vote for Ted Cruz at the convention anyway.
The Colorado GOP is Prescott-Bush. Nuf said!
This is all silly Lawfare.
This illegal case has been the sole focus of Bannon’s War Room today.
Sigh.
He had that dipshit Dershowshit on, and I immediately turned it off. If I have to hear one more time from Dipshit that he has the right to not vote for President Trump, I may throw up.
Same talking heads weekly spewing political BS.
Dersh says this is a travesty, it’s illegal, and it will be overturned. All the things we already know.
…and then always follows up that he hasn’t and never will vote for Pres. Trump. Cognitive dissonance or douchebaggery, you decide.
Yeah … and when it’s overturned 5-4 including Robert’s dissenting opinion that takes the opportunity for multiple shots at Trump and his anti-Democracy MAGA thugs (sic) … the left will moan about Trump’s EXTREMIST right wing court … and demand the SCOTUS be expanded to 22 Judges.
Alan Dershowitz has stood up for the principle of Trump having the right to not be persecuted for his opinions, of having the right to a trial, the right to run for President. He defended Trump during one of his impeachment trials. He has, at some personal cost to himself, defended Trump when he does not agree with some of all of his political ideas. I admire him as he is one of the few people, either liberal or conservative, who values and defends the Constitution and individual rights in a principled way and has put himself out there. Has Dershowitz some contradictions in his mind, if he still wants to vote for a Democrat? Yes. But no worse a contradiction than the ones I observe in the pro-freedom writers on this website, who state they are for individual rights but think it’s morally right for the government to have the power to tell an individual woman if and when she can have an abortion.
Dershowitz lost a lot of democrat friends back in the day giving positive feedback regarding President Trump so I have him applauds most of the time. No, government should not have the right to tell a woman if she can or cannot have an abortion. However, that same government should not be helping to pay for it. If a life means so little to a person then at least bear the burden of its murder.
The simplest and most effective argument about abortion is also about the covid jab.
We may not like it, but SOME people will choose it. Some will not.
When it comes to your body, it should be your choice.
If your decision is immoral, you’ll go to Hell. Maybe someone will try to help you see the light….
Most women who have an abortion might stop carrying a child, but they then carry a guilt for the rest of their lives. That cannot be fun.
But as a man, it’s not in my bag to carry.
Wrong! Getting the jab may only kill yourself. A portion is murdering an innocent
The shot is really is the govt approved assisted suicide.
If a woman can’t kill her child after it’s born, what gives her the right to kill her living child
before it’s born? She could have chosen to prevent her pregnancy in the first place and she didn’t
The laws of nature are what they are. No one has the right to kill a live human child.
We are not animals.
Re your first paragraph, and your final sentence… we are, in fact, animals, with respect to what results in pregnancy… although one hopes our animal brains take control at crucial times… not always easy.
Actually, we are made in the image of GOD.
You were doing really good … right up until you advocated MURDERING a living child … because mommy’s boyfriend left her and she no longer want to “keep” the kid. You know nothing of RIGHTS … human rights. I guess that makes you … inhuman. And frightening.
Why is murdering babies so important to democrats? Since you are unaware, abortion is a 10th Amendment issue. States have the right to determine what is best for their state. If you believe in abortion and “after birth” abortion, whatever that means, and chopping up baby parts and selling them, you are free to live in that deranged state. That’s how state sovereignty works.
I have come to truly despise that man.
Douche is a coward.
Frankly, the more one knows about the lawfare issues, the better one can be prepared. I am watching Bannon right now. dersh being on to give legal insight to the stupidity of the CO issue is OK. He is obnoxious. But no harm.
Douche’s biggest problem is that he sees the flagrantly illegal/ unconstitutional activity that come from his own party and it really bothers his conscience. But he will never leave that party because all of his friends and colleagues are in that party and he does not want to lose them. Plus he doesn’t want full retribution from the left. Like Jesus said: “For they loved the praise of men more than the praise of God.”
Well it should be. That’s what the democrats do, they stay focused. Fighting the good fight must start.
Analysis I received from a Democratic lawyer in Colorado:
‘The Supreme Court will now have to take up this case. I predict they will NOT disqualify Trump based on an historical interpretation of what was meant by “insurrection” in the post-Civil War context.
‘The reasoning is likely to be something like: “Insurrection meant attempting to overthrow or reject the authority of the entire federal system of government — executive, legislative and judiciary included. Attempting to influence Congress in certifying a single election involving one office of one branch of government — even the office of president — does not constitute trying to overthrow, or deny the legitimacy of, the entire United States government, as the seceding states attempted to do in an armed rebellion.
‘When Trump urged supporters to march on the capitol, he implicitly recognized the legitimacy of Congress’ authority over the electoral college voting system, even if he later continued to question the legitimacy of the result reached by the Congress.”
‘That’s quite a stretch, IMO, but I don’t expect this Supreme Court to have the courage to reach a different conclusion.’
Except for his final sentence, he seems to be on the right track.
Thanks for sharing the foie gras talking point we are all to be fed
Colorado Supreme Court Justices Defend Trump: ‘There Was No Fair Trial’
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://www.newsweek.com/colorado-supreme-court-justices-defend-trump-there-was-no-fair-trial-1853968
I expect this to be reversed and remanded per curiam, without opinion.
It needs to contain severe criticism of the CO court – I fully imagine the SCOTUS is fed up with the ‘lawfare’ baloney they keep having to deal with and the politicization of our legal system.
I wholeheartedly agree. The justices who voted for this travesty need to be shamed
Thank you, Sundance, for posting the CO ruling.
Have I told anyone I hate roller coasters? 🤣🤣
Had enough yet?
Thanks for clearing this up. Enlightening
I had heard of the bush-nazi connections but had not read anything much until the article linked. Thank you Sundance.
I have read the crazy “stay” written by the same nameless CO supremes. What on earth? I know…it not going to do what they want.
Even fetterman has been more about the Republic than the socalled republicans.
Times are serious. Thank you Sundance…going to enjoying the several days. Will be renewing hourly thanksgiving and praise for the soon to be birthday of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ! Be well, God Bless.
They have to keep the distractions at a high level from the thousands of military age males coming across the border. No women or children!
Bad Kitty, Censored By X🦁🤐
@pepesgrandma
🔥 CREW, the folks that got Trump pulled from the Colorado election ticket once shared the same address as Media Matters.
Media Matters is a Soros Democracy Alliance Aligned Partner Organization (APO).
And look, there’s Noah Bookbinder sharing that same address as Media Matters.
This stuff always seems to disappear from my searches. So I recreated it. 😝
Cont reading…
Jeff Carlson
@themarketswork
It’s the same Brookings/CREW characters over and over again.
Cont reading…
Three tribe members. Curious.
The Soros-asses need to be fully revealed to the American populace as the Nazis they are!
The entire SOROS funded created crowd across our country should face actual Constitutional “legal challenges” and then pay extreme penalties for their crimes of past 4 years. State AGS who have violated (blatantly) LAW should be disbarred if not imprisoned.
Surely some team of MAGA lawyers have enough skill and courage to be the spearhead for such a fair and deserved challenge….after Trump is elected. We can’t let these scum back.
The protection is a court that isn’t littered with communists. Unfortunately, Colorado is an embarrassment on that front.
Thanx Dem’s, your desperation has just increased my love for Bad boy Trump even more…lol!
And
Dan Bishop’s full thread (mentioned in Jeff Clark’s post)…
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1737381851398889747.html
Vivek saw an opportunity, or was just playing his part in this latest example of political narrative theater?
The goal is to get Pence 2.0 in as VP.
Since Vivek cannot serve as a president, how then can he even become VP???
Obama skirted the situation so Vivek can certainly cite precedent. The Democrat commies will go nuts but if Trump wants him on the ballot the courts won’t interfere.
A mistake (allowing Obama to run) cannot be a precedent for allowing the same illegal action again. Good grief.
That horse left the barn in 2008.
That horse needs hauled to the glue factory.
If we put up an ineligible then the Left goes nuts, and helps us prove the illegitimacy of Zero.
Zero is and was as illegitimate a usurper as Biden, we should be as eager to undo him as his puppets.
Excerpt:
What I thought was interesting 👇👇👇
🚨ALL of the dissenting judges graduated from University of Denver Law School.
💥ALL of those who signed onto the ruling went to Ivy or old guard East Coast schools (Harvard/Yale/UPenn/UV).
If Gilliani can get fined $148 million in a defamation lawsuit by government employees, I wonder what President Trump can get with a case against the actions of these Marxist Judges.
Greta Van Susteren
@greta
Why do you think the Colorado Supreme Court, which had 4 voting against Trump remaining on the ballot , and 3 voting for him remaining on the ballot issued the opinion without naming the author justice? Why must we guess who in the 4 was the author when all 4 agreed? #transparency is lacking
7:54 AM · Dec 20, 2023
Maybe they didn’t want to put their name on the court decision for fear of plagiarizing the CREW report, if you know what I mean. (Sarcasm intended)
The same reason people who scrawl foul things in the highway restrooms don’t scrawl their credit card numbers, phone numbers, emails, or addresses.
At the very least, anybody still undecided has to be questioning their positions on everything. I don’t think there is a great number of these people, but I’m sure some do still exist. The lines of battle have pretty much already been drawn. These people will never stop. I will never stop fighting them, as long as I draw breath. This is The Good Fight. Freedom ain’t free.
Trump is now ‘MORE likely to beat Biden’ after Colorado ruling: Top pollster says controversial state Supreme Court decision will lead to a huge surge
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12885509/trump-beat-biden-colorado-disqualification-supreme-court-decision.html
We have to recognize that these communist democrats are attacking American’s constitutional rights. This ruling is no more silly than the Governor of New Mexico’s direct assault on the second amendment or the incarceration of j6 protestors without due process.. These actions are deliberate attempts to chip away rights and substitute government edict. This must be dealt with forcefully as negotiation only allows another chip in American rights.
The only people calling the Stop the Steal rally on Jan 6 an “insurrection” are the traitors who planned violence and decided to label it an “insurrection”.
When in history did the perpetrators of an insurrection show up armed only with national flags?
Stop the Steal was the wolf in sheep’s clothing which lured Trump supporters to the Capitol area. Trump organized his rally much later and held it at the other end of the mall away form the Capitol.
Just a quick reminder that the United States Senate held a trial in February 2021 and found Trump “not guilty” of the insurrection charge brought forth by the House of Representatives. An impeachment trial supersedes some Podunk Colorado district court and its phony findings. The CO Supreme Court cannot overrule the US Senate.
So it’s just dumb on a lot of levels. The reason it is important is that really the lawfare thing has spun out of control. SCOTUS – as effectively the head of the Judicial Branch in this country – is going to have to do something it is loathe to do: spank these courts (all of them) mercilessly. Not just this bananas CO ruling, but the documents b.s. and the J6 b.s., too.
These bizarre cases are threatening the stability of the entire Judiciary. Who is going to obey the law in a world where the law is just some random Democrat lawyer pushing a phony set of charges through a Democrat judge and then you get banned from society or put in prison for…literally nothing other than “We don’t like you.”
SCOTUS needs to step in, not because this has any legal merit, but because it does not and because there is no need for a “court system” in this country if they keep this up. Nobody will listen to the courts and people will stop participating in the process (think “Jury Duty”). WTF would I agree to participate in a legal system that allows this level of insanity? Why would anyone?
Trump’s Second Impeachment: How the Senate Voted – The New York Times (nytimes.com)
Because “jury nullification “. That’s why.
Everyone should desire to participate, and some or most cases require “jury nullification “.
Learn it, love it. It will send the Dems to their safe spaces 😂
Why is anything regarding this being discussed, the appeal will be filed at the SCOUS before Friday, automatically nullifying this non ruling. All these yahoos in the press and legal analyst waxing on about this garbage should be sacked and stuck working at Slurpee Heaven for the rest of their lives.
Yes. Throw raw meat out to distract everyone from the real agenda which is Tillis’ legislation to nullify the States and Electoral College – control all elections at the Federal level
The biggest point. WHICH is the Communists want to overwhelm SC and the USA to collapse it = the Cloward–Piven strategy
so..ummm….can we get five registered republican voters in colorado to file a petition against the state election official to remove joe malarkey from the ballot? kamala? newscum?
joe malarkey is involved in corruption
kamala harris is involved in stupid. that IS a crime…it’s a disqualifier to be that stupid.
newscum – he violates hair vaseline limits…that’s a crime. a felony.
and lets not stop there
we start a petition against disaster…FEC violations, improper use of campaign funds for personal travel.
same with nikki haley….horse face penalties.
krispy kristie – donut smuggling is a crime
and then we turn our attention to the colorodo scotus black robes.
apply pressure on colorodo state assembly to impeach them all.
Colorado is some respects is worse than califormia and dc. it’s a very liberal legal state. clean on the streets, but crooked and very corrupt.
can we find just 5 good men and women to stand up and start a petition and do a counter attack?
time to start fighting back.
I kinda hope they go back to the caucus system. I’m no longer a Republican so I can just ignore it. Makes you wonder, though, whether the Bushies want a caucus system so they can wreck Trump like the Democrats did to Bernie in Iowa…
Seems sorta sus, no?
I don’t trust this response any more than the provocation that preceded it.
I’ve taken the hint and am arming up.
Sundance sometimes you are just too 100%
How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_many_angels_can_dance_on_the_head_of_a_pin
“How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?” is a phrase that, when used in modern contexts, can be used as a metaphor for wasting time debating topics of no practical value…
Like fretting over partisan US politics in an over-the-hill banana republic and surveillance state?
Trust Colorado’s Secretary of State, y’all.
Their elections are fair. She promises.
Is she the one who persecuted the elections registrar in Mesa County, Co who had verifiable proof of election tampering?
Thanks. Now I can’t take an afternoon nap.
El Salvador President Becomes First Global Leader to Push Back on Colorado’s Fascist Move to Remove Trump from Ballot. Nayib Bukele
@nayibbukele
The United States has lost its ability to lecture any other country about “democracy”.
He should know by now that the lunatics in this country have redefined “democracy” to mean that only they win and only the candidates they approve of will be permitted. The lecturing will continue unabated because the lecturers are insane.
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
True…. but I want to play with my boat and 4-wheeler…
Pretty much what I said to my wife last night.
Another lawfare traveling through the pages of history by way of ancient catacombs to find that one piece of probability minute law to harass President Trump. Wonder if one of those sitting daily scouring through pages ever check the Bible. Soros has paid well ever since he’s been here to destroy our country. The last number of years has been through laws. Guess owning the senate wasn’t enough.
Larry Schweikart
@LarrySchweikart
Rich Baris
@Peoples_Pundit
is absolutely correct.
Anyone (you listening DeSoros? Nick Knack? Steve Deace?) who is not taking a stand against CO’s illicit Cupes is
COMPLICIT in this tyranny.
12:23 PM · Dec 20, 2023
johnny maga
@_johnnymaga
Ron Desantis just said the decision to remove Trump from the ballot is all part of an elaborate plan to ensure he becomes the nominee
Cont…
That may, indeed, be the plan…
But that is why it has to be made to backfire on them with a big explosion right right back at them.
Everything they are doing to Trump they could do to any other Republican candidate that rises as a threat to their power structure. Every single one of them.
They could simply do hit after hit on candidates until they leave you with their approved republican candidate for you to kindly accept and vote for.
H3ll no. We do not comply.
The article is posted at Right Scoop aka the Cathedral of DeSantis Worship. Interesting comments. Nobody but DeSantis could twist this into a “poor me” campaign ad for himself. Yikes!
Dumb and Dumber continues his charge towards oblivion!
These people are paranoid suicidal psychopaths, I mean DemonRats. What are they afraid of?
Their crazy like Hillary Clinton. They do not fear Trump, they fear the American people (deplorable’s) and what is really crazy, they continue to do what is making them fearful.
‘O’ Well, they deserve what is going to happen to them in the future!
They’re crazy…
The decision by the all-Democrat Supreme Court of Colorado to remove Donald Trump from the ballot is among the most undemocratic and unconstitutional rulings that I have ever read in my 60 years of teaching and practicing law.
If I’m not allowed to vote for President Trump, then I am no longer going to comply with anything this government says. That includes taxation. If they come for me, so be it. I’ll be ready.
I’ve started a thought exercise of renouncing my citizenship.
THE POINT IS – 25 STATES HAVE, OR TRYING, TO DO THIS UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACT.
It’s clear that this measure was never intended to turn the enforcement mechanisms over to individual states and their courts. (Above) Justice of the Colorado Supreme Court
They broke the ice in the outhouse, how many will follow them down?
Texas Lt. Gov. Suggests Removing Biden From ’24 Ballot After Trump Ruling
DM – ALAN DERSHOWITZ: Colorado’s unconstitutional anti-Trump judicial power grab will trigger Republican retaliation and plunge the 2024 election into chaos
By Alan Dershowitz
Published: 13:13 EST, 20 December 2023 | Updated: 13:25 EST, 20 December 2023
The decision by the all-Democrat Supreme Court of Colorado to remove Donald Trump from the ballot is among the most undemocratic and unconstitutional rulings that I have ever read in my 60 years of teaching and practicing law.
The 4-3 judgment purports to derive its authority from Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which was enacted after the Civil War. The measures were designed to prevent individuals who had engaged in the insurrection and rebellion of 1861-1864 from running for certain political offices.
But authors of the 14th Amendment never intended for it to be used to deny voters the right to decide who their next president would be in all future elections.
To the framers of this amendment that would have been utterly ridiculous.
Consider the historical context of the 14th Amendment’s passage.
At the time, United States included confederate states that had recently been put down by force.
Why would the Congress have wanted to empower the former rebel states? If given the power to boot candidates off the ballot they might well do mischief.
In fact, the 14th Amendment explicitly provides that ‘The Congress shall have the power to enforce by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.’
It’s clear that this measure was never intended to turn the enforcement mechanisms over to individual states and their courts.
The decision by the all-Democrat Supreme Court of Colorado to remove Donald Trump from the ballot is among the most undemocratic and unconstitutional rulings that I have ever read in my 60 years of teaching and practicing law.
The decision by the all-Democrat Supreme Court of Colorado to remove Donald Trump from the ballot is among the most undemocratic and unconstitutional rulings that I have ever read in my 60 years of teaching and practicing law.
It’s clear that this measure was never intended to turn the enforcement mechanisms over to individual states and their courts. (Above) Justice of the Colorado Supreme Court
It’s clear that this measure was never intended to turn the enforcement mechanisms over to individual states and their courts. (Above) Justice of the Colorado Supreme Court
TRENDING
What happens next after Colorado judges booted Trump off the ballot?
8.3k viewing now
DOJ subpoenaed for allegedly SPYING on congressional aides
623 viewing now
Trump is ‘MORE likely to beat Biden’ after Colorado ruling: Pollster
24k viewing now
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12886511/colorado-court-trump-alan-dershowtitz.html
VIA TWITTER – This is what an *actual* attack on democracy looks like: in an un-American, unconstitutional, and *unprecedented* decision, a cabal of Democrat judges are barring Trump from the ballot in Colorado. Having tried every trick in the book to eliminate President Trump from running in this election, the bipartisan Establishment is now deploying a new tactic to bar him from ever holding office again: the 14th Amendment.
Dear Vivek, they have not tried every trick … as yet. The nuclear option is now on the table. May God watch over and protect President Trump and his family.
Hi, Sundance. Do you have any thoughts on the CO GOP saying “Fine, we’ll just have a caucusb instead”?
The shamelessness of these Democrat judges proves their lack of personal character. Only gigantic aszholes do this kind of stuff, and these democrats ARE aszholes. Every damn one of them should be disbarred. Democrats are scum, to suggest otherwise is not even an intelligent conversation.
Lt. Gov of TX:
So Trump wins a Colorado Republican primary easily. But now I’ve read that, in response to Ramaswamy’s comments, the Colorado professional Republicans may decide to ditch the primary, and caucus instead. So I wonder: do the Prescott-Bush operatatives think they’re organized well enough to defeat Trump by controlling the caucus process in Colorado?
FJB publicly called President Trump “an insurrectionist” today in response to a reporter’s question. That’s defamation pure and simple.
FUMING PILE OF TOXIC WASTE FROM COLORADO, THANK GOODNESS FOR THE VIDEO
MOUNTAIN HIGH” MUSIC VIDEO
May the wrath of hell be delivered to you shortly, you swine.
The Reckoning 2024>25.
Please Diagram with Your Own Brief Subnosis:
1.Trump Win with democ-rino-Rats reactions, Consequences (include BLM/Antifa again?)
2.Trump Loss, from Rigged sElections and Consequences.
3.No sElections. due to CW/WW/ etc.
BREAKING REPORT:
Dave Williams, the chairman of the Colorado GOP tells the ‘
State Supreme Court to “Go F*ck yourself.”
I couldn’t have said it better ..
LIVE YOUR BEST LIFE!
It’s Christmas Time – Music Travel Love ft. Francis Greg, Dave Moffatt & Anthony Uy
MUSIC VIDEO