After years of assembling datapoints around the potential for the Supreme Court to be compromised, it was the discovery of Mary McCord’s husband Sheldon Snook deep in the office of Chief Justice John Roberts that finally sealed the deal for me personally. Yes, the Supreme Court is compromised.
Quick Context. Mary McCord was the architect of all Trump targeting efforts. The FISA on Carter Page, the weaponization of the DOJ-NSD, the installation of Michael Atkinson as Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG), the companion to Sally Yates in the Flynn targeting, lead staff for the Schiff/Nadler impeachment effort, later appointment by FISA Presiding Judge Boasberg to be amicus to the FISC, in combination with Chief Justice John Roberts holding authority over the FISC, and the discovery that Sheldon Snook, McCord’s husband works in Robert’s office as “special assistant to Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.’s counselor. The counselor’s office advises the chief justice not only on the management and budget of the Supreme Court but also on his interactions with the executive and legislative branches, along with numerous other public roles in which Roberts serves.” (link)
Mary McCord is the fulcrum point for all of the above issues. She connects all of the targeting operations. Mary McCord is the center of it, and John Robert’s office is compromised by the appointment of her husband Sheldon Snook. So, this story below does not surprise me.
Special Prosecutor Jack Smith jumped over the appeals court and asked the Supreme Court to decide on President Trump’s position of presidential immunity for his requests to secure the integrity of the 2020 election while in office. In the fastest turn around time in history, the Supreme Court [Robert’s office] said yes, they will hear the arguments.
WASHINGTON DC – Special counsel Jack Smith is urging the Supreme Court to urgently resolve Donald Trump’s claim that he’s immune from prosecution for charges related to his bid to subvert the 2020 election.
Without the Supreme Court’s swift intervention, Trump’s trial could be indefinitely delayed, the special counsel warned in a petition to the high court on Monday.
That’s because the trial, scheduled to begin March 4, is effectively suspended while Trump pursues his appeal of the trial judge’s ruling rejecting his immunity arguments, Smith wrote. Resolution of the novel legal question is necessary to ensure the case proceeds “promptly,” he argued.
By coming directly to the Supreme Court, Smith is hoping to bypass a federal appeals court and is mounting an aggressive bid to keep the timing of the election-focused trial on track. If the March 4 trial date sticks, it would be the first trial for Trump in the four criminal cases he is facing as he mounts a bid for re-election to the White House.
[…] The justices acted quickly on Smith’s motion. In a brief order Monday afternoon, they directed Trump’s lawyers to respond by Dec. 20 to the prosecutor’s request for the Supreme Court to add the case to its docket for this term. (read more)
There’s your inflection point timeframe.
The executive branch wants Trump on trial by Super Tuesday, March 5th the main primary election date. The legislative branch wants to extend warrantless surveillance, the mechanism to exploit the Trump supporter targeting operation, through April 19th. [Patriots Day 👀]
There’s the 2024 detonation timeframe, between March and mid-April.
Elon Musk herds all the MAGA groups and “domestic violent extremists” into the Twitter stadium. All seats are filled by March. Boom, everyone scrambles. Thousands of subpoenas released as part of the metadata hit list.
I was trying to reply to Libby, but twice my comment was deleted in mid-creation. Any explanation for this?
Maybe you should explain your comment to Libby, first?
Not sure, what’s up?
Okay, I will try it again. Third time, enemy action.
Marshall was a highly- place, “stay-behind” partisan for the Federalists, the people who brought you the Alien and Sedition Act. Censoring, prosecuting, imprisoning. With the aid of his fellow Federalists on the Court, he moved to deny the Democratic Republicans their right to staff appointed positions with their own people…more “stay-behinds”… despite the Executive being in the hands of the Democratic Republican administration of Madison.
Like the judiciary of today acting to obstruct Trump’s action during his term, and in the follow-up to 2020 to obstruct or refuse to hear challenges. Hard for me to take Marshall as a salutary example given the similarities.
There was more, but we’ll see if even this précis gets posted.
It’s posted.
As for Marshall and his points of the Marbury vs Madison case, which is what matters to me, is in the fact that constitutions are the creation and therefore the constraints upon the government created.
All laws repugnant to that constitution are null and void.
It is a simple fact.
I align anti-federalist and am not a Federalist (Roman “Ruler” Law) type of person, but I can still use what is law and constitutional even iff proven by someone I may not agree with and have called a traitor to his face.
Just saying.
This was just a reaffirming of the true constraints upon a government by the standards within it’s constitution/Compact/Contract.
Without the constitution there is no government as it was and is the constitution. What is left is a criminal cartel of enemy combatants that have attacked the country and the people all at once.
Hence, by the consent of the people, we have a criminal cartel of enemy combatants within the government and positions reserved for Representatives.
Ex parte Milligan 71 U.S. 2 (1866)
“Neither the legislature nor any executive or judicial officer may disregard the provisions of the constitution in case of emergency …”
Likewise lays out the case of treason and the traitor by the constitutions.
If it’s true for emergency usurpation, it is true for any usurpation.
“Section 98 therefore, anyone who declares the suspension of the constitutionally guaranteed rights (travel, worship, earn a living, peacefully assemble, [vote], etc.) and or attempts to enforce such suspension within 50 independent, sovereign, continental United States of America is making war against our constitution(s) and, therefore, we the people. They violate their constitutional oath and, thus, immediately forfeit their office and authority and their proclamations may be disregarded with impunity and that means anyone, even the governor and President.”
As for the Alien Sedition Act.
They are all treasonous because there was never a need to suppress/censor/censure speech as it is a violation of the Constitution First Amendment and therefore a direct attack against it, the country, and the citizenry.
But then, the Federalists kidnapped Southern Statesmen at gunpoint to force a quorum for their version of a constitution. Which forced the creation of the anti-federalists (Who NEEDED to hide their identities against attacks) Statesmen that refused their presumptuous elitist attitudes and decided NO USA was better than their version.
That opened James Madison eyes BIG League.
Got to run, but that is the thing.
What is true is true.
Even if i do not like the messenger and would have possibly called him out for treason. These were fighting and dueling words that held meaning, unlike the compromised p*ssies we have today.
Best of luck, and know truth has no agenda.
Thank you, Libby.
Libby, The quote you mentioned, “Neither the legislature nor any executive or judicial officer may disregard the provisions of the constitution in case of emergency,” is often misattributed to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the Ex parte Milligan case of 1866. However, this attribution is incorrect.
Ex parte Milligan did address certain constitutional rights during the Civil War, but it did not include the statement you’ve quoted. The case was primarily concerned with the legality of trying civilians in military tribunals when civil courts are open and functioning. Furthermore, the claim that government officials who suspend constitutional rights in an emergency must immediately forfeit their office is also not supported by this case or any other Supreme Court ruling.
Additionally, in 1866 we did not have 50 states.
i attended a meeting back in 2013 and the speaker had inside knowledge of happenings at the United Nations building. It is the same UN that many do not know or understand. It is where the enemy of the USA meet to discuss way to destroy our Constitution.
Yes, they hate the notion that we are/were a government that answers to the people. We are the only such functioning government in the world and they despise it. They aim to bring us fully around to a Dictatorship of some kind and they want all of the citizens and non-citizens to be nothing more than peasants! Controlled peasants to be more accurate. They have come a long way in achieving that goal over the past 10 years.
Klaus Schwab and his billionaire club promote this notion as well.
sato422, that seems to be clear for those who are paying attention. Unfortunately, about half the American population isn’t paying attention.
I have had recent issues too with disappearing post, sluggish typing responses ..as if there was a layer of hidden surveillance going on. ????
Hidden surveillance was, indeed, my suspicion, too.
I had a text that I was compiling today to two others sitting ready to post when I had to for a few minutes let it lie. When I shortly returned, it was gone. I visit dissident right and alternative media sites, so maybe that has caught the Eye of Sauron? No telling for now. Once is chance, twice is coincidence, third time is enemy action.
I’ve had similar experiences, but always attributed it to my own clumsiness or slow internet service or glitch in service. Will pay attention and start documenting these experiences. Maybe send a log to the admin email
I’ve only experienced the delayed response typing at The Burning Platform. They have The Man With No Name for cyber security. No disappearing posts ever, so far.
President Trump needs ruthless, cutthroat lawyers on par with that Thug Jack Smith.
Not sure he has them but pray for their wisdom and success.
Pray for SCOTUS to do the right thing.
And continue to pray for President Trump!
Pray for America!
This is all too insane!
Wouldn’t it be Loverly if Scotus awoke from their deep state sleep and did the right thing?
President Donald Trump is immune from this prosecution. Take your toys and go home and stop prosecuting your political opposition.
This Epoch Times article notes that Jack Smith has not had much luck with Scotus in the past.
“He also noted Mr. Smith’s poor record at the high court, which he said “has not been kind to him, including by handing down a rare unanimous rebuke when the Court overturned him 8-0 in the McDonnell case,” in which Mr. Smith prosecuted former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell.
President Trump’s campaign reiterated his belief that the prosecution is politically motivated.
“There is absolutely no reason to rush this sham to trial except to injure President Trump and tens of millions of his supporters. President Trump will continue to fight for Justice and oppose these authoritarian tactics,” it stated.”
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/special-counsel-asks-scotus-to-rule-on-trumps-presidential-immunity-defense-5544990?
Just perhaps, I do not know, perhaps Smith is being ‘guided’ by his handlers to exit the case because he cannot win. Turning it over to the Supremes taps into the public’s acceptance of their final word. Resulting in a decision that doesn’t destroy Smith further and moving the charges out of the perceived witch-hunt stigma.
That’s possible!
Interesting…🤔
It’s actually his best play. Smith knows that Trump can run out the clock on his case through the appeals process. Thus, sling a Hail Mary and hope for favor from the Supreme Court.
Roberts is compromised (perhaps via his sketchy adoption of his kids & his trips to Epstein Island). That became evident in his flip flop on Obamacare. When pressed, he votes what his handlers tell him. So, they’ve only got to peel away one more vote. Perhaps scouring the NSA database, they’ve found dirt on one of Trump’s appointees as Thomas and Alito appear to be unpersuadable–a pair of Honey badgers.
As thesunisup notes above, this brings the issue to a head and if unsuccessful, Smith can move on with minimal reputation damage to seek another avenue of attack.
Think the database the political maniacs would use is Hemisphere….no fingerprints
The Supremes have screwed President Trump every chance they get. Including the ones McConnell picked to be appointed by Trump.
As and aside couldn’t help but notice, again, this shrike Mary McCord – Laura Ingraham’s buddy on the Georgetown cocktail circuit. And there’s lots more like them.
Of course goatee-boy Durham was not going to go after her and try to flip her. I think previously McCord was the one who guided Clinesmith to tamper with evidence with Carter Page’s confirmatory letter that had been a CIA asset. It would have great to get her and especially Sally Yates under the hot lights.
With a history/reputation as a flame thrower, however baseless his arguments, Smith is a colossal loser.
So the argument goes…”Does transfer of power take place at the incoming President’s swearing his oath? “If so, isn’t the sitting President then still in office until that point?” I believe the inaugural oath still takes place on January 20, correct? Trump was still President January 6th and entitled to Presidential immunity. So I ask “Why”?” does SCOTUS need to weigh in if not compromised? The Appellate Courts are capable of the stated truth.
They will NEVER do the right thing. They are corrupt traitors to the country. Period, end of story.
Joan,
Well thats certainly your opinion, asserted with vehemence, but with NO attempts to provide any facts to support it.
Reality is, IMHO not nearly as clear cut or one sided.
WE have been clamoring, SINCE R v W, that it be overturned and that abortion be a,”State issue” and now it HAS.
WE have similarly been clamoring to end “Affirmative Action” since it was legally sanctioned, for almost as long,…and now it HAS been.
SCOTUS recently re-affirmed a Constitutional protection of religious liberty.
Thats 3 recent examples of “doing the right thing”.
and the Bolsheviks will obey Soopreme Court decisions??? imo, You put your trust in the hands of Quislings and Traitors. But time will tell and soon, 2024 Decides for all the marbles.
I only say this to pre-pare Patriots for an Even more all out Assault from the Illegal Feral DC Coup gov.
The 1st question being … Who will go quietly into their demise??? Deep Statist DC ? or MAGA Citizens ?
question 2 being, What if neither will go quietly ???
CYA, conduct yourselves accordingly. No one is coming to save you, but You.
The Marbles for me are not political but spiritual. I’m not laying my faith on the chopping block hoping the ballot count is to my preference. Democracy is an essentially a pagan practice as God is not considered, just the whims of man in whatever frame of mind he’s in. Popularity contests are horrible means of selecting leaders.
This too shall end, one way or another. And I’m not giving my marbles to anyone but the Lord.
Have you ever skimmed through Kings or Chronicles? Talk about whims and frames of mind.
Skimmed?
Did you skim it on a whim?
If your neighbor’s house is burning down, do you sit on your porch and wait for the Lord to get the people out and put the fire out?
What happens when an irresistable force meets an immovable object?
WE are about to find out.
Read “Men in Black”…it will open your eyes to the workings of the court.
Joan is part of the planted Whinger Patrol, intended to demoralize Trump supporters.
Part of the CISA-CTIL shock troops.
Another, recent example of “doing the right thing”….
“The New York and California laws both required gun owners to show “good cause,”
or a special need for self-defense, to be armed in public,
a mandate that the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional in a 6-3 ruling in June 2022.”
But, but June, 2022?
Why thats after the Court had become totally corrupted, beyond redemption! (sarc.) and thank you for supporting my position!
Roe v Wade is a Pyrrhic victory for conservatives which is why RINOs cheered it on as it galvanized the left to vote in 2022 and it will play right into the RINO playbook for 2024.
Not sure if the kids who’ll get to live would agree that it’s all that Pyrrhic, but are the rinos whorin’ it out?
You betcha.
Exactly,…also the idea that the Red Tsunami turned into a trickle BECAUSE of abortion, was a yuge psy-op.
Firstly (and I admit I fell for it!) the whole “red wave/tsunami” narrative was pushed by the MSM, relebtlessly for 3-6 months, to play “the expectations game” by falsely building up expectations, to distort the VIEW or the election results i.e. make a win look like a loss, or less of a win due to comparisons to the unrealisyic expectation.
And it was the RNC and Congressional R campaign committees that worked hard to insure MAGA candidates lost.
Abortion had notbing to do with Herschel Walker losing, where Kemp and Ratburger won, for instance.
Correct. Plus a heaping helping of regular old Fulton County voter fraud and from the other Democrat strongholds.
Yep.
Or, the 2022 election was rigged and stolen like 2020 was, and the notion that the abortion Pyrrhic victory was our downfall is just misinformation to make us doubt we are the majority. And yes, the stupid RINOs did cheer it on.
“the notion that the abortion Pyrrhic victory was our downfall is just misinformation to make us doubt we are the majority.”
“…..just misinformation to make us doubt we are the majority.”
Right. On. We have to remain aware of this majority, strongly aware, at all times going forward.
Let’s pray anyway. Special intervention.🙏😇
I think they may have a two-fold strategy in persecuting, prisecuting and trying to destroy the practice (business) of any Lawyer that represents PDJT.
One, obvious goal is to cause good Lawyers to “take a pass” on representing PDJT, which leaves him with the “dregs”…but it also makes it easier for them to insert ‘traitorous’ lawyers that will betray him, just like they did with appointments to his administration.
DT is not beholden to demonic senators with his defense team.
Nope, nor is he a passive client. HE makes the final decisions on every aspect of his legal cases, and has a lot of experience.
And is not known for losing.
Apparently Biden’s “election fraud committee” co-opted all the election law attorneys upfront, so Trump would have not where to turn if he wanted to protest the rank malfeasance in the 2020 election.
Part of their grand strategy, along with the calculated astro-turf power of harvesting “81 million votes” mainly from CA and NY – that were used to gaslight and shut up any 2020 election protests too.
Deep state really, really wants to win and scarf up even more of our tax dollars, for themselves. It is existential for Democrats and their massive government employee unions to win.
Starting after 2000, AS they introduced the voting machines, they simultaneously had State Legislatures make major changes to election laws, ostensibly changes required BECAUSE they were switching to machines.
They put in lots of little “traps and tricks” and in many cases its possible the Legislators had no idea what they were really voting FOR.
And then there are the rules and regs, written AFTER the legislation has passed, and policies and procedures promulgated by unelected buerocrats.
And with what weknow NOW, its rasy to see how much of this legislation is intended to make challenging electiobs very difficult.
Yes.
Elections have been made virtually impossible to challenge, and now they seek to formally criminalized any attempt to challenge them and their election system.
Smith is stupid and blundering hoping something sticks. He is well outside his current mandate and his duties for ethical judicial conduct.
And he will still “win”. With a DC jury and kangaroo court he can’t lose.
Smith would not have gone to SCOTUS if he didn’t already know the fix is in.
He’s not that bright
There are a whole lot of people that are Trump supporters who are being pushed to the wall with nowhere else to go. Then what?
I guess the question is, How much corruption and lawfare and totalitarianism are they, Trump supporters, willing to take?
That’s for us to know and for them to find out.
I lost this for awhile, but recently found it. It strikes to the essence of my own belief. At some point the level of tolerance breaks. The author is unknown, but whoever wrote it methinks couldn’t have summarized it more accurately. Seems the clock sits at 2350 or damn close on the way to critical mass, no? The critical part being established and documented – in abundance.
Tax revolt silly. They are only doing this to preserve their own taxpayer funded paychecks, perks and pensions. For their government make-work jobs.
I think the sooner the better while I’m still able to do my part …
I got pushed to this point about 20 years ago. The one who perpertrated it paid a heavy price. I still swing by his lake house on occasin, it’s in shambles now because of me. I drop a few presents around his property for him to deal with for a year or 2, then I do it again. I asked him nicely to stop when he tried to persicute me and he laughed. He tried to get me fired but I kept evidence of his dirty deeds. I found him a couple years later coming out of the bar by his lake house and I set my vengence upon him with great fury and vengeful anger. He had no Idea It was me. I left him a crumpled heap and walked away. He had to find diffrent work because of his injuries. I prospered.
Here is the source from part two.
I recommend everyone read parts one and two.
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/02/08/a-strange-game-part-two/?shared=email&msg=fail
““You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” ― Buckminster Fuller
Always had a soft spot for Bucky…
When will this trigger a tax revolt – no money, no deep state. Simple as that.
I knew Roberts was compromised when he voted for Obamacare which should have been tossed out in it’s entirety. Roberts also flew on the Lolita Express. Nobody has ever proven or disproven whether the name “john Roberts” on the flight logs is that of the SCOTUS judge.
Ghislaine would know.
Didn’t the POS magically grant himself and the court ‘legislative powers’ to re-write the obamanation of obammycare so it would become a ‘tax’ such that they could ‘bless’ its legitimacy?!
I believe Roberts concluded Congress has the right to pass stupid legislation, if they follow the parameters of the US Constitution.
It falls on the people to turn the bums out who wrote Abomination Care, and so far they have not done this.
He decided what CONgress specifically stated was not a tax was in fact a tax and therefore legal…
been having ALLL kinds of issues myself…….ewww they’re mad!
reply moved
Robert Malone weighs in on the FISA bill also. He was working with the Defense Department at one time , probably has friends who were spooks. The mRNA vax debacle seems to have red pilled him.
Obviously, we cannot trust the people in Intel with this Pandora’s Box of information and spying. This bill reauthorizes the FISA for eight years.
“This bill from the HPSCI would renew the mass surveillance authority Section 702 for another eight years. Furthermore, it would grant new authorities to the intelligence community that have been denied by the courts.
This bill would codify the indiscriminate collection of U.S. citizen’s communications arbitrarily gathered by FISA for use by domestic law enforcement.
This was not the intention of this national security program, and people on U.S. soil should not have their communications collected and used without a warrant because of a loophole. This loophole which enables collection of communications by American citizens should not be codified into law by the US Congress.
The HPSCI bill would expand FISA’s reach to include hardware providers through which people communicate on the Internet, and would greatly expand FISA’s scope. Despite years of public outrage about FISA’s over reach, this bill would re-authorize FISA with no real reforms or new oversight, and would grant them vast new powers which are only partially understood and likely to be broadly “administratively” interpreted.”
wrong thread !
Issues with website
I posted a reply to this comment, but I put it on the wrong comment. lol
Another thought, if you hadn’t posted this here I’d have missed it. So thank you.
It’s a dreadful sign they’re looking to extend FISA. Unbelievably provocative.
I’m glad you posted it here. I think there’s nothing more relevant to current Presidential events than the foamin’ at the mouth desperation with which the President’s enemies are so brazenly pursuing their deadly agenda.
Brazen, poisonous vipers.
And all of the above is exactly why they will pass this horrible bill.
PoliticalObserver provided a link to Jack Smith’s petition. Here is the wording Smith used:
“QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a former President is absolutely immune from federal prosecution for crimes committed while in office or is constitutionally protected from federal prosecution when he has been impeached but not convicted before the criminal proceedings begin.”
Smith’s wording not only presumes Trump has indeed committed a crime, but frames the question overbroadly, purposefully to get the answer he desires, “No”. Of course absolute immunity for ANYTHING is ridiculous. If a sitting President bashed in Nancy Pelosi’s husband’s head with a hammer on live TV, POTUS would not have blanket immunity.
To evoke Sundance’s oft-quoted line from “True Detective”: “You have to ask the right f’ing questions.” Smith is deliberately posing a question designed to be deceptive and serve his game, not to get at the fundamental issue.
The essential questions are: “Do the actions Donald Trump is charged with constitute prosecutable ‘crimes’ when performed by a sitting President?” “Other than through the impeachment provisions of the Constitution, can Presidents be prosecuted for “political activity” committed while they are in office?” If Trump’s attorneys are capable, they will see the trap Smith has set, raise objections, and force the real issues onto the table. I predict that SCOTUS will require all this to go through the complete appellate process.
That is what should be resolved BEFORE Smith kangaroo court convicys Trump.
I hope you’re correct.
For those concerned, you CAN access the many filings BY PDJT’s very capable legal team, in his various currently pending cases.
Rest assured, they have demonstrated they “got this”.
THIS is WHY they ATTEMPTED to Impeach him, AFTER he was out of office, which many people questioned at the time.
That they were unsuccessful, in that attempt is WHY Smith is now trying for “a second bite of the apple” and may well be WHY he will lose in this challenge, to wit; in order to PROSECUTE a President for crimes committed while in office, you must FIRST Impeach him in the House, CONVICT him in the Senate, and so REMOVE him from office, thereby STRIPPING him of his Presidential immunity.
They TRIED to Impeach PDJT after he left office, FOR J6, but were unsuccessful.
And now Smith is asking SCOTUS to give him and “end run” around the Constitution.
THIS is WHY it is totally approrpriate for SCOTUS to fast-track and hear this case, and why they SHOULD deny Smith.
Basically, telling him “go back to CONGRESS, have them Impeach and Convict PDJT, and THEN you can prosecute him to your hearts content, but until you do that,…POUND SAND, cause you have NO Constitutional ,…dare I say it? STANDING to prosecute PDJT for actions he took, as POTUS.
You win your case Dutch. Also, what about double jeapordy?
Does not apply, because Impeachment is a POLITICAL,…NOT a legal process.
Hence, being Impeached in the House (which is really only the equivalent of an indictment and confers no guilt) and then NOT convicted in the Senate does not give him “Double Jeopordy protections per se, but as I argued above it DOES, nevertheless give him Presidential immunity protections.
IF I am reading this right, and Smith stepped on his own d*ck big time, and SCOTUS slaps him down, the whole narrative collapses, as DC, Fla and Ga case all “go away” and all they are left with is the silly NY case.
As a politisation of the legal process, this would be/will be one HECK of a boost for PDJT, vindicating HIM and rubbing his enemies noses in their own poop, like a wayward puppie.
I pray it turns out as you have portrayed, Dutch. Then, hopefully, the NY case can be dispatched as it will lead to a mass exodus of businesses from NY.
On the face of it that’s what I see, too, but this all has a creepy feel to it. Will Roberts sell us out like he did for obamacare? Whatever they owned him with then they own him with now.
Attempting to extend and beef up FISA is a big, provocative tell imo.
I am so glad PDJT has an excellent team of lawyers this time.
I love his BS wording of “while in office” and “impeached but not convicted”. That leaves Pedo Joe and his criminal behavior out of the discussion.
How do we put the questions before the lawyers? Would that be helpful? Does Sundance have such an avenue? Do we possess such an avenue?
WE have many experienced lawyers and even Judges posting comments here, as well as experienced “jail house lawyers” such as yours truly here to give the treehouse effective council.
Jesus. They have their tentacles everywhere. He must have been the guy who leaked the abortion case before the midterms.
All of DC is related in some form.
If you family research on the traitors in DC, they probably all have the same
Grand Parents. Lol
Inbreeding of the elites,…ask ancient Rome how that worked out, or frankly modern England.
Shipwreckedcrew elaborates further on Smith request of SCOTUS:
You are likely to see lefty legal beagles claiming today that SCOTUS should treat the Trump case just like it treated U.S. v. Nixon in 1974, where the Court accepted the case on an application for “Cert Before Judgment” at the appellate level.
The Nixon case skipped over the Appeals Court and had SCOTUS settle the disputed issue without further delay.
SCO Smith has not only asked for that — which is discretionary — he has also asked for an expedited schedule rather than have the matter proceed under normal scheduling and briefing practices which would mean months of preparation prior to an oral argument.
That was also done in the Nixon case so the SCO Smith fans are claiming the same should be done to Trump.
Here are a few problems:
Pres. Nixon was not on trial. The Nixon case was litigation over whether Nixon had to comply with a subpoena for records — the tape recordings of his office meetings. Nixon’s attorneys moved to quash the subpoena, but lost in the trial court in late May 1974.
The subpoena was for use of the records at trial — the trial was United States v. Mitchell, involving the 7 Nixon aides charged in connection with the Watergate break-in. The trial was set for Sept. 1974.
At issue was the trial rights and due process rights of those 7 defendants. The defendants wanted access to the tapes just as Special Prosecutor Jaworski wanted access to the tapes. Nixon asserted “Executive Privilege” and refused to produce them for use at trial. The Mitchell case had already been indicted when the subpoena and motion to quash were litigated.
After Nixon filed an appeal in the D.C. Circuit — BOTH SIDES filed separate petitions for “Cert before Judgement” asking SCOTUS to take up the case on under the same rule that SCO Smith is trying to use. So there was no purpose in briefing whether that was an appropriate step since both wanted it.
Because trial in the Mitchell matter was only 3 months away — the speedy trial rights of the defendants in that pending case were implicated — SCOTUS set it on an expedited basis AFTER its calendar for the 1973-1974 term had already ended. The Cert petitions were filed late May 1974, briefs were filed in June 1974, and oral argument was held on July 8, 1974 — after the Court was done with its other work for that year.
The decision was 8-0 against Nixon — Justice Rehnquist did not participate since he was in the Nixon DOJ at the time of the events in question. There was only one opinion, written by Chief Justice Berger. There were no dissents and no concurring opinions. Even with all that, the decision wasn’t announced until July 24, 1974.
So this expedited process, with both sides agreeing, on a narrow issue of “Executive Privilege” when the due process rights of defendants on trial was at issue, still took nearly 60 days from start to finish — at a time when SCOTUS had finished its other work for the year, and the outcome was 8-0 with no Justice other than the Chief writing an opinion.
So, ignore all the folks holding up U.S. v. Nixon as a reason to think SCO Smith can accomplish his goal of keeping the March 4 trial date — now only 82 days away.
Robert Barnes also states that he believes even if SCOTUS agrees to hear, no hearing could be held before summer.
I sure hope so.
So now we know who leaked the Dobbs decision
Hmmmmmm. Could be.
There is ZERO DOUBT that Roberts is a TRAITOR: https://aim4truth.org/2022/07/12/justice-john-roberts-recuses-himself-for-conflicts-of-interest-with-knights-of-malta/
So is Kavanaugh, Gorsuch and Barrett: https://aim4truth.org/2020/12/12/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-pilgrims-player/
Naturally, all the liberal ones are too. The above research was done on the ones put in place to fool us.
The only person on the Supreme Court I trust to follow the constitution and has any integrity is Clarence Thomas.
Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words tells the Clarence Thomas story truly and fully, without cover-ups or distortions.
You can watch this on Tubi…well worth watching. It only increased my respect for him.
When has Alito ever failed us?
Thomas/Alito/2024
They are both giants amongst pygmies.
As was the late (and lamented) Justice Scalia.
…with a pillow!
“…related to his bid to subvert the 2020 election.”
These people are so cute, I’d have to make them up if they didn’t exist, just for my own amusement. You see, Hillary denying for years that Trump was duly elected, and calling him an illegitimate president until she was blue in the face, was just democracy in action. Trump, on the other hand, going to court and pursuing every legal option to contest blatant and obvious election irregularities was an effort to ‘subvert’ an election for which effort he belongs in jail.
It’s not Kafkaesque, it’s Orwellian, 2 +2 = 5, we have always been at war with Eurasia kind of stuff.
“Woe (judgment is coming) to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!” – Isaiah 5:20
the ‘CREATOR’ has all of this under control …
Quite contrary needs a dirt nap. SCOTUS has an opportunity to delay CW pending election results. How is your H2O and food supply?
Ruby Freeman defamed herself – on video.
Mary McCord?!?
Sheesh, I think staring at a welding arc is easier on my eyes.
I am tearing up with laughter, Noel Skwiot.
Great line.
That’s a man baby!
Per Julie Kelly’s observation, Chutkan continues to say that Trump will be treated like any other defendant, he will receive no special treatment. Yet, with stunts like this and the gag order, they are treating Trump very differently from any other defendant. Actions speak louder than words.
Does DJT have a plan that begins with “I WILL NOT COMPLY WITH UNCONSTITUTIONAL WARRANTS ISSUED BY ANY ROGUE COURT OR ATTEMPTS AT SERVICE of those warrants ON ME BY THE COURT’S OFFICERS.”
The state and all of its officers are out of control. None of them, no, not one are protecting or defending the Constitution of The United States. Sooner or later we’ve got to make our stand. Trump will lead the way or fold. If he folds, what then? Do we allow agents of a rogue state to take us out one by one?
I have suspected something was off when Bush appointed Roberts as Chief Justice when he was put on the court instead of elevating one of the existing Justices to that position. My suspicions were reinforced when they whiffed on Obamacare and fully confirmed when they refused to take up challenges to the 2020 elections.
The only thing the Supremes have gotten right in my recent memory is the overturning of Roe v Wade and Bruen.
Hopefully this signals that the SCOTUS knows this Jack Smith witch hunt is BS and they want to end the charade quickly. However, I’m not holding my breath.
The SCOTUS is pretending just like the rest of gubmint.
JACK to SCOTUS: Need you to rule on when Trump stopped beating his wife.
May they all burn in Hell for an eternity!
Smith is now trying to dump this legal POS he created, on to someone else’s lap.
Let SCOTUS overrule him (or rule in Trump’s favor aka USC -Executive Branch POTUS – favor) This will force Smith to dump this POS case on his own name, with mud on his own face.
Has Techno Fog weighed in on this?
They will likely have one of their home brews do something big. We will all know it’s a false flag but like always. They will have their grand spectacle, just like j6. Designed and planned to fill every TV/radio and social media post for months on end, all the while backfilling their continued claims of threats to their democracy..
Goos fraba
Ghastly looking “woman”
Biden weaponized the swamp creatures at the DOJ and FBI
to go after Trump and associates. This is very dangerous.
This will turn a Republic into a lawless Banana Republic.
The Republic is former. It is a lawless Banana Republic.
So wheres my banana?
United States of Chiquita
But wait…. It gets worse.
♦ Chief Justice John Roberts – As if things could not possibly be more corrupt, now we have the construct of Atkinson and McCord forming the predicate for the impeachment effort. To wit, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts now becomes the presiding judge over the impeachment trial of President Trump.
Mary McCord is married to a fellow traveler named Sheldon L. Snook.
From 2014 though 2020, not coincidentally the timeline of the Trump targeting and administration in office, Mary McCord’s husband, Sheldon Snook, was the special assistant to Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.’s counselor. [CITATION]
As noted by the Washington Post in discussing both McCord and Snook, “The counselor’s office advises the chief justice not only on the management and budget of the Supreme Court but also on his interactions with the executive and legislative branches, along with numerous other public roles in which Roberts serves.” [CITATION]
From 2014 through 2020, Sheldon Snook was responsible for running the office of the lawyer legally advising and counseling John Roberts.
Let me put this another way. The most important guy in the judicial branch, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, has a lawyer to advise and construct the responsibilities of the SCOTUS chief judge, which includes the construct of the FISA court and appointment of judges therein.
As Chief Justice, John Roberts is in charge of everything to do with the FISA court. The guy running the office of the lawyer doing the counseling of Roberts, is Mary McCord’s husband.
Mary McCord, knowingly and with specific intent, lied to the FISA court to support the FBI targeting of Trump. Mary McCord’s husband runs the office which would intercept any communication from the FISA court to the Chief Justice if the FISC had any concerns about the false FBI application. See the problem?
♦ SUMMARY – Now, we go back to where we came in.
Why did the Office of the Inspector General never publish the interview transcript about Andrew McCabe talking about how desperate FBI Director James Comey was to get a FISA warrant?
Why did John Durham never publish those same interview transcripts, but instead simply referenced the existence of the transcript in a footnote?
Follow these questions to their logical conclusion, and you will discover that all of the participants including Rod Rosenstein, Bill Barr, James Baker, Dana Boente, Michael Horowitz and John Durham are trying to protect bureaucrats, who did criminal acts, and preserve institutions from collapse that sunlight would create.
https://americanmediaperiscope.com/durham-report-exposes-fisa-court-corruption/
So basically, Trump’s poll numbers will be higher than ever come April?
its a man 4 sure…
While Smith might win at SCOTUS (he’s virtually guaranteed 4 votes on his side unless he completely botches his argument), if he doesn’t, it’s a win-win for the left. How? Along with abortion, it gives the left another “national” issue to run on: Packing a “rogue” SCOTUS with leftist judges. Whether or not you believe polling data at the moment, the trend lines clearly show the Dems losing ground – especially with young voters who are learning first hand the results of their voting behavior. If the vote goes 5-4 for Trump, the Dems will jump on that calling it a sham ruling made by “Trump’s judges.” Throw a Newsom (he of hair gel fame) replacement of JoeMentia* at the top of the Dem ticket and the Dems may be gambling they can re-energize the youth vote to defeat Trump.
OTOH, this could also backfire bigly on Smith and his merry band of Fascists. If he wins at SCOTUS, and drives for this prosecution to happen expeditiously, there is going to be little if anything to shield him from accusations of political interference. The more they persecute Trump politically, the higher his numbers rise. Again, believe polling or not, the trend lines (which is what I look at instead of individual polls) clearly show the public isn’t buying the BS coming from the fascists.
Where you see win/win for them, I see lose/lose for them.
Well, ee will find out, in an expidited fashion which of us is right.
If PDJT’s poll #’s have climbed in some part, because he was seen as being the underdog, valiantly fighting back against a bully,…what does it do to his popularity, if he is seen as punching out the bully, like Michael J. Foxs “Dad” in Back to the Future 2?
A brilliantly funny and satisfying story… and Dad McFly did very well.
I loved the moment when the first house transformed into the second house that the McFlys lived in…
It could go either way, Dutchman, as I noted. The “win” for them would be to energize a very moribund voting base. The other side of it is that another “national issue” made out of something the left has been hammering ever since the court went 5-4 conservative via Trump can be used as a “reason” why Trump “loses” and a plausible way to hide the coming fraud in 24.
“Mary” has a pretty big Adams apple
Reminds me of Big Mike
Another Baphemot in high office in the Illegal Republic
God help us
I wish Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch would drop the grenade, no not the military type, but legal type that would end Roberts tomorrow!!! I guess we will have to wait for January 2025 for that to happen!!! 🤨
Uh, January 2024, the PDJT INAUGERATION is in Jan. 2025.
Roberts will side with the liberals — and Trump’s man, No-Ball Kavanaugh — will side with them too. (No-Ball is seriously compromised: scared of what Schumer and the dem lunatics will do to his kids)
Sundance. This article, though undoubtedly on point, has evaporated any hope I had left for 2024. All is lost. Sorry, it is truly how I feel. They have out maneuvered us at every turn.
Wasn’t chief justice Roberts on the Epstein flight logs? Or is that just speculation?
Would this not be a prime example for a judge to recuse themselves?
Who recalls Roberts many visits “lecturing” on the Island of Malta especially after he threw the Obamacare decision, or that “snuggling” photo with Ghislane Maxwell on Pedo Island? My sense is he’s blackmailed by the spooks to do their bidding. Wonder what’s in his control file?
Such a bad history. Remember Dred Scott?
On a serious related note, am I the only one that has their device screen crack every time I scroll past that picture of Mary McCord? I have blow through a lap top, tablet and cell phone since this was posted.
😉
Roberts reportedly visited Epstein’s Island of Girl Sex Slaves.
Which surprised me somewhat because I heard he was into boys.
Some say he might have committed some crimes in connection with the adoption of European orphan children.
Sex trafficking, perhaps?
Most of the most powerful people in this country are either sexual predators or enablers or whitewashers of sexual predators.
We cannot be blessed as a nation with these sorts of evil people in charge.
Are the Trumps the Maccabees of America? Or the Martels? (Charles Martel smashed the Moslems at Tours, his son Pepin made the Franks (France, the Low Countries, Germany west of the Rhine) safer and Pepin’s son was Charlemagne, who warred upon pagans in Germany and Moslems in Spain.) Will God the Father give us that sort of family and reprieve? Or will we waste our chances and slide back into complacency and servility?
My namesake fought Al Capone. Capone was a murderer, pimp, racketeer, extortionist, and seller of adulterated booze. In other words, my namesake would say Capone was a much more ethical man than today’s average politico and robber baron like Bill Gates or Warren Buffett.
Justices know, if a proven corrupted loser like Smith actually wins this at SCOTUS, it will be a decision that will historically mark this court as owned by a weaponized DOJ, and will have the enmity of their countrymen until the tyrants die off……I’m thinking that is a bridge too far for SCOTUS
Trump Prosecutor, Jack Smith, Alleged Role In Extortion Scheme While at the ICJ
Larry Johnson sonar21.com 12 December 2023.
FTA:
“My old friend and business partner, John Moynihan, filed a whistleblower complaint with the Department of Justice Inspector General’s Office on November 28 alleging that Jack Smith, the Special Prosecutor pursuing Donald Trump, was engaged in an extortion scheme while he was working at the International Court of Justice.
“It is no coincidence that Jack Smith, in the wake of that complaint, made an impromptu move on Monday (December 11) asking the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether Donald Trump had immunity to the charges filed by Smith. Moynihan’s complaint was filed on November 28, 2023 and Smith, 13 days later decides to bypass the Appeals Courts. Smells like politics.”
URL link to article
https://sonar21.com/trump-prosecutor-jack-smith-alleged-role-in-extortion-scheme/
Ah, Mary McCord. I see male features in this picture of this so called Mary person.
Maybe I have just learned to suspect such deceit because our current crop of COUP occupants in control of this nation always seek first to deceive us and then they pounce like a Cougar in the night.
who is jack smith
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/12/breaking-trump-prosecutor-jack-smith-alleged-role-extortion/
This makes sense now in view of the whistleblower complaint with the Department of Justice Inspector General’s Office alleging that Jack Smith was engaged in an extortion scheme while he was working at the International Court of Justice.
That complaint was made on November 28. 13 days prior to Smiths request.
https://www.deepcapture.com/2023/12/extortionist-jack-smith-is-being-extorted-to-pursue-trump/
Mary McCord. To quote Austin Powers, “That’s not a woman. It’s a man, baby!” If it really is a woman someone beat her with an ugly stick!
It seems like Jack Smith may have a corruption and money laundering problem himself. Look for the DOJ to be trying to cover his butt over the next week.
Unlucky HorseFace McCord!
If the bitem gang is asking the SCOTUS for a ruling it can only mean they already have the outcome fixed.