I say this discussion is disappointing, because it was heavily recommended to me. Unfortunately, it is another regurgitation of the Potemkin face of the Deep State without hitting the main arteries.
Overall, it is a good recap of people and events that most readers here are familiar with. However, on the segment of “naming names”, the key names are never mentioned. Kash Patel discusses the ‘functionaries’ and who they are, but never actually explains who the people are that guide and steer the functionaries.
The most obviously missing name is a little discussed woman named Mary McCord, the singular epicenter of every DC construct to remove Trump, including: the 2016 DOJ-NSD FISA submission, the 2017 White House coordination (Rice, Ruemmler, Monaco), the 2017 targeting of Flynn (w/ Yates), the 2018 Schiff/Nadler impeachment, the 2018 FISA Court review as an outcome of IG Michael Horowitz, the installation of ICIG Michael Atkinson, the changing of CIA rules for whistleblowing (impeachment predicate), and currently the 2023 Jack Smith investigation. Mary McCord is the binding guide. [Mary McCord’s husband was in charge of the counsel to Chief Justice John Roberts.] The second most obviously missing name is Dana Boente, who followed McCord, then worked with Comey, then jumped to the FBI to assist Director Chris Wray.
When asked about how this all originated, Kash Patel skips over the most glaringly modern evolution, the Patriot Act, formation of the DHS, creation of the ODNI and the construct of all the mechanisms currently used for domestic surveillance. Then again, Kash Patel was in control of Devin Nunes’ information flow as lead funnel to the HPSCI Chairman.
If you are a deep weeds walker, watch this with interest (I did), and you’ll likely walk away with ‘suspicious cat’ questions about Kash Patel. WATCH:
.

I have never seen him promoting Q. Beck I agree with you on.
Patel in his book actually gives a comprehensive list of people that should be investigated and punished.
Anyone with a book deal makes me twitchy; I like Kash but take him with more than a few grains of salt.
I don’t care about Kash. I care about The Constitution.
Umm, I don’t think it is Kash that you need to be wary of but the guy who was interviewing hm!!! I wouldn’t get into much specifics with Beck either!!!🤔
I’m not sure it’s fair to expect Kash, Nunes, Ratcliff, or Trump to spell out all they know about our opponents and those who are at the nexus of their evil designs. That would give them an edge.
Trump once said, “People can’t know exactly what your intentions are. You want to have a certain amount of, you want to have a little bit of guess work for the enemy. I don’t want to broadcast my intentions”
Vito Corleone, “Santino, come here. Whattsa matter with you? I think your brain is going soft from all that comedy your playing with that young girl. Never tell anybody outside the family what you’re thinking again!
Why do you put ANY stock in Glenn Beck? We know that he is not who he says he is…it has been circulated that he is on the dark side.