[Transcript] – Today we were invited to witness something of profound importance.
A promise made … an oath taken.
For those who care about the truth, an oath is no small thing.
An oath is a solemn appeal to God… asking him to bear witness to a promise.
But more revealing by far is how a person making a promise or taking an oath actually behaves… what they do.
A person might promise in a court of law to tell the truth … on a battlefield to be steadfast to comrades until death.
But the proof of the pudding lies in how the taker of the oath lives their life.
It would have been easy to be distracted today by pageantry and pomp… all the music and marching… that’s the name of the game on a day like today… razzle dazzle ‘em.
But the heart of the matter of the coronation of King Charles III… like the grain of sand at the heart of a pearl, was a promise.
The King’s promise to us … the people.
Charles promised and swore to govern the people of this United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland according to our laws and customs.
The laws and customs in question are not the endless pages of legislation drafted and enacted by here today and gone tomorrow politicians in parliament… but ‘The Law’.
The law that is old beyond the reach of memory, which is to say the immutable law of the land, which is the common law that by centuries, if not by millennia, predates any legislation drafted and enacted by any parliament in Westminster.
The law of this land of ours is that we are free people.
We don’t stand in line to receive our freedom bit by bit like breadcrumbs dropped from on high.
On the contrary we are born free, and woe should betide any that seeks to compromise that freedom.
The intention of the common law is that we govern ourselves with minimal interference from the state knowing as we do right from wrong.
In an ideal world we tell the state what to do, enabling them as so many administrators.
We appoint as our most esteemed servants those we trust to preserve our freedom.
Implicit in our employment of them as servants is the understanding that if they fail … we reserve the right to be done with them and find others better suited.
If you doubt me, see, for example, the Declaration of Abroath, of 1320, that most defiant assertion of freedom … the spirit of which went around the world and back again.
Here in Britain, we are invited to trust that we live in what is called a constitutional monarchy.
In our constitutional monarchy the monarch is our most senior public servant.
Each of us is a sovereign individual. Our monarch is also sovereign, the first sovereign among equals. And he is our servant.
In 1688, on the accession of King William of Orange, the parliament of the day had the treasonous temerity to claim that it, the parliament, was sovereign.
Ever since then, some parliamentarians have repeated the lie.
That parliament is sovereign.
In fact, our constitution makes plain only the people are sovereign.
The constitution, and the natural law that long predates the constitution puts sovereignty utterly beyond the reach of parliament … for all time. Parliament can no more attain sovereignty than touch the face of God.
Before and after 1688, and then the Bill of Rights of 1689, one parliament after another sought to claim sovereignty over the people. All have lied by so doing.
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again … without fear of contradiction and because it must be repeated until enough people realise the significance … it is only and always the people that are sovereign.
Today we watched and listened as King Charles III promised to govern according to the law, which is to say our ancient common law.
He thereby promised to defend our sovereignty as individuals and the sovereignty of this Britain.
Implicit in his promise before God is that he understands and believes that Britain is sovereign and that he, as monarch, will keep it so.
Untroubled by the interference of outsiders great and small.
Not to put too fine a point on it, by outsiders great and small I mean the usual suspects … the WEF, the UN, the WHO and the rest of the international acronym gangs.
Those are unelected, unaccountable bodies, all seeking a hand in ruling over this country and all countries.
Under the terms of an amended pandemic preparedness treaty, the WHO would award itself jaw-dropping powers.
It proposes to empower itself to declare pandemics or states of climate emergency – and then to lock us down and impose whatever other restrictions on our freedom that they see fit.
This is what I mean about profound importance.
By his coronation oath King Charles swore to maintain the integrity of Britain and to protect that integrity against any external entity. He promised that we would remain free.
So far so sovereign … but all of this begs a question:
Are we a sovereign people or not?
Are we still an independent entity with meaningful borders and supported by the commitment of our government to maintain the independence and sovereignty that our monarch swore to defend this afternoon?
I ask this question because, considering what has been going on in recent years, a person would be forgiven for doubting that nation states, in the West at least, are still a thing.
Today of all days … coronation day … it seems appropriate to think about all this.
If we are free people, of the sort King Charles just swore to defend, according to our law, if there are any nation states in the West, why did we so recently listen to that Charles, then Prince of Wales and heir to the throne, talk about how we should build back better?
In the same days and weeks that the Prince of Wales talked about the need to build back better.
So did one western leader after another.
If this is a world of independent sovereign states … how on earth did it come to pass that they all, apparently, had the same thought, called for the same things, at exactly the same time, as though they were in lockstep and reading from the same script?
And if there was a script for the leaders of the West … who wrote it?
Build back better … a narrow window of opportunity … the great reset … how come so many leaders of allegedly sovereign nations spoke the same words at the same time?
King Charles, when he was Prince of Wales, stood shoulder to shoulder with those calling for the Great Reset … Build Back Better. He has undoubtedly been an outspoken globalist committed to the notion of centralised control and decision making.
Today he swore an oath to govern according to the law of this land of Britain, this sovereign nation of Britain.
Promises matter.
As I have already said, what matters most is not what a person says. What matters more is what a person does.
Net Zero… Digital ID… CBDCs… social credit scores… surveillance societies… 15-minute cities… the policies pursued by all those unelected, unaccountable bodies… all of those are erosions of our freedom.
It turns out building back better isn’t better at all – not for the likes of you and me.
I have no time at all for republicanism, by the way.
Elected heads of state … which almost inevitably means ex-politicians. That way lies President Blair … President Johnson … President Starmer.
The fundamental problem … and threat … of politicians as heads of state is that they are creatures of the politics from which they spring … like gargoyles on the walls of a cathedral.
In an imperfect world populated by imperfect people, I would make the Hobson’s Choice of a constitutional monarchy every time.
The point of a monarchy … of hereditary peers as well … is that they are … theoretically at least … invested in the long term. Governments come and go … with their egos, petty point scoring and manifestos … focused always on political expediency … the hope of winning the next election.
But for good or ill the upper house and the monarch are supposed to consider the impact fifty years from now, a hundred years from now.
Theoretically they see to the planting of the trees that will provide the necessary shade for our great grandchildren.
Any government will, given the freedom to do so, draft legislation that will enable it to do whatever it wants. Any government will put itself in a position from which it cannot be challenged or removed.
There’s another question worth considering: should a government have the power to do what it wants … or not?
If you think not … then it’s worth looking again at what was attempted by that parliament of 1688 … when the most ambitious clique in the land seized the opportunity to put itself above the monarch … and therefore above all of us.
Long ago, long before Magna Carta or any other written document, our ancestors understood that individual freedoms were paramount.
The constitution that evolved here in Britain, making us a nation of sovereign individuals, reflected that ancient wisdom.Governments can seek to paper over it all they want … to tell us this or that part of the constitution has been superseded by an Act of Parliament. They can even pretend the constitution is not there. They can distract us with marching bands, bunting and flags.
But the fact remains … and today of all days it is worth remembering … if not shouting from the rooftops … we are free people. That much is inalienable and undeniable. If a coronation like today’s is to mean anything at all, then it reaffirms that freedom … and promises it will last forever.
So I ask again: are we a constitutional monarchy – in a way that means anything – or are we not?
Are we a democracy – and having the vote every few years is not democracy in any meaningful sense – or are we not?
People will tell you we don’t have a constitution here in Britain. In the US, people hold up their constitution like Captain America’s shield. In the end, you might even say no constitution is required. In the end, it’s about right and wrong. Truth and lies. And we all know the difference.
But our constitution does exist and it carefully puts ultimate power beyond the reach of government or any other usurper. Our constitution enshrines ultimate power where it belongs … with the people.
To anyone who says our constitution was superseded by the act of any government, I ask:
Do you accept a government can gather unto itself the power to do whatever it likes?
If the answer is yes, then I say that you accept despotism and tyranny.
Here’s the thing: I want someone somewhere to respect us enough to tell us the truth about Britain today. Then we’ll know where we stand.
Do the powers that be truly regard us as free people, living in a sovereign nation, or do they not?
Today of all days, it’s not too much ask.
LOL … Tucker – The only way to know is not watch what they say ..watch what they do.. watch how they live . that’s the only accurate measure of what people is … be like your dog . ”
Tucker Carlson – Oxford AL 5/4/23 Key note Address for the Rainbow Omega Foundation
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/05/laura-davidson/reality-consciousness-and-the-case-for-free-will/
Laura Davidson’s essay on consciousness and free will is sublime.
I ask, do the King and Queen cast a ballot in the Parliamentary elections?
I don’t know, but that seems to be the question of equality, or the superiority of the law.
The royal family does not vote.
The balcony photos speaks of the missing prodigal son. We will never know how Father-King/Son-Prince relationship involves showing up but not in this historical event family photos. Sad for both.
Harry ain’t his kid!
Which of the gossip tabloids have you absorbed? How much harm have they done, do you know? Propagating something that harm other people you have no absolute proof of makes you just as guilty.
Yeah – the family resemblance is overwhelming.
https://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/489856/prince-harry-takes-after-charles-spencer/
He can look like Diana’s uncle, but that doesn’t make him King Charles son. Looks just like her bodyguard.
“Can look like”? Able to choose … “can look like”?
Some telephone chain from the dark you have going there. You’ve really taken to new heights unconfirmed rumors as statements of facts. James and Diana didn’t even meet until 1986, two years after Harry was born. Now it’s an affair too with her bodyguard? Slander.
Slanderous news – go to the source and check it out. Without wood, a fire goes out. You wouldn’t want to be the person evil people lie on the witness stand about you or having to co-operate with them.
Lies are blatantly told and propagated permeating through all institutions; propaganda not limited to communist regimes; targeting innocents and people without stature; tearing down people with some position and power trying to right wrongs. Targeting children instead of educating them as they should be while under assaults with lies, grooming, banning for not complying.
Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.
Ephesians 5:11
May you have a blessed day. Peace out.
The balcony photo only shows “working royals” and their children. Andrew was banished from being a working royal by his mother after he humiliated the Crown with his boorish and inexcusable behavior. Harry CHOSE not to be a working royal. Also, after the way Harry and his shrew wife have sold out every member of the royal family in their quest to get rich, how could anyone in the family ever trust either of them again? If Harry had been welcomed to participate in all of the festivities of the coronation, side by side with the rest of his family, how long before he would take several million $$$ to “tell all” to Oprah or write another book or star in another Netflix series?
Harry has nobody to blame for the giant chasm in his family but himself – at the behest of his wife.
May I add, you might notice Princess Anne isn’t up there either, since I believe she retired as a working royal.
Princess Anne has not retired, She had engagements in the days leading up to the coronation. She was standing behind Kate on the balcony next to her husband.
Thank you
The Prodigal Son. Has nothing to do with working royals. Whatever the son has done, no matter if contexts and deeds done does not make one’s father or son relationship by birth any less than that – father, son. In this world, this is how this is commonly defined where there are lines drawn between kin and the denizens of the larger world, when there are relationships outside of kin which are based on ‘love your neighbor as thyself’ .. ‘love that lays down one’s life for another’ a brother’ .. anyone. The coronation’s mass for the first time emphasizing mass service and promises to subjects ring hollow; when love and service to one’s own family was in fact made most distinctly fundamentally missing.
Blame Harry. Blame Megyn. Blame Charles – whoever one chooses. This is not blaming nor any personal judgment on any of the characters, Charles included.
It is one out of millions of perspective of which has nothing to do with like or dislike or personal judgment of the individuals concerned; that it is sad the whole coronation monarchy thing was played out to be a whole lot what is isn’t. Trust your King has your best interests at heart nation. That’s the gist.
To hell with all what the pundits, tabloids, bystanders and strangers alike making varied judgments; particularly tabloids and publications and talk show hosts outdoing each other; for nothing more sensationalism and the wages of sin. Even those who know the royals in person or experiences; of more shame to those who never even have met any of them.
Mighty powerful words describing an incredible journey through hard won battles.. our journey from serf to free citizens… and now all hangs by a threadbare strand…
“a person would be forgiven for doubting that nation states, in the West at least, are still a thing.”
“And if there was a script for the leaders of the West … who wrote it?”
“I want someone somewhere to respect us enough to tell us the truth about Britain today.”
The truth about Britain? Easy. It’s the truth about all Western nations: their self-pronounced elites have all been infected with “transnational progressivism.” This is different from the old “liberal internationalism.” Internationalism implies relations BETWEEN nations, whereas with transnational progressivism sovereign nations cease to exist, the world having “transcended” notions of nationhood.
This affliction has been around for quite a while. Bill Clinton was a walking carrier, a Typhoid Mary of transnational progressivism. Of course, as with every other latest and greatest pipe dream by which the elite plot to make the world a better place (meaning their lives improve and we deplorables can go eat bugs) no one wants to actually TELL you their intentions for fear we might object to their newly thought up paradigm for our servitude.
Anyway, a few little articles to guide you in your first steps down this rabbit hole.
https://claremontreviewofbooks.com/beyond-the-nation-state/
https://claremontreviewofbooks.com/one-nation/
https://claremontreviewofbooks.com/nationalism-through-a-glass-darkly/
Don’t forget George HW Bush and his New World Order.
The Declaration of Arbroath —
Neil Oliver is a man after my own heart.
He understands, as did his Scottish ancestors long, long ago, that freedom is bestowed by God, and as long as man is connected to his Creator, that freedom can never be crushed permanently.
Thus the WEF effort towards brain chips and brainwashing – for that disconnection of the sons of Adam and daughters of Eve from God himself is necessary for the Enemy to achieve his goals.
BTW, the German family pretending to the throne of Scotland are usurpers, imho. Bring back the Stuarts, or even better, the most ancient line of all, if it can be found. Chuck is a piker corrupted to the core by his association with Savile and others. God raises up kings and casts them down. Let’s see what He does with Chuck.
For it is not for glory, nor riches, nor honor that we are fighting, but for freedom – for that that which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/FeaturesBritain/Medieval_TextArbroath01.htm
I applaud what Neil said, but in my 1/4 Scottish ears it rings hollow until Scotland is free from Britain.
I also want and pray for Georgia to be free from the tyranny of Mordor-on-the-Potomac a retain the sovereignty it lost (as all of the other States) in 1865.
USA is not a free country, and hasn’t been since 1865. Our “freedom” is an illusion that, until the last 20 years, was allowable for us to think. Now the gargoyles infesting Mordor-on-the-Potomac and our State capitol are openly promoting our destruction.
Charles is a global warming climate change deceiver. The oaf took an oath.
Worthless spectacle of rattling jewlery.
😳👀
Oaf took an oath Best line of the day
A simple answer for Neil’s video: Charles supports GMO and the dietary vision of the WEF for the population. Yet, when he travels, he travels with organic food, grown on his own organic farm. That should explain his philosophy.
Oath’s with people like (king) Charles are window dressing for the plebes to feel as though our “betters” have our best interest in mind. The truth is much darker and nasty and doesn’t include you or me.
Keep in mind that Randy Andy (Prince Andrew) and his love of Epstein Island and by extension repugnant deviant pedo activities that the “King” his brother…I’d bet was aware of and condoned it, if not participated. He just loves the WEF and their sexual deviants Schwab & Harrari.
It was rumored that Price Phillip, their dad, had such proclivities and even said when he dies would like to come back as a virus to thin the herd, you know, us useless eaters.
The point, the oath means nothing to a narcissist with zero character, honor and a real love of God and our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
I could care less about the King, God save the people.
The “House of Windsor” is the “House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha”. German. The name was changed to Windsor in 1917.
This guy Charles like all the rest of the turds don’t give a crap what we the people think, they want us eating bugs.
Brother Neil hit the bullseye with this perspective!
This ought to be spread far and wide.
GOD’s Natural Law supersedes all.
God loved his creation so much He allowed it to be free to reject Him. Incomprehensible Love!
Will someone please makes sure King Charles gets and sees this? ASAP!
Listen to The Quash podcast by Legalman. He has thoroughly analyzed the writings of Lysander Spooner. Spooner’s essay, Natural Law, goes deeply into this question. Read spooner’s other works, Trial by Jury, No Treason for example and you can only conclude that we in the west live in countries governed by criminals who have lied, cheated, and stolen their ways into power. The notion that we live as free people in our respective countries, whether the USA, UK, or Canada is an absolute joke. The criminal governments have illegally taken our rights and freedoms at every opportunity. The question is who do they work for? Cui bono? The global banks and the families that founded them.
They work for Satan.
One thing I became preoccupied with, since the time I had toddlers, was leather kid’s shoes made in a free country, preferably the U.S. Anyone who has to obtain decent kids’ shoes knows they do not exist for any of us “ordinary taxpayers.”
So I looked at the shoes on William and Kate’s younger two, and wondered, “Do they have to settle for shoes made by political prisoner slave labor?” Probably not. They have leather shoes, made by the Royal Cobbler, paid for by the British people whose kids are shod with plastic shoes made by political prisoner slave labor.
Talking about kids’ shoes is banal, I know, but it pretty much sums up what I think of the current situation with a constitutional monarchy. It’s far too expensive, in its current state, for the people who are entrusting their freedom to it.
Good Analogy! Al Bundy would be proud.
“An oath is a solemn appeal to God… asking him to bear witness to a promise.”
Yes it is. And every cop, federal agent, soldier, sailor, airman, Marine, court appointed official, and politician that swore an oath to protect and defend the Constitution against foreign and domestic enemies is an oath breaker. A traitor.
When you see American troops or law enforcement with the stars and stripes on their shoulders, those are enemy troops. Those are the same troops that blew up the derailed hazmat cars in Palestine, Ohio. Those are the same enemy troops that blew up 18,000 cows in Texas. Those are the same enemy troops that just dumped four feet of snow on Upper Michigan in May. Hybrid warfare.
This is what happens when you don’t do your DUTY as defined in the Declaration of Independence.
It is not too late for the Unorganized Militia to save the Constitution, but it won’t happen until you stop censoring free speech for our enemies…
How about when you’re a local elected official, and your oath only involves the state and federal constitutions and “demeaning” yourself faithfully in office—and you are asked by the members of the bar (judges and ex-officials who practice law) to follow a state law which violates your state’s constitution? In fact, you get NO SUPPORT from any corner (say a few of your own voters/supporters)—what then?
BTW, I’ll bet that if this is a situation in my state (pretty deep red), it’s happening everywhere.
While in office I became very deeply convinced that the entire public needed to be trained on the meaning of an oath.
So you are asking conservatives to spend another thirty years sitting at the back of the bus, with you having the power to moderate our speech.
Fuq that. I’m Deplorable, remember? I’m hijacking the bus…
Have you considered that I might have speaking autobiographically?
Do you think an elected official should risk going to jail to prove the point, that the state legislature is violating the state constitution in EVERY possible way with the “laws” they’re passing?? Which the governor happily signs? This is in a RED STATE!
The county prosecutors are “in” on this racket with the county’s judges, BTW.
“we pledge our Lives, our Fortunes, and our Sacred Honor”
What about the power of one family BEFORE they became a constitutional monarchy? This stuff is ridiculous.
The only people who benifit from this day as a profound importance to them are the WEF/One World Order people who their king has already sold out his “Loyal Subjects” to.
He already has.
I trusted his mother more – she refused to give up the throne until she was dead. If she thought he’d do a good job, she would have given it to him sooner. By holding out, she limited the damage he could do – notice the fat hands, his days are numbered with not a big number.
Elizabeth the Nice didn’t lift a bejeweled finger to protest her subjects’ being forced into national house arrest during the Great Scamdemic — on the contrary, she supported it fully and even publicly exhorted her subjects to get the Death Jab.
Good rant by Mr Oliver, but he still missed it. Today ‘we’ face marxist ideologues, people who want power to tear apart our country so it can be a marxist hellhole. The Kenyan is well on his way.
Pomp and circumstance. Western Civilizational dominance is over. “God” is fashioning it into something else.
I must take exception to the statement made that the British Constitutions is anything close to that of the United States. The US Constitution and supporting documents differentiates us from any other form of government on the planet.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
The rights to govern us is G-I-V-E-N to the government by the people and not “bestowed” upon the people by the government!
With Respect, Richard, our Constitution’s wording was adapted from the Magna Carta and Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of Englad, as well as history and natural Rights from G_D. The Founding Fathers were well educated on History, and knew what they were writing, so the similarity with the British Constitution is allowable.
Does Great Britain even have a constitution – perhaps not.
I observed, with amusment, the future king’s leaking pen incident. Royalty schmoyalty.
I set my alarm and watched most of it; it was pageantry at its finest!!!
What a beautiful ceremony and the British people were so happy
observing and celebrating their glorious traditions.
The communist/Marxist group was busy trying to wreak havoc
on the occasion and for the most part were turned back.
i think a country’s traditions should be honored, not torn apart
by no nothing zealots.
You realize that King Charles is sitting at the top of the comunist WEF leadership? LOL
he is not at the top
he may be a useful idiot to them
but then so are many in this country LOL
I love the pageantry
I love different cultures
I do not love it when other cultures are bashed
for no reason other than they are not us
Great Britain took over many countries to build their empire
and it was wrong
people from Europe left to form the US
which was great for building our country
however, now the US goes all over the world
starting wars which is also wrong
One thing one must learn is that history with
all its unpleasantness (to put it lightly) is what
formed each of our countries. And, we all have
evolved. BTW, Great Britain ended slavery
well before the US did.
And, Prince Charles has very little power in
the government of the UK.
“Do the powers that be truly regard us as free people, living in a sovereign nation, or do they not?”
Imagine someone asking that question of the Political class.
Because up to now the people haven’t done their DUTY by picking up torches and pitchforks and taking out the trash like Thomas Jefferson intended…
Yes, but it has to be smart…..and the enemy is everywhere….possibly the person who you consider your best friend, relative or pastor, even.
That’s the problem….you can’t trust even the trustworthy……
Let’s be specific for those who don’t know this, the odds of being betrayed by the pastor are very high due to the DHS and their Clergy Response Team of 20,000 pastors and church leaders meant to keep their congregations calm in the event of martial law roundups.
Most of the other infiltrators we might encounter would be handled by your local police department working in league with DHS Fusion and the FBI. They recruit the local mentally ill, freemasons, street people, to stalk targeted people.
But none of that fed stalking behavior can stop what is coming once We The People rise as one. And that is coming…
“And that is coming…”
Agreed!
I may be incorrect, but his voice seems to have a more resolute tone in this video, more determined to present the Truth, as if he is being “encouraged” to not be as adamant in how he details current events.
So he would rather have a chief executive who is chosen by his ancestry rather than by the people who can actually vet the guy. Got it.
“England since the conquest hath known some few good monarchs, but groaned beneath a much larger number of bad ones: yet no man in his senses can say that their claim under William the Conqueror is a very honourable one. A French bastard landing with an armed Banditti and establishing himself king of England against the consent of the natives, is in plain terms a very paltry rascally original. It certainly hath no divinity in it. However it is needless to spend much time in exposing the folly of hereditary right; if there are any so weak as to believe it, let them promiscuously worship the Ass and the Lion, and welcome. I shall neither copy their humility, nor disturb their devotion. … Men who look upon themselves born to reign, and others to obey, soon grow insolent; selected from the rest of mankind their minds are early poisoned by importance; and the world they act in differs so materially from the world at large, that they have but little opportunity of knowing its true interests, and when they succeed to the government are frequently the most ignorant and unfit of any throughout the dominions. …Of more worth is one honest man to society, and in the sight of God, than all the crowned ruffians that ever lived.”–Thomas Paine
A Kingly Proposal: Letter from Julian Assange to King Charles III (declassifieduk.org)
Crowns and Hazards: with Mark’s guests Dickie Arbiter, Martin Bell, Peter Hitchens, Kate Hoey, Robert Lacey, L Ian MacDonald, Alexandra Marshall, Maggie Mutesi, Laura Perrins, Helen Rappaport, David Starkey and Hugo Vickers :: SteynOnline
The WEF King ascends to the British throne (dossier.today)—Jordan Schachtel: “With the death of Queen Elizabeth II, humanity, and in particular, western civilization, has lost an absolute giant. She was a remarkable person from a remarkable era. She will be missed. Her successor, on the other hand, can best be understood as the WEF (World Economic Forum) king. King Charles is truly a king for our times, in the worst possible way imaginable. He is a perfect representation of the western ruling class and its pernicious agenda. Charles, to put it bluntly, is an anti-human reprobate, who has lived a life of disgrace, hypocrisy, and corruption. But his lifestyle is the least of the issues at hand. Charles is a king who has embraced and promoted the most destructive causes of our times. Most notably, Charles is both a climate catastrophist and an advocate for the depopulation agenda.” …….
URGENT CORONATION PROPHETIC WARNING – with Emma Stark and Ruth Weller | Decree The Week! – YouTube
A Corrupt State Church
A Corrupt King
A Corrupt Government
All seeking a Kingdom of Darkness and a Tidal Wave of Deception.
NOT ON OUR WATCH!
1.) We welcome a Tidal Wave of the Spirit of Truth.
2.) We Bless the Remnant to arise.
3.) We welcome the Kingdom of God to be built by the Ecclesia.
John 16:12-15
12-15 “I still have many things to tell you, but you can’t handle them now. But when the Friend comes, the Spirit of the Truth, he will take you by the hand and guide you into all the truth there is. He won’t draw attention to himself, but will make sense out of what is about to happen and, indeed, out of all that I have done and said. He will honor me; he will take from me and deliver it to you. Everything the Father has is also mine. That is why I’ve said, ‘He takes from me and delivers to you.’
Yes and Amen, Lord Jesus!
Rest in the Vine: Local Man in Hurry to be Crowned King of England and Start Great Reset
has Mum Vaxxed to Death: Film at 11
Emma Stark is a false prophet and wolf in sheep’s clothing
A few years ago I would have vehemently defended a Constitutional Republic against a Constitutional Monarchy but with what I know now and how Mr. Oliver explains it, both are trying for the same end. And both fail at various rates and in various ways. I’m not saying I would now choose the monarchy, I’m saying my arrogance about my opinion has been decimated into dust.
Power corrupts, whether elected or inherited.
I understand what you are saying, but I still think that a constitutional republic is better than a constitutional monarchy.
In a republic, the citizens have a still have a voice in their government even if it has been corrupted.
In a monarchy, the citizens are technically subjects of a crown that they have no control over and no ability to remove. The monarchy is chosen based on heredity alone.
I also hate how monarchs claim that they rule via divine right, which is the idea that royal families occupy their positions of power because God chose and ordained them to be royal leaders.
This the reason why the sitting British monarch has a figurehead leadership position within the Church of England and why Church of England officials are involved in royal coronations.
This is one reason why I would never affiliate with the Church of England as I oppose this.
I don’t believe that God ordained any of the currently reigning royal families in the world and I don’t include any monarch within my personal religious beliefs whatsoever.
I understand that God ordained King David as the leader of Israel in the Bible, but that was done in order to establish the royal lineage of Jesus as the messiah and is irrelevant to any currently reigning royal family.
I never got over the tampon comment Charles wrote to Camilla whilst he was married to Diana.
Ever since he is a joke.
that he made in a private conversation
which was hacked and released
It was indeed tacky; I was taken back also.
However, to say he is a joke because of it is a little lazy.
We Americans fought a revolution to free ourselves from the lunacy of rule by birthright. Half of my own family tree finds my grandfather, after whom I am named, having spent 2 years in a British POW camp during Ireland’s War of Independence just over 100 years ago so that his sons, and by extension ME, could live as free men in a Republic, unshackled from the despots of a foreign throne.
It is inconceivable & shameful that any American was interested in and enjoyed this farce. Further, the Irish diaspora, of which I am part, is found in massive numbers in every nook & crany of this earth – all due to the tyrany of the throne of the British. How can ANY not be revolted?
Diana trusted this same man to be faithful to his wedding vows.
Didn’t work out well for her.
The “forth branch” controls the constitutional three. The forth branch is controlled by the WEF and the BIS. The WEF and the BIS are controlled by the royal families of Europe, thru “the square mile”. The USA has never been truly independent from CONTROL.
I’ll add “In my opinion” tho I have read and researched much in my many years.
Side note :- (most) every road entering The City (of London) aka “the square mile” is guarded by dragons
As was Neil Oliver, I too was struck by the solemnity of the oaths King Charles swore, that he was swearing to God his fealty to the people. He will continue down the globalist path at his eternal peril.
Charles promised to be faithful to Diana when he married her but knew he had been having a long affair with Camilla, who was married, and that he intended to continue that affair. He knowingly lied before God and should not be king because the king is the Defender of the Faith in England.
Charles took an oath on a previous occasion during a widely publicized ceremony. It is well documented that he failed to keep that oath. Now we are expected to believe that this weekend’s oath is something special.
I abhor the concept of royalty. Monarchies remove the ability of the people to have a say over their own government. This is still true even with limited monarchs like the British monarch.
The British monarchy still has tremendous power through their bully pulpit and by using their vast wealth to donate to causes that they believe in.
Queen Elizabeth may have been politically neutral in her public life, but she may also very well have been politically involved behind the scenes.
King Charles doesn’t even have the sense to be politically neutral in public, which is actually a good thing as it lets the public know where he stands on the issues instead of being a public mystery like his mother was.
The best form of government is a constitutional republic as it gives the people a voice, but tempers the problem of mob rule found in direct democracies.